Spontaneous portosystemic shunts

自发性门体分流
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门静脉动脉化(PVA)已用于肝移植(LT),以在动脉循环受损时最大化氧气输送,或已用作复杂门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的替代再灌注技术。尚未评估PVA对门静脉灌注和原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)的影响。
    目的:检查需要PVA的患者的结局与LT手术的相关性。
    方法:对2011年至2022年在圣达菲波哥大基金会接受PVA和LT的所有患者进行分析。考虑到移植物灌注的时间敏感效应,患者分为两组:再灌注前(pre-PVA),如果在移植物血运重建之前进行了动静脉吻合术,和灌注后(PVA后),如果随后进行PVA。PVA之前的基本原理考虑了门静脉血流动力学不良,严重的血管盗血,或PVT。如果移植物灌注不足变得明显,则考虑PVA后。在PVA之前尝试保守干预。
    结果:共25例:移植再灌注前15例,移植后10例。Pre-PVA患者受糖尿病的影响更大,失代偿期肝硬化,门静脉(PV)血流动力学受损,PVT。pre-PVA后PGD较少见(20.0%vs60.0%)(P=0.041)。发生PGD的患者动脉化后PV速度(25.00cm/svs73.42cm/s)(P=0.036)和流量(1.31L/minvs3.34L/min)(P=0.136)的增加较小。9例患者需要PVA闭合(中位时间:62d)。Pre-PVA和非PGD病例的生存率优于其同行(56.09个月比22.77个月和54.15个月比31.91个月,分别)。
    结论:这是LT中最大的PVA报告。结果表明,pre-PVA比post-PVA提供更好的移植物灌注。移植物高灌注对PGD有保护作用。
    BACKGROUND: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.
    METHODS: All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.
    RESULTS: A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估肝硬化患者的安全性和有效性的介入栓塞与大量自发性门体分流(SPSS)相关的难治性肝性脑病(HE)。采用治疗加权的逆概率(IPTW)来最小化潜在偏差。本研究共纳入123例患者(栓塞组34例,对照组89例)。在未经调整的队列中,栓塞组表现出明显更好的肝功能,较大的SPSS总面积,血清氨水平>60µmol/L且存在肝细胞癌(HCC)的患者比例较高(均P<0.05)。在IPTW队列中,两组基线特征具有可比性(均P>0.05)。在未调整队列和IPTW队列中,与对照组相比,栓塞组患者的无HE生存期明显更长(均P<0.05)。随后的亚组分析表明,血清氨水平>60μmol/L的患者,门静脉主干内的肝血流,孤立的SPSS的存在,基线HE等级为II级,基线时未出现HCC,栓塞治疗具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。栓塞组未出现早期手术并发症。术后远期并发症发生率与对照组相当(均P>0.05)。因此,对于伴有大SPSS的难治性HE的肝硬化患者,介入栓塞似乎是一种安全有效的治疗方式。然而,栓塞的益处仅在特定的患者亚组中可见.
    This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of interventional embolization in cirrhotic patients with refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE) associated with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize potential bias. A total of 123 patients were included in this study (34 in the embolization group and 89 in the control group). In the unadjusted cohort, the embolization group demonstrated significantly better liver function, a larger total area of SPSS, and a higher percentage of patients with serum ammonia levels > 60 µmol/L and the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (all P < 0.05). In the IPTW cohort, baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the embolization group exhibited significantly longer HE-free survival compared to the control group in both the unadjusted and IPTW cohorts (both P < 0.05). Subsequent subgroup analyses indicated that patients with serum ammonia level > 60 μmol/L, hepatopetal flow within the portal trunk, the presence of solitary SPSS, a baseline HE grade of II, and the absence of HCC at baseline showed statistically significant benefit from embolization treatment (all P < 0.05). No early procedural complications were observed in the embolization group. The incidence of long-term postoperative complications was comparable to that in the control group (all P > 0.05). Hence, interventional embolization appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for cirrhotic patients with refractory HE associated with large SPSS. However, the benefits of embolization were discernible only in a specific subset of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伴有自发性门体分流(SPSS)的胃静脉曲张(GV)对于给予内窥镜氰基丙烯酸酯(CYA)注射构成相当大的风险和挑战。这项研究旨在评估EUS引导的线圈栓塞与CYA注射联合使用SPSS管理GV的常规内镜CYA注射的有效性和安全性。
