BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent episodic headache that affects approximately 14%-15% of the global population. Since valsartan is an antihypertensive drug, it is hypothesized that taking valsartan can prevent migraine attacks in patients with the condition. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of propranolol versus valsartan in preventing migraine attacks.
METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 56 patients with migraine from a neurology clinic. Patients were divided into two equal groups of 28 individuals, after providing informed consent. The patients then received either propranolol or valsartan treatment. The intensity and frequency of migraines were compared before and after treatment in both study groups.
RESULTS: The patients\' mean age was 32.78 years old (±6.9 SD), and 64% of the patients were female. After a 1-month treatment period, the results showed that valsartan patients experienced significantly fewer severe migraine attacks compared to propranolol patients.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the present study, valsartan may be at least as effective as propranolol and perhaps more effective on some measures.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician\'s practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. β blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i\'s as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) has unique pathogenic and clinical features with worse prognosis than other causes of heart failure (HF), despite the fact that patients with CCC are often younger and have fewer comorbidities. Patients with CCC were not adequately represented in any of the landmark HF studies that support current treatment guidelines. PARACHUTE-HF (Prevention And Reduction of Adverse outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation) is an active-controlled, randomized, phase IV trial designed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily vs enalapril 10 mg twice daily added to standard of care treatment for HF. The study aims to enroll approximately 900 patients with CCC and reduced ejection fraction at around 100 sites in Latin America. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of time from randomization to cardiovascular death, first HF hospitalization, or relative change from baseline to week 12 in NT-proBNP levels. PARACHUTE-HF will provide new data on the treatment of this high-risk population. (Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC [PARACHUTE-HF]; NCT04023227).

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Transactivation of insulin-growth-factor-receptor (IGF-1R) by angiotensin-II-type-1-receptor (AT-1R) was only demonstrated in vascular-smooth-muscle cells and has never been tested in breast-cancer (BC). This investigation addressed the impact of chronic AT-1R blockade by valsartan (Val) on possible concurrent AT-1R/IGF-1R signaling inhibition, regressing BC-tumor-microenvironment (TME) cellular components activation, and hindering BC development.
METHODS: The effect of different Val doses (10, 20, 40 & 80 mg/kg/day for 490 days) was tested on dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced progesterone-promoted-BC in rats. The influence on intratumoral/circulating angiotensin-II (ANG-II) levels and AT-1R/Mas-R immunofluorescent-expression were assessed. The potential AT-1R/IGF-1R crosstalk within TME-BC-stem-cells (BCSCs) and cancer-associated-fibroblasts (CAFs) was evaluated by fluorescently marking these cells and locating the immunofluorescently-stained AT-1R/IGF-1R in them using confocal-laser-microscopy and further quantified by flow cytometry. In addition, the molecular alterations following blocking AT-1R were inspected including determining Src; crucial for IGF-1R transactivation by AT-1R, Notch-1; IGF-IR transcriptional-regulator, and PI3K/Akt &IL-6/STAT expression. Further, the suppression of CSCs\' capabilities to maintain pluripotency, stemness features, epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EMT), and angiogenesis was evaluated by assessing NANOG gene, aldehyde-dehydrogenase (ALDH), N-cadherin and vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF), respectively. Furthermore, the proliferative marker; Ki-67, was detected by immunostaining, and tumors were histologically graded using Elston-Ellis-modified-Scarff-Bloom-Richardson method.
RESULTS: Prophylactic Val significantly reduced tumor size, prolonged latency, reduced tumor histopathologic grade, decreased circulating/intratumoral-ANG-II levels, increased Mas-R, and decreased AT1R expression. AT-1R/IGF-1R were co-expressed with a high correlation coefficient on CAFs/BCSCs. Moreover, Val significantly attenuated IGF-1R transactivation and transcriptional regulation via Src and Notch-1 genes\' downregulation and reduced Src/IGF-IR-associated PI3K/Akt and IL-6/STAT3 signaling. Further, Val significantly decreased intratumoral NANOG, ALDH, N-cadherin, VEGF, and Ki-67 levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic Val administration carries a potential for repurposing as adjuvant or conjunct therapy for patients at high risk for BC.

