Oxytocics

Oxytocics
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究检查了拉下子宫颈并将其填入阴道穹窿(PC-PVF)对子宫下段产后出血(PPH-LUS)的疗效。
    对2019年1月至2022年12月在两家三级医院阴道分娩后的所有PPH-LUS病例进行回顾性调查。保守治疗成功的患者仅分为常规治疗(40例),常规治疗+早期PC-PVF(33例),常规治疗+晚期PC-PVF(51例)组。常规治疗包括子宫按摩,子宫内膜,和氨甲环酸给药。通过比较分娩后24h内的出血量和出血率来评估治疗效果。
    总共124例患者接受了保守治疗,除了3例因子宫下段不完全破裂而在PC-PVF失败后进行剖腹止血的患者。仅常规治疗的疗效为44%(40/91),与PC-PVF联合用于PPH-LUS的疗效为100%。产妇年龄差异无统计学意义,孕周,新生儿体重,和阿普加得分。但常规治疗+早期PC-PVF组的总失血量(657.27ml±131.61ml)明显低于其他两组,分别为847.13ml±250.37ml(p<0.01)和1040.78ml±242.70ml(p<0.01),分别。常规治疗+早期PC-PVF组填塞后出血率明显下降。
    PC-PVF是PPH-LUS的安全有效治疗方法。早期识别PPH-LUS并及时应用PC-PVF可有效减少阴道分娩后的失血量。
    产后出血严重威胁孕产妇安全,仍是孕产妇死亡的主要原因。目前,阴道分娩后缺乏对PPH-LUS的早期识别和有针对性的保守治疗.仍然非常需要治疗PPH-LUS的创新,因为,根据目前可用的管理策略,结果仍然不一致,增加并发症的风险,基层医院的准入有限。根据临床数据统计和比较,事实证明,PC-PVF是一种简单的,快速,本研究采用非侵入性方法治疗阴道分娩后的PPH-LUS。由于其简单的技术要求,易于获取的材料,成本低,PC-PVF适用于各级医院。
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined the efficacy of pulling down the cervix and packing it in the vaginal fornix (PC-PVF) on postpartum hemorrhage in the lower uterine segment (PPH-LUS).
    UNASSIGNED: All cases of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery at two tertiary hospitals between January 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Patients treated successfully with conservative measures were divided into routine treatment only (40 patients), routine treatment + early PC-PVF (33 patients), and routine treatment + late PC-PVF (51 patients) groups. Routine treatment consisted of uterine massage, uterotonics, and tranexamic acid administration. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by comparing the volume and rate of bleeding within 24 h after delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 124 patients were treated conservatively, except for three patients who underwent laparotomy for hemostasis after PC-PVF failed for incomplete rupture of the lower uterine segment. The efficacy of treatment was 44% (40/91) for routine treatment only and 100% when combined with PC-PVF for PPH-LUS. There was no significant difference in maternal age, gestational week, neonatal weight, and Apgar score. But the total blood loss in the conventional treatment + early PC-PVF group (657.27 ml ± 131.61 ml) was significantly lower than that in the other two groups, which was 847.13 ml ± 250.37 ml(p < .01) and 1040.78 ml ± 242.70 ml (p < .01), respectively. The bleeding rate in the routine treatment + early PC-PVF group decreased significantly after tamponade.
    UNASSIGNED: PC-PVF is a safe and effective treatment for PPH-LUS. Early identification of PPH-LUS and prompt application of PC-PVF can effectively reduce blood loss after vaginal delivery.
