■专业身份形成(PIF)正在进行中,涉及思维习惯的自我反省过程,感觉和行为像一个医生,是医学教育的一个组成部分。虽然定性工作表明PIF是以专业精神为基础的,弹性,和领导,这方面缺乏定量工作。多种方法建立了严谨,本研究旨在定量评估专业精神的相对心理测量贡献,弹性,和领导结构来通知PIF,使用潜在因素分析方法。
■我们分析了PILLAR研究的数据,这是RCSI医学与健康科学大学的临床前医学生队列的在线横断面评估,都柏林,在每个感兴趣的领域使用已建立和验证的定量措施:PIF,敬业精神,领导力和韧性。共有76个项目,结合四个经过验证的量表,以及一系列人口统计问题,被使用。PIF的假设是,并与,敬业精神,通过对提出的三因素高阶模型进行验证性因子分析,检验了韧性和领导力.模型估计使用最大似然法(MLM)与地格曼旋转。假设(测量)模型与替代(饱和)模型进行了检验,以及三因素模型。
■来自1,311名学生的潜在变量分析表明,三因素高阶模型最适合数据;建议PIF由专业精神提供信息,弹性,和领导,这些结构在统计上是不同的,并解释了PIF的不同方面。这种高阶PIF模型的性能优于饱和模型和三因素模型。对哪个成分影响最大或最小的分析尚无定论,总体模型不受培训年份的影响。
■基于现有的概念争论,我们的研究是第一个定量支持专业精神贡献的研究,弹性,以及对职业认同发展的领导,并描述PIF与这些结构之间的相互关系。医学教育工作者可以在设计旨在增强PIF的课程和教育策略时使用此信息。未来的工作应该寻求纵向评估这些结构的影响。
UNASSIGNED: Professional identity formation (PIF) is an ongoing, self-reflective process involving habits of thinking, feeling and acting like a physician and is an integral component of medical education. While qualitative work has suggested that PIF is informed by
professionalism, resilience, and leadership, there is a dearth of quantitative work in this area. Multiple methods build rigor and the present study aimed to quantitatively assess the relative psychometric contributions of
professionalism, resilience, and leadership constructs to informing PIF, using a latent factor analysis approach.
UNASSIGNED: We analyzed data from the PILLAR study, which is an online cross-sectional assessment of a pre-clinical cohort of medical students in the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, using established and validated quantitative measures in each area of interest: PIF,
professionalism, leadership and resilience. A total of 76 items, combining four validated scales, along with a selection of demographic questions, were used. The hypothesis that PIF is informed by, and correlates with,
professionalism, resilience and leadership was examined by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis of a proposed three-factor higher-order model. Model estimation used Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM) with geomin rotation. The hypothesized (measurement) model was examined against an alternative (saturated) model, as well as a three-factor model.
UNASSIGNED: Latent variable analysis from 1,311 students demonstrated that a three-factor higher-order model best fit the data; suggesting PIF is informed by
professionalism, resilience, and leadership, and that these constructs are statistically distinct and account for differential aspects of PIF. This higher-order model of PIF outperformed both the saturated model and the three-factor model. The analysis of which component may be the most or least influential was inconclusive, and the overall model was not influenced by year of training.
UNASSIGNED: Building upon existing conceptual contentions, our study is the first to quantitatively support the contribution of professionalism, resilience, and leadership to the development of professional identity, and to delineate the inter-relationships between PIF and these constructs. This information can be used by medical educators when designing curricula and educational strategies intended to enhance PIF. Future work should seek to assess the influence of these constructs longitudinally.