This study aimed to evaluate the association between sacubitril/valsartan and dementia-related adverse events (AEs) in geographical subpopulations using subgroup disproportionality analysis. Cases from the FDA adverse event reporting system involving patients aged 60 or older with sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were analyzed. The adjusted reporting odds ratios (RORs) for dementia-related AEs were calculated for each continent. A total of 61,518 AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan or ARBs were identified. Among these, 1441 were dementia-related AEs. In Asia, Europe, and Africa, the reporting risk of dementia-related AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan was lower compared to ARBs (adjusted ROR, 0.57 [95% CI 0.31-1.01]; adjusted ROR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.69-1.14]; adjusted ROR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.27-0.61], respectively). In Latin America and Oceania, the reporting risk of dementia-related AEs associated with sacubitril/valsartan was similar to that associated with ARBs (adjusted ROR, 1.04 [95% CI 0.75-1.44]; adjusted ROR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.31-3.37], respectively). On the contrary, in North America, the reporting risk associated with sacubitril/valsartan was higher compared to ARBs (adjusted ROR, 1.29 [95% CI 1.10-1.53]). Although the ROR value did not meet the criteria for signal detection, the significantly greater than 1 ROR observed in North America suggests that caution may be warranted regarding potential dementia-related adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan.

In recent years, the field of analytical chemistry has witnessed a notable shift towards the adoption of greener chromatographic methods, aiming to minimize the environmental impact. An effective strategy involves substituting conventional harmful organic solvents with environmentally friendly alternatives, reducing the use of hazardous chemicals that contribute to environmental concerns. However, separating drug substances without the use of buffers and organic solvents presence is a big challenge. To overcome this challenge, a combination of quality-by-design (QbD) and green analytical chemistry (GAC) was employed in this study for method development. A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was successfully developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Nebivolol hydrochloride, Telmisartan, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate. The method utilized a mobile phase composed of a mixture of 0.1 % formic acid in water (pH: 2.5) and ethanol. A regular octadecyl silica (ODS) column was employed, and UV detection at 220 nm was utilized. The method exhibited linearity within the concentration range of 25-75 μg/mL for Telmisartan and 150-450 μg/mL for Nebivolol Hydrochloride, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate and the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.999 for all the analytes. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were determined as 0.01 and 0.04 μg/mL for Telmisartan, 0.06 and 0.20 μg/mL for Nebivolol Hydrochloride, 0.08 and 0.25 μg/mL for Amlodipine besylate, and 0.14 and 0.46 μg/mL for Valsartan, respectively. The developed method underwent thorough validation, encompassing various parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, robustness, and ruggedness. The mean recovery values were observed to range between 98.86 % and 99.89 %. The accuracy demonstrated was consistently above 98.98 % for both intra-day and inter-day precisions were with the relative standard deviations less than 2 %. To establish its robustness, a quality-by-design-based experimental design (DoE) approach was implemented. Additionally, the method\'s environmental friendliness was evaluated using the Analytical Greenness metric (AGREE) an analytical eco scale, both confirming its alignment with sustainable practices and reduced ecological impact. The sustainability of the solvent used in the current study was evaluated by Green Solvents Selecting Tool (GSST) Further, the developed method greenness was evaluated with the green analytical tools such as Analytical method greenness score (AMGS) and using the recently released White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) using RGB assessment tool. By employing this greener approach to chromatography method, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts in analytical chemistry to promote sustainable practices and minimize the environmental footprint of analytical methods.

Here, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), used for the measurement of cardiovascular drugs, is compared against conventional dried blood spot (DBS) card sampling to evaluate adherence to prescribed medication. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an attractive alternative to plasma sampling for routine drug monitoring and potentially overcomes haematocrit issues associated with quantitative bioanalysis of conventional dried blood spots. A quantitative VAMS-based LC-HRAM MS assay for atenolol, lisinopril, simvastatin and valsartan was developed and validated. The assay demonstrated acceptable linearity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery and insignificant matrix effects with no impact of haematocrit on assay accuracy. Volunteers provided both VAMS and DBS 903 card samples (the current standard) to allow comparison of the two methods and demonstrate the potential utility of VAMS. Analysis of VAMS samples correctly identified drugs in volunteers known to be adherent, and found no false positives from volunteers known to be taking no medication. There was a strong correlation between the two sampling systems confirming the utility of VAMS. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in deciding how to proceed with treatment in the event of poor improvement in patient health. VAMS could offer a potentially more efficient method of sample collection, with fewer rejected samples than the DBS approach.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effects and mechanisms of LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of peritoneal mesothelial cells and on macrophage M2 polarization.
UNASSIGNED: We examined the effects of LCZ696 in a 4.25% high glucose peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF)-induced peritoneal fibrosis (PF) mouse model, and explored the mechanisms of LCZ696 on human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) stimulated by TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) and on Raw264.7 cells stimulated by IL-4 (10 ng/mL). To further elucidate the mechanism, we treated HPMCs with the conditioned medium of Raw264.7 cells.
UNASSIGNED: LCZ696 effectively improved PF and inhibited the process of EMT in PDF mice. In vitro, LCZ696 also significantly alleviated the EMT of TGF-β1 induced HPMCs, although there was no statistically significant difference when compared to the Valsartan treatment group. Moreover, LCZ696 ameliorates the increased expression of Snail and Slug, two nuclear transcription factors that drive the EMT. Mechanistically, TGF-β1 increased the expression of TGFβRI, p-Smad3, p-PDGFRβ and p-EGFR, while treatment with LCZ696 abrogated the activation of TGF-β/Smad3, PDGFRβ and EGFR signaling pathways. Additionally, exposure of Raw264.7 to IL-4 results in increasing expression of Arginase-1, CD163 and p-STAT6. Treatment with LCZ696 inhibited IL-4-elicited M2 macrophage polarization by inactivating the STAT6 signaling pathway. Furthermore, we observed that LCZ696 inhibits EMT by blocking TGF-β1 secretion from M2 macrophages.
UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrated that LCZ696 improves PF and ameliorates TGF-β1-induced EMT of HPMCs by blocking TGF-β/Smad3, PDGFRβ and EGFR pathways. Meanwhile, LCZ696 also inhibits M2 macrophage polarization by regulating STAT6 pathway.

