UNASSIGNED: Part of the current stereotactic arrythmia radioablation (STAR) workflow is transfer of findings from the electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to computed tomography (CT). Here, we analyzed inter- and intraobserver variation in a modified EAM-CT registration using automatic registration algorithms designed to yield higher robustness.
UNASSIGNED: This work is based on data of 10 patients who had previously undergone STAR. Two observers participated in this study: (1) an electrophysiologist technician (cardiology) with substatial experience in EAM-CT merge, and (2) a clinical engineer (radiotherapy) with minimum experience with EAM-CT merge. EAM-CT merge consists of 3 main steps: segmentation of left ventricle from CT (CT LV), registration of the CT LV and EAM, clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from EAM specific points. Mean Hausdorff distance (MHD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and absolute difference in Center of Gravity (CoG) were used to assess intra/interobserver variability.
UNASSIGNED: Intraobserver variability: The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CT LVs altogether was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 1.49 ± 0.23 mm. The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CTVs altogether was 0,82 ± 0,06 and 0,71 ± 0,22 mm. Interobserver variability: Segmented CT LVs showed great similarity (mean DSC of 0,91 ± 0,01, MHD of 1,86 ± 0,47 mm). The mean DSC comparing CTVs from both observers was 0,81 ± 0,11 and MHD was 0,87 ± 0,45 mm.
UNASSIGNED: The high interobserver similarity of segmented LVs and delineated CTVs confirmed the robustness of the proposed method. Even an inexperienced user can perform a precise EAM-CT merge following workflow instructions.

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical data demonstrated that the use of proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces the risk of toxicity in healthy tissue. Ventricular tachycardia radioablation is an area under clinical investigation in proton beam therapy. We sought to simulate a ventricular tachycardia radioablation with proton minibeams and to demonstrate that it was possible to obtain a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone with this technique.
METHODS: An arrhythmogenic target volume was defined on the simulation CT scan of a patient, localized in the lateral wall of the left ventricle. A dose of 25Gy was planned to be delivered by proton minibeam radiotherapy, simulated using a Monte Carlo code (TOPAS v.3.7) with a collimator of 19 0.4 mm-wide slits spaced 3mm apart. The main objective of the study was to obtain a plan ensuring at least 93% of the prescription dose in 93% of the planning target volume without exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume.
RESULTS: The average dose in the planning treatment volume in proton minibeam radiotherapy was 25.12Gy. The percentage of the planning target volume receiving 93% (V93%), 110% (V110%), and 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 94.25%, 0%, and 92.6% respectively. The lateral penumbra was 6.6mm. The mean value of the peak-to-valley-dose ratio in the planning target volume was 1.06. The mean heart dose was 2.54Gy versus 5.95Gy with stereotactic photon beam irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study shows that proton minibeam radiotherapy can achieve a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone, reducing the dose at the normal tissues. This technique, ensuring could theoretically reduce the risk of late pulmonary and breast fibrosis, as well as cardiac toxicity as seen in previous biological studies in proton minibeam radiotherapy.

Varicose veins are a common vascular condition known for causing discomfort and cosmetic concerns. This comprehensive narrative review delves into their anatomy, pathophysiology, and modern treatment options, with a focus on endovenous techniques and sclerotherapy. The review starts by emphasizing the intricate anatomy of lower extremity venous circulation, underlining the significance of both superficial and deep venous networks in venous return. It also addresses how changes in the venous wall, including valvular insufficiency, contribute to the development of varicose veins. Endovenous techniques like endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) are explored in detail. These minimally invasive procedures have revolutionized varicose vein treatment, offering high success rates and quicker recovery compared to traditional surgery. The review also highlights their efficacy and safety profiles, aiding clinicians in informed decision-making. Sclerotherapy, a vital modality for varicose veins, is thoroughly examined, covering both liquid and foam sclerotherapy. Foam sclerotherapy, in particular, is recognized for its improved outcomes. The review provides a comprehensive comparison of these treatment modalities, highlighting differences in technical success, recurrence rates, and cost-effectiveness. Patient preferences and satisfaction play a significant role in choosing the right treatment. Safety and potential complications associated with these treatments are explored, with a focus on minor issues and rare adverse events. This review also emphasizes the positive impact of varicose vein interventions on patients\' quality of life.

