Prognostic accuracy

预后准确性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了急性IS患者血清ST2和钙卫蛋白的释放动力学。该研究包括NIH卒中量表评分≥8的急性IS患者(N=20)。在七个时间点进行采样:入院后(T0)和随后的24小时连续间隔(T1-T6)。使用改良的Rankin量表评估90天的主要结局:0-2表示良好,3-6表示不良功能结局。次要结果是90天后的全因死亡率。15名患者预后不佳,八个人死亡。结果显示,在T0时,良好和不良结果之间的ST2浓度存在统计学上的显着差异(p=0.04),T1(p=0.006),T2(p=0.01),T3(p=0.021),T4(p=0.007),T5(p=0.032),以及钙卫蛋白T6(p=0.034)。ST2在T1时的预后准确性最高,截止值>18.9µg/L(灵敏度为80%,特异性为100.0%),在T5时钙卫蛋白的截止值>4.5mg/L(灵敏度为64.3%,特异性为100.0%)。血清ST2和钙卫蛋白释放动力学显示了IS结果的有价值的预后准确性。
    This study investigated the releasing dynamics of serum ST2 and calprotectin in patients with acute IS. The study included acute IS patients (N = 20) with an NIH Stroke Scale score ≥8. Sampling was performed at seven time points: after admission (T0) and at the following 24 h consecutive intervals (T1-T6). Primary outcome at 90 days was evaluated using the modified Rankin scale: 0-2 for good and 3-6 for poor functional outcome. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality after 90 days. Fifteen patients had a poor outcome, and eight died. Results showed a statistically significant difference in ST2 concentrations between good and poor outcomes at T0 (p = 0.04), T1 (p = 0.006), T2 (p = 0.01), T3 (p = 0.021), T4 (p = 0.007), T5 (p = 0.032), and for calprotectin T6 (p = 0.034). Prognostic accuracy was highest for ST2 at T1 for a cut-off > 18.9 µg/L (sensitivity 80% and specificity 100.0%) and for calprotectin at T5 for a cut-off > 4.5 mg/L (sensitivity 64.3% and specificity 100.0%). Serum ST2 and calprotectin-releasing dynamics showed a valuable prognostic accuracy for IS outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳酸是脓毒症的常用生物标志物,尽管它在某些情况下有局限性,这表明需要新的生物标志物。我们评估了血浆肾素浓度和肾素活性对低灌注或低血压脓毒症患者死亡率和肾脏结局的诊断准确性。
    这是一个多中心,prospective,2021年9月至2022年10月,在三个三级急诊科接受治疗的117例感染性休克患者的观察性研究.肾素活性的准确性,肾素,和乳酸浓度预测28天死亡率,急性肾损伤(AKI),使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估肾脏替代需求。
    初始肾素活性的AUC,肾素,预测28天死亡率的乳酸浓度为0.66(95%置信区间[CI],0.55-0.77),0.63(95%CI,0.52-0.75),和0.65(95%CI,0.53-0.77),分别,24小时为0.74(95%CI,0.62-0.86),0.70(95%CI,0.56-0.83),和0.67(95%CI,0.54-0.79)。在预测14天内的AKI时,肾素浓度和肾素活性优于初始乳酸浓度。肾素和乳酸浓度的AUC分别为0.71(95%CI,0.61-0.80)和0.57(95%CI,0.46-0.67),分别为(P=0.030)。肾素活性的AUC(0.70;95%CI,0.60-0.80)也高于乳酸浓度(P=0.044)。
    肾素浓度和肾素活性在预测感染性休克患者28天死亡率方面表现与乳酸浓度相当,但在预测AKI方面表现优异。
    UNASSIGNED: Lactate is a commonly used biomarker for sepsis, although it has limitations in certain cases, suggesting the need for novel biomarkers. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of plasma renin concentration and renin activity for mortality and kidney outcomes in patients with sepsis with hypoperfusion or hypotension.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study of 117 patients with septic shock treated at three tertiary emergency departments between September 2021 and October 2022. The accuracy of renin activity, renin, and lactate concentrations in predicting 28-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal replacement requirement was assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The AUCs of initial renin activity, renin, and lactate concentrations for predicting 28-day mortality were 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.77), 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52-0.75), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.77), respectively, and those at 24 hrs were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.62-0.86), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.83), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79). Renin concentrations and renin activity outperformed initial lactate concentrations in predicting AKI within 14 days. The AUCs of renin and lactate concentrations were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.61-0.80) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.46-0.67), respectively (P=0.030). The AUC of renin activity (0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.80) was also higher than that of lactate concentration (P=0.044).
