Small-cell lung cancer

小细胞肺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂与化疗联合治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的安全性仍未完全阐明。
    方法:我们对PubMed进行了全面的搜索,Embase,和Cochrane数据库,用于研究在标准研究者选择化疗中添加PD-1或PD-L1抑制剂的随机对照试验。我们对所有终点使用了95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。
    结果:纳入了6项研究和2,995名患者。在基线,患者的中位年龄从62岁到65岁不等,311(10.4%)有脑转移,1,060(35.4%)有肝转移。发现PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂可降低致命毒性相关的死亡率(RR:0.85;95%CI:0.80-0.91;p<0.001;I2=49%)。干预组食欲下降的发生率较高(RR:1.19;95%CI:1.02-1.40;p=0.03;I2=0%),低钠血症(RR:1.51;95%CI:1.08-2.12;p=0.02;I2=0%),和甲状腺功能减退(RR:3.14;95%CI:1.10-8.95;p=0.03;I2=81%)。关于3-4级不良事件,添加PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与任何评估结果的发生率增加没有关联。
    结论:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,在化疗中加入PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂证明了良好的安全性,并且是重塑广泛期小细胞肺癌患者既定治疗模式的有希望的前景.
    OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors when associated with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is still not fully unraveled.
    METHODS: We performed a comprehensive searrch of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated the addition of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors to standard investigator choice chemotherapy. We used risk -ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all endpoints.
    RESULTS: Six studies and 2,995 patients were included. At the baseline, the median age of the patients varied from 62 to 65 years, 311 (10.4%) had brain metastases, and 1,060 (35.4%) had liver metastases. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were found to reduce fatal toxicities-related mortality (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80-0.91; p < 0.001; I2 = 49%). The intervention group had a higher incidence of decreased appetite (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.40; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), hyponatremia (RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08-2.12; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and hypothyroidism (RR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.10-8.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 81%) of any grade. Regarding adverse events of grade 3-4, there was no association of the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with an increased occurrence of any of the evaluated outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the incorporation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy demonstrated an excellent safety profile and to be a promising prospect for reshaping the established treatment paradigms for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性研究评估了康瑞珠单抗联合安洛替尼与化疗对接受二线治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的疗效。
    数据来自中国医疗机构的医疗记录,涉及34例一线治疗失败后诊断为ES-SCLC的患者。患者分为两组:一组接受卡利珠单抗(每3周200mg)和安洛替尼(每天12mg,共14天,然后休息7天)。而另一组接受医生选择的化疗每3周一次.主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR)。
    与化疗组相比,联合治疗组的PFS显着改善(中位PFS:7个月与3个月;风险比(HR):0.34;95%置信区间(CI):0.15-0.77;p<0.001)。然而,两组之间的OS无统计学差异(16.3个月vs.17.3个月;p=0.82)。联合治疗组的ORR为52.9%,而化疗组为23.5%(p=0.08),DCR为82.4%,为58.8%(p=0.26)。在联合治疗组的17.6%和化疗组的29.4%中观察到3级或更高的不良事件。
    研究结果表明,卡姆瑞珠单抗和安洛替尼的组合在二线环境中对ES-SCLC患者提供了优异的抗肿瘤反应和可控的安全性。这种组合方案可能是二线ES-SCLC治疗的可行选择。
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) undergoing second-line treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were sourced from medical records at a Chinese medical facility, involving 34 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC after failing first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: one received camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) with anlotinib (12 mg daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest), while the other group received physician-chosen chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).
