Self-harm

自我伤害
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介由于精神健康障碍的患病率增加,在美国,急诊科(ED)用于管理精神病紧急情况的利用率显着增加。这项研究使用来自全国急诊科样本(NEDS)的数据,调查了针对精神病紧急情况的ED就诊的全国病例量和性别差异。方法这项回顾性分析包括使用相关国际疾病分类确定的成人ED就诊,第十次修订(ICD-10)代码。主要终点包括按性别分列的全国病例量。年龄<18岁的住院患者和性别数据缺失的患者被排除在外。次要终点包括住院死亡率,ED和住院费用,录取率,放电处理,停留时间(LOS)和程序的数量。结果2021年,美国约有1.435亿例ED访问,其中7,978,490用于精神病紧急情况。最常见的表现是药物滥用和中毒(5,119,086(64.2%)),严重的双相情感障碍(1,912,670(24%)),和焦虑或恐慌症发作(1,015,486(12.7%))。大约3,997,223(50.1%)是女性,男性为3981267人(49.9%)。男性年龄较大(平均年龄:45岁对43岁;P<0.001),更有可能没有保险(712,647(17.9%)对497,658(12.5%);P<0.001),Charlson合并症指数(CCI)较高(CCI≥2:792,272(19.9%)对643,552(16.1%);P<0.001)。接受急性药物滥用或中毒的男性多于女性(3,196,945(80.3%)与1,922,142(48.1%)),伴有或不伴有精神病的双相情感障碍(958,275(24.1%)与954,395(23.9%);P<0.001),和自杀意念(267,638(6.7%)对208,989(5.2%);P<0.001)。患有严重抑郁症的女性多于男性(455,683(11.4%)与441,921(11.1%)),焦虑和惊恐发作(615,572(15.4%)对402,108(10.1%)),急性应激反应(35,975(0.9%)与23,888(0.6%)),饮食失调(3,997(0.1%)与27,869(0.07%)),滥用史(21,164(0.53%)对19,569(0.49%);P<0.001)。妇女的死亡率较低(27,980(0.7%)对63,956(1.6%);P<0.001),较低的平均ED成本(调整后平均差(AMD):1189美元;P<0.001),住院人数较少(1,211,158(30.3%)与1,453,162(36.5%);P<0.001),与男性相比,长期住院的人数更高(1,442,998(36.1%)与1,194,380(30%);P<0.001)。结论这项研究强调了在精神病紧急情况下ED利用方面的显着性别差异。男性更常出现药物滥用和严重合并症,导致更高的医疗成本和住院。女人,虽然更有可能出现焦虑和抑郁障碍,产生更低的成本和更好的整体结果。
    Introduction The utilization of emergency departments (EDs) for managing psychiatric emergencies has significantly increased in the United States because of the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders. This study examined national case volumes and sex disparities in ED visits for psychiatric emergencies using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Methods This retrospective analysis included adult ED visits for psychiatric emergencies identified using relevant International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Primary endpoints included national case volumes by sex. Hospitalizations with age < 18 years and those with missing data on sex were excluded. Secondary endpoints included inpatient mortality, ED and inpatient costs, admission rates, discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and number of procedures. Results In 2021, there were approximately 143.5 million ED visits in the United States, with 7,978,490 of these being for psychiatric emergencies. The most common presentations were substance abuse and intoxication (5,119,086 (64.2%)), severe bipolar disorder (1,912,670 (24%)), and anxiety or panic attacks (1,015,486 (12.7%)). Approximately 3,997,223 (50.1%) were women, and 3,981,267 (49.9%) were men. Men were older (mean age: 45 versus 43 years; P<0.001), were more likely to be uninsured (712,647 (17.9%) versus 497,658 (12.5%); P<0.001), and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (CCI ≥ 2: 792,272 (19.9%) versus 643,552 (16.1%); P<0.001). More men than women presented to the ED with acute substance abuse or intoxication (3,196,945 (80.3%) versus 1,922,142 (48.1%)), bipolar disorder with or without psychosis (958,275 (24.1%) versus 954,395 (23.9%); P<0.001), and suicidal ideation (267,638 (6.7%) versus 208,989 (5.2%); P<0.001). More women than men presented with severe depression (455,683 (11.4%) versus 441,921 (11.1%)), anxiety and panic attacks (615,572 (15.4%) versus 402,108 (10.1%)), acute stress reaction (35,975 (0.9%) versus 23,888 (0.6%)), eating disorders (3,997 (0.1%) versus 