SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SIRS,全身炎症反应综合征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重的酒精性肝炎(SAH)是一种严重的疾病,急性肾损伤(AKI)的存在进一步危及患者的生存。然而,AKI对SAH生存的影响尚未在亚洲这一地区进行评估.
    这项研究是对胃肠病科住院的连续酒精相关性肝病(ALD)患者进行的,SCB医学院,Cuttack,印度,2016年10月至2018年12月。在诊断SAH(mDF评分≥32)时,人口统计学,临床,并记录实验室参数,比较有和无AKI患者的生存率(AKIN标准).此外,在存在和不存在AKI的情况下,比较了由其他标准和预后模型定义的SAH患者的生存率.
    309(70.71%)ALD患者患有SAH,其中201例(65%)患有AKI。SAH合并AKI患者总白细胞计数较高,总胆红素,血清肌酐,血清尿素,INR,MELD(UNOS),MELD(Na+),CTP评分,mDF分数,格拉斯哥得分,ABIC得分,根据EASL-CLIF联盟标准,急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的患病率增加(P<0.001)。Further,他们延长了住院时间,住院期间死亡人数增加,在28天以及90天(P<0.001)。在SAH中也观察到生存率的显着差异(根据MELD,ABIC,和GAHS标准)高于AKI标记截止值的患者。
    超过三分之二的ALD患者患有SAH,大约三分之二的人患有AKI。SAH和AKI患者的ACLF患病率增加,住院时间更长,住院期间28天和90天的死亡率增加。
    SAH是一种危急情况,AKI的存在会对其生存产生负面影响。因此,早期发现SAH和AKI,以及尽早开始治疗,对更好的生存至关重要。我们在印度东部沿海地区进行的研究首次证明了ALD患者中SAH的患病率以及该地区SAH患者中AKI的患病率。这些知识将有助于管理来自世界该地区的这些患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) is a grave condition, and the presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) further jeopardizes patient survival. However, the impact of AKI on survival in SAH has not been assessed from this region of Asia.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted on consecutive alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) patients hospitalized in Gastroenterology Department, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, India, between October 2016 and December 2018. On diagnosis of SAH (mDF score ≥32), demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were recorded, and survival was compared between patients with and without AKI (AKIN criteria). In addition, survival was compared among SAH patients defined by other criteria and prognostic models in the presence and absence of AKI.
    UNASSIGNED: 309 (70.71%) of ALD patients had SAH, and 201 (65%) of them had AKI. SAH patients with AKI had higher total leucocyte count, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, serum urea, INR, MELD (UNOS), MELD (Na+), CTP score, mDF score, Glasgow score, ABIC score, and increased prevalence of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) as per EASL-CLIF Consortium criteria (P < 0.001). Further, they had prolonged hospital stay, and increased death during hospitalization, at 28 days as well as 90 days (P < 0.001). Significant differences in survival were also seen in SAH (as per MELD, ABIC, and GAHS criteria) patients above the marked cut offs in respect to AKI.
    UNASSIGNED: Over two-thirds of ALD patients had SAH, and about two-thirds had AKI. Patients with SAH and AKI had an increased prevalence of ACLF, longer hospital stay, and increased mortality during hospitalization at 28 days and 90 days.