    UNASSIGNED: The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in PFS compared to the chemotherapy group (median PFS: 7 months vs. 3 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.77; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (16.3 months vs. 17.3 months; p=0.82). The ORR was 52.9% in the combination therapy group versus 23.5% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.08), and the DCR was 82.4% compared to 58.8% (p=0.26). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 17.6% of the combination therapy group and 29.4% of the chemotherapy group.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and anlotinib offers a superior anti-tumor response with a manageable safety profile in a second-line setting for ES-SCLC patients. This combination regimen may be a viable option for second-line ES-SCLC treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们探索了接受Durvalumab(D)+曲美木单抗(T)+依托泊苷铂(EP)治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的免疫治疗反应的潜在预测生物标志物,D+EP,或EP在随机3期CASPIAN试验中。
    方法:805例未治疗的ES-SCLC患者随机(1:1:1)接受D+T+EP,D+EP,或EP。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。患者在筛选时需要提供存档的肿瘤组织块(或≥15个新切割的未染色载玻片),如果这些样本存在。在评估程序性细胞死亡配体-1表达和组织肿瘤突变负担后,残余组织用于其他分子谱分析,包括通过RNA测序和免疫组织化学.
    结果:在182例转录分子亚型患者中,在SCLC炎症亚型中,具有D±TEP的OS在数值上最高(n=10,中位数24.0个月)。患者从不同亚型的免疫疗法中获益;因此,研究了其他生物标志物.通过免疫组织化学,高CD8A表达/低CD8细胞密度与D±TEP相比,EP的OS益处更大。但D+T+EP与D+EP相比没有额外益处。D+T+EP与D+EP的OS获益与CD4高表达相关(中位数25.9vs.11.4个月)和抗原呈递和加工机械(25.9vs.14.6个月)和MHCI和II(23.6与17.3个月)基因签名,免疫组织化学显示MHCI表达较高。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,肿瘤微环境对于调节ES-SCLC中D±T+EP的更好结局很重要,与与假设的免疫治疗作用机制相关的经典免疫标记物定义了对D±T。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03043872。
    BACKGROUND: We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.
    METHODS: 805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.
    RESULTS: In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨临床T1-2N0M0(cT1-2N0M0)小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者隐匿性淋巴结转移(OLM)的发生率,并使用术前瘤内和瘤周对比增强CT影像数据开发机器学习预测模型。
    方法:通过对4个百分点的242名合格患者进行回顾性分析,我们确定了cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者OLM的发生率。对于每个病变,使用肿瘤总体积(GTV)和肿瘤周围15mm的瘤周体积(PTV)定义两个ROI。通过从GTV和PTV中分别提取一组完整的1595个增强的基于CT的放射学特征,构建了五个模型,我们使用各种指标严格评估了模型性能,包括曲线下面积(AUC),准确度,灵敏度,特异性,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。为了增强临床适用性,我们制定了一个结合临床参数和rad_score(GTV和PTV)的列线图.
    结果:初步调查显示cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的OLM阳性率为33.9%。我们的组合模型,结合了GTV和PTV的三个放射学特征,以及两个临床参数(吸烟状况和形状),表现出强大的预测能力。外部验证队列的AUC峰值为0.772,该模型的性能优于替代模型。列线图显着提高了放射科医师的诊断精度,并为cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的临床决策过程增加了实质价值。
    结论:SCLC患者OLM的发生率超过非小细胞肺癌患者。组合模型表现出显著的泛化效应,以无创方式有效区分阳性和阴性OLM,从而指导cT1-2N0M0SCLC患者的个体化临床决策。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the incidence of occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) in clinical T1 - 2N0M0 (cT1 - 2N0M0) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and develop machine learning prediction models using preoperative intratumoral and peritumoral contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomic data.
    METHODS: By conducting a retrospective analysis involving 242 eligible patients from 4 centeres, we determined the incidence of OLM in cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients. For each lesion, two ROIs were defined using the gross tumour volume (GTV) and peritumoral volume 15 mm around the tumour (PTV). By extracting a comprehensive set of 1595 enhanced CT-based radiomic features individually from the GTV and PTV, five models were constucted and we rigorously evaluated the model performance using various metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). For enhanced clinical applicability, we formulated a nomogram that integrates clinical parameters and the rad_score (GTV and PTV).
