In regenerative medicine, the isolation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from the adipose tissue\'s stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a critical area of study. Our review meticulously examines the isolation process of MSCs, starting with the extraction of adipose tissue. The choice of liposuction technique, anatomical site, and immediate processing are essential to maintain cell functionality. We delve into the intricacies of enzymatic digestion, emphasizing the fine-tuning of enzyme concentrations to maximize cell yield while preventing harm. The review then outlines the filtration and centrifugation techniques necessary for isolating a purified SVF, alongside cell viability assessments like flow cytometry, which are vital for confirming the efficacy of the isolated MSCs. We discuss the advantages and drawbacks of using autologous vs allogeneic SVF sources, touching upon immunocompatibility and logistical considerations, as well as the variability inherent in donor-derived cells. Anesthesia choices, the selection between hypodermic needles vs liposuction cannulas, and the role of adipose tissue lysers in achieving cellular dissociation are evaluated for their impact on SVF isolation. Centrifugation protocols are also analyzed for their part in ensuring the integrity of the SVF. The necessity for standardized MSC isolation protocols is highlighted, promoting reproducibility and successful clinical application. We encourage ongoing research to deepen the understanding of MSC biology and therapeutic action, aiming to further the field of regenerative medicine. The review concludes with a call for rigorous research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and strict adherence to ethical and regulatory standards to safeguard patient safety and optimize treatment outcomes with MSCs.

Wound development and healing involve intricate genetic and molecular processes, posing significant clinical management challenges. The objective of this study was to assess commonly used fat extracts\' efficacy and safety (autologous fat, stromal vascular fraction and adipose-derived stem cells) in wound healing, particularly for refractory wounds, with the goal of providing evidence in clinical use. After a systematic review, 21 randomised controlled trials were included in our study. Based on the classification of human fat products, our meta-analysis revealed that the use of human fat products could speed healing rate, shorten healing time and achieve more complete healing, with statistically significant differences in outcome indicators when compared to conventional treatments. The analysis of histological findings across various studies indicated that fat extracts can promote epithelialization, collagen deposition and vascularization, thereby facilitating tissue regeneration and reducing inflammatory reactions. There were potential benefits to reducing patient pain levels after using adipose extracts. Furthermore, we analysed and summarised adverse events indicating the safe and effective clinical use of human fat products in wound treatment. Our research findings supported the efficiency of human fat products and demonstrated a high degree of safety in the clinical practice of wound management.

BACKGROUND: Localized scleroderma (LoS) is an autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the skin, and is often treated with autologous fat grafting (AFG). Nevertheless, the retention rate of AFG in patients with LoS is typically low. We hypothesize that the low retention rate may be partially attributed to the inherent abnormalities of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) from nonlesional sites of patients with LoS.
METHODS: We performed a comparative analysis of the single-cell transcriptome of the SVF from nonlesional sites of patients with LoS and healthy donors, including cellular compositional analysis, differential expression analysis, and high-dimensional weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Experimental validation with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis mice models were conducted.
RESULTS: We found a significant reduction in the relative proportion of CD55high interstitial progenitors in ASCs under the condition of LoS. Differential expression analysis revealed inherent abnormalities of ASCs from patients with LoS, including enhanced fibrogenesis, reduced anti-inflammatory properties, and increased oxidative stress. Compared with CD55low ASCs, CD55high ASCs expressed significantly higher levels of secreted protein genes that had functions related to anti-inflammation and tissue regeneration (such as CD55, MFAP5, and METRNL). Meanwhile, CD55high ASCs expressed significantly lower levels of secreted protein genes that promote inflammation, such as chemokine and complement protein genes. Furthermore, we provided in vivo experimental evidence that CD55high ASCs had superior treatment efficacy compared with CD55low ASCs in bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis mice models.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that the low retention rate of AFG may be partially ascribed to the reduced pool of interstitial progenitor cells (CD55high) present within the ASC population in patients with LoS. We demonstrated the potential for improving the efficacy of AFG in the treatment of LoS by restoring the pool of interstitial progenitors within ASCs. Our study has significant implications for the field of translational regenerative medicine.

