Montreal Cognitive Assessment

蒙特利尔认知评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在疾病修饰疗法的时代,授权临床神经心理学家的工具包及时识别轻度认知障碍(MCI)是至关重要的。
    在这里,我们研究了蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的临床特性,用于早期诊断由于阿尔茨海默病(MCI-AD)引起的MCI。
    对48例MCI-AD患者和47例健康对照者的数据进行回顾性分析。根据常规Nasreddine的1分校正和来自三项规范性研究的人口统计学调整对原始MoCA评分进行校正。确定最佳截止值,同时对先前建立的截止值进行诊断重新评估。
    Nasreddine的原始截止值26和标准截止值(人口统计学调整分数分布的第5百分位数的非参数外部公差极限)在灵敏度(Se)和特异性(Sp)方面过于不平衡。Nasreddine调整的最佳截止值显示出足够的临床特性(≤23.50,Se=0.75,Sp=0.70)。然而,根据Larner的指标,Santangelo调整的最佳截止值(≤22.85,Se=0.65,Sp=0.87)被证明对筛查和诊断目的最有效。后概率分析的结果表明,使用Santangelo的校正结合22.85的截止值进行阳性测试的个体在测试后接受MCI-AD诊断的概率为84%(LR=5.06)。
    我们发现了一种在以诊断为导向的临床实践中绕过规范截止值适用性的常见(错误)实践。在这项研究中,我们确定了将MoCA分配到二级护理机构以支持MCI-AD诊断的最佳截止值.讨论了方法论和心理测量学问题。
    UNASSIGNED: In the era of disease-modifying therapies, empowering the clinical neuropsychologist\'s toolkit for timely identification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial.
    UNASSIGNED: Here we examine the clinimetric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the early diagnosis of MCI due to Alzheimer\'s disease (MCI-AD).
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 48 patients with MCI-AD and 47 healthy controls were retrospectively analyzed. Raw MoCA scores were corrected according to the conventional Nasreddine\'s 1-point correction and demographic adjustments derived from three normative studies. Optimal cutoffs were determined while previously established cutoffs were diagnostically reevaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The original Nasreddine\'s cutoff of 26 and normative cutoffs (non-parametric outer tolerance limit on the 5th percentile of demographically-adjusted score distributions) were overly imbalanced in terms of Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp). The optimal cutoff for Nasreddine\'s adjustment showed adequate clinimetric properties (≤23.50, Se = 0.75, Sp = 0.70). However, the optimal cutoff for Santangelo\'s adjustment (≤22.85, Se = 0.65, Sp = 0.87) proved to be the most effective for both screening and diagnostic purposes according to Larner\'s metrics. The results of post-probability analyses revealed that an individual testing positive using Santangelo\'s adjustment combined with a cutoff of 22.85 would have 84% post-test probability of receiving a diagnosis of MCI-AD (LR+ = 5.06).
    UNASSIGNED: We found a common (mal)practice of bypassing the applicability of normative cutoffs in diagnosis-oriented clinical practice. In this study, we identified optimal cutoffs for MoCA to be allocated in secondary care settings for supporting MCI-AD diagnosis. Methodological and psychometric issues are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是检测认知障碍的有价值的工具,在许多国家广泛使用。然而,目前仍缺乏大样本的规范性数据,其检测认知障碍的临界值存在相当大的争议.
    本研究采用MoCA量表进行评估,特别使用普通话8.1版本。这项研究共招募了3097名20岁以上的健康成年人。我们进行了多元线性回归分析,结合年龄,性别,和教育水平作为预测变量,检查它们与MoCA总分和子域分数的关联。随后,我们建立了按年龄和教育水平分层的规范价值观。最后,我们纳入了242例血管性认知障碍(VCI)患者和137例认知正常的对照,并通过ROC曲线确定VCI的最佳截断值。
    这项研究的参与者表现出平衡的性别分布,平均年龄为54.46岁(SD=14.38),平均受教育时间为9.49岁(SD=4.61)。研究人群的平均MoCA评分为23.25分(SD=4.82)。多元线性回归分析表明,MoCA总分受年龄和文化程度的影响,合计占总方差的46.8%。较高的年龄和较低的教育水平与较低的MoCA总分相关。22分是诊断血管性认知障碍(VCI)的最佳临界值。
    这项研究提供了针对中国成年人的规范MoCA值。此外,这项研究表明,26分可能并不代表VCI的最佳临界值.并且对于检测VCI,22的分数可以是更好的截止值。
    UNASSIGNED: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a valuable tool for detecting cognitive impairment, widely used in many countries. However, there is still a lack of large sample normative data and whose cut-off values for detecting cognitive impairment is considerable controversy.
