Rotator cuff repair

肩袖修复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肩袖损伤的临床和动物研究中,功能评估对于评估治疗结果至关重要。虽然步态分析通常用于评估肩袖撕裂的动物模型,它与人类患者的相关性较小,因为人类肩部通常是在非负重状态下评估的。本研究介绍了熟练的触角测试作为大鼠肩部功能评估工具,这允许评估没有承重。
    方法:在对照组中,8只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠接受了无修复的肩袖撕裂手术。在肩袖修复组中,20只大鼠在肩袖撕裂后4周接受肩袖修复。对于熟练的触达测试,训练大鼠伸展前肢以获取食物颗粒,以及试验的数量,记录了尝试次数和成功率。在基线时进行步态分析和熟练到达测试,撕裂后4周,修复后1、2、4和8周。重复测量方差分析用于评估时间对肩关节功能的影响。显著性水平设定为0.05。
    结果:熟练的测试需要216小时才能进行,而步态分析需要44小时。在肩袖修复组中,步态表现在修复后1周显著恶化,在修复后4周恢复至撕裂后4周水平。关于熟练的触达测试,尝试的次数,修复后1周的试验数量和成功率下降.随后,修复后2周观察到性能短暂反弹,随后,尝试和试验的数量持续下降。修复后8周,只有成功率恢复到与撕裂后4周相似的水平.
    结论:熟练的伸手测试可以检测肩袖撕裂和修复后的功能缺陷,虽然它需要很高的时间和劳动力成本。
    BACKGROUND: Functional assessments are crucial to evaluate treatment outcomes in clinical and animal studies on rotator cuff injuries. While gait analysis is commonly used to assess animal models of rotator cuff tears, it is less relevant for human patients as the human shoulder is typically assessed in a non-weight-bearing condition. The present study introduces the skilled reaching test as a shoulder functional assessment tool for rats, which allows for evaluation without weight bearing.
    METHODS: In the control group, 8 male Sprague-Dawley rats received rotator cuff tear surgery without repair. In the rotator cuff repair group, 20 rats received rotator cuff repair at 4 weeks post rotator cuff tear. For the skilled reaching test, rats were trained to extend their forelimbs to fetch food pellets, and the number of trials, number of attempts and the success rate were recorded. The gait analysis and skilled reaching test were performed at baseline, 4 weeks post-tear, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-repair. The repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of time on the shoulder function. The significance level was set at 0.05.
    RESULTS: The skilled reaching test required 216 h to conduct, while the gait analysis took 44 h. In the rotator cuff repair group, gait performance significantly deteriorated at 1 week post-repair and restored to 4 weeks post-tear levels at 4 weeks post-repair. Regarding the skilled reaching test, the number of attempts, number of trials and the success rate decreased at 1 week post-repair. Subsequently, there was a brief rebound in performance observed at 2 weeks post-repair, followed by a continued decline in the number of attempts and trials. By 8 weeks post-repair, only the success rate had restored to levels similar to those observed at 4 weeks post-tear.
    CONCLUSIONS: The skilled reaching test can detect functional deficiencies following rotator cuff tear and repair, while it requires high time and labour costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,阿片类药物的过度处方会增加阿片类药物依赖的风险,用药过量,和死亡。骨科肩关节手术围手术期和术后阿片类药物使用的增加是长期阿片类药物依赖的重要危险因素。作者假设,针对大型肩部手术的多学科围手术期疼痛管理计划(过渡性疼痛服务或TPS)将导致术后所需阿片类药物的减少。
    方法:退伍军人事务医疗中心实施了一项TPS,重点是非阿片类药物疼痛管理和戒烟支持。将TPS实施期间的阿片类药物消费与历史队列进行了比较。包括所有接受肩关节成形术或肩袖修复的患者。主要结果是术后90天继续使用阿片类药物的患者比例。次要结果包括术后疼痛评分,阿片类药物停止的时间,和90天消耗的阿片类药物片剂中位数。建立了多变量模型来预测术后90天的阿片类药物总使用量。计算到阿片类药物停止的时间的KaplanMeier曲线。
    结果:TPS组显示出院后90天持续使用阿片类药物减少(12.6%vs.28.6%;p=0.018)。与90天阿片类药物总处方增加相关的独立预测因素包括住院时间(β=19.17),焦虑诊断(β=37.627),以及出院时处方的片剂数量(β=1.353)。与袖带修复(RCR)相比,肩关节成形术(TSA)与90天阿片类药物利用率降低(β=-32.535)相关。与RCR(8天)相比,TSA(6天)的中位停止时间较短。与人群平均值相比,TSA在出院后第2天和RCR在出院后第7天疼痛评分降低。在RCR和TSA手术组(180MME)中,TPS管理下消耗的出院后阿片类药物片剂(羟考酮5mg)的中位数为25。
    结论:这项研究表明,与历史对照相比,TPS减少了接受肩关节成形术或袖带修复的患者在90天的阿片类药物使用量。多变量回归表明,出院时阿片类药物片剂的减少是一个可改变的因素,可能有助于减少阿片类药物的消耗和焦虑诊断,停留时间增加,和袖带修复手术是与阿片类药物消耗增加独立相关的其他因素.这些数据将帮助外科医生为患者提供咨询,设定麻醉品使用预期,并尽量减少过度开药。使用类似的多学科围手术期疼痛管理计划可能会在全国范围内大大减少阿片类药物的处方。