27,869 (0.07%)), and a history of abuse (21,164 (0.53%) versus 19,569 (0.49%); P<0.001). Women had lower mortality rates (27,980 (0.7%) versus 63,956 (1.6%); P<0.001), lower mean ED costs (adjusted mean difference (AMD): $1,189; P<0.001), fewer in-hospital admissions (1,211,158 (30.3%) versus 1,453,162 (36.5%); P<0.001), and a higher number of prolonged hospitalizations (1,442,998 (36.1%) versus 1,194,380 (30%); P<0.001) compared with men. Conclusion This study highlights significant sex disparities in ED utilization for psychiatric emergencies. Men more frequently present with substance abuse and severe comorbidities, leading to higher healthcare costs and inpatient admissions. Women, while more likely to present with anxiety and depressive disorders, incur lower costs and have better overall outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是从系统评价中总结证据,范围审查,和荟萃分析,评估任何基于互联网的格式的影响,mobile-,或基于电话的干预作为基于技术的自杀预防干预。
    这是一篇综述,遵循2020年系统审查和荟萃分析声明指南的首选报告项目。2022年9月29日进行了电子搜索。由审阅者提取数据,然后通过评估系统评论的测量工具2评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。通过STATA版本17进行统计分析。从这些研究和随机效应模型中提取标准平均差,计算总合并效应大小(ES).I2统计量用于评估研究之间的异质性。对于出版偏见,使用了Egger测试。
    我们的研究中包含了六项评论,质量适中。总体样本量为24631。研究的标准平均差异的ES计算为-0.20,置信区间为(-0.26,-0.14)。异质性为58.14%,表明是中等到实质性的。Egger测试表明了出版偏见。
    我们的结果表明,基于技术的干预措施是有效的。我们建议使用不同对照组进行更严格的随机对照试验,以评估这些干预措施的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective is to summarize evidence from systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating the effects of any format of Internet-based, mobile-, or telephone-based intervention as a technology-based intervention in suicide prevention.
    UNASSIGNED: This is an umbrella review, that followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement guidelines. An electronic search was done on September 29, 2022. Data were extracted by reviewers and then methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2. Statistical analysis was done by STATA version 17. Standard mean difference was extracted from these studies and by random effect model, the overall pooled effect size (ES) was calculated. I2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity between studies. For publication bias, the Egger test was used.
    UNASSIGNED: Six reviews were included in our study, all with moderate quality. The overall sample size was 24631. The ES for standard mean differences of the studies is calculated as - 0.20 with a confidence interval of (-0.26, -0.14). The heterogeneity is found as 58.14%, indicating a moderate-to-substantial one. The Egger test shows publication bias.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results show that technology-based interventions are effective. We propose more rigorous randomized controlled trials with different control groups to assess the effectiveness of these interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探讨了10-18岁社区居住青少年的抑郁症状与自杀之间的关系。检查自尊,躯体症状,自我伤害调解了这种关系。利用2021年在韩国进行的全国青少年心理健康调查中的现有数据集,使用几种标准化的自我管理工具收集数据:韩国版本的Rosenberg自尊量表,韩国儿童躯体化量表,韩国版的自我伤害清单,抑郁症的心理健康筛查,和心理健康筛查自杀风险。构建并验证了路径模型,然后进行路径分析以评估效果。数据来自6689名青少年,包括5937名学生和752名失学青少年,发现18.7%的人在自杀群体中,11.8%有抑郁症状,57.9%表现为躯体症状,27.4%的人从事自我伤害。抑郁症状对自杀倾向有正向直接影响(β=0.166,p<0.001,95%置信区间=0.159-0.172)。自举测试表明,自尊有统计学上显著的间接影响,躯体症状,和自我伤害对抑郁症状与自杀性之间的关系(β=0.021,95%置信区间=0.013-0.029)。我们的研究结果表明,自尊,躯体症状,自我伤害调节抑郁症状和自杀之间的关系,建议采用针对这些因素的全面心理健康管理策略.
