Surrogate

代理人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:预先指令(AD)基于结构不同的州特定法规,术语,和选项。这种可变性导致在一种状态下执行AD但在另一种状态下生病的患者的不一致的生命终止(EOL)护理。这项研究回顾了2002年的一篇文章,该文章确定了广告中的相当大的差异,以确定广告是否变得更加统一。
    方法:对来自所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的AD进行了检查,以确定文件类型的频率和七个关键问题。结果与2002年使用非参数方法的研究进行了比较。使用t检验和单因素方差分析比较关键问题的平均数。
    结果:与2002年一致,2023年的三个州提供了医疗保健授权书(HCPOA)的法规。然而,各州提供联合的HCPOA,和生活意志(LW),被视为医疗保健预先指令(ADHC),从13增加到30。在这两项研究之间,LW和ADHC的长期护理显着增加,而LW的人工支持显着增加。尽管阿尔茨海默氏症在美国的患病率上升,2023年,只有10%的州纳入了这一问题。
    结论:尽管医疗保健趋势不断发展,自2002年以来,对广告的修订最少。这种缺乏统一性会导致对EOL愿望的正确理解的混乱。作者建议重新审视《统一预先指令法》,以促进广告的更大一致性,并确保不同州的个人偏好得到理解和尊重。
    OBJECTIVE: Advance directives (AD) are based on state-specific statutes that vary in structure, terminology, and options. This variability leads to inconsistent end-of-life (EOL) care for patients who have executed an AD in one state but fall ill in another state. This study revisits a 2002 article that identified considerable differences in ADs to determine whether ADs have become more uniform.
    METHODS: ADs from all 50 states and the District of Columbia were examined to determine the frequency of document types and seven key issues. The results were = compared to the 2002 study using non-parametric approaches. Mean numbers of key issues were compared using t-tests and one-way ANOVA.
    RESULTS: Consistent with 2002, three states in 2023 provide statutes for Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA). However, states offering a combined HCPOA, and living will (LW), deemed an advance directive for health care (ADHC), increased from 13 to 30. Between both studies, Long Term Care increased significantly in LW and ADHC, while Artificial Sustenance significantly increased in LW. Despite the rising prevalence of Alzheimer\'s in the United States, only 10% of states included this issue in 2023.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite evolving healthcare trends, minimal revisions have been made to ADs since 2002. This lack of uniformity can cause confusion regarding proper understanding of EOL wishes. The authors recommend that the Uniform Act for Advance Directives be revisited to promote greater uniformity in ADs and ensure that individuals\' preferences are understood and respected across different states.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生物标志物是生物医学或流行病学研究中疾病或医学状况的严重程度或存在的可测量指标。生物标志物可能有助于疾病的早期诊断和预防。已经鉴定了许多疾病的几种生物标志物,例如胰腺癌的糖抗原19-9。然而,由于许多原因,例如样本收集或生物标志物的日常受试者内变异性,生物标志物可能会被错误地测量。在其他人中。生物标志物中的测量误差导致流行病学研究中生物标志物与疾病关联的回归参数估计存在偏差。此外,生物标志物中的测量误差可能会影响标准诊断措施,以评估生物标志物的性能,例如受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,ROC曲线下的面积,灵敏度,和特异性。测量误差还可能对如何将多种癌症生物标志物组合为疾病诊断的复合预测因子产生影响。在后续研究中,生物标志物通常在检查时间间歇地收集,这可能是稀疏的,通常在事件时间没有观察到生物标志物。纵向和时间到事件数据的联合建模是在重复测量的生物标志物和时间到事件结果的分析中考虑测量误差的有效方法。在这篇文章中,我们对回归分析中校正估计的现有方法进行了文献综述,诊断措施,以及当生物标志物被错误地测量时,纵向生物标志物和生存结果的联合建模。本文分为:数据分析的统计和图形方法>稳健方法数据分析的统计和图形方法>EM算法统计模型>生存模型。
    A biomarker is a measurable indicator of the severity or presence of a disease or medical condition in biomedical or epidemiological research. Biomarkers may help in early diagnosis and prevention of diseases. Several biomarkers have been identified for many diseases such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for pancreatic cancer. However, biomarkers may be measured with errors due to many reasons such as specimen collection or day-to-day within-subject variability of the biomarker, among others. Measurement error in the biomarker leads to bias in the regression parameter estimation for the association of the biomarker with disease in epidemiological studies. In addition, measurement error in the biomarkers may affect standard diagnostic measures to evaluate the performance of biomarkers such as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Measurement error may also have an effect on how to combine multiple cancer biomarkers as a composite predictor for disease diagnosis. In follow-up studies, biomarkers are often collected intermittently at examination times, which may be sparse and typically biomarkers are not observed at the event times. Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data is a valid approach to account for measurement error in the analysis of repeatedly measured biomarkers and time-to-event outcomes. In this article, we provide a literature review on existing methods to correct for estimation in regression analysis, diagnostic measures, and joint modeling of longitudinal biomarkers and survival outcomes when the biomarkers are measured with errors. This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Robust MethodsStatistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > EM AlgorithmStatistical Models > Survival Models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于社区的姑息治疗(CBPC)临床医生在第一次遇到患者时,有时会遇到道德上收费的情况:患者的配偶,或其他亲人或照顾者,撤销患者的有效知情同意书以启动护理。虽然代理人通常是出于保护本能,在其他情况下,代理人出于自身利益行事。本文考虑了成年人撤销另一名成年人的有效知情同意以启动姑息治疗服务是否在道德上合理。本文从三个角度考察了这种情况:患者给予或放弃知情同意的能力,代理人对替代判断或最佳利益的意图和使用,以及临床医生提供临床护理的责任。这种伦理分析认为,即使代孕者充当干扰或反对力量,CBPC临床医生也有道德责任为已获得有效知情同意的患者提供姑息治疗服务。
    Community-based palliative care (CBPC) clinicians sometimes contend with an ethically charged scenario when they encounter patients for the first time: The patient\'s spouse, or other loved one or caregiver, revokes the patient\'s valid informed consent to initiate care. While surrogates are usually motivated by protective instincts, there are other situations where surrogates act out of self-interest. This article considers whether it is ever ethically justified for an adult to revoke another adult\'s valid informed consent to initiate palliative care services. The article examines this scenario from three perspectives: the patient\'s capacity to give or relinquish informed consent, the surrogate\'s intent and use of substituted judgment or best interest, and the clinician\'s duty to provide clinical care. This ethical analysis argues that CBPC clinicians have an ethical responsibility to provide palliative care services for patients who have given valid informed consent for those services even when a surrogate acts as an interfering or oppositional force.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    除了人类的骨头,环氧基合成骨被认为是骨合成生物力学测试的金标准。在生物力学测试中,由于实验方法中的植入物治疗而确定的骨折稳定性与其预测患者稳定性和骨折愈合结果的能力之间存在显着差异。这种差异的一个可能的解释是缺乏特定于人口的变量,如年龄,性别,和人造骨的种族,这可能会影响骨骼的几何形状和机械性能。这篇综述的目的是确定市售人造骨是否足以代表股骨骨合成的机械测试的人体解剖学变异性。总结一下,目前,合适的骨替代物的可用性限制了种植体-骨结构的机械评估的有效性.目前可用的合成骨都不能准确反映人体骨的局部力学性能,也不能充分代表不同人群之间的必要差异,限制了它们的普遍临床相关性。
    Aside from human bones, epoxy-based synthetic bones are regarded as the gold standard for biomechanical testing os osteosyntheses. There is a significant discrepancy in biomechanical testing between the determination of fracture stability due to implant treatment in experimental methods and their ability to predict the outcome of stability and fracture healing in a patient. One possible explanation for this disparity is the absence of population-specific variables such as age, gender, and ethnicity in artificial bone, which may influence the geometry and mechanical properties of bone. The goal of this review was to determine whether commercially available artificial bones adequately represent human anatomical variability for mechanical testing of femoral osteosyntheses. To summarize, the availability of suitable bone surrogates currently limits the validity of mechanical evaluations of implant-bone constructs. The currently available synthetic bones neither accurately reflect the local mechanical properties of human bone, nor adequately represent the necessary variability between various populations, limiting their generalized clinical relevance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在研究抗血栓药物对冠心病患者的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)中,出血事件经常被用作安全终点。然而,出血事件是否是死亡的有效替代因素仍不确定.
