Self-harm

自我伤害
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在儿童和青少年中,自我伤害的思想和行为(SITB)正在急剧增加。危机支持旨在提供即时的精神保健,风险缓解,以及对经历SITB和急性心理健康困扰的人的干预。数字心理健康干预措施(DMHI)已成为面对面护理的可访问和有效替代方案;然而,大多数不为SITB的儿童和青少年提供危机支持或持续护理。
    目的:为出现SITB的儿童和青少年提供数字危机支持和精神卫生保健的发展,这项研究旨在(1)描述参与数字危机应对服务的SITB儿童和青少年的特征,(2)在整个护理过程中,比较患有SITB的儿童和青少年的焦虑和抑郁症状与没有SITB的儿童和青少年的焦虑和抑郁症状,和(3)建议未来的步骤,为提交SITB的儿童和青少年实施数字危机支持和精神保健。
    方法:这项回顾性研究使用儿童和青少年(1-17岁;N=2161)参与儿科协同护理DMHI的数据进行。在每个现场会议期间评估SITB患病率。对于在现场表演中展示SITB的儿童和青少年,一个快速的危机支持小组提供了基于证据的危机支持服务。大约每月完成一次评估以测量焦虑和抑郁症状的严重程度。人口统计,心理健康症状,并将出现SITB的儿童和青少年(有SITB的组)与没有SITB的儿童和青少年(没有SITB的组)的心理健康症状的变化进行了比较。
    结果:与没有SITB的组(1977/2161,91.49%)相比,SITB组(184/2161,8.51%)主要由青少年(107/184,58.2%)和女性儿童和青少年(118/184,64.1%)组成.在基线,与没有SITB的组相比,SITB组的焦虑和抑郁症状更严重.从DMHI的精神保健之前到之后,两组儿童和青少年焦虑症状改善率无差异(SITB组:54/70,77%vs无SITB组:367/440,83.4%;χ21=1.2;P=.32),抑郁症状改善率无差异(SITB组:58/72,81%vs无SITB组:255/313,81.5%;χ21=0;P=.99)。两组在使用DMHI治疗期间,焦虑(t80.20=1.37;P=.28)和抑郁(t83.75=-0.08;P=.99)症状的症状严重程度变化也没有差异。
    结论:这项研究表明,参与协同护理DMHI与经历SITB的儿童和青少年的心理健康结局改善有关。这些结果为儿童和青少年在危机支持和心理保健中使用儿童DMHIs提供了初步见解。从而解决儿童和青少年急性心理健康危机的公共卫生问题。
    BACKGROUND: Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are increasing dramatically among children and adolescents. Crisis support is intended to provide immediate mental health care, risk mitigation, and intervention for those experiencing SITBs and acute mental health distress. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have emerged as accessible and effective alternatives to in-person care; however, most do not provide crisis support or ongoing care for children and adolescents with SITBs.
    OBJECTIVE: To inform the development of digital crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs, this study aims to (1) characterize children and adolescents with SITBs who participate in a digital crisis response service, (2) compare anxiety and depressive symptoms of children and adolescents presenting with SITBs versus those without SITBs throughout care, and (3) suggest future steps for the implementation of digital crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data from children and adolescents (aged 1-17 y; N=2161) involved in a pediatric collaborative care DMHI. SITB prevalence was assessed during each live session. For children and adolescents who exhibited SITBs during live sessions, a rapid crisis support team provided evidence-based crisis support services. Assessments were completed approximately once a month to measure anxiety and depressive symptom severity. Demographics, mental health symptoms, and change in the mental health symptoms of children and adolescents presenting with SITBs (group with SITBs) were compared to those of children and adolescents with no SITBs (group without SITBs).
