Open

打开
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)与开腹全胃切除术(OTG)对进展期胃癌(AGC)患者新辅助化疗(NACT)后的远期疗效。
    方法:术前接受NACT的AGC患者纳入LTG或OTG组。基于使用0.15卡尺宽度的倾向评分,在两组之间进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)(1:2)。比较两组患者PSM前后的3年总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。OS和DFS率通过Kaplan-Meier方法计算,生存率的任何差异均采用对数秩检验进行评估.使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险分析来评估LTG和OTG患者之间预后因素对生存和风险比(HR)的同时影响。
    结果:总共144名患者完成了随访,LTG组24例,OTG组120例。经过64.40个月的平均随访,PSM前(P=0.453,P=0.362)和PSM后(P=0.972,P=0.884)两组3年OS和DFS率比较,差异均无统计学意义。多因素Cox比例风险分析表明,ypN分期是OS恶化的独立危险因素(P=0.013)。
    结论:这项研究表明,在NACT后AGC患者中,由经验丰富的手术团队进行的LTG联合D2淋巴结清扫术与OTG相比,3年OS和DFS相当。
    背景:本研究未注册。
    BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
    METHODS: Patients with AGC who received NACT before surgery were enrolled in either the LTG or OTG group. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2) was performed between the two groups based on the propensity score using a 0.15 calliper width. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between these two groups before and after PSM. OS and DFS rates were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method, and any differences in survival were evaluated with a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of prognostic factors on survival and the hazard ratio (HR) between LTG and OTG patients.
    RESULTS: A total of 144 patients completed the follow-up, with 24 patients in the LTG group and 120 patients in the OTG group. After a mean follow-up of 64.40 months, there were no significant differences in the 3-year OS or DFS rates between the two groups before (P = 0.453 and P = 0.362, respectively) or after PSM (P = 0.972 and P = 0.884, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that ypN stage was an independent risk factor for worse OS (P = 0.013).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by an experienced surgical team resulted in comparable 3-year OS and DFS compared with OTG in patients with AGC after NACT.
    BACKGROUND: This study is not registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:成功的腹壁重建的最终措施是无痛,无并发症,和持久的疝气修复。开放式技术普遍失去了青睐,但是它们仍然可以为皮肤缺陷和皮肤过量的患者提供很多服务。开放式疝修补术的长期并发症发生率未知。电子病历现在提供了轻松跟踪已转换医疗机构的患者的能力。使用这个工具,我们追踪了一组早期"成功率"较高的腹壁重建术患者.
    方法:我们在2010年至2015年期间对101例患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者由一名外科医生(GAD)进行了开放性腹侧疝修补术,使用狭窄固定的直肌无涂层聚丙烯网片。这些患者最初是在2016年的出版物中报道的。任何评估腹部区域的医疗提供者对患者的术后随访进行了研究,直到2023年8月。患者人口统计学,手术报告,并对术后病程进行了重新回顾。
    结果:共有101例患者接受了腹侧疝修补术。平均随访时间为7.68年(范围1.8-13.0年)。在整个研究时间段内,没有复发性疝气,也没有肠皮肤瘘的实例。15例患者(15%)在疝修补术后进行了与原始手术无关的腹部手术,5例患者(5%)报告了慢性术后疼痛。13例患者在随访期间死亡,都与腹壁手术无关。
    结论:开放固定的狭窄直肌后网状疝修补术在长期无瘘管的情况下表现良好,挤压,和疝气复发。
    BACKGROUND: The ultimate measure of successful abdominal wall reconstruction is a pain-free, complication-free, and durable hernia repair. Open techniques have generally lost favor, but they still have much to offer for patients with skin deficits and excess. The long-term complication rates for open hernia repairs is unknown. Electronic medical records now provide the ability to easily follow patients who have switched medical institutions. Using this tool, we followed a cohort of abdominal wall reconstruction patients who had an early high \"success\" rate.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 101 patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair with a narrow well-fixed retrorectus uncoated polypropylene mesh by a single surgeon (GAD) between the years of 2010 and 2015. These patients were initially reported in a 2016 publication. Patients\' post-operative follow-up by any medical provider assessing the abdominal region were studied up until August 2023. Patient demographics, operative reports, and postoperative course were re-reviewed.