    UNASSIGNED: Renin concentration and renin activity show comparable performance to lactate concentration in predicting 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock but superior performance in predicting AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定了与非恶性脑实质相比,IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)组织中五种新型生物标志物候选物的表达,以及它们与GBM患者预后的相关性。通过免疫组织化学在肿瘤组织(n=186)和健康脑组织(n=54)中分析标志物。通过Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验评估与患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型确定标志物的预后价值。AGTRAP,DIVERSIN,与健康大脑相比,细胞质NEDD8(NEDD8c)和RRM1在肿瘤组织中明显过表达,而ALKBH3则相反。AGTRAP,单因素分析中ALKBH3、NEDD8c和RRM1与OS显著相关。在多因素分析中,AGTRAP和RRM1也是OS的独立预后因素。对于PFS,只有AGTRAP和NEDD8c在单因素分析中达到显著性。此外,AGTRAP是多变量模型中PFS的独立预后因素。最后,标记物的联合分析提高了其预后的准确性.AGTRAP/ALKBH3组合对GBM患者的OS具有最强的预后价值。这些发现有助于更好地理解GBM病理生理学,并可能有助于确定此类癌症的新治疗靶标。
    This study determined the expression of five novel biomarker candidates in IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) tissues compared to non-malign brain parenchyma, as well as their prognostic relevance for the GBM patients\' outcomes. The markers were analysed by immunohistochemistry in tumour tissues (n = 186) and healthy brain tissues (n = 54). The association with the patients\' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. The prognostic value of the markers was determined using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. AGTRAP, DIVERSIN, cytoplasmic NEDD8 (NEDD8c) and RRM1 were significantly overexpressed in tumour tissues compared to the healthy brain, while the opposite was observed for ALKBH3. AGTRAP, ALKBH3, NEDD8c and RRM1 were significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis. AGTRAP and RRM1 were also independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. For PFS, only AGTRAP and NEDD8c reached significance in univariate analysis. Additionally, AGTRAP was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in multivariate models. Finally, combined analysis of the markers enhanced their prognostic accuracy. The combination AGTRAP/ALKBH3 had the strongest prognostic value for the OS of GBM patients. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the GBM pathophysiology and may help identify novel therapeutic targets in this type of cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估临床检查的能力,生物标志物,电生理学和脑成像,单独或组合预测CA后6个月的良好神经系统预后。
    方法:这是韩国低温网络前瞻性注册1.0的回顾性分析,其中包括成人院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者(≥18岁)。良好的预后预测因子定义为入院时的瞳孔光反射(PLR)和角膜反射(CR)。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS-M)>3,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在24-72小时<17µg/L,正中神经体感诱发电位(SSEP)N20/P25振幅>4µV,脑电图(EEG)上无放电的连续背景,脑CT和弥散加权成像(DWI)无缺氧损伤。
    结果:最终分析共纳入1327名受试者,他们的平均年龄是59岁;其中,412名受试者在6个月时具有良好的神经结果。入院时GCS-M>3的特异性最高,为96.7%(95%CI95.3-97.8),正常脑DWI的敏感度最高,为96.3%(95%CI92.9-98.4)。当两个预测因子结合在一起时,敏感度呈下降趋势(范围为2.7-81.1%),特异性趋于增加,范围从81.3-100%。通过2021年欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)和欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)预测策略算法的探索性变化,预测了良好的结果,算法对患者的特异性为83.2%,灵敏度为83.5%。