    This study explored the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidality among community-dwelling adolescents aged 10-18 years, examining whether self-esteem, somatic symptoms, and self-harm mediate this relationship. Utilizing a pre-existing dataset from a nationwide adolescent mental health survey conducted in Korea in 2021, data were collected using several standardized self-administered instruments: the Korean version of Rosenberg\'s self-esteem scale, Korean Children\'s Somatization Inventory, Korean version of the Self-Harm Inventory, Mental Health Screening for Depressive Disorders, and Mental Health Screening for Suicide Risk. A path model was constructed and validated, followed by path analysis to assess the effects. Data from 6689 adolescents, including 5937 students and 752 out-of-school adolescents, revealed that 18.7% were in the suicidality group, 11.8% experienced depressive symptoms, 57.9% exhibited somatic symptoms, and 27.4% engaged in self-harm. Depressive symptoms had a positive direct effect on suicidality (β = 0.166, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.159-0.172). Bootstrapping tests showed a statistically significant indirect effect of self-esteem, somatic symptoms, and self-harm on the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidality (β = 0.021, 95% confidence interval = 0.013-0.029). Our findings suggest that self-esteem, somatic symptoms, and self-harm mediate the relationship between depressive symptoms and suicidality, and comprehensive mental health management strategies addressing these factors are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究人员一直致力于确定可能减轻与网络欺凌受害相关的负面影响的因素。受到相当关注的一个重要因素是父母和朋友的社会支持及其降低网络欺凌受害风险和相关负面心理健康问题的潜力。然而,父母和朋友的感知社会支持对网络欺凌受害之间纵向关系的缓冲作用,抑郁症,主观健康投诉,对自我伤害的探索较少,特别是在跨文化背景下。为了解决这个差距,本研究检查了父母和朋友的感知社会支持在缓解抑郁中的作用,主观健康投诉,和自我伤害,一年后测量,与463名中国人(49%女性)和445名美国人(52%女性)八年级学生(13-15岁)中的网络欺凌受害有关。他们完成了关于网络欺凌受害的自我报告问卷,父母和朋友的社会支持,和心理健康(即,抑郁症,主观健康投诉,自我伤害)。一年后,他们完成了同样的心理健康问卷。调查结果显示,父母的感知支持报告没有差异,但与中国青少年相比,来自美国青少年的朋友社会支持的报道更多。来自父母的高水平的感知社会支持与网络欺凌受害之间的更强的负面关系相关,抑郁症,主观健康投诉,以及对中国和美国青少年的自我伤害,这些影响对中国青少年来说更加明显,而美国青少年和朋友的社会支持则相反。这些结果将在文化价值观以及这些价值观如何塑造成年人在青少年生活中的作用的背景下进行讨论。
    Researchers have focused on identifying factors that may mitigate the negative consequences associated with cyberbullying victimization. A significant factor that has received considerable attention is perceived social support from parents and friends and its potential to reduce the risk of cyberbullying victimization and the associated negative mental health issues. However, the buffering effects of perceived social support from parents and friends on the longitudinal relationships among cyberbullying victimization, depression, subjective health complaints, and self-harm have been less explored, particularly in cross-cultural contexts. To address this gap, the present study examined the role of perceived social support from parents and friends in buffering against depression, subjective health complaints, and self-harm, measured one year later, associated with cyberbullying victimization among 463 Chinese (49% female) and 445 American (52% female) eighth graders (ages 13-15). They completed self-report questionnaires on cyberbullying victimization, perceived social support from parents and friends, and mental health (i.e., depression, subjective health complaints, self-harm). One year later, they completed the same mental health questionnaires. The findings revealed no differences in reports of perceived support from parents, but greater reports of social support from friends for American adolescents when compared to Chinese adolescents. High levels of