OBJECTIVE: There were few reports in the literature regarding hidden blood loss following surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children. This study aimed to evaluate the volume of hidden blood loss and its risk factors among children undergoing hip reconstruction for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 42 patients (58 hips), who underwent Pemberton and femoral osteotomies between March 2020 and March 2023, was conducted. Serial complete blood count assays were conducted on the day of admission and four days post-surgery. Preoperative and postoperative hematocrit levels were documented to calculate hidden blood loss utilizing the Gross formula. Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, along with multivariable linear regression, were employed to ascertain associations between patient characteristics and hidden blood loss.
RESULTS: The mean hidden blood loss was recorded as 283.06 ± 271.05 mL, constituting 70.22% of the total blood loss. Multiple linear regression analysis identified weight and surgical duration as independent risk factors contributing to hidden blood loss.
CONCLUSIONS: A relevant amount of postoperative hidden blood loss occurs after Pemberton osteotomy and femoral osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Surgeons should be aware that patients who require blood transfusions and have longer surgical durations are at a higher risk of developing more hidden blood loss. Therefore, attention should be given to hidden blood loss to ensure patient safety during the perioperative period for those undergoing Pemberton and femoral osteotomies.
METHODS: IV.

BACKGROUND: Iliac crest autograft is frequently used to fill in bone defects after osteotomies. Nonetheless, surgery for bone autograft procurement is associated with morbidity and pain at the donor site. Alternatives to it have been explored, but there is no consensus to guide their application as a routine practice in several orthopedic procedures. Thus, this study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety between iliac crest autograft and allograft in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients with a symptomatic unilateral genu varum and an indication for high tibial osteotomy were randomly assigned to receive either autograft or allograft to fill the osteotomy site. Operative time, bone healing, and complication rates (delayed union, nonunion, superficial and deep infection, loss of correction, and hardware failure) were recorded after a one-year follow-up. Data were expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation and considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The time to radiologic union was similar between both groups (Allograft: 2.38 ± 0.97 months vs. Autograft: 2.45 ± 0.91 months; p = 0.79). Complication rates were also similar in both groups, with one infection in the allograft group and two in the autograft group, two delayed unions in the allograft group, and three in the autograft group. The operative time differed by 11 min between the groups, being lower in the allograft group (Allograft: 65.4 ± 15.1 min vs. Autograft: 76.3 ± 15.2 min; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Iliac crest allografts can be safely and effectively used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy as it promotes the same rates of bone union as those achieved by autologous grafts, with the benefits of a shorter operative time.
BACKGROUND: U1111-1280-0637 1 December 2022, retrospectively registered.

The 3 primary factors involved with preservation of the hip joint are femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), hip dysplasia, and femoral torsion abnormalities. Each of these factors affects the health of the acetabular labrum and femoroacetabular cartilage. The appropriate surgical treatments for each of these factors include arthroscopic or open femoroplasty or acetabuloplasty for FAI, periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for acetabular dysplasia, and de-rotational femoral osteotomy for femoral torsion abnormalities. When evaluating patients with prearthritic hip conditions, orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the various factors involved in hip joint preservation and, if surgery is indicated, surgeons should be sure to address all factors that need surgical treatment rather than focusing on the most obvious issue or injury (e.g., a labral tear). The purpose of this infographic is to illustrate the importance of the factors involved in hip joint preservation and the appropriate treatments for pathology in any of these factors.