    BACKGROUND: Over-prescription of opioids in the United States increases risks of opioid dependence, overdose, and death. Increased perioperative and postoperative opioid use during orthopedic shoulder surgery is a significant risk factor for long term opioid dependence. The authors hypothesized that a multidisciplinary perioperative pain management program (Transitional Pain Service or TPS) for major shoulder surgery would lead to a reduced amount of opioids required postoperatively.
    METHODS: A TPS was implemented at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center focused on non-opioid pain management and cessation support. Opioid consumption during the implementation of the TPS was compared to a historical cohort. All patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients continuing opioid use at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, time to opioid cessation, and median opioid tablets consumed at 90-days. A multivariable model was developed to predict total opioid use at 90-days postoperatively. Kaplan Meier curves were calculated for time to opioid cessation.
    RESULTS: The TPS group demonstrated decreased persistent opioid use at 90 days post-discharge (12.6% vs. 28.6%; p=0.018). Independent predictors associated with increased total opioid tablet prescriptions at 90 days included length of stay (β=19.17), anxiety diagnosis (β=37.627), and number of tablets prescribed at discharge (β=1.353). Shoulder arthroplasty surgery (TSA) was associated with decreased 90-day opioid utilization (β= -32.535) when compared to cuff repair (RCR). Median time to cessation was shorter in TSA (6 days) when compared with RCR (8 days). Pain scores were reduced compared to population mean by post-discharge day 2 for TSA and by post-discharge day 7 for RCR. Median number of post-discharge opioid tablets (oxycodone 5 mg) consumed under TPS management was 25 in both RCR and TSA surgery groups (180 MME).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a TPS reduces the amount of opioid use of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or cuff repair at 90 days when compared with a historical control. Multivariable regression indicated that fewer opioid tablets at discharge was a modifiable factor that may aid in reducing opioid consumption and that anxiety diagnosis, increased length of stay, and cuff repair surgery were other factors independently associated with increased opioid consumption. This data will assist surgeons in counseling patients, setting narcotic use expectations, and minimizing overprescribing. Use of a similar multidisciplinary perioperative pain management program may greatly reduce opioid over prescriptions nationally.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肩袖撕裂(RCT)是肩痛和功能障碍的主要原因。对于那些最初保守治疗失败的人,可以进行手术干预。肩袖修复(RCR)后一个重要且常见的并发症是再撕裂或不愈合。已经研究了对传统缝合线RCR的许多增强。其中,Smith+NephewRegeneten生物诱导性胶原蛋白贴片有希望的初步结果;然而,缺乏使用的分析数据,并且没有荟萃分析将可用数据与历史RCR结果进行比较。
    方法:使用OvidMEDLINE进行了PRISMA指导的文献检索,PubMED,科克伦,和ClinicalTrials.gov.13项研究符合纳入和排除标准。仅包括关于完全和部分厚度泪液的临床试验。美国肩肘外科评分(ASES),Constant-Murley评分(CMS),疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS),最小临床重要差异(MCID),肌腱厚度,并发症发生率是感兴趣的主要结局.进行荟萃分析以确定纳入研究的总体并发症和再撕裂率。
    结果:结果,CMS,在所有报道它们的研究中,VAS显著改善,大多数患者达到MCID。患者报告的结果测量(PROM)改善与标准RCR的历史改善相似,标准修复后达到MCID的患者比例相似。肌腱厚度显著改善并且达到与标准RCR相似的程度。用生物诱导补片增加全厚度RCR后的总再撕裂率为8.3%。对于局部厚度RCR,所有患者的总再撕率为1.1%。在所有全厚度RCR研究中,生物诱导性贴片的总并发症发生率为15.5%,部分厚度RCR为16.2%。我们发现,与传统修复相比,使用生物诱导性补片增强后的总体再撕裂率较低;然而,全层泪液的总并发症发生率相似,部分层泪液的总并发症发生率更高.最后,生物诱导贴片的不良反应为0.2%.
