Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques

呼吸门控成像技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨基于呼吸门控(RG)PET/CT的影像组学特征与非门控(UG)PET/CT在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和良性病变鉴别诊断中的差异和诊断效能。
    方法:从2020年3月至2021年5月,117例疑似肺部病变的患者,并同意接受UGPET/CT和胸部RGPET/CT(包括基于相位的静止期门控,pQPG和相位匹配的4DPET/CT,4DRG)被前瞻性地包括在内。从每次扫描的PET图像中提取377个影像组学特征。使用配对t检验比较UG和RG特征以进行扫描间变异性分析。我们开发了三种具有UG和RG功能的影像组学模型(即UGModel,pQPGModel和4DRGModel)。ROC曲线用于比较诊断效率,通过5倍交叉验证进行模型级诊断价值比较.P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:共111例患者(平均年龄±标准差为59.1±11.6岁,范围,29-88y,分析了63例男性),209例肺部病变的特征变异性,并纳入了PET/CT之前未经治疗的91例患者中126例非转移病变的亚组进行了诊断分析。101/377(26.8%)的4DRG特征和82/377(21.8%)的pQPG特征与UG特征相比差异显著(均P<0.05)。其中61/377(16.2%)和59/377(15.6%)在恶性识别中表现出明显更好的判别能力(ΔAUC%(即(AUCRG-AUCUG)/AUCUG×100%)>0,P<0.05),分别。对于模型级别的比较,4DRG模型实现了最高的诊断效能(森73.2%,spe87.3%)与UGModel(森57.7%,spe76.4%)和pQPGModel(sen63.4%,spe81.8%)。
    结论:与UGPET/CT相比,RGPET/CT在肺部病变代谢异质性的定量评估以及NSCLC患者的后续诊断中表现更好。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated (RG) PET/CT based radiomics features compared to ungated (UG) PET/CT in the differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions.
    METHODS: 117 patients with suspected lung lesions from March 2020 to May 2021 and consent to undergo UG PET/CT and chest RG PET/CT (including phase-based quiescent period gating, pQPG and phase-matched 4D PET/CT, 4DRG) were prospectively included. 377 radiomics features were extracted from PET images of each scan. Paired t test was used to compare UG and RG features for inter-scan variability analysis. We developed three radiomics models with UG and RG features (i.e. UGModel, pQPGModel and 4DRGModel). ROC curves were used to compare diagnostic efficiencies, and the model-level comparison of diagnostic value was performed by five-fold cross-validation. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
    RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (average age ± standard deviation was 59.1 ± 11.6 y, range, 29 - 88 y, and 63 were males) with 209 lung lesions were analyzed for features variability and the subgroup of 126 non-metastasis lesions in 91 patients without treatment before PET/CT were included for diagnosis analysis. 101/377 (26.8 %) 4DRG features and 82/377 (21.8 %) pQPG features showed significant difference compared to UG features (both P<0.05). 61/377 (16.2 %) and 59/377 (15.6 %) of them showed significantly better discriminant ability (ΔAUC% (i.e. (AUCRG - AUCUG) / AUCUG×100 %) > 0 and P<0.05) in malignant recognition, respectively. For the model-level comparison, 4DRGModel achieved the highest diagnostic efficacy (sen 73.2 %, spe 87.3 %) compared with UGModel (sen 57.7 %, spe 76.4 %) and pQPGModel (sen 63.4 %, spe 81.8 %).