For the approval of a drug, the stability data must be submitted to regulatory authorities. Such analyses are often time-consuming and cost-intensive. Forced degradation studies are mainly carried out under harsh conditions in the dissolved state, often leading to extraneous degradation profiles for a solid drug. Oxidative mechanochemical degradation offers the possibility of generating realistic degradation profiles. In this study, a sustainable mechanochemical procedure is presented for the degradation of five active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from the sartan family: losartan potassium, irbesartan, valsartan, olmesartan medoxomil, and telmisartan. High-resolution mass spectrometry enabled the detection of impurities already present in untreated APIs and allowed the elucidation of degradation products. Significant degradation profiles could already be obtained after 15-60 min of ball milling time. Many of the identified degradation products are described in the literature and pharmacopoeias, emphasizing the significance of our results and the applicability of this approach to predict degradation profiles for drugs in the solid state.

Since 2014, sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto®) is widely prescribed for heart failure. Despite neprilysin inhibition\'s benefits in heart failure, concerns about potential amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation and Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) risk have persisted. This narrative review, a decade post-approval, evaluates the risk of amyloid pathology and neurocognitive disorders in long-term sacubitril/valsartan use. Clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacovigilance data do not indicate an increased risk of cognitive decline. In patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan blood-based amyloid biomarkers show perturbations, while neuroimaging biomarkers reveal no significant increase in amyloid load. Despite a theoretical risk of amyloid accumulation and AD under treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, current clinical data appears reassuring, and there is no signal indicating an increased risk of cognitive decline, but a perturbation of amyloid blood-based biomarkers, which implies great caution when interpreting biomarkers in this context.

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are effective against heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but hypotension is a significant complication. Predictors of ARNI-associated hypotension remain unclear. This study aimed to determine predictors of hypotension after administering an ARNI to patients with HF accompanied by ARNI.This retrospective multicenter observational study analyzed data from 138 consecutive patients with HF treated with an ARNI between August 2020 and July 2021. Hypotension attributed to an ARNI after treatment was defined as (A) systolic blood pressure (SBP) below the 1st quartile ≤ 25 mmHg, and as (B) absolute SBP ≤ 103 mmHg. SBP was measured at baseline, after ARNI treatment, at first follow-up as outpatients and on day 7 for inpatients. Presence of atrial fibrillation, and greater BUN/Cr ratio, and SBP at baseline were significant independent predictors for hypotension after ARNI administration on multivariate analyses. Among 43 patients with AF, fine f-waves on electrocardiograms were significantly more prevalent in the hypotensive group.A robust reduction in blood pressure after ARNI administration is associated with AF and elevated BUN/Cr. This highlights the need for caution when administering ARNI to patients with HF.

The current study aimed to investigate the anti-atrial fibrillatory (AF) effects of a combination of valsartan and a calcium channel blocker (cilnidipine or amlodipine) in Dahl salt-sensitive (Dahl S) rats. Seven-week-old male Dahl S rats were fed an 8% salt diet. Six weeks later, valsartan (60 mg/kg, Val group), cilnidipine + valsartan (10 + 60 mg/kg, CV group), amlodipine + valsartan (3 + 60 mg/kg, AV group), or vehicle was orally administered daily for 5 weeks. Echocardiography and atrial electrophysiological evaluations were performed on the last day of treatment. Blood pressure in each drug treatment group was lower than in the Vehicle group. The duration of AF induced by atrial burst stimulation was shorter in the Val group (3.2 ± 1.6 s) than in the Vehicle group (11.2 ± 6.0 s), which was further shortened in the CV and AV groups (1.1 ± 0.3 and 1.3 ± 0.3 s, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular fractional shortening were greater in the CV and AV groups than those in the Vehicle group. Urinary albumin excretion in the CV group was the lowest among the drug-treated groups. The results collectively suggest that the combination of a calcium channel blocker with valsartan could be useful in terms of its anti-AF action as well as for improving cardiac and renal functions.

Over the last decade, randomized clinical trials of several pharmacologic agents have demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and other important secondary outcomes. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibitors and Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors have now become pillars in the treatment of heart failure. Ivabradine is a negative chronotropic agent used as an adjunctive therapy in patients with heart failure. Two new hypertension therapies, zilebresiran and aprocitentan, are currently in investigational stages. Finally, mavacamten has emerged as a pharmacologic treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Practitioners must be familiar with the indications and side effects of newer therapies as they are now frequently prescribed.