    结论:生物诱导性胶原补片似乎是肩袖修复的安全增强剂。患者可能会经历PROM的显着主观改善和肌腱厚度的显着增加。几十年来,在RCR之后,修复率一直是一个令人担忧的问题,生物诱导贴片可能有助于减轻这种风险。缺乏将生物诱导贴片与传统缝线RCR进行比较的病例对照研究。需要这些数据来更好地确定生物诱导贴片在治疗全厚度和部分厚度肩袖修复中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a prevalent cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. For those who fail initial conservative treatment, operative intervention can be pursued. A significant and common complication after rotator cuff repair (RCR) is retearing or non-healing. Numerous augmentations to traditional suture RCR have been studied. Of these, the Smith+Nephew Regeneten bioinductive collagen patch has had promising initial results; however, analytic data for its use is lacking, and there is no meta-analysis comparing the available data to historical RCR outcomes.
    METHODS: A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. 13 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only clinical trials on full and partial-thickness tears were included. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score (ASES), Constant-Murley score (CMS), the visual analog scale for pain (VAS), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), tendon thickness, and complication rates were primary outcomes of interest. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the overall complication and retear rate from the included studies.
    RESULTS: ASES, CMS, and VAS improved significantly in all studies that reported them, and most patients achieved MCID. Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) improvements were similar to historical improvements in standard RCR, and a similar proportion of patients achieved MCID after standard repair. Tendon thickness improved significantly and to a similar degree as standard RCR. Overall retear rate after full thickness RCR augmented with the bioinductive patch was 8.3%. For partial thickness RCR, total retear rate of 1.1% across all patients. The overall complication rate with the bioinductive patch was 15.5% across all full-thickness RCR studies and 16.2% in partial thickness RCR. We found overall retear rate to be lower after augmentation with the bioinductive patch compared to traditional repair; however, the overall complication rate was similar for full-thickness tears and higher for partial-thickness tears. Lastly, adverse reactions to the bioinductive patch were noted at 0.2%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The bioinductive collagen patch appears to be a safe augmentation for rotator cuff repair. Patients are likely to experience significant subjective improvement in PROMs and significant increases in tendon thickness. Retear rate has been a concern after RCR for decades, and the bioinductive patch may help mitigate this risk. There is a lack of case-control studies comparing the bioinductive patch to traditional suture RCR. Such data is needed to better determine the role of the bioinductive patch in the treatment of full and partial-thickness rotator cuff repairs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨关节镜下肩峰下球囊置入治疗肩袖大面积撕裂(MRCT)的疗效,评估患者满意度,结果,肩部功能,疼痛评分,首次手术后8年的免修正生存率。
    方法:在这项前瞻性数据收集的回顾性研究中,前瞻性纳入2014~2017年接受球囊置入的MRCT患者.在至少5年的随访中对其结果进行回顾性分析。人口统计,患者满意度,重新操作,并记录了并发症。计算SF-12评分和Constant-Murley评分(CMS)子评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。手术前和手术后的测量进行统计学比较,以进行解剖和功能评估。
    结果:在一项最初有61名参与者的研究中,10人在3年内失去随访。在剩下的51人中,有9人在最新的后续行动中丢失了。队列(42名参与者,平均年龄63.17±7.66岁)监测83.98±9.50个月。七名与会者要求在两年内进行修订,导致83.33%的无修订生存率。从术前到最近的随访观察到显著的改善:肩眼肱骨间隔减少(7.83至6.56,p=0.004),临界肩角增加(36.10至38.24,p=0.001),骨关节炎等级增加(1.45至2.81,p=0.001),SF-12体质评分提高(27.40至37.69,p=0.001),Constant-Murley总分增加(26.50至68.69,p=0.001)。Constant-Murley总得分的MCID为11.78分。在那些没有修订的人中,满意率为11.43%,57.14%满意,31.43%的人不满意。
    结论:在5年的随访中,使用球囊垫片进行MRCT可获得中等满意度,在头两年内具有稳定的修订率。值得注意的是,低翻修手术率,高无修订生存,在至少5年的随访中,通过关节镜下肩峰下球囊置入术,并结合二头肌肌腱切开术和肩峰下滑囊切除术进行MRCT,观察到肩部功能显着改善。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial balloon placement for massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT), assessing patient satisfaction, outcomes, shoulder functionality, pain scores, and revision-free survivorship up to eight years post the initial surgery.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study with prospective data collection, patients with MRCTs undergoing balloon placement from 2014 to 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Their outcomes were analyzed retrospectively over a minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographics, patient satisfaction, reoperations, and complications were documented. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated for SF-12 scores and Constant-Murley score (CMS) sub-scores. Pre- and post-surgery measures statistically compared for anatomical and functional evaluations.