    Postpartum hemorrhage is a serious threat to maternal safety and remains to be the leading cause of maternal death. At present, there is a lack of early identification and targeted conservative treatment of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery. Innovations for the treatment of PPH-LUS are still greatly needed because, with currently available management strategies, there is still inconsistency in outcomes, increased risk of complications, and limited access in primary hospitals. Based on clinical data statistics and comparison, it is proved that PC-PVF is a simple, rapid, and noninvasive method for the treatment of PPH-LUS after vaginal delivery in this study. Because of its simple technical requirements, easily accessible materials, and low cost, PC-PVF is suitable for hospitals at all levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    瑞典国家数据显示,在产科单位之间使用催产素来增加自发分娩的情况存在很大差异。这项研究旨在调查催产素增强的使用差异是否与母婴特征或临床因素有关。我们使用了队列设计,包括分配到Robson组1的女性(未分娩女性,孕周≥37+0,头部单胎分娩和自发分娩)和3(产妇,孕周≥37+0,头端单胎分娩,自发分娩,并且以前没有剖腹产)。使用具有边际标准化的粗逻辑回归模型和调整逻辑回归模型,以95%置信区间(CI)估计产科单位使用催产素的风险比(RR)和风险差异(RD)。进行了相互作用分析以研究硬膜外的潜在修饰作用。催产素的使用在Robson组1中在47%和73%之间变化,在Robson组3中在10%和33%之间变化。与瑞典其余地区相比,在Robson组1中,催产素增加的风险从低13%(RD-13.0,95%CI-15.5~10.6)到高14%(RD14.0,95%CI12.3~15.8),在Robson组3中从低6%(RD-5.6,95%CI-6.8~4.5)到高18%(RD17.9,95%CI16.5~19.4).在Robson3组硬膜外麻醉的女性中观察到了风险估计的最显著差异。总之,尽管对危险因素进行了调整,但催产素使用的差异仍然存在.这表明在临床实践中使用催产素存在不合理的差异。
    National Swedish data shows substantial variation in the use of oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labour between obstetric units. This study aimed to investigate if variations in the use of oxytocin augmentation are associated with maternal and infant characteristics or clinical factors. We used a cohort design including women allocated to Robson group 1 (nulliparous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour) and 3 (parous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of labour, and no previous caesarean birth). Crude and adjusted logistic regression models with marginal standardisation were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for oxytocin use by obstetric unit. An interaction analysis was performed to investigate the potential modifying effect of epidural. The use of oxytocin varied between 47 and 73% in Robson group 1, and 10% and 33% in Robson group 3. Compared to the remainder of Sweden, the risk of oxytocin augmentation ranged from 13% lower (RD - 13.0, 95% CI - 15.5 to - 10.6) to 14% higher (RD 14.0, 95% CI 12.3-15.8) in Robson group 1, and from 6% lower (RD - 5.6, 95% CI - 6.8 to - 4.5) to 18% higher (RD 17.9, 95% CI 16.5-19.4) in Robson group 3. The most notable differences in risk estimates were observed among women in Robson group 3 with epidural. In conclusion, variations in oxytocin use remained despite adjusting for risk factors. This indicates unjustified differences in use of oxytocin in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估在低风险孕妇人群中使用阴道米索前列醇引产的成功率和预测因素。
    方法:对196名孕妇进行了前瞻性队列研究。罗布森分类的第2组和第4组接受阴道米索前列醇引产(每6小时25μg片剂,多达4片,最长24小时)。引产的成功被认为是阴道分娩的成功。二元逻辑回归用于确定阴道米索前列醇成功引产的最佳预测因素。
    结果:在分析的所有孕妇中,140例(71.4%)成功,56例(28.6%)不成功。成功引产的孕妇怀孕次数较多(1.69vs.1.36,p=0.023),较高的交货数量(0.57与0.19,p<0.001),更高的Bishop分数(2.0vs.1.38,p=0.002),和更低的米索前列醇25μg片剂(2.18vs.2.57,p=0.031)。以前没有分娩[x2(1)=3.14,比值比(OR):0.24,95%置信区间(CI):0.10-0.57,R2Nagelkerke:0.91,p=0.001]和以前一次分娩的存在[x2(1)=6.0,OR:3.40,95%CI:1.13-10.16,R2Nagelkerke:0.043,p=0.029]是阴道前列腺醇成功引产的
    结论:在低风险人群中观察到使用阴道米索前列醇的引产成功率很高,主要发生在经胎和胎龄>41周。以前没有分娩降低了引产的成功率,而之前的一次分娩增加了引产的成功率。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and predictors of labor induction using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.
    METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with 196 pregnant women. Groups 2 and 4 of the Robson Classification admitted for induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol (25 μg tablets every 6 h, up to 4 tablets, for a maximum of 24 h). The success of labor induction was considered the achievement of vaginal delivery. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.