UNASSIGNED: Stromal Vascular fraction/gel (SVF/gel) is prepared mechanically from autologous adipose tissue, and it is known for its regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties.
UNASSIGNED: To assess histopathological effects of adipose tissue-derived SVF/gel and nasal steroids on nasal mucosal healing.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-two Wistar Albino rats with right nasal mucosal injury were randomly divided into three groups: control (saline), Mometasone Furoate (MF), and SVF/gel. Control group (n = 14) received saline for 7 days, while MF group (n = 14) was administered MF to the right nasal cavity for 7 days. SVF/gel group (n = 14) was treated once with SVF/gel in the right nasal cavity. Histological analysis on days 14 and 28 post-injury focused on evaluating epithelial thickness, inflammation, disarray, subepithelial thickness, goblet cell count, subepithelial fibrosis, presence of ciliated cells, lacunae, adhesion, and neo-osteogenesis.
UNASSIGNED: When comparing the MF and SVF/gel groups, statistically significant differences were found on day 14 in indices of epithelial thickness, subepithelial thickness, goblet cells, subepithelial fibrosis, and ciliated cells. On day 28, SVF/gel group exhibited higher ciliated cell counts and lower subepithelial fibrosis values (p = .027; p = .016). Additionally, epithelial disarray, adhesions, lacunae, and neo-osteogenesis were not observed in the SVF/gel group.
UNASSIGNED: SVF/gel accelerates re-epithelialization, reduces fibrosis and adhesions, and enhances cilia formation compared to nasal steroids. These findings suggest that SVF/gel is an autologous and cost-effective treatment for improving nasal mucosal healing post-injury.

Background/Objectives: This retrospective observational study sought to determine the efficacy and safety of an innovative combined treatment protocol using guided Superficial Enhanced Fluid Fat Injection (SEFFI) and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in facial rejuvenation. Methods: A total of 158 patients (149 females and 9 males) underwent the combined treatment of guided SEFFI and diluted/hyperdiluted CaHA. The study evaluated treatment outcomes at 30, 90, and 150 days post-treatment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. Results: The combined treatment demonstrated consistent enhancement in skin quality and facial volume across temporal, malar, zygomatic, and jawline regions. At 90 days post-treatment, substantial improvements were observed, with the GAIS scores reflecting significant enhancements in both skin quality and volume, which were sustained or slightly improved by 150 days. Minor complications, predominantly ecchymosis at the injection sites, resolved within a week, confirming the treatments\' safety. Conclusions: The integration of guided SEFFI and CaHA resulted in significant improvements in skin quality and facial volume with minimal complications. Further research is recommended to consolidate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in treating scars using the latest meta-analysis.
METHODS: We used PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science to search the studies used to evaluate the efficacy of SVF in scar treatment. At least one of the following outcome measures were reported: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, pain, itching and color.
RESULTS: A total of four eligible articles comprising 145 patients (64 SVF patients and 81 non-SVF patients) were included. The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that SVF had significant therapeutic effects in terms of vascularity (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -1.12, -0.02; p = 0.04), itching (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -0.61, -0.13; p = 0.002), POSAS (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -5.93, -1.47; p = 0.001), and thickness (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -1.04, -0.35; p < 0.001). In terms of OSAS (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -9.14, 0.59; p = 0.09), pigmentation (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -1.02, 0.06; p = 0.08), relief (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -1.14, 0.16; p = 0.14), surface area (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -0.91, 0.26; p = 0.27), PSAS (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -7.20, 0.49; p = 0.09), pain (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -0.87, 0.07; p = 0.10), pliability (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -0.57, 0.01; p = 0.06), and color (SMD/MD, 95% CI: -1.78, 0.48; p = 0.26), there were no significant statistical differences.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of the heterogeneity and potential selective bias, further large-scale, prospective, and multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and reliability of SVF in the treatment of scars.

There are multiple methods to prepare lipoaspirate for autologous fat transfer; however, graft retention remains unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to compare the cellular and protein composition of adipose grafts and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) resulting from three common techniques to prepare adipose grafts. Adipose grafts were harvested from healthy donors and processed via three techniques: centrifugation (C), a single-filter (SF) device, and a double-filtration (DF) system. Part of each graft was analyzed or further processed to isolate the SVF. Cell viability, surface markers, cytokine, and growth factors were compared between the graft and SVF as well as adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Overall, we found variations across the three processing techniques and among the graft components (ASCs, SVF, and fat). Cell viability within the grafts was similar (94.6%, 92.3%, and 93.6%; P = 0.93). The trend was a greater percentage of ASCs from SF versus DF or centrifugation (6.95%, 4.63%, and 1.93%, respectively, P = 0.06). Adipogenic markers (adiponectin and leptin) were similar among all three grafts (P = 0.45). Markers of tissue remodeling were greatest in the SVF compared with fat and ASCs, regardless of processing technique. There was higher relative expression of MMP-9 (2×), Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (2.5×), endoglin (5×), and IL-8 (1.5×) in the SVF (P < 0.005). Our study identified differences in cytokine expression in adipose grafts and the SVF, particularly in cytokines important in inflammation and wound healing. These secretomes may impact graft retention and fat necrosis and have the potential implications in cell-assisted lipotransfer. There were no significant differences between the final products of any of the processing techniques.