    RESULTS: In a study with 61 participants initially, 10 were lost to follow-up over 3 years. Of the remaining 51, 9 were lost at the latest follow-up. The cohort (42 participants, mean age 63.17 ± 7.66 years) was monitored for 83.98 ± 9.50 months. Seven participants required revisions within two years, resulting in an 83.33% revision-free survival rate. Significant improvements were observed from preoperative to latest follow-up: acromiohumeral interval decreased (7.83 to 6.56, p = 0.004), critical shoulder angle increased (36.10 to 38.24, p = 0.001), osteoarthritis grade increased (1.45 to 2.81, p = 0.001), SF-12 physical score improved (27.40 to 37.69, p = 0.001), and Constant-Murley total scores increased (26.50 to 68.69, p = 0.001). MCID for total Constant-Murley scores was 11.78 points. Among those without revisions, satisfaction rates were 11.43% excellent, 57.14% satisfied, and 31.43% dissatisfied.
    CONCLUSIONS: Employing a balloon spacer for MRCTs yielded moderate satisfaction at the 5-year follow-up, with stable revision rates within the first 2 years. Notably, low revision surgery rates, high revision-free survival, and significant shoulder functionality improvements were observed at a minimum 5-year follow-up with arthroscopic subacromial balloon placement in conjunction with biceps tenotomy and subacromial bursectomy for MRCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:手术修复时机对创伤性和非创伤性肩袖损伤(RCI)结局的影响仍然难以捉摸。因此,本研究旨在比较不同时间点创伤性和非创伤性RCI修复后结局的差异.
    方法:研究人群包括87例创伤性和非创伤性RCI患者,他们接受了关节镜肩袖修复,并随访至少6个月。接下来,根据损伤时间(早期修复:3个月内发生;延迟修复:3个月后发生),将创伤组和非创伤组分为亚组.比较手术干预前后的测量结果,以评估RCI持续时间对创伤和非创伤组患者功能状态的影响。主要评价指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分,美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分,肩关节功能评分恒定,和加州大学,洛杉矶(UCLA)肩膀得分。次要评价指标包括肩部活动范围(ROM),术后肩袖再撕裂率,和接头刚度的发生率。
    结果:在创伤组的40例患者中,22人接受了早期修复,而其余18人接受了延迟修复。在由47名患者组成的非创伤组中,18人接受了早期修复,而其余29人接受了延迟修复。最短临床随访时间为6个月,平均随访10.2个月。术后随访期间,创伤组中有1例和6例接受早期和延迟修复的患者经历了再撕裂,分别。相反,3和8例接受早期和延迟修复的患者在非创伤组中出现了再撕裂,分别。
    结论:创伤性RCI的早期修复产生了更好的结果,包括改进的运动范围,较低的疼痛症状,与延迟修复相比,术后再撕裂的风险较低。此外,非手术治疗被推荐为非创伤性RCI患者的首选治疗方法.
    BACKGROUND: The effects of the timing of surgical repair on the outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries (RCI) remain elusive. Thus, this study aimed to compare differences in outcomes following the repair of traumatic and non-traumatic RCI at varying time points.
    METHODS: The study population comprised 87 patients with traumatic and non-traumatic RCI who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Next, the trauma and the non-trauma groups were stratified into subgroups according to the time of injury (early repair: occurring within 3 months; delayed repair: occurring after 3 months). Measurements before and after surgical interventions were compared to evaluate the effect of the duration of RCI on the functional status of patients in the trauma and non-trauma groups. Primary evaluation indices included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant shoulder function score, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Secondary evaluation indices consisted of shoulder range of motion (ROM), postoperative rotator cuff retear rate, and incidence of joint stiffness.