    CONCLUSIONS: RG PET/CT performs better in the quantitative assessment of metabolic heterogeneity for lung lesions and the subsequent diagnosis in patients with NSCLC compared with UG PET/CT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    T1加权(T1W)脉冲序列是腹部MRI临床方案中不可或缺的组成部分,但通常在检查过程中需要多次屏气(BHs)。并非所有患者都能维持。患者运动会影响T1W成像的质量,从而使关键诊断信息,如本征信号强度和对比度增强图像模式,无法确定。患者的运动对检查效率也有负面影响,由于多次获取尝试会延长检查的持续时间,并且通常保持无贡献。用于减轻T1W成像时的运动相关伪影的技术包括在一个BH内的多个动脉采集;具有呼吸门控或呼吸触发的自由呼吸;和径向成像采集技术,例如金角径向k空间采集(星堆)。虽然这些技术都有固有的优势和局限性,特定运动缓解技术的选择基于几个因素,包括正在调查的临床任务,下游技术后果,患者状况,和用户偏好。作者回顾了T1W序列腹部MRI中自由呼吸运动缓解技术的技术原理,提供已建立的临床应用的概述,并概述了这些技术的现有局限性。此外,针对BH能力有限的患者在临床情况下常见的腹部MRI方案策略提供了实践指导.还讨论了自由呼吸T1W成像在腹部MRI中的未来前景。©RSNA,2024请参见本期Fraum和An的特邀评论。
    T1-weighted (T1W) pulse sequences are an indispensable component of clinical protocols in abdominal MRI but usually require multiple breath holds (BHs) during the examination, which not all patients can sustain. Patient motion can affect the quality of T1W imaging so that key diagnostic information, such as intrinsic signal intensity and contrast enhancement image patterns, cannot be determined. Patient motion also has a negative impact on examination efficiency, as multiple acquisition attempts prolong the duration of the examination and often remain noncontributory. Techniques for mitigation of motion-related artifacts at T1W imaging include multiple arterial acquisitions within one BH; free breathing with respiratory gating or respiratory triggering; and radial imaging acquisition techniques, such as golden-angle radial k-space acquisition (stack-of-stars). While each of these techniques has inherent strengths and limitations, the selection of a specific motion-mitigation technique is based on several factors, including the clinical task under investigation, downstream technical ramifications, patient condition, and user preference. The authors review the technical principles of free-breathing motion mitigation techniques in abdominal MRI with T1W sequences, offer an overview of the established clinical applications, and outline the existing limitations of these techniques. In addition, practical guidance for abdominal MRI protocol strategies commonly encountered in clinical scenarios involving patients with limited BH abilities is rendered. Future prospects of free-breathing T1W imaging in abdominal MRI are also discussed. ©RSNA, 2024 See the invited commentary by Fraum and An in this issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    我们感谢ChangJS。对这篇文章感兴趣:“丹麦乳腺癌组织部分乳房照射试验中呼吸门控的益处”。作者的回应证实了ChangJS的陈述和评论。
    We appreciate Chang JS.\'s interest in the article: \"Benefit of respiratory gating in the Danish Breast Cancer Group partial breast irradiation trial\". The author\'s response corroborates the statements and comments of Chang JS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:呼吸运动对肺部肿瘤的放疗有重要影响。呼吸门控技术有助于提高目标描绘的准确性。这项研究调查了前瞻性和回顾性呼吸门控模拟在放射治疗中孤立性肺肿瘤(SPT)的目标描绘和放射治疗计划设计中的价值。
    方法:入选患者接受了三维(3D)CT无门CT模拟,前瞻性呼吸门控,和回顾性呼吸门控模拟。在三组CT图像上描绘了目标体积,并据此编制放疗计划。使用两种呼吸门控方法获得的肿瘤位移和移动信息,以及放疗计划中的靶区体积和剂量学参数进行了比较。
    结果:在使用两种门控方法测量的肿瘤位移中未观察到显着差异(p>0.05)。然而,内部总肿瘤体积(IGTV),内部目标体积(ITV),和基于回顾性呼吸门控模拟的计划目标体积(PTV)大于使用前瞻性门控获得的目标体积(A组:pIGTV=0.041,pITV=0.003,pPTV=0.008;B组:pIGTV=0.025,pITV=0.039,pPTV=0.004).双门控PTV均小于在3D非门控图像上描绘的那些(p<0.001)。V5Gy,V10Gy,V20Gy,V30Gy,两种门控放疗计划的平均肺剂量均低于3D非门控计划(p<0.001);两种门控方案之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。
    结论:应用呼吸门控可以降低靶体积和正常肺组织接受的辐射剂量。与前瞻性呼吸门控相比,回顾性门控提供了关于PTV中肿瘤运动的更多信息.