    UNASSIGNED: The assessment conducted in this study utilizes the MoCA scale, specifically employing the Mandarin-8.1 version. This study recruited a total of 3,097 healthy adults aged over 20 years. We performed multiple linear regression analysis, incorporating age, gender, and education level as predictor variables, to examine their associations with the MoCA total score and subdomain scores. Subsequently, we established normative values stratified by age and education level. Finally, we included 242 patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and 137 controls with normal cognition, and determined the optimal cut-off value of VCI through ROC curves.
    UNASSIGNED: The participants in this study exhibit a balanced gender distribution, with an average age of 54.46 years (SD = 14.38) and an average education period of 9.49 years (SD = 4.61). The study population demonstrates an average MoCA score of 23.25 points (SD = 4.82). The multiple linear regression analysis indicates that MoCA total score is influenced by age and education level, collectively accounting for 46.8% of the total variance. Higher age and lower education level are correlated with lower MoCA total scores. A score of 22 is the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI).
    UNASSIGNED: This study offered normative MoCA values specific to the Chinese adults. Furthermore, this study indicated that a score of 26 may not represent the most optimal cut-off value for VCI. And for detecting VCI, a score of 22 may be a better cut-off value.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是运动障碍协会推荐的认知测试,包括帕金森氏病(PD)和路易体痴呆。很少有研究比较这些疾病的认知筛查工具,在临床上重叠。
    比较该人群的MoCA和快速轻度认知障碍(Qmci)屏幕。
    参加与大学医院相关的记忆和运动障碍诊所的患者进行了MoCA和Qmci筛查,并将诊断准确性与受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积进行了比较。使用统一PD评定量表(UPDRS)评估运动障碍的持续时间和严重程度。
    总共,有133项评估,中位年龄74±5。教育中位数为11±4年,男性占65%。UPDRS总分中位数为37±26。Qmci筛选中位数为51±27,MoCA中位数为19±10。有主观症状但认知正常者的测试成绩有统计学上的显著差异,轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆(p<0.001)。与MoCA相比,Qmci筛查将正常认知与MCI区分开的准确性明显更高(AUC0.90对0.72,p=0.01)。两种仪器在识别认知障碍和将MCI与痴呆分开方面具有相似的准确性。Qmci筛查和MoCA的中位给药时间分别为5.19和9.24分钟(p<0.001),分别。
    MoCA和Qmci屏幕在出现认知症状的运动障碍人群中都具有良好的准确性。对于有早期症状的患者,Qmci筛查明显更准确,给药时间更短。
    UNASSIGNED: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is recommended by the Movement Disorder Society for cognitive testing in movement disorders including Parkinson\'s disease (PD) and lewy body dementia. Few studies have compared cognitive screening instruments in these diseases, which overlap clinically.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the MoCA and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen in this population.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients attending memory and movement disorder clinics associated with a university hospital had the MoCA and Qmci screen performed and diagnostic accuracy compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Duration and severity of movement disorders was assessed using the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS).