    RESULTS: The initial investigation revealed a 33.9% OLM positivity rate in cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients. Our combined model, which incorporates three radiomic features from the GTV and PTV, along with two clinical parameters (smoking status and shape), exhibited robust predictive capabilities. With a peak AUC value of 0.772 in the external validation cohort, the model outperformed the alternative models. The nomogram significantly enhanced diagnostic precision for radiologists and added substantial value to the clinical decision-making process for cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of OLM in SCLC patients surpassed that in non-small cell lung cancer patients. The combined model demonstrated a notable generalization effect, effectively distinguishing between positive and negative OLMs in a noninvasive manner, thereby guiding individualized clinical decisions for patients with cT1 - 2N0M0 SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关于有限期(LS)小细胞肺癌(SCLC)如何在化疗的同时进行胸部放疗(TRT)的临床数据有限。我们回顾了一项随机II期试验中的放射治疗计划,比较高剂量与标准剂量每日两次TRT,以评估治疗计划技术。靶体积和危险器官(OAR)的剂量体积数据,评估对协议的遵守情况,与辐射诱导的毒性相关,以及治疗计划参数的不平衡是否可能是高剂量大生存获益的原因(中位总生存43.6vs.22.6个月)。
    方法:170例患者接受4个疗程的铂/依托泊苷,并随机接受每日两次60Gy/40分数(fx)或45Gy/30fx的TRT。分析了那些接受一个或多个fx的TRT(n=166)的TRT治疗计划。
    结果:最常见的治疗计划技术是3DCRT(67%)。两组OAR报告的剂量-体积参数的第75百分位数均在方案推荐的范围内。食道平均剂量为25.5Gy(IQR:20.2-31.3)[60Gy/40fx]和24.3Gy(IQR:20.3-27.5)[45Gy/30fx]与21%和18%≥3级急性食管炎相关,分别。在60Gy/40fx组中,肺的平均剂量为16.5Gy(IQR:15.8-16.9),V20Gy为29.5%(IQR:28.8-30.4),V5Gy为65.6%(IQR:61.5-68.7)导致4%的患者≥3级肺炎。45Gy组无≥3级肺炎。治疗计划技术,原始和重新划定的OAR之间的体积变化百分比,PTV音量,相对剂量,随机分配组之间的偏侧性平衡良好。
    结论:考虑到严重辐射所致毒性的发生率在其他近期试验的范围内,报告给OAR的剂量似乎是安全的。随机分配组之间的治疗计划参数平衡良好,支持每日两次60Gy/40fxTRT方案的生存益处是由于较高的剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: There is limited clinical data for recommendations on how to deliver thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) concurrently with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. We reviewed radiation therapy treatment plans in a randomized phase 2 trial comparing high-dose with standard-dose twice-daily TRT to assess treatment planning techniques, dose-volume data for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs), evaluate compliance with the protocol, associations with radiation-induced toxicity, and whether an imbalance in treatment planning parameters might be a reason for the large survival benefit of the higher dose (median overall survival 43.6 vs 22.6 months).
    METHODS: In the study, 170 patients were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to receive twice-daily TRT of 60 Gy/40 fractions (fx) or 45 Gy/30 fx. TRT treatment plans for those who received 1 or more fx of TRT (n = 166) were analyzed.
    RESULTS: The most common treatment planning technique was 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (67%). The 75th percentile of the reported dose-volume parameters for the OARs were within the protocol-recommended limits for both groups. Mean doses to the esophagus of 25.5 Gy (IQR, 20.2-31.3; 60 Gy/40 fx) and 24.3 Gy (IQR, 20.3-27.5; 45 Gy/30 fx) were associated with 21% and 18% ≥ grade 3 acute esophagitis, respectively. In the 60 Gy/40 fx group, a mean dose to the lungs of 16.5 Gy (IQR, 15.8-16.9), V20 Gy of 29.5% (IQR, 28.8-30.4), and V5 Gy of 65.6% (IQR, 61.5-68.7) led to ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in 4% of the patients. There was no ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in the 45 Gy/30 fx group. The treatment planning techniques, the percentage change in volumes between original and redelineated OARs, planning target volumes, relative doses, and laterality were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering the incidences of severe radiation-induced toxicities were within the range of other recent trials, the reported doses to the OARs appear to be safe. Treatment planning parameters were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups, supporting that the survival benefit of the twice-daily 60 Gy/40 fx TRT schedule was due to the higher dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开发一种基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的深度学习模型,以预测小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的总生存期(OS),并基于OS特征风险分层识别可从预防性颅脑照射(PCI)中受益的患者。
    方法:本研究包括来自三个医疗中心的556例SCLC患者。训练,内部验证,外部验证队列包括309、133和114名患者,分别。OS签名是使用统一的全连接神经网络构建的。开发了基于操作系统签名的深度学习模型。开发了临床模型和组合模型,并将其与深度学习模型进行了比较。此外,在使用OS签名进行分层后评估PCI的益处.
