BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a pivotal treatment for lymphoma patients. The BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) traditionally relies on cryopreservation, whereas the CEM regimen (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) has been optimized for short-duration administration without the need for cryopreservation. This study rigorously compares the clinical and safety profiles of the BeEAM and CEM regimens.
METHODS: A controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 58 lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT at the International Medical Center (IMC) in Cairo, Egypt. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BeEAM (n = 29) or CEM (n = 29) regimen, with an 18-month follow-up period. Clinical and safety outcomes were meticulously compared, focusing on time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets, side effects, length of hospitalization, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and survival rates.
RESULTS: The findings demonstrate a significant advantage for the CEM regimen. Neutrophil recovery was markedly faster in the CEM group, averaging 8.5 days compared to 14.5 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Platelet recovery was similarly expedited, with 11 days in the CEM group versus 23 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Hospitalization duration was substantially shorter for CEM patients, averaging 18.5 days compared to 30 days for those on BeEAM (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the CEM group at 96.55% (95% CI: 84.91-99.44%) compared to 79.31% (95% CI: 63.11-89.75%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.049). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably superior in the CEM group, at 86.21% (95% CI: 86.14-86.28%) versus 62.07% (95% CI: 61.94-62.20%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: The CEM regimen might demonstrate superiority over the BeEAM regimen, with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, reduced hospitalization time, and significantly improved overall and progression-free survival rates. Future studies with longer duration and larger sample sizes are warranted.
BACKGROUND: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT05813132 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05813132 ). (The first submitted registration date: is March 16, 2023).

UNASSIGNED: Humanized mouse models to recapitulate human biological systems still have limitations, such as the onset of lethal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a variable success rate, and the low accessibility of total body irradiation (TBI). Recently, mice modified with the CD47-SIRPA axis have been studied to improve humanized mouse models. However, such trials have been rarely applied in NOD mice. In this study, we created a novel mouse strain, NOD-CD47nullRag2nullIL-2rγnull (RTKO) mice, and applied it to generate humanized mice.
UNASSIGNED: Four-week-old female NOD-Rag2nullIL-2rγnull (RID) and RTKO mice pre-conditioned with TBI or busulfan (BSF) injection were used for generating human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engrafted humanized mice. Clinical signs were observed twice a week, and body weight was measured once a week. Flow cytometry for human leukocyte antigens was performed at intervals of four weeks or two weeks, and mice were sacrificed at 48 weeks after HSC injection.
UNASSIGNED: For a long period from 16 to 40 weeks post transplantation, the percentage of hCD45 was mostly maintained above 25% in all groups, and it was sustained the longest and highest in the RTKO BSF group. Reconstruction of human leukocytes, including hCD3, was also most prominent in the RTKO BSF group. Only two mice died before 40 weeks post transplantation in all groups, and there were no life-threatening GvHD lesions except in the dead mice. The occurrence of GvHD has been identified as mainly due to human T cells infiltrating tissues and their related cytokines.
UNASSIGNED: Humanized mouse models under all conditions applied in this study are considered suitable models for long-term experiments based on the improvement of human leukocytes reconstruction and the stable animal health. Especially, RTKO mice pretreated with BSF are expected to be a valuable platform not only for generating humanized mice but also for various immune research fields.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a medical procedure used mainly for the treatment of onco-hematologic disorders. Over the last two decades, autologous HSCT has been explored for the treatment of neurologic autoimmune diseases (ADs), being multiple sclerosis (MS) the most frequent indication in this setting. HSCT is characterized by the sequential administration of a conditioning regimen (CR) and the infusion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), previously collected either by the individual himself in the autologous transplant (AHSCT), or by a healthy donor in allogeneic HSCT. CR consists of the administration of high-dose chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation (TBI), that in ADs is usually associated with an immunodepleting serotherapy, either by an animal-derived polyclonal serum or a monoclonal antibody (MoAb), to induce intense immunosuppression. CRs are classified according to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) guidelines for HSCT in ADs in three grades of intensity according to the degrees of depletion of the hemato-lymphopoietic system induced. In the present chapter, after a brief overview of mobilization and CR adopted in the neurologic autoimmune setting, the role of chemotherapy in HSCT will be discussed, providing a historical perspective on the use of different regimens and summarizing the available evidence on potential associations between CR and outcomes.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a complex process, designed to replace the blood and lymphoid systems of a patient with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that have been previously collected and cryopreserved, derived from the same patient. The rationale of aHSCT in neurologic diseases is to eliminate self-reacting cell clones and induce self-tolerance through a profound renewal of the immune system. The steps analyzed in this chapter are conditioning, HSCs infusion, supportive care, and monitoring. Before transplantation, ablation of the hemato-lymphopoietic system is achieved with chemotherapy; this stage is known as the conditioning regimen. The EBMT guidelines support the use of \"intermediate intensity\" regimens, either cyclophosphamide 200mg/kg or BEAM (bis-chloroethyl-nitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), in combination with serotherapy that consists of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in most protocols. The infusion of HSC is performed through a central intravenous line, after being thawed at 37°C using either a water bath or a heat bath; in this phase, the prevention and management of infusion-related adverse events are crucial. The supportive care consists mainly of infection prophylaxis and treatment, administration of blood product transfusions, and nutritional and electrolyte support. The monitoring phase is focused on hematologic recovery and monitoring for early and late complications of aHSCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM), but few patients are eligible due to its high risk of treatment-related toxicity and relapse. Here, we report the feasibility and efficacy of allo-SCT after myeloablative conditioning with 8 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI) for reducing relapse of MM. We retrospectively analyzed data from 30 consecutive patients who received allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI at Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between 2012 and 2021. Median age at allo-SCT was 47 (range 31-61) years. Stem-cell sources were peripheral blood from an HLA-matched related donor (MRD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n=13), and cord blood (n=7). All patients received conditioning with 8 Gy of TBI combined with Flu/Mel (n=28) or others (n=2). Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 36.7% and 46.2%, respectively. Sixteen patients died during the observation period (12 of primary disease and 4 of treatment-related toxicity). Patients with VGPR or better before allo-SCT had significantly better PFS (p=0.009) and OS (p=0.01) than others. Patients who received MMUD cells tended to have better PFS than those with other cell sources. Our report showed that allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI is feasible, and the better PFS of MMUD suggests graft-versus-myeloma effects.