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 133 assessments were available, median age 74±5. Median education was 11±4 years and 65% were male. Median total UPDRS score was 37±26. Median Qmci screen was 51±27, median MoCA was 19±10. There were statistically significant differences in test scores between those with subjective symptoms but normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (p < 0.001). The Qmci screen had significantly greater accuracy differentiating normal cognition from MCI versus the MoCA (AUC 0.90 versus 0.72, p = 0.01). Both instruments had similar accuracy in identifying cognitive impairment and separating MCI from dementia. The median administration time for the Qmci screen and MoCA were 5.19 and 9.24 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the MoCA and Qmci screen have good to excellent accuracy in a population with movement disorders experiencing cognitive symptoms. The Qmci screen was significantly more accurate for those with early symptoms and had a shorter administration time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的十年里,研究表明,原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)可能与认知障碍和痴呆有关,因为两种病理都是与年龄有关的神经退行性过程。目前尚不清楚POAG的神经变性在多大程度上延伸到视觉以外的其他神经功能,比如认知。这项后续研究研究了非洲血统人群中POAG与认知能力下降之间的潜在关联。方法:对先前参加原发性开角型非裔美国人青光眼遗传学(POAAGG)研究的POAG病例和对照组进行电话蒙特利尔认知评估(T-MoCA)。通过图表评估病例的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度和痴呆的存在。POAG病例和对照之间的比较使用两个样本t检验对T-MoCA总分和五个小节得分进行。并使用卡方测试痴呆症的发病率。将当前得分与7年前相同队列的得分进行比较。结果:对13例患者和20例对照组进行T-MoCA治疗。病例的平均±标准差(SD)T-MoCA总分为15.5±4.0,对照组为16.7±3.5(p=0.36)。然而,延迟回忆子评分存在边界显着差异(病例与病例相比为2.3±1.63.4±1.5对于对照,p=0.052)和其子域的显著差异,内存索引分数(MIS,9.1±4.3对于案例与12.1±3.0对于控件,p=0.02)。其余小节的病例和对照之间没有显着差异。在7年的随访中,POAG病例中痴呆的发生率较高(病例为7.1%vs.控件为0%,p=0.058)。超过7年,与对照组相比,病例的认知表现没有显著恶化,并且在RNFL减薄和认知障碍之间没有发现关联。结论:在这项对非洲血统个体的小样本随访研究中,与对照组相比,POAG病例表现出更差的短期记忆和更高的痴呆发病率。未来需要更大的研究来进一步研究POAG中神经变性的存在和影响。
    Background: Over the last decade, studies have suggested that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) may be associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, as both pathologies are age-related neurodegenerative processes. It remains unclear to what extent neurodegeneration in POAG extends to other neurological functions beyond vision, such as cognition. This follow-up study examined the potential association between POAG and cognitive decline in an African ancestry population. Methods: The Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) was administered to POAG cases and controls previously enrolled in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. Cases were assessed for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and for the presence of dementia via chart review. Comparisons between POAG cases and controls were performed using two-sample t-tests for the T-MoCA total score and five subsection scores, and using chi-squared tests for incidence of dementia. Current scores were compared to scores from this same cohort from 7 years prior. Results: The T-MoCA was administered to 13 cases and 20 controls. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) T-MoCA total score was 15.5 ± 4.0 in cases and 16.7 ± 3.5 in controls (p = 0.36). However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between cases and controls for the remaining subsections. During 7 years of follow-up, a higher incidence of dementia was noted in POAG cases (7.1% for cases vs. 0% for controls, p = 0.058). Over 7 years, there was no significant deterioration in the cognitive performance of cases versus controls, and no association was seen between RNFL thinning and cognitive impairment. Conclusions: In this small-sample follow-up study of African ancestry individuals, POAG cases demonstrated worse short-term memory and higher incidence of dementia compared to controls. Future larger studies are needed to further investigate the presence and impact of neurodegeneration in POAG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:以前的不同研究表明,嗅觉功能可以预测几种类型的认知障碍,特别是与神经退行性疾病有关。然而,关于气味阈值(OT)的作用只有很少的数据,气味鉴别(OD),和气味识别(OI)作为认知障碍的预测因子。这项研究的目的是评估健康受试者的嗅觉功能的每个因素与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试的每个特定认知域之间的潜在相关性。
    方法:Sniffin\'Sticks和MoCA测试用于确定嗅觉功能和认知能力,分别。
    结果:在男性中,在OT与语言指数得分以及OI与语言和高管指数得分中发现了显着的相关性,而在女性中,OD和OI与视觉空间指数得分相关。
    结论:我们的数据表明嗅觉功能(OT,OD,和OI)可以被认为是与性别和年龄相关的认知障碍的预测因子。
    BACKGROUND: Different previous studies indicated olfactory function as a predictor of several types of cognitive impairment, in particular related to neurodegenerative disease. However, scanty data are available on the role of odor threshold (OT), odor discrimination (OD), and odor identification (OI) as a predictor of cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential correlations between each factor of the olfactory function versus each specific cognitive domain of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test on healthy subjects in relation to gender and age.
