Transplantation Conditioning

移植调理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类白细胞抗原(HLA)-单倍体异基因造血干细胞移植(haplo-HCT)的年度数量正在稳步增长。已在急性髓性白血病和B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴瘤(ALL)中尝试了关于HLA匹配的同胞供体(MSD-HCT)的haplo-HCT与HCT的比较研究。成人T细胞ALL(T-ALL)的研究很少。在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了88例T-ALL患者,这些患者在2010年至2022年期间接受了MSD-HCT(n=24)和haplo-HCT(n=64),同时预防了基于抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD).幸存者的中位随访时间相似(MSD-HCT为43.5[范围:7-88]个月,而Haplo-HCT组为43.5(范围:6-144)个月)。II至IV级急性GVHD(aGVHD)的100天累积发病率相似,33%(95%置信区间[CI],MSD-HCT后的16%-52%)与haplo-HCT后的44%(95%CI,31%-55%),P=0.52。在MSD-HCT组中,III-IV级aGVHD的累积发生率为8%(95%CI,1%-23%),在haplo-HCT组中为5%(95%CI,1%-12%)(P=0.50)。haplo-HCT中慢性GVHD(有限且广泛)的2年累积发病率,11%(95%CI,5%-20%)明显低于MSD-HCT组(42%[95%CI,21%-62%],P=0.002)。4年复发率的累积发生率(44%对37%,P=0.56)和非复发死亡率(7%对21%,P=0.08)两组之间没有差异。4年总生存率也没有差异(46%对47%,P=0.44)和无进展生存率(49%对42%,两组之间的P=0.45)。在多变量分析中,发现使用白消安/氟达拉滨(BU/Flu)预处理方案的临床结局较差.我们的结果表明,基于ATG的haplo-HCT平台可以作为成人T-ALL患者MSD-HCT的替代方案。与MSD-HCT相比,haplo-HCT可能具有较低的cGVHD风险。
    The annual number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is increasing steadily. Comparative studies about haplo-HCT versus HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HCT) have been tried in acute myeloid leukemia and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Few studies were reported in adult T-cell ALL (T-ALL). In this retrospective study, a total of 88 consecutive patients with T-ALL were enrolled who underwent MSD-HCT (n = 24) and haplo-HCT (n = 64) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between 2010 and 2022. Median follow-up for survivors was similar (43.5 [range: 7-88] months for MSD-HCT versus 43.5 (range: 6-144) months in the Haplo-HCT group). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was similar, 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-52%) after MSD-HCT versus 44% (95% CI, 31%-55%) after haplo-HCT, P = 0.52. The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV aGVHD were 8% (95% CI, 1%-23%) in the MSD-HCT group and 5% (95% CI, 1%-12%) in the haplo-HCT group (P = 0.50). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (limited and extensive) in the haplo-HCT, 11% (95% CI, 5%-20%) was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HCT group (42% [95% CI, 21%-62%], P = 0.002). The cumulative incidence of 4-year relapse rates (44% versus 37%, P = 0.56) and non-relapse mortality (7% versus 21%, P = 0.08) did not differ between these two groups. There were also no differences in 4-year overall survival (46% versus 47%, P = 0.44) and progression-free survival (49% versus 42%, P = 0.45) between these two groups. On multivariate analysis, using busulfan/fludarabine (BU/Flu) conditioning regimen was found to be associated with worse clinical outcome. Our results suggested that ATG-based haplo-HCT platform could work as an alternative to MSD-HCT for adult patients with T-ALL. Compared with MSD-HCT, haplo-HCT might carry a low risk for cGVHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血细胞移植(Allo-HCT)后,患者通常被安置在隔离的病房,以防止中性粒细胞减少感染。自1998年以来,我们提供了一种替代方案:为距离医院1到2小时车程的患者提供家庭护理。在瑞典,这种方法包括由经验丰富的护士进行日常访问,并与单位医生进行日常电话咨询。必要时,患者接受输血,静脉注射抗生素,和在家里的全胃肠外营养。我们的初步研究报告比较了36名家庭护理患者与54名接受医院治疗的对照。多因素分析发现,家庭护理患者出院时间较早,需要更少的总肠外营养天数,急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)II-IV级较少,和较低的移植相关死亡率(TRM)和较低的成本。长期随访显示两组慢性GVHD和复发率相似,提高了家庭护理组的生存率。随后对146名家庭护理患者与接受医院治疗的对照进行的比较表明,家庭护理和更长的家庭住院时间与较低的急性GVHD等级相关。发现家庭护理对儿童和青少年是安全和有益的。二十多年来,252名患者在Allo-HCT后接受了家庭护理,在家中没有任何死亡。十年结果显示,TRM为14%,生存率为59%。2020年,一个独立的中心证实,在家庭护理中接受治疗的患者发生II-IV级急性GVHD的风险降低。这里,我们首次报道家庭护理患者也表现出较少的炎性全身性细胞因子谱.我们发现更高水平的IFN-γ,IL-2,IL-5,IL-13,GM-CSF,和G-CSF,但在接受医院治疗的患者中VEGF较低,这可能有助于急性GVHDII-IV级。总之,Allo-HCT后的家庭治疗可产生多种有希望的临床结果,并改善全身炎症标志物,这可能有助于减少危及生命的GVHD的发展。
