Purpose: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of topical application of a neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist in a rabbit model of nonallergic ocular redness. Methods: Nonallergic ocular redness was induced in rabbits by a single, topical application of dapiparzole hydrochloride eye drops (0.5%, 1%, 2%, or 5%). The NK1R antagonist L-703,606 was topically applied to the eye at the same time of induction or 20 min after induction, and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) treatment served as the control. Superior bulbar conjunctival images were taken every 30 s for the first 2 min, followed by every 4 min for 8 min, and then every 10 min until 1 h. The severity of ocular redness was evaluated on the images using ImageJ-based ocular redness index (ORI) calculations. Results: The ORI scores were significantly increased after the application of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, or 5% dapiparzole at each time point evaluated, with the most severe redness induced by the 5% dapiprazole that led to a maximal mean increase in ORI score of 14 at 20 min post-induction and thus used for subsequent evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of NK1R antagonism. Topical L-703,606, when applied at the same time as dapiprazole induction, significantly suppressed the increase of ORI scores at all time points (∼40% decrease). Furthermore, when applied at 20 min after dapiprazole induction, L-703,606 rapidly and effectively suppressed the increase of ORI scores at 30, 40, 50, and 60 min (∼30% decrease). Conclusions: Topical blockade of NK1R effectively prevents and alleviates nonallergic ocular redness in a novel animal model.

BACKGROUND: Red eye is a common symptom in patients visiting the ophthalmology outpatient department (OPD). However, not all with red eye are due to infection and some can be threatening to visual loss. This study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) among the general public regarding red eye attending a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted after approval by the institutional ethics review board among 500 patients >18 years attending general OPD excluding ophthalmology in tertiary hospital and research institute, Tamil Nadu, from January 2022 to April 2022. After informed consent, a semi-structured questionnaire with details of KAP on red eye was used and analyzed with descriptive statistics and Chi-square test using SPSS version 16.
RESULTS: Among the 500 participants, one-third were >60 years, 58%-females. Only 15.6% had awareness on red eye, 12.6% were aware of serious side effects while <10% knew the complication of red eye such as visual loss can follow if left untreated. Among those aware, 63% reported infection as the most common cause, followed by injury and allergy. Source of awareness was from past experience in the majority of the patients, followed by mass media and doctors. Only 12.4% had a positive attitude while 14.2% had good practice of seeking medical attention. Harmful practices such as instilling breast milk and instilling over-counter drops were highly prevalent. The major determinants of awareness were younger age, literacy, and health education given by health personnel (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Awareness about red eye, attitude, and practice among the general population in rural settings in Tamil Nadu are still poor. The need of the hour is for health education on red eye and management to prevent morbidity and loss of vision in the community at all levels of health care.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to describe and compare the risk factors, clinical course, diagnosis, and parasitologic features of external ophthalmomyiasis. We also discuss the different preventive measures and the effect of global warming in a large case series reported from January 2000 to December 2022.
METHODS: We perform a literature review of reported cases of external ophthalmomyiasis to determine the clinical characteristics, therapeutic management, and information on the organisms that most commonly cause external ophthalmomyiasis.
RESULTS: A total of 312 cases of external ophthalmomyiasis were recorded. The most common causative organism was Oestrus ovis (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Oestridae), accounting for 72.1% of cases, followed by Dermatobia hominis (Linnaeus Jr. in Pallas, 1781) (Diptera: Oestridae) at 5.4%, Lucilia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) at 0.96%, and Chrysomyia bezziana (Villeneuve) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) at 0.96%. Before experiencing symptoms, 43.6% of cases reported having direct contact with flies or being hit in the eye, 33% reported no associated risk factors, 9.3% reported living with sheep and goats, and 7.7% reported a history of foreign objects entering the eye. The most common symptoms for those affected by O. ovis were sudden onset, including a foreign body sensation and movement, redness, tearing, itching, swelling, irritation, photophobia, burning, and ocular secretion. In cases caused by D. hominis, symptoms included eyelid edema, pain, redness, itching, movement within the lesion, ocular irritation, and discharge. Regarding occupational or recreational activity, agriculture, and livestock had the highest incidence, followed by trades and technical activities, being a student, and having traveled to an endemic region for work or recreation.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with red eyes may suffer from external ophthalmomyiasis, which requires a thorough examination to diagnose and treat it early. Moreover, as the temperature increases due to climate change, it is essential to consider how this will affect the spread of different pathogens.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) was notified by China on December 31, 2019, of a pneumonia outbreak severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus-19 virus infection in Wuhan. This outbreak was declared by the WHO from the Public Health Emergency of International Concern to formal declaration as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Because the public health measures like lockdown, the eye care delivery system was markedly impacted. The aim of this study was to find out if any pattern change of red eye cases among patients who attended eye accident and emergency (A and E) in a tertiary care hospital during COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to 2019 and 2018.
