{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Rapid Production Nasal Osteotomy Simulators With Multi-Modality Manufacturing: 3D Printing, Casting, and Molding.
{Author}: Tumlin P;Sunyecz I;Cui R;Armeni M;Freiser ME;
{Journal}: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 29
{Factor}: 5.591
{DOI}: 10.1002/ohn.877
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To expand and improve upon previously described nasal osteotomy models with the goals of decreasing cost and production time while ensuring model fidelity. To assess change in participant confidence in their understanding of and ability to perform nasal osteotomies following completion of the simulation course.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Prospective study.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Simulation training course for otolaryngology residents at West Virginia University.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A combined methodology of 3D printing, silicone molding, and resin casting was used to design a nasal osteotomy model to address material issues such as print delamination. Multiple models were then used in a simulation lab on performing nasal osteotomies. Model utility and impact on participant confidence was assessed at baseline, postlecture, and postsimulation lab.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Using a combined manufacturing methodology, we achieved a production time reduction of 97.71% and a cost reduction of 82.02% for this polyurethane resin nasal osteotomy model relative to a previously described osteotomy model. Participants in the simulation course were noted to have a significant improvement in confidence in their understanding of and ability to perform nasal osteotomies from baseline and postlecture and also from postlecture and postsimulation lab (P < .05 for all).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>By incorporating multiple manufacturing modalities (molding and casting) in addition to 3D printing, this study achieved a large reduction in both production time and cost in fabrication of a nasal osteotomy simulator and addressed material limitations imposed by fused deposition modeling printers. This design methodology serves as an example on how these barriers may be addressed in unrelated simulation projects. Model fidelity was improved with addition of a silicone soft tissue midface. Improvement in participant confidence was noted following completion of the simulation lab.