UNASSIGNED: To rigorously derive easy to use formulae for the inclination angle for single cut rotation osteotomy that can be used for tibia deformity correction.
UNASSIGNED: Three theorems were proven using trigonometric identities and concepts of linear algebra. These were rigorously shown. The three concepts were how to convert deformities in an AP/Lateral plane to an oblique plane deformity with a true angular magnitude of deformity; how to project an angular quantity from one plane to another; and the calculation of the inclination angle for the oblique osteotomy plane. All figures in this article were created by the authors of this paper.
UNASSIGNED: From the formula derived, a statistical t-test was performed that showed no significant difference between the formula derived in this paper and the original Sangeorzan paper charts (p=0.8782).
UNASSIGNED: The formulae described in this article are a method to accurately calculate the inclination angle of the osteotomy for a single cut rotational osteotomy for tibial deformity correction.
UNASSIGNED: The article gives a deeper understanding of fundamental concepts behind deformity correction and provides an easy-to-use mathematical formula to calculate the osteotomy inclination for single cut rotational osteotomies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the implant stability and amount of marginal bone loss in immediate implant placement (IIP) in mandibular molars by using pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation vs conventional post-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation.
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on fourteen patients who had an immediate dental implant at the mandibular molar area by two different techniques. All patients were divided randomly into two equal groups: Group I (control) was treated with conventional post-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation, and group II (test) was treated by pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. All patients were followed up clinically at immediate post-surgery (T0), 7 days (T1), 3 weeks (T2), 90 days (T3), and 3 months after loading (T6) for healing and to evaluate the marginal bone loss radiographically at T0, T3 and T6. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed using the SPSS version (SPSS, IBM Inc., Chicago, IL), and p ≤ 0.05 was considered an indicator of statistical significance.
RESULTS: A total of 7 female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 32.07 ± 5.87 years. Radiographically, there is no significant statistical difference in comparing between two groups for the marginal bone loss. However, there was a highly significant statistical difference (p < 0.001) in each group between different interval periods (T0, T3, T6) with mean start 5.27 ± 0.53, and 5.19 ± 0.72 at (T0) reaching 7.60 ± 0.89 and 7.09 ± 0.96 at (T3) and slightly decrease of 7.52 ± 0.79 and 7.02 ± 0.79 in (T6) with radiographic evaluation, and it represented clinically in each group with mean 3.57 ± 0.313 and 4.0 ± 0.58 at (T0) increase to 6.55 ± 0.395 and 6.52 ± 0.45 at (T6) for both group respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in soft tissue healing with an average mean of 4.57 ± 0.24 and 3.57 ± 0.509 (p = 0.001) when comparing between both groups respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques seem useful for dental implant placement in badly decayed mandibular molars. However, pre-extracted interradicular implant bed preparation for IIP might offer advantages in terms of primary implant stability and bone preservation. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are alternative methods for the treatment of badly decayed mandibular molars by immediate dental implant except for minor complications that do not interfere with dental implant placement. How to cite this article: Alzaibak LMA, Abdel-Monem TM, Elgohary NM, et al. Immediate Implant Placement with Different Interradicular Osteotomies in the Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):303-312.

Over the years, with a better understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics, superior implant designs, advanced surgical techniques, and the availability of precision tools such as robotics and navigation, a more personalized approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged. In the presence of extra-articular deformities, performing personalized TKA can be more challenging and specific considerations are required, since one has to deal with an acquired pathological anatomy. Performing personalized TKA surgery in patients with extra-articular deformities, the surgeon can: (1) resurface the joint, omitting the extra-articular deformity; (2) partially compensate the extra-articular deformity with intra-articular correction (hybrid technique), or (3) correct the extra-articular deformity combined with a joint resurfacing TKA (single stage or two-stage procedure). Omitting the acquired lower limb malalignment by resurfacing the knee has the advantages of respecting the joint surface anatomy and preserving soft tissue laxities. On the other hand, it maintains pathological joint load and lower limb kinematics with potentially detrimental outcomes. The hybrid technique can be performed in most cases. It circumvents complications associated with osteotomies and brings lower limb axes closer to native alignment. On the other hand, it creates some intra-articular imbalances, which may require soft tissue releases and/or constrained implants. Correcting the extra-articular deformity (through an osteotomy) in conjunction with joint resurfacing TKA represents the only true kinematic alignment technique, as it aims to reproduce native knee laxity and overall lower limb axis.

UNASSIGNED: Two basic methods for genu valgum correction are osteotomy and internal fixation or external fixator assited correction. External fixators have the advantage of stabilizing fragments before osteotomy allowing better control of fragments and preventing secondary displacements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of fixator assisted correction for genu valgum and internal fixation, using the AO distal femur pediatric osteotomy plate.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six limbs in 26 patients (age 10-16 years) underwent osteotomy in the distal femur at CORA. Open lateral wedge osteotomy was done; the desired position obtained was temporarily stabilized by connecting the pins with the AO external fixator and stabilized with 90 degrees AO distal femur pediatric locking plate and gap grafted with hydroxyapatite bone granules.
UNASSIGNED: Translation of distal fragment was required in 17 osteotomies (53.12%). Osteotomies united within 12 weeks; no non-union was observed. The range of motion was full in all patients. The mean tibiofemoral angle was corrected by 12 degrees and the mean mechanical LDFA was corrected to 87 degrees. There was no secondary deformity, either in the rotational or sagittal plane.
UNASSIGNED: This method combines the modularity of external fixator and the advantages of internal fixation.

