Interactomics is bringing a deluge of data regarding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) which are involved in various molecular processes in all types of cells. However, this information does not easily translate into direct and precise molecular interfaces. This limits our understanding of each interaction network and prevents their efficient modulation. A lot of the detected interactions involve recognition of short linear motifs (SLiMs) by a folded domain while others rely on domain-domain interactions. Functional SLiMs hide among a lot of spurious ones, making deeper analysis of interactomes tedious. Hence, actual contacts and direct interactions are difficult to identify.Consequently, there is a need for user-friendly bioinformatic tools, enabling rapid molecular and structural analysis of SLiM-based PPIs in a protein network. In this chapter, we describe the use of the new webserver SLiMAn to help digging into SLiM-based PPIs in an interactive fashion.

Virus receptors determine the tissue tropism of viruses and have a certain relationship with the clinical outcomes caused by viral infection, which is of great importance for the identification of virus receptors to understand the infection mechanism of viruses and to develop entry inhibitor. Proximity labeling (PL) is a new technique for studying protein-protein interactions, but it has not yet been applied to the identification of virus receptors or co-receptors. Here, we attempt to identify co-receptor of SARS-CoV-2 by employing TurboID-catalyzed PL. The membrane protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was employed as a bait and conjugated to TurboID, and a A549 cell line with stable expression of ACE2-TurboID was constructed. SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus were incubated with ACE2-TurboID stably expressed cell lines in the presence of biotin and ATP, which could initiate the catalytic activity of TurboID and tag adjacent endogenous proteins with biotin. Subsequently, the biotinylated proteins were harvested and identified by mass spectrometry. We identified a membrane protein, AXL, that has been functionally shown to mediate SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells. Our data suggest that PL could be used to identify co-receptors for virus entry.

The chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding protein-protein interactions in cellular mechanisms and highlights the role of computational modeling in predicting these interactions. It discusses sequence-based approaches such as evolutionary trace (ET), correlated mutation analysis (CMA), and subtractive correlated mutation (SCM) for identifying crucial amino acid residues, considering interface conservation or evolutionary changes. The chapter also explores methods like differential ET, hidden-site class model, and spatial cluster detection (SCD) for interface specificity and spatial clustering. Furthermore, it examines approaches combining structural and sequential methodologies and evaluates modeled predictions through initiatives like critical assessment of prediction of interactions (CAPRI). Additionally, the chapter provides an overview of various software programs used for molecular docking, detailing their search, sampling, refinement and scoring stages, along with innovative techniques and tools like normal mode analysis (NMA) and adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS) for electrostatic calculations. These computational and experimental approaches are crucial for unraveling protein-protein interactions and aid in developing potential therapeutics for various diseases.

Protein-protein interactions are involved in almost all processes in a living cell and determine the biological functions of proteins. To obtain mechanistic understandings of protein-protein interactions, the tertiary structures of protein complexes have been determined by biophysical experimental methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy. However, as experimental methods are costly in resources, many computational methods have been developed that model protein complex structures. One of the difficulties in computational protein complex modeling (protein docking) is to select the most accurate models among many models that are usually generated by a docking method. This article reviews advances in protein docking model assessment methods, focusing on recent developments that apply deep learning to several network architectures.

Protein-protein binding affinity prediction is important for understanding complex biochemical pathways and to uncover protein interaction networks. Quantitative estimation of the binding affinity changes caused by mutations can provide critical information for protein function annotation and genetic disease diagnoses. The binding free energies of protein-protein complexes can be predicted using several computational tools. This chapter is a summary of software developed for the prediction of binding free energies for protein-protein complexes and their mutants.

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) provide valuable insights for understanding the principles of biological systems and for elucidating causes of incurable diseases. One of the techniques used for computational prediction of PPIs is protein-protein docking calculations, and a variety of software has been developed. This chapter is a summary of software and databases used for protein-protein docking.