    结果:在内部和外部验证队列中,深度学习模型(一致性指数[C指数]0.745,0.733)在预测OS方面远远优于临床模型(C指数:0.635,0.630),但略差于组合模型(C指数:0.771,0.770)。此外,深度学习模型具有出色的校准,临床有用性,并提高了对生存结果分类的准确性。值得注意的是,高危患者在有限阶段和广泛阶段均可从PCI获得生存获益(均P<0.05),而在低风险患者中未观察到显著关联.
    结论:基于CT的深度学习模型在预测SCLC患者的OS方面表现出良好的性能。OS签名可以帮助个性化治疗计划以选择可能受益于PCI的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning model to predict overall survival (OS) among small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and identify patients who could benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) based on OS signature risk stratification.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively included 556 SCLC patients from three medical centers. The training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts comprised 309, 133, and 114 patients, respectively. The OS signature was built using a unified fully connected neural network. A deep learning model was developed based on the OS signature. Clinical and combined models were developed and compared with a deep learning model. Additionally, the benefits of PCI were evaluated after stratification using an OS signature.
    RESULTS: Within the internal and external validation cohorts, the deep learning model (concordance index [C-index] 0.745, 0.733) was far superior to the clinical model (C-index: 0.635, 0.630) in predicting OS, but slightly worse than the combined model (C-index: 0.771, 0.770). Additionally, the deep learning model had excellent calibration, clinical usefulness, and improved accuracy in classifying survival outcomes. Remarkably, patients at high risk had a survival benefit from PCI in both the limited and extensive stages (all P < 0.05), whereas no significant association was observed in patients at low risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: The CT-based deep learning model exhibited promising performance in predicting the OS of SCLC patients. The OS signature may aid in individualized treatment planning to select patients who may benefit from PCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    背景:KEYNOTE-011(NCT01840579)研究的E部分评估了派姆单抗联合铂-依托泊苷化疗在先前未治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)日本患者中的安全性和抗肿瘤活性。
    方法:患者每3周接受4个周期的pembrolizumab(200mg),与顺铂(75mg/m2)和依托泊苷(100mg/m2;第1、2、3天)联合使用队列1;卡铂(AUC5mg/mL/min)和依托泊苷(100mg/m2;第1、2天,第3天的依托泊联合治疗之后是pembrolizumab单药治疗(31个周期)。主要终点是安全性和耐受性(包括剂量限制性毒性;DLT)。
    结果:15例患者纳入研究(队列1,n=6;队列2,n=6;队列3,n=3)。从治疗分配到数据截止的中位时间为22.1个月(范围,4.1-32.4个月)。DLT发生在队列1中的3例患者中(1例4级喉部狭窄和3级发热性中性粒细胞减少症;2例3级发热性中性粒细胞减少症);队列2或3中没有患者经历DLT。≥3级治疗相关不良事件包括白细胞减少症(67%)和中性粒细胞减少症(87%)。在所有患者中,ORR为67%(95%CI,38%-88%),中位DOR为4.5个月(范围,2.8-28.8个月)。中位PFS为4.2个月(95%CI,3.0-7.8个月),中位OS为22.1个月(95%CI,7.4-25.9个月)。
    结论:Pembrolizumab联合铂-依托泊苷治疗具有可控的毒性,没有新的安全性信号,并且与日本ES-SCLC患者的抗肿瘤活性相关。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01840579。
    BACKGROUND: Part E of the KEYNOTE-011 (NCT01840579) study assessed the safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).
