Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) and Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenase-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are emerging melanoma biomarkers. We observed an inverse correlation between PRAME expression and 5hmC levels in benign nevi, melanoma in situ, primary invasive melanoma, and metastatic melanomas via immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence: nevi exhibited high 5hmC and low PRAME, whereas melanomas showed the opposite pattern. Single-cell multiplex imaging of melanoma precursors revealed that diminished 5hmC coincides with PRAME upregulation in premalignant cells. Analysis of TCGA and GTEx databases confirmed a negative relationship between TET2 and PRAME mRNA expression in melanoma. Additionally, 5hmC levels were reduced at the PRAME 5\' promoter in melanoma compared to nevi, suggesting a role for 5hmC in PRAME transcription. Restoring 5hmC levels via TET2 overexpression notably reduced PRAME expression in melanoma cell lines. These findings establish a function of TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation in regulating PRAME expression and demonstrate epigenetic reprogramming as pivotal in melanoma tumorigenesis.
UNASSIGNED: Melanoma biomarker PRAME expression is negatively regulated epigenetically by TET2-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS)-dysfunction disease. We previously reported that high PRAME transcript levels associated with unfavorable progression free survival (PFS) in patients with no bortezomib therapy, and bortezomib-containing regimen significantly improved PFS in patients with high PRAME transcript levels, which indicated that PRAME expression was prognostic for MM patients, and was related to proteasome inhibitor treatment. However, molecular mechanisms underlying the above clinical performance remain unclear. In the present study, MM cell models with PRAME knockdown and overexpression were established, and PRAME was identified to play the role of promoting proliferation in MM cells. P-Akt signaling was found to be activated as PRAME overexpressed. As a substrate recognizing subunit (SRS) of the E3 ubiquitin ligase, PRAME targets substrate proteins and mediates their degradation. CTMP and p21 were found to be the novel targets of PRAME in the Cul2-dependent substrate recognition process. PRAME interacted with and mediated ubiquitination and degradation of CTMP and p21, which led to accumulation of p-Akt and CCND3 proteins, and thus promoted cell proliferation and increased bortezomib sensitivity in MM cells.

BACKGROUND: PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown utility in differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of PRAME expression in dysplastic nevi (DN) and nevus-associated melanoma in situ (MIS).
METHODS: We included 172 DN and 38 nevus-associated MIS from our institutional archive. PRAME positive expression was defined as nuclear staining in at least 75% of melanocytes. In addition, relevant studies from PubMed and Web of Science were incorporated into a meta-analysis using the random-effects model to assess PRAME expression in MIS and DN.
RESULTS: Our institutional data revealed that 71.1% of nevus-associated MIS cases exhibited positive PRAME expression in the MIS components, whereas all DN components were negative for PRAME. 5.7% of cases diagnosed as DN in our cohort demonstrated diffuse positivity for PRAME. Notably, MIS associated with DN displaying epidermal and dermal components displayed a higher likelihood of PRAME positivity compared to those arising on a background of DN with solely epidermal (junctional) components (84% vs. 46%, p = 0.024). The meta-analysis indicated that the pooled PRAME positivity in MIS and DN was 54.5% and 1.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PRAME is a valuable immunohistochemical marker for differentiating MIS from DN, particularly in the context of nevus-associated MIS.

BACKGROUND: The Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunostain has seen significant diagnostic use in confirming malignancy for melanocytic lesions. However, the expression of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions have not been reported. In this study, PRAME staining was performed on a cohort of genital melanocytic lesions, aiming to investigate the diagnostic role of PRAME in genital melanocytic lesions and its expression in atypical genital nevi.
METHODS: A cohort including genital invasive melanoma, melanoma-in-situ, atypical genital nevus (AGN), compound nevus, intradermal nevus, blue nevus, lentigo and melanosis was retrieved with histology reviewed and PRAME immunostaining performed.
RESULTS: A total of 66 cases were reviewed. The average proportion expression of PRAME were 56.75 % and 57.43 % for invasive melanoma and melanoma-in-situ, with average H-scores of 153.5/300 and 163.14/300 respectively, which were greater than AGN (3.25 %, 7.75/300, p<0.001), compound/intradermal nevi, lentigo/melanosis, and background junctional melanocytes (<1 %, <1/300, p<0.001). The different cutoffs of PRAME expression, the sensitivity and specificity were 65.22 % and 100 % (>100/300); 69.57 % and 95.83 % (>10/300); and 82.61 % and 93.75 % (≥1/300) respectively. Low level PRAME expression was seen in half of the cases of AGN (n=2/4, 50 %), and at low cutoffs (>10/300 and ≥1/300) unable to differentiate invasive melanoma from AGN (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: For genital melanocytic lesions, PRAME immunostain shows high specificity at strong and diffuse staining. AGN not uncommonly display low level expression. Focal and/or weak PRAME expression should not be considered as an absolute indication of malignancy, and comprehensive histological assessment remains the key to accurate diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

Melanoma, with its diverse histopathologic characteristics, can mimic both benign nevi and neoplasms of various cell lineages. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play a vital role in melanoma diagnosis, particularly when the cell lineage is unclear on hematoxylin and eosin sections. Commonly utilized IHC stains for melanoma diagnosis include SOX10, Melan-A, and S100. A relatively novel stain, PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME), is also proving useful in accurate melanoma diagnosis. However, none of these stains are completely specific to melanocytes or melanoma, and misinterpretation can lead to incorrect diagnoses. This report presents a unique case of triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) metastatic to the skin exhibiting histopathologic characteristics similar to melanoma, including positivity for SOX10 and PRAME. Our aim is to highlight TNBC metastatic to the skin as a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Secondary malignancies are rare but devastating complications of longstanding burn scars. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common, followed by basal cell carcinoma and melanomas. There are fewer than 50 total reported cases of malignant melanomas arising in burn scars. We report a case of malignant melanoma arising within a longstanding burn scar confirmed by histology, FISH, and PRAME staining to further characterize melanomas arising in burn scars and to illustrate the diagnostic challenges they present.