    这项回顾性分析包括宁波医学中心李惠利医院(浙江,中国)2018年1月至2023年3月。患者人口统计学,程序细节,并对随访结果进行了综述。
    该研究评估了57例患者:联合治疗组21例接受EUS引导的线圈栓塞联合CYA注射,常规组36例接受常规内镜下CYA注射。这两个团队都取得了100%的技术成功率。联合组使用的CYA平均体积(1.64±0.67mL)明显低于常规组(2.38±0.72mL;P<0.001)。早期GV再出血率在两组之间没有显著差异;相反,联合治疗组晚期GV再出血的发生率明显低于常规组(4.8%vs27.8%,P=0.041)。
    EUS引导的弹簧圈栓塞联合CYA注射在减少SPSS治疗GV的晚期GV再出血方面优于常规内镜下CYA注射。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) pose considerable risks and challenges for administering endoscopic cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection compared to conventional endoscopic CYA injection for managing GV with SPSS.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis included patients with SPSS treated with either EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection or conventional CYA injection for gastric variceal bleeding at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (Zhejiang, China) between January 2018 and March 2023. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up results were reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: The study evaluated 57 patients: 21 in the combined treatment group undergoing EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection and 36 in the conventional group receiving conventional endoscopic CYA injection. Both cohorts achieved a 100% technical success rate. The mean volume of CYA used was significantly lower in the combined group (1.64 ± 0.67 mL) than in the conventional group (2.38 ± 0.72 mL; P < 0.001). Early GV rebleeding rates did not differ significantly between the groups; in contrast, the combined treatment group exhibited a considerably lower incidence of late GV rebleeding than the conventional group (4.8% vs 27.8%, P = 0.041).
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-guided coil embolization in combination with CYA injection demonstrated superiority over conventional endoscopic CYA injection in reducing late GV rebleeding in treating GV with SPSS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝移植(LT)期间自发性门体分流(SPSS)的最佳治疗仍存在争议。我们系统地回顾了有关定义的文献,接受SPSS的患者接受LT的治疗和结果。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,我们使用PubMed检索了1987年1月至2020年1月期间所有与SPSS和LT相关的研究.主要终点是根据SPSS管理的定义和结果(治疗与观察)。
    结果:检索到13个详细介绍962个SPSS管理的研究。血液动力学显著的SPSS被定义为41%(n=395)的患者直径≥10mm。SPSS为脾肾(42%),胃腔(15.2%),脐带缆(7.4%),肠系膜腔(n=31;3.2%),肠系膜肾(0.1%)和未报告(31.9%),分别。在LT时,处理372个分流器(38.7%),同时观察到590个分流器(61.3%)。在4个月至5年的随访时间内,除一项研究外,报告的1年总生存期(OS)无显著差异.门静脉吻合并发症(即流量减少,狭窄或血栓形成)在观察到的[n=26(4%)]和结扎的SPSS[n=10(2%)](p=0.22)中也有类似的报道,但在观察到的SPPS中,重新剖腹手术的比率显着高于观察到的SPPS(16vs2;p=0.01),以挽救LT门静脉血栓形成(n=6)并减少门静脉流量和移植物功能障碍(n=
    结论:文献中在LT期间存在SPSS的异构管理。结扎SPPS并没有减少血管并发症,也没有提高生存率。一项随机前瞻性研究可能有助于确定LT时SPSS的最佳管理。
    BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) remains debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions, treatment and outcomes of patients presenting SPSS undergoing LT.
    METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used PubMed to retrieve all studies dealing with SPSS and LT between January 1987 and January 2020. The primary endpoints were definitions and outcomes according to the management of SPSS (treatment vs observation).