    结论:临床检查,生物标志物,电生理学,脑成像预测CA后6个月的良好结果。当两个预测因子结合在一起时,特异性进一步提高。根据2021年ERC/ESICM指南,使用良好的结果预测算法可以减少不确定患者的数量和预测的不确定性。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of clinical examination, biomarkers, electrophysiology and brain imaging, individually or in combination to predict good neurological outcomes at 6 months after CA.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the Korean Hypothermia Network Prospective Registry 1.0, which included adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients (≥18 years). Good outcome predictors were defined as both pupillary light reflex (PLR) and corneal reflex (CR) at admission, Glasgow Coma Scale Motor score (GCS-M) >3 at admission, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) <17 µg/L at 24-72 h, a median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) N20/P25 amplitude >4 µV, continuous background without discharges on electroencephalogram (EEG), and absence of anoxic injury on brain CT and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
    RESULTS: A total of 1327 subjects were included in the final analysis, and their median age was 59 years; among them, 412 subjects had a good neurological outcome at 6 months. GCS-M >3 at admission had the highest specificity of 96.7% (95% CI 95.3-97.8), and normal brain DWI had the highest sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI 92.9-98.4). When the two predictors were combined, the sensitivities tended to decrease (ranging from 2.7-81.1%), and the specificities tended to increase, ranging from81.3-100%. Through the explorative variation of the 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) prognostication strategy algorithms, good outcomes were predicted, with a specificity of 83.2% and a sensitivity of 83.5% in patients by the algorithm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical examination, biomarker, electrophysiology, and brain imaging predicted good outcomes at 6 months after CA. When the two predictors were combined, the specificity further improved. With the 2021 ERC/ESICM guidelines, the number of indeterminate patients and the uncertainty of prognostication can be reduced by using a good outcome prediction algorithm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:慢性心肌损伤(CMI)定义为心肌肌钙蛋白T或I(cTnT或cTnI)的稳定浓度高于测定特异性第99百分位数参考上限(URL),并且信号结果较差。诊断CMI的临床意义尚不清楚。我们旨在使用三种不同的高灵敏度cTn(hs-cTn)测定法评估CMI的患病率和与长期预后的关联。
    方法:共有1,292例无急性心肌损伤的住院患者通过罗氏诊断的hs-cTn测定定量的cTn浓度,雅培诊断和西门子Healthineers。中位随访时间为4.1年。根据制造商提供的URL计算CMI的患病率以及死亡率和心血管(CV)事件的风险比,并与cTn较低百分位数(97.5、95或90)时的预后准确性进行比较。检测限或测定之间的估计生物等效浓度用作截止值.
    结果:作为连续变量分析的cTnT和cTnI之间的预后准确性没有重大差异。cTnT与cTnI的相关性较高(r=0.724-0.785),但是cTnT检测根据性别特异性URL诊断出患有CMI的患者多3.9-4.5倍(TnT,n=207;TnIAbbott,n=46,TnI西门子,n=53),在URL处具有更高的临床敏感性和AUC。
    结论:CMI的患病率高度依赖于分析。当作为连续变量测量时,cTnT和cTnI对死亡率或CV事件具有相似的预后准确性。然而,与根据cTnI的CMI诊断相比,根据cTnT的CMI诊断具有更高的预后准确性.
    OBJECTIVE: Chronic myocardial injury (CMI) is defined as stable concentrations of cardiac troponin T or I (cTnT or cTnI) above the assay-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) and signals poor outcome. The clinical implications of diagnosing CMI are unclear. We aimed to assess prevalence and association of CMI with long-term prognosis using three different high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays.
    METHODS: A total of 1,292 hospitalized patients without acute myocardial injury had cTn concentrations quantified by hs-cTn assays by Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens Healthineers. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years. The prevalence of CMI and hazard ratios for mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events were calculated based on the URL provided by the manufacturers and compared to the prognostic accuracy when lower percentiles of cTn (97.5, 95 or 90), limit of detection or the estimated bioequivalent concentrations between assays were used as cutoff values.