    UNASSIGNED: SAH is a critical condition, and the presence of AKI negatively affects their survival. Hence, early identification of SAH and AKI, as well as early initiation of treatment, is crucial for better survival. Our study from the coastal part of eastern India is the first to demonstrate the prevalence of SAH among patients with ALD along with the prevalence of AKI among SAH patients in this region. This knowledge will be helpful in managing these patients from this region of world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精相关性肝病是慢性肝病的主要病因之一。它包括临床组织学表现,从脂肪变性,脂肪性肝炎,不同程度的纤维化,包括肝硬化和严重的坏死性炎,称为酒精相关性肝炎。在这个重点更新中,我们的目标是提出治疗酒精相关性肝病的具体干预措施和策略.目前所有症状的治疗证据来自一般慢性肝病的建议,但更强调禁欲和营养支持。禁欲应包括治疗酒精使用障碍以及戒断综合征。营养评估还应考虑肌少症的存在及其临床表现,脆弱。应评估疾病的补偿程度,和并发症,积极寻求。这种疾病最严重的急性形式是酒精相关性肝炎,有很高的死亡率和发病率。目前的治疗基于皮质类固醇,其通过减少免疫激活并阻断细胞毒性和炎症途径起作用。治疗的其他方面包括预防和治疗肝肾综合征以及预防感染,尽管没有明确的证据表明益生菌和抗生素在预防中的益处。酒精相关性肝炎的新疗法包括美他多辛,白细胞介素-22类似物,和白细胞介素-1-β拮抗剂.最后,粒细胞集落刺激因子,微生物移植,和肠-肝轴调制已显示出有希望的结果。我们还讨论了晚期酒精相关肝病的姑息治疗。
    Alcohol-associated liver disease is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease. It comprises a clinical-histologic spectrum of presentations, from steatosis, steatohepatitis, to different degrees of fibrosis, including cirrhosis and severe necroinflammatory disease, called alcohol-associated hepatitis. In this focused update, we aim to present specific therapeutic interventions and strategies for the management of alcohol-associated liver disease. Current evidence for management in all spectra of manifestations is derived from general chronic liver disease recommendations, but with a higher emphasis on abstinence and nutritional support. Abstinence should comprise the treatment of alcohol use disorder as well as withdrawal syndrome. Nutritional assessment should also consider the presence of sarcopenia and its clinical manifestation, frailty. The degree of compensation of the disease should be evaluated, and complications, actively sought. The most severe acute form of this disease is alcohol-associated hepatitis, which has high mortality and morbidity. Current treatment is based on corticosteroids that act by reducing immune activation and blocking cytotoxicity and inflammation pathways. Other aspects of treatment include preventing and treating hepatorenal syndrome as well as preventing infections although there is no clear evidence as to the benefit of probiotics and antibiotics in prophylaxis. Novel therapies for alcohol-associated hepatitis include metadoxine, interleukin-22 analogs, and interleukin-1-beta antagonists. Finally, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, microbiota transplantation, and gut-liver axis modulation have shown promising results. We also discuss palliative care in advanced alcohol-associated liver disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症的发展是肝移植后不良预后的主要原因。中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是一种易于计算的炎症生物标志物。我们的目标是利用NLR来诊断和预测接受活体供体肝移植(LDLT)的患者的败血症发作。
    对314例接受选择性ABO相容性LDLT的连续成年患者的围手术期进行分析。患者被分为两组;那些发生败血症的人和对照组。通过SIRS和临床/放射学怀疑感染的组合来定义脓毒症。通过将中性粒细胞的百分比除以外周血中淋巴细胞的百分比来计算NLR。
    有至少一次脓毒症发作的314名患者中有127名(40.5%)被纳入脓毒症队列,并与对照组的187名(59.5%)患者进行比较。人口统计学和基线特征,包括NLR(13.74±0.99vs.12.65±0.57,P=0.294)在术前具有可比性。脓毒症队列的NLR显着高于对照组(15.01±1.67vs.9.98±0.63,P=0.001)在脓毒症发生前3天,并在脓毒症发生当天保持明显升高。在脓毒症发生前1天,NLR覆盖下的面积最大(r=0.707),特异性,正预测值,阴性预测值为62.4%,62.2%,51.4%,72.0%,分别,截止时间为8.5。
    NLR是诊断和预防LDLT中败血症发展的有用工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Development of sepsis is a major contributor to poor outcomes after liver transplant. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily calculable inflammatory biomarker. We aim to utilize NLR to diagnose and predict the onset of sepsis in patients undergoing living donor liver transplants (LDLT).
    UNASSIGNED: Analysis of the perioperative course of 314 consecutive adult patients who underwent elective ABO compatible LDLT was done. Patients were divided into two cohorts; those who developed sepsis and a control group. Sepsis was defined by the combination of SIRS and clinical/radiological suspicion of infection. NLR was calculated by dividing the percentage of neutrophils by the percentage of lymphocytes in peripheral blood.