Currently, the standard curative treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, when the VT circuit is deep in the myocardium, the catheter may not be delivered, and a new, minimally invasive treatment using different energies is desired.
This is a protocol paper for a feasibility study designed to provide stereotactic radiotherapy for refractory VT not cured by catheter ablation after at least one catheter ablation. The primary end point is to evaluate the short-term safety of this treatment and the secondary endpoint is to evaluate its efficacy as assessed by the reduction in VT episode. Cyberknife M6 radiosurgery system will be used for treatment, and the prescribed dose to the target will be 25Gy in one fraction. The study will be conducted on three patients.
Since catheter ablation is the only treatment option for VT that is covered by insurance in Japan, there is currently no other treatment for VT/VF that cannot be cured by catheter ablation. We hope that this feasibility study will provide hope for patients who are currently under the stress of ICD activation.
The study has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs042230030).

Patients treated with cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (radioablation) for refractory ventricular arrhythmias are patients with advanced structural heart disease and significant comorbidities. However, data regarding 1-year mortality after the procedure are scarce. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed at determining 1-year mortality after cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias and investigating leading causes of death in this population. MEDLINE/EMBASE databases were searched up to January 2023 for studies including patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Quality of included trials was assessed using the NIH Tool for Case Series Studies (PROSPERO CRD42022379713). A total of 1,151 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. Data were extracted from 16 studies, with a total of 157 patients undergoing cardiac radioablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. Pooled 1-year mortality was 32 % (95 %CI: 23-41), with almost half of the deaths occurring within three months after treatment. Among the 157 patients, 46 died within the year following cardiac radioablation. Worsening heart failure appeared to be the leading cause of death (52 %), although non-cardiac mortality remained substantial (41 %) in this population. Age≥70yo was associated with a significantly higher 12-month all-cause mortality (p<0.022). Neither target volume size nor radiotherapy device appeared to be associated with 1-year mortality (p = 0.465 and p = 0.199, respectively). About one-third of patients undergoing cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias die within the first year after the procedure. Worsening heart failure appears to be the leading cause of death in this population.

UNASSIGNED: Cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia (VT), stand as a significant threat to health, often leading to mortality and sudden cardiac death. While conventional treatments for VT exhibit efficacy, cases of refractory VT pose challenges. Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) offers a novel approach, delivering precise high-dose radiation to well-defined targets with minimal collateral damage. This study explores the potential of STAR as an alternative therapy, especially for high-risk patients or those with refractory VT.
UNASSIGNED: This research reviews ongoing studies and preliminary investigations into the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of STAR. The method involves targeted radiation delivery, assessing reductions in VT recurrence and the early safety profile in refractory VT patients. However, given STAR\'s early stage and limited clinical evidence, cautious interpretation is advised.
UNASSIGNED: Preliminary findings indicate a reduction in VT recurrence with STAR, suggesting promise as a therapeutic option. Early safety profiles are encouraging, but definitive statements on efficacy and safety require further investigation. Positive initial outcomes underscore the need for additional data and long-term studies.
UNASSIGNED: Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation is recently emerging as a promising treatment for refractory VT. While early results are encouraging, careful interpretation is needed, due to STAR\'s early stages. Ongoing investigations are critical for a comprehensive understanding of its long-term efficacy and tolerability. This review provides fundamental insights into STAR\'s background, principles, pre-treatment procedures, clinical implications, and toxicity, setting the stage for future research in this evolving therapeutic field.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important type of arrhythmia with a risk of sudden death. Although implanted cardiac defibrillation and radiofrequency ablation are used together with medical treatments for VT, the treatment options are limited in cases that do not respond to them. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) applied to VT substrates in resistant cases is an emerging treatment with positive results. Such clinical results have increased the interest in this subject. However, the ideal treatment device and method have not yet been described for this therapy, which is generally applied at a single fraction using various devices and methods. Herein, treatment planning was conducted for a total of 8 patients (11 VT substrates) using the Varian TrueBeam EDGE and TomoTherapy Radixact devices at a single center, and the results were compared dosimetrically. The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used for the statistical analysis, and mean values were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). In the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, the plan coverages and conformity indexes were similar; meanwhile, the homogeneity indexes were 0.10 (IQR = 0.05) and 0.07 (IQR = 0.05), respectively, and were significantly better in the HT plan (p = 0.02). The gradient indexes were 3.18 (IQR = 0.8) and 5.33 (IQR = 3.68) in the VMAT and HT plans, respectively, and were significantly better in the VMAT plan. For the organs at risk, similar doses were observed. The maximum doses for the stomach and esophagus and the mean doses for the left lung and both lungs were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. Similarly, the maximum and mean doses for the cardiac substructures and great vessels were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. More homogeneous plans were obtained in HT, while a faster dose reduction and lower critical organ dose were observed in VMAT. Reasonable myocardial SABR plans could be obtained with both techniques. The effects of the dosimetric differences on the clinical outcomes should be evaluated in prospective clinical studies.

