SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SIRS,全身炎症反应综合征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:单次内镜取石(ESE)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在治疗合并胆石症(胆石症[GSD])和胆总管结石(胆总管结石[CBDS])方面效果最佳。术中胆管造影的传统会合技术与各种技术(肠扩张,冷冻卡洛的三角形,术中胆管造影等方面的限制)和后勤困难(手术室缺乏经过培训的ESE人员和设备)。我们修改了ESE-LC(串联ESE-LC)的方法,以研究该方法的安全性,并克服了传统会合方法的这些缺点。
    方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月GSD和疑似CBDS患者进行前瞻性研究。串联ESE-LC包括ESE和LC在相同的全身麻醉下,而ESE是在内窥镜套件中使用二氧化碳吹气进行的,使用球囊/篮来实现胆管清除,并且通过闭塞胆管造影证实了这一点。然后将患者转移到手术室进行LC。主要结果包括胆管清除和手术安全性。
    结果:在评估合格的56名患者中,42人被纳入研究(平均年龄:53岁,25[60%]女性)。胆绞痛是最常见的症状(n=24,57%),其次是急性胆囊炎(n=11,26%)。结石数量和结石大小的中位数为1(1-6)和4毫米(3-10),分别。所有患者均成功清除胆管。5例(12%)患者进行了支架植入。术中,Calot的解剖困难,分别在10例和11例患者中冻结。13例(31%)患者的胆囊管短而宽。6例(14%)患者进行了胆囊次全切除术。术后住院时间中位数为1(0-13)天。三名患者在日托基础上进行了串联ESE-LC。1例患者经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎,另一个需要经皮引流来收集胆囊窝。在18(3-28)个月的中位随访中,没有患者保留CBDS。
    结论:串联ESE-LC是治疗合并GSD和CBDS的安全有效方法。
    BACKGROUND: Single-session endoscopic stone extraction (ESE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has the best outcome in managing concomitant cholelithiasis (gallstone disease [GSD]) and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stone [CBDS]). Traditional rendezvous technique with an intraoperative cholangiogram is associated with various technical (bowel distention, frozen Calot\'s triangle, limitation of intraoperative cholangiogram and so on) and logistical difficulties (lack of trained personnel and equipment for ESE in the operating room). We modified our approach of ESE-LC (tandem ESE-LC) to study the safety of the approach and overcome these disadvantages of the traditional rendezvous approach.
    METHODS: A prospective study of patients with GSD and suspected CBDS from January 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. Tandem ESE-LC involves ESE and LC under the same general anaesthesia in a single day, while ESE is performed in the endoscopic suite using carbon dioxide insufflation, a balloon/basket was used for achieving bile duct clearance and the same was confirmed with an occlusion cholangiogram. Patients were then shifted to the operating room for LC. The primary outcome included bile duct clearance and safety of the procedure.
    RESULTS: Of 56 patients assessed for eligibility, 42 were included in the study (median age: 53 years, 25 [60%] women). Biliary colic was the most common presenting symptom (n = 24, 57%), followed by acute cholecystitis (n = 11, 26%). The median number of stones and stone size was 1 (1-6) and 4 mm (3-10), respectively. All patients had successful bile duct clearance. Stenting was performed in 5 (12%) patients. Intraoperatively, Calot\'s dissection was difficult and frozen in 10 and 11 patients respectively. The cystic duct was short and wide in 13 (31%) patients. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 6 (14%) patients. The median duration of postprocedural hospital stay was 1 (0-13) day. Three patients had tandem ESE-LC on a day-care basis. One patient had post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography pancreatitis, and another required percutaneous drainage for gall bladder fossa collection. No patient had retained CBDS at a median follow-up of 18 (3-28) months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tandem ESE-LC is safe and effective method in managing concomitant GSD and CBDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肝硬化患者中,胃肠道念珠菌病通常被忽视,并且可能是严重的感染。因此,我们评估了患病率,危险因素,和肝硬化食管念珠菌病(EC)的结果,并进行了系统评价,以总结EC在肝硬化中的可用证据。
