Sclerosing Solutions

硬化解决方案
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腔内激光消融(EVLA)在大隐静脉(GSV)功能不全的治疗中具有良好的效果。然而,热消融的使用需要肿胀麻醉,并且存在热损伤的风险.机械化学腔内消融(MOCA)是一种非热消融(NTA)替代方法,将机械内皮损伤与硬化剂液体或泡沫的输注相结合。不需要肿胀麻醉。与EVLA相比,MOCA使用Clariven装置的初步经验表明,术中和术后疼痛较少,临床改善较快。弗列博格里夫(鲍顿,波兰)是一种相对较新的MOCA设备。要使用Flebogrif确定MOCA的作用,一个精心设计的,需要足够样本量和随访时间的随机对照临床试验.在这篇文章中,我们提供了REBORN试验的研究方案,旨在证明使用Flebogrif的MOCA在治疗GSV功能不全的解剖学成功方面并不逊色于EVLA。
    方法:这个多中心,开放标签,非自卑,观察者失明,随机对照试验在Flebogrif和EVLA之间随机分配被诊断为GSV功能不全,年龄为18~80岁的患者.3个参与中心的310名患者(西北诊所阿尔克马尔,皮肤和静脉诊所OosterwalAlkmaar和红十字会医院Beverwijk)将包括在内。主要结果是12个月时的解剖学成功。次要结果是术中疼痛,操作时间,技术上的成功,术后疼痛,安全,在其他随访时刻的解剖学成功,并发症,临床成功,美学结果,疾病特异性生活质量,再干预,前副隐静脉反流和新生血管形成。患者将在1周随访,治疗后1、6、12、24和60个月。
    背景:机构审查委员会(Vrije大学医学中心的医学伦理审查委员会)于2021年5月17日批准了该研究,病例号为2020.0740。书面知情同意书由协调研究者在研究登记之前从所有参与者获得。审判结束后,研究结果将提交给国际科学杂志进行同行评审。
    背景:荷兰的OverzichtvanMedisch-wetenschappelijkOnderzoek,NL-OMON25145,以前为NL9527;中央委员会MensgebondenOnderzoek,NL74491.029.20。
    BACKGROUND: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is associated with an excellent outcome in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. However, the use of thermal ablation requires tumescent anaesthesia and is associated with a risk of thermal damage. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) is a non-thermal ablation (NTA) alternative, which combines mechanical endothelial damage with the infusion of a sclerosant liquid or foam. Tumescent anaesthesia is not required. Preliminary experiences with MOCA using the Clarivein device show less intraprocedural and postprocedural pain and a faster clinical improvement compared with EVLA. Flebogrif (Balton, Poland) is a relatively new MOCA device. To determine the role of MOCA using Flebogrif, a well-designed, randomised controlled clinical trial of sufficient sample size and follow-up time is required. In this article, we provide the study protocol for the REBORN trial, aiming to demonstrate that MOCA using Flebogrif is not inferior to EVLA for the outcome of anatomical success in the treatment of GSV incompetence.
    METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial randomises patients who are diagnosed with GSV incompetence and aged 18-80 years between Flebogrif and EVLA. 310 patients in 3 participating centres (Northwest Clinics Alkmaar, Skin and Vein Clinic Oosterwal Alkmaar and Red Cross Hospital Beverwijk) will be included. The primary outcome is anatomical success at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are intraprocedural pain, operation time, technical success, postprocedural pain, safety, anatomical success during other follow-up moments, complications, clinical success, aesthetic result, disease-specific quality of life, reinterventions, anterior accessory saphenous vein reflux and neovascularisation. Patients will be followed up at 1 week, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 60 month(s) after treatment.
    BACKGROUND: The institutional review board (Medical Ethical Review Committee of the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center) approved this study on 17 May 2021 under case number 2020.0740. Written informed consent is obtained by the coordinating investigator from all participants prior to study enrolment. After completion of the trial, the results will be submitted to an international scientific journal for peer-reviewed publication.