    RESULTS: There was no major difference in prognostic accuracy between cTnT and cTnI analyzed as continuous variables. The correlation between cTnT and cTnI was high (r=0.724-0.785), but the cTnT assay diagnosed 3.9-4.5 times more patients with having CMI based on the sex-specific URLs (TnT, n=207; TnI Abbott, n=46, TnI Siemens, n=53) and had higher clinical sensitivity and AUC at the URL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CMI is highly assay-dependent. cTnT and cTnI have similar prognostic accuracy for mortality or CV events when measured as continuous variables. However, a CMI diagnosis according to cTnT has higher prognostic accuracy compared to a CMI diagnosis according to cTnI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们比较了急诊(ED)合并脓毒性休克患者在脓毒症识别和复苏时的初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFAini)评分和最大SOFA评分(SOFAmax)在初始评分测量后24小时内的最差变量对院内死亡率的预测准确性。
    这是一项回顾性观察性研究,使用2015年10月至2019年12月在ED中对感染性休克患者进行多中心前瞻性登记。主要结果是院内死亡率。使用接受者工作特征(AUC)曲线下面积评估SOFAini和SOFAmax的预后准确性。
    共纳入4860名患者,住院死亡率为22.1%.在59.7%的患者中,与SOFAini相比,SOFAmax增加了,总SOFA评分的平均变化为2.0(标准差,2.3).根据总SOFA评分和SOFA分量评分,住院死亡率存在显着差异,心血管SOFA评分除外。SOFAmax的AUC(0.71;95%置信区间[CI],0.69-0.72)显著高于SOFAini(AUC,0.67;95%CI,0.66-0.69)用于预测住院死亡率。对于最大值,六个组分的所有得分的AUC较高。
    在感染性休克的ED患者中,识别脓毒症时的初始SOFA评分的预后准确性低于24小时最大SOFA评分。器官衰竭的后续评估可能会改善SOFA评分的差异,以预测死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: We compared the prognostic accuracy of in-hospital mortality of the initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFAini) score at the time of sepsis recognition and resuscitation and the maximum SOFA score (SOFAmax) using the worst variables in the 24 h after the initial score measurement in emergency department (ED) patients with septic shock.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective observational study using a multicenter prospective registry of septic shock patients in the ED between October 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The prognostic accuracies of SOFAini and SOFAmax were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4860 patients was included, and the in-hospital mortality was 22.1%. In 59.7% of patients, SOFAmax increased compared with SOFAini, and the mean change of total SOFA score was 2.0 (standard deviation, 2.3). There was a significant difference in in-hospital mortality according to total SOFA score and the SOFA component scores, except cardiovascular SOFA score. The AUC of SOFAmax (0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.72) was significantly higher than that of SOFAini (AUC, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.69) in predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUCs of all scores of the six components were higher for the maximum values.
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic accuracy of the initial SOFA score at the time of sepsis recognition was lower than the 24-h maximal SOFA score in ED patients with septic shock. Follow-up assessments of organ failure may improve discrimination of the SOFA score for predicting mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的存在是治疗性实体瘤的预后。研究已经在特定的“地标”或多个“监测”时间点评估了ctDNA。然而,可变的结果导致其临床有效性的不确定性。
    方法:PubMed搜索确定了相关研究,评估在根治性治疗后实体瘤的ctDNA监测。使用Peto方法计算每个研究的地标和监测时间点的复发几率(OR),并在荟萃分析中汇总。估计通过个体研究逆方差加权的集合敏感性和特异性,并利用逆方差加权的线性回归进行meta回归,以探索患者和肿瘤特征与疾病复发的OR之间的关联。
    结果:在确定的39项研究中,30项(1924例)和24项研究(1516例)分别报道了界标和监测时间点。地标复发的合并OR为15.47(95%CI11.84-20.22),监测时为31.0(95%CI23.9-40.2)。地标和监测分析对ctDNA的合并敏感性为58.3%和82.2%。相应的特异性为92%和94.1%。肿瘤不可知组的预后准确性较低,而界标分析的时间较长,预后准确性较高。监测抽奖次数和吸烟史。辅助化疗对标志特异性产生负面影响。
    结论:尽管ctDNA的预后准确性很高,灵敏度低,边界高特异性,因此,适度的辨别准确性,特别是对于具有里程碑意义的分析。需要具有适当的测试策略和测定参数的适当设计的临床试验来证明临床实用性。
    Presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is prognostic in solid tumors treated with curative intent. Studies have evaluated ctDNA at specific \"landmark\" or multiple \"surveillance\" time points. However, variable results have led to uncertainty about its clinical validity.
    A PubMed search identified relevant studies evaluating ctDNA monitoring in solid tumors after curative intent therapy. Odds ratios for recurrence at both landmark and surveillance time points for each study were calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Peto method. Pooled sensitivity and specificity weighted by individual study inverse variance were estimated and meta-regression using linear regression weighted by inverse variance was performed to explore associations between patient and tumor characteristics and the odds ratio for disease recurrence.
    Of 39 studies identified, 30 (1924 patients) and 24 studies (1516 patients) reported on landmark and surveillance time points, respectively. The pooled odds ratio for recurrence at landmark was 15.47 (95% confidence interval = 11.84 to 20.22) and at surveillance was 31.0 (95% confidence interval = 23.9 to 40.2). The pooled sensitivity for ctDNA at landmark and surveillance analyses was 58.3% and 82.2%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 92% and 94.1%, respectively. Prognostic accuracy was lower with tumor agnostic panels and higher with longer time to landmark analysis, number of surveillance draws, and smoking history. Adjuvant chemotherapy negatively affected landmark specificity.