    RESULTS: A total of 101 patients underwent ventral hernia repair. Mean follow-up time was 7.68 years (range 1.8 - 13.0 years). There were no recurrent hernias across the studied time period and no instances of enterocutaneous fistulas. 15 patients (15%) had abdominal surgery after hernia repair unrelated to their original surgery and 5 patients (5%) reported chronic post-operative pain. 13 patients died in the follow-up period, all unrelated to the abdominal wall surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Open well-fixed narrow retrorectus mesh hernia repairs perform well in the long-term without fistulas, extrusions, and hernia recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童和青少年患者的肩关节不稳可以通过关节镜或开放手术进行手术治疗,但缺乏证据支持这些治疗方式随着时间的推移而发生。假设关节镜肩关节稳定手术的总体速率将随着时间的推移而增加。鉴于开放式稳定技术的进步,我们还假设开放程序的比率可能会增加。
    在2009年至2019年期间,查询了19岁或19岁以下因肩关节不稳和小儿骨科手术而接受关节镜或开放手术的患者的儿科健康信息系统数据库。来自52家儿科医院中37家的儿科健康信息系统数据被纳入分析。对关节镜和开放手术的年发病率和总发病率进行了估计,以及95%的置信区间。还检查了继发性(同侧翻修)或原发性对侧关节镜和开放式手术的年发生率。
    4747例患者接受了初级关节镜手术,384例患者接受了初级开放手术。2009年,每10,000名骨科手术患者中有8.2例主要的开放性肩部稳定手术,2019年下降了19%,为每10,000名骨科手术患者6.7例。关节镜和开放式二次稳定手术均有所增加。2009年,每10,000名骨科手术患者中有0.97例二次关节镜手术。2019年,这一数字增加了672%,达到每10,000名骨科手术患者中的7.5名。2009年没有记录二级开放程序;然而,到2019年,每10,000名骨科手术患者中,二级开放手术增加到2.6例.
    这项研究表明,在过去的十年中,美国的原发性关节镜小儿肩关节稳定手术有所增加。原发性开放性肩关节稳定手术的比率略有下降,关节镜和开放性继发性(同侧翻修或原发性对侧)肩关节稳定手术的比率均有所增加。这意味着这一人群的修订负担越来越大。
    UNASSIGNED: Shoulder instability in pediatric and adolescent patients can be treated operatively via arthroscopic or open procedures, but there a paucity of evidence to support the incidence of these treatment modalities over time. It is hypothesized that the overall rate of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures will increase over time. Given advances in open stabilization techniques, we also hypothesized that the rate of open procedures may be increasing.
    UNASSIGNED: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients 19 years or younger who underwent arthroscopic or open surgery for shoulder instability and pediatric orthopedic surgeries between 2009 and 2019. Data from 37 of the 52 pediatric hospitals with Pediatric Health Information System data was included in the analysis. Annual and overall incidence rates were estimated for arthroscopic and open procedures, along with 95% confidence intervals. The yearly incidence for secondary (homolateral revisions) or primary contralateral arthroscopic and open procedures was also examined.
