背景:全球引产和剖宫产率正在上升。随着这些趋势的融合,剖宫产后的引产率高达27-32.7%。一次剖宫产(IOLAC)后引产是一种高风险的手术,主要是由于子宫破裂的风险较高。然而,美国妇产科医师学会将IOLAC视为在适当护理环境中积极且知情的女性的一种选择.我们试图确定IOLAC后孕产妇和新生儿不良结局的综合预测因子。
方法:对2018年1月至2022年9月在马来西亚大学医院分娩的妇女的电子病历进行了筛查,以识别IOLAC病例。如果这11种不良结局中至少有一种分娩失血≥1000ml,则将病例归类为复合不良结局。子宫瘢痕并发症,脐带脱垂或表现,胎盘早剥,产妇发热(≥38℃),绒毛膜羊膜炎,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,5分钟时Apgar评分<7,脐动脉脐带血pH<7.1或碱过量≤-12mmol/l,新生儿ICU入院。非计划剖宫产不被认为是不良结局,因为临床上指示的IOLAC的实际管理选择是计划剖宫产。对参与者的特征进行了双变量分析,以确定其与复合不良结局相关的预测因素。将双变量分析中粗p<0.10的特征纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析模型。
结果:筛查了19,064名女性的电子病历。确定了819例IOLAC和98例复合不良结局。产妇身高,种族,以前的阴道分娩,先前剖宫产的指征,IOLAC的适应症,和IOLAC方法在双变量分析中p<0.10,并纳入多变量二元逻辑回归分析。调整后,与Foley球囊相比,仅通过阴道地诺前列酮的产妇身高和IOLAC在p<0.05处保持显着。包括所有非计划剖宫产作为复合不良结局的附加限定符的事后调整分析显示,体重指数较高,身材矮小(<157厘米),不是中国人,之前没有阴道分娩,先前的剖宫产表明分娩难产,Bishop评分较差(<6)是复合不良结局扩大的独立预测因子.
结论:与Foley球囊相比,阴道地诺前列酮的女性矮小和IOLAC可独立预测不良结局的复合。
身材矮小和地诺前列酮引产是孕产妇-新生儿复合不良结局的独立预测因素,不包括计划外剖宫产。
BACKGROUND: The rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery is rising worldwide. With the confluence of these trends, the labor induction rate in trials of labor after cesarean can be as high as 27-32.7%. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) is a high-risk procedure mainly due to the higher risk of uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers IOLAC as an option in motivated and informed women in the appropriate care setting. We sought to identify predictors of a composite of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes following IOLAC.
METHODS: The electronic medical records of women who delivered between January 2018 to September 2022 in a Malaysian university hospital were screened to identify cases of IOLAC. A case is classified as a composite adverse outcome if at least one of these 11 adverse outcomes of delivery blood loss ≥ 1000 ml, uterine scar complications, cord prolapse or presentation, placenta abruption, maternal fever (≥ 38 0C), chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical artery cord artery blood pH < 7.1 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/l, and neonatal ICU admission was present. An unplanned cesarean delivery was not considered an adverse outcome as the practical management alternative for a clinically indicated IOLAC was a planned cesarean. Bivariate analysis of participants\' characteristics was performed to identify predictors of their association with composite adverse outcome. Characteristics with crude p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis model.
RESULTS: Electronic medical records of 19,064 women were screened. 819 IOLAC cases and 98 cases with composite adverse outcomes were identified. Maternal height, ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, indication of previous cesarean, indication for IOLAC, and method of IOLAC had p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis and were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. After adjustment, only maternal height and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon remained significant at p < 0.05. Post hoc adjusted analysis that included all unplanned cesarean as an added qualifier for composite adverse outcome showed higher body mass index, short stature (< 157 cm), not of Chinese ethnicity, no prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean indicated by labor dystocia, and less favorable Bishop score (< 6) were independent predictors of the expanded composite adverse outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Shorter women and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon were independently predictive of composite of adverse outcome.
Shorter stature and dinoprostone labor induction are independent predictors of a composite maternal-newborn adverse outcome excluding unplanned cesarean delivery.