    OBJECTIVE: Respiratory movement has an important impact on the radiotherapy for lung tumor. Respiratory gating technology is helpful to improve the accuracy of target delineation. This study investigated the value of prospective and retrospective respiratory gating simulations in target delineation and radiotherapy plan design for solitary pulmonary tumors (SPTs) in radiotherapy.
    METHODS: The enrolled patients underwent CT simulation with three-dimensional (3D) CT non gating, prospective respiratory gating, and retrospective respiratory gating simulation. The target volumes were delineated on three sets of CT images, and radiotherapy plans were prepared accordingly. Tumor displacements and movement information obtained using the two respiratory gating approaches, as well as the target volumes and dosimetry parameters in the radiotherapy plan were compared.
    RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in tumor displacement measured using the two gating methods (p > 0.05). However, the internal gross tumor volumes (IGTVs), internal target volumes (ITVs), and planning target volumes (PTVs) based on the retrospective respiratory gating simulation were larger than those obtained using prospective gating (group A: pIGTV = 0.041, pITV = 0.003, pPTV = 0.008; group B: pIGTV = 0.025, pITV = 0.039, pPTV = 0.004). The two-gating PTVs were both smaller than those delineated on 3D non gating images (p < 0.001). V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, and mean lung dose in the two gated radiotherapy plans were lower than those in the 3D non gating plan (p < 0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the two gating plans (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of respiratory gating could reduce the target volume and the radiation dose that the normal lung tissue received. Compared to prospective respiratory gating, the retrospective gating provides more information about tumor movement in PTV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为呼吸门控放射治疗提出一种直接且时间有效的束时间延迟质量保证(QA)方法,并在典型的呼吸门控系统上验证所提出的方法,Catalyst™和AlignRT™。
    方法:QA装置由运动平台和嵌入金属球的Winston-Lutz立方体体模(WL3)组成。首先在CT-Sim和两种类型的QA计划中扫描该设备,该计划专门针对光束开启和光束关闭时间延迟,分别,是设计的。利用EPID获取WL3立方体的静态参考图像和运动测试图像。通过比较运动和参考图像中嵌入金属球的位置差异,确定了波束时间延迟。所提出的方法已在具有Catalyst™或AlignRT™呼吸门控系统的三个直线加速器上进行了验证。为了研究能量和剂量率对光束时间延迟的影响,使用Eclipse(V15.7)设计了一系列具有不同能量和剂量率的QA计划。
    结果:对于所有能量,AlignRT™V6.3.226、AlignRT™V7.1.1和Catalyst™中的光束时间延迟为92.13±$\\pm$5.79ms,123.11±$\\pm$6.44ms,和303.44±$\\pm$4.28ms,分别。AlignRT™V6.3.226、AlignRT™V7.1.1和Catalyst™中的波束关闭时间延迟为121.87±$\\pm$1.34ms,119.33±$\\pm$0.75ms,和97.69±$\\pm$2.02ms,分别。此外,随着所有门控系统的剂量率增加,光束延迟略有下降,而光束关闭延迟不受影响。
    结论:验证结果表明,所提出的用于呼吸门控放射治疗的束时间延迟QA方法既可重复又有效,可用于机构进行相应定制。
    OBJECTIVE: To propose a straightforward and time-efficient quality assurance (QA) approach of beam time delay for respiratory-gated radiotherapy and validate the proposed method on typical respiratory gating systems, Catalyst™ and AlignRT™.