    RESULTS: Of all the pregnant women analyzed, 140 (71.4%) were successful and 56 (28.6%) were unsuccessful. Pregnant women who achieved successful induction had a higher number of pregnancies (1.69 vs. 1.36, p=0.023), a higher number of deliveries (0.57 vs. 0.19, p<0.001), a higher Bishop score (2.0 vs. 1.38, p=0.002), and lower misoprostol 25 μg tablets (2.18 vs. 2.57, p=0.031). No previous deliveries [x2(1)=3.14, odds ratio (OR): 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-0.57, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.91, p=0.001] and the presence of one previous delivery [x2(1)=6.0, OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.13-10.16, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.043, p=0.029] were significant predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol.
    CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of labor induction success using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk population was observed, mainly in multiparous and with gestational age>41 weeks. No previous delivery decreased the success of labor induction, while one previous delivery increased the success of labor induction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨阴道地诺前列酮的并发症和妊娠结局Cook的双球囊用于足月妊娠合并小于胎龄(SGA)的引产。
    这项回顾性研究包括2017年1月至2021年12月在福建省妇幼保健院接受SGA治疗的连续单胎妊娠。根据所接受的诱导方法将患者分为Cook's双球囊组和地诺前列酮组。主要结果是阴道分娩。
    这项研究包括318名妇女[165名(年龄30.25±4.72岁)和153名(年龄28.80±3.91岁)在地诺前列酮和库克的气球组]。地诺前列酮组的阴道分娩率高于库克气球组(83.6%vs.71.9%,p=.012)。宫颈成熟持续时间(9.73±4.82vs.17.50±8.77h,p<.001)和诱导至分娩持续时间(22.11±8.13vs.与Cook\'s气球组相比,地诺前列酮组的30.27±12.28,p<.001)显着缩短。与库克气球组相比,地诺前列酮组需要输注催产素的女性较少(32.7%vs.86.3%,p<.001)。地诺前列酮与阴道分娩独立相关(HR=1.756,95CI:1.286-2.399,p=.000)。地诺前列酮组的子宫收缩和胎膜自发性破裂的发生率明显高于Cook\'s球囊组(10.3%vs.0.7%,p<.001;7.3%与1.3%,p=.012)。两组产妇并发症及新生儿结局差异无统计学意义。
    在妊娠合并SGA的孕妇中,使用地诺前列酮的宫颈成熟比使用Cook\'s气球的宫颈成熟更有可能实现阴道分娩,并具有良好的并发症特征。
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the complications and pregnancy outcomes of vaginal dinoprostone vs. Cook\'s double balloon for the induction of labor among pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age (SGA) at term.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by SGA treated at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into the Cook\'s double balloon and dinoprostone groups according to the induction method they received. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 318 women [165 (aged 30.25 ± 4.72 years) and 153 (aged 28.80 ± 3.91 years) in the dinoprostone and Cook\'s balloon groups]. The dinoprostone group had a higher vaginal delivery rate than the Cook\'s balloon group (83.6% vs. 71.9%, p = .012). The cervical ripening duration (9.73 ± 4.82 vs. 17.50 ± 8.77 h, p < .001) and induction to delivery duration (22.11 ± 8.13 vs. 30.27 ± 12.28, p < .001) were significantly shorter in the dinoprostone group compared with the Cook\'s balloon group. Less women needed oxytocin infusion in the dinoprostone group compared with that in the Cook\'s balloon group (32.7% vs. 86.3%, p < .001). Dinoprostone was independently associated with vaginal delivery (HR = 1.756, 95%CI: 1.286-2.399, p = .000). The rates of uterine tachysystole and spontaneous rupture of the fetal membrane were significantly higher in the dinoprostone group than that in the Cook\'s balloon group (10.3% vs. 0.7%, p < .001; 7.3% vs. 1.3%, p = .012). There were no differences in maternal complications and neonatal outcomes between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: In pregnant woman with pregnancies complicated by SGA, cervical ripening using dinoprostone were more likely to achieve vaginal delivery than those with Cook\'s balloon, and with a favorable complication profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们评估了不同产科干预措施和分娩类型对母乳喂养的影响。