    UNASSIGNED: ostoperatively, 127 out of 314 patients (40.5%) having at least one episode of sepsis were included in the septic cohort and were compared to the 187 (59.5%) patients in the control group. Demographic and baseline characteristics, including NLR (13.74 ± 0.99 vs. 12.65 ± 0.57, P = 0.294) were comparable preoperatively. The NLR of the septic cohort was significantly higher than the control cohort (15.01 ± 1.67 vs. 9.98 ± 0.63, P = 0.001) 3 days prior to sepsis and remained significantly higher till the day of sepsis. The area under the cover was maximum for NLR 1 day prior to the development of sepsis (r = 0.707) with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 62.4%, 62.2%, 51.4%, and 72.0%, respectively, at a cutoff of 8.5.
    UNASSIGNED: NLR is a useful tool in diagnosing and pre-empting development of sepsis in LDLT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状病毒病是由SARS-CoV-2病毒引起的。该病毒于2019年12月首次出现在武汉(中国),并已在全球传播。到现在为止,它影响了224个国家和地区的2.69亿人,530万人死亡。随着Omicron等变体的出现,COVID-19病例呈指数级增长,数千人死亡。COVID-19的一般症状包括发烧,喉咙痛,咳嗽,肺部感染,and,在严重的情况下,急性呼吸窘迫综合征,脓毒症,和死亡。SARS-CoV-2主要影响肺部,但它也会影响其他器官,如大脑,心,和胃肠系统。据观察,75%的住院COVID-19患者患有至少一种COVID-19相关的共病。最常见的合并症是高血压,NDS,糖尿病,癌症,内皮功能障碍,和CVD。此外,老年患者和既往复药患者的COVID-19相关并发症恶化。SARS-CoV-2还会导致坏疽等高凝问题,中风,肺栓塞,以及其他相关并发症。这篇综述旨在提供关于COVID-19对心血管疾病等现有合并症影响的最新信息,NDS,COPD,和其他并发症。这篇综述将帮助我们了解COVID-19和合并症的现状;因此,它将在解决此类并发症的管理和决策工作中发挥重要作用。
    Coronavirus disease is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The virus first appeared in Wuhan (China) in December 2019 and has spread globally. Till now, it affected 269 million people with 5.3 million deaths in 224 countries and territories. With the emergence of variants like Omicron, the COVID-19 cases grew exponentially, with thousands of deaths. The general symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, sore throat, cough, lung infections, and, in severe cases, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and death. SARS-CoV-2 predominantly affects the lung, but it can also affect other organs such as the brain, heart, and gastrointestinal system. It is observed that 75 % of hospitalized COVID-19 patients have at least one COVID-19 associated comorbidity. The most common reported comorbidities are hypertension, NDs, diabetes, cancer, endothelial dysfunction, and CVDs. Moreover, older and pre-existing polypharmacy patients have worsened COVID-19 associated complications. SARS-CoV-2 also results in the hypercoagulability issues like gangrene, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and other associated complications. This review aims to provide the latest information on the impact of the COVID-19 on pre-existing comorbidities such as CVDs, NDs, COPD, and other complications. This review will help us to understand the current scenario of COVID-19 and comorbidities; thus, it will play an important role in the management and decision-making efforts to tackle such complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:单次内镜取石(ESE)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在治疗合并胆石症(胆石症[GSD])和胆总管结石(胆总管结石[CBDS])方面效果最佳。术中胆管造影的传统会合技术与各种技术(肠扩张,冷冻卡洛的三角形,术中胆管造影等方面的限制)和后勤困难(手术室缺乏经过培训的ESE人员和设备)。我们修改了ESE-LC(串联ESE-LC)的方法,以研究该方法的安全性,并克服了传统会合方法的这些缺点。
    方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月GSD和疑似CBDS患者进行前瞻性研究。串联ESE-LC包括ESE和LC在相同的全身麻醉下,而ESE是在内窥镜套件中使用二氧化碳吹气进行的,使用球囊/篮来实现胆管清除,并且通过闭塞胆管造影证实了这一点。然后将患者转移到手术室进行LC。主要结果包括胆管清除和手术安全性。
    结果:在评估合格的56名患者中,42人被纳入研究(平均年龄:53岁,25[60%]女性)。胆绞痛是最常见的症状(n=24,57%),其次是急性胆囊炎(n=11,26%)。结石数量和结石大小的中位数为1(1-6)和4毫米(3-10),分别。所有患者均成功清除胆管。5例(12%)患者进行了支架植入。术中,Calot的解剖困难,分别在10例和11例患者中冻结。13例(31%)患者的胆囊管短而宽。6例(14%)患者进行了胆囊次全切除术。术后住院时间中位数为1(0-13)天。三名患者在日托基础上进行了串联ESE-LC。1例患者经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎,另一个需要经皮引流来收集胆囊窝。在18(3-28)个月的中位随访中,没有患者保留CBDS。
    结论:串联ESE-LC是治疗合并GSD和CBDS的安全有效方法。
    BACKGROUND: Single-session endoscopic stone extraction (ESE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has the best outcome in managing concomitant cholelithiasis (gallstone disease [GSD]) and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stone [CBDS]). Traditional rendezvous technique with an intraoperative cholangiogram is associated with various technical (bowel distention, frozen Calot\'s triangle, limitation of intraoperative cholangiogram and so on) and logistical difficulties (lack of trained personnel and equipment for ESE in the operating room). We modified our approach of ESE-LC (tandem ESE-LC) to study the safety of the approach and overcome these disadvantages of the traditional rendezvous approach.
