Small-cell lung cancer

小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨Hu抗体与人类白细胞抗原(HLA)和副肿瘤神经综合征(PNS)的关系。以及根据临床表现和癌症状态的潜在特异性。
    方法:从可用的全基因组关联数据估算4位数分辨率的HLA基因型。比较患者之间的等位基因携带者频率(整个队列,n=100,并且根据临床表现和癌症状态)和匹配的健康对照(n=508),使用由三个主要主成分控制的逻辑回归。
    结果:100例抗Hu患者的临床表现涉及中枢神经系统(28,28%),周围神经系统(36,36%)或两者结合(36,36%)。75(75%)的癌症诊断是肯定的。HLA关联分析显示,抗HuPNS患者更频繁地携带DQA1*05:01(39%vs.19%,OR=2.8[1.74-4.49]),DQB1*02:01(39%与18%,OR=2.88[1.79-4.64])和DRB1*03:01(41%与19%,OR=2.92[1.80-4.73])比健康对照组高。值得注意的是,这种DR3~DQ2的关联在纯中枢受累患者中不存在,但更具体的是那些表现为周围受累的人:DQA1*05:01(OR=3.12[1.48-6.60]),DQB1*02:01(OR=3.35[1.57-7.15])和DRB1*03:01(OR=3.62[1.64-7.97]);在感觉神经病变的情况下甚至更强,DQA1*05:01(OR=4.41[1.89-10.33]),DQB1*02:01(OR=4.85[2.04-11.53])和DRB1*03:01(OR=5.79[2.28-14.74])。同样,DR3~DQ2相关性仅在癌症患者中观察到。
    结论:抗HuPNS患者根据临床表现显示不同的HLA谱,可能,癌症状态,提示病理生理差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) with Hu antibodies, and potential specificities according to clinical presentation and cancer status.
    METHODS: HLA genotypes at four-digit resolution were imputed from available genome-wide association data. Allele carrier frequencies were compared between patients (whole cohort, n = 100, and according to clinical presentation and cancer status) and matched healthy controls (n = 508) using logistic regression controlled by the three main principal components.
    RESULTS: The clinical presentation of 100 anti-Hu patients involved the central nervous system (28, 28%), the peripheral nervous system (36, 36%) or both combined (36, 36%). Cancer diagnosis was certain in 75 (75%). HLA association analyses revealed that anti-Hu PNS patients were more frequently carriers of DQA1*05:01 (39% vs. 19%, OR = 2.8 [1.74-4.49]), DQB1*02:01 (39% vs. 18%, OR = 2.88 [1.79-4.64]) and DRB1*03:01 (41% vs. 19%, OR = 2.92 [1.80-4.73]) than healthy controls. Remarkably, such DR3 ~ DQ2 association was absent in patients with pure central involvement, but more specific to those manifesting with peripheral involvement: DQA1*05:01 (OR = 3.12 [1.48-6.60]), DQB1*02:01 (OR = 3.35 [1.57-7.15]) and DRB1*03:01 (OR = 3.62 [1.64-7.97]); being even stronger in cases with sensory neuropathy, DQA1*05:01 (OR = 4.41 [1.89-10.33]), DQB1*02:01 (OR = 4.85 [2.04-11.53]) and DRB1*03:01 (OR = 5.79 [2.28-14.74]). Similarly, DR3 ~ DQ2 association was only observed in patients with cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with anti-Hu PNS show different HLA profiles according to clinical presentation and, probably, cancer status, suggesting pathophysiological differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年营养风险指数(GNRI)根据血清白蛋白浓度和理想体重指示营养状况。预处理GNRI已被认为是各种恶性肿瘤的预后因素。然而,关于GNRI对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的临床价值知之甚少,尤其是老年患者。
    我们回顾性分析了53例老年(≥71例)广泛性疾病(ED)SCLC患者接受一线铂双联化疗与治疗前GNRI水平的关系。
    36例GNRI低(<92)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)在统计学上比17例GNRI高(≥92)患者差(中位PFS=80天vs.133天,分别为;p=0.002;中位OS=123天与274天,分别为;p=0.004)。在多变量分析中,低GNRI也是PFS的独立不良预后因素[风险比(HR)=0.396;95%置信区间(CI)=0.199-0.789;p=0.008]和OS(HR=0.295;95CI=0.143-0.608;p<0.001).