    方法:定量,横断面研究使用在线问卷进行.数据收集于2021年在匈牙利进行。我们包括在家中抚养至少5岁孩子的亲生母亲(N=2,008)。问卷是匿名和自愿填写的。除了社会人口统计数据(年龄,residence,婚姻状况,教育,职业,收入状况,亲生孩子的数量,以及关于孩子和母亲的人体测量问题),我们询问了分娩过程中使用的干预措施,以及婴儿喂养的不同方式。使用MicrosoftExcel365和SPSS25.0进行统计学分析。描述性统计,双样本t检验,χ2检验和方差分析用于分析变量之间的关系或差异(p<0.05)。
    结果:我们发现,在合成催产素用于诱导和加速的分娩中,急诊剖宫产的发生率较高。然而,在催产素给药仅仅是为了加速分娩的情况下,阴道分娩的发生率明显较高(p<0.001).接受合成催产素的母亲也接受了镇痛药(p<0.001)。使用催产素自然分娩的妇女在分娩室母乳喂养新生儿的成功率较低(p<0.001)。接受产科镇痛的母亲的孩子具有更高的补充配方喂养率(p<0.001)。自然出生的新生儿在分娩室的母乳喂养率较高(p<0.001),在医院的配方喂养率较低(p<0.001)。在分娩室母乳喂养的婴儿母乳喂养时间更长(p<0.001)。对于自然出生的婴儿,纯母乳喂养长达六个月(p=0.005)。但母乳喂养时间没有差异(p=0.081).
    结论:产科干预可能会增加对进一步干预的需求,并对早期或成功母乳喂养产生负面影响。
    背景:不相关。
    BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of different obstetric interventions and types of delivery on breastfeeding.
    METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire. Data collection was performed in 2021 in Hungary. We included biological mothers who had raised their at least 5-year-old child(ren) at home (N = 2,008). The questionnaire was completed anonymously and voluntarily. In addition to sociodemographic data (age, residence, marital status, education, occupation, income status, number of biological children, and anthropometric questions about the child and the mother), we asked about the interventions used during childbirth, and the different ways of infant feeding used. Statistical analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel 365 and SPSS 25.0. Descriptive statistics, two-sample t tests, χ2 tests and ANOVA were used to analyse the relationship or differences between the variables (p < 0,05).
    RESULTS: We found that in deliveries where synthetic oxytocin was used for both induction and acceleration, there was a higher incidence of emergency cesarean section. However, the occurrence of vaginal deliveries was significantly higher in cases where oxytocin administration was solely for the purpose of accelerating labour (p < 0.001).Mothers who received synthetic oxytocin also received analgesics (p < 0.001). Women giving birth naturally who used oxytocin had a lower success of breastfeeding their newborn in the delivery room (p < 0.001). Children of mothers who received obstetric analgesia had a higher rate of complementary formula feeding (p < 0.001). Newborns born naturally had a higher rate of breastfeeding in the delivery room (p < 0.001) and less formula feeding in the hospital (p < 0.001). Infants who were breastfed in the delivery room were breastfed for longer periods (p < 0.001). Exclusive breastfeeding up to six months was longer for infants born naturally (p = 0.005), but there was no difference in the length of breastfeeding (p = 0.081).
    CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric interventions may increase the need for further interventions and have a negative impact on early or successful breastfeeding.
