VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography

VCTE,振动控制瞬态弹性成像
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近开发了NAFLD失代偿风险评分(Iowa模型),用于识别非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者发生肝脏事件的风险最高,使用三个变量-年龄,血小板计数,和糖尿病。
    我们对爱荷华州模型进行了外部验证,并将其与现有的非侵入性模型进行了比较。
    我们纳入了波士顿医疗中心的249名NAFLD患者,波士顿,马萨诸塞州,外部验证队列中的949例患者和内部/外部联合验证队列中的949例患者。主要结果是肝脏事件的发展(腹水,肝性脑病,食管或胃静脉曲张,或肝细胞癌)。我们使用Cox比例风险来分析Iowa模型在外部验证(https://uihc.org/非酒精性脂肪肝疾病失代偿风险评分计算器)中预测肝脏事件的能力。我们将爱荷华州模型的性能与AST与血小板比率指数(APRI)进行了比较,NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS),和合并队列中的FIB-4指数。
    Iowa模型显著预测了肝脏事件的发展,风险比为2.5[95%置信区间(CI)1.7-3.9,P<0.001],受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.87(CI0.83-0.91)。爱荷华州模型的AUROC(0.88,CI:0.85-0.92)与FIB-4指数(0.87,CI:0.83-0.91)相当,高于NFS(0.66,CI:0.63-0.69)和APRI(0.76,CI:0.73-0.79)。
    在城市,种族和种族不同的人口,Iowa模型在确定肝脏相关并发症风险较高的NAFLD患者方面表现良好.该模型提供发生肝脏事件的个体概率,并识别需要早期干预的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The NAFLD decompensation risk score (the Iowa Model) was recently developed to identify patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) at highest risk of developing hepatic events using three variables-age, platelet count, and diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an external validation of the Iowa Model and compared it to existing non-invasive models.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 249 patients with NAFLD at Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, in the external validation cohort and 949 patients in the combined internal/external validation cohort. The primary outcome was the development of hepatic events (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal or gastric varices, or hepatocellular carcinoma). We used Cox proportional hazards to analyze the ability of the Iowa Model to predict hepatic events in the external validation (https://uihc.org/non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-decompensation-risk-score-calculator). We compared the performance of the Iowa Model to the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and the FIB-4 index in the combined cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: The Iowa Model significantly predicted the development of hepatic events with hazard ratio of 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.9, P < 0.001] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87 (CI 0.83-0.91). The AUROC of the Iowa Model (0.88, CI: 0.85-0.92) was comparable to the FIB-4 index (0.87, CI: 0.83-0.91) and higher than NFS (0.66, CI: 0.63-0.69) and APRI (0.76, CI: 0.73-0.79).
    UNASSIGNED: In an urban, racially and ethnically diverse population, the Iowa Model performed well to identify NAFLD patients at higher risk for liver-related complications. The model provides the individual probability of developing hepatic events and identifies patients in need of early intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精相关性肝炎(AH)是黄疸的临床综合征,腹痛,和厌食症由于长期大量饮酒。AH与基因表达的变化有关,细胞因子,免疫反应,和肠道微生物组。在AH中诊断和预测的生物标志物有限,但是一些非侵入性生物标志物正在出现。在这次审查中,临床风险分层算法,有希望的AH生物标志物,如细胞角蛋白18片段,遗传多态性,和microRNA将被审查。
    Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a clinical syndrome of jaundice, abdominal pain, and anorexia due to prolonged heavy alcohol intake. AH is associated with changes in gene expression, cytokines, immune response, and the gut microbiome. There are limited biomarkers to diagnose and prognosticate in AH, but several non-invasive biomarkers are emerging. In this review, clinical risk-stratifying algorithms, promising AH biomarkers like cytokeratin-18 fragments, genetic polymorphisms, and microRNAs will be reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者的病程可变且通常为进行性,与胆道和实质改变有关。这些变化通常通过磁共振成像(MRI)来评估,包括磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)的定性评估。我们的目的是研究新的客观定量MRCP指标与预后评分和患者预后的关系。
    UASSIGNED:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括77例具有基线MRCP图像的大导管PSC个体,对其进行后处理以使用MRCP+™获得胆管的定量测量。参与者\'ANALI得分,通过振动控制的瞬时弹性成像,肝脏硬度,在基线时收集生化指标。无不良结局生存率测量为无失代偿期肝硬化,肝移植,或超过12年的肝脏相关死亡。通过Cox回归模型评估MRCP衍生指标的预后价值。
    未经证实:在总共386名患者-年中,16例失代偿,2LTs,并记录5例肝脏相关死亡。在基线,约50%的患者被归类为有发生疾病并发症的风险.MRCP+度量,特别是那些描述胆管扩张的严重程度,与所有预后因素相关。单变量分析表明,代表管道直径的MRCP+指标,扩张,导管狭窄和/或扩张的百分比与生存率相关。在多变量调整分析中,中位导管直径与生存显著相关(风险比10.9,95%CI1.3-90.3).