    RESULTS: Thirteen studies detailing the management of 962 SPSS were retrieved. Hemodynamically significant SPSS were defined as those having diameter ≥ 10 mm in 41% (n = 395) of patients. SPSS were splenorenal (42%), cavo-gastric (15.2%), umbilical (7.4%), mesenterico-caval (n = 31; 3.2%), mesenterico-renal (0.1%) and unreported (31.9%), respectively. At the time of LT 372 shunts (38.7%) were treated while 590 were observed (61.3%). During a follow-up time ranging from 4 months to 5 years, the reported overall survival (OS) at 1 year was not significantly different except for one study. Portal vein anastomosis complications (i.e. reduced flow, stenosis or thrombosis) were similarly reported in observed [n = 26 (4%)] and ligated SPSS [n = 10 (2%)] (p = 0.22) but the rate of relaparotomy was significantly higher in observed SPPS (16 vs 2; p = 0.01) to rescue post LT portal vein thrombosis (n = 6) and reduced portal flow and graft dysfunction (n = 10).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a heterogeneous management of SPSS during LT in the literature. Ligation of SPPS did not reduce vascular complications neither improved survival. A randomized prospective study might contribute to identify best management of SPSS at time of LT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and debilitating complication of chronic liver disease. Recurrent HE is strongly linked with spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs). Intrahepatic arterioportal fistulas (IAPFs) occur rarely but pose a major clinical challenge and may lead to or worsen portal hypertension. Herein, we present a rare case of recurrent HE secondary to a SPSS combined with an IAPF.
    METHODS: A 63-year-old female with primary biliary cirrhosis presented with recurrent disturbance of consciousness for 4 mo. SPSS communicating the superior mesenteric vein with the inferior vena cava and IAPF linking the intrahepatic artery with the portal vein were found on contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography. The patient did not respond well to medical treatment. Therefore, simultaneous embolization of SPSS and IAPF was scheduled. After embolization, the symptoms of HE showed obvious resolution.
    CONCLUSIONS: The presence of liver vascular disorders should not be neglected in patients with chronic liver disease, and interventional therapy is a reasonable choice in such patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Liver cirrhosis is frequently complicated by spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) due to portal hypertension. Shunt embolization is considered when symptoms related to SPSSs are refractory to endoscopic and/or medical therapies. However, little information is available on the treatment of patients with multiple and large SPSS. We report a successfully managed case in which patient with such SPSS received two embolization procedures within 6 months. A 57-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis was transferred to our hospital due to a ruptured gastric varix. CT examination showed gastrorenal and splenorenal shunts of 8 mm and 11 mm in diameter, respectively. In addition, multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were noted. First, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) was performed for the gastrorenal shunt, resulting in the disappearance of the varix, followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCCs. However, the hepatic encephalopathy worsened after the BRTO and TACE, and the splenorenal shunt enlarged to 18 mm in diameter. Although the shunt was tortuous and had another drainage vein, we completed the embolization for the shunt using metallic coils without any events. The patient\'s hepatic encephalopathy and hepatic function were ameliorated after embolization for the splenorenal shunt, and the patient was free from hepatic encephalopathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of covert hepatic encephalopathy (cHE) and its characteristics according to the presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) and their influence on the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
    Secondary analysis of a multicentre study, which evaluated the association between SPSS and complications of cirrhosis. The present study population includes those patients who also underwent cHE diagnostic evaluation. Presence of SPSS was evaluated by cross-sectional imaging and quantified by total SPSS-area. Logistic and Cox-regression competing risk analyses were performed.
    About 65 patients were included of age 58 (IQR 50-66), MELD 15 (IQR 10-20), with alcoholic liver disease 63%. Thirty-two patients (49%) had cHE, had higher MELD [16 (IQR 12-24) vs 13 (IQR 9-17), P = .027], a greater proportion of SPSS [n = 18 (56%) vs n = 8 (24%); P = .008] and a higher total cross-sectional SPSS-area [28.3 (0-94.2) vs 0 (0-14.1); P = .005]. On multivariate analysis MELD [OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.01-1.21)] and presence of SPSS [OR 3.95 (95% CI 1.22-12.80)] were independently associated to cHE at baseline. During follow-up cHE was an independent predictor of oHE [cHE: HR 6.93 (95% CI 2.64-18.20). The effect of cHE on the development of oHE was greater in patients with SPSS [only cHE: HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.82-17.62), cHE and SPSS: HR 8.63 (95% CI 3.15-23.65)].
    cHE is independently associated to the presence of SPSS (and total cross-sectional SPSS-area) and MELD. Furthermore, the presence of SPSS seems to increase the risk of cHE of developing of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号