    BACKGROUND: Not relevant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了比较宫颈成熟时间与使用阴道米索前列醇加Hyoscine-N-丁基溴,单独使用米索前列醇阴道。
    一项双盲随机对照试验,泛非临床试验注册(PACTR)批准号为PACTR202112821475292。
    联邦医疗中心,Asaba,尼日利亚。
    共纳入126名符合产前宫颈成熟的患者。
    A组的参与者有25微克阴道米索前列醇和1毫升肌内安慰剂,B组中的患者有25µg阴道米索前列醇和20mg肌内Hyoscine(1ml)。当需要时使用催产素输注,劳动按照部门协议进行监督。
    宫颈成熟时间。
    hyoscine组的平均宫颈成熟时间(8.48±4.36小时)明显短于安慰剂组(11.40±7.33小时);p值0.02,95%CI0.80-5.05。A组(7.38±5.28小时)平均诱导-分娩间期与B组(7.75±5.04小时)比较,差异无统计学意义,值为0.54。交付方式具有可比性。然而,B组女性(53,84.1%)的阴道分娩率高于A组女性(50,79.4%);p值0.49.甲组13名妇女(20.6%)剖腹产,B组中有10名妇女(15.9%)进行了剖腹产(p值0.49,RR0.94,CI0.80-1.11)。两组间不良母婴结局无统计学意义。
    当用作阴道米索前列醇的辅助药物时,肌内hyoscine可有效减少宫颈成熟时间,没有明显的不良母婴结局。
    没有声明。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare cervical ripening time with the use of vaginal Misoprostol plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide, with vaginal Misoprostol alone.
    UNASSIGNED: A double-blind randomized controlled trial with Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) approval number PACTR202112821475292.
    UNASSIGNED: Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 126 eligible antenatal patients for cervical ripening were enrolled.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants in Group A had 25µg of vaginal misoprostol with 1ml of intramuscular placebo, and those in Group B had 25µg of vaginal misoprostol with 20mg of Intramuscular Hyoscine (1 ml). Oxytocin infusion was used when indicated, and the labour was supervised as per departmental protocol.
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical ripening time.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean cervical ripening time was statistically significantly shorter in the hyoscine group (8.48±4.36 hours) than in the placebo group (11.40±7.33 hours); p-value 0.02, 95% CI 0.80-5.05. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean induction-delivery interval in Group A (7.38±5.28 hours) compared to Group B (7.75±5.04 hours), with a value of 0.54. The mode of delivery was comparable. However, women in Group B (53, 84.1%) achieved more vaginal deliveries than women in Group A (50, 79.4%); p-value 0.49. Thirteen women in Group A (20.6%) had a caesarean section, while ten women (15.9%) in Group B had a caesarean section (p-value 0.49, RR 0.94, CI 0.80-1.11). Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not statistically significant between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Intramuscular hyoscine was effective in reducing cervical ripening time when used as an adjunct to vaginal Misoprostol, with no significant adverse maternal or neonatal outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: None declared.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们的目的是评估在我们的机构中使用的10IUIM(肌层内)和10IUIV(静脉内)催产素与卡贝缩宫素IV联合预防选择性剖宫产产后严重失血的独特方法的非劣效性。该设计是一项前瞻性对照IV期非劣效性介入试验。设置是大学医院的三级中心,苏黎世,瑞士。
    方法:该人群由550名妇女组成,她们在妊娠36周后接受选择性剖宫产,产后出血(PPH)风险较低。受试者被分配到联合催产素方案(10IUIM和10IUIV)或卡贝缩宫素(100μgIV)。使用Newcombe-Wilson评分法评估重度PPH的催产素的非劣效性为0.05。主要结局指标是严重的产后失血,定义为δ血红蛋白(ΔHb,产前Hb-产后Hb)≥30g/L
    结果:未显示联合催产素(IM/IV)预防严重产后失血的非劣效性(催产素组17名妇女与卡贝缩宫素组中的7)。使用卡贝缩宫素时需要治疗的人数为28。ΔHb≥30g/L的风险差异为0.04(催产素0.06与0.03),95%置信区间(CI)(0.00-0.08)。ΔHb没有观察到显著差异(中位数12[IQR7.0-19.0]与11[5.0–17.0],p=0.07),估计失血量(中位数500[IQR400-600]vs.500[400-575],p=0.38),或PPH率定义为估计失血≥1000mL(12[4.5]vs.5[2.0],风险差异0.03,95%CI(-0.01至0.06),p=0.16)。与卡贝缩宫素组相比,催产素组给予更多额外的子宫收缩剂(15.2%vs.5.9%,p=0.001)。催产素组的总病例费用没有显着差异(US$10146vs.9621,平均差471.4,CI(-476.5至1419.3),p=0.33)。
    结论:联合(IM/IV)催产素在选择性剖宫产中严重产后失血(定义为产后Hb下降≥30g/L)方面并不劣于卡贝缩宫素。我们建议将卡贝缩宫素用于选择性剖宫产的临床实践。
    BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess non-inferiority of the unique approach used in our institution of combined 10 IU IM (intramyometrial) and 10 IU IV (intravenous) oxytocin to carbetocin IV in preventing severe postpartum blood loss in elective cesarean sections. The design was a prospective controlled phase IV non-inferiority interventional trial. The setting was a tertiary center at University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
    METHODS: The population consisted of 550 women undergoing elective cesarean section after 36 completed weeks of gestation at low risk for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Participants were assigned to either combined oxytocin regimen (10 IU IM and 10 IU IV) or carbetocin (100 μg IV). Non-inferiority for oxytocin for severe PPH was assessed with a 0.05 margin using the Newcombe-Wilson score method. The main outcome measures were severe postpartum blood loss defined as delta hemoglobin (∆Hb, Hb prepartum-Hb postpartum) ≥30 g/L.