    RESULTS: Compared to the group without SITBs (1977/2161, 91.49%), the group with SITBs (184/2161, 8.51%) was mostly made up of adolescents (107/184, 58.2%) and female children and adolescents (118/184, 64.1%). At baseline, compared to the group without SITBs, the group with SITBs had more severe anxiety and depressive symptoms. From before to after mental health care with the DMHI, the 2 groups did not differ in the rate of children and adolescents with anxiety symptom improvement (group with SITBs: 54/70, 77% vs group without SITBs: 367/440, 83.4%; χ21=1.2; P=.32) as well as depressive symptom improvement (group with SITBs: 58/72, 81% vs group without SITBs: 255/313, 81.5%; χ21=0; P=.99). The 2 groups also did not differ in the amount of change in symptom severity during care with the DMHI for anxiety (t80.20=1.37; P=.28) and depressive (t83.75=-0.08; P=.99) symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that participation in a collaborative care DMHI is associated with improved mental health outcomes in children and adolescents experiencing SITBs. These results provide preliminary insights for the use of pediatric DMHIs in crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs, thereby addressing the public health issue of acute mental health crisis in children and adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探讨了入院时自杀危机综合症(SCS)的症状与自我伤害和出院后自杀死亡之间的关系。还探讨了临床医生对入院时住院患者的情绪反应与出院后自残和自杀死亡之间的关系。
    在入学的第一个24小时内,患者完成了SCS症状的自我报告测量,临床医生报告了他们对患者的情绪反应。随访数据来自挪威患者登记处和挪威死因登记处。
    出院后18个月内,347名患者中有44人(12.7%)自残,5名患者(1.4%)自杀死亡。入院时,与其他患者相比,后来自我伤害的患者报告了更高的SCS症状.临床医生报告了对自我伤害小组的负面情绪反应。在回归分析中,既往自杀行为和诊断为"情绪不稳定人格障碍"(EUPD;F60.3)与出院后自我伤害风险增加相关.
    结果表明,出院后自我伤害发作的患者与没有自我伤害的患者在入院期间SCS症状更强烈方面存在显着差异。临床医生的负面情绪反应可能与评估出院后自我伤害的风险有关。
    UNASSIGNED: This study explored the associations between symptoms of the Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS) at admission and self-harm and death by suicide post-discharge. The association between clinicians\' emotional responses toward inpatients at admission and post-discharge self-harm and suicide death was also explored.
    UNASSIGNED: Within the first 24-h of admission, patients completed a self-report measure of symptoms of SCS, and clinicians reported their emotional responses toward the patients. Follow-up data were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.
    UNASSIGNED: Within 18 months post-discharge, 44 (12.7%) out of 347 patients had self-harmed, and five patients (1.4%) had died by suicide. At admission, patients who later self-harmed reported higher symptoms of SCS compared to the other patients. Clinicians reported more negative emotional responses toward the self-harm group. In a regression analysis, previous suicidal behavior and a diagnosis of \"emotionally unstable personality disorder\" (EUPD; F60.3) were associated with increased risk of self-harm post-discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicated that patients with post-discharge episodes of self-harm are significantly different from patients who do not self-harm in terms of more intense symptoms of SCS during admission. Clinicians\' negative emotional responses may be relevant in the assessment of the risk of post-discharge self-harm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项回顾性队列研究探讨了COVID-19大流行对2015年1月至2021年7月新加坡国立大学医院小儿创伤病例的影响。大流行引发了前所未有的措施,改变社会动态。该研究假设在大流行期间重大创伤事件减少。
    方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,包括所有出现创伤相关ICD-9编码的儿科患者,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)大于8。将患者分为两个时间段:大流行前(2015年1月至2020年3月)和大流行(2020年4月至2021年7月)。
    结果:在254例小儿创伤病例中,201发生在大流行前,和53在大流行期间。虽然总体创伤发生率仍然相似,大流行时期的伤害模式发生了转变。家庭跌倒增加,车辆事故减少,而故意的自我伤害和照顾者虐待显著上升。在大流行期间,归因于非意外伤害的严重创伤的发生率增加。
    结论:这项研究揭示了创伤模式的变化,强调了解大流行期间社会影响的重要性。值得注意的是,故意自残和虐待照顾者的案件激增,呼应大流行期间其他研究中强调的全球关切。该研究强调,在未来的大流行期间,有必要先发制人地应对脆弱人群的生理和心理压力。
    OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric trauma cases in Singapore\'s National University Hospital from January 2015 to July 2021. The pandemic prompted unprecedented measures, altering societal dynamics. The study hypothesizes a reduction in major trauma incidents during the pandemic period.
    METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study including all pediatric patients presenting with trauma-related ICD-9 codes, and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 8. Patients were stratified into two time periods: pre-pandemic (January 2015 to March 2020) and pandemic (April 2020 to July 2021) periods.
    RESULTS: Out of 254 pediatric trauma cases, 201 occurred pre-pandemic, and 53 during the pandemic. While overall trauma incidence remained similar, the pandemic period saw a shift in injury patterns. Home-based falls increased, vehicular accidents decreased, while deliberate self-harm and caregiver abuse rose significantly. The incidence of serious trauma attributed to non-accidental injury increased during the pandemic.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals changing trauma patterns, emphasizing the importance of understanding societal impacts during pandemics. Notably cases of deliberate self-harm and caregiver abuse surged, echoing global concerns highlighted in other studies during the pandemic. The study underscores the need to preempt physical and psychological stressors in vulnerable populations during future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:先前关于肥胖手术(OS)的研究表明,患者不仅会减轻体重,而且还会改善某些心理健康结果(例如,抑郁症)。然而,操作系统后,自我伤害行为可能会增加。关于自我伤害,文献主要限于使用医院或急诊室图表数据的研究。这项纵向研究检查了OS前后的自我报告的自我伤害行为和潜在的精神病理学相关性。
    方法:手术前患者(N=220)在OS前和OS后大约六个月填写了一组问卷。使用自我伤害量表捕获了自我伤害行为。评估还包括测量抑郁症状的标准化仪器,焦虑,饮食失调,酒精使用,和自杀的想法。
    结果:在OS之前和之后的25.0%报告了任何自我伤害。OS前后自我伤害行为的数量或任何自我伤害的患病率均未发现差异。总的来说,11.4%的人在这两个时期都经历过自我伤害行为。一个子集仅在OS之前(13.2%)显示自我伤害行为,另一个子集仅在OS之后(13.6%)。这两组的大小大致相同。OS后,自我伤害行为与精神病理学表现出强烈的关联,尤其是抑郁和自杀意念.
    结论:OS出现后,自我伤害行为没有增加。尽管如此,一个亚组显示OS后的自我伤害行为与进一步的精神病理学密切相关。这反映了在OS护理之前和之后实施自我伤害筛查的必要性。需要更长的随访时间的进一步研究来延长这些发现。
    OBJECTIVE: Previous research on obesity surgery (OS) showed that patients do not only experience weight loss but also improvements in certain mental health outcomes (e.g., depression) after OS. However, self-harm behaviors might increase after OS. Regarding self-harm, the literature is mostly limited to studies using data from hospital or emergency room charts. This longitudinal study examined self-reported self-harm behaviors and potential psychopathological correlates before and after OS.
    METHODS: Pre-surgery patients (N = 220) filled out a set of questionnaires before and approximately six months after OS. Self-harm behaviors were captured with the Self-Harm Inventory. The assessments further included standardized instruments to measure symptoms of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, alcohol use, and suicidal ideations.
    RESULTS: Any self-harm was reported by 24.6% before and by 25.0% after OS. No differences in the number of self-harm behaviors or prevalence of any self-harm before and after OS were found. Overall, 11.4% experienced self-harm behaviors at both times. A subset showed self-harm behaviors only before (13.2%) OS and another subset only after OS (13.6%). These two groups were about the same size. Self-harm behaviors showed strong associations with psychopathology after OS, especially with depression and suicidal ideation.