    RESULTS: Among the 40 patients in the trauma group, 22 underwent early repair, whereas the remaining 18 underwent delayed repair. In the non-trauma group consisting of 47 patients, 18 underwent early repair, whereas the remaining 29 underwent delayed repair. The minimum clinical follow-up time was 6 months, with an average follow-up time of 10.2 months. During postoperative follow-up, 1 and 6 patients who underwent early and delayed repair experienced re-tear in the trauma group, respectively. Contrastingly, 3 and 8 patients who underwent early and delayed repair presented with re-tear in the non-trauma group, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early repair of traumatic RCI yielded superior outcomes, including improved range of motion, lower pain symptoms, and lower risk of postoperative re-tears compared to delayed repair. Additionally, non-surgical treatment is recommended as the preferred approach for patients with non-traumatic RCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:最近的研究表明,心理因素和睡眠质量在外科手术的结果中起作用。包括骨科手术.本研究的目的是评估术前抑郁之间可能的相关性,焦虑,接受肩袖修复(RCR)的患者的睡眠质量和术后6个月的功能评分。方法:纳入研究的所有患者术前进行医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷及36项简短健康调查(SF-36),牛津肩评分(OSS),肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和PSQI问卷在术后6个月随访。共有47名患者被纳入分析。结果:术前焦虑组和非焦虑组之间在术后SF-36物理成分总结(PCS)和心理成分总结(MCS)评分以及PSQI评分方面存在统计学上的显着差异。术前抑郁评分与术后预后指标的相关性表明,术前HADS-D评分与6个月PCS之间存在强正相关,MCS,和OSS分数。术前睡眠质量与术后结局指标的相关性表明,术前PSQI评分与6个月MCS评分之间存在强正相关。结论:焦虑患者术后RCR结果较差。抑郁症可能受到与RC病理学相关的因素的影响;然而,没有统计学上显著的相关性。睡眠质量通常在术后改善,术前睡眠不良与预后不良之间没有显著关联.
    Background/Objectives: Recent studies imply that psychological factors and sleep quality play a role in the outcomes of surgical procedures, including in orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate possible correlations between preoperative depression, anxiety, and quality of sleep and functional 6-month postoperative scores in patients having undergone rotator cuff repair (RCR). Methods: All patients included in the study performed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaires preoperatively and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and PSQI questionnaires at the six-month postoperative follow-up. A total of 47 patients were included in the analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences between preoperative anxious and not-anxious groups were found in the postoperative SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and PSQI score. The correlation of the preoperative depression score to postoperative outcome measures revealed a strong positive correlation between the preoperative HADS-D score and the 6-month PCS, MCS, and OSS scores. The correlation of preoperative sleep quality to postoperative outcome measures revealed a strong positive correlation between the preoperative PSQI score and 6-month MCS score. Conclusions: Anxious patients had worse postoperative RCR outcomes. Depression may be influenced by factors related to RC pathology; however, there were no statistically significant correlations. Sleep quality generally improves postoperatively, and no significant association was found between bad preoperative sleepers and worse outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究表明,低的术前弹性可能会导致关节镜肩袖修复后的不良结果。因此,本系统综述的目的是评估术前患者的韧性是否与结局指标相关,包括患者报告的结果测量(PROM)和睡眠质量,关节镜肩袖修复后。要进行审查,根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,使用PubMed和Embase数据库进行文献检索,收集与术前复原力对肩袖修复术后结局影响相关的研究.使用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。纳入了7项584名患者的研究。在总共36个报告的术后结果中,包括PROM和睡眠质量,14与较高的术前韧性呈显著正相关。一项研究报告说,在两周的随访中,较高的弹性与较差的睡眠质量显着相关,但在长达24周的进一步随访中却没有。在五项研究中评估了具有不同弹性水平的患者之间的结果显着差异,所有这些研究发现,具有较高弹性的患者在不同术前弹性水平的患者之间具有显著更好的结局或无显著差异.在没有研究报告中,低弹性患者有更好的结果。总的来说,所有报告的术后结局数据中约有一半与术前复原力显著相关.因此,临床医师应先发制人识别低弹性患者,并实施心理干预措施,以限制关节镜肩袖修复术后不良结局.