    本研究旨在评估出血事件的治疗效果与死亡率之间的相关性。
    搜索多个数据库以确定研究冠心病患者抗血栓药物的RCT,直至2022年8月。纳入的试验中定义了主要和次要出血事件,主要定义为BARC(出血学术研究联盟)或TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)标准。评估非致死性出血事件和死亡率之间的试验水平相关性。我们根据出血的定义(BARC与TIMI标准)进行了亚组分析,学习年,和后续持续时间。我们使用具有R2>0.72的95%置信区间的下限的截止作为强相关性,并且具有R2<0.50的95%置信区间的上限的截止作为弱相关性。
    共分析了48项RCT,其中181,951名参与者。总的来说,主要和次要出血的试验水平R2分别为0.09(95%CI:0.00-0.26)和0.09(95%CI:0.00-0.27),分别。当局限于大出血时,R2分别为0.03(95%CI:0.00-0.13)和0.01(95%CI:0.00-0.05),分别。所有亚组分析均未显示任何显着相关性。
    在研究抗血栓药物对冠状动脉疾病的作用的随机对照试验中,我们证明了试验定义的出血事件可能不是死亡的有效替代因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Bleeding events are frequently applied as safety end points for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of antithrombotic agents in patients with coronary artery disease. However, whether a bleeding event is a valid surrogate for death remain uncertain.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the correlation between the treatment effect on bleeding events and mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple databases were searched to identify RCTs studying antithrombotic agents for patients with coronary artery disease through August 2022. Major and minor bleeding events were defined in included trials, mostly defined with BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria. Trial-level correlations between nonfatal bleeding events and mortality were assessed. We performed subgroup analyses by the definitions of bleeding (BARC vs TIMI criteria), study year, and follow-up duration. We used a cutoff with a lower limit of 95% confidence interval of R2 >0.72 as a strong correlation and with an upper limit of 95% confidence interval of R2 <0.50 as a weak correlation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 48 RCTs with 181,951 participants were analyzed. Overall, trial-level R2 for major and minor bleeding were 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-0.26) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-0.27) for all-cause or cardiovascular death, respectively. When confined to major bleeding, R2 were 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00-0.13) and 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.05), respectively. All of the subgroup analyses did not show any significant correlations.