    METHODS: A prospective study of patients with GSD and suspected CBDS from January 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. Tandem ESE-LC involves ESE and LC under the same general anaesthesia in a single day, while ESE is performed in the endoscopic suite using carbon dioxide insufflation, a balloon/basket was used for achieving bile duct clearance and the same was confirmed with an occlusion cholangiogram. Patients were then shifted to the operating room for LC. The primary outcome included bile duct clearance and safety of the procedure.
    RESULTS: Of 56 patients assessed for eligibility, 42 were included in the study (median age: 53 years, 25 [60%] women). Biliary colic was the most common presenting symptom (n = 24, 57%), followed by acute cholecystitis (n = 11, 26%). The median number of stones and stone size was 1 (1-6) and 4 mm (3-10), respectively. All patients had successful bile duct clearance. Stenting was performed in 5 (12%) patients. Intraoperatively, Calot\'s dissection was difficult and frozen in 10 and 11 patients respectively. The cystic duct was short and wide in 13 (31%) patients. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 6 (14%) patients. The median duration of postprocedural hospital stay was 1 (0-13) day. Three patients had tandem ESE-LC on a day-care basis. One patient had post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography pancreatitis, and another required percutaneous drainage for gall bladder fossa collection. No patient had retained CBDS at a median follow-up of 18 (3-28) months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tandem ESE-LC is safe and effective method in managing concomitant GSD and CBDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肝硬化患者中,胃肠道念珠菌病通常被忽视,并且可能是严重的感染。因此,我们评估了患病率,危险因素,和肝硬化食管念珠菌病(EC)的结果,并进行了系统评价,以总结EC在肝硬化中的可用证据。
    方法:在2019年1月至2020年3月期间,在三级护理机构连续接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的肝硬化患者进行了EC(病例)筛查。根据EGD发现和/或刷子细胞学诊断出EC。对照组(无EC)随机招募,在病例和对照组之间比较EC的危险因素和结局。搜索了四个电子数据库,以进行描述肝硬化中EC的研究。在随机效应荟萃分析中汇总了EC的患病率估计值,异质性通过I2进行评估。使用患病率研究清单来评估研究中的偏倚风险。
    结果:在2762例肝硬化患者中有100例(3.6%)被诊断为EC。EC患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)较高(12.4vs.11.2;P=0.007),慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)(26%vs.10%;P=0.003)和伴随的细菌感染(24%vs.7%;P=0.001),与对照组相比。多变量模型,包括最近的酗酒,肝细胞癌(HCC),上消化道(UGI)出血,ACLF,糖尿病,MELD,预测肝硬化中EC的发展具有出色的辨别能力(C指数:0.918)。6%的病例发展为侵袭性疾病,并伴有多器官衰竭,4例EC患者在随访中死亡。在确定的236篇文章中,来自8项研究(均具有低偏倚风险)的EC合并患病率为2.1%(95%CI:0.8-5.8)。肝硬化的危险因素和结果未在文献中报道。
    结论:EC不是肝硬化患者的罕见感染,它可能易患侵袭性念珠菌病和过早死亡。酗酒,HCC,UGI出血,ACLF,糖尿病,较高的MELD是肝硬化中EC的独立预测因子。有肝硬化或有吞咽症状的高危患者应迅速筛查并治疗EC。
    BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal candidiasis is often neglected and potentially serious infection in cirrhosis patients. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of esophageal candidiasis (EC) in cirrhotics and did a systematic review to summarize EC\'s available evidence in cirrhosis.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis posted for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a tertiary care institute were screened for EC (cases) between January 2019 and March 2020. EC was diagnosed on EGD findings and/or brush cytology. Controls (without EC) were recruited randomly, and EC\'s risk factors and outcomes were compared between cases and controls.Four electronic databases were searched for studies describing EC in cirrhosis. Prevalence estimates of EC were pooled on random-effects meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed by I2. A checklist for prevalence studies was used to evaluate the risk of bias in studies.