    BACKGROUND: Overzicht van Medisch-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek in Nederland, NL-OMON25145, previously NL9527; Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek, NL74491.029.20.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜橡皮筋结扎术(ERBL)是一种非手术技术,用于治疗有症状的内痔,但由于复发和术后疼痛而受到限制。
    目的:为了评估满意度,长期复发,和术后疼痛治疗内痔联合使用脊髓灰质炎泡沫硬化剂和ERBL。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,多中心,随机研究。从四家三级医院共纳入了195例诊断为II-III级内痔的连续患者,并随机分为帽辅助内镜下脊髓灰质炎泡沫硬结(EFSB)或ERBL组。所有患者均随访12个月。使用痔疮严重程度评分(HSS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估基于症状的严重程度和术后疼痛。连续变量报告为中位数和四分位数范围。
    结果:纳入了119名患者,EFSB组98人。在8周时,EFSB组的HSS低于ERBL组[4.0(3.0-5.0)vs5.0(4.0-6.0),P=0.003]和12个月[2.0(1.0-3.0)vs3.0(2.0-3.0),P<0.001]的随访。在12个月时,EFSB组的脱垂复发率较低(11.2%vs21.6%,P=0.038)。多元线性回归分析表明,EFSB治疗[B=-0.915,95%置信区间(CI):-1.301至-0.530,P=0.001]和橡皮筋数量(B=0.843,95CI:0.595-1.092,P<0.001)与术后24小时的VAS评分呈负相关且独立相关。EFSB组的中位数VAS低于ERBL[2.0(1.0-3.0)vs3.0(2.0-4.0),P<0.001]。
    结论:Cap辅助的EFSB提供了长期满意度,并有效缓解了术后24小时的脱垂和疼痛复发。
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) is a nonsurgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids but is limited by recurrence and post-procedural pain.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate satisfaction, long-term recurrence, and post-procedural pain in managing internal hemorrhoids using a combination of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and ERBL.
    METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. A total of 195 consecutive patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids were enrolled from four tertiary hospitals and randomly divided into a cap-assisted endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB) or an ERBL group. All patients were followed-up for 12 months. Symptom-based severity and post-procedural pain were assessed using a hemorrhoid severity score (HSS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Continuous variables were reported as medians and interquartile range.
    RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled, with 98 in the EFSB group. HSS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL group at 8 weeks [4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0), P = 0.003] and 12-month [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0), P < 0.001] of follow-up. The prolapse recurrence rate was lower in the EFSB group at 12 months (11.2% vs 21.6%, P = 0.038). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that EFSB treatment [B = -0.915, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.301 to -0.530, P = 0.001] and rubber band number (B = 0.843, 95%CI: 0.595-1.092, P < 0.001) were negatively and independently associated with the VAS score 24 hours post-procedure. The median VAS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-4.0), P < 0.001].
    CONCLUSIONS: Cap-assisted EFSB provided long-term satisfaction and effective relief from the recurrence of prolapse and pain 24 hours post-procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Rusula是一种粘液囊肿,发生在口底的舌下腺(SLG)中。根据起源可以分为两种类型:一种是前段和Rivini导管中的较小舌下腺(LSLG),与之相连的,另一个是后段的大舌下腺(GSLG)。由于解剖特征,手术切除囊肿有损害邻近组织的风险,并且复发率高。硬化剂的病灶内注射可能是更好的替代疗法。我们总结了65例博莱霉素(BML)病灶内注射治疗的ranula病例。根据ranula的起源,60例来自LSLG和Rivini导管,5例来自GSLG。结果表明,在随访期间,来自LSLG和Rivini导管的ranula的60例治愈了100%。所有患者的中位注射次数为1.16。来自GSLG的所有5例ranula均未完全恢复。这项研究证实,BLM病灶内注射是LSLG或Rivini导管而不是GSLG囊肿的安全有效治疗方式。因此,治疗前,有必要通过表征囊肿的形态来确定囊肿的类型和起源,以确保治疗的有效性。