UNASSIGNED: Randomized clinical trials have shown that sacubitril-valsartan reduces the risks of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs or ARBs) in patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness study included patients who were 18 years or older with HFrEF, enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, and survived at least 90 days receiving in-center hemodialysis from July 8, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Patients were excluded for less than 180 days of continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D primary payer coverage or prior dispensing of sacubitril-valsartan. Data analysis was conducted from September 23, 2023, to June 25, 2024.
UNASSIGNED: New use of sacubitril-valsartan vs new or continued use of ACEIs or ARBs.
UNASSIGNED: The associations between initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models in a propensity score-matched sample.
UNASSIGNED: Participants included 1:1 matched pairs of 1434 sacubitril-valsartan users and 1434 ACEI or ARB users (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years). Of the 2868 matched participants, 996 (65%) were male; 987 (34%) were Black or African American and 1677 (58%) were White; and median dialysis vintage was 3.8 (IQR, 1.8-6.3) years. The median follow-up was 0.9 (IQR, 0.4-1.7) years. Sacubitril-valsartan (vs ACEI or ARB) therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]) or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). There was a decrease in hyperkalemia (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.81]) and no difference in hypotension (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.19]). Only 195 participants (14%) ever received the maximum combination dose of sacubitril (97 mg twice daily) and valsartan (103 mg twice daily).
UNASSIGNED: In this comparative effectiveness study of patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis, sacubitril-valsartan therapy was associated with beneficial effects in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization.

Since 2014, sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto®) is widely prescribed for heart failure. Despite neprilysin inhibition\'s benefits in heart failure, concerns about potential amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation and Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) risk have persisted. This narrative review, a decade post-approval, evaluates the risk of amyloid pathology and neurocognitive disorders in long-term sacubitril/valsartan use. Clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacovigilance data do not indicate an increased risk of cognitive decline. In patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan blood-based amyloid biomarkers show perturbations, while neuroimaging biomarkers reveal no significant increase in amyloid load. Despite a theoretical risk of amyloid accumulation and AD under treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, current clinical data appears reassuring, and there is no signal indicating an increased risk of cognitive decline, but a perturbation of amyloid blood-based biomarkers, which implies great caution when interpreting biomarkers in this context.

UNASSIGNED: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) performance of individuals with subclinical and early stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have not been systematically studied. Improved understanding will inform the natural history of HCM and factors influencing well-being.
UNASSIGNED: VANISH trial (Valsartan for Attenuating Disease Evolution in Early Sarcomeric HCM) participants with early stage sarcomeric HCM (primary analysis cohort) and subclinical HCM (sarcomere variant without left ventricular hypertrophy comprising the exploratory cohort) who completed baseline and year 2 HRQOL assessment via the pediatric quality of life inventory and CPET were studied. Metrics correlating with baseline HRQOL and CPET performance were identified. The impact of valsartan treatment on these measures was analyzed in the early stage cohort.
UNASSIGNED: Two hundred participants were included: 166 with early stage HCM (mean age, 23±10 years; 40% female; 97% White; and 92% New York Heart Association class I) and 34 subclinical sarcomere variant carriers (mean age, 16±5 years; 50% female; and 100% White). Baseline HRQOL was good in both cohorts, although slightly better in subclinical HCM (composite pediatric quality of life score 84.6±10.6 versus 90.2±9.8; P=0.005). Both cohorts demonstrated mildly reduced functional status (mean percent predicted peak oxygen uptake 73±16 versus 78±12 mL/kg per minute; P=0.18). Percent predicted peak oxygen uptake and peak oxygen pulse correlated with HRQOL. Valsartan improved physical HRQOL in early stage HCM (adjusted mean change in pediatric quality of life score +4.1 versus placebo; P=0.01) but did not significantly impact CPET performance.
UNASSIGNED: Functional capacity can be impaired in young, healthy people with early stage HCM, despite New York Heart Association class I status and good HRQOL. Peak oxygen uptake was similarly decreased in subclinical HCM despite normal left ventricular wall thickness and excellent HRQOL. Valsartan improved physical pediatric quality of life scores but did not significantly impact CPET performance. Further studies are needed for validation and to understand how to improve patient experience.
UNASSIGNED: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01912534.