    RESULTS: Non-inferiority of combined oxytocin (IM/IV) in preventing severe postpartum blood loss was not shown (17 women in the oxytocin group vs. 7 in the carbetocin group). The number needed to treat when using carbetocin was 28. The risk difference for ∆Hb ≥30 g/L was 0.04 (oxytocin 0.06 vs. 0.03), 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.00-0.08). No significant difference was observed for ∆Hb (median 12 [IQR 7.0-19.0] vs. 11 [5.0-17.0], p = 0.07), estimated blood loss (median 500 [IQR 400-600] vs. 500 [400-575], p = 0.38), or the PPH rate defined as estimated blood loss ≥1000 mL (12[4.5] vs. 5 [2.0], risk difference 0.03, 95% CI (-0.01 to 0.06), p = 0.16). More additional uterotonics were administered in the oxytocin group compared to the carbetocin group (15.2% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.001). Total case costs were non-significantly different in the oxytocin group (US $ 10 146 vs. 9621, mean difference 471.4, CI (-476.5 to 1419.3), p = 0.33).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined (IM/IV) oxytocin is not non-inferior to carbetocin regarding severe postpartum blood loss defined as postpartum Hb decrease ≥30 g/L in elective cesarean sections. We recommend carbetocin for use in clinical practice for elective cesarean sections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球引产和剖宫产率正在上升。随着这些趋势的融合,剖宫产后的引产率高达27-32.7%。一次剖宫产(IOLAC)后引产是一种高风险的手术,主要是由于子宫破裂的风险较高。然而,美国妇产科医师学会将IOLAC视为在适当护理环境中积极且知情的女性的一种选择.我们试图确定IOLAC后孕产妇和新生儿不良结局的综合预测因子。
    方法:对2018年1月至2022年9月在马来西亚大学医院分娩的妇女的电子病历进行了筛查,以识别IOLAC病例。如果这11种不良结局中至少有一种分娩失血≥1000ml,则将病例归类为复合不良结局。子宫瘢痕并发症,脐带脱垂或表现,胎盘早剥,产妇发热(≥38℃),绒毛膜羊膜炎,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,5分钟时Apgar评分<7,脐动脉脐带血pH<7.1或碱过量≤-12mmol/l,新生儿ICU入院。非计划剖宫产不被认为是不良结局,因为临床上指示的IOLAC的实际管理选择是计划剖宫产。对参与者的特征进行了双变量分析,以确定其与复合不良结局相关的预测因素。将双变量分析中粗p<0.10的特征纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析模型。
    结果:筛查了19,064名女性的电子病历。确定了819例IOLAC和98例复合不良结局。产妇身高,种族,以前的阴道分娩,先前剖宫产的指征,IOLAC的适应症,和IOLAC方法在双变量分析中p<0.10,并纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析。调整后,与Foley球囊相比,仅通过阴道地诺前列酮的产妇身高和IOLAC在p<0.05处保持显着。包括所有非计划剖宫产作为复合不良结局的附加限定符的事后调整分析显示,体重指数较高,身材矮小(<157厘米),不是中国人,之前没有阴道分娩,先前的剖宫产表明分娩难产,Bishop评分较差(<6)是复合不良结局扩大的独立预测因子.