    Although prognostic accuracy of ctDNA is high, it has low sensitivity, borderline high specificity, and therefore modest discriminatory accuracy, especially for landmark analyses. Adequately designed clinical trials with appropriate testing strategies and assay parameters are required to demonstrate clinical utility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:确定新型血清生物标志物在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者中的临床可行性目标温度管理(TTM)。
    方法:本研究是一项对接受TTM的OHCA患者进行的前瞻性观察性研究。我们测量了传统的生物标志物,神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100钙结合蛋白(S-100B),以及新的生物标志物,包括tau蛋白,神经丝轻链(NFL),胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP),和泛素C末端水解酶-L1(UCH-L1),在通过SIMOA免疫测定鉴定的自发循环恢复后0、24、48和72小时。主要结果是OHCA后6个月的神经学结果较差。
    结果:从2018年8月至2020年5月,本研究共纳入100例患者。在纳入的患者中,46例患者在OHCA后6个月有良好的神经系统预后。所有常规和新的血清生物标志物都能够区分好的和差的神经学结果组(p<0.001)。新的血清生物标志物的曲线下面积在心脏骤停(CA)后72小时最高(Tau为0.906,NFL为0.946,GFAP为0.875,UCH-L1为0.935)。CA后72小时的NFL敏感度最高(77.1%,95%CI59.9-89.6)在维持100%特异性的同时预测不良神经系统预后。
    结论:新的血清生物标志物可靠地预测了接受TTM治疗的OHCA患者在未停止维持生命治疗时的不良神经系统预后。在我们的研究中,对两项大型现有研究(TTM和COMACARE子研究)的截止值进行了外部验证。新生物标志物的预测能力在CA后72小时最高。
    To determine the clinical feasibility of novel serum biomarkers in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with target temperature management (TTM).
    This study was a prospective observational study conducted on OHCA patients who underwent TTM. We measured conventional biomarkers, neuron‑specific enolase and S100 calcium-binding protein (S-100B), as well as novel biomarkers, including tau protein, neurofilament light chain (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after the return of spontaneous circulation identified by SIMOA immunoassay. The primary outcome was poor neurological outcome at 6 months after OHCA.
    A total of 100 patients were included in this study from August 2018 to May 2020. Among the included patients, 46 patients had good neurologic outcomes at 6 months after OHCA. All conventional and novel serum biomarkers had the ability to discriminate between the good and poor neurological outcome groups (p < 0.001). The area under the curves of the novel serum biomarkers were highest at 72 h after cardiac arrest (CA) (0.906 for Tau, 0.946 for NFL, 0.875 for GFAP, and 0.935 for UCH-L1). The NFL at 72 h after CA had the highest sensitivity (77.1%, 95% CI 59.9-89.6) in predicting poor neurological outcomes while maintaining 100% specificity.
    Novel serum biomarkers reliably predicted poor neurological outcomes for patients with OHCA treated with TTM when life-sustaining therapy was not withdrawn. Cutoffs from two large existing studies (TTM and COMACARE substudy) were externally validated in our study. The predictive power of the novel biomarkers was the highest at 72 h after CA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:对败血症的认识和迅速认识对于在急诊科(ED)工作的护士至关重要,使他们能够对患者进行初步评估,然后根据他们的病情的严重程度对他们进行分类。这项系统评价的目的是通过比较以前的脓毒症-2筛查工具,来调查急诊科检测脓毒症的预后准确性。全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和目前的脓毒症-3筛查工具,快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)。
    方法:本系统评价使用Bettany-Saltikov和McSherry的指南,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)2020检查表的首选报告项目进行报告。该协议已在PROSPERO注册。使用CINAHL进行了系统的搜索,EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库。研究选择和偏倚风险由一对作者独立进行。
    结果:共5篇。总的来说,SIRS显示出比qSOFA更高的灵敏度,而qSOFA表现出比SIRS更高的特异性。qSOFA的阳性预测值优越,而qSOFA和SIRS之间的阴性预测值存在微小偏差。
    结论:基于纳入研究的总体建议表明,qSOFA是更适合在急诊科检测脓毒症预后准确性的筛查工具。
    Awareness and prompt recognition of sepsis are essential for nurses working in the emergency department (ED), enabling them to make an initial assessment of patients and then to sort them according to their condition s severity. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department by comparing the previous sepsis-2 screening tool, the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and the current sepsis-3 screening tool, the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).