    GNRI可能是接受铂类双联化疗的老年ED-SCLC患者的预测和预后标志物。
    UNASSIGNED: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) indicates nutritional status based on serum albumin concentration and ideal body weight. Pretreatment GNRI has been suggested as a prognostic factor for various malignancies. However, little is known about the clinical value of GNRI for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), especially in elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed 53 elderly (≥71) patients with extensive-disease (ED) SCLC treated with first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy in relation to the pretreatment GNRI level in a real-world setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six patients with a low GNRI (<92) had statistically poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than 17 patients with a high GNRI (≥92) (median PFS=80 days vs. 133 days, respectively; p=0.002; median OS=123 days vs. 274 days, respectively; p=0.004). In a multivariate analysis, a low GNRI was also an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.396; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.199-0.789; p=0.008] and OS (HR=0.295; 95%CI=0.143-0.608; p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The GNRI might be a predictive and prognostic marker in elderly patients with ED-SCLC treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    来自免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的免疫相关不良事件之一是皮肤毒性。口服皮质类固醇是严重皮肤免疫相关不良事件的一线治疗。然而,皮质类固醇可能与ICIs的疗效相冲突.一名有寻常型银屑病病史的55岁日本男子被诊断为小细胞肺癌(ⅣA期),并进行了联合化学免疫治疗,包括阿妥珠单抗,导致牛皮癣恶化。作为回应,他接受了生物制剂治疗,如抗IL-23和IL-17抗体,risankizumab,苏金单抗,分别,并通过阿司珠单抗持续治疗实现长期生存.该病例报告表明,生物制剂可能是ICI治疗引起的自身免疫相关不良事件的最佳治疗方案。
    One of the immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is skin toxicity. Oral corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for severe cutaneous immune-related adverse events. However, corticosteroids may conflict with the efficacy of ICIs. A 55-year-old Japanese man with a history of psoriasis vulgaris was diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (Stage ⅣA) and administered combined chemoimmunotherapy, including atezolizumab, which resulted in exacerbation of psoriasis. In response, he was treated with biological agents, such as anti-IL-23 and IL-17 antibodies, risankizumab, and secukinumab, respectively, and achieved long-term survival with continued treatment with atezolizumab. This case report suggests that biological agents might be the best course of treatment against autoimmune-related adverse events caused by ICI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是最致命的肺癌形式。肿瘤内异质性,以神经内分泌(NE)和非神经内分泌(非NE)细胞状态为标志,定义SCLC,但对SCLC可塑性的细胞外在驱动因素知之甚少。要绘制SCLC肿瘤微环境(TME)的景观,我们将空间分辨转录组学和基于定量质谱的蛋白质组学应用于通过快速尸检获得的转移性SCLC肿瘤.TME中非恶性细胞的表型和总体组成表现出实质性的变异性。密切反映肿瘤表型,表明TME驱动的NE细胞状态的重编程。我们确定癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)是SCLCTME异质性的关键因素,有助于免疫排斥,并预测异常不良的预后。我们的工作提供了SCLC肿瘤和TME生态系统的全面地图,强调它们在SCLC适应性中的关键作用,为重新编程塑造SCLC肿瘤状态的TME-肿瘤通信开辟了可能性。
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most fatal form of lung cancer. Intratumoral heterogeneity, marked by neuroendocrine (NE) and non-neuroendocrine (non-NE) cell states, defines SCLC, but the cell-extrinsic drivers of SCLC plasticity are poorly understood. To map the landscape of SCLC tumor microenvironment (TME), we apply spatially resolved transcriptomics and quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics to metastatic SCLC tumors obtained via rapid autopsy. The phenotype and overall composition of non-malignant cells in the TME exhibit substantial variability, closely mirroring the tumor phenotype, suggesting TME-driven reprogramming of NE cell states. We identify cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as a crucial element of SCLC TME heterogeneity, contributing to immune exclusion, and predicting exceptionally poor prognosis. Our work provides a comprehensive map of SCLC tumor and TME ecosystems, emphasizing their pivotal role in SCLC\'s adaptable nature, opening possibilities for reprogramming the TME-tumor communications that shape SCLC tumor states.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们探索了接受Durvalumab(D)+曲美木单抗(T)+依托泊苷铂(EP)治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的免疫治疗反应的潜在预测生物标志物,D+EP,或EP在随机3期CASPIAN试验中。
    方法:805例未治疗的ES-SCLC患者随机(1:1:1)接受D+T+EP,D+EP,或EP。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。患者在筛选时需要提供存档的肿瘤组织块(或≥15个新切割的未染色载玻片),如果这些样本存在。在评估程序性细胞死亡配体-1表达和组织肿瘤突变负担后,残余组织用于其他分子谱分析,包括通过RNA测序和免疫组织化学.