    After allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) and conditioning, patients are typically placed in isolated hospital rooms to prevent neutropenic infections. Since 1998, we\'ve offered an alternative: home care for patients living within a one to two-hour drive of the hospital. In Sweden this approach includes daily visits by an experienced nurse and daily phone consultations with a unit physician. When necessary, patients receive transfusions, intravenous antibiotics, and total parenteral nutrition at home. Our initial study report compared 36 home care patients with 54 hospital-treated controls. Multivariate analysis found that home care patients were discharged earlier to outpatient clinics, required fewer days of total parenteral nutrition, had less acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV, and lower transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and lower costs. Long-term follow-up showed similar chronic GVHD and relapse rates in both groups, with improved survival rates in the home care group. A subsequent comparison of 146 home care patients with hospital-treated controls indicated that home care and longer home stays were associated with lower grades of acute GVHD. Home care was found to be safe and beneficial for children and adolescents. Over two decades, 252 patients received home care post-Allo-HCT without any fatalities at-home. Ten-year outcomes showed a 14% TRM and a 59% survival rate. In 2020, an independent center confirmed the reduced risk of acute GVHD grades II-IV for patients treated in home care. Here, we report for the first time that home care patients also demonstrate a less inflammatory systemic cytokine profile. We found higher levels of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-5, IL-13, GM-CSF, and G-CSF, but lower VEGF in hospital-treated patients, which may contribute to acute GVHD grades II-IV. In conclusion, home-based treatment following Allo-HCT yields multiple promising clinical outcomes and improved systemic inflammatory markers, which may contribute to less development of life-threatening GVHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们报告了一项随机试验的长期结果(GITMO,AML-R2),比较1:1白消安和环磷酰胺的组合(BuCy2,n=125)和白消安和氟达拉滨的组合(BuFlu,n=127)作为急性髓系白血病患者的预处理方案(中位年龄51岁,范围40-65)接受异基因造血干细胞移植。中位随访时间为6年,在BuFlu接受者中证实了显著更好的非复发死亡率(NRM),移植后可持续4年(10%vs.20%,p=0.0388)。这一差异在51岁以上的患者中更高(BuFlu患者中11%与27%的BuCy2,p=0.0262)。复发的累积发生率,这是整个研究人群的第一个死亡原因,在两个随机分组之间没有差异。同样,无白血病生存期(LFS)和总生存期(OS)在两个队列中没有差异,即使按中位年龄对患者进行分层。BuFlu组的无移植物和无复发生存率(GRFS)与BuCy2臂为25%vs.4年20%和20%vs.10年的17%。因此,减少NRM所获得的益处并没有被复发的增加所抵消。白血病复发仍然是一个主要问题,敦促开发新的治疗方法。
    We report the long-term results of a randomized trial (GITMO, AML-R2), comparing 1:1 the combination of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy2, n = 125) and the combination of busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu, n = 127) as conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia patients (median age 51 years, range 40-65) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up of 6 years, significantly better non-relapse mortality (NRM) was confirmed in BuFlu recipients, which is sustained up to 4 years after transplant (10% vs. 20%, p = 0.0388). This difference was higher in patients older than 51 years (11% in BuFlu vs. 27% in BuCy2, p = 0.0262). The cumulative incidence of relapse, which was the first cause of death in the entire study population, did not differ between the two randomized arms. Similarly, the leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were not different in the two cohorts, even when stratifying patients per median age. Graft-and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in BuFlu arm vs. the BuCy2 arm was 25% vs. 20% at 4 years and 20% vs. 17% at 10 years. Hence, the benefit gained by NRM reduction is not offsets by an increased relapse. Leukemia relapse remains a major concern, urging the development of new therapeutic approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫缺陷-着丝粒不稳定-面部畸形(ICF)综合征是一种先天性免疫错误,其特征是进行性免疫功能障碍和多器官疾病,通常采用抗菌药物预防和免疫球蛋白替代治疗。