    UNASSIGNED: 4747 patients underwent primary arthroscopic procedures and 384 patients had primary open procedures. There were 8.2 primary open shoulder stabilization procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2009, which decreased by 19% to 6.7 per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2019. There was an increase seen in both arthroscopic and open secondary stabilization procedures. In 2009, there were 0.97 secondary arthroscopic procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients. This increased by 672% to 7.5 per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients in 2019. No secondary open procedures were recorded in 2009; however, an increase to 2.6 secondary open procedures per 10,000 orthopedic surgical patients was seen by 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: This study shows a rise in primary arthroscopic pediatric shoulder stabilization surgeries across the U.S. over the last decade. There was a slight decrease in the rate of primary open shoulder stabilization surgeries and an increase in both arthroscopic and open secondary (homolateral revisions or primary contralateral) shoulder stabilization surgeries, implying an increasing revision burden in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经根型颈椎病是一种脊柱疾病,通常需要通过前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)或后路椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术进行手术减压。虽然内窥镜后路椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术越来越受欢迎,尽管随机长期结果与ACDF相当,但其财务影响仍未得到充分研究。在接受ACDF与内窥镜后路颈椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术的患者队列中,我们试图比较手术的总费用,同时确认相同的安全性和围手术期结局.
    方法:对2018年至2023年接受ACDF或内镜下颈椎椎间孔切开术的单侧神经根型颈椎病患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。主要结果包括初始手术发作的护理总费用(不包括费用或报销)。记录围手术期变量和神经功能恢复情况。多变量分析测试年龄,身体质量指数,种族,性别,保险类型,手术时间,和逗留时间的长短。
    结果:共进行了38例ACDF和17例内镜下椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术。除2例双级别内镜减压外,所有患者均接受了单级手术。除年龄较小(46.8±9.4vs57.6±10.3,P=0.002)和吸烟者较多(18.4%vs11.8%)外,基线特征和症状长度无差异。ACDF组P=0.043)。在多变量分析中,ACDF队列中手术护理事件的实际住院费用明显更高(平均±95%CI;$27,782±$2011vs$10,103±$720,P<0.001),由ACDF方法驱动(β=$17,723,P<0.001)。关于敏感性分析,与内窥镜下椎间孔切开术相比,ACDF从来都没有成本效益。对于收支平衡的成本,需要64%的内镜失败率.ACDF与手术时间明显延长相关(167.7±22.0vs142.7±27.4分钟,P<0.001)和住院时间(1.1±0.5vs0.1±0.2天,P<0.001)。关于90天的神经系统改善没有发现显着差异,重新接纳,再操作,或并发症。
    结论:与单级ACDF治疗单侧神经根型颈椎病的患者相比,内窥镜颈椎后路椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术可以达到类似的安全性,疼痛缓解,以相当低的成本恢复神经系统。这些发现可能有助于患者和外科医生重新审视,利用内窥镜技术进行颈椎后路椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术。
    结论:内窥镜颈后路椎间孔切开术/椎间盘切除术提供了相当的安全性,疼痛缓解,和神经学恢复到传统方法,但成本大大降低。
    方法:
    BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is a spine ailment frequently requiring surgical decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy/discectomy. While endoscopic posterior foraminotomy/discectomy is gaining popularity, its financial impact remains understudied despite equivalent randomized long-term outcomes to ACDF. In a cohort of patients undergoing ACDF vs endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy, we sought to compare the total cost of the surgical episode while confirming an equivalent safety profile and perioperative outcomes.
    METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy undergoing ACDF or endoscopic cervical foraminotomy between 2018 and 2023 was undertaken. Primary outcomes included the total cost of care for the initial surgical episode (not charges or reimbursement). Perioperative variables and neurological recovery were recorded. Multivariable analysis tested age, body mass index, race, gender, insurance type, operative time, and length of stay.
    RESULTS: A total of 38 ACDF and 17 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy operations were performed. All patients underwent single-level surgery except for 2 two-level endoscopic decompressions. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and symptom length except for younger age (46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3, P = 0.002) and more smokers (18.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.043) in the ACDF group. Actual hospital costs for the episode of surgical care were markedly higher in the ACDF cohort (mean ±95% CI; $27,782 ± $2011 vs $10,103 ± $720, P < 0.001) driven by the ACDF approach (β = $17,723, P < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, ACDF was never cost-efficient compared with endoscopic foraminotomy, and endoscopic failure rates of 64% were required for break-even cost. ACDF was associated with significantly longer operative time (167.7 ± 22.0 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 minutes, P < 0.001) and length of stay (1.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 days, P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding 90-day neurological improvement, readmission, reoperation, or complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients treated with a single-level ACDF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy can achieve a similar safety profile, pain relief, and neurological recovery at considerably less cost. These findings may help patients and surgeons revisit offering the posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy utilizing endoscopic techniques.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy offers comparable safety, pain relief, and neurological recovery to traditional methods but at a significantly lower cost.