    METHODS: The QA apparatus was composed of a motion platform and a Winston-Lutz cube phantom (WL3) embedded with metal balls. The apparatus was first scanned in CT-Sim and two types of QA plans specific for beam on and beam off time delay, respectively, were designed. Static reference images and motion testing images of the WL3 cube were acquired with EPID. By comparing the position differences of the embedded metal balls in the motion and reference images, beam time delays were determined. The proposed approach was validated on three linacs with either Catalyst™ or AlignRT™ respiratory gating systems. To investigate the impact of energy and dose rate on beam time delay, a range of QA plans with Eclipse (V15.7) were devised with varying energy and dose rates.
    RESULTS: For all energies, the beam on time delays in AlignRT™ V6.3.226, AlignRT™ V7.1.1, and Catalyst™ were 92.13 ± $ \\pm $ 5.79 ms, 123.11 ± $ \\pm $ 6.44 ms, and 303.44 ± $ \\pm $ 4.28 ms, respectively. The beam off time delays in AlignRT™ V6.3.226, AlignRT™ V7.1.1, and Catalyst™ were 121.87 ± $ \\pm $ 1.34 ms, 119.33 ± $ \\pm $ 0.75 ms, and 97.69 ± $ \\pm $ 2.02 ms, respectively. Furthermore, the beam on delays decreased slightly as dose rates increased for all gating systems, whereas the beam off delays remained unaffected.
    CONCLUSIONS: The validation results demonstrate the proposed QA approach of beam time delay for respiratory-gated radiotherapy was both reproducible and time-efficient to practice for institutions to customize accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于费用高昂,某些患者的4D-CT数据可能仅包括五个呼吸阶段(0%,20%,40%,60%,和80%)。由于其余五个呼吸阶段缺乏肺部肿瘤信息,因此这种限制可能会影响后续的放射治疗计划(10%,30%,50%,70%,90%)。本研究旨在开发一种插值方法,该方法可以使用可用的5相4D-CT数据自动得出五个省略相的肿瘤边界轮廓。动态模式分解(DMD)方法是一种数据驱动且无模型的技术,可以从高维数据中提取动态信息。它能够仅使用有限数量的时间快照来重建长期动态模式。由呼吸运动引起的可变形肺肿瘤的准周期性运动使其适合于使用DMD的治疗。直接应用DMD办法剖析肿瘤的呼吸运动是不实际的,因为肿瘤是三维的,跨越多个CT切片。预测肺部肿瘤的呼吸运动,开发了一种称为均匀角间隔(UAI)采样的方法来生成相等长度的快照向量,适用于DMD分析。通过将UAI-DMD方法应用于10例肺癌患者的4D-CT数据,证实了这种方法的有效性。结果表明,UAI-DMD方法有效地逼近了肺癌的可变形边界表面和非线性运动轨迹。估计的肿瘤质心在手动描绘的质心的2mm内,与传统的BSpline插值方法相比,误差范围更小,其边缘为3毫米。该方法有可能扩展到基于10期4D-CT数据的动态特征重建肺肿瘤的20期呼吸运动,从而能够更准确地估计计划目标体积(PTV)。
    Due to the high expenses involved, 4D-CT data for certain patients may only include five respiratory phases (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%). This limitation can affect the subsequent planning of radiotherapy due to the absence of lung tumor information for the remaining five respiratory phases (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%). This study aims to develop an interpolation method that can automatically derive tumor boundary contours for the five omitted phases using the available 5-phase 4D-CT data. The dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) method is a data-driven and model-free technique that can extract dynamic information from high-dimensional data. It enables the reconstruction of long-term dynamic patterns using only a limited number of time snapshots. The quasi-periodic motion of a deformable lung tumor caused by respiratory motion makes it suitable for treatment using DMD. The direct application of the