    CONCLUSIONS: No increase in self-harm behaviors after OS emerged. Still, a subgroup showed self-harm behaviors after OS closely linked to further psychopathology. This mirrors the need to implement screening for self-harm before and after OS into OS care. Further studies with longer follow up periods are needed to extend these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    情节未来思考(EFT),想象未来自传事件的能力,是一个日常和临床重要的认知过程。专注于抑郁和自杀,在这里我们讨论将EFT与精神病理学联系起来的证据。想象中的未来事件的情绪效价已经成为迄今为止检测到的EFT最广泛的特征,积极的EFT与抑郁症状和自杀念头和行为相关。这种模式可能不仅仅是悲伤或快感缺失的副产品。未来研究的有希望的方向包括澄清EFT和临床结果之间的时间关联,调查积极EFT的潜在利弊,并完善对青年的评估,以在精神病理学发作之前或之后不久测量EFT。
    Episodic future thinking (EFT), the ability to imagine future autobiographical events, is both an everyday and clinically significant cognitive process. With a focus on depression and suicidality, here we discuss evidence connecting EFT with psychopathology. Emotional valence of imagined future events has emerged as the most widely established feature of EFT detected to date, with less positive EFT being associated with depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This pattern may not be merely a byproduct of sadness or anhedonia. Promising directions for future research include clarifying the temporal association between EFT and clinical outcomes, investigating the potential benefits and drawbacks of positive EFT, and refining assessments for youth to measure EFT either preceding or soon after onset of psychopathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于反复严重的自我伤害(SH)而导致的精神科住院,是一个研究不足的领域,但在卫生服务(HS)的挑战。最近的研究表明,严重人格障碍(PD)和复杂合并症患者的非自愿治疗水平很高。关注广泛住院的SH患者,本研究旨在调查患者和临床医生对HS和治疗联盟的评估。
    一项横断面研究,其中包括住院患者样本(年龄>18岁),去年因SH或SA而频繁(>5)或长期(>4周)精神病医院入院。从健康地区的12家医院招募(N=42)。评估包括患者和临床医生报告。
    少数患者(14%)在入院前对HS感到满意,45%(患者)和20%(临床医生)认为目前的入院有帮助,46%(患者)和14%(临床医生)担心出院。38%的案件收到治疗投诉。出院后有68%的门诊精神性HS,大多数临床医生表示在整个HS之间有令人满意的联系。更密集或更专业的形式是不寻常的(结构化门诊治疗35%,日治疗21%,门诊服务32%,计划住院服务31%)。相互的问题理解,目标,并且在住院期间对治疗师的信心有限(患者评分满意的相互问题理解:39%,住宿目标:50%,置信度:50%)。大多数患者和治疗师联盟的评级是一致的。
    这项研究强调了HS满意度差,患者-治疗师的一致性差,有限的治疗联盟和有限的结构化治疗随访,解决SH或中间支持性门诊/日间/住院服务。
    UNASSIGNED: Extensive psychiatric hospitalization due to repeated severe self-harm (SH), is a poorly researched area, but a challenge within health services (HS). Recent studies have demonstrated high levels of involuntary treatment among patients with severe personality disorder (PD) and complex comorbidity. Keeping focus on extensively hospitalized SH patients, this study aimed to investigate patients\' and clinicians\' evaluation of HS and treatment alliance.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study with an inpatient sample (age >18 years) with frequent (>5) or long (>4 weeks) psychiatric hospital admissions last year due to SH or SA recruited from 12 hospitals across health regions (N = 42). Evaluation included patient and clinician report.
    UNASSIGNED: A minority of the patients (14%) were satisfied with HS before the current admission, 45% (patients) and 20% (clinicians) found the current admission helpful, and 46% (patients) and 14% (clinicians) worried about discharge. Treatment complaints were received in 38% of the cases. Outpatient mental HS were available after discharge for 68% and a majority of clinicians indicated satisfactory contact across HS. More intensive or specialized formats were unusual (structured outpatient treatment 35%, day treatment 21%, ambulatory services 32%, planned inpatient services 31%). Mutual problem understanding, aims, and confidence in therapists during the hospital stay were limited (patient-rated satisfactory mutual problem understanding: 39%, aims of stay: 50%, confidence: 50%). Patient and therapist alliance-ratings were in concordance for the majority.