    UNASSIGNED: We demonstrated a trial-defined bleeding event may not be a valid surrogate for mortality in RCTs investigating the effect of antithrombotic agents for coronary artery disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    骨应力损伤在运动员和新兵中很普遍,并且会极大地影响训练时间表。开发踝足矫形器以减少胫骨负荷并使其更快地恢复活动将需要新的设备测试方法,该方法能够捕获肌肉力量对胫骨应变的贡献。因此,开发了一种驱动的机器人替代腿,以探索胫骨应变在不同踝足矫形器条件下的变化。这项工作的目的是评估可靠性,可扩展性,和代理人的行为。双致动系统由Bowden电缆和通过材料测试系统施加到股骨的垂直载荷组成,复制了阿基里斯-比目鱼复合体的作用反应。最大和最小主应变,最大剪切应变,和轴向应变是通过仪器应变仪在胫骨的五个位置测量的。菌株在测试中是高度可重复的,但是当缩放时并不一致地匹配体内数据。然而,踝足矫形器支柱的刚度没有系统地影响胫骨负荷,这与体内发现一致。未来的工作将涉及改善结果的可扩展性以匹配体内数据,并使用代用品为骨骼应力损伤的外骨骼设计提供信息。
    Bone stress injuries are prevalent among athletes and military recruits and can significantly compromise training schedules. The development of an ankle-foot orthosis to reduce tibial load and enable a faster return to activity will require new device testing methodologies capable of capturing the contribution of muscular force on tibial strain. Thus, an actuated robotic surrogate leg was developed to explore how tibial strain changes with different ankle-foot orthosis conditions. The purpose of this work was to assess the reliability, scalability, and behavior of the surrogate. A dual actuation system consisting of a Bowden cable and a vertical load applied to the femur via a material testing system, replicated the action-reaction of the Achilles-soleus complex. Maximum and minimum principal strain, maximum shear strain, and axial strain were measured by instrumented strain gauges at five locations on the tibia. Strains were highly repeatable across tests but did not consistently match in vivo data when scaled. However, the stiffness of the ankle-foot orthosis strut did not systematically affect tibial load, which is consistent with in vivo findings. Future work will involve improving the scalability of the results to match in vivo data and using the surrogate to inform exoskeletal designs for bone stress injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在估计暴露-疾病关联时,由于暴露测量误差,流行病学研究经常遇到挑战。替代变量可用于真实的未观察到的曝光变量。然而,在代理变量中经常遇到零膨胀数据。例如,在一组个体中,许多营养或身体活动措施可能具有零值(或低可检测值)。在本文中,当整个研究队列中的某些个体中观察到的替代项的值可能为零时,我们进行了回归分析.不考虑代理变量在0(或低可检测值)的概率质量的朴素回归校准将是有偏差的。我们开发了一种回归校准估计器,该估计器通常比朴素回归校准估计器有更小的偏差。我们提出了一个在零膨胀代理回归模型下一致的预期估计方程估计器。广泛的仿真表明,所提出的估计器在偏差校正方面表现良好。这些方法适用于身体活动干预研究。
    Epidemiological studies often encounter a challenge due to exposure measurement error when estimating an exposure-disease association. A surrogate variable may be available for the true unobserved exposure variable. However, zero-inflated data are encountered frequently in the surrogate variables. For example, many nutrient or physical activity measures may have a zero value (or a low detectable value) among a group of individuals. In this paper, we investigate regression analysis when the observed surrogates may have zero values among some individuals of the whole study cohort. A naive regression calibration without taking into account a probability mass of the surrogate variable at 0 (or a low detectable value) will be biased. We developed a regression calibration estimator which typically can have smaller biases than the naive regression calibration estimator. We propose an expected estimating equation estimator which is consistent under the zero-inflated surrogate regression model. Extensive simulations show that the proposed estimator performs well in terms of bias correction. These methods are applied to a physical activity intervention study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的对诊断为急性肾损伤的危重病人越来越多地采用肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。但最佳启动时间仍不清楚,预后不确定,导致医疗复杂性,伦理冲突,和重症监护病房(ICU)设置中的决策困境。这项研究旨在为危重病人的家庭代孕开发决策辅助(DA),以支持他们与临床医生共同参与决策过程。方法DA的开发采用了以用户为中心的设计(UCD)原则的系统过程,其中包括:(I)竞争分析:搜索,筛选,并评估现有的DA,以收集设计策略的见解,开发技术,和功能;(ii)用户需求评估:访谈家庭代理人,以探索目标用户群体的决策经验并确定他们未满足的需求;(iii)证据综合:整合最新的临床证据和相关信息,以告知DA的内容开发。结果竞争分析包括16个相关数据,我们从现有资源中获得了有价值的见解。在15名家庭代理人中探索了用户决策需求,揭示决策中的四个主题问题,包括陷入困境,不确定感,容量有限,和延迟的决定确认。共有27篇文章用于证据综合。关于疾病和治疗的相关决策知识,如来自决策支持系统或临床指南的文献所述,被格式化为基础知识库。提取了21项证据,并将其整合到RRT的收益和风险内容面板中,可能的结果,以及选择的理由。使用UCD的元素将DA起草成基于网络的照型。该平台可以指导用户通过连续的四步进度进行决策准备:确定治疗方案,权衡收益和风险,澄清个人偏好和价值观,并制定与临床医生正式共同决策的时间表。结论我们开发了DA的快速原型,为ICU中需要RRT的危重患者的家庭代理决策者量身定制。需要未来的研究来评估其可用性,可行性,以及这种干预的临床效果。