异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是唯一的治愈性治疗方法,但是关于结果的数据很少。我们提供了ICF综合征患者国际队列中疾病特征和HSCT结果的详细描述。18名患者(包括所有四种基因型)被纳入。HSCT的主要指征是感染(83%),肠病/未能茁壮成长(56%),免疫失调(22%)和骨髓增生异常/血液系统恶性肿瘤(17%)。两名患者在早期诊断后接受了先发制人的HSCT。患者在2003年至2021年之间进行了移植,中位年龄为4.3岁(范围为0.5-19岁),清髓性或低强度调理后,来自匹配的兄弟姐妹或匹配的家庭捐赠者,39%的匹配无关或不匹配的捐赠者,分别为50%和12%的病例。总生存率为83%(所有死亡均发生在HSCT后的前5个月内;平均随访54个月(范围1-185))。35%的患者发生急性GvHD,严重(三级)两个(12%),而没有人发展为慢性GvHD。在最近的随访中(中位数2.2年(范围0.1-14)),15/17存活患者实现了完全供体嵌合.所有存活者均表现出标准化的T和B细胞数量。除两名患者外,所有患者均实现了免疫球蛋白替代独立性。所有幸存者都从移植前感染中恢复过来,肠病/未能茁壮成长和免疫失调。所有三名患者均在年轻时(≤3岁)进行移植,早期诊断后,幸存下来。该患者队列中有利的临床和免疫学HSCT结果支持在ICF综合征中及时使用这种治愈性治疗。
    Immunodeficiency-Centromeric instability-Facial dysmorphism (ICF) syndrome is an inborn error of immunity characterized by progressive immune dysfunction and multi-organ disease usually treated with antimicrobial prophylaxis and immunoglobulin substitution. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment, but data on outcome are scarce. We provide a detailed description of disease characteristics and HSCT outcome in an international cohort of ICF syndrome patients. Eighteen patients (including all four genotypes) were enrolled. Main HSCT indications were infections (83%), enteropathy/failure to thrive (56%), immune dysregulation (22%) and myelodysplasia/haematological malignancy (17%). Two patients underwent pre-emptive HSCT after early diagnosis. Patients were transplanted between 2003-2021, at median age 4.3 years (range 0.5-19), after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning, from matched sibling or matched family donors, matched unrelated or mismatched donors in 39%, 50% and 12% of cases respectively. Overall survival was 83% (all deaths occurred within the first 5 months post-HSCT; mean follow-up 54 months (range 1-185)). Acute GvHD occurred in 35% of patients, severe (grade III) in two (12%), while none developed chronic GvHD. At latest follow-up (median 2.2 years (range 0.1-14)), complete donor chimerism was achieved in 15/17 surviving patients. All survivors demonstrated normalized T and B cell numbers. Immunoglobulin substitution independence was achieved in all but two patients. All survivors recovered from pre-transplant infections, enteropathy/failure to thrive and immune dysregulation. All three patients transplanted at young age (≤ 3 years), after early diagnosis, survived. The favourable clinical and immunological HSCT outcome in this cohort of patients supports the timely use of this curative treatment in ICF syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是观察不同调理方案对急性髓系白血病(AML)患者微移植(MST)后良好免疫指标的影响。本文讨论了微移植可能的免疫机制,并描述了一种更优化的预处理方案。纳入2015年8月至2023年10月在兰州大学第二医院接受MST治疗的55例AML患者。13例未接受MST但直接接受维持治疗的AML患者作为对照组(C)。将MST患者分为使用维奈托克的预处理方案组(A)和不使用维奈托克的预处理方案组(B)。通过流式细胞术和细胞计数珠阵列分析检测精细免疫指标。观察治疗前后免疫指标的变化,分析MST组患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。与B组相比,A组患者的PFS和OS较好.Treg细胞比例升高,IL-2表达水平升高,MST后TNF-α和IFN-α降低(P<0.05)。B组,总T细胞,MST期间CD4+T细胞和CD4+/CD8+T细胞减少;NK细胞和总B细胞增加;IL-17A先升高后降低(P<0.05)。总B细胞有显著差异,MST期间A组和B组之间的IL-4和IFN-γ。此外,总T细胞有显著差异,CD4+T细胞,Treg细胞,IL-17A,MST组患者IFN-γ和IL-2与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。含venetoclax的MST预处理方案显著改变了良好的免疫指标,并显示出改善的疗效。值得进一步研究和临床应用。
    The aim of this study was to observe the effects of different conditioning regimens on fine immune indices after microtransplantation (MST) in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This article discusses the possible immune mechanism of microtransplantation and describes a more optimized conditioning regimen. A total of 55 AML patients who received MST treatment at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from August 2015 to October 2023 were included in this study, and 13 AML patients who did not receive MST but directly received the maintenance therapy were included as the control group (C). The MST patients were divided into a conditioning regimen with venetoclax group (A) and a conditioning regimen without venetoclax group (B). The