Despite significant progress in targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), clinical outcomes are disappointing for elderly patients, patients with less fit disease characteristics, and patients with adverse disease risk characteristics. Over the past 10 years, adaptive T-cell immunotherapy has been recognized as a strategy for treating various malignant tumors. However, it has faced significant challenges in AML, primarily because myeloid blasts do not contain unique surface antigens. The preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer-testis antigen, is abnormally expressed in AML and does not exist in normal hematopoietic cells. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that PRAME is a useful target for treating AML. This paper reviews the structure and function of PRAME, its effects on normal cells and AML blasts, its implications in prognosis and follow-up, and its use in antigen-specific immunotherapy for AML.

Introduction: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly affect the head and neck areas in elderly patients, presenting as challenging ill-defined pigmented lesions with indistinct borders. Surgical margin determination for complete removal remains intricate due to these characteristics. Morphological examination of surgical margins is the key form of determining successful treatment in LM/LMM and underpin the greater margin control provided through the Slow Mohs micrographic surgery (SMMS) approach. Recent assessments have explored the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers, such as Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), to aid in LM/LMM and margin evaluation, leveraging the selectivity of PRAME labelling in malignant melanocytic neoplasms. Methods: A Novel double-labelling (DL) method incorporating both PRAME and MelanA IHC was employed to further maximise the clinical applicability of PRAME in the assessment of LM/LMM in SMMS biopsies. The evaluation involved 51 samples, comparing the results of the novel DL with respective single-labelling (SL) IHC slides. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant agreement of 96.1% between the DL method and SL slides across the tested samples. The benchmark PRAME SL exhibited a sensitivity of 91.3% in the SMMS specimens and 67.9% in histologically confirmed positive margins. Discussion: This study highlights the utility of PRAME IHC and by extension PRAME DL as an adjunctive tool in the assessment of melanocytic tumours within staged excision margins in SMMS samples.

BACKGROUND: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) has been introduced as a new melanoma marker and potential target for immunotherapy. While PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) is well documented in surgical pathology, similar data in cytology are limited. Metastatic melanoma is frequently diagnosed via cytology samples in which IHC plays an important role. We aimed to accordingly evaluate the performance of PRAME IHC in diagnosing metastatic melanoma in cytology samples relative to other commonly used melanoma markers.
METHODS: The study included 156 archival cytology cases, of which 93 were melanoma cases and 63 nonmelanoma cases (controls). All cases underwent PRAME IHC staining on cell blocks. Nuclear staining of PRAME was evaluated using a quantitative and qualitative scale. Other melanocytic IHC stain results (SOX10, S-100, Melan-A, and HMB45) were also documented.
RESULTS: PRAME was detected in tumor cells in 86% of melanoma cases, which was significantly lower than SOX10 (100%) (p < .01), and similar to HMB45 (84%) and Melan-A (82%). S-100 had the lowest sensitivity of 71%. In comparison to other types of melanomas, spindle cell melanoma exhibited higher negativity for PRAME IHC (4/10 = 40%). PRAME was also expressed in some nonmelanocytic malignancies including carcinoma (5/22 = 23%), sarcoma (5/15 = 33%), and hematologic malignancies (1/9 = 11%). Overall, PRAME showed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 70%, and negative predictive value of 92% for metastatic melanoma.
CONCLUSIONS: PRAME is a useful marker for the diagnosis of melanoma in cytology material, but it is less sensitive than SOX10. PRAME is also expressed in other nonmelanocytic tumors which limits its specificity.

Background/Objectives: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a member of the cancer testis antigen family, is a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Understanding the epigenetic mechanisms involved in the regulation of PRAME expression might be crucial for optimizing anti-PRAME treatments. Methods: Three malignancies of different lineages (sinonasal melanoma, testicular seminoma, and synovial sarcoma), in which immunohistochemical (IHC) reactivity for PRAME is a common yet variable feature, were studied. The expression of PRAME, ten-eleven translocation demethylase 1 (TET1), and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 3A and 3B were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Moreover, the expression of two epigenetic marks, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and histone 3 acetylation (H3ac), was tested. Results: All PRAME-positive tumors expressed medium-to-high levels of H3ac but differed considerably with respect to other markers. In seminomas, PRAME expression correlated with TET1, but in melanomas and synovial sarcomas, it correlated with both DNMTs and DNMT3A, respectively. Conclusions: PRAME expression was not determined by a balance between the global expression of DNA methylating/demethylating enzymes. However, histone acetylation may be one of the epigenetic mechanisms involved in PRAME regulation. Thus, the therapeutic combination of histone deacetylase inhibitors and PRAME immunotherapy merits further investigation.