METHODS: This was a cohort retrospective study which included all patients who presented to eye A and E clinic with red eye from March 1 to July 31 in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Data were analyzed using statistical tools in the SPSS software. Furthermore, the clinical records of 578 inpatients with proven COVID-19 were reviewed for any red eye problem.
RESULTS: Out of 7895 eye patients attended eye A and E clinic during March-July of 2018, 2019, and 2020, 1573 (19.9%) patients had red eye. Males were slightly dominant with 59%, and unilateral cases were the majority among them. The most common causes of red eye in 2018 and 2019 were injury, conjunctivitis, and keratitis; whereas in 2020, a clear dominance of injury and keratitis cases was found. Only 10 (2.03%) patients out of the 493 outpatients with red eye during the 5-month period in 2020 reported a prior contact to a COVID-19 positive case; of whom nine patients had conjunctivitis, and one had a right eye open globe injury. Of the 578 inpatients with proven COVID-19, only 1 (0.17%) patient had red eye with the diagnosis of conjunctivitis.
CONCLUSIONS: There was relatively increased number of adults reporting with red eye in 2020. Eye injuries were the most common among all years, followed by conjunctivitis and keratitis. Ocular problems, however, might be a primary or secondary COVID-19 complaint and seem to be relatively uncommon in COVID-19 individuals.

UNASSIGNED: Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed. In polytraumatized patients, the focus is primarily on treating potentially life-threatening conditions such as increased intracranial pressure and hemorrhages. This case report aims to identify common diagnostic mistakes in rare pathologies.
UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a young female patient who was admitted to the emergency room after a motorbike accident. The patient\'s vital parameters were successfully stabilized, and she spent approximately four weeks in the ICU and neurosurgical ward. The patient exhibited limited communication, ophthalmoplegia, and a swollen, red left eye. After four weeks, the patient\'s parents initiated admission to our department due to the suspicious red swollen eye. Angiography revealed a complete rupture of the internal carotid artery (ICA) into the cavernous sinus, and occlusion of the ICA showed significant improvement in the eye edema and the patient\'s mental state. Two days later, the patient was able to communicate with complex sentences. Three months after the occlusion, the patient showed positive progress, posting dancing videos on TikTok.
UNASSIGNED: A carotid-cavernous fistula presenting with a red swollen eye can be misdiagnosed as retrobulbar hematoma or conjunctivitis. Failure to recognize and treat it promptly can lead to severe morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Vision-related disorders are common in children. Therefore, eye examination and thorough visual assessment by first-contact physicians are crucial in children. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of and attitude toward children\'s eye disorders among pediatricians and family physicians in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Western Region (MNGHA-WR) of Saudi Arabia.
METHODS: In this observational, cross-sectional study, we used a self-administered, web-based questionnaire. The sample size was calculated to be 148 pediatricians and family physicians (of 240 in total) currently working at MNGHA-WR. The first section of the questionnaire dwelled on demographics, while the second section addressed the physician\'s knowledge of and attitude toward commonly encountered ophthalmological pathologies in children. Data collected were entered into Microsoft Excel and then transferred to IBM SPSS version 22 for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 148 responses (92 family physicians and 56 pediatricians) were received. Most of the participants were residents or staff physicians (n = 105, 70.9%). The mean knowledge score of the respondents was 54.67% ± 14.5%. Participants\' knowledge was further subclassified using Bloom\'s original cutoff points into high (n = 4, 2.7%), moderate (n = 53, 35.8%), and low (n = 91, 61.5%) levels of knowledge. Regarding practices, 120 (81%) participants performed ophthalmic examinations; however, only 39 (26.4%) conducted routine examinations as part of every child\'s visit. Fundus examinations were performed by 25 (16.9%) physicians. A significant deficiency in knowledge was noted in those with < 1 year of work experience (P = 0.014). Although statistically not significant (P = 0.052), family physicians possessed better knowledge than pediatricians regarding children\'s eye disorders. On the contrary, more pediatricians performed eye examinations than family physicians (P = 0.015). The male sex was also associated with higher rates of eye examination (P = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: An unsatisfactory level of knowledge of eye disease among participating doctors was reported. The proportion was significantly higher among residents and staff physicians. Therefore, awareness efforts should be incorporated in both family medicine and pediatrics residency programs to limit the number of cases of ocular disorders going undiagnosed in children.