    METHODS: Sniffin\' Sticks and MoCA tests were used to determine olfactory function and cognitive abilities, respectively.
    RESULTS: In men, significant correlations were found in OT versus language index score and OI versus language and executive index score, while in women, OD and OI were correlated to visuospatial index score.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that olfactory function (OT, OD, and OI) may be considered a predictor for cognitive impairment in relation to gender and age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较短便携式精神状态问卷(SPMSQ)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)在中风患者中的重测可靠性和最小可检测变化(MDC)。
    方法:从1个医疗中心招募63例患者。SPMSQ和MoCA给药两次,相隔两周。
    结果:两项测量均显示出较高的组内相关系数(SPMSQ:0.87;MoCA:0.89)和可接受的MDC%s(SPMSQ:14.8%;MoCA:19.6%)。SPMSQ中每对评估的绝对差异和平均值之间存在小的相关性(r=0.30),这接近异方差的标准。在MoCA中观察到较小的实践效果(Cohen'sd=0.30)。
    结论:SPMSQ显示出更小的随机测量误差,并且没有实践效果。当比较SPMSQ和MoCA的心理测量特性作为评估卒中患者认知功能的结果指标时,SPMSQ似乎是比MoCA更合适的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the test-retest reliabilities and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire (SPMSQ) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with stroke.
    METHODS: 63 patients were recruited from 1 medical center. The SPMSQ and MoCA were administered twice, 2 weeks apart.
    RESULTS: Both measures showed high intraclass correlation coefficients (SPMSQ: 0.87; MoCA: 0.89) and acceptable MDC%s (SPMSQ: 14.8%; MoCA: 19.6%). A small correlation (r = 0.30) was found between the absolute difference and average in each pair of assessments in the SPMSQ, which was close to the criterion of heteroscedasticity. A small practice effect was observed in the MoCA (Cohen\'s d = 0.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: The SPMSQ demonstrated smaller random measurement error and an absence of practice effect. When comparing the psychometric properties of the SPMSQ and MoCA as outcome measures for assessing cognitive function in patients with stroke, the SPMSQ appears to be a more suitable choice than the MoCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年人的认知障碍可能导致对靶向与认知相关的受体的麻醉剂的潜在敏感性增加。本研究旨在探讨认知状态对老年患者术中丙泊酚用量的影响。
    60名计划进行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的老年患者被分配到认知正常[CogN,蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分≥26]或认知障碍(CogI,MoCA<26)组。丙泊酚通过靶控输注给药,以在手术过程中维持脑电双频指数(BIS)在55-65之间。在三个时间点记录丙泊酚的消耗:T1(消除睫毛反射),T2(BIS=50),T3(拔管)。还记录了睫毛反射消除时的BIS值。术后MoCA,视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分,评估瑞芬太尼/舒芬太尼的消耗量.
    诱导前的BIS值在CogN和CogI组之间相似。然而,在睫毛反射废除时,CogI的BIS明显高于CogN(平均值±SD:65.3±7.2vs.61.1±6.8,p=0.031)。CogI与CogI相比,丙泊酚达到BIS50的需求较低CogN(1.24±0.19mg/kgvs.1.46±0.12mg/kg,p=0.003)。术后MoCA,VAS评分,两组患者的瑞芬太尼/舒芬太尼用量无显著差异.