    This systematic review used the guideline by Bettany-Saltikov and McSherry and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted using the CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Study selection and risk of bias was performed independently by pair of authors.
    Five articles were included. Overall, SIRS showed higher sensitivity than qSOFA, while qSOFA showed higher specificity than SIRS. The positive predictive value for qSOFA was superior, while there was a minor deviation in negative predictive value between qSOFA and SIRS.
    The overall recommendation based on the included studies indicates that qSOFA is the better-suited screening tool for prognostic accuracy in detecting sepsis in the emergency department.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数无源发热(FWS)的儿童需要进行诊断性实验室检查以排除严重的细菌感染(SBI)。通常是入院和经验性抗生素。由于患有病毒感染的发热儿童不太可能患有SBI,确定全身病毒感染患者可能有助于排除SBI.我们评估了血液中病毒的存在是否可以用作生物标志物以排除SBI。前瞻性招募<3岁的FWS儿童,并对血液中的腺病毒进行实时(逆转录)PCR,肠病毒,副病毒,HHV620/135名患者患有SBI,在47/135中,血液中至少检测到一种病毒。与CRP(65%和93%)和PCT(55%和90%)相比,病毒血症具有更高的敏感性和阴性预测值(90%和96%)以排除SBI。在非病毒血症患者中存在SBI的比值比(OR)为5.8(p=0.0225),CRP≥40mg/l(p=0.0009)为5.5,PCT≥0.5ng/mL(0.0093)为3.7。在调整CRP和PCT后,这仍然是显著的(OR分别为5.6和5.9;两者的p=0.03)。CRP和PCT的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.754和0.779。但分别增加到0.803和0.832,当合并病毒血症时。
    结论:在排除SBI方面,病毒血症的存在比常用的生物标志物具有更好的表现,并且可能与CRP和/或PCT联合用于FWS患儿的评估。较大的研究应评估通过血浆中(逆转录)PCR对病毒进行即时检测在FWS儿童管理算法中的作用。
    背景:•大多数FWS儿童患有病毒感染,但高达15%的人有SBI;大多数需要实验室测试,以及许多入院和经验性抗生素。•患有病毒感染的儿童不太可能患有SBI。
    背景:•患有全身性病毒感染的儿童不太可能患有SBI。•病毒血症比常用的生物标志物更好地预测SBI缺乏,并且可能与CRP和/或PCT一起用于评估FWS儿童。
    Most children with fever without source (FWS) require diagnostic laboratory tests to exclude a serious bacterial infection (SBI), often followed by admission and empirical antibiotics. As febrile children with a viral infection are less likely to have a SBI, identifying patients with systemic viral infection could contribute to exclude SBI. We evaluated whether the presence of virus in the blood could be used as a biomarker to rule out SBI. Children < 3 years old with FWS were prospectively enrolled and had real-time (reverse-transcription) PCR performed on the blood for adenovirus, enterovirus, parechovirus, and HHV6. 20/135 patients had SBI, and in 47/135, at least one virus was detected in the blood. Viremia had a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value (90% and 96%) to rule out SBI compared to CRP (65% and 93%) and PCT (55% and 90%). The odds ratio (OR) for the presence of SBI among non-viremic patients was 5.8 (p = 0.0225), compared to 5.5 for CRP ≥ 40 mg/l (p = 0.0009) and 3.7 for PCT ≥ 0.5 ng/mL (0.0093). This remained significant after adjusting for CRP and PCT (OR 5.6 and 5.9, respectively; p = 0.03 for both). Area under the ROC curve for CRP and PCT were 0.754 and 0.779, respectively, but increased to 0.803 and 0.832, respectively, when combined with viremia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The presence of viremia had a better performance than commonly used biomarkers to rule-out SBI and could potentially be used in conjunction with CRP and/or PCT in the evaluation of children with FWS. Larger studies should evaluate the role of point-of-care testing of viruses by (revere-transcription) PCR in the plasma in management algorithms of children with FWS.
    BACKGROUND: • Most children with FWS have a viral infection, but up to 15% have a SBI; most require laboratory tests, and many admission and empirical antibiotics. • Children with a viral infection are less likely to have a SBI.
    BACKGROUND: • Children with a systemic viral infection are less likely to have an SBI. • Viremia is a better predictor of absence of SBI than commonly used biomarkers and could potentially be used in conjunction with CRP and/or PCT in the evaluation of children with FWS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号