    未经证实:PSC患者的MRCP+指标与生化指标相关,弹性成像,和放射学预后评分,并预测无不良结局的生存。
    未经批准:在这项研究中,我们在原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者中评估了由软件工具(MRCP+)自动提供的新型客观定量MRCP指标与预后评分和患者结局的相关性.我们观察到PSC患者的MRCP+指标与生化指标相关,弹性成像,和放射学预后评分,并预测无不良结局的生存。
    UNASSIGNED: People with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have a variable and often progressive disease course that is associated with biliary and parenchymal changes. These changes are typically assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including qualitative assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Our aim was to study the association of novel objective quantitative MRCP metrics with prognostic scores and patient outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective study including 77 individuals with large-duct PSC with baseline MRCP images, which were postprocessed to obtain quantitative measures of bile ducts using MRCP+™. The participants\' ANALI scores, liver stiffness by vibration-controlled transient elastography, and biochemical indices were collected at baseline. Adverse outcome-free survival was measured as the absence of decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplantation (LT), or liver-related death over a 12-year period. The prognostic value of MRCP+-derived metrics was assessed by Cox regression modelling.
    UNASSIGNED: During a total of 386 patients-years, 16 cases of decompensation, 2 LTs, and 5 liver-related deaths were recorded. At baseline, around 50% of the patients were classified as being at risk of developing disease complications. MRCP+ metrics, particularly those describing the severity of bile duct dilatations, were correlated with all prognostic factors. Univariate analysis showed that MRCP+ metrics representing duct diameter, dilatations, and the percentage of ducts with strictures and/or dilatations were associated with survival. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, the median duct diameter was significantly associated with survival (hazard ratio 10.9, 95% CI 1.3-90.3).
    UNASSIGNED: MRCP+ metrics in people with PSC correlate with biochemical, elastographic, and radiological prognostic scores and are predictive of adverse outcome-free survival.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we assessed in people with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) the association of novel objective quantitative MRCP metrics automatically provided by a software tool (MRCP+) with prognostic scores and patient outcomes. We observed that MRCP+ metrics in people with PSC correlate with biochemical, elastographic, and radiological prognostic scores and are predictive of adverse outcome-free survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:COVID-19大流行对全球卫生系统和许多慢性疾病产生了重大负面影响。我们旨在评估大流行第一年对NAFLD肝硬化患者预后的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:我们在加泰罗尼亚的四家大学医院进行了一项前后研究,西班牙。研究子期分为大流行前(2019年3月至2020年2月)与大流行(2020年3月-2021年2月)。主要结果是首次肝脏相关事件(LRE)的发生率。还评估了总体临床结果(LREs+心血管疾病+全因死亡率)。