    RESULTS: EC was diagnosed in 100 of 2762 patients with cirrhosis (3.6%). Patients with EC had a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (12.4 vs. 11.2; P = 0.007), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) (26% vs. 10%; P = 0.003) and concomitant bacterial infections (24% vs. 7%; P = 0.001), as compared with controls. A multivariable model, including recent alcohol binge, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed, ACLF, diabetes, and MELD, predicted EC\'s development in cirrhosis with excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.918). Six percent of cases developed the invasive disease and worsened with multiorgan failures, and four patients with EC died on follow-up.Of 236 articles identified, EC\'s pooled prevalence from 8 studies (all with low-risk of bias) was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.8-5.8). Risk factors and outcomes of EC in cirrhosis were not reported in the literature.
    CONCLUSIONS: EC is not a rare infection in cirrhosis patients, and it may predispose to invasive candidiasis and untimely deaths. Alcohol binge, HCC, UGI bleed, ACLF, diabetes, and higher MELD are the independent predictors of EC in cirrhosis. At-risk patients with cirrhosis or those with deglutition symptoms should be rapidly screened and treated for EC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们试图验证心血管造影和干预协会(SCAI)心源性休克分类在脓毒症和合并心血管疾病或感染性心源性休克混合性患者死亡风险分层中的应用。我们对入院诊断为败血症的心脏重症监护病房患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。我们用临床,生命体征,和入院后最初24小时的实验室数据,以分配SCAI休克阶段。我们纳入了605例患者,中位年龄为69.4岁(四分位距,57.9至79.8年),其中222人(36.7%)为女性。480例患者出现急性冠脉综合征或心力衰竭(79.3%),271例患者(44.8%)出现心源性休克或心脏骤停。第1天序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)心血管亚评分的中位数为1.5(四分位距,1至4),入院SCAI休克阶段分布为B阶段,40.7%(246);C阶段,19.3%(117);D阶段,32.9%(199);和E阶段,7.1%(43)。605例患者中有177例(29.3%)发生院内死亡率,并且随着SCAI休克阶段的增加而增加。经过多变量调整后,入院SCAI休克阶段与住院死亡率相关(每个阶段的校正比值比,1.46;95%CI,1.14至1.88;P=.003)。入院SCAI休克阶段对住院死亡率的歧视高于第1天SOFA心血管子评分(受试者工作特征曲线下面积,0.68vs0.64;DeLong检验P=.04)。入院SCAI休克阶段与1年死亡率相关(每个阶段的校正风险比,1.19;95%CI,1.03至1.37;P=.02)。SCAI休克分类提供了在第1天SOFA心血管亚评分改善的死亡风险分层在心脏重症监护病房患者败血症和并发心血管疾病或混合败血症心源性休克。
    We sought to validate the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification for mortality risk stratification in patients with sepsis and concomitant cardiovascular disease or mixed septic-cardiogenic shock. We conducted a single-center retropective cohort study of cardiac intensive care unit patients with an admission diagnosis of sepsis. We used clinical, vital sign, and laboratory data during the first 24 hours after admission to assign SCAI shock stage. We included 605 patients with a median age of 69.4 years (interquartile range, 57.9 to 79.8 years), 222 of whom (36.7%) were female. Acute coronary syndrome or heart failure was present in 480 patients (79.3%), and cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest was present in 271 patients (44.8%). The median day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) cardiovascular subscore was 1.5 (interquartile range, 1 to 4), and the admission SCAI shock stage distribution was stage B, 40.7% (246); stage C, 19.3% (117); stage D, 32.9% (199); and stage E, 7.1% (43). In-hospital mortality occurred in 177 of the 605 patients (29.3%) and increased incrementally with higher SCAI shock stage. After multivariable