    Ranula is a mucous cyst that occurs in the sublingual gland (SLG) in the floor of the mouth. It can be classified into two types based on origins: One is the the lesser sublingual gland (LSLG) in the anterior segment and the Rivini duct, which is connected to it, and the other is the greater sublingual gland (GSLG) in the posterior segment. Because of the anatomical characteristics, surgical resection of the cysts carries the risk of damaging adjacent tissues and has a high recurrence rate. Intralesional injection of sclerotherapy may be a better alternative treatment. We summarized 65 cases of ranula treated with intralesional injections of bleomycin(BML). According to the origin of the ranula, 60 cases were from the LSLG and the Rivini duct, and 5 cases were from the GSLG. The results showed that 60 cases of ranula from LSLG and Rivini ducts were 100% cured during the follow-up period. The median number of injections for all patients was 1.16. All 5 cases of ranula from the GSLG did not wholly recover. This study confirmed that BLM intralesional injection is a safe and effective treatment modality for cysts from LSLG or the ducts of Rivini rather than GSLG. Therefore, before treatment, it is necessary to determine the type and origin of the cyst by characterizing its morphology to ensure the effectiveness of the treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:直肠海绵状血管瘤是一种罕见的,很少引起下消化道出血的良性血管疾病,误诊率和漏诊率较高。手术治疗被认为是相对有效的;然而,它伴随着某些用于治疗浅表性血管瘤,拥有微创手术的优势,包括安全,有效性,减少创伤,和快速恢复。然而,缺乏有关泡沫硬化剂在胃肠道血管瘤中应用的文献。
    我们介绍一例60岁男性患者,住院>1年反复便血,症状恶化1周。患者的病史并不明显。
    方法:结肠镜检查后,核磁共振成像,计算机断层扫描,和其他检查,最终诊断为直肠海绵状血管瘤。
    方法:由于患者拒绝手术,在获得患者及其亲属的知情同意后,使用聚桂醇注射液进行内镜泡沫硬化治疗.
    结果:硬化治疗后,便血症状停止,未观察到不良反应。两个月后,结肠镜和核磁共振成像显示血管瘤几乎完全消失,只有少量的肿瘤残留物,取得满意的疗效。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,内镜下注射聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂是一种安全的,有效,胃肠道海绵状血管瘤的微创治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: Rectal cavernous hemangioma is a rare, benign vascular disease that seldom causes lower gastrointestinal bleeding, characterized by a high rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses. Surgical treatment is considered to be relatively effective; however, it is accompanied by certain employed in the treatment of superficial hemangioma, boasting the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, including safety, effectiveness, reduced trauma, and rapid recovery. However, there is a lack of literature regarding the application of foam sclerosing agents for gastrointestinal hemangiomas.
    UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a 60-year-old male who was admitted to our hospital with a history of recurrent hematochezia for >1 year and worsening symptoms for 1 week. The patient\'s medical history was unremarkable.
    METHODS: Following colonoscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and other examinations, the final diagnosis was rectal cavernous hemangioma.
    METHODS: Due to the patient\'s refusal of surgery, endoscopic foam sclerotherapy using a lauromacrogol injection was performed after obtaining informed consent from the patient and their relatives.