    Recent studies have shown that low preoperative resilience may lead to inferior outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether preoperative patient resilience is associated with outcome measures, including patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and sleep quality, following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. To perform the review, a literature search was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases to gather studies related to the influence of preoperative resilience on postoperative outcomes of rotator cuff repair. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). Seven studies with 584 patients were included. Of 36 total reported postoperative outcomes, including PROMs and sleep quality, 14 had a significant positive correlation with higher preoperative resilience. One study reported that higher resilience was significantly correlated with worse sleep quality at a two-week follow-up but not at further follow-ups of up to 24 weeks. Significant differences in outcomes between patients with varying levels of resilience were assessed in five studies, all of which found that patients with higher resilience had significantly better outcomes or no significant differences in outcomes between patients with varying levels of preoperative resilience. In no study was it reported that patients with low resilience had better outcomes. Overall, approximately half of all reported postoperative outcome data was found to be significantly associated with preoperative resilience. Therefore, clinicians should preemptively identify those with low resilience and administer psychological interventions to limit inferior outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肩膀是身体中活动最多的关节,经常受伤。应用的手术治疗,手术后的肩部保护,在日常生活活动(ADLs)中使用肩部的护理和渐进的锻炼计划对恢复过程都至关重要。本研究调查了视频辅助训练(VAT)对肩袖修复(RCR)后上肢并发症和功能的影响。
    包含在此前瞻性中,平行双臂,随机对照研究是一个实验组(n:24),接受VAT详细说明RCR的早期术后护理和执行ADL的说明,可以使用90天的渐进锻炼计划,和接受常规护理的对照组(n:24)。主要结果是上肢问题和功能,根据手臂残疾评估,肩和手(DASH)和修改后的Constant-Murley评分(MCM),而次要结局是过去3个月内出现的并发症.结果在基线测量,在六周和三个月后。
    3个月后,两组的DASH-Work(p=0.001)和MCMADLs评分(p=0.003)有统计学意义的差异,以及与初始测量相比,两组量表得分的显着变化。VAT组中只有1例患者在RCR后1个月出现并发症;两组的并发症没有显着差异(p=0.235)。
    VAT可以增加RCR患者的功能。医疗保健专业人员,尤其是护士,可以使用VAT方法改善RCR后患者的肩关节功能。
    UNASSIGNED: The shoulder is the most mobile joint in the body, and is frequently exposed to injuries. The applied surgical treatments, protection of the shoulder after surgery, care in the use of the shoulder in activities of daily living (ADLs) and gradual exercise programs are all vital to the recovery process. The present study investigates the effect of video-assisted training (VAT) on upper extremity complications and functions after rotator cuff repair (RCR).
    UNASSIGNED: Included in this prospective, parallel two-armed, randomized controlled study were an experimental group (n: 24) that received VAT detailing early postoperative care for RCR and instructions on performing ADLs, and that had access to a 90-day gradual exercise program, and a control group (n: 24) that received routine care. The primary outcomes were upper extremity problems and functions, as assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and modified Constant-Murley scores (MCM), while secondary outcomes were complications that had developed within the past three months. The outcomes were measured at baseline, after six weeks and at three months.
    UNASSIGNED: After 3 months, a statistically significant difference was noted in the DASH-Work (p = 0.001) and MCM ADLs scores (p = 0.003) of the two groups, and significant changes in which the scale scores of both groups when compared to the initial measurement. Only one patient in the VAT group developed complications after RCR at one month; there were no significant differences in the complications of the two groups (p = 0.235).
    UNASSIGNED: VAT can increase function in RCR patients. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can use the VAT method to improve shoulder function in patients after RCR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析肩袖修补术加肱二头肌长头肌(LHB)上囊重建(SCR)的患者愈合和再破裂病变的临床一年演变。此外,比较男人和女人之间的这种演变。
    方法:在2021年2月至2022年6月期间,对接受肩袖修复加SCR和LHB的患者进行了一项初步研究。手术一年后,所有患者均使用磁共振成像(MRI)完成了术前和术后一年的肌腱撕裂类型和肌腱完整性评估。此外,通过美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分,疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Constant评分评估功能.