    未经授权:共纳入354名患者,所有患者在研究期开始时都获得了补偿;83例患者(23.5%)既往有肝功能失代偿史.平均年龄为67.3岁,48.3%为女性。BMI中位数为31.2kg/m2,72.8%的患者存在2型糖尿病。大流行前和大流行期的首次LRE发生率分别为7.4%和11.3%(p=0.12),分别。而在大流行期,总体事件的发生率显著较高(9.9%vs.17.8%;p=0.009),这与COVID-19相关死亡密切相关.在大流行期间,代谢状态恶化的比率显着升高(38.4%vs.46.1%;p=0.041),然而,这与大流行期间首次LRE的风险无关,而2型糖尿病(比值比[OR]3.77;95%CI1.15-12.32;p=0.028),在多变量分析中,白蛋白<4g/L(OR4.43;95%CI1.76-11.17;p=0.002)和纤维化-4评分>2.67(OR15.74;95%CI2.01-123.22;p=0.009)被确定为危险因素。
    未经评估:总的来说,NAFLD肝硬化患者在大流行的第一年肝脏相关结局并不较差.卫生系统准备似乎是确保NAFLD肝硬化患者在健康危机期间获得适当护理的关键。
    未经评估:由COVID-19大流行引起的流动性限制和社会压力导致饮酒增加和代谢控制恶化(例如,体重增加,在许多国家/地区,很大一部分人口对糖尿病的控制不佳)。我们的目的是分析肝硬化患者是否因非酒精性脂肪性肝病,特别容易受到这种生活方式改变的人,在大流行的第一年受到重大影响。我们比较了大流行前一年和后一年的354例患者的临床情况。我们发现,尽管在大流行的第一年后代谢控制确实更糟,患者的临床结果更差,后者主要是由于非肝脏原因,即COVID-19本身。此外,在大流行的第一年,向这些患者提供的护理并未恶化。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major negative impact on health systems and many chronic diseases globally. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the first year of the pandemic on the outcomes of people with NAFLD cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a before-after study in four University hospitals in Catalonia, Spain. Study subperiods were divided into Pre-pandemic (March/2019-February/2020) vs. Pandemic (March/2020-February/2021). The primary outcome was the rate of first liver-related event (LRE). Overall clinical outcomes (LREs plus cardiovascular plus all-cause mortality) were also assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 354 patients were included, all of whom were compensated at the beginning of the study period; 83 individuals (23.5%) had a history of prior hepatic decompensation. Mean age was 67.3 years and 48.3% were female. Median BMI was 31.2 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes was present in 72.8% of patients. The rates of first LRE in the Pre-pandemic and Pandemic periods were 7.4% and 11.3% (p = 0.12), respectively. Whilst the rate of overall events was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (9.9% vs. 17.8%; p = 0.009), this was strongly associated with COVID-19-related deaths. The rate of worsened metabolic status was significantly higher in the Pandemic period (38.4% vs. 46.1%; p = 0.041), yet this was not associated with the risk of first LRE during the Pandemic period, whereas type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.77; 95% CI 1.15-12.32; p = 0.028), albumin <4 g/L (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.76-11.17; p = 0.002) and Fibrosis-4 score >2.67 (OR 15.74; 95% CI 2.01-123.22; p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors in the multivariable analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, people with NAFLD cirrhosis did not present poorer liver-related outcomes during the first year of the pandemic. Health system preparedness seems key to ensure that people with NAFLD cirrhosis receive appropriate care during health crises.