fine immune indices were detected by flow cytometry and cytometric bead array analysis. Changes in the immune indices before and after treatment were observed, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the MST group were analysed. Compared with those in Group B, patients in Group A had better PFS and OS. The proportion of Treg cells and the expression level of IL-2 were increased, while TNF-α and IFN-α were decreased after MST (P < 0.05). In Group B, total T cells, CD4+T cells and CD4+/CD8+T cells decreased; NK cells and total B cells increased; and IL-17A first increased and then decreased during the MST (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in total B cells, IL-4 and IFN-γ between Group A and Group B during MST. Moreover, there were significant differences in total T cells, CD4+T cells, Treg cells, IL-17A, IFN-γ and IL-2 between the patients in the MST group and those in the control group (P < 0.05). The MST conditioning regimen containing venetoclax significantly changed the fine immune indices and showed improved efficacy, which is worthy of further study and clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自体干细胞移植(ASCT)是淋巴瘤患者的关键治疗方法。BeEAM方案(苯达莫司汀,依托泊苷,阿糖胞苷,美法伦)传统上依赖于冷冻保存,而CEM方案(卡铂,依托泊苷,美法仑)已针对短期给药进行了优化,而无需冷冻保存。这项研究严格比较了BeEAM和CEM方案的临床和安全性。
    方法:A控制,在开罗的国际医学中心(IMC)对58名接受ASCT的淋巴瘤患者进行了随机临床试验,埃及。患者被随机分配到BeEAM(n=29)或CEM(n=29)方案,随访18个月。仔细比较了临床和安全性结果,专注于中性粒细胞和血小板的植入时间,副作用,住院时间,移植相关死亡率(TRM),和存活率。
    结果:研究结果表明CEM方案具有显著优势。CEM组中性粒细胞恢复明显更快,与BeEAM组的14.5天相比,平均8.5天(p<0.0001)。血小板恢复同样加快,CEM组11天对BeEAM组23天(p<0.0001)。CEM患者的住院时间大大缩短,与服用BeEAM的30天相比,平均18.5天(p<0.0001)。此外,CEM组的总生存率(OS)为96.55%(95%CI:84.91~99.44%),高于BeEAM组的79.31%(95%CI:63.11~89.75%)(p=0.049).CEM组的无进展生存期(PFS)也明显优于CEM组,在86.21%(95%CI:86.14-86.28%)和62.07%(95%CI:61.94-62.20%)的BeEAM组(p=0.036)。
    结论:CEM方案可能显示优于BeEAM方案,中性粒细胞和血小板恢复更快,缩短住院时间,并显著提高总体生存率和无进展生存率。未来的研究需要更长的持续时间和更大的样本量。
    背景:本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT05813132(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05813132)。(首次提交注册日期:2023年3月16日)。
    BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a pivotal treatment for lymphoma patients. The BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) traditionally relies on cryopreservation, whereas the CEM regimen (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) has been optimized for short-duration administration without the need for cryopreservation. This study rigorously compares the clinical and safety profiles of the BeEAM and CEM regimens.
    METHODS: A controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 58 lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT at the International Medical Center (IMC) in Cairo, Egypt. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BeEAM (n = 29) or CEM (n = 29) regimen, with an 18-month follow-up period. Clinical and safety outcomes were meticulously compared, focusing on time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets, side effects, length of hospitalization, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and survival rates.
    RESULTS: The findings demonstrate a significant advantage for the CEM regimen. Neutrophil recovery was markedly faster in the CEM group, averaging 8.5 days compared to 14.5 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Platelet recovery was similarly expedited, with 11 days in the CEM group versus 23 days in the BeEAM group (p < 0.0001). Hospitalization duration was substantially shorter for CEM patients, averaging 18.5 days compared to 30 days for those on BeEAM (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the CEM group at 96.55% (95% CI: 84.91-99.44%) compared to 79.31% (95% CI: 63.11-89.75%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.049). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably superior in the CEM group, at 86.21% (95% CI: 86.14-86.28%) versus 62.07% (95% CI: 61.94-62.20%) in the BeEAM group (p = 0.036).