    结果:共有38名患者完成了为期一年的最终评估,他们在Constant和ASES量表中的功能得分分别提高到83和86(p<.001),分别。此外,84%的患者出现愈合的袖带,16%的患者发生了再破裂。在总的Constant评分中,愈合和再破裂患者之间存在差异,随着力量分量表的显着增加,袖口愈合的患者几乎翻了一番(p<.001);同样,日常生活活动评分,平衡子量表增加了,而愈合袖带组疼痛评分下降(p<0.05)。男性和女性的功能没有差异(p>0.05)。此外,几乎所有患者在ASES和Constant总分中均达到MCID,与治疗组无关。
    结论:使用SCR和LHB的袖带修复在一年的随访后实现了较低的再破裂百分比和功能改善。与袖带再净化患者相比,治愈病变的患者在日常生活活动中表现出更大的力量和更好的表现。因此,SCRLHB手术可以被认为是男性和女性肩袖修复手术的有效技术。尽管需要与对照组进行比较以证实这些发现。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical one-year evolution of healed and rerupture lesions in patients who received a rotator cuff repair plus Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps (LHB). Moreover, to compare this evolution between men and women.
    METHODS: A pilot study was conducted on patients who underwent a rotator cuff repair plus SCR with LHB between February 2021 and June 2022. All patients completed pre-operative and one-year post-operative evaluations for tendon type of tear and tendon integrity using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)after one year of the surgery. Besides, functionality was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the visual analog scale for pain (VAS); and the Constant score.
    RESULTS: A total of 38 patients completed the one-year final evaluation, they presented an increased functionality score to 83 and 86 in Constant and ASES scales (p < .001), respectively. Besides, 84% of the patients presented a healed cuff, while rerupture occurred in 16% of the patients. There were differences between the healed and rerupture patients in the total Constant score, with a remarkable increase in the strength subscale, almost double for patients with healed cuff (p < .001); in the same way, daily life activity score, and balance subscale increased, while pain score decreased in the healed cuff group (p < .05). There was no difference in functionality between men and women (p > .05). Besides, almost all patients achieved the MCID in both ASES and Constant total scores, irrespectively of the healing group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The cuff repair using SCR with the LHB achieved a low percentage of rerupture and a functional improvement after one year of follow-up. Patients who healed the lesion presented more strength and better performance in daily life activities than those with cuff repurture. Thus, SCR + LHB procedure can be considered an efficient technique for rotator cuff repair surgery for both men and women. Although a comparison with a control group is needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨髓刺激(BMS),涉及在大结节中创建多个通道的程序,通常与关节镜肩袖修复(ARCR)一起进行。本研究评估了BMS对ARCR后临床和结构结果的影响。
    方法:本研究纳入204例患者,中等,和大的全厚度肩袖撕裂。总之,103名接受BMS和ARCR的患者组成了BMS组,而仅接受ARCR的101例患者随机组成对照组。在3个月前和3个月时评估临床和功能结果,6个月,1年,手术2年后,使用诸如运动范围之类的参数,功能评分(ASES和恒定评分),和临床评分(VAS)。术后6个月和2年也通过超声检查肌腱完整性。
    结果:两组在活动范围方面无显著差异,功能评分(ASES评分和恒定评分),术后2年的临床评分(VAS)(均p>0.05)。同样,肩袖再撕裂率,使用超声检查评估术后2年以上的肌腱完整性检查,组间无显著差异(均P>0.05)。
    结论:BMS组和对照组在功能评分和临床结局方面没有显著差异。Further,术后肌腱完整性无显著差异.因此,纳入或排除BMS预计不会影响ARCR患者的术后结局,中等,或大的肩袖撕裂。
    BACKGROUND: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS), a procedure involving the creation of multiple channels in the greater tuberosity, is often performed alongside arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study evaluated the effect of BMS on clinical and structural outcomes following ARCR.
    METHODS: This study involved 204 patients with small, medium, and large full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In all, 103 patients who underwent BMS and ARCR made up the BMS group, while the 101 patients who only had ARCR made up the control group with randomization. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed before and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, using parameters such as range of motion, functional scores (ASES and constant score), and clinical scores (VAS). Tendon integrity was also examined postoperatively via ultrasound at 6 months and 2 years.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning range of motion, functional scores (ASES score and constant score), and clinical score (VAS) during the 2-year post-surgery period (all p>0.05). Similarly, the rotator cuff retear rate, as assessed using ultrasonographic tendon integrity checks over 2 years post-surgery, did not significantly vary between the groups (all p>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant disparities in functional scores and clinical outcomes between the BMS and control groups. Further, no significant differences were observed in tendon integrity post-surgery. Therefore, the inclusion or exclusion of BMS is not anticipated to influence the postoperative outcome in ARCR for patients with small, medium, or large rotator cuff tears.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号