perceived social support from parents were associated with a stronger negative relationship between cyberbullying victimization, depression, subjective health complaints, and self-harm for both Chinese and American adolescents, with these effects being more pronounced for Chinese adolescents, while opposite patterns were found for American adolescents and perceived social support from friends. These results are discussed in the context of cultural values and how these values shape the role of adults in adolescents\' lives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行与全国自杀行为的增加无关,区域,或县级。然而,以前的研究没有在更精细的范围内进行,也没有对生态因素进行调整。
    我们的目标是评估自我伤害与COVID-19住院之间的精细时空关联,同时考虑生态因素。
    使用法国国家医院出院数据库,我们提取了法国大都市10岁以上(2019年至2021年)或COVID-19(2020年至2021年)患者因自我伤害住院的数据.我们首先使用Besag计算了2020年3月至2021年12月期间COVID-19的每月标准化发病率(SIR),约克,和Mollié时空模型。接下来,我们将SIR纳入生态回归,以检验因自残入院和因COVID-19入院之间的关联.最后,我们对生态变量进行了调整,滞后时间为0到6个月。
    与平滑的SIR≤1相比,COVID-19住院的SIR从1到3,从3到4以及大于4的平滑的SIR与随后的自我伤害住院人数增加有关,有2到4个月的时滞,4个月,6个月,分别。
    COVID-19入院的高SIR是在疫情高峰后几个月因自残入院的危险因素。这一发现强调了监测和寻求预防流行高峰期以外的自杀企图的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has not been associated with increases in suicidal behavior at the national, regional, or county level. However, previous studies were not conducted on a finer scale or adjusted for ecological factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Our objective was to assess the fine-scale spatiotemporal association between self-harm and COVID-19 hospitalizations, while considering ecological factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the French national hospital discharge database, we extracted data on hospitalizations for self-harm of patients older than 10 years (from 2019 to 2021) or for COVID-19 (from 2020 to 2021) in metropolitan France. We first calculated monthly standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021, using a Besag, York, and Mollié spatiotemporal model. Next, we entered the SIRs into an ecological regression in order to test the association between hospital admissions for self-harm and those for COVID-19. Lastly, we adjusted for ecological variables with time lags of 0 to 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with a smoothed SIR of ≤1, smoothed SIRs from 1 to 3, from 3 to 4, and greater than 4 for COVID-19 hospital admissions were associated with a subsequent increase in hospital admissions for self-harm, with a time lag of 2 to 4 months, 4 months, and 6 months, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: A high SIR for hospital admissions for COVID-19 was a risk factor for hospital admission for self-harm some months after the epidemic peaks. This finding emphasizes the importance of monitoring and seeking to prevent suicide attempts outside the epidemic peak periods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:自我伤害是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,反复的自我伤害在发作后的住院患者中很常见。证据表明心理干预可以帮助自我伤害的人,但很少有明确的研究对其临床和成本效益进行评估.反复的自我伤害与生活质量差有关,抑郁症,自杀和医疗服务费用的增加,证明了为反复自我伤害的人量身定制的心理治疗干预措施的发展。
    方法:FReSHSTART是一项多中心1:1随机对照试验,评估标准护理加心理治疗或仅标准护理对在急诊科(ED)反复自我伤害的成年人(≥18岁)的临床和成本效益。招募630名参与者,它包括一个内部飞行员,经济评价和过程评价。干预措施将由在急性环境中工作的精神卫生工作人员提供,具有评估和管理自我伤害紧急服务人员风险的经验。工作人员将接受培训和监督,以提供三种特别适应的疗法之一:心理动力人际关系疗法,认知行为疗法或接受和承诺疗法。分配到干预措施的参与者将根据治疗师分配接受一种适应性疗法,为期6个月,每周12次,一对一,45-50分钟的会议。主要结果是在随机化后12个月通过常规评估结果测量中的临床结果测量的生活质量。次要结果包括自杀意图,抑郁和成本效益。在随机分组后6个月和12个月,使用医院出诊记录和在线/邮政/电话问卷收集数据。在3个月和9个月时额外收集资源使用情况。
    结论:该方案概述了一项随机对照试验,以研究改良疗法是否具有成本效益并改善反复自我伤害患者的生活质量。对于该人群,NHS中很少有干预措施被证明是可交付的。这项研究得到了经验丰富的心理卫生工作者作为治疗师管理风险的参与。
    背景:于2021年8月3日注册。IRAS编号:297939。ISRCTN:https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN73357210。REC参考:21/EE/0145。
    背景:利兹大学.
