目标:如美国职业治疗协会(AOTA;2023)关于职业治疗博士顶点的目的和价值的声明中所确定的,缺乏关于博士capstone的目的和价值的证据。作为职业治疗博士学位课程的基本要素,每个节目的顶点都是独一无二的,支持该计划的奖学金议程,并满足学生和该专业所服务社区的需求。
目的:制定博士顶石研究议程,以优先考虑和指导研究,以补充当前与顶石功效或有效性相关的证据的匮乏。
方法:使用范围审查指南的系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目进行范围审查。使用CINAHL搜索了1999年至2023年6月之间发表的同行评审文章,PsycINFO,PubMed,和Embase数据库。
结果:制定并组织了博士顶石研究议程,分为五类,以推动研究活动,包括与规划相关的教学和体验式学习,实施,和评估顶点过程:(1)教学和学习;(2)学习者特征和能力;(3)塑造专业身份;(4)教师/导师发展和资源;(5)促进多样性,股本,和包容。
结论:根据AOTA(2018)的职业治疗教育研究议程制定了博士顶石研究议程。它确定了一系列需要研究的领域,以告知学生博士顶点的独特价值和目的,网站,programs,和职业。简单的语言摘要:职业治疗博士的顶峰是每个程序独特的,支持该计划的奖学金议程,并支持学生和该专业服务的社区的需求。美国职业治疗协会关于“职业治疗博士顶峰:目的和价值”的官方文件指出,缺乏关于如何确定博士顶峰的独特目的和价值的证据。此范围审查探讨了博士顶点研究议程的发展。提供了研究议程,以指导和优先研究,以阐明最佳实践以及博士在职业治疗教育和职业中的独特目的和价值。
OBJECTIVE: As identified in the American Occupational Therapy Association\'s (AOTA\'s; 2023) statement about the purpose and value of the occupational therapy doctoral capstone, there is a lack of evidence about the purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. As an essential element of occupational therapy doctoral degree curricula, the capstone is unique to each program, supports the program\'s scholarship agenda, and serves the needs of students and the communities served by the profession.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a doctoral capstone research agenda in an attempt to prioritize and guide research that can supplement the current paucity of evidence related to capstone efficacy or effectiveness.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were used to conduct a scoping review. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1999 and June 2023 were searched using the CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase databases.
RESULTS: The doctoral capstone research agenda was developed and organized into five categories to drive research activities inclusive of the didactic and experiential learning associated with the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the capstone process: (1) teaching and learning; (2) learner characteristics and competencies; (3) shaping professional identity; (4) faculty/mentor development and resources; and (5) promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
CONCLUSIONS: A doctoral capstone research agenda was developed in accordance with AOTA\'s (2018) Occupational Therapy Education Research Agenda. It identifies an array of areas in which research is needed to inform the distinct value and purpose of the doctoral capstone to students, sites, programs, and the profession. Plain-Language Summary: The occupational therapy doctoral capstone is unique to each program, supports the program\'s scholarship agenda, and supports the needs of students and the communities served by the profession. The American Occupational Therapy Association\'s official document on the \"Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone: Purpose and Value\" states that there is a lack of evidence about how to identify the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone. This scoping review explored the development of a doctoral capstone research agenda. A research agenda is provided to guide and prioritize research to articulate best practices and the distinct purpose and value of the doctoral capstone in occupational therapy education and for the profession.