    RESULTS: Post-sclerotherapy, hematochezia symptoms ceased, and no adverse reactions were observed. Two months later, colonoscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hemangioma had almost completely disappeared, with only a small amount of tumor remnants, yielding a satisfactory curative effect.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that endoscopic injection of a lauromacrogol foam sclerosing agent is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment option for gastrointestinal cavernous hemangiomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    对于有症状和低生育能力的男性,经皮睾丸精索静脉曲张栓塞术通常比性腺静脉手术结扎更可取,因为其微创方法和并发症发生率降低。胶水,线圈,血管塞,球囊和硬化剂以各种组合使用以实现足够的静脉闭塞。这里,我们报告了第一例已知的硬化剂材料迁移超出了用于治疗精索静脉曲张的栓塞线圈的位置,导致左肾静脉血栓.一名20多岁的男子在无并发症的左精索静脉曲张栓塞伴急性左侧腹痛2天后被送往急诊科,在CT上发现硬化剂物质导致同侧非闭塞性左肾静脉血栓并向下腔静脉延伸。他接受了3个月的抗凝治疗,3个月时的随访影像学显示该血栓消退,无肾功能损害。
    Percutaneous testicular varicocele embolisation for symptomatic and subfertile males is often preferred over surgical ligation of the gonadal vein due to its minimally invasive approach and reduced complication rate. Glues, coils, vascular plugs, balloons and sclerosants are used in various combinations to achieve sufficient venous occlusion. Here, we report on the first known case of sclerosant material migration beyond the placement of an embolisation coil for treatment of a varicocele, resulting in a left renal vein thrombus. A man in his 20s presented to the emergency department 2 days following uncomplicated left varicocele embolisation with acute left-sided abdominal pain, found to have sclerosant material causing an ipsilateral non-occlusive left renal vein thrombus with extension towards his inferior vena cava on CT. He was treated with 3 months of anticoagulation and follow-up imaging at 3 months showed resolution of this thrombus without renal impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    足底疣是常见的皮肤病变,继续代表着治疗挑战。他们仍然对治疗有抵抗力,并且高度复发,尽管有各种各样的治疗方法。针对脉管系统的疗法,如脉冲染料激光器,已成功用于治疗足底疣。Polidocanol,一种洗涤剂硬化剂,被批准用于无能力和扩张的隐静脉的硬化治疗,还被用作具有血管成分的广泛皮肤病症如血管瘤和化脓性肉芽肿的标签外疗法。当前,开放标签,prospective,初步研究旨在评估3%脊髓灰质炎治疗足底疣的安全性和有效性。20名患者(11名女性和9名男性),有足底疣,12-50岁的人每两周接受一次3%的脊髓灰质炎,直到完全清除或最多6次。对治疗的反应分级为完全(100%清除),部分(50-99%),无反应(<50%)。在研究结束时,12(60%)患者在1-5个疗程后完全清除了疣,5(25%)患者仅有部分反应,和3(15%)患者没有实现任何疣的清除。该程序在很大程度上是患者可以忍受的。9例(45%)和2例(10%)患者报告了注射部位疼痛和瘀伤,分别。两种副作用在几天内自发和完全消失。当前研究的结果表明,每两周一次的病灶内注射3%的脊髓灰质炎可能是安全的,有效,治疗足底疣的方法。
    Plantar warts are common skin lesions that continue to represent a therapeutic challenge. They are still resistant to therapy and are highly recurrent, despite the diverse number of treatments available. Therapies targeting vasculature, such as pulsed dye laser, have been used successfully in the treatment of plantar warts. Polidocanol, a detergent sclerosant approved for the sclerotherapy of incompetent and dilated saphenous veins, has also been used as an off-label therapy for a wide range of skin conditions with vascular components such as hemangiomas and pyogenic granuloma. The current, open-label, prospective, pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intralesional polidocanol 3% in the treatment of plantar warts. Twenty patients (11 females and 9 males), with plantar warts, aged 12-50 years received biweekly sessions of intralesional polidocanol 3% until complete clearance or for a maximum of 6 sessions. Response to treatment was graded as complete (100% clearance), partial (50-99%), and no response (< 50%). At the end of the study, 12 (60%) patients achieved complete clearance of their warts after 1-5 sessions, 5 (25%) patients had only partial response, and 3 (15%) patients did not achieve any clearance of their warts. The procedure was largely tolerable by patients. Pain at the injection site and bruises were reported by 9 (45%) and 2 (10%) patients, respectively. Both side effects resolved spontaneously and completely within a few days. The findings of the current study suggest that intralesional injection of 3% polidocanol in biweekly sessions may be a safe, effective, and tolerable method for the treatment of plantar warts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胆总管空肠吻合术部位与静脉曲张相关的出血并不常见,难以治疗,通常是门静脉高压症的致命表现。到目前为止,尚未制定治疗指南.