    BACKGROUND: Self-harm is a major public health challenge, and repeated self-harm is common in those attending hospital following an episode. Evidence suggests psychological interventions could help people who self-harm, but few definitive studies have assessed their clinical and cost-effectiveness. Repeated self-harm is associated with poor quality of life, depression, suicide and increased health service costs which justify the development of psychotherapeutic interventions tailored for people with repeated self-harm.
    METHODS: FReSH START is a multicentre individually 1:1 randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of standard care plus psychological therapy or standard care alone for adults (≥ 18 years) presenting at an emergency department (ED) with repeated self-harm. Recruiting 630 participants, it includes an internal pilot, economic evaluation and process evaluation. The intervention will be delivered by mental health staff working in acute settings, with experience of assessing and managing risk in people presenting to emergency services with self-harm. Staff will be trained and supervised to deliver one of three specially adapted therapies: psychodynamic interpersonal therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy or acceptance and commitment therapy. Participants allocated to the intervention will receive one of the adapted therapies according to therapist allocation for up to 6 months via 12 weekly, one to one, 45-50-min sessions. The primary outcome is quality of life measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure at 12 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes include suicidal intent, depression and cost-effectiveness. Data are collected using hospital attendance records and online/postal/telephone questionnaires at 6 and 12 months post-randomisation, with resource use additionally collected at 3 and 9 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: This protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial to investigate whether modified therapies are cost-effective and improve quality of life for people who repeatedly self-harm. Few interventions are proven to be deliverable in the NHS for this population. This study is strengthened by the involvement of qualified mental health workers experienced in managing risk as therapists.
    BACKGROUND: Registered on August 03, 2021. IRAS number: 297939. ISRCTN: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN73357210 . REC reference: 21/EE/0145.
    BACKGROUND: University of Leeds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的青少年自我伤害的风险增加。表现出ADHD症状水平升高的青少年自我伤害的风险,但没有正式的诊断,没有得到很好的研究和理解。
    目的:在一个以人群为基础的青少年样本中,调查自述多动症症状与自我伤害之间的关系。
    方法:邀请基于人群的青年@hordaland研究中的青少年完成成人ADHD自我报告量表(ASRS)和短情绪和情感问卷(SMFQ)。他们被问及是否故意服用过量或故意伤害自己,一次或多次,根据欧洲儿童和青少年自我伤害(CASE)研究中使用的代码定义。在ASRS-v1.1筛选器上报告六个选定项目中的至少四个存在严重问题的青少年被定义为ADHD-screen阳性(ADHD-SC),其余样品为ADHD-screen阴性(ADHD-SC-)。SMFQ评分≥12用于定义高水平的抑郁症状。
    结果:共有9692名青少年(平均年龄17.4岁,53.1%的女性)参加了这项研究,其中2390人(24.7%)在ASRS上呈阳性。ADHD-SC+青少年比ADHD-SC-组更频繁地进行自我伤害(14.6%vs.5.4%,OR=3.02,95CI[2.57-3.24])。在调整人口变量后,这仍然很重要,SMFQ评分≥12分,品行障碍症状以及自残和自杀未遂的家族病史(OR=1.58,95CI[1.31-1.89])。他们也更有可能报告过量作为他们的自我伤害方法(OR=1.52,95CI[1.05-2.23])。在ADHD-SC+组女性中,高水平的注意力不集中和多动/冲动症状,SMFQ评分≥12,表明行为障碍的症状以及自残和自杀未遂的家族史增加了故意自残的可能性。
    结论:ADHD筛查阳性的青少年参与自我伤害的风险增加。临床医生应该考虑在出现高水平ADHD症状的青少年中这种参与的风险增加,即使没有临床ADHD诊断。
    BACKGROUND: Adolescents with attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have an increased risk of self-harm. The risk of self-harm among adolescents who display an elevated level of ADHD symptoms, but without a formal diagnosis, is not well-studied and understood.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between self-reported symptoms of ADHD and self-harm in a population-based sample of adolescents.