    METHODS: Patients received 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks in combination with cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 1; with carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 2; or with cisplatin/etoposide and pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg; cycle 1, day 4) in cohort 3. Combination therapy was followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy (31 cycles). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability (including dose-limiting toxicities; DLTs).
    RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the study (cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 6; cohort 3, n = 3). Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff was 22.1 months (range, 4.1‒32.4 months). DLTs occurred in 3 patients in cohort 1 (one patient with grade 4 laryngeal stenosis and grade 3 febrile neutropenia; two patients with grade 3 febrile neutropenia); no patients in cohorts 2 or 3 experienced DLTs. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (67%) and neutropenia (87%). Among all patients, ORR was 67% (95% CI, 38%‒88%) and median DOR was 4.5 months (range, 2.8‒28.8 months). Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0‒7.8 months) and median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 7.4‒25.9 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-etoposide therapy had manageable toxicity with no new safety signals and was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ES-SCLC.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01840579.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在某些类型的癌症中,治疗前自身抗体与免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗功效有关,其重要性尚未在SCLC患者中进行评估.
    一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究是对52例广泛性疾病SCLC患者进行的,这些患者在日本六个参与中心中的任何一个接受免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗作为一线治疗。收集预处理血清样品并分析自身抗体(类风湿因子,抗核抗体,和抗甲状腺)。此外,12抗神经元抗体(AMPH,CV2,PNMA2,Ri,哟,胡,Recoverin,SOX1,Titin,Zic4,GAD65和Tr)使用免疫印迹测定法进行分析。主要终点是有或没有自身抗体的irAE的发生率。次要终点是基于自身抗体存在或不存在的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
    PFS和OS分别为4.4和25.3个月,分别。自身抗体(类风湿因子,抗核抗体,和抗甲状腺抗体)在29例患者(56%)中检测到。总的来说,在18例患者中观察到irAE(35%);自身抗体阳性组的irAE发生率为48%,自身抗体阴性组的irAE发生率为17%(p=0.039)。有和没有自身抗体的患者之间的PFS或OS没有差异(4.4个月对4.6个月,p=0.36;15.3个月对18.2个月,p=0.36)。16例患者(31%)检测到了神经元抗体。然而,两组均未观察到神经系统irAE的发展。
    需要警惕治疗前抗体阳性患者中irAE的发展。
    UNASSIGNED: Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.
    UNASSIGNED: PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (p = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, p = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, p = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:SYHA1807是一种新的赖氨酸特异性脱甲基酶1抑制剂,正在开发用于治疗小细胞肺癌。目的:建立超高效液相色谱-质谱(UPLC-MS)/MS法测定人血浆中SYHA1807,支持其在首次人体研究中的应用。方法:在ACQUITYUPLCBEH®C18色谱柱上分离SYHA1807(2.1×50mm,1.7μm)在血浆样品的蛋白质沉淀后。使用XevoTQS三重四极杆质谱仪利用正电子喷雾电离源进行质谱分析。根据生物分析指南对所建立的方法进行了充分验证。结果与结论:快速,首次建立了特异性和稳健的UPLC-MS/MS方法来定量SYHA1807,并成功应用于首次人体研究。
    Background: SYHA1807 is a novel lysine specific demethylase 1 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Aim: This study aimed to establish a ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS)/MS method for measuring SYHA1807 in human plasma, supporting its application in a first-in-human study. Methods: SYHA1807 was separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH® C18 Column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) after protein precipitation of plasma samples. Mass spectrometry analysis was performed with a Xevo TQS triple quadrupole mass spectrometer utilizing a positive electronic spray ionization source. The established method was fully validated according to bioanalytical guidelines. Results & conclusion: A rapid, specific and robust UPLC-MS/MS method was first established for quantifying SYHA1807 and successfully applied in a first-in-human study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号