DMD method to analyze the respiratory motion of the tumor is impractical because the tumor is three-dimensional and spans multiple CT slices. To predict the respiratory movement of lung tumors, a method called uniform angular interval (UAI) sampling was developed to generate snapshot vectors of equal length, which are suitable for DMD analysis. The effectiveness of this approach was confirmed by applying the UAI-DMD method to the 4D-CT data of ten patients with lung cancer. The results indicate that the UAI-DMD method effectively approximates the lung tumor\'s deformable boundary surface and nonlinear motion trajectories. The estimated tumor centroid is within 2 mm of the manually delineated centroid, a smaller margin of error compared to the traditional BSpline interpolation method, which has a margin of 3 mm. This methodology has the potential to be extended to reconstruct the 20-phase respiratory movement of a lung tumor based on dynamic features from 10-phase 4D-CT data, thereby enabling more accurate estimation of the planned target volume (PTV).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在呼吸困难的患者中,可以使用自由呼吸(FB)呼吸触发(RT)bSSFP电影技术。然而,与屏气(BH)bSSFP电影采集相比,该技术可能具有较差的图像质量和更长的扫描时间.这项研究检查了视听呼吸指导(BG)系统对RTbSSFP电影图像质量的影响,扫描时间,和心室测量。
    方法:本研究评估了一种BG系统,该系统在图像采集过程中使用呼吸波纹管的输入向患者提供有关吸气和呼气定时的视听指示和反馈,以引导他们朝着具有延长呼气末的规律呼吸模式。在这项针对接受临床心脏磁共振检查的患者的单中心前瞻性研究中,在每位患者中使用3种技术获取bSSFP电影图像的心室短轴堆叠:1)FB和RT(FBRT),2)BG系统和RT(BGRT),3)BH。比较了3次采集的图像质量度量(心内膜边缘定义,运动伪影,和血液-心肌造影)在李克特量表上评分,扫描时间,和心室容积和质量。
    结果:32名患者(19名女性;中位年龄21岁,IQR18-32)完成了研究方案。对于扫描时间,BGRT比FBRT快(163svs.345s,p<0.001)。心内膜边缘定义,运动伪影,BGRT和血液-心肌造影均优于FBRT(p<0.001)。左心室(LV)收缩末期容积(ESV)较小(3%,p=0.02)和左心室射血分数(EF)更大(0.5%,p=0.003)用BGRT比用FBRT。左室舒张末期容积(EDV)无显著差异,低压质量,右心室(RV)EDV,RVESV,和RVEF。与BH相比,BGRT的扫描时间更短。BH的心内膜边缘定义和血液与心肌对比比BGRT更好。与BH相比,LVEDV,LVESV,RVEDV,对于BGRT,RVESV略小(所有差异<7%)。
    结论:在RTbSSFP电影采集中添加BG系统缩短了扫描时间并提高了图像质量。在更多样化的人群和其他自由呼吸序列中,需要对这种BG方法进行进一步的探索。
    BACKGROUND: In patients who have difficulty holding their breath, a free breathing (FB) respiratory-triggered (RT) bSSFP cine technique may be used. However, this technique may have inferior image quality and a longer scan time than breath-hold (BH) bSSFP cine acquisitions. This study examined the effect of an audiovisual breathing guidance (BG) system on RT bSSFP cine image quality, scan time, and ventricular measurements.
    METHODS: This study evaluated a BG system that provides audiovisual instructions and feedback on the timing of inspiration and expiration to the patient during image acquisition using input from the respiratory bellows to guide them toward a regular breathing pattern with extended end-expiration. In this single-center prospective study in patients undergoing a clinical cardiac magnetic resonance examination, a ventricular short-axis stack of bSSFP cine images was acquired using 3 techniques in each patient: 1) FB and RT (FBRT), 2) BG system and RT (BGRT), and 3) BH. The 3 acquisitions were compared for image quality metrics (endocardial edge definition, motion artifact, and blood-to-myocardial contrast) scored on a Likert scale, scan time, and ventricular volumes and mass.
    RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (19 females; median age 21 years, IQR 18-32) completed the study protocol. For scan time, BGRT was faster than FBRT (163 s vs. 345 s, p < 0.001). Endocardial edge definition, motion artifact, and blood-to-myocardial contrast were all better for BGRT than FBRT (p < 0.001). Left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume (ESV) was smaller (3%, p = 0.02) and LV ejection fraction (EF) was larger (0.5%, p = 0.003) with BGRT than with FBRT. There was no significant difference in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), LV mass, right ventricular (RV) EDV, RV ESV, and RV EF. Scan times were shorter for BGRT compared to BH. Endocardial edge definition and blood-to-myocardial contrast were better for BH than BGRT. Compared to BH, the LV EDV, LV ESV, RV EDV, and RV ESV were mildly smaller (all differences <7%) for BGRT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a BG system to RT bSSFP cine acquisitions decreased the scan time and improved image quality. Further exploration of this BG approach is warranted in more diverse populations and with other free breathing sequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:呼吸门控粒子治疗系统中的射束递送潜伏期是剂量递送准确性的关键问题。本研究的目的是开发一种多通道信号采集平台,用于研究RPM呼吸门控系统中发生的门控延迟(Varian,美国)和ProBeam质子治疗系统(瓦里安,美国)单独。
    方法:多通道信号采集平台由几个电子元件组成,包括一个用于目标运动检测的字符串位置传感器,用于质子束传感的光电二极管,接口板,用于访问呼吸门测系统和质子治疗系统之间的触发信号,信号采集装置,用于对来自上述组件的信号进行采样和同步,以及用于控制信号采集装置和数据存储的笔记本电脑。通过比较从运动信号中提取的预期门控相位与触发信号的状态转折点来确定RPM系统延迟。通过比较触发信号与波束信号的状态转折点来评估ProBeam系统延迟。总的射束递送延迟被计算为呼吸门控系统和回旋加速器质子治疗系统中的延迟的总和。在延迟测量期间,在不同的振幅和周期下应用模拟的正弦运动,以评估不同呼吸模式下的完整波束传递延迟。每种呼吸模式重复30次用于统计分析。
    结果:发现RPM系统中测得的门控ON/OFF延迟为104.20±13.64ms和113.60±14.98ms,分别。在ProBeam系统中测量的门控ON/OFF延迟为108.29±0.85ms和1.20±0.04ms,分别。总的波束开/关延迟被确定为212.50±13.64ms和114.80±14.98ms。
    结论:借助开发的多通道信号采集平台,它能够研究呼吸门控系统和质子治疗系统中发生的门控滞后。平台的分辨率足以区分毫秒时间级别的延迟。呼吸门控系统和质子治疗系统都对门控延迟做出了贡献。两种系统对总波束开启延迟的贡献几乎相等,大约100毫秒。相比之下,呼吸门控系统是总波束关闭延迟的主要贡献者。
    OBJECTIVE: Beam delivery latency in respiratory-gated particle therapy systems is a crucial issue to dose delivery accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop a multi-channel signal acquisition platform for investigating gating latencies occurring within RPM respiratory gating system (Varian, USA) and ProBeam proton treatment system (Varian, USA) individually.
    METHODS: The multi-channel signal acquisition platform consisted of several electronic components, including a string position sensor for target motion detection, a photodiode for proton beam sensing, an interfacing board for accessing the trigger signal between the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system, a signal acquisition device for sampling and synchronizing signals from the aforementioned components, and a laptop for controlling the signal acquisition device and data storage. RPM system latencies were determined by comparing the expected gating phases extracted from the motion signal with the trigger signal\'s state turning points. ProBeam system latencies were assessed by comparing the state turning points of the trigger signal with the beam signal. The total beam delivery latencies were calculated as the sum of delays in the respiratory gating system and the cyclotron proton treatment system. During latency measurements, simulated sinusoidal motion were applied at different amplitudes and periods for complete beam delivery latency evaluation under different breathing patterns. Each breathing pattern was repeated 30 times for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: The measured gating ON/OFF latencies in the RPM system were found to be 104.20 ± 13.64 ms and 113.60 ± 14.98 ms, respectively. The measured gating ON/OFF delays in the ProBeam system were 108.29 ± 0.85 ms and 1.20 ± 0.04 ms, respectively. The total beam ON/OFF latencies were determined to be 212.50 ± 13.64 ms and 114.80 ± 14.98 ms.
