Spontaneous portosystemic shunts

自发性门体分流
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门静脉动脉化(PVA)已用于肝移植(LT),以在动脉循环受损时最大化氧气输送,或已用作复杂门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的替代再灌注技术。尚未评估PVA对门静脉灌注和原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)的影响。
    目的:检查需要PVA的患者的结局与LT手术的相关性。
    方法:对2011年至2022年在圣达菲波哥大基金会接受PVA和LT的所有患者进行分析。考虑到移植物灌注的时间敏感效应,患者分为两组:再灌注前(pre-PVA),如果在移植物血运重建之前进行了动静脉吻合术,和灌注后(PVA后),如果随后进行PVA。PVA之前的基本原理考虑了门静脉血流动力学不良,严重的血管盗血,或PVT。如果移植物灌注不足变得明显,则考虑PVA后。在PVA之前尝试保守干预。
    结果:共25例:移植再灌注前15例,移植后10例。Pre-PVA患者受糖尿病的影响更大,失代偿期肝硬化,门静脉(PV)血流动力学受损,PVT。pre-PVA后PGD较少见(20.0%vs60.0%)(P=0.041)。发生PGD的患者动脉化后PV速度(25.00cm/svs73.42cm/s)(P=0.036)和流量(1.31L/minvs3.34L/min)(P=0.136)的增加较小。9例患者需要PVA闭合(中位时间:62d)。Pre-PVA和非PGD病例的生存率优于其同行(56.09个月比22.77个月和54.15个月比31.91个月,分别)。
    结论:这是LT中最大的PVA报告。结果表明,pre-PVA比post-PVA提供更好的移植物灌注。移植物高灌注对PGD有保护作用。
    BACKGROUND: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.
    METHODS: All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.
    RESULTS: A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估肝硬化患者的安全性和有效性的介入栓塞与大量自发性门体分流(SPSS)相关的难治性肝性脑病(HE)。采用治疗加权的逆概率(IPTW)来最小化潜在偏差。本研究共纳入123例患者(栓塞组34例,对照组89例)。在未经调整的队列中,栓塞组表现出明显更好的肝功能,较大的SPSS总面积,血清氨水平>60µmol/L且存在肝细胞癌(HCC)的患者比例较高(均P<0.05)。在IPTW队列中,两组基线特征具有可比性(均P>0.05)。在未调整队列和IPTW队列中,与对照组相比,栓塞组患者的无HE生存期明显更长(均P<0.05)。随后的亚组分析表明,血清氨水平>60μmol/L的患者,门静脉主干内的肝血流,孤立的SPSS的存在,基线HE等级为II级,基线时未出现HCC,栓塞治疗具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。栓塞组未出现早期手术并发症。术后远期并发症发生率与对照组相当(均P>0.05)。因此,对于伴有大SPSS的难治性HE的肝硬化患者,介入栓塞似乎是一种安全有效的治疗方式。然而,栓塞的益处仅在特定的患者亚组中可见.
    This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of interventional embolization in cirrhotic patients with refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE) associated with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize potential bias. A total of 123 patients were included in this study (34 in the embolization group and 89 in the control group). In the unadjusted cohort, the embolization group demonstrated significantly better liver function, a larger total area of SPSS, and a higher percentage of patients with serum ammonia levels > 60 µmol/L and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (all P < 0.05). In the IPTW cohort, baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the embolization group exhibited significantly longer HE-free survival compared to the control group in both the unadjusted and IPTW cohorts (both P < 0.05). Subsequent subgroup analyses indicated that patients with serum ammonia level > 60 μmol/L, hepatopetal flow within the portal trunk, the presence of solitary SPSS, a baseline HE grade of II, and the absence of HCC at baseline showed statistically significant benefit from embolization treatment (all P < 0.05). No early procedural complications were observed in the embolization group. The incidence of long-term postoperative complications was comparable to that in the control group (all P > 0.05). Hence, interventional embolization appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for cirrhotic patients with refractory HE associated with large SPSS. However, the benefits of embolization were discernible only in a specific subset of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伴有自发性门体分流(SPSS)的胃静脉曲张(GV)对于给予内窥镜氰基丙烯酸酯(CYA)注射构成相当大的风险和挑战。这项研究旨在评估EUS引导的线圈栓塞与CYA注射联合使用SPSS管理GV的常规内镜CYA注射的有效性和安全性。
    这项回顾性分析包括宁波医学中心李惠利医院(浙江,中国)2018年1月至2023年3月。患者人口统计学,程序细节,并对随访结果进行了综述。
    该研究评估了57例患者:联合治疗组21例接受EUS引导的线圈栓塞联合CYA注射,常规组36例接受常规内镜下CYA注射。这两个团队都取得了100%的技术成功率。联合组使用的CYA平均体积(1.64±0.67mL)明显低于常规组(2.38±0.72mL;P<0.001)。早期GV再出血率在两组之间没有显著差异;相反,联合治疗组晚期GV再出血的发生率明显低于常规组(4.8%vs27.8%,P=0.041)。