    UNASSIGNED: The study highlights poor HS satisfaction, poor patient-therapist coherence, limited treatment alliance and limited follow-up in structured treatments addressing SH or intermediary supportive ambulatory/day/inpatient services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    行为成瘾模型认为,重复的自杀行为可以作为管理压力和负面情绪状态的适应不良策略,类似于物质成瘾。这两种行为都涉及负面情绪,提供暂时的心理救济,并坚持,表明共同的神经生物学机制。这项研究探讨了主要中继器之间的心理测量学差异,偶尔尝试,非自杀囚犯。
    一项针对四所监狱的363名囚犯的多中心横断面调查评估了抑郁症,认知情绪调节,冲动,感知压力,终生非自杀性自伤和自杀未遂。
    轻度抑郁症,中度自杀意念,中等程度的冲动很常见,将近一半的参与者至少尝试过一次自杀。分层多元回归分析显示,过去反复的自杀行为会增加对未来自杀念头的易感性,在反复尝试者中,自杀尝试是一种适应不良的情绪调节策略。
    结果揭示了情绪失调的差异,冲动,以及被研究群体中的压力应对策略,强化自杀作为一种行为成瘾的观念。成瘾的方法有助于解释以前的尝试者和自我保护者对后来的自杀想法的敏感性,为惩教环境中量身定制的干预措施提供有价值的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: The behavioral addiction model posits that repetitive suicidal behaviors can serve as maladaptive strategies for managing stress and negative emotional states, akin to substance addiction. Both behaviors involve negative emotions, offer temporary psychological relief, and persist, indicating shared neurobiological mechanisms. This study explored psychometric differences among major repeaters, occasional attempters, and non-suicidal prisoners.
    UNASSIGNED: A multi-centre cross-sectional survey of 363 inmates across four prisons assessed depression, cognitive-emotional regulation, impulsivity, perceived stress, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts.
    UNASSIGNED: Mild depression, moderate suicidal ideation, and moderate impulsivity were common, with nearly half of the participants having attempted suicide at least once. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that repeated suicidal behavior in the past increases susceptibility to future suicidal thoughts, with suicide attempts serving as a maladaptive emotion regulation strategy among repeated attempters.
    UNASSIGNED: The results reveal differences in emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and stress coping strategies among the studied groups, reinforcing the idea of suicidality as a form of behavioral addiction. The addiction approach helps explain the sensitivity to later suicidal thoughts in former attempters and self-harmers, offering valuable insights for tailored interventions within correctional settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自杀是25-44岁男性死亡的主要原因,通常与成为父亲相吻合的年龄。这篇综述旨在综合围产期父亲自杀和自残观念流行的证据,产后和早期育儿期。
    搜索了五个数据库(PsycINFO,Medline,WebofScience,PubMed和Cochrane系统评论数据库),以确定2000年1月1日至2023年3月9日之间发表的论文。在纳入的研究中,进行了荟萃分析以估计自杀和自残观念的患病率。进行亚组和敏感性分析以探索异质性的潜在来源。
    共确定了4215篇文章,14项研究纳入审查。自杀和自残观念的合并患病率为4.2%(95%CI[2.6%,6.2%])。自残观念的患病率估计值更高,为5.1%(95%CI[2.6%,6.2%])比3%的自杀率(95%CI[0.9%,6.1%])。
    这项审查发现,相当比例的父亲在养育子女的早期经历过自杀和自残的想法。然而,缺乏严格的患病率研究表明,迫切需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Suicide is a leading cause of death in males aged 25-44 years, an age which often coincides with becoming a father. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the prevalence of suicidal and self-harm ideation in fathers during the perinatal, postnatal and early parenting period.
    UNASSIGNED: Five databases were searched (PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) to identify papers published between 1 January 2000 and 9 March 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of suicidality and self-harm ideation across the included studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4215 articles were identified, with 14 studies included in the review. The combined pooled prevalence of suicidal and self-harm ideation was 4.2% (95% CI [2.6%, 6.2%]). Prevalence estimates were higher for self-harm ideation at 5.1% (95% CI [2.6%, 6.2%]) than for suicidality at 3% (95% CI [0.9%, 6.1%]).