    与认知完整的老年人相比,认知障碍患者在睫毛反射消除时表现出更高的BIS,并且需要更低的异丙酚剂量才能达到相同的BIS水平,提示异丙酚敏感性增加。认知状态可能会影响老年人的麻醉药物需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Cognitive impairment in the elderly may lead to potential increased sensitivity to anesthetic agents targeting receptors associated with cognition. This study aimed to explore the effect of cognitive status on propofol consumption during surgery in elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were allocated to either a cognitively normal [CogN, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥26] or cognitively impaired (CogI, MoCA <26) group. Propofol was administered via target-controlled infusion to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) between 55-65 during surgery. Propofol consumption was recorded at three time points: T1 (abolished eyelash reflex), T2 (BIS = 50), T3 (extubation). BIS values at eyelash reflex abolition were also recorded. Postoperative MoCA, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: BIS values before induction were similar between CogN and CogI groups. However, at eyelash reflex abolition, BIS was significantly higher in CogI than CogN (mean ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.2 vs. 61.1 ± 6.8, p = 0.031). Propofol requirement to reach BIS 50 was lower in CogI vs. CogN (1.24 ± 0.19 mg/kg vs. 1.46 ± 0.12 mg/kg, p = 0.003). Postoperative MoCA, VAS scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption did not differ significantly between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to cognitively intact elderly, those with cognitive impairment exhibited higher BIS at eyelash reflex abolition and required lower propofol doses to achieve the same BIS level, suggesting increased propofol sensitivity. Cognitive status may impact anesthetic medication requirements in the elderly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍最近介绍的阿尔茨海默病的疾病改善治疗方法已经重新振兴了早期痴呆检测的原因。认知“纸与铅笔”测试代表了临床评估的基石,因为它们很便宜,易于执行,并且不需要脑成像或生物测试。认知测试的持续时间差异很大,复杂性,社会语言偏见,探索认知领域,以及它们检测认知障碍(CI)的特异性和敏感性。因此,在生态学上有效的头对头比较对于基于证据的痴呆筛查似乎至关重要.方法我们比较了五个测试:MoCA,ADAS,ACE-III,Eurotest,并对大量老年人样本进行光测(N=456,77.9±8年,71%的女性)。通过将每个测试的结果与其余测试中的大多数结果进行对比,以一种新颖的方式估计了它们的特异性和敏感性(比较特异性和敏感性计算-CSSC)。这消除了对先验金标准的需要,例如痴呆/MCI/对照的临床上明确的样品。我们认为CSSC可以对临床表现进行更生态有效的估计,同时排除由不同的痴呆/MCI诊断标准引起的偏见。以及检测这些条件的熟练程度。结果行为测试特异性和敏感性之间存在明显的权衡。特异性最高的检测灵敏度最低,反之亦然。比较的特殊性和敏感性是,分别:光测(97%,47%),欧洲测试(94%,55%),ADAS(90%,68%),ACE-III(72%,77%),MoCA(55%,95%)。结论假设aCI患病率为10%,最短(〜3分钟)和最简单的仪器-光测,被证明具有最佳的整体性能(准确率92%,PPV66%,净现值94%)。
    BACKGROUND: Recent introductions of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer\'s disease have re-invigorated the cause of early dementia detection. Cognitive \"paper and pencil\" tests represent the bedrock of clinical assessment, because they are cheap, easy to perform, and do not require brain imaging or biological testing. Cognitive tests vary greatly in duration, complexity, sociolinguistic biases, probed cognitive domains, and their specificity and sensitivity of detecting cognitive impairment (CI). Consequently, an ecologically valid head-to-head comparison seems essential for evidence-based dementia screening.
    METHODS: We compared five tests: Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Alzheimer\'s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS), Addenbrooke\'s cognitive examination (ACE-III), euro-coin handling test (Eurotest), and image identification test (Phototest) on a large sample of seniors (N = 456, 77.9 ± 8 years, 71% females). Their specificity and sensitivity were estimated in a novel way by contrasting each test\'s outcome to the majority outcome across the remaining tests (comparative specificity and sensitivity calculation [CSSC]). This obviates the need for an a priori gold standard such as a clinically clear-cut sample of dementia/MCI/controls. We posit that the CSSC results in a more ecologically valid estimation of clinical performance while precluding biases resulting from different dementia/MCI diagnostic criteria and the proficiency in detecting these conditions.