    EUS引导的弹簧圈栓塞联合CYA注射在减少SPSS治疗GV的晚期GV再出血方面优于常规内镜下CYA注射。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) pose considerable risks and challenges for administering endoscopic cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection compared to conventional endoscopic CYA injection for managing GV with SPSS.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis included patients with SPSS treated with either EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection or conventional CYA injection for gastric variceal bleeding at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (Zhejiang, China) between January 2018 and March 2023. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up results were reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: The study evaluated 57 patients: 21 in the combined treatment group undergoing EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection and 36 in the conventional group receiving conventional endoscopic CYA injection. Both cohorts achieved a 100% technical success rate. The mean volume of CYA used was significantly lower in the combined group (1.64 ± 0.67 mL) than in the conventional group (2.38 ± 0.72 mL; P < 0.001). Early GV rebleeding rates did not differ significantly between the groups; in contrast, the combined treatment group exhibited a considerably lower incidence of late GV rebleeding than the conventional group (4.8% vs 27.8%, P = 0.041).
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection demonstrated superiority over conventional endoscopic CYA injection in reducing late GV rebleeding in treating GV with SPSS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:自发性门体分流(SPSS)在肝硬化中很常见,并且随着肝功能恶化,其患病率增加,可能是门静脉高压恶化的结果,但没有实现对肝硬化并发症的有效保护。本研究旨在检测肝硬化患者门体分流的患病率并分析其对预后的影响。
    方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,其中92例失代偿期肝硬化患者根据病史进行评估,体检,生化检查和腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影结果。6个月后对肝硬化相关并发症的发展进行随访。
    结果:在92例肝硬化患者中,57.6%的患者通过多探测器计算机断层扫描血管造影检测到SPSS(大SPSS小SPSS)。总的来说,我们在24例(26.1%)患者中发现了较大的SPSS,29例(31.5%)患者的SPSS较小,39例(42.4%)患者无分流。在分流中,脾肾分流是最常见的类型(25,27.2%),其次是脐旁分流(20.7%)。以前的代偿失调事件,包括肝性脑病,腹水,自发性细菌性腹膜炎和胃肠道出血,大型SPSS组,其次是小型SPSS组和无SPSS组。关于后续行动,大型SPSS患者(41.7%)的肝性脑病失代偿期发作频率高于小型SPSS患者(24.1%),其次是无SPSS患者(12.8%)。
    结论:总之,所有肝硬化患者均应进行影像学检查,以检测是否存在门体分流.在一些情况下,SPSS较大的患者肝功能受损更严重,门静脉高压症的并发症也更常见.所以,这些患者可能会受益于更密切的监测和更强化的治疗.
    Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are frequent in liver cirrhosis and their prevalence increases as liver function deteriorates, probably as a consequence of worsening portal hypertension, but without achieving an effective protection against cirrhosis complications. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of portosystemic shunts in liver cirrhosis patients and analyze its prognostic role.
    We conducted a prospective observational study, where 92 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were evaluated based on history, physical examination, biochemical tests and abdominal computed tomography (CT) angiography findings. A follow-up was done after six months for the development of cirrhosis-related complications.
    Of the 92 cirrhotic patients, 57.6% had SPSS (large SPSS + small SPSS) detected by multi-detector computed tomographic angiography. Overall, we found large SPSS in 24 (26.1%) patients, small SPSS in 29 (31.5%) patients and no shunt in 39 (42.4%) patients. Among the shunts, the splenorenal shunt is the most frequent type (25, 27.2%) followed by the paraumbilical shunt (20.7%). Previous decompensating events, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastrointestinal bleed, were experienced more frequently by the large SPSS group followed by the small SPSS and without SPSS groups. Regarding follow-up, decompensating episodes of hepatic encephalopathy developed more frequently in patients with large SPSS (41.7%) than in patients with small SPSS (24.1%) followed by patients without SPSS (12.8%).