adjustment, admission SCAI shock stage was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio per stage, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.88; P=.003). Admission SCAI shock stage had higher discrimination for in-hospital mortality than the day 1 SOFA cardiovascular subscore (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68 vs 0.64; P=.04 by the DeLong test). Admission SCAI shock stage was associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio per stage, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.37; P=.02). The SCAI shock classification provides improved mortality risk stratification over the day 1 SOFA cardiovascular subscore in cardiac intensive care unit patients with sepsis and concomitant cardiovascular disease or mixed septic-cardiogenic shock.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)仍然是肝硬化的主要并发症。然而,SBP在确定患者生存率方面的发生率和真正影响尚不清楚.这项研究旨在评估SBP发展的发生率和危险因素以及SBP在预测无移植生存中的作用。
    两百名连续患者接受了492次腹水生化和微生物学分析。当对给定的患者进行了多个辅助治疗时,本研究纳入了首次SBP阳性穿刺术或无SBP诊断时进行的首次穿刺术.
    在202例患者中的28例(13.9%)中检测到SBP;在28例患者中的26例中,腹水中性粒细胞计数≥250个细胞/μl,在28名患者中,有15名患者,文化是积极的。与SBP独立相关的变量如下:终末期肝病(MELD)评分较高的模型,血清葡萄糖值,血清CRP水平升高,和更高的血清钾水平。总的来说,中位(范围)无移植生存期为289(54-1253)天.一百名(49.5%)病人死亡,而35例患者(17.3%)接受了肝移植。死亡或肝移植的独立预测因素是较高的MELD评分和SBP的发展,特别是如果它是抗生素耐药或复发性SBP。
    SBP的发生与更严重的肝功能障碍以及炎症的存在有关。与SBP本身的发生不同,一线抗生素治疗失败和SBP复发似乎对死亡率有很大影响.
    UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) remains a major complication of cirrhosis. However, the incidence and the real impact of SBP in determining patient survival rates remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for SBP development and the role of SBP in predicting transplant-free survival.
    UNASSIGNED: Two hundred two consecutive patients underwent 492 paracenteses with biochemical and microbiological analysis of the ascitic fluid. When multiple paracenteses had been performed on a given patient, the first SBP-positive paracentesis or the first paracentesis conducted when none was diagnostic for SBP was included in the study.
    UNASSIGNED: SBP was detected in 28 of 202 (13.9%) patients; in 26 of 28 patients, the neutrophil count in the ascitic fluid was ≥250 cells/μl, and in 15 of 28 patients, the cultures were positive. Variables independently associated with SBP were as follows: a higher model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, the serum glucose value, elevated CRP serum levels, and higher potassium serum levels. Overall, the median (range) transplant-free survival was 289 (54-1253) days. One hundred (49.5%) patients died, whereas 35 patients (17.3%) underwent liver transplantation. Independent predictors of death or liver transplantation were a higher MELD score and the development of SBP, especially if it was antibiotic-resistant or recurrent SBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The occurrence of SBP is associated with more severe liver dysfunction in conjunction with the presence of inflammation. Unlike the occurrence of SBP per se, failure of first-line antibiotic treatment and SBP recurrence appear to strongly influence the mortality rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    黄磷或金属磷化物(YPMP),例如铝(AlP)磷化锌(Zn3P2)的意外或自杀性中毒通常会引起急性肝功能衰竭(ALF)和心脏毒性。这些被用作家庭,农业和工业灭鼠剂以及弹药生产中,鞭炮和肥料。在没有临床可用的诊断或毒素测量实验室测试或解毒剂的情况下,即使在拥有专门的肝脏重症监护病房(LICU)和肝移植设施的三级护理中心,管理他们的中毒也具有挑战性。