    方法:我们报告了在2021年6月至2023年8月期间在我们机构接受内镜下硬化治疗并注射聚桂醇/α-氰基丙烯酸丁酯的3例胆总管空肠吻合术部位出现空肠静脉曲张的患者。我们查看了所有的病人记录,临床表现,内镜检查结果和治疗,结果和后续行动。使用常规上消化道内窥镜检查对三名接受胰十二指肠切除术并进行Whipple吻合术的患者进行了检查,以怀疑来自传入空肠loop的出血。在所有三名患者中,在胆总管空肠吻合术部位周围均观察到静脉曲张伴近期出血或活动性出血。对所有三名患者在空肠静脉曲张进行了内窥镜注射聚桂醇/α-氰基丙烯酸丁酯。在两名患者中,出血停止,通畅持续26个月和2个月。在一名患有多器官功能衰竭和内部环境紊乱的患者中,内镜硬化治疗后1个月再出血,尽管进行了第二次内窥镜硬化治疗,反复出血和多器官功能衰竭导致最终死亡.
    结论:我们得出的结论是,聚桂醇/α-氰基丙烯酸丁酯注射液的内镜硬化治疗是一种简单的治疗方法,有效,胆总管空肠吻合术部位空肠静脉曲张出血的安全和低成本治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage associated with varices at the site of choledochojejunostomy is an unusual, difficult to treat, and often fatal manifestation of portal hypertension. So far, no treatment guidelines have been established.
    METHODS: We reported three patients with jejunal varices at the site of choledochojejunostomy managed by endoscopic sclerotherapy with lauromacrogol/α-butyl cyanoacrylate injection at our institution between June 2021 and August 2023. We reviewed all patient records, clinical presentation, endoscopic findings and treatment, outcomes and follow-up. Three patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with a Whipple anastomosis were examined using conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected hemorrhage from the afferent jejunal loop. Varices with stigmata of recent hemorrhage or active hemorrhage were observed around the choledochojejunostomy site in all three patients. Endoscopic injection of lauromacrogol/α-butyl cyanoacrylate was carried out at jejunal varices for all three patients. The bleeding ceased and patency was observed for 26 and 2 months in two patients. In one patient with multiorgan failure and internal environment disturbance, rebleeding occurred 1 month after endoscopic sclerotherapy, and despite a second endoscopic sclerotherapy, repeated episodes of bleeding and multiorgan failure resulted in eventual death.
    CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that endoscopic sclerotherapy with lauromacrogol/α-butyl cyanoacrylate injection can be an easy, effective, safe and low-cost treatment option for jejunal varicose bleeding at the site of choledochojejunostomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:下肢静脉曲张是一种常见的疾病,与几种可用的治疗方案有关,包括常规手术和脊髓灰质炎泡沫硬化剂治疗。然而,很少有研究根据患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)分析治疗方式结局.这项大样本量研究的目的是根据对PROMs的分析,评估与传统手术相比,使用脊髓灰质炎泡沫硬化剂治疗的结果。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,观察,和定性研究的205例患者谁接受了静脉曲张治疗与任一脊髓灰质炎醇泡沫硬化(57例患者,90条腿)或常规手术(148名患者,236条腿)。术前评估患者并在手术后30天使用静脉疾病严重程度评分(VCSS)和特定静脉疾病生活质量问卷(VEINES-QoL/Sym)进行重新评估。
    结果:两种治疗在手术后30天显著改善了VCSS和VEINES结果(p<0.05)。然而,手术促进了VCSS的更大改善(平均改善4.02分,p<0.001),VEINES-QoL(平均提高8分,p<0.001),和VEINES-Sym(平均提高11.66分,p<0.001)比硬化疗法。术后疼痛和对腿部的美学关注是问卷的领域,其中结果在治疗方式之间差异最大。硬化治疗效果较差.
    结论:脊髓灰质炎醇泡沫硬化剂治疗和常规手术均对患者30天后的生活质量产生积极影响,但对于接受传统手术的患者来说,这种改善更为显著。
    Lower limb varicose veins are a prevalent disease associated with several available treatment options, including conventional surgery and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. However, few studies have analyzed therapeutic modality outcomes based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). This large sample-size study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy compared to conventional surgery based on an analysis of PROMs.
    This was a prospective, observational, and qualitative study of 205 patients who underwent varicose vein treatment with either polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (57 patients, 90 legs) or conventional surgery (148 patients, 236 legs). Patients were preoperatively assessed and re-evaluated 30 days after the procedure using the Venous Disease Severity Score (VCSS) and specific venous disease quality-of-life questionnaires (VEINES-QoL/Sym).