    In summary, all cirrhotic patients should be studied with radiological imaging to detect the presence of portosystemic shunts. In several cases, patients with large SPSS had a more impaired liver function and more frequent complications of portal hypertension. So, these patients would probably benefit from a closer surveillance and more intensive therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:氰基丙烯酸酯胶引起的异位栓塞,用于治疗具有明显自发性门体分流的胃底静脉曲张,是内窥镜治疗的严重并发症。本研究旨在探讨EUS引导下的线圈放置和氰基丙烯酸酯胶注射治疗有明显自发性门体分流的胃底静脉曲张的安全性和治疗效果。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究包括6例胃静脉曲张破裂出血和明显的自发性门体分流患者。我们评估了术中栓塞后静脉曲张闭塞的成功率,治疗后48h和2周的术后再出血率,异位栓塞等不良事件的发生率。7个月后进行胃镜检查和CT门静脉造影(CTPV)。
    UNASSIGNED:所有患者均在EUS指导下成功放置线圈并注射氰基丙烯酸酯胶。通过多普勒检查证实了血流,目标船只被成功封锁,内镜治疗后48h或2周后未发生再出血。内镜治疗后7个月重复胃镜检查,显示局部溃疡形成。CTPV也在内镜治疗后7个月重复,显示线圈存在于目标血管中,没有位移,门体分流血管闭塞,未发生异位栓塞。
    UNASSIGNED:对于胃底静脉曲张出血和明显的自发性门体分流患者,线圈放置结合氰基丙烯酸酯胶栓塞是一种安全有效的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Ectopic embolism caused by cyanoacrylate glue for the treatment of gastric varices with obvious spontaneous portosystemic shunts is a serious complication of endoscopic therapy. This study was performed to investigate the safety and therapeutic effect of EUS-guided coil placement and cyanoacrylate glue injection for gastric varices with obvious spontaneous portosystemic shunts.
    UNASSIGNED: Six patients with gastric variceal bleeding and obvious spontaneous portosystemic shunts were included in this study. We evaluated the success rate of variceal occlusion after intraoperative embolization, the postoperative rebleeding rate at 48 h and 2 weeks posttreatment, and the incidence of ectopic embolism and other adverse events. Gastroscopy and computed tomography portal venography (CTPV) were performed 7 months later.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients underwent successful coil placement and cyanoacrylate glue injection under EUS guidance. The blood flow was confirmed by Doppler examination, the target vessels were successfully blocked, and no rebleeding had occurred at 48 h or 2 weeks after endoscopic treatment. Gastroscopy was repeated 7 months after endoscopic treatment, revealing local ulcer formation. CTPV was also repeated 7 months after endoscopic treatment, showing that the coils were present in the target vessels with no displacement, the portosystemic shunt vessels were occluded, and no ectopic embolization had occurred.
    UNASSIGNED: The coil placement combined with cyanoacrylate glue embolism is a safe and effective method for patients with gastric variceal bleeding and obvious spontaneous portosystemic shunts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肌少症在预测肝性脑病以外的代偿失调中的作用尚不清楚。我们旨在评估肌肉减少症的预后作用,通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估,在肝移植(LT)设置之外的晚期慢性肝病(ACLD)患者的腹水发展和死亡率。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了ACLD患者的肝脏硬度测量(LSM)>10kPa,并在6个月内进行了CT扫描。肌少症定义为骨骼肌指数(SMI)分别<50和<39cm2/m2,在男人和女人。使用竞争风险回归模型来评估与主要结果相关的变量。
    结果:209例患者被纳入最终分析,134例(64.1%)出现肌肉减少症。在37(20-63)个月的中位随访中,52例患者出现腹水,24接受LT,30人死亡。发现肌肉减少症是腹水代偿失调的预测因素(SHR2.083,95%-CI:1.091-3.978),独立于具有临床意义的门静脉高压症(LSM≥21kPa或门体分流)的特征。肌肉减少症(SHR:2.744,95%-CI:1.105-6.816)和LSM≥21kPa(SHR:3.973,95%-CI:1.548-10.197)是死亡率增加的独立危险因素。
    结论:肌肉减少症和门脉高压是LT外肝硬化患者代偿失调和死亡的两个主要和独立的危险因素。
    The role of sarcopenia in predicting decompensation other than hepatic encephalopathy is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of sarcopenia, assessed by computed tomography (CT), in the development of ascites and mortality in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) outside the liver transplantation (LT) setting.