    结果:在182例转录分子亚型患者中,在SCLC炎症亚型中,具有D±TEP的OS在数值上最高(n=10,中位数24.0个月)。患者从不同亚型的免疫疗法中获益;因此,研究了其他生物标志物.通过免疫组织化学,高CD8A表达/低CD8细胞密度与D±TEP相比,EP的OS益处更大。但D+T+EP与D+EP相比没有额外益处。D+T+EP与D+EP的OS获益与CD4高表达相关(中位数25.9vs.11.4个月)和抗原呈递和加工机械(25.9vs.14.6个月)和MHCI和II(23.6与17.3个月)基因签名,免疫组织化学显示MHCI表达较高。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,肿瘤微环境对于调节ES-SCLC中D±T+EP的更好结局很重要,与与假设的免疫治疗作用机制相关的经典免疫标记物定义了对D±T。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03043872。
    BACKGROUND: We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.
    METHODS: 805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.
    RESULTS: In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨临床T1-2N0M0(cT1-2N0M0)小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者隐匿性淋巴结转移(OLM)的发生率,并使用术前瘤内和瘤周对比增强CT影像数据开发机器学习预测模型。
    方法:通过对4个百分点的242名合格患者进行回顾性分析,我们确定了cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者OLM的发生率。对于每个病变,使用肿瘤总体积(GTV)和肿瘤周围15mm的瘤周体积(PTV)定义两个ROI。通过从GTV和PTV中分别提取一组完整的1595个增强的基于CT的放射学特征,构建了五个模型,我们使用各种指标严格评估了模型性能,包括曲线下面积(AUC),准确度,灵敏度,特异性,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。为了增强临床适用性,我们制定了一个结合临床参数和rad_score(GTV和PTV)的列线图.
    结果:初步调查显示cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的OLM阳性率为33.9%。我们的组合模型,结合了GTV和PTV的三个放射学特征,以及两个临床参数(吸烟状况和形状),表现出强大的预测能力。外部验证队列的AUC峰值为0.772,该模型的性能优于替代模型。列线图显着提高了放射科医师的诊断精度,并为cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的临床决策过程增加了实质价值。
    结论:SCLC患者OLM的发生率超过非小细胞肺癌患者。组合模型表现出显著的泛化效应,以无创方式有效区分阳性和阴性OLM,从而指导cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的个体化临床决策。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the incidence of occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) in clinical T1 - 2N0M0 (cT1 - 2N0M0) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and develop machine learning prediction models using preoperative intratumoral and peritumoral contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomic data.
    METHODS: By conducting a retrospective analysis involving 242 eligible patients from 4 centeres, we determined the incidence of OLM in cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients. For each lesion, two ROIs were defined using the gross tumour volume (GTV) and peritumoral volume 15 mm around the tumour (PTV). By extracting a comprehensive set of 1595 enhanced CT-based radiomic features individually from the GTV and PTV, five models were constucted and we rigorously evaluated the model performance using various metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). For enhanced clinical applicability, we formulated a nomogram that integrates clinical parameters and the rad_score (GTV and PTV).
    RESULTS: The initial investigation revealed a 33.9% OLM positivity rate in cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients. Our combined model, which incorporates three radiomic features from the GTV and PTV, along with two clinical parameters (smoking status and shape), exhibited robust predictive capabilities. With a peak AUC value of 0.772 in the external validation cohort, the model outperformed the alternative models. The nomogram significantly enhanced diagnostic precision for radiologists and added substantial value to the clinical decision-making process for cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of OLM in SCLC patients surpassed that in non-small cell lung cancer patients. The combined model demonstrated a notable generalization effect, effectively distinguishing between positive and negative OLMs in a noninvasive manner, thereby guiding individualized clinical decisions for patients with cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UICCIV期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,没有治愈性治疗选择。一些随机试验表明,通过在基于铂的一线化疗中添加检查点抑制剂,可以提高生存率。因此,化疗和免疫疗法的结合已成为标准的姑息治疗.然而,没有可靠的预测治疗反应的生物标志物.PD-L1表达和肿瘤突变负担均未被证明是有效的预测性生物标志物。在这项研究中,我们比较了SCLC患者与健康对照组的细胞免疫状态,并调查了外周血B的变化,T,和NK淋巴细胞,以及它们各自的几个子集,在使用流式细胞术进行免疫化疗(ICT)治疗期间。我们的发现揭示了B细胞的显著减少,而T细胞在整个ICT中显示出增加的趋势。值得注意的是,高水平的耗尽的CD4+和CD8+细胞,除了NK亚群,在治疗期间显著增加。此外,我们将两个周期的ICT后亚群的减少/增加与生存率相关.具体来说,Th17细胞减少表明总体存活率较好.基于这些发现,我们建议对接受IV期SCLC姑息性ICT患者的Th17细胞作为潜在的早期预测生物标志物进行进一步研究.