    UNASSIGNED: Mobility restrictions and social stress induced by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to increased alcohol drinking and worsened metabolic control (e.g., weight gain, poor control of diabetes) in a large proportion of the population in many countries. We aimed to analyze whether people with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, who are particularly vulnerable to such lifestyle modifications, were significantly impacted during the first year of the pandemic. We compared the clinical situation of 354 patients one year before the pandemic and one year after. We found that although metabolic control was indeed worse after the first year of the pandemic and patients presented worse clinical outcomes, the latter was mostly due to non-liver causes, namely COVID-19 itself. Moreover, the care provided to these patients did not worsen during the first year of the pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:Alpha-1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏是由SERPINA1突变引起的,最常见的是Pi*Z变体的纯合性,并可表现为肝脏疾病。而杂合性Pi*Z(Pi*MZ)与肝硬化风险增加有关,Pi*MZ基因型是否与代偿性肝硬化患者失代偿率增加相关尚不清楚。
    UNASSIGNED:这是一项对密歇根基因组学计划参与者基线代偿性肝硬化的回顾性研究。主要预测因子是Pi*MZ或Pi*MS基因型(vs.Pi*MM)。主要结果是肝失代偿伴腹水,肝性脑病,或者静脉曲张出血,或肝脏相关死亡或肝移植的联合终点,两者都是用Fine-Gray竞争风险模型建模的。
    UASSIGNED:我们纳入了576名基线代偿性肝硬化患者,他们接受了基因分型,其中474人有Pi*MM,49有Pi*MZ,52人具有Pi*MS基因型。与Pi*MM基因型相比,Pi*MZ与肝失代偿率增加相关(风险比1.81;95%CI1.22-2.69;p=0.003)和肝移植或肝脏相关死亡(风险比2.07;95%CI1.21-3.52;p=0.078)。这些关联在调整潜在肝脏疾病的严重程度后仍然显着,并且在基于病因的亚组分析中是稳健的,性别,肥胖,和糖尿病状态。Pi*MS与失代偿或死亡/移植无关。
    未经证实:SERPINA1Pi*MZ基因型与基线代偿性肝硬化患者肝失代偿率增加和无移植生存率降低相关。
    未经证实:SERPINA1基因有一个突变,称为Pi*MZ,增加了肝脏瘢痕形成(肝硬化)的风险;然而,不知道如果有人已经患有肝硬化,Pi*MZ会有什么影响。在这项研究中,我们发现,患有肝硬化和Pi*MZ的人比没有突变的人更快地发生肝硬化并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is caused by mutations in SERPINA1, most commonly homozygosity for the Pi∗Z variant, and can present as liver disease. While heterozygosity for Pi∗Z (Pi∗MZ) is linked to increased risk of cirrhosis, whether the Pi∗MZ genotype is associated with an increased rate of decompensation among patients who already have compensated cirrhosis is not known.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of Michigan Genomics Initiative participants with baseline compensated cirrhosis. The primary predictors were Pi∗MZ or Pi∗MS genotype (vs. Pi∗MM). The primary outcomes were hepatic decompensation with ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding, or the combined endpoint of liver-related death or liver transplant, both modeled with Fine-Gray competing risk models.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 576 patients with baseline compensated cirrhosis who had undergone genotyping, of whom 474 had Pi∗MM, 49 had Pi∗MZ, and 52 had Pi∗MS genotypes. Compared to Pi∗MM genotype, Pi∗MZ was associated with increased rates of hepatic decompensation (hazard ratio 1.81; 95% CI 1.22-2.69; p = 0.003) and liver transplant or liver-related death (hazard ratio 2.07; 95% CI 1.21-3.52; p = 0.078). These associations remained significant after adjustment for severity of underlying liver disease, and were robust across subgroup analyses based on etiology, sex, obesity, and diabetes status. Pi∗MS was not associated with decompensation or death/transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: The SERPINA1 Pi∗MZ genotype is associated with an increased rate of hepatic decompensation and decreased transplant-free survival among patients with baseline compensated cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a mutation in the gene SERPINA1 called Pi∗MZ which increases risk of liver scarring (cirrhosis); however, it is not known what effect Pi∗MZ has if someone already has cirrhosis. In this study, we found that people who had cirrhosis and Pi∗MZ developed complications from cirrhosis faster than those who did not have the mutation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)正迅速成为肝病的最常见原因之一。NAFLD的进行性亚型,非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH),导致肝硬化,肝细胞癌,和死亡率。纤维化是并发症的最强预测因子。由于肝活检的侵入性,非侵入性检测方法已经出现,以检测纤维化和预测结果。在这些模式中,磁共振弹性成像(MRE)已证明检测纤维化的最高准确性。在这次审查中,我们将关注关于MRE和肝纤维化的新数据,肝硬化,和门静脉高压症的NAFLD。
    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly becoming one of the most common causes of liver disease. The progressive subtype of NAFLD, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), leads to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality. Fibrosis is the strongest predictor for complications. Due to the invasive nature of liver biopsy, noninvasive testing methods have emerged to detect fibrosis and predict outcomes. Of these modalities, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has demonstrated the highest accuracy to detect fibrosis. In this review, we will focus on the emerging data regarding MRE and liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension in NAFLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Despite availability of diagnostic and management reference guidelines outlining standard of care for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), national and regional guidelines are lacking, resulting in variations in patient management between regions. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics and management data from the Adelphi Real World NASH Disease Specific Programme™ for patients with NASH in the EU5, Canada, and the Middle East to identify gaps between real-world practice and that advocated by reference guidelines, irrespective of clinician awareness or consultation of guidelines.