    We retrospectively evaluated ACLD patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) >10 kPa and an available CT scan within 6 months. Sarcopenia was defined as skeletal muscle index (SMI) <50 and <39 cm2/m2, respectively, in men and women. Competing risk regression models were used to assess the variables associated with the main outcomes.
    209 patients were included in the final analysis and sarcopenia was present in 134 (64.1%). During a median follow-up of 37 (20-63) months, 52 patients developed ascites, 24 underwent LT, and 30 died. Sarcopenia was found a predictive factor of decompensation with ascites (SHR 2.083, 95%-CI: 1.091-3.978), independently from the features of clinically significant portal hypertension (LSM≥21 kPa or portosystemic shunts). Sarcopenia (SHR: 2.744, 95%-CI: 1.105-6.816) and LSM≥21 kPa (SHR: 3.973, 95%-CI: 1.548-10.197) were independent risk factors for increased mortality.
    Sarcopenia and portal hypertension are two major and independent risk factors for decompensation with ascites and mortality in cirrhotic patients outside the LT context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:自发性门体分流术(SPSS)可引起肝硬化患者的难治性肝性脑病(HE)。分流栓塞(ES)可以解决HE,而选择性脾静脉栓塞(SESV)可以治疗脾肾分流相关的HE。这项研究的目的是比较ES和SESV在肝硬化患者中应用于SPSS诱导的难治性HE治疗时的临床结果。
    方法:对接受ES或SESV治疗的难治性HE患者进行回顾性分析。对两组临床治疗结果进行对比分析。
    结果:ES术后6个月死亡率明显高于SESV术后。在6个月的随访中,ES手术后白细胞和血小板计数均显著低于SESV手术后.ES后天冬氨酸转氨酶水平显着增加。然而,发现在接受SESV后6个月,白蛋白水平以及Child-Pugh评分和分级显著改善(与基线相比).
    结论:在SPSS诱导的难治性HE治疗中,SESV(与ES相比)后6个月死亡率改善。有必要进行前瞻性多中心研究进行验证。
    OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) can cause refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in cirrhotic patients. The embolization of the shunt (ES) can resolve the HE, while the selective embolization of the splenic vein (SESV) can treat splenorenal shunts related HE. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ES and SESV when applied for the treatment of SPSS-induced refractory HE in cirrhotic patients.
    METHODS: Patients with refractory HE who were treated with ES or SESV were retrospectively identified. The clinical outcomes were compared and analyzed.
    RESULTS: The 6-month mortality after the ES procedure was significantly higher than that after the SESV procedure. During the 6-month follow-up, both the white blood cell and the platelet counts were significantly lower after the ES procedure than after the SESV procedure. There was a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels after ES. However, the albumin levels as well as the Child-Pugh score and grade were found to be significantly improved at 6 months after the undertaking of an SESV (as compared with baseline).
    CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month mortality was improved after SESV (as compared with ES) in the treatment of SPSS-induced refractory HE. A prospective multicenter study for validation is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝移植(LT)期间自发性门体分流(SPSS)的最佳治疗仍存在争议。我们系统地回顾了有关定义的文献,接受SPSS的患者接受LT的治疗和结果。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,我们使用PubMed检索了1987年1月至2020年1月期间所有与SPSS和LT相关的研究.主要终点是根据SPSS管理的定义和结果(治疗与观察)。
    结果:检索到13个详细介绍962个SPSS管理的研究。血液动力学显著的SPSS被定义为41%(n=395)的患者直径≥10mm。SPSS为脾肾(42%),胃腔(15.2%),脐带缆(7.4%),肠系膜腔(n=31;3.2%),肠系膜肾(0.1%)和未报告(31.9%),分别。在LT时,处理372个分流器(38.7%),同时观察到590个分流器(61.3%)。在4个月至5年的随访时间内,除一项研究外,报告的1年总生存期(OS)无显著差异.门静脉吻合并发症(即流量减少,狭窄或血栓形成)在观察到的[n=26(4%)]和结扎的SPSS[n=10(2%)](p=0.22)中也有类似的报道,但在观察到的SPPS中,重新剖腹手术的比率显着高于观察到的SPPS(16vs2;p=0.01),以挽救LT门静脉血栓形成(n=6)并减少门静脉流量和移植物功能障碍(n=
    结论:文献中在LT期间存在SPSS的异构管理。结扎SPPS并没有减少血管并发症,也没有提高生存率。一项随机前瞻性研究可能有助于确定LT时SPSS的最佳管理。
    BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) remains debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions, treatment and outcomes of patients presenting SPSS undergoing LT.
    METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used PubMed to retrieve all studies dealing with SPSS and LT between January 1987 and January 2020. The primary endpoints were definitions and outcomes according to the management of SPSS (treatment vs observation).
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies detailing the management of 962 SPSS were retrieved. Hemodynamically significant SPSS were defined as those having diameter ≥ 10 mm in 41% (n = 395) of patients. SPSS were splenorenal (42%), cavo-gastric (15.2%), umbilical (7.4%), mesenterico-caval (n = 31; 3.2%), mesenterico-renal (0.1%) and unreported (31.9%), respectively. At the time of LT 372 shunts (38.7%) were treated while 590 were observed (61.3%). During a follow-up time ranging from 4 months to 5 years, the reported overall survival (OS) at 1 year was not significantly different except for one study. Portal vein anastomosis complications (i.e. reduced flow, stenosis or thrombosis) were similarly reported in observed [n = 26 (4%)] and ligated SPSS [n = 10 (2%)] (p = 0.22) but the rate of relaparotomy was significantly higher in observed SPPS (16 vs 2; p = 0.01) to rescue post LT portal vein thrombosis (n = 6) and reduced portal flow and graft dysfunction (n = 10).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a heterogeneous management of SPSS during LT in the literature. Ligation of SPPS did not reduce vascular complications neither improved survival. A randomized prospective study might contribute to identify best management of SPSS at time of LT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉改变,门体分流(SPSS)和轻微肝性脑病(MHE)与肝性脑病(HE)有关,然而,没有研究调查在同一患者中检测到的所有这些危险因素的相对作用。该研究的目的是评估肌肉改变对预后的影响,MHE和SPSS对肝性脑病和无移植生存率的影响。
    114例肝硬化患者接受心理测量肝性脑病评分(PHES)和动物命名试验(ANT)检测MHE。CT扫描用于分析骨骼肌指数(SMI),肌肉衰减和SPSS。估计了第一次HE发作的发生率和生存率。
    47例患者(41%)存在既往HE。与先前HE独立相关的变量是:肌少症,MHE和SPSS。44例患者(39%)在14±11个月内发生了明显的HE;MHE和SPSS是唯一与明显HE相关的变量。在同样的后续行动中,42例患者死亡(37%);MELD和肌肉减少症是唯一与无移植生存显着相关的变量。
    MHE,肌少症和SPSS是临床相关的,应在肝硬化中寻求。特别是,MHE和SPSS是与HE发展显著相关的唯一危险因素,而MELD和少肌症与总死亡率独立相关。
    Muscle alterations, portosystemic shunts (SPSS) and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) are related to hepatic encephalopathy (HE), however no studies have investigated the relative role of all these risk factors detected in the same patients. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic impact of muscle alterations, MHE and SPSS on hepatic encephalopathy and transplant free survival.
    114 cirrhotics were submitted to Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES) and Animal Naming Test (ANT) to detect MHE. CT scan was used to analyze the skeletal muscle index (SMI), muscle attenuation and SPSS. The incidence of the first episode of HE and survival were estimated.
    Previous HE was present in 47 patients (41%). The variables independently associated to previous HE were: sarcopenia, MHE and SPSS. 44 patients (39%) developed overt HE during 14±11 months; MHE and SPSS were the only variables significantly asociated to overt HE. During the same follow-up, 42 patients died (37%); MELD and sarcopenia were the only variables significantly asociated to transplant free survival.
    MHE, sarcopenia and SPSS are clinically relevant and should be sought for in cirrhotics. In particular, MHE and SPSS are the only risk factors significantly associated to the development of HE while MELD and sarcopenia are independently associated to overall mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号