    方法:使用标准化临床,血液动力学,生物化学,新陈代谢,神经学,心电图(ECG)和SOFA评分,并使用统一的重症监护进行管理,LICU的治疗和移植方案。社会人口特征,临床和生化参数和评分进行总结,并比较3组,即自发幸存者,移植患者和非幸存者。还评估了自发存活和肝移植需求的预测因子。
    结果:19例与YPMP相关的ALF患者年龄约为32岁(63.2%为女性),在中毒后的中位数为3(0-10)天。YPMP相关的心脏毒性是快速进展和致命的,而肝移植是ALF的治疗方法。自发性幸存者的剂量较低(<17.5克),没有心脏毒性,<他3级,乳酸<5.8,SOFA评分<14.5,SOFA评分增加<5.5。由于PT-INR>6.5而需要CVVHDF和KCC阳性的肾衰竭患者具有更高的死亡风险。接受肝移植和自发恢复的患者需要更长的ICU和住院时间。在3.4(2.6-5.5)年的中位随访时间,所有自发性幸存者和移植患者的肝功能均正常。
    结论:早期转移到专业中心,先发制人的密切监测,重症监护和器官通气支持,CVVHDF,血浆置换和其他人可以最大限度地提高他们的自发恢复的机会,允许准确的预测和及时的肝移植。
    Accidental or suicidal poisoning with yellow phosphorus or metal phosphides (YPMP) such as aluminum (AlP) zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) commonly cause acute liver failure (ALF) and cardiotoxicity. These are used as household, agricultural and industrial rodenticides and in production of ammunitions, firecrackers and fertilizers. In absence of a clinically available laboratory test for diagnosis or toxin measurement or an antidote, managing their poisoning is challenging even at a tertiary care center with a dedicated liver intensive care unit (LICU) and liver transplant facility.
    METHODS: Patients with YPMP related ALF were monitored using standardized clinical, hemodynamic, biochemical, metabolic, neurological, electrocardiography (ECG) and SOFA score and managed using uniform intensive care, treatment and transplant protocols in LICU. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and biochemical parameters and scores were summarized and compared between 3 groups i.e. spontaneous survivors, transplanted patients and non-survivors. Predictors of spontaneous survival and the need for liver transplant are also evaluated.
    RESULTS: Nineteen patients with YPMP related ALF were about 32 years old (63.2% females) and presented to us at a median of 3 (0 - 10) days after poisoning. YPMP related cardiotoxicity was rapidly progressive and fatal whereas liver transplant was therapeutic for ALF. Spontaneous survivors had lower dose ingestion (<17.5 grams), absence of cardiotoxicity, < grade 3 HE, lactate < 5.8, SOFA score < 14.5, and increase in SOFA score by < 5.5. Patients with renal failure need for CVVHDF and KCC positivity on account of PT-INR > 6.5 had higher mortality risk. Patients undergoing liver transplant and with spontaneous recovery required longer ICU and hospital stay. At median follow-up of 3.4 (2.6 - 5.5) years, all spontaneous survivors and transplanted patients are well with normal liver function.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early transfer to a specialized center, pre-emptive close monitoring, and intensive care and organ support with ventilation, CVVHDF, plasmapheresis and others may maximize their chances of spontaneous recovery, allow accurate prognostication and a timely liver transplant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肝衰竭(ALF)是罕见的,不可预测的,各种病因导致的急性肝损伤(ALI)的潜在致命并发症。文献中报道的ALF病因具有区域差异,影响临床表现和自然病程。在旨在反映印度临床实践的共识文章的这一部分中,疾病负担,流行病学,临床表现,监测,和预测已经讨论过了。在印度,病毒性肝炎是ALF的最常见原因,抗结核药物引起的药物性肝炎是第二常见的原因。ALF的临床表现以黄疸为特征,凝血病,和脑病。区分ALF和其他肝衰竭的原因是很重要的,包括慢性急性肝衰竭,亚急性肝功能衰竭,以及某些可以模仿这种表现的热带感染。该疾病通常具有暴发性临床过程,短期死亡率很高。死亡通常归因于脑部并发症,感染,导致多器官衰竭。及时肝移植(LT)可以改变结果,因此,在可以安排LT之前,为患者提供重症监护至关重要。评估预后以选择适合LT的患者同样重要。已经提出了几个预后评分,他们的比较表明,本土开发的动态分数比西方世界描述的分数更具优势。ALF的管理将在本文件的第2部分中描述。
    Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号