    METHODS: Adolescents in the population-based youth@hordaland study were invited to complete the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) and the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ). They were asked whether they ever deliberately have taken an overdose or tried to harm themselves on purpose, once or multiple times, defined according to the code used in the Child and Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study. Adolescents reporting severe problems on ≥ four of six selected items on the ASRS-v 1.1 screener were defined as ADHD-screen positive (ADHD-SC+), and the remaining sample as ADHD-screen negative (ADHD-SC-). SMFQ score ≥ 12 was used to define a high level of depressive symptoms.
    RESULTS: A total of 9692 adolescents (mean age 17.4 years, 53.1% females) participated in the study, of which 2390 (24.7%) screened positive on the ASRS. ADHD-SC+ adolescents engaged in self-harm more often than the ADHD-SC- group (14.6% vs. 5.4%, OR = 3.02, 95%CI [2.57-3.24]). This remained significant after adjustment for demographic variables, SMFQ score ≥ 12, symptoms of conduct disorder and familial history of self-harm and suicide attempts (OR = 1.58, 95%CI [1.31-1.89]). They were also more likely to report an overdose as their method of self-harm (OR = 1.52, 95%CI [1.05-2.23]). Within the ADHD-SC+ group female sex, high levels of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, SMFQ score ≥ 12, symptoms indicating conduct disorder and familial history of self-harm and suicide attempts increased the likelihood of engaging in deliberate self-harm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who screened positive for ADHD had increased risk of engaging in self-harm. Clinicians should consider the increased risk of such engagement in adolescents who present with high level of ADHD symptoms, even in the absence of a clinical ADHD diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精使用障碍(AUD)与自杀行为有关,但缺乏前瞻性临床研究。
    比较有自残和无自残AUD患者的临床特征和6个月结局。
    804名成年人(平均年龄33岁,年龄范围18-95岁,541名女性和263名男性,在瑞典的三家大学医院中,有666例自杀未遂和138例非自杀性自我伤害)参加了一项研究采访,其中包括迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI)。通过记录审查确定了六个月内随后的非致命自杀行为;自杀由国家登记册确定。
    在索引处,39%的男性和29%的女性有AUD。这些病例中超过三分之二(69%)是由MINI确定的,但不是通过临床AUD诊断。尽管有AUD的人比没有AUD的人更常见(56%vs36%,Padj=<.001),每组一半的参与者注意到与指数尝试相关的冲动性(48%vs52%,Padj=1)。随后的自杀行为(致命/非致命)发生在67名AUD(26%)和98名没有AUD(18%),AUD患者的风险高出60%(OR=1.60,95%[CI1.13-2.28],P=.009)。在6个月内,有4名AUD(2%)和6名无AUD(1%)的人死于自杀。
    近三分之一的患者在自我伤害后出现在精神科急诊,符合AUD标准,但是临床医生经常错过这个诊断。AUD患者随后自杀行为的风险升高。提高对酒精使用障碍的认识的教育干预措施可能有助于临床医生对存在自我伤害的患者进行评估和管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with suicidal behavior, but prospective clinical studies are lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare clinical characteristics and 6-month outcomes in persons with and without AUD who self-harm.
    UNASSIGNED: 804 adults (mean age 33, age range 18-95, 541 women and 263 men, 666 with suicide attempts and 138 with non-suicidal self-injuries at index) at three Swedish university hospitals took part in a research interview that included the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Subsequent non-fatal suicidal behavior within six months was identified by record review; suicides were identified by national register.