    CONCLUSIONS: The CEM regimen might demonstrate superiority over the BeEAM regimen, with faster neutrophil and platelet recovery, reduced hospitalization time, and significantly improved overall and progression-free survival rates. Future studies with longer duration and larger sample sizes are warranted.
    BACKGROUND: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT05813132 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05813132 ). (The first submitted registration date: is March 16, 2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于概括人类生物系统的人性化小鼠模型仍然存在局限性,例如致命的移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)的发作,可变的成功率,以及全身照射(TBI)的低可及性。最近,已经研究了用CD47-SIRPA轴修饰的小鼠以改善人源化小鼠模型。然而,这种试验很少应用于NOD小鼠。在这项研究中,我们创造了一种新的老鼠品系,NOD-CD47nullRag2nullIL-2Rγnull(RTKO)小鼠,并将其应用于产生人源化小鼠。
    用TBI或白消安(BSF)注射预处理的四周龄雌性NOD-Rag2nullIL-2Rγnull(RID)和RTKO小鼠用于产生人CD34造血干细胞(HSC)移植的人源化小鼠。每周观察两次临床体征,每周测量一次体重。以4周或2周的间隔进行人白细胞抗原的流式细胞术。在HSC注射后48周处死小鼠。
    移植后16至40周,hCD45的百分比在所有组中大多保持在25%以上,在RTKOBSF组中持续时间最长,最高。人白细胞的重建,包括hCD3在内,在RTKOBSF组中也最为突出。在所有组中,只有两只小鼠在移植后40周前死亡,除了死亡的小鼠,没有危及生命的GvHD病变。GvHD的发生已被鉴定为主要归因于人T细胞浸润组织及其相关细胞因子。
    在本研究中应用的所有条件下的人源化小鼠模型被认为是基于人类白细胞重建的改善和稳定的动物健康的长期实验的合适模型。尤其是,用BSF预处理的RTKO小鼠有望成为不仅用于产生人源化小鼠而且用于各种免疫研究领域的有价值的平台。
    UNASSIGNED: Humanized mouse models to recapitulate human biological systems still have limitations, such as the onset of lethal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a variable success rate, and the low accessibility of total body irradiation (TBI). Recently, mice modified with the CD47-SIRPA axis have been studied to improve humanized mouse models. However, such trials have been rarely applied in NOD mice. In this study, we created a novel mouse strain, NOD-CD47nullRag2nullIL-2rγnull (RTKO) mice, and applied it to generate humanized mice.
    UNASSIGNED: Four-week-old female NOD-Rag2nullIL-2rγnull (RID) and RTKO mice pre-conditioned with TBI or busulfan (BSF) injection were used for generating human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engrafted humanized mice. Clinical signs were observed twice a week, and body weight was measured once a week. Flow cytometry for human leukocyte antigens was performed at intervals of four weeks or two weeks, and mice were sacrificed at 48 weeks after HSC injection.
    UNASSIGNED: For a long period from 16 to 40 weeks post transplantation, the percentage of hCD45 was mostly maintained above 25% in all groups, and it was sustained the longest and highest in the RTKO BSF group. Reconstruction of human leukocytes, including hCD3, was also most prominent in the RTKO BSF group. Only two mice died before 40 weeks post transplantation in all groups, and there were no life-threatening GvHD lesions except in the dead mice. The occurrence of GvHD has been identified as mainly due to human T cells infiltrating tissues and their related cytokines.