    方法:在2019年1月至2020年3月期间,在三级护理机构连续接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的肝硬化患者进行了EC(病例)筛查。根据EGD发现和/或刷子细胞学诊断出EC。对照组(无EC)随机招募,在病例和对照组之间比较EC的危险因素和结局。搜索了四个电子数据库,以进行描述肝硬化中EC的研究。在随机效应荟萃分析中汇总了EC的患病率估计值,异质性通过I2进行评估。使用患病率研究清单来评估研究中的偏倚风险。
    结果:在2762例肝硬化患者中有100例(3.6%)被诊断为EC。EC患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)较高(12.4vs.11.2;P=0.007),慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)(26%vs.10%;P=0.003)和伴随的细菌感染(24%vs.7%;P=0.001),与对照组相比。多变量模型,包括最近的酗酒,肝细胞癌(HCC),上消化道(UGI)出血,ACLF,糖尿病,MELD,预测肝硬化中EC的发展具有出色的辨别能力(C指数:0.918)。6%的病例发展为侵袭性疾病,并伴有多器官衰竭,4例EC患者在随访中死亡。在确定的236篇文章中,来自8项研究(均具有低偏倚风险)的EC合并患病率为2.1%(95%CI:0.8-5.8)。肝硬化的危险因素和结果未在文献中报道。
    结论:EC不是肝硬化患者的罕见感染,它可能易患侵袭性念珠菌病和过早死亡。酗酒,HCC,UGI出血,ACLF,糖尿病,较高的MELD是肝硬化中EC的独立预测因子。有肝硬化或有吞咽症状的高危患者应迅速筛查并治疗EC。
    BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal candidiasis is often neglected and potentially serious infection in cirrhosis patients. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of esophageal candidiasis (EC) in cirrhotics and did a systematic review to summarize EC\'s available evidence in cirrhosis.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis posted for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a tertiary care institute were screened for EC (cases) between January 2019 and March 2020. EC was diagnosed on EGD findings and/or brush cytology. Controls (without EC) were recruited randomly, and EC\'s risk factors and outcomes were compared between cases and controls.Four electronic databases were searched for studies describing EC in cirrhosis. Prevalence estimates of EC were pooled on random-effects meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed by I2. A checklist for prevalence studies was used to evaluate the risk of bias in studies.
    RESULTS: EC was diagnosed in 100 of 2762 patients with cirrhosis (3.6%). Patients with EC had a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (12.4 vs. 11.2; P = 0.007), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) (26% vs. 10%; P = 0.003) and concomitant bacterial infections (24% vs. 7%; P = 0.001), as compared with controls. A multivariable model, including recent alcohol binge, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed, ACLF, diabetes, and MELD, predicted EC\'s development in cirrhosis with excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.918). Six percent of cases developed the invasive disease and worsened with multiorgan failures, and four patients with EC died on follow-up.Of 236 articles identified, EC\'s pooled prevalence from 8 studies (all with low-risk of bias) was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.8-5.8). Risk factors and outcomes of EC in cirrhosis were not reported in the literature.
    CONCLUSIONS: EC is not a rare infection in cirrhosis patients, and it may predispose to invasive candidiasis and untimely deaths. Alcohol binge, HCC, UGI bleed, ACLF, diabetes, and higher MELD are the independent predictors of EC in cirrhosis. At-risk patients with cirrhosis or those with deglutition symptoms should be rapidly screened and treated for EC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肝衰竭(ALF)是罕见的,不可预测的,各种病因导致的急性肝损伤(ALI)的潜在致命并发症。文献中报道的ALF病因具有区域差异,影响临床表现和自然病程。在旨在反映印度临床实践的共识文章的这一部分中,疾病负担,流行病学,临床表现,监测,和预测已经讨论过了。在印度,病毒性肝炎是ALF的最常见原因,抗结核药物引起的药物性肝炎是第二常见的原因。ALF的临床表现以黄疸为特征,凝血病,和脑病。区分ALF和其他肝衰竭的原因是很重要的,包括慢性急性肝衰竭,亚急性肝功能衰竭,以及某些可以模仿这种表现的热带感染。该疾病通常具有暴发性临床过程,短期死亡率很高。死亡通常归因于脑部并发症,感染,导致多器官衰竭。及时肝移植(LT)可以改变结果,因此,在可以安排LT之前,为患者提供重症监护至关重要。评估预后以选择适合LT的患者同样重要。已经提出了几个预后评分,他们的比较表明,本土开发的动态分数比西方世界描述的分数更具优势。ALF的管理将在本文件的第2部分中描述。
    Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号