Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) often need platelet transfusions to address thrombocytopenia. The risk of alloimmunization, particularly in Rhesus (Rh) incompatibility between donors and recipients during platelet transfusions, is heightened, especially with whole blood-derived pooled platelets as opposed to apheresis platelets. Although the occurrence of alloimmunization from platelet transfusions is minimal, there is an ongoing debate about whether Rh immune globulin (RhIg) should be administered to Rhesus D (RhD)-negative recipients of RhD-positive platelet units. We present a unique case of anti-D alloimmunization in a 56-year-old patient with underlying MDS following multiple platelet transfusions but never received packed cell transfusion or anti-D immunoglobulin. Some studies advocate for RhIg administration in specific scenarios and for certain patient populations. This case underscores the importance of considering Rhesus compatibility or administering anti-D immunoglobulin in cases where frequent platelet transfusions are required.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of DNT, a rare partial D, can be challenging, as it is difficult to distinguish from D+. This study aimed to identify DNT individuals by analyzing the DNT proband\'s family members, characterize DNT, and propose management strategies.
METHODS: Family members of the first Korean DNT proband were recruited. RHD genotyping was conducted, and weak D tests were carried out using several anti-D reagents.
RESULTS: Three DNT individuals were identified among 6 family members, including 1 with an anti-D alloantibody. As DNT red cells exhibited strong reactivity with all anti-D clones, DNT was serologically indistinguishable from D+. Moreover, unusual serologic findings in DNT individuals only became apparent after anti-D alloimmunization.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend DNT individuals as candidates for Rh immune globulin prophylaxis during the perinatal period and transfusions with D- blood components. An anticipatory RHD genotyping is suggested for partial D family members to prevent potential partial D individuals from becoming alloimmunized.

To describe fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) during second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E) to evaluate if Rhesus-immune globulin (RhIG) 100 mcg (used in the United Kingdom) and 300 mcg (used in the United States) provide adequate prophylaxis.
We conducted an exploratory prospective descriptive study of women undergoing D&E between 15 weeks 0 days and 23 weeks 6 days of gestation. Enrolled participants had Kleihauer-Betke testing on specimens obtained before and after D&E. We assessed the main outcome measures of FMH in mL suggesting need for more than 100 mcg and 300 mcg RhIG (FMH of 10 mL and 30 mL fetal whole blood, respectively) and association of postprocedure FMH with demographic characteristics and procedure-related variables.
The 300 participants had a mean gestational age of 19 weeks 6 days±2 weeks 2 days. The median preprocedure FMH was 0 mL (range 0-50 mL) with 2 (0.67%) women exceeding 10 mL (19 mL and 50 mL). The median postprocedure FMH was 1 mL (range 0-60 mL). Almost all participants had postprocedure FMH <10 mL (n=295, 98.3%) and <30 mL (n=298, 99.3%). All participants under 18 weeks had FMH <10 mL. We found no demographic or procedure-related factors to be predictive of FMH quantity.
FMH occurring with routine second-trimester D&E procedures is minimal. Adequate prophylaxis with RhIG 100 mcg and 300 mcg occurred in >98% of women and in all cases <18 weeks of gestation. This study is the first step to potentially reducing the dose and costs of RhIG administration with D&E.
This study is a first step in quantifying fetomaternal hemorrhage with routine dilation and evacuation procedures; larger trials are needed, especially to understand why some women have recognizable hemorrhage preprocedure. If dosing requirements are too high with current guidelines, lower doses will result in resource and cost savings.

OBJECTIVE: To review the differential diagnosis and laboratory issues for women with a large calculated dose of Rh immune globulin (RhIG).
METHODS: A case-based approach is used to review the differential diagnosis of patients with a large calculated dose of RhIG, RhIG dosing for women with baseline elevations in hemoglobin F, the formulations of RhIG, and issues for the transfusion medicine service with the release of large doses of RhIG.
RESULTS: A large fetomaternal bleed after delivery requiring multiple doses of RhIG is rare. Such patients may require intravenous RhIG to avoid multiple injections. Patients with a large percentage of circulating fetal RBCs should be evaluated for a disorder of hemoglobin synthesis and, if present, should have quantification of the circulating fetal RBCs by flow cytometry.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate laboratory evaluation of women with large fetomaternal bleeds is essential for appropriate RhIG administration.