BACKGROUND: The preferred treatment for distal humeral intercondylar fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. While there is consensus about the posterior approach, several posterior approaches have been developed. It is debatable as to which approach is best.
OBJECTIVE: To compare triceps reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) and olecranon osteotomy approaches for internal fixation of distal humeral intercondylar fracture.
METHODS: In total, 40 cases of Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association of the Study of Internal Fixation type C, closed, and Gustilo type I intercondylar humeral fractures were included. Patients ranged in age from 18 years to 70 years. The patients were randomized into two groups: TRAP group and olecranon osteotomy group, with 20 cases in each. All were followed up at 6 wk, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Functional outcomes were measured in terms of flexion-extension arc, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.
RESULTS: The mean age was 43.2 years in the TRAP group and 37.5 years in the olecranon osteotomy group. The mean operative time and mean duration of hospital stay in the TRAP group were significantly higher than in the olecranon osteotomy group (119.5 vs 111.5 min and 9.85 vs 5.45 d, respectively). The mean arc of flexion-extension, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were comparable without any significant difference in the groups at the 12-month follow-up (107.0 vs 106.2, 18.3 vs 15.7, and 84.2 vs 86.2, respectively). Ulnar paresthesia and superficial infections were comparable in both groups (2 cases vs 3 cases and 3 cases vs 2 cases, respectively). Hardware prominence was significantly higher in the olecranon osteotomy group, mostly due to tension band wiring.
CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches were equivalent, but there is a need for further study including higher numbers of subjects and longer study duration to prove the benefits of one approach over the other.

OBJECTIVE: To expand and improve upon previously described nasal osteotomy models with the goals of decreasing cost and production time while ensuring model fidelity. To assess change in participant confidence in their understanding of and ability to perform nasal osteotomies following completion of the simulation course.
METHODS: Prospective study.
METHODS: Simulation training course for otolaryngology residents at West Virginia University.
METHODS: A combined methodology of 3D printing, silicone molding, and resin casting was used to design a nasal osteotomy model to address material issues such as print delamination. Multiple models were then used in a simulation lab on performing nasal osteotomies. Model utility and impact on participant confidence was assessed at baseline, postlecture, and postsimulation lab.
RESULTS: Using a combined manufacturing methodology, we achieved a production time reduction of 97.71% and a cost reduction of 82.02% for this polyurethane resin nasal osteotomy model relative to a previously described osteotomy model. Participants in the simulation course were noted to have a significant improvement in confidence in their understanding of and ability to perform nasal osteotomies from baseline and postlecture and also from postlecture and postsimulation lab (P < .05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: By incorporating multiple manufacturing modalities (molding and casting) in addition to 3D printing, this study achieved a large reduction in both production time and cost in fabrication of a nasal osteotomy simulator and addressed material limitations imposed by fused deposition modeling printers. This design methodology serves as an example on how these barriers may be addressed in unrelated simulation projects. Model fidelity was improved with addition of a silicone soft tissue midface. Improvement in participant confidence was noted following completion of the simulation lab.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty is a common surgical procedure used in nose esthetics and pathologies. Shaping the nasal bones is a crucial step in achieving successful rhinoplasty surgery. However, complications such as excessive bleeding, edema, mucosal damage, and periosteal damage may occur during osteotomy for nose shaping.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the damage to soft tissue and the effects on oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokines in the blood caused by osteotomy performed on rabbits, using different osteotomy methods. Methods: Thirty-two albino New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups. Group A was the sham group (n = 8), Group B the piezoelectric device group (n = 8), Group C the manual saw group (n = 8), and Group D the classical osteotomy group (n = 8). About 3 ml of blood was drawn to compare preoperative and postoperative interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and glutathione (GSH) levels. A 1 mm3 piece of soft tissue from the nasal bone of each animal in the study groups was sent for histopathological examination. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the incidence of postoperative necrosis, inflammation, and edema in the groups.
RESULTS: Histopathologically, edema was significantly higher in Group C and Group D compared to Group B. Inflammation was increased in all groups. The necrosis was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group C and Group D. Except for two parameters, no significant changes were found in the biochemical markers for all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The piezoelectric device was found to be a better option for reducing edema and inflammation, while manual saws and classical osteotomy may lead to more tissue damage.