    UNASSIGNED: This review found that a considerable proportion of fathers experience suicidal and self-harm ideation during the early years of parenting. However, the paucity of rigorous prevalence studies indicates that further research in this area is needed urgently.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对大学生自我伤害和心理健康状况增加的担忧可能反映出接受高等教育的机会不断扩大,与此设置相关的现有人口趋势和/或压力源。
    目的:比较人口水平的自我伤害数据,大学生与非大学生之间的神经发育和心理健康状况在入学前和入学期间具有相似特征。
    方法:这项队列研究将2012-2018年高等教育统计局的电子记录与初级和中级医疗记录联系起来。学生是大学入学时年龄在18至24岁之间的本科生。根据等效的年龄分布伪随机选择非学生。逻辑回归用于计算比值比。使用泊松回归计算发病率比率(IRR)。
    结果:该研究包括96760名学生和151795名非学生。作为男性,大学入学前记录的自我伤害和心理健康状况,更高的剥夺水平,导致成为学生的几率较低,而从大学辍学的几率较高。自我伤害的IRR,抑郁症,焦虑,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),学生的药物使用和精神分裂症较低。自我伤害的IRR,抑郁症,注意缺陷多动障碍,ASD,随着时间的推移,学生的酒精使用和精神分裂症的增加多于非学生。年龄较大的学生经历了更大的自我伤害和心理健康状况的风险,而年龄较小的学生比非学生更容易饮酒.
    结论:学生的心理健康状况是普遍和多样的。在大学期间,学生需要以人为本的阶梯式护理,与当地第三部门和医疗保健服务整合,以解决具体情况。
    BACKGROUND: Concern that self-harm and mental health conditions are increasing in university students may reflect widening access to higher education, existing population trends and/or stressors associated with this setting.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare population-level data on self-harm, neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions between university students and non-students with similar characteristics before and during enrolment.
    METHODS: This cohort study linked electronic records from the Higher Education Statistics Agency for 2012-2018 to primary and secondary healthcare records. Students were undergraduates aged 18 to 24 years at university entry. Non-students were pseudo-randomly selected based on an equivalent age distribution. Logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios. Poisson regressions were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR).
    RESULTS: The study included 96 760 students and 151 795 non-students. Being male, self-harm and mental health conditions recorded before university entry, and higher deprivation levels, resulted in lower odds of becoming a student and higher odds of drop-out from university. IRRs for self-harm, depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), drug use and schizophrenia were lower for students. IRRs for self-harm, depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, ASD, alcohol use and schizophrenia increased more in students than in non-students over time. Older students experienced greater risk of self-harm and mental health conditions, whereas younger students were more at risk of alcohol use than non-student counterparts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mental health conditions in students are common and diverse. While at university, students require person-centred stepped care, integrated with local third-sector and healthcare services to address specific conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神病住院患者中自杀和自残事件升高。在这项研究中,从居住在中国的183名患者(97名民事和86名法医)的医疗记录中回顾性收集了健康数据,或者被录取了,萨斯喀彻温省的一家公立精神病医院,加拿大从2021年4月1日至12月31日.进行了描述性和推断性分析,以估计(非致命)自杀和自我伤害事件的患病率和相关性,包括最近和一生的事件,根据患者的健康信息。近三分之二(62%)的患者有任何非致命自杀或自残事件的记录,包括一生的自我伤害史(42%)和自杀行为(37%)以及最近的自我伤害(24%)和自杀想法或行为(31%)。法医患者更有可能有自杀和自我伤害事件的记录。这项研究强调需要进一步研究精神病住院患者的自杀和自我伤害过程。
    Suicide and self-harm events are elevated in psychiatric inpatient populations. In this study, health data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of 183 patients (97 civil and 86 forensic) who had resided in, or been admitted to, a public psychiatric hospital in Saskatchewan, Canada from April 1 to December 31, 2021. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to estimate prevalence and correlates of (non-fatal) suicide and self-harm events, including recent and lifetime occurrences, according to patients\' health information. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of patients had any record of non-fatal suicide or self-harm events, including a lifetime history of self-harm (42%) and suicidal behavior (37%) as well as recent self-harm (24%) and suicidal (31%) thoughts or behaviors. Forensic patients were significantly more likely to have a record of suicide and self-harm events. This study emphasizes the need for further research into the course of suicidality and self-harm in psychiatric inpatients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号