    UNASSIGNED: At index, 39% of the men and 29% of the women had AUD. Over two thirds of these cases (69%) were identified by the MINI, but not by clinical AUD diagnosis. While trait impulsivity was more common among persons with AUD than those without (56% vs 36%, P adj = <.001), impulsivity in connection with the index attempt was noted in half of the participants in each group (48% vs 52%, P adj = 1). Subsequent suicidal behavior (fatal/non-fatal) occurred in 67 persons with AUD (26%) and in 98 without AUD (18%), a 60% higher risk among persons with AUD (OR = 1.60, 95% [CI 1.13-2.28], P = .009). Four persons with AUD (2%) and six without (1%) died by suicide within 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Almost a third of patients presenting at psychiatric emergency settings after self-harm fulfilled criteria for AUD, but clinicians often missed this diagnosis. Risk for subsequent suicidal behavior was elevated in patients with AUD. Educational interventions to improve recognition of alcohol use disorder may aid clinicians in the assessment and management of patients who present with self-harm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在儿童和青少年中,自我伤害的思想和行为(SITB)正在急剧增加。危机支持旨在提供即时的精神保健,风险缓解,以及对经历SITB和急性心理健康困扰的人的干预。数字心理健康干预措施(DMHI)已成为面对面护理的可访问和有效替代方案;然而,大多数不为SITB的儿童和青少年提供危机支持或持续护理。
    目的:为出现SITB的儿童和青少年提供数字危机支持和精神卫生保健的发展,这项研究旨在(1)描述参与数字危机应对服务的SITB儿童和青少年的特征,(2)在整个护理过程中,比较患有SITB的儿童和青少年的焦虑和抑郁症状与没有SITB的儿童和青少年的焦虑和抑郁症状,和(3)建议未来的步骤,为提交SITB的儿童和青少年实施数字危机支持和精神保健。
    方法:这项回顾性研究使用儿童和青少年(1-17岁;N=2161)参与儿科协同护理DMHI的数据进行。在每个现场会议期间评估SITB患病率。对于在现场表演中展示SITB的儿童和青少年,一个快速的危机支持小组提供了基于证据的危机支持服务。大约每月完成一次评估以测量焦虑和抑郁症状的严重程度。人口统计,心理健康症状,并将出现SITB的儿童和青少年(有SITB的组)与没有SITB的儿童和青少年(没有SITB的组)的心理健康症状的变化进行了比较。
    结果:与没有SITB的组(1977/2161,91.49%)相比,SITB组(184/2161,8.51%)主要由青少年(107/184,58.2%)和女性儿童和青少年(118/184,64.1%)组成.在基线,与没有SITB的组相比,SITB组的焦虑和抑郁症状更严重.从DMHI的精神保健之前到之后,两组儿童和青少年焦虑症状改善率无差异(SITB组:54/70,77%vs无SITB组:367/440,83.4%;χ21=1.2;P=.32),抑郁症状改善率无差异(SITB组:58/72,81%vs无SITB组:255/313,81.5%;χ21=0;P=.99)。两组在使用DMHI治疗期间,焦虑(t80.20=1.37;P=.28)和抑郁(t83.75=-0.08;P=.99)症状的症状严重程度变化也没有差异。
    结论:这项研究表明,参与协同护理DMHI与经历SITB的儿童和青少年的心理健康结局改善有关。这些结果为儿童和青少年在危机支持和心理保健中使用儿童DMHIs提供了初步见解。从而解决儿童和青少年急性心理健康危机的公共卫生问题。
    BACKGROUND: Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are increasing dramatically among children and adolescents. Crisis support is intended to provide immediate mental health care, risk mitigation, and intervention for those experiencing SITBs and acute mental health distress. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have emerged as accessible and effective alternatives to in-person care; however, most do not provide crisis support or ongoing care for children and adolescents with SITBs.