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一名遭受农业翻滚创伤并由耻垢分枝杆菌引起的骨折相关组织感染的患者。由于病例很少见,耻垢分枝杆菌感染的治疗需要跨专业的方法以及手术和辅助抗菌治疗的结合。
    We present a patient who suffered an agricultural rollover trauma and developed a fracture-associated tissue infection caused by Mycobacterium smegmatis. Since cases are rare, treatment of infections with M. smegmatis requires an interprofessional approach and the combination of surgery and adjunctive antimicrobial treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了老年患者结直肠癌(CRC)的副作用对预后的影响。
    方法:在2003年至2007年在日本进行的一项多中心病例对照研究的亚分析中,对右侧结肠癌(RCC)和左侧结直肠癌(LCC)的短期和长期结果进行了比较。RCC定义为从盲肠到横结肠的那些。
    结果:在1680例接受根治性手术的患者中,812和868有RCC和LCC,分别。在女性中,RCC比LCC更频繁,有肾脏合并症,有腹部手术史.关于肿瘤的特点,RCC更大,更深入地入侵,与LCC相比,被诊断为粘液性或印戒细胞癌的频率更高。关于预后,与LCC患者相比,RCC患者的癌症特异性生存期(CS-S)和癌症特异性无复发生存期(CS-RFS)显著更长.此外,侧方被确定为CS-S和CS-RFS的独立预后因素。
    结论:RCC,占≥80岁患者病例的一半,显示出比LCC更好的长期结果。
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients on the prognosis.
    METHODS: In a sub-analysis of a multicenter case-control study of CRC patients who underwent surgery at ≥ 80 years old conducted in Japan between 2003 and 2007, both short- and long-term outcomes were compared between right-sided colon cancers (RCCs) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCCs). RCCs were defined as those located from the cecum to the transverse colon.
    RESULTS: Among the 1680 patients who underwent curative surgery, 812 and 868 had RCCs and LCCs, respectively. RCCs were more frequent than LCCs in those who were female, had renal comorbidities, and had a history of abdominal surgery. Regarding tumor characteristics, RCCs were larger, invaded more deeply, and were diagnosed as either mucinous or signet ring-cell carcinoma more frequently than LCCs. Regarding the prognosis, patients with RCCs had a significantly longer cancer-specific survival (CS-S) and cancer-specific relapse-free survival (CS-RFS) than those with LCCs. Furthermore, sidedness was determined to be an independent prognostic factor for CS-S and CS-RFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: RCCs, which accounted for half of the cases in patients ≥ 80 years old, showed better long-term outcomes than LCCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜检查在胆囊癌(GBC)分期中可能起作用,根治,和胆囊癌的缓解。然而,一些研究提倡使用腹腔镜方法,并得出结论这种方法的安全性.本研究旨在确定非转移性GBC患者开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术之间的安全性和可行性。
    在MEDLINE中进行了系统的数据库搜索,Embase,和谷歌学者的相关文章。因此,这些研究的清单,临床试验,截至2021年5月以英文出版,已获得,纳入14项研究,使用RevMan软件5.3(北欧Cochrane中心)进行统计分析。
    14项研究中有13项报告了5年生存率(1388例患者),并比较了腹腔镜和开放方法。研究之间没有显著的异质性(卡方,10.66;df,12;I2,0%)。开放组的总生存率显着提高(389/850vs194/538或1.45,95%CI(1.12-1.88),P值,0.005).复发率无显著差异,手术时间,失血,淋巴结产量,开放组和腹腔镜组之间的术后并发症。
    本研究表明,与腹腔镜手术相比,开腹手术的总生存率显著提高。复发率没有差异,手术时间,失血,淋巴结产量,开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术组的术后并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopy in gallbladder cancer (GBC) has a possible role in staging, radical cure, and palliation in gallbladder cancer. However, a few studies have advocated the use of laparoscopic approach and concluded the safety of this approach. This present study was undertaken to determine the safety and feasibility between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with the non-metastatic GBC.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant articles. As a result, a list of such studies, clinical trials, published in English up to May 2021, was obtained,14 studies were included and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre).