Despite the availability of many novel therapies for multiple myeloma, it remains an incurable disease with relapse fated in almost all patients. In the era of modern agents, second autologous stem cell transplantation still holds its role in patients relapsing after first-line autologous transplant. The authors reviewed a single-center experience with a second auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Thirty patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at the institution. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 86 months, and the median time between transplants was 59.1 months. Response before second ASCT was the following: CR - 11 cases, VGPR - 9 cases, PR - 10 cases. Most patients received reduced dose (140 mg/m2) of melphalan as a conditioning regimen for the second auto-SCT. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up time of 34 months after the second transplant, median progression-free survival was 24 months. The median PFS in the patients achieving CR or VGPR at day 100 after the second transplantation was 32 months. By 15 months, all patients achieved only partial remission progressed, with a median PFS of 8.5 months. During the follow-up period, no MDS or AML developed, and the frequency of second malignancy was also low, 3%. In conclusion, second autologous stem cell transplantation is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma in selected patients, though with a shorter PFS than in first remission.

UNASSIGNED: Cardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of cancer therapies that can interfere with quality of life and impact long-term survival in patients with cancer. Hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for many advanced hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes, however is associated with several short- and long-term adverse effects, including importantly, cardiovascular toxicities. The goal of this review article is to describe the cardiovascular events that may develop before, during, and after hematopoietic cell transplantation, review risk factors for short- and long-term cardiovascular toxicities, discuss approaches to cardiovascular risk stratification and evaluation, and highlight the research gaps in the consideration of cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Further understanding of cardiovascular events and the factors associated with cardiovascular disease will hopefully lead to novel interventions in managing and mitigating the significant long-term burden of late cardiovascular effects in transplant survivors.

Dexamethasone use during hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) conditioning varies between pediatric centers. This study aimed to estimate the difference in 1-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) between patients who did or did not receive dexamethasone during HCT conditioning. Secondary objectives were to estimate the difference between dexamethasone-exposed and dexamethasone-unexposed groups in 1-year event-free survival (EFS), time to neutrophil engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and invasive fungal disease (IFD) at day + 100. This was a seven-site, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients < 18 years old undergoing their first allogeneic or autologous myeloablative HCT for hematologic malignancy or aplastic anemia between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2017, were included. To control for potential confounders, propensity score weighting was used to calculate the standardized mean difference for all endpoints. Among 242 patients, 140 received dexamethasone during HCT conditioning and 102 did not. TRM was unaffected by dexamethasone exposure (1.7%; 95% CI - 7.4, 10.2%). Between-group differences in secondary outcomes were small. However, dexamethasone exposure significantly increased possible, probable, and proven IFD incidence (9.0%, 95% CI 0.8, 17.3%). TRM is not increased in pediatric patients who receive dexamethasone during HCT conditioning. Clinicians should consider potential IFD risk when selecting chemotherapy-induced vomiting prophylaxis for pediatric HCT patients.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare disorder of immune dysregulation characterized by fever, cytopenias, and splenomegaly. Its primary form poses a therapeutic challenge due to its high fatality when left untreated. We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent related-donor allogeneic stem cell transplant for primary HLH from 2010 to 2021. Among them were 10 cases of familial HLH, 8 cases of Griscelli syndrome type 2, and 1 case each with PRF1 and STX11 mutations. All the patients underwent transplants with reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning and 26 of them achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of day + 14. The donors were either fully matched (68%) or haploidentical (32%). With a median follow-up of 1 year, overall survival was 68% (n = 19) and disease-free survival was 64.4% (n = 18). OS was better in patients transplanted with a sibling donor (compared to parent donor), who achieved complete donor chimerism, and those transplanted early in the course of the disease (diagnosis to transplant duration less than 6 months).

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a widely used treatment for malignant hematological diseases; however, some patients inevitably experience relapse. Therefore, for patients who relapse after the first HSCT (HSCT1), a standard treatment regimen must be developed. A second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT2) is a possible treatment option. Several studies have analyzed the feasibility of HSCT2. Previous studies have shown that various factors may affect the efficacy of HSCT2, including the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index, duration of remission after HSCT1, occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease, and disease status before HSCT2. However, the selection of donors for HSCT2 does not affect the transplantation efficacy. HSCT2 also presents a risk of relapse, and the prognosis of patients after relapse is poor. Further research on the treatment of patients after relapse is warranted.