    Both treatments significantly improved VCSS and VEINES results 30 days after the procedure (p < 0.05). However, surgery promoted greater improvements in VCSS (on average 4.02-points improvement, p < 0.001), VEINES-QoL (average 8-points improvement, p < 0.001), and VEINES-Sym (average 11.66 points improvement, p < 0.001) than did sclerotherapy. Postoperative pain and aesthetic concerns about the legs were the domains of the questionnaires in which the results varied the most between the treatment modalities, with worse results for sclerotherapy.
    Both polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and conventional surgery positively impact patients\' quality of life after 30 days, but the improvement is more significant for patients who undergo conventional surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为子宫内膜瘤的导管导向和针导向乙醇硬化治疗提供技术指导,并介绍这些硬化治疗方法的结果。
    方法:从2015年1月至2021年3月,评估了接受针针或导管硬化治疗的有症状的卵巢子宫内膜瘤患者的结果,回顾性。考虑以下因素,在手术过程中对每位患者应用哪种硬化治疗技术的决定:囊肿大小,囊肿位置,囊肿粘度,和组织刚性。
    结果:针式(n=34个囊肿)和导管式(n=34个囊肿)硬化治疗技术均有效,100%的技术成功率和97%的临床成功率。在接受针头定向硬化治疗的34个囊肿中,有两个(6%),发现复发,并通过导管定向硬化治疗成功复治.囊肿大小显著缩小,疼痛,和血清癌抗原125水平(p<0.05)。血清抗苗勒管激素水平未受影响,表明卵巢储备保留(p>0.05)。在那些治疗不孕症的人中,妊娠率为54%(n=6/11)。导管定向硬化疗法的平均±SD囊肿大小下降大于针针定向硬化疗法(5.5±3.1cmvs.4.0±2.1cm,p<0.05)。然而,导管定向硬化治疗组的治疗前囊肿体积明显更高(202.0±233.5mLvs.78.8±59.7mL,p<0.05),并与治疗后体积的显着减少有关(p<0.05)。
    结论:应在手术过程中确定导管定向和针头定向乙醇硬化疗法之间的选择,在可行的情况下,首选导管定向硬化治疗。做出这个决定的关键因素包括囊肿大小,囊肿位置,囊肿粘度,和组织刚性。证据水平3级,非对照回顾性队列研究。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide technical guidance on applying catheter-directed and needle-directed ethanol sclerotherapy for endometriomas and present the results of these sclerotherapy methods.
    METHODS: From January 2015 to March 2021, the results of the patients with symptomatic ovarian endometriomas who underwent needle-directed or catheter-directed sclerotherapy were evaluated, retrospectively. The decision to apply which sclerotherapy technique was made during the procedure for each patient considering the following factors: cyst size, cyst location, cyst viscosity, and tissue rigidity.
    RESULTS: Both needle-directed (n = 34 cysts) and catheter-directed (n = 34 cysts) sclerotherapy techniques were effective, with a 100% technical success rate and a 97% clinical success rate. In two of 34 cysts (6%) treated with needle-directed sclerotherapy, recurrence was detected and successfully retreated with catheter-directed sclerotherapy. Significant reductions in cyst size, pain, and serum cancer antigen 125 levels (p < 0.05) were noted. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels remained unaffected, indicating preserved ovarian reserve (p > 0.05). Among those treated for infertility, the pregnancy rate was 54% (n = 6/11). The mean ± SD cyst size decline was greater in catheter-directed sclerotherapy than needle-directed sclerotherapy (5.5 ± 3.1 cm vs. 4.0 ± 2.1 cm, p < 0.05). However, the pretreatment cyst volumes were considerably higher in catheter-directed sclerotherapy group (202.0 ± 233.5 mL vs. 78.8 ± 59.7 mL, p < 0.05) and were associated with significant post-treatment volume decrease (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The choice between catheter-directed and needle-directed ethanol sclerotherapy should be determined during the procedure, with a preference for catheter-directed sclerotherapy when feasible. Crucial factors in making this decision include cyst size, cyst location, cyst viscosity, and tissue rigidity. Level of evidence Level 3, non-controlled retrospective cohort study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号