    UNASSIGNED: The 5-year survival rate was reported in 13 out of 14 studies (1388 patients), and all compared laparoscopic and open approach. There was no significant heterogeneity in between the studies (chi-square, 10.66; df, 12; I2, 0%). There was significant higher overall survival in open group (389/850 vs 194/538 or 1.45, 95% CI (1.12-1.88), P value, 0.005). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complication in between open and laparoscopic groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Our present study demonstrates that overall survival is significantly increased with open approach when compared with laparoscopic approach. There is no difference in recurrence rate, operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, and postoperative complications between the open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在分析健脾生血片治疗肾性贫血的临床疗效。
    方法:纳入2020年12月至2022年12月的200例肾性贫血患者,随机分为两组。对照组患者给予多糖铁复合物治疗,实验组给予健脾生血片。连续治疗8周后,比较了两组患者贫血的治疗结果.
    结果:治疗后,红细胞(RBC)计数,血细胞比容(HCT),网织红细胞百分比(RET),铁蛋白(SF),血清铁(SI),转铁蛋白饱和度(TSAT),血清白蛋白(ALB)均升高(P<0.01),实验组临床症状评分和总铁结合力下降(P<0.01)。此外,RBC的改进,HCT,RET,SF,SI,TAST,ALB,和临床症状(疲劳,厌食症,暗沉的皮肤肤色,手脚麻木)明显大于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组治疗肾性贫血的总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。
    结论:健脾生血片治疗肾性贫血疗效确切,导致肾性贫血患者的实验室检查结果和临床症状明显改善。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of the Jianpi Shengxue tablet for treating renal anemia.
    METHODS: A total of 200 patients with renal anemia from December 2020 to December 2022 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the control group were treated with polysaccharide-iron complex, and those in the experimental group were administered Jianpi Shengxue tablet. After 8 weeks of continuous treatment, the therapeutic outcomes regarding anemia were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: After treatment, the red blood cell (RBC) count, hematocrit (HCT), reticulocyte percentage (RET), ferritin (SF), serum iron (SI), transferrin saturation (TSAT), and serum albumin (ALB) all increased (P<0.01), and the clinical symptom score and total iron binding capacity decreased (P<0.01) in the experimental group. Moreover, the improvements in RBC, HCT, RET, SF, SI, TAST, ALB, and clinical symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, dull skin complexion, numbness of hands and feet) in the experimental group were significantly greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate for treating renal anemia was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Jianpi Shengxue tablet demonstrates efficacy in treating renal anemia, leading to significant improvements in the laboratory examination results and clinical symptoms of patients with renal anemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)治疗大肝细胞癌(HCC)的适应症存在争议。在这项研究中,我们比较了LLR和开放式肝切除术(OLR)治疗大型HCC的短期和长期结局.