    结论:与Foley球囊相比,阴道地诺前列酮的女性矮小和IOLAC可独立预测不良结局的复合。
    身材矮小和地诺前列酮引产是孕产妇-新生儿复合不良结局的独立预测因素,不包括计划外剖宫产。
    BACKGROUND: The rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery is rising worldwide. With the confluence of these trends, the labor induction rate in trials of labor after cesarean can be as high as 27-32.7%. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) is a high-risk procedure mainly due to the higher risk of uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers IOLAC as an option in motivated and informed women in the appropriate care setting. We sought to identify predictors of a composite of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes following IOLAC.
    METHODS: The electronic medical records of women who delivered between January 2018 to September 2022 in a Malaysian university hospital were screened to identify cases of IOLAC. A case is classified as a composite adverse outcome if at least one of these 11 adverse outcomes of delivery blood loss ≥ 1000 ml, uterine scar complications, cord prolapse or presentation, placenta abruption, maternal fever (≥ 38 0C), chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical artery cord artery blood pH < 7.1 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/l, and neonatal ICU admission was present. An unplanned cesarean delivery was not considered an adverse outcome as the practical management alternative for a clinically indicated IOLAC was a planned cesarean. Bivariate analysis of participants\' characteristics was performed to identify predictors of their association with composite adverse outcome. Characteristics with crude p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis model.
    RESULTS: Electronic medical records of 19,064 women were screened. 819 IOLAC cases and 98 cases with composite adverse outcomes were identified. Maternal height, ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, indication of previous cesarean, indication for IOLAC, and method of IOLAC had p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis and were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. After adjustment, only maternal height and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon remained significant at p < 0.05. Post hoc adjusted analysis that included all unplanned cesarean as an added qualifier for composite adverse outcome showed higher body mass index, short stature (< 157 cm), not of Chinese ethnicity, no prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean indicated by labor dystocia, and less favorable Bishop score (< 6) were independent predictors of the expanded composite adverse outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Shorter women and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon were independently predictive of composite of adverse outcome.
    Shorter stature and dinoprostone labor induction are independent predictors of a composite maternal-newborn adverse outcome excluding unplanned cesarean delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估催产素增加与产后出血之间的相关性。
    PubMed,WebofScience,截至2024年1月24日,Scopus已经搜索了评估催产素增加与产后出血之间相关性的研究。搜索策略包括与PPH和催产素增强相关的相关关键词。偏见的风险评估是由两名审阅者使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行的。为了汇集纳入研究的影响大小,使用了感兴趣结果的优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。
    本荟萃分析包括8项研究。纳入研究的汇总分析显示,催产素增强与PPH几率增加之间存在统计学上的显着关联(汇总优势比[OR]=1.27,95%置信区间[CI]:1.05-1.53;I2=84.94%;p=0.01)。使用漏斗图评估出版偏倚,看起来相对不对称,表明显著的发表偏倚。Galbraith图和修剪和填充图用于出版偏见。敏感性分析采用留一法进行。
    这项荟萃分析表明,使用催产素进行分娩与PPH风险的显着增加有关。它强调了在使用催产素时需要仔细监测和考虑,特别是在指导和监督至关重要的中低收入国家。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study aims to evaluate the correlation between oxytocin augmentation and postpartum hemorrhage.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus has been searched for studies assessing the correlation between oxytocin augmentation and postpartum hemorrhage up to January 24, 2024. The search strategy included relevant keywords related to PPH and oxytocin augmentation. The risk of bias assessment was conducted by two reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). To pool the effects sized of included studies odds ratios (OR) of interest outcome with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were used.