The aim of this narrative review of the literature was to collect and analyze the results of the published preclinical studies on stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrhythmias. A literature search was conducted on PubMed using the following terms: (\"stereotactic\" OR \"SBRT\" OR \"SABR\" OR \"radioablation\" OR \"radiosurgery\") AND (\"arrhythmia\" OR \"tachycardia\"). Preclinical and pathological reports published in English without time limit, comprising studies of STAR in animal models and histological analyzes of explanted animal and human hearts were included. The analyzed studies confirm that doses lower than 25 Gy seem to produce sub-optimal therapeutic results whereas doses >35 Gy are less safe in terms of radiation-induced toxicity. However, long-term results (>1 year) are still missing and reporting outcomes based on low dose irradiation (≤15 Gy). Finally, STAR proved to be an effective therapy in the analyzed studies despite the irradiation of rather different cardiac targets. Therefore, additional studies are needed to: 1) compare the outcomes of STAR at doses of 25 Gy versus 30 Gy; 2) evaluate the long-term results (>1 year) in animal models irradiated at doses similar to those used in the clinic; 3) define the optimal target.

UNASSIGNED: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening condition often observed in patients with structural heart disease. Ventricular tachycardia ablation through radiation therapy (VT-ART) for sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia seems promising, effective, and safe. VT-ART delivers focused, high-dose radiation, usually in a single fraction of 25 Gy, allowing ablation of VT by inducing myocardial scars. The procedure is fully non-invasive; therefore, it can be easily performed in patients with contraindications to invasive ablation procedures. Definitive data are lacking, and no direct comparison with standard procedures is available.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this multicenter observational study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VT-ART, comparing the clinical outcome of patients undergone to VT-ART to patients not having received such a procedure. The two groups will not be collected by direct, prospective accrual to avoid randomization among the innovative and traditional arm: A retrospective selection through matched pair analysis will collect patients presenting features similar to the ones undergone VT-ART within the consortium (in each center independently). Our trial will enroll patients with optimized medical therapy in whom endocardial and/or epicardial radiofrequency ablation (RFA), the gold standard for VT ablation, is either unfeasible or fails to control VT recurrence. Our primary outcome is investigating the difference in overall cardiovascular survival among the group undergoing VT-ART and the one not exposed to the innovative procedure. The secondary outcome is evaluating the difference in ventricular event-free survival after the last procedure (i.e., last RFA vs. VT-ART) between the two groups. An additional secondary aim is to evaluate the reduction in the number of VT episodes comparing the 3 months before the procedure to the ones recorded at 6 months (from the 4th to 6th month) following VT-ART and RFA, respectively. Other secondary objectives include identifying the benefits of VT-ART on cardiac function, as evaluated through an electrocardiogram, echocardiographic, biochemical variables, and on patient quality of life. We calculated the sample size (in a 2:1 ratio) upon enrolling 149 patients: 100 in the non-exposed control group and 49 in the VT-ART group. Progressively, on a multicentric basis supervised by the promoting center in the VT-ART consortium, for each VT-ART patient enrollment, a matched pair patient profile according to the predefined features will be shared with the consortium to enroll a patient that has not undergone VT-ART.
UNASSIGNED: Our trial will provide insight into the efficacy and safety of VT-ART through a matched pair analysis, via an observational, multicentric study of two groups of patients with or without VT-ART in the multicentric consortium (with subgroup stratification into dynamic cohorts).

暂无摘要。