The current diagnostic aids for red eye are static flowcharts that do not provide dynamic, stepwise workups. The diagnostic accuracy of a novel dynamic Bayesian algorithm for red eye was tested. Fifty-seven patients with red eye were evaluated by an emergency medicine physician who completed a questionnaire about symptoms/findings (without requiring extensive slit lamp findings). An ophthalmologist then attributed an independent \"gold-standard diagnosis\". The algorithm used questionnaire data to suggest a differential diagnosis. The referrer\'s diagnostic accuracy was 70.2%, while the algorithm\'s accuracy was 68.4%, increasing to 75.4% with the algorithm\'s top two diagnoses included and 80.7% with the top three included. In urgent cases of red eye (n = 26), the referrer diagnostic accuracy was 76.9%, while the algorithm\'s top diagnosis was 73.1% accurate, increasing to 84.6% (top two included) and 88.5% (top three included). The algorithm\'s sensitivity for urgent cases was 76.9% (95% CI: 56-91%) using its top diagnosis, with a specificity of 93.6% (95% CI: 79-99%). This novel algorithm provides dynamic workups using clinical symptoms, and may be used as an adjunct to clinical judgement for triaging the urgency of ocular causes of red eye.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to find the incidence of ocular manifestations and to investigate the relation of ocular manifestations with the disease severity among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.
METHODS: Our study is a cross-sectional study done between May 15, 2020, and April 15, 2021, at Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India. All COVID-19 patients who got admitted to our center between May 15, 2020, and April 15, 2021, were included in our study. We included 261 patients in our study. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was made by testing the nasal and pharyngeal swabs by (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]). An RT-PCR test positive was the criteria for admission in the COVID ward. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: We included 261 patients in our study. Out of 261 patients, ocular manifestations were found in 43 (16.4%) patients. The patients with ocular manifestations had higher neutrophil counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and D-dimer values (P < 0.001). Patients with ocular manifestations were relatively more symptomatic concerning fever and myalgia.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ocular manifestations in COVID-19 patients was 16.4%. Ocular manifestation was significantly associated with raised neutrophil counts, CRP, ESR, PCT, and D-dimer values. Ocular manifestation was also significantly associated with higher body temperature and higher mean age. The findings of the study are suggestive of more severe disease in patients of COVID-19 with ocular manifestations.

Allergic conjunctivitis is the most common cause leading to ocular redness (OR). Herein, using an animal model of allergic OR, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of topical blockade of substance P (SP) in treating red eye.
Allergic OR was induced in guinea pigs with topical histamine. Ocular SP was blocked using a specific SP receptor (neurokinin-1 receptor, NK1R) antagonist, L-703,606, via topical application 10 min before or 10 min after histamine instillation. Animal eyes were examined and a series of images were taken for up to 60 min post-OR induction. The severity of redness was analyzed using the quantitative ocular redness index (ORI). At the end of clinical examination, conjunctival tissues were collected for histological examination of conjunctival blood vessels and infiltrating eosinophils and neutrophils. In addition, SP concentration was quantified in the tear fluid and expression levels of inflammatory cytokines were assessed in the conjunctival tissues.
Topical histamine application successfully induced red eye, evidenced by the significantly increased ORI during the observation period, with peak values at 10 min, along with significantly increased levels of SP in the tears. Topical treatment with L-703,606, either before histamine application or at the time of peak ORI, effectively reduced ORI and suppressed conjunctival blood vessel dilation, along with decreased eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration, and inflammatory cytokine expression in the conjunctiva, as well as reduced SP levels in the tears.
Topical blockade of SP effectively prevents and treats allergy-related ocular redness by suppressing blood vessel dilation and allergic inflammation.