UNASSIGNED: The incidence of hypertension and clinical complications (e.g., heart, cerebrovascular and kidney injury) is increasing worldwide. It is widely known that a relatively large dose of valsartan (320 mg) could alleviate clinical complications. The current network meta-analysis assessed which drug could be combined with a relatively large dose of valsartan to control blood pressure (BP) more effectively. And which combination therapy with different dosages of valsartan did not induce excessive BP reduction with increasing dosages of valsartan.
UNASSIGNED: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CSTJ databases were searched from inception to October 2022 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategies included concepts related to hypertension and two-drug combination therapy of different doses of valsartan, and there were no language or data restrictions. The outcomes included adverse effects and changes in systolic BP and diastolic BP. Permanent discontinuations related to treatment were the most accurate and objective measure of adverse effects. The common adverse effects of most studies (i.e., dizziness, headache, nasopharyngitis, asthenia and urticaria) were also included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. ADDIS and STATA were used for Bayesian model network meta-calculation.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-four RCTs were included involving 26,752 patients, and the interventions included different doses of valsartan combined with various types and doses of drugs. Among many combination therapies, the combination of valsartan 320 mg with amlodipine 10 mg (p < 0.01) had the best antihypertensive effect without significant adverse effects. Compared with valsartan 80 mg and 160 mg, valsartan 320 mg combined with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (p > 0.05) did not further reduce BP and was not shown to increase the incidence of adverse effects.
UNASSIGNED: Combination therapy with a relatively large dose of valsartan could control BP and improve clinical complications effectively. However, for hypertensive patients with different treatment requirements, specific choices should be made regarding whether to control BP, treat clinical complications, or both.

Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) that has been shown in multiple clinical trials to have clinical benefits and is recommended by major clinical management guidelines as a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The most significant benefit that was observed in clinical trials is its effect in reducing hospital readmissions. However, little evidence supports its effectiveness in practice, especially in Saudi Arabia. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted using the patient medical records at 2 tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years old) with a confirmed diagnosis of HFrEF who were discharged on either sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in addition to the other recommended therapy for HFrEF. The primary endpoint was the all-cause 30-day readmission rate. The secondary endpoints included all-cause readmissions at 60-day, 90-day, and 12 months. Additionally, 30-day, 60-day, and 90-day readmissions due to HF were evaluated. A total of 398 patients were included in our analysis; 199 (50.0%) received sacubitril/valsartan (group 1), and 199 (50.0%) received ACEI/ARB (group 2). Our results showed that all-cause 30-day readmissions in group 1 were significantly lower than in group 2 (7% vs 25.0%, RR 0.28, 95% Cl 0.16-0.49; P < .001). Additionally, the secondary outcomes showed significantly fewer 60-day, 90-day, and 12-month all-cause readmissions were identified in group 1 compared to group 2 (11% vs 30.7%, RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.56; P < .001), (11.6%. vs 32.6%, RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23-0.55; P < .001) and (23.6% vs 51.2%, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.62; P < .001), respectively. Furthermore, HF readmissions at 30-day, 60-day, and 90-day in group 1 were significantly lower than in group 2 (P < .05). Sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of HFrEF is associated with a significantly lower rate of all-cause readmission as well as HF readmissions compared to ACEI/ARB. These benefits extend up to 12 months post-discharge.

Recently, a mild elevation of the blood ketone levels was found to exert multifaceted cardioprotective effects. To investigate the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) on the blood ketone body levels, 46 stable pre-heart failure (HF)/HF patients were studied, including 23 who switched from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) to ARNIs (ARNI group) and 23 who continued treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs (control group). At baseline, there were no significant differences in the total ketone body (TKB) levels between the two groups. Three months later, the TKB levels in the ARNI group were higher than the baseline values (baseline to 3 months: 71 [51, 122] to 92 [61, 270] μmol/L, P < 0.01). In the control group, no significant change was observed between the baseline and 3 months later. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the initiation of ARNI and an increase in the blood non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels at 3 months increased the percentage changes in the TKB levels from baseline to 3 months (%ΔTKB level) (initiation of ARNI: P = 0.017, NEFA level at 3 months: P < 0.001). These results indicate that ARNI administration induces a mild elevation of the blood TKB levels in pre-HF/HF patients.