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of the included studies showed a statistically significant association between oxytocin augmentation and increased odds of PPH (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.53; I2 = 84.94%; p = 0.01). Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, which appeared relatively asymmetrical, indicating significant publication bias. Galbraith plot and trim and fill plot were used for publication bias. Sensitivity analyses were performed by leave one out method.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis suggests that using oxytocin for labor augmentation is linked to a significant increase in the risk of PPH. It highlights the need for careful monitoring and consideration when using oxytocin, especially in low and middle-income countries where guidelines and supervision are crucial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内使用催产素进行引产和增加分娩的做法正在增加,临床使用的差异很大,尤其是剂量给药。还有证据表明,未经授权的工作人员在分时使用。
    目的:本研究评估了产时使用催产素的频率,诱导和增加分娩的剂量和给药途径,并确定了尼日利亚医疗保健提供者使用催产素诱导和增加劳动力的预测因素。
    方法:这是一项在医疗保健提供者-医生中进行的横断面研究,全国六个地缘政治地区的公共和私人医疗机构中的护士/助产士和社区卫生工作者(CHW)。使用多阶段采样技术选择了6,299名合格的医疗保健提供者,他们在分娩和分娩期间为孕妇使用催产素。采用自编问卷收集相关数据,采用STATA17统计软件进行分析。进行了总结和推论统计,并使用多变量回归模型进行了进一步分析,以确定产时催产素使用正确模式的独立预测变量。P值设定为<0.05。
    结果:在参与研究的6299名受访者中,1179(18.7%),3362(53.4%),1758名(27.9%)是医生,护士/助产士和CHW,分别。在受访者中,4200(66.7%)使用催产素来增加分娩,而3314(52.6%)使用催产素来引产。在1758年的CHW中,37.8%和49%的人使用催产素来诱导和增加分娩,分别。使用催产素诱导或增加分娩的受访者中约有10%不正确地使用肌内给药途径,约8%不正确地使用静脉推挤。作为一名医生,来自政府医疗机构的医疗保健提供者是正确剂量催产素用于引产和增加分娩的独立阳性预测因子。CHW最有可能使用错误的催产素给药途径和剂量来诱导和增加分娩。
    结论:我们的研究揭示了尼日利亚医疗保健提供者在产时使用催产素的临床实践-产时使用催产素的患病率,不适当的引产和增加劳动力的管理途径,不同的和不适当的高起始剂量的给药,包括CHW中未经授权的和高的产时使用催产素。
    BACKGROUND: The practice of intrapartum use of oxytocin for induction and augmentation of labour is increasing worldwide with documented wide variations in clinical use, especially dose administrations. There is also evidence of intrapartum use by unauthorized cadre of staff.
    OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the patterns - frequency of intrapartum use of oxytocin, the doses and routes of administration for induction and augmentation of labour, and identified the predictors of oxytocin use for induction and augmentation of labour by healthcare providers in Nigeria.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among healthcare providers - doctors, nurses/midwives and community health workers (CHWs) in public and private healthcare facilities across the country\'s six geopolitical zones. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 6,299 eligible healthcare providers who use oxytocin for pregnant women during labour and delivery. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect relevant data and analysed using STATA 17 statistical software. Summary and inferential statistics were done and further analyses using multivariable regression models were performed to ascertain independent predictor variables of correct patterns of intrapartum oxytocin usage. The p-value was set at < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Of the 6299 respondents who participated in the study, 1179 (18.7%), 3362 (53.4%), and 1758 (27.9%) were doctors, nurses/midwives and CHWs, respectively. Among the respondents, 4200 (66.7%) use oxytocin for augmentation of labour while 3314 (52.6%) use it for induction of labour. Of the 1758 CHWs, 37.8% and 49% use oxytocin for induction and augmentation of labour, respectively. About 10% of the respondents who use oxytocin for the induction or augmentation of labour incorrectly use the intramuscular route of administration and about 8% incorrectly use intravenous push. Being a doctor, and a healthcare provider from government health facilities were independent positive predictors of the administration of correct dose oxytocin for induction and augmentation of labour. The CHWs were most likely to use the wrong route and dose administration of oxytocin for the induction and augmentation of labour.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study unveiled a concerning clinical practice of intrapartum oxytocin use by healthcare providers in Nigeria - prevalence of intrapartum use of oxytocin, inappropriate routes of administration for induction and augmentation of labour, varied and inappropriately high start dose of administration including unauthorized and high intrapartum use of oxytocin among CHWs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号