    METHODS: We performed an analysis of physicians (hepatologists, gastroenterologists, diabetologists) and their patients diagnosed with NASH. Physicians completed patient record forms for the next 5 consulting patients, collecting information on patient care, including diagnosis and disease management.
    RESULTS: A total of 429 physicians provided data for 2,267 patients with NASH (EU5, n = 1,844; Canada, n = 130; Middle East, n = 293). Patient age, physician-defined fibrosis stage, comorbidities and symptoms, and diagnostic testing practices highlighted statistically significant differences across regions. Substantial disconnects between reference guidelines and real-world practice were observed. Use of liver function tests, non-invasive tests (e.g. ultrasound and transient elastography), and tests to exclude other conditions was suboptimal. Although lifestyle advice was widely provided, patients were less commonly referred to diet, exercise, and lifestyle specialists. Two-thirds of patients were receiving off-label treatment for NASH or associated underlying conditions with the aim of improving NASH, most commonly statins, metformin, and vitamin E.
    CONCLUSIONS: Real-world NASH management approaches differ across regions and from proposed standard of care represented by reference multidisciplinary guidelines. Establishment and awareness of, and adherence to regional and national guidelines may improve identification and management of patients with NASH and potentially improve outcomes in this population.
    BACKGROUND: Although reference guidelines are available to guide the management of patients with NASH, these are not widely used and there is a lack of national guidelines. Our study shows how clinical practice in the EU, Canada, and Middle East differs from proposed standard of care, particularly relating to how patients are diagnosed and treated. Wider establishment of, awareness of, and reference to guidelines may improve how physicians identify and manage patients with NASH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝癌风险测试算法(LCR1-LCR2)是一种多分析物血液测试,结合了参与肝细胞修复的蛋白质(载脂蛋白A1和触珠蛋白),已知肝细胞癌(HCC)危险因素(性别,年龄,和γ-谷氨酰转移酶),纤维化标志物(α2-巨球蛋白)和甲胎蛋白(AFP),肝癌的特异性标志物。目的是在接受或未接受抗病毒药物治疗的慢性HCV(CHC)患者中外部验证LCR1-LCR2。
    纳入前的患者来自Hegather队列,法国成人CHC患者的多中心前瞻性研究。LCR1-LCR2在具有测试成分和AFP的患者中进行回顾性评估,在基线可用。共同主要研究结果是根据预定的LCR1-LCR2截止值,LCR1-LCR2对5年HCC发生和无HCC生存的阴性预测值(NPV)。根据风险协变量和对HCV治疗的反应调整了截止值,并使用时间依赖性比例风险模型进行量化。
    总共,4903名患者,1,026(21.9%)与基线肝硬化,包括在研究中。随访患者的中位数为5.7年(IQR4.2-11.3)。共有3,788/4,903(77.3%)患者具有持续的病毒学应答。5年有137例HCC,随访结束时214例。与高风险LCR1-LCR2的113/1,148例患者相比,低风险LCR1-LCR2的24/3,755例患者在5年发生HCC。NPV为99.4%(95%CI99.1-99.6)。类似的发现(危险比,10.8;95%CI,8.1-14.3;p<0.001)在校正暴露于抗病毒药物后获得,年龄,性别,地理起源,HCV基因型3,饮酒,和2型糖尿病。
    结果表明,LCR1-LCR2可用于成功识别5年时HCC风险极低的HCV患者。
    肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球癌症相关死亡的第四大原因,也是许多国家增长最快的癌症死亡原因。我们构建并内部验证了一种新的多分析物血液测试来评估这种肝癌风险(LCR1-LCR2)。这项研究证实了LCR1-LCR2在法国国家队列中慢性HCV患者中的表现,以及它在5年内识别肝癌风险非常低的患者的能力。
    该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01953458)注册。
    OBJECTIVE: The Liver Cancer Risk test algorithm (LCR1-LCR2) is a multianalyte blood test combining proteins involved in liver cell repair (apolipoprotein-A1 and haptoglobin), known hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors (sex, age, and gamma-glutamyl transferase), a marker of fibrosis (alpha2-macroglobulin) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), a specific marker of HCC. The aim was to externally validate the LCR1-LCR2 in patients with chronic HCV (CHC) treated or not with antivirals.