    OBJECTIVE: To inform the development of digital crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs, this study aims to (1) characterize children and adolescents with SITBs who participate in a digital crisis response service, (2) compare anxiety and depressive symptoms of children and adolescents presenting with SITBs versus those without SITBs throughout care, and (3) suggest future steps for the implementation of digital crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data from children and adolescents (aged 1-17 y; N=2161) involved in a pediatric collaborative care DMHI. SITB prevalence was assessed during each live session. For children and adolescents who exhibited SITBs during live sessions, a rapid crisis support team provided evidence-based crisis support services. Assessments were completed approximately once a month to measure anxiety and depressive symptom severity. Demographics, mental health symptoms, and change in the mental health symptoms of children and adolescents presenting with SITBs (group with SITBs) were compared to those of children and adolescents with no SITBs (group without SITBs).
    RESULTS: Compared to the group without SITBs (1977/2161, 91.49%), the group with SITBs (184/2161, 8.51%) was mostly made up of adolescents (107/184, 58.2%) and female children and adolescents (118/184, 64.1%). At baseline, compared to the group without SITBs, the group with SITBs had more severe anxiety and depressive symptoms. From before to after mental health care with the DMHI, the 2 groups did not differ in the rate of children and adolescents with anxiety symptom improvement (group with SITBs: 54/70, 77% vs group without SITBs: 367/440, 83.4%; χ21=1.2; P=.32) as well as depressive symptom improvement (group with SITBs: 58/72, 81% vs group without SITBs: 255/313, 81.5%; χ21=0; P=.99). The 2 groups also did not differ in the amount of change in symptom severity during care with the DMHI for anxiety (t80.20=1.37; P=.28) and depressive (t83.75=-0.08; P=.99) symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that participation in a collaborative care DMHI is associated with improved mental health outcomes in children and adolescents experiencing SITBs. These results provide preliminary insights for the use of pediatric DMHIs in crisis support and mental health care for children and adolescents presenting with SITBs, thereby addressing the public health issue of acute mental health crisis in children and adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    行为成瘾模型认为,重复的自杀行为可以作为管理压力和负面情绪状态的适应不良策略,类似于物质成瘾。这两种行为都涉及负面情绪,提供暂时的心理救济,并坚持,表明共同的神经生物学机制。这项研究探讨了主要中继器之间的心理测量学差异,偶尔尝试,非自杀囚犯。
    一项针对四所监狱的363名囚犯的多中心横断面调查评估了抑郁症,认知情绪调节,冲动,感知压力,终生非自杀性自伤和自杀未遂。
    轻度抑郁症,中度自杀意念,中等程度的冲动很常见,将近一半的参与者至少尝试过一次自杀。分层多元回归分析显示,过去反复的自杀行为会增加对未来自杀念头的易感性,在反复尝试者中,自杀尝试是一种适应不良的情绪调节策略。
    结果揭示了情绪失调的差异,冲动,以及被研究群体中的压力应对策略,强化自杀作为一种行为成瘾的观念。成瘾的方法有助于解释以前的尝试者和自我保护者对后来的自杀想法的敏感性,为惩教环境中量身定制的干预措施提供有价值的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: The behavioral addiction model posits that repetitive suicidal behaviors can serve as maladaptive strategies for managing stress and negative emotional states, akin to substance addiction. Both behaviors involve negative emotions, offer temporary psychological relief, and persist, indicating shared neurobiological mechanisms. This study explored psychometric differences among major repeaters, occasional attempters, and non-suicidal prisoners.
    UNASSIGNED: A multi-centre cross-sectional survey of 363 inmates across four prisons assessed depression, cognitive-emotional regulation, impulsivity, perceived stress, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts.
    UNASSIGNED: Mild depression, moderate suicidal ideation, and moderate impulsivity were common, with nearly half of the participants having attempted suicide at least once. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that repeated suicidal behavior in the past increases susceptibility to future suicidal thoughts, with suicide attempts serving as a maladaptive emotion regulation strategy among repeated attempters.
    UNASSIGNED: The results reveal differences in emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and stress coping strategies among the studied groups, reinforcing the idea of suicidality as a form of behavioral addiction. The addiction approach helps explain the sensitivity to later suicidal thoughts in former attempters and self-harmers, offering valuable insights for tailored interventions within correctional settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号