An exponential increase in the number of publications that address artificial intelligence (AI) usage in life sciences has been noticed in recent years, while new modeling techniques are constantly being reported. The potential of these methods is vast-from understanding fundamental cellular processes to discovering new drugs and breakthrough therapies. Computational studies of protein-protein interactions, crucial for understanding the operation of biological systems, are no exception in this field. However, despite the rapid development of technology and the progress in developing new approaches, many aspects remain challenging to solve, such as predicting conformational changes in proteins, or more \"trivial\" issues as high-quality data in huge quantities.Therefore, this chapter focuses on a short introduction to various AI approaches to study protein-protein interactions, followed by a description of the most up-to-date algorithms and programs used for this purpose. Yet, given the considerable pace of development in this hot area of computational science, at the time you read this chapter, the development of the algorithms described, or the emergence of new (and better) ones should come as no surprise.

Concerted interactions between all the cell components form the basis of biological processes. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) constitute a tremendous part of this interaction network. Deeper insight into PPIs can help us better understand numerous diseases and lead to the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. PPI interfaces, until recently, were considered undruggable. However, it is now believed that the interfaces contain \"hot spots,\" which could be targeted by small molecules. Such a strategy would require high-quality structural data of PPIs, which are difficult to obtain experimentally. Therefore, in silico modeling can complement or be an alternative to in vitro approaches. There are several computational methods for analyzing the structural data of the binding partners and modeling of the protein-protein dimer/oligomer structure. The major problem with in silico structure prediction of protein assemblies is obtaining sufficient sampling of protein dynamics. One of the methods that can take protein flexibility and the effects of the environment into account is Molecular Dynamics (MD). While sampling of the whole protein-protein association process with plain MD would be computationally expensive, there are several strategies to harness the method to PPI studies while maintaining reasonable use of resources. This chapter reviews known applications of MD in the PPI investigation workflows.

Molecular docking is used to anticipate the optimal orientation of a particular molecule to a target to form a stable complex. It makes predictions about the 3D structure of any complex based on the binding characteristics of the ligand and the target receptor usually a protein. It is an exceptionally useful tool, which is used as a model to study how ligands attach to proteins. Docking can also be used for studying the interaction of ligands and proteins to analyze inhibitory efficacy. The ligand may also be a protein, making it possible to study interactions between two different proteins using the numerous docking tools available for basic research on protein interactions. The protein-protein docking is a crucial approach to understanding the protein interactions and predicting the structure of protein complexes that have not yet been experimentally determined. Moreover, the protein-protein interactions can predict the function of target proteins and the drug-like properties of molecules. Therefore, protein docking assists in uncovering insights into protein interactions and also aids in a better understanding of molecular pathways/mechanisms. This chapter comprehends the various tools for protein-protein docking (pairwise and multiple), including their methodologies and analysis of output as results.

Proteins are the fundamental organic macromolecules in living systems that play a key role in a variety of biological functions including immunological detection, intracellular trafficking, and signal transduction. The docking of proteins has greatly advanced during recent decades and has become a crucial complement to experimental methods. Protein-protein docking is a helpful method for simulating protein complexes whose structures have not yet been solved experimentally. This chapter focuses on major search tactics along with various docking programs used in protein-protein docking algorithms, which include: direct search, exhaustive global search, local shape feature matching, randomized search, and broad category of post-docking approaches. As backbone flexibility predictions and interactions in high-resolution protein-protein docking remain important issues in the overall optimization context, we have put forward several methods and solutions used to handle backbone flexibility. In addition, various docking methods that are utilized for flexible backbone docking, including ATTRACT, FlexDock, FLIPDock, HADDOCK, RosettaDock, FiberDock, etc., along with their scoring functions, algorithms, advantages, and limitations are discussed. Moreover, what progress in search technology is expected, including not only the creation of new search algorithms but also the enhancement of existing ones, has been debated. As conformational flexibility is one of the most crucial factors affecting docking success, more work should be put into evaluating the conformational flexibility upon binding for a particular case in addition to developing new algorithms to replace the rigid body docking and scoring approach.