There are many potential therapeutic applications for autologous adipose-derived stromal cells. These cells are found in a heterogeneous population isolated from adipose tissue called the stromal vascular fraction (SVF). Closed automated systems are available to release cells from the adherent stroma. Here, we test one system to evaluate the heterogeneous output for yield, purity, cellular characterization, and stemness criteria. The SVF was isolated from three donors using the Automated Cell Station (ACS) from BSL Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea. The SVF cellular output was characterized for cell yield and viability, immunophenotyping analysis, pluripotent differentiation potential, adhesion to plastic, and colony-forming units. Additionally, the SVF was tested for endotoxin and collagenase residuals. The SVF yield from the ACS system was an average volume of 7.9 ± 0.5 mL containing an average of 19 × 106 nucleated cells with 85 ± 12% viability. Flow cytometry identified a variety of cells, including ASCs (23%), macrophages (24%), endothelial cells (5%), pericytes (4%), and transitional cells (0.5%). The final concentrated product contained cells capable of differentiating into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic phenotypes. Furthermore, tests for SVF sterility and purity showed no evidence of endotoxin or collagenase residuals. The ACS system can efficiently process cells from adipose tissue within the timeframe of a single surgical procedure. The cellular characterization indicated that this system can yield a sterile and concentrated SVF output, providing a valuable source of ASCs within the heterogeneous cell population.

BACKGROUND: A specialized device equipped with a sharp blade filter has been developed to enable more efficient purification of a micronized cellular adipose matrix (MCAM) containing stem cells. The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics and functions of the population of stromal cells (mSVF) and cultured cells (mASCs) purified using this device with those of cSVF and cASCs obtained through conventional enzymatic purification.
METHODS: Cell viability, proliferation capacity and yield were assessed. Characterization of stem cell potency was performed by analyzing cell surface markers including CD34, a marker of activated adipose-derived stem cells. The trilineage differentiation potential was evaluated using RT-PCR and histology.
RESULTS: The yield rate of mSVF obtained from MCAM was significantly higher than that with the conventional method, although use of the device resulted in a slight decrease in cell viability. After culture, mASCs exhibited a remarkable clonogenic potential and significantly higher cell proliferation potential than cASCs. The mASCs also displayed a distinct pattern of ASC cell surface markers, increased expression of genes related to CD34, high pluripotency, and a high trilineage differentiation ability.
CONCLUSIONS: The specialized device enhanced the yield of SVF and produced cells with high proliferation rates and characteristics that include expression of stem cell markers.

BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) have garnered substantial interest in regenerative medicine due to their potential to treat a wide range of conditions. Traditional enzymatic methods for isolating these cells face challenges such as high costs, lengthy processing time, and regu-latory complexities.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and practicality of non-enzymatic, mechanical methods for isolating SVF and ADSCs, comparing these to conventional enzymatic approaches.
METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria focused on non-enzymatic isolation methods for SVF and ADSCs from adipose tissue. The risk of bias was assessed, and a qualitative synthesis of findings was performed due to the methodological heterogeneity of the included studies.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting various mechanical techniques such as centrifugation, vortexing, and ultrasonic cavitation. The review identified significant variability in cell yield and viability, and the integrity of isolated cells across different non-enzymatic methods compared to enzymatic procedures. Despite some advantages of mechanical methods, including reduced processing time and avoidance of enzymatic reagents, the evidence suggests a need for optimization to match the cell quality and therapeutic efficacy achievable with enzymatic isolation.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-enzymatic, mechanical methods offer a promising alternative to enzymatic isolation of SVF and ADSCs, potentially simplifying the isolation process and reducing regulatory hurdles. However, further research is necessary to standardize these techniques and ensure consistent, high-quality cell yields for clinical applications. The development of efficient, safe, and reproducible non-enzymatic isolation methods could significantly advance the field of regenerative medicine.