    UNASSIGNED: Humanized mouse models under all conditions applied in this study are considered suitable models for long-term experiments based on the improvement of human leukocytes reconstruction and the stable animal health. Especially, RTKO mice pretreated with BSF are expected to be a valuable platform not only for generating humanized mice but also for various immune research fields.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有许多针对多发性骨髓瘤的新疗法,它仍然是一种无法治愈的疾病,几乎所有患者都注定要复发。在现代代理人时代,二次自体干细胞移植在一线自体移植后复发的患者中仍有其作用.作者回顾了复发性多发性骨髓瘤的第二次自动SCT单中心经验。30名患者在该机构接受了自动SCT抢救。诊断后的中位随访时间为86个月,移植之间的中位时间为59.1个月。第二次ASCT前的反应如下:CR-11例,VGPR-9例,PR-10例。大多数患者接受减少剂量(140mg/m2)的美法仑作为第二次自动SCT的预处理方案。治疗相关死亡率为3%。第二次移植后的中位随访时间为34个月,中位无进展生存期为24个月.第二次移植后第100天达到CR或VGPR的患者的中位PFS为32个月。15个月前,所有患者仅部分缓解进展,平均PFS为8.5个月。在后续期间,未开发MDS或AML,第二恶性肿瘤的发生率也很低,3%。总之,第二次自体干细胞移植是治疗部分患者复发多发性骨髓瘤的一种耐受性良好且有效的治疗选择,虽然PFS比第一次缓解时更短。
    Despite the availability of many novel therapies for multiple myeloma, it remains an incurable disease with relapse fated in almost all patients. In the era of modern agents, second autologous stem cell transplantation still holds its role in patients relapsing after first-line autologous transplant. The authors reviewed a single-center experience with a second auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Thirty patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at the institution. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 86 months, and the median time between transplants was 59.1 months. Response before second ASCT was the following: CR - 11 cases, VGPR - 9 cases, PR - 10 cases. Most patients received reduced dose (140 mg/m2) of melphalan as a conditioning regimen for the second auto-SCT. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up time of 34 months after the second transplant, median progression-free survival was 24 months. The median PFS in the patients achieving CR or VGPR at day 100 after the second transplantation was 32 months. By 15 months, all patients achieved only partial remission progressed, with a median PFS of 8.5 months. During the follow-up period, no MDS or AML developed, and the frequency of second malignancy was also low, 3%. In conclusion, second autologous stem cell transplantation is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma in selected patients, though with a shorter PFS than in first remission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏功能障碍是癌症治疗的严重不良反应,可干扰癌症患者的生活质量并影响长期生存。造血细胞移植是许多晚期血液系统恶性肿瘤和骨髓衰竭综合征的潜在治愈疗法,然而,与一些短期和长期的不良反应有关,包括重要的,心血管毒性。这篇综述文章的目的是描述以前可能发生的心血管事件,during,造血细胞移植后,回顾短期和长期心血管毒性的危险因素,讨论心血管危险分层和评估的方法,并强调了造血细胞移植患者在考虑心血管疾病方面的研究空白。对心血管事件和与心血管疾病相关的因素的进一步了解将有望导致新的干预措施,以管理和减轻移植幸存者晚期心血管影响的重大长期负担。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of cancer therapies that can interfere with quality of life and impact long-term survival in patients with cancer. Hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for many advanced hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes, however is associated with several short- and long-term adverse effects, including importantly, cardiovascular toxicities. The goal of this review article is to describe the cardiovascular events that may develop before, during, and after hematopoietic cell transplantation, review risk factors for short- and long-term cardiovascular toxicities, discuss approaches to cardiovascular risk stratification and evaluation, and highlight the research gaps in the consideration of cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Further understanding of cardiovascular events and the factors associated with cardiovascular disease will hopefully lead to novel interventions in managing and mitigating the significant long-term burden of late cardiovascular effects in transplant survivors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是一种广泛应用于恶性血液病的治疗方法,一些患者不可避免地会复发。因此,对于首次HSCT(HSCT1)后复发的患者,必须制定标准的治疗方案。第二次造血干细胞移植(HSCT2)是可能的治疗选择。一些研究分析了HSCT2的可行性。以往的研究表明,多种因素可能会影响HSCT2的疗效,包括造血细胞移植合并症指数,HSCT1后缓解的持续时间,慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生,和HSCT2之前的疾病状态。然而,HSCT2供体的选择不影响移植疗效。HSCT2也存在复发的风险,复发后患者预后较差。有必要对复发后患者的治疗进行进一步研究。
    Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a widely used treatment for malignant hematological diseases; however, some patients inevitably experience relapse. Therefore, for patients who relapse after the first HSCT (HSCT1), a standard treatment regimen must be developed. A second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT2) is a possible treatment option. Several studies have analyzed the feasibility of HSCT2. Previous studies have shown that various factors may affect the efficacy of HSCT2, including the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index, duration of remission after HSCT1, occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease, and disease status before HSCT2. However, the selection of donors for HSCT2 does not affect the transplantation efficacy. HSCT2 also presents a risk of relapse, and the prognosis of patients after relapse is poor. Further research on the treatment of patients after relapse is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号