    UICC stage IV small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy without curative treatment options. Several randomized trials have demonstrated improved survival rates through the addition of checkpoint inhibitors to first-line platin-based chemotherapy. Consequently, a combination of chemo- and immunotherapy has become standard palliative treatment. However, no reliable predictive biomarkers for treatment response exist. Neither PD-L1 expression nor tumor mutational burden have proven to be effective predictive biomarkers. In this study, we compared the cellular immune statuses of SCLC patients to a healthy control cohort and investigated changes in peripheral blood B, T, and NK lymphocytes, as well as several of their respective subsets, during treatment with immunochemotherapy (ICT) using flow cytometry. Our findings revealed a significant decrease in B cells, while T cells showed a trend to increase throughout ICT. Notably, high levels of exhausted CD4+ and CD8+ cells, alongside NK subsets, increased significantly during treatment. Furthermore, we correlated decreases/increases in subsets after two cycles of ICT with survival. Specifically, a decrease in Th17 cells indicated a better overall survival. Based on these findings, we suggest conducting further investigation into Th17 cells as a potential early predictive biomarkers for response in patients receiving palliative ICT for stage IV SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经内分泌癌(NECs)是极其致命的恶性肿瘤,几乎可以在任何解剖部位出现。NEC的表征受到它们的稀有性和显著的组织间和组织内异质性的阻碍。在这里,通过对来自31个不同组织的1000多个NEC的综合分析,我们揭示了它们与组织无关的趋同,并进一步揭示了由不同转录调节因子驱动的分子分歧。因此,泛组织NEC被归类为由ASCL1,NEUROD1,HNF4A,POU2F3和YAP1。描绘了这些亚型的全面肖像,突出亚型特异性转录程序,基因组改变,演化轨迹,治疗漏洞,和临床病理表现。值得注意的是,新发现的以HNF4A为主的H亚型表现出胃肠道样特征,野生型RB1,独特的神经内分泌分化,化疗反应差,和普遍的大细胞形态。统一分类范式的提议阐明了NEC异质性的转录基础,并弥合了不同谱系和细胞形态学变异之间的差距。其中亚型的环境依赖性患病率是其表型差异的基础。
    Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are extremely lethal malignancies that can arise at almost any anatomic site. Characterization of NECs is hindered by their rarity and significant inter- and intra-tissue heterogeneity. Herein, through an integrative analysis of over 1,000 NECs originating from 31 various tissues, we reveal their tissue-independent convergence and further unveil molecular divergence driven by distinct transcriptional regulators. Pan-tissue NECs are therefore categorized into five intrinsic subtypes defined by ASCL1, NEUROD1, HNF4A, POU2F3, and YAP1. A comprehensive portrait of these subtypes is depicted, highlighting subtype-specific transcriptional programs, genomic alterations, evolution trajectories, therapeutic vulnerabilities, and clinicopathological presentations. Notably, the newly discovered HNF4A-dominated subtype-H exhibits a gastrointestinal-like signature, wild-type RB1, unique neuroendocrine differentiation, poor chemotherapeutic response, and prevalent large-cell morphology. The proposal of uniform classification paradigm illuminates transcriptional basis of NEC heterogeneity and bridges the gap across different lineages and cytomorphological variants, in which context-dependent prevalence of subtypes underlies their phenotypic disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种生物学侵袭性的肺癌亚型,一种以肿瘤快速生长为特征的致命疾病,早期复发,早期广泛转移的强烈趋势,和高度的基因组不稳定性,使其成为现代肿瘤学实践中的强大敌人。虽然非SCLC的管理在免疫治疗时代已经发生了革命性的变化,SCLC的进展更加缓慢。最近的随机III期临床试验已将程序性死亡配体-1抑制剂与化疗骨干结合,并证明了生存率的提高;然而,观察到的绝对益处是短月。不可否认,迫切需要更好的应对措施,更好的特工,新的治疗方法,更理性,生物标志物驱动的SCLC临床试验。在这次审查中,我们讨论了免疫疗法现代时代对SCLC生物学的基本原理和当前理解,讨论改变全球临床实践的一线免疫治疗方法的最新进展,概述了SCLC中交错免疫检查点阻断的一些挑战和限制,并探索目前正在研究的一些新的免疫治疗方法。
    Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a biologically aggressive subtype of lung cancer, a lethal disease characterized by rapid tumor growth, early relapse, a strong tendency for early widespread metastasis, and high genomic instability, making it a formidable foe in modern oncology practice. While the management of non-SCLC has been revolutionized in the era of immunotherapy, progress in SCLC has been more muted. Recent randomized phase III clinical trials have combined programmed death ligand-1 inhibitors to a chemotherapy backbone and demonstrated improved survival; however, the absolute benefit observed is short months. There is an undeniable urgent need for better responses, better agents, novel therapeutic approaches, and more rational, biomarker-driven clinical trials in SCLC. In this review, we discuss the rationale and current understanding of the biology of SCLC in the modern era of immunotherapy, discuss recent advances in front-line immunotherapeutic approaches that have changed clinical practice globally, provide an overview of some of the challenges and limitations that have staggered immune checkpoint blockade in SCLC, and explore some of the novel immunotherapeutic approaches currently being investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,目前尚无有效的措施来预测小细胞肺癌(SCLC)化疗的疗效.我们期望开发一种在临床实践中有效预测SCLC化疗疗效和预后的方法,以便为个体患者提供更有针对性的治疗方案。
    方法:我们采用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF-MS)和ClinProTools系统检测154例标准化疗疗效不同的SCLC患者的血清样本,并分析SCLC患者的不同肽/蛋白,以发现与化疗疗效相关的预测肿瘤标志物。10个肽/蛋白峰在两组间有显著差异。
    结果:从训练组开发了由四种肽/蛋白质组成的遗传算法模型,以分离具有不同化疗疗效的患者。其中,三种肽/蛋白(m/z3323.35,6649.03和6451.08)在疾病进展组中高表达,而m/z4283.18的肽/蛋白在疾病反应组中高表达。分类器在验证组中表现出91.4%(53/58)的准确度。生存分析显示,疾病缓解组30例SCLC患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为9.0个月;疾病进展组28例,中位PFS为3.0个月,差异有统计学意义(χ2=46.98,P<0.001)。两组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为13.0个月和7.0个月,差异有统计学意义(χ2=40.64,P<0.001)。
    结论:这些肽/蛋白可作为潜在的生物学标志物,用于预测接受标准方案化疗的SCLC患者的疗效和预后。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, no effective measures are available to predict the curative efficacy of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) chemotherapy. We expect to develop a method for effectively predicting the SCLC chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis in clinical practice in order to offer more pertinent therapeutic protocols for individual patients.
    METHODS: We adopted matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and ClinPro Tools system to detect serum samples from 154 SCLC patients with different curative efficacy of standard chemotherapy and analyze the different peptides/proteins of SCLC patients to discover predictive tumor markers related to chemotherapy efficacy. Ten peptide/protein peaks were significantly different in the two groups.
    RESULTS: A genetic algorithm model consisting of four peptides/proteins was developed from the training group to separate patients with different chemotherapy efficacies. Among them, three peptides/proteins (m/z 3323.35, 6649.03 and 6451.08) showed high expression in the disease progression group, whereas the peptide/protein at m/z 4283.18 was highly expressed in the disease response group. The classifier exhibited an accuracy of 91.4% (53/58) in the validation group. The survival analysis showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of 30 SCLC patients in disease response group was 9.0 months; in 28 cases in disease progression group, the median PFS was 3.0 months, a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 46.98, P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the two groups was 13.0 months and 7.0 months, a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 40.64, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: These peptides/proteins may be used as potential biological markers for prediction of the curative efficacy and prognosis for SCLC patients treated with standard regimen chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号