    CONCLUSIONS: With the developed multi-channel signal acquisition platform, it was able to investigate the gating lags happened in both the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system. The resolution of the platform is enough to distinguish the delays at the millisecond time level. Both the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system made contributions to gating latency. Both systems contributed nearly equally to the total beam ON latency, with approximately 100 ms. In contrast, the respiratory gating system was the dominant contributor to the total beam OFF latency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自由运行的心脏和呼吸运动分辨的全心5DMRI可以减少扫描计划,并提供一种评估呼吸驱动的感兴趣的临床参数变化的手段。然而,呼吸分辨成像可能受到用户定义的参数的限制,这些参数在残余伪影和运动模糊之间进行权衡。在这项工作中,我们开发并验证了纠正箱内呼吸运动和补偿箱间呼吸运动的策略,以提高5DMRI的质量。
    方法:使用模拟自由运行数据(N=50)和32例先天性心脏病患者的队列,对重建框架的每个组成部分进行了系统验证,并与先前建立的5D方法进行了比较。在图像清晰度方面评估箱内呼吸运动校正的影响,而在重建误差方面评估箱间呼吸运动补偿,压缩呼吸运动,和图像清晰度。专家评审人员在图像清晰度和图像质量评分方面评估了完整的重建框架(IIMC5D)。
    结果:箱内运动校正为模拟数据和患者数据提供了明显(p<10-3)更清晰的图像。箱间运动补偿导致显著(p<10-3)较低的重建误差,较低的运动压缩,和更高的清晰度在模拟(10/11)和患者(9/11)的数据。相对于先前建立的5D实现(End-Exp:0.43±0.08,End-Ins:0.39±0.09),组合框架导致显著(p<10-3)更清晰的IIMC5D重建(End-Exp:0.45±0.09,End-Ins:0.46±0.10)。同样,使用IIMC5D(End-Exp:3.39±0.44,End-Ins:3.32±0.45),相对于5D图像(End-Exp:3.02±0.54,End-Ins:2.45±0.52),三位专家评审的图像评分显著(p<10-3)更高。
    结论:提出的IIMC重建显著提高了5D全心MRI的质量。这可以用于更高分辨率或缩写扫描。需要进一步研究该框架的诊断影响并与黄金标准进行比较,以了解其完整的临床实用性,包括探索呼吸驱动的生理测量变化。
    BACKGROUND: Free-running cardiac and respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart five-dimensional (5D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can reduce scan planning and provide a means of evaluating respiratory-driven changes in clinical parameters of interest. However, respiratory-resolved imaging can be limited by user-defined parameters which create trade-offs between residual artifact and motion blur. In this work, we develop and validate strategies for both correction of intra-bin and compensation of inter-bin respiratory motion to improve the quality of 5D CMR.
    METHODS: Each component of the reconstruction framework was systematically validated and compared to the previously established 5D approach using simulated free-running data (N = 50) and a cohort of 32 patients with congenital heart disease. The impact of intra-bin respiratory motion correction was evaluated in terms of image sharpness while inter-bin respiratory motion compensation was evaluated in terms of reconstruction error, compression of respiratory motion, and image sharpness. The full reconstruction framework (intra-acquisition correction and inter-acquisition compensation of respiratory motion [IIMC] 5D) was evaluated in terms of image sharpness and scoring of image quality by expert reviewers.
    RESULTS: Intra-bin motion correction provides significantly (p < 0.001) sharper images for both simulated and patient data. Inter-bin motion compensation results in significant (p < 0.001) lower reconstruction error, lower motion compression, and higher sharpness in both simulated (10/11) and patient (9/11) data. The combined framework resulted in significantly (p < 0.001) sharper IIMC 5D reconstructions (End-expiration (End-Exp): 0.45 ± 0.09, End-inspiration (End-Ins): 0.46 ± 0.10) relative to the previously established 5D implementation (End-Exp: 0.43 ± 0.08, End-Ins: 0.39 ± 0.09). Similarly, image scoring by three expert reviewers was significantly (p < 0.001) higher using IIMC 5D (End-Exp: 3.39 ± 0.44, End-Ins: 3.32 ± 0.45) relative to 5D images (End-Exp: 3.02 ± 0.54, End-Ins: 2.45 ± 0.52).