    METHODS: Pre-included patients were from the Hepather cohort, a multicentre prospective study in adult patients with CHC in France. LCR1-LCR2 was assessed retrospectively in patients with the test components and AFP, available at baseline. The co-primary study outcome was the negative predictive value (NPV) of LCR1-LCR2 for the occurrence of HCC at 5 years and for survival without HCC according to the predetermined LCR1-LCR2 cut-offs. The cut-offs were adjusted for risk covariables and for the response to HCV treatment, and were quantified using time-dependent proportional hazards models.
    RESULTS: In total, 4,903 patients, 1,026 (21.9%) with baseline cirrhosis, were included in the study. Patients were followed for a median of 5.7 (IQR 4.2-11.3) years. A total of 3,788/4,903 (77.3%) patients had a sustained virological response. There were 137 cases of HCC at 5 years and 214 at the end of follow-up. HCC occurred at 5 years in 24/3,755 patients with low-risk LCR1-LCR2 compared with 113/1,148 patients with high-risk LCR1-LCR2. The NPV was 99.4% (95% CI 99.1-99.6). Similar findings (hazard ratio, 10.8; 95% CI, 8.1-14.3; p <0.001) were obtained after adjustment for exposure to antivirals, age, sex, geographical origin, HCV genotype 3, alcohol consumption, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that LCR1-LCR2 can be used to successfully identify patients with HCV at very low risk of HCC at 5 years.
    BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and the fastest growing cause of cancer death in many countries. We constructed and internally validated a new multianalyte blood test to assess this Liver Cancer Risk (LCR1-LCR2). This study confirmed the performance of LCR1-LCR2 in patients with chronic HCV in the national French cohort Hepather, and its ability to identify patients at a very low risk of HCC at 5 years.
    BACKGROUND: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01953458).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    线粒体是细胞中形成活性氧(ROS)的主要细胞器,线粒体功能障碍已被描述为胆汁淤积性肝病发病的关键因素。甲基化控制的J蛋白(MCJ)是一种线粒体蛋白,与电子传递链的复合物I相互作用并抑制其功能。尚未探索MCJ在胆汁淤积病理中的相关性。
    我们研究了MCJ与慢性胆汁淤积性肝病患者肝活检中胆汁淤积性肝损伤之间的关系,以及从WT和MCJ-KO小鼠获得的肝脏和原代肝细胞。胆管结扎(BDL)作为胆汁淤积的动物模型,和原代肝细胞用毒性剂量的胆汁酸处理。我们评估了MCJ沉默治疗胆汁淤积诱导的肝损伤的效果。
    与正常肝组织相比,在慢性胆汁淤积性肝病患者的肝组织中检测到MCJ水平升高。同样,在老鼠模型中,肝脏MCJ水平升高。BDL之后,MCJ-KO动物表现出显著降低的炎症和凋亡。在胆汁酸诱导毒性的体外模型中,我们观察到,MCJ的损失保护小鼠原代肝细胞从胆汁酸诱导的线粒体ROS过度产生和ATP耗竭,使更高的细胞活力。最后,MCJ表达的体内抑制,在BDL之后,显示出减少的肝损伤和缓解的主要胆汁淤积特征。
    我们证明MCJ参与胆汁淤积性肝损伤的进展,我们的结果确定MCJ是减轻胆汁淤积引起的肝损伤的潜在治疗靶点。
    在这项研究中,我们研究了MCJ抑制线粒体呼吸链对胆汁酸诱导的肝毒性的影响。MCJ的丢失保护肝细胞免受凋亡,线粒体ROS过度生产,和ATP消耗作为胆汁酸毒性的结果。我们的结果确定MCJ是缓解胆汁淤积性肝病中肝损伤的潜在治疗靶点。
    OBJECTIVE: Mitochondria are the major organelles for the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cell, and mitochondrial dysfunction has been described as a key factor in the pathogenesis of cholestatic liver disease. The methylation-controlled J-protein (MCJ) is a mitochondrial protein that interacts with and represses the function of complex I of the electron transport chain. The relevance of MCJ in the pathology of cholestasis has not yet been explored.