    Objectives Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is increasingly adopted for critically ill patients diagnosed with acute kidney injury, but the optimal time for initiation remains unclear and prognosis is uncertain, leading to medical complexity, ethical conflicts, and decision dilemmas in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. This study aimed to develop a decision aid (DA) for the family surrogate of critically ill patients to support their engagement in shared decision-making process with clinicians. Methods Development of DA employed a systematic process with user-centered design (UCD) principle, which included: (i) competitive analysis: searched, screened, and assessed the existing DAs to gather insights for design strategies, developmental techniques, and functionalities; (ii) user needs assessment: interviewed family surrogates in our hospital to explore target user group\'s decision-making experience and identify their unmet needs; (iii) evidence syntheses: integrate latest clinical evidence and pertinent information to inform the content development of DA. Results The competitive analysis included 16 relevant DAs, from which we derived valuable insights using existing resources. User decision needs were explored among a cohort of 15 family surrogates, revealing four thematic issues in decision-making, including stuck into dilemmas, sense of uncertainty, limited capacity, and delayed decision confirmation. A total of 27 articles were included for evidence syntheses. Relevant decision-making knowledge on disease and treatment, as delineated in the literature sourced from decision support system or clinical guidelines, were formatted as the foundational knowledge base. Twenty-one items of evidence were extracted and integrated into the content panels of benefits and risks of RRT, possible outcomes, and reasons to choose. The DA was drafted into a web-based phototype using the elements of UCD. This platform could guide users in their preparation of decision-making through a sequential four-step process: identifying treatment options, weighing the benefits and risks, clarifying personal preferences and values, and formulating a schedule for formal shared decision-making with clinicians. Conclusions We developed a rapid prototype of DA tailored for family surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients in need of RRT in ICU setting. Future studies are needed to evaluate its usability, feasibility, and clinical effects of this intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    犬瘟热病毒(CDV)是麻疹病毒属中的一种高度传染性病原体,感染各种不同的食肉动物物种。该病毒与其他密切相关的麻疹病毒具有大多数生物学特征,包括临床症状,组织嗜性,和在各自的宿主生物体中的复制循环。在实验室环境中,用CDV建立了雪貂的实验感染作为有效的替代模型,用于分析人类麻疹病毒生物学的几个方面,麻疹病毒(MeV)。这些动物天然地易受CDV的影响,并显示出严重的临床症状,类似于在感染MeV的患者中看到的疾病。如MeV所示,CDV感染免疫细胞,因此与强烈的短暂免疫抑制有关。在这里,我们描述了几种方法来评估从CDV感染的动物分离的血液循环免疫细胞中的病毒载量和免疫抑制参数。
    Canine distemper virus (CDV) is a highly contagious pathogen within the morbillivirus genus infecting a wide range of different carnivore species. The virus shares most biological features with other closely related morbilliviruses, including clinical signs, tissue tropism, and replication cycle in the respective host organisms.In the laboratory environment, experimental infections of ferrets with CDV were established as a potent surrogate model for the analysis of several aspects of the biology of the human morbillivirus, measles virus (MeV). The animals are naturally susceptible to CDV and display severe clinical signs resembling the disease seen in patients infected with MeV. As seen with MeV, CDV infects immune cells and is thus associated with a strong transient immunosuppression. Here we describe several methods to evaluate viral load and parameters of immunosuppression in blood-circulating immune cells isolated from CDV-infected animals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号