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed IIMC reconstruction significantly improves the quality of 5D whole-heart MRI. This may be exploited for higher resolution or abbreviated scanning. Further investigation of the diagnostic impact of this framework and comparison to gold standards is needed to understand its full clinical utility, including exploration of respiratory-driven changes in physiological measurements of interest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自由呼吸腹部化学交换饱和转移(CEST)具有巨大的临床应用潜力,但其技术实施仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在提出和评估自由呼吸腹部CEST序列。所提出的序列采用呼吸门控(ResGat)来使数据采集与呼吸运动同步,并在CEST饱和之前执行水预饱和模块,以消除呼吸引起的重复时间变化的影响。进行了体内实验,以比较不同的呼吸运动控制策略和B0偏移校正方法,并评估准稳态(QUASS)方法校正水预饱和模块对CEST信号影响的有效性和必要性。与屏气(BH)和呼吸触发相比,在连续采集的CESTS0图像上,目标呼气相位为0.5的ResGat导致更高的结构相似性指数和更低的变异系数(所有p<0.05)。从腹部CEST数据集本身得出的B0图对于B0校正更稳定,与通过双回波时间扫描分别获取的B0图和从水饱和度偏移参考方法得出的B0图进行比较。与BH相比,ResGat在3.5ppm时产生了更均匀的磁化转移比不对称图(标准偏差:3.96%与3.19%,p=0.036),扫描和重新扫描之间的均方差较低(27.52/vs.16.82,p=0.004)。QUASS方法可以校正水的预饱和引起的CEST信号变化,但其在体内扫描的必要性需要进一步验证。使用ResGat提出的自由呼吸腹部CEST序列的采集效率约为使用BH的四倍。总之,与使用BH的腹部CEST相比,所提出的使用ResGat和水的预饱和的自由呼吸腹部CEST序列具有更高的采集效率和图像质量。
    Free-breathing abdominal chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) has great potential for clinical application, but its technical implementation remains challenging. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a free-breathing abdominal CEST sequence. The proposed sequence employed respiratory gating (ResGat) to synchronize the data acquisition with respiratory motion and performed a water presaturation module before the CEST saturation to abolish the influence of respiration-induced repetition time variation. In vivo experiments were performed to compare different respiratory motion-control strategies and B0 offset correction methods, and to evaluate the effectiveness and necessity of the quasi-steady-state (QUASS) approach for correcting the influence of the water presaturation module on CEST signal. ResGat with a target expiratory phase of 0.5 resulted in a higher structural similarity index and a lower coefficient of variation on consecutively acquired CEST S0 images than breath-holding (BH) and respiratory triggering (all p < 0.05). B0 maps derived from the abdominal CEST dataset itself were more stable for B0 correction, compared with the separately acquired B0 maps by a dual-echo time scan and B0 maps derived from the water saturation shift referencing approach. Compared with BH, ResGat yielded more homogeneous magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry maps at 3.5 ppm (standard deviation: 3.96% vs. 3.19%, p = 0.036) and a lower mean squared difference between scan and rescan (27.52‱ vs. 16.82‱, p = 0.004). The QUASS approach could correct the water presaturation-induced CEST signal change, but its necessity for in vivo scanning needs further verification. The proposed free-breathing abdominal CEST sequence using ResGat had an acquisition efficiency of approximately four times that using BH. In conclusion, the proposed free-breathing abdominal CEST sequence using ResGat and water presaturation has a higher acquisition efficiency and image quality than abdominal CEST using BH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号