    我们在PubMed中搜索了有关LLR与OLR的大型HCC的合格文章,科克伦图书馆,和EMBASE,并进行了荟萃分析。
    纳入了8篇出版物,涉及1,338例患者。其中,495例接受LLR,843例接受OLR。LLR组手术时间较长(MD:22.23,95%CI:4.14~40.33,p=0.02)。但术后住院时间明显缩短(MD:-4.88,CI:-5.55至-4.23,p<0.00001),术后总并发症和主要并发症的发生率明显较低(OR:0.49,95%CI:0.37-0.66,p<0.00001;OR:0.54,95%CI:0.36-0.82,p=0.003)。腹腔镜组患者术中出血量差异无统计学意义,术中输血率,切除边缘大小,R0切除率,3年总生存期(OS)和3年无病生存期(DFS)。
    大型HCC的LLR是安全可行的。这种手术策略不会影响患者的长期预后。
    UNASSIGNED: The indication of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for large HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched eligible articles about LLR versus OLR for large HCC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE and performed a meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight publications involving 1,338 patients were included. Among them, 495 underwent LLR and 843 underwent OLR. The operation time was longer in the LLR group (MD: 22.23, 95% CI: 4.14-40.33, p = 0.02). but the postoperative hospital stay time was significantly shorter (MD : -4.88, CI: -5.55 to -4.23, p < 0.00001), and the incidence of total postoperative complications and major complications were significantly fewer (OR: 0.49, 95% CI:0.37-0.66, p < 0.00001; OR: 0.54, 95% CI:0.36 - 0.82, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients in the laparoscopic group had no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, resection margin size, R0 resection rate, three-year overall survival (OS) and three-year disease-free survival (DFS).
    UNASSIGNED: LLR for large HCC is safe and feasible. This surgical strategy will not affect the long-term outcomes of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝修补术是最常用的外科手术之一,通常由外科实习生和初级住院医师进行。虽然传统上是公开表演的,微创(MIS)腹股沟疝修补术已成为一种越来越受欢迎的方法。这项研究的目的是确定过去二十年来普通外科住院医师培训中MIS和开放式腹股沟和股疝修补术的趋势。
    方法:回顾了1999年至2022年普外科居民的研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)国家病例日志数据。我们收集了开放式和MIS腹股沟和股疝修补术的均值和标准偏差。线性回归和方差分析用于确定居民记录的开放和MIS疝修补的平均年数量的趋势。病例在住院医师级别之间进行了区分:外科医生主任(SC)和外科医生初级(SJ)。
    结果:从1999年7月到2022年6月,普外科居民记录的平均每年MIS腹股沟和股疝修补术显着增加,从7.6到47.9例(p<0.001),普外科居民记录的平均每年开放腹股沟和股疝修补术显着下降,从51.9到39.7例(p<0.001)。SJ居民结果与这一总体趋势一致。对于SC居民,MIS和开放性疝修补术的体积均显著增加(p<0.001).
    结论:ACGME病例日志数据表明,普外科居民记录的腹股沟和股疝修补术总体数量减少的趋势。主要居民的开放式维修比例更大。这一趋势值得关注和进一步研究,因为它可能代表着技能或知识差距,对手术培训产生重大影响。
    BACKGROUND: Groin hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures and is often performed by surgical interns and junior residents. While traditionally performed open, minimally invasive (MIS) groin hernia repair has become an increasingly popular approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the trends in MIS and open inguinal and femoral hernia repair in general surgery residency training over the past two decades.
    METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) national case log data of general surgery residents from 1999 through 2022 were reviewed. We collected means and standard deviations of open and MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs. Linear regression and ANOVA were used to identify trends in the average annual number of open and MIS hernia repairs logged by residents. Cases were distinguished between level of resident trainees: surgeon-chief (SC) and surgeon-junior (SJ).
    RESULTS: From July 1999 to June 2022, the average annual MIS inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly increased, from 7.6 to 47.9 cases (p < 0.001), and the average annual open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs logged by general surgery residents significantly decreased, from 51.9 to 39.7 cases (p < 0.001). SJ resident results were consistent with this overall trend. For SC residents, the volume of both MIS and open hernia repairs significantly increased (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACGME case log data indicates a trend of general surgery residents logging overall fewer numbers of open inguinal and femoral hernia repairs, and a larger proportion of open repairs by chief residents. This trend warrants attention and further study as it may represent a skill or knowledge gap with significant impact of surgical training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号