    METHODS: We studied the relationship between MCJ and cholestasis-induced liver injury in liver biopsies from patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases, and in livers and primary hepatocytes obtained from WT and MCJ-KO mice. Bile duct ligation (BDL) was used as an animal model of cholestasis, and primary hepatocytes were treated with toxic doses of bile acids. We evaluated the effect of MCJ silencing for the treatment of cholestasis-induced liver injury.
    RESULTS: Elevated levels of MCJ were detected in the liver tissue of patients with chronic cholestatic liver disease when compared with normal liver tissue. Likewise, in mouse models, the hepatic levels of MCJ were increased. After BDL, MCJ-KO animals showed significantly decreased inflammation and apoptosis. In an in vitro model of bile-acid induced toxicity, we observed that the loss of MCJ protected mouse primary hepatocytes from bile acid-induced mitochondrial ROS overproduction and ATP depletion, enabling higher cell viability. Finally, the in vivo inhibition of the MCJ expression, following BDL, showed reduced liver injury and a mitigation of the main cholestatic characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that MCJ is involved in the progression of cholestatic liver injury, and our results identified MCJ as a potential therapeutic target to mitigate the liver injury caused by cholestasis.
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we examine the effect of mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition by MCJ on bile acid-induced liver toxicity. The loss of MCJ protects hepatocytes against apoptosis, mitochondrial ROS overproduction, and ATP depletion as a result of bile acid toxicity. Our results identify MCJ as a potential therapeutic target to mitigate liver injury in cholestatic liver diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝损伤的诊断评估是治疗慢性肝病(CLD)患者的重要步骤。虽然肝活检是评估坏死性炎症和纤维化的参考标准,侵入性手术的固有局限性,并且需要重复采样,已经导致了几种非侵入性测试(NIT)作为肝活检的替代品的发展。这种非侵入性方法主要包括生物(血清生物标记算法)或物理(组织硬度的成像评估)评估。然而,目前可用的NIT有几个限制,比如可变性,准确性不足和错误的风险因素,而新一代纤维化生物标志物的开发可能受到参考标准固有的抽样误差的限制。许多目前的NIT最初被开发用于诊断慢性丙型肝炎的显著纤维化,随后用于诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的晚期纤维化,并进一步适用于CLD的预测。一个重要的考虑因素是,尽管它们在临床实践中的使用越来越多,这些NIT不是为了反映纤维发生的动态过程,区分相邻的疾病阶段,诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝炎,或遵循由自然史或治疗干预引起的纤维化或疾病活动的纵向变化。了解这些NIT的优势和局限性将允许在临床背景下进行更明智的解释,其中NIT应被视为补充,而不是替代,肝活检。
    The diagnostic assessment of liver injury is an important step in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although liver biopsy is the reference standard for the assessment of necroinflammation and fibrosis, the inherent limitations of an invasive procedure, and need for repeat sampling, have led to the development of several non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to liver biopsy. Such non-invasive approaches mostly include biological (serum biomarker algorithms) or physical (imaging assessment of tissue stiffness) assessments. However, currently available NITs have several limitations, such as variability, inadequate accuracy and risk factors for error, while the development of a newer generation of biomarkers for fibrosis may be limited by the sampling error inherent to the reference standard. Many of the current NITs were initially developed to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, subsequently refined for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and further adapted for prognostication in CLD. An important consideration is that despite their increased use in clinical practice, these NITs were not designed to reflect the dynamic process of fibrogenesis, differentiate between adjacent disease stages, diagnose non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or follow longitudinal changes in fibrosis or disease activity caused by natural history or therapeutic intervention. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these NITs will allow for more judicious interpretation in the clinical context, where NITs should be viewed as complementary to, rather than as a replacement for, liver biopsy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号