    RESULTS: There exists a stark trade-off between behavioral test specificity and sensitivity. The test with the highest specificity had the lowest sensitivity, and vice versa. The comparative specificities and sensitivities were, respectively: Phototest (97%, 47%), Eurotest (94%, 55%), ADAS (90%, 68%), ACE-III (72%, 77%), MoCA (55%, 95%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Assuming a CI prevalence of 10%, the shortest (∼3 min) and the simplest instrument, the Phototest, was shown to have the best overall performance (accuracy 92%, PPV 66%, NPV 94%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性肾脏病-矿物质和骨骼疾病(CKD-MBD)与认知功能之间的关系仍然未知。本研究旨在探讨血液透析患者CKD-MBD与认知功能的相关性。
    方法:纳入年龄≥65岁无痴呆诊断的血液透析患者。使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评估认知功能。CKD-MBD标记,血清镁,完整的甲状旁腺激素(PTH),25-羟基维生素D(25-OHD),测量成纤维细胞生长因子(FGF)-23和可溶性α-klotho。
    结果:总体而言,390名患者,中位年龄74岁(四分位距,70-80)年,平均血清镁水平为2.4±0.3mg/dL,MoCA和MMSE得分中位数分别为25(22-26)和28(26-29),分别,进行了分析。根据未调整线性回归分析,高镁组的MoCA和MMSE评分(保留的认知功能)明显高于低镁组(β系数[95%置信区间(CI)]1.05[0.19,1.92],MoCA的P=0.017;1.2[0.46,1.94],MMSE的P=0.002)和具有痴呆危险因素的校正多变量分析(β系数[95%CI]1.12[0.22,2.02],MoCA的P=0.015;0.92[0.19,1.65],MMSE的P=0.014)。
    结论:较高的血清镁水平可能与血液透析患者的认知功能保持相关。相反,认知功能与完整PTH之间未观察到显着关联,25-OHD,FGF-23或可溶性α-klotho水平。
    BACKGROUND: The relationship between chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and cognitive function remains largely unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the association between CKD-MBD and cognitive function in patients on hemodialysis.
    METHODS: Hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 65 years without diagnosed dementia were included. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). CKD-MBD markers, serum magnesium, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23, and soluble α-klotho were measured.
    RESULTS: Overall, 390 patients with a median age of 74 (interquartile range, 70-80) years, mean serum magnesium level of 2.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL, and median MoCA and MMSE scores of 25 (22-26) and 28 (26-29), respectively, were analyzed. MoCA and MMSE scores were significantly higher (preserved cognitive function) in the high-magnesium group than in the low-magnesium group according to the unadjusted linear regression analysis (β coefficient [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.05 [0.19, 1.92], P = 0.017 for MoCA; 1.2 [0.46, 1.94], P = 0.002 for MMSE) and adjusted multivariate analysis with risk factors for dementia (β coefficient [95% CI] 1.12 [0.22, 2.02], P = 0.015 for MoCA; 0.92 [0.19, 1.65], P = 0.014 for MMSE).
    CONCLUSIONS: Higher serum magnesium levels might be associated with preserved cognitive function in hemodialysis patients. Conversely, significant associations were not observed between cognitive function and intact PTH, 25-OHD, FGF-23, or soluble α-klotho levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知功能障碍和痴呆(VCID)的血管性贡献是老年人认知功能下降的主要因素。本研究检查了通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量的脑血管反应性(CVR)与认知功能之间的关系。使用预定义的假设。
    方法:我们在总共三个分析点和263名受试者中进行了研究。每个部位使用5%二氧化碳吸入进行相同的CVRMRI程序。使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的全球认知测量和项目反应理论(IRT)评分的执行功能测量作为结果。
    结果:CVR和MoCA呈正相关,并且这种关系在所有分析站点都得到了复制.CVR与执行功能呈正相关。
    结论:关于CVR与整体认知评分之间的关联的预定义假设在三个独立的分析站点得到了验证,为CVR作为VCID中的生物标志物提供支持。
    结论:这项研究测量了小动脉的一种新功能指标,称为脑血管反应性(CVR)。CVR与老年人的整体认知呈正相关。这一发现在三个地点的三个独立队列中观察到。我们的统计分析计划是在开始数据收集之前预先定义的。
    BACKGROUND: Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) represent a major factor in cognitive decline in older adults. The present study examined the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cognitive function in a multi-site study, using a predefined hypothesis.
    METHODS: We conducted the study in a total of three analysis sites and 263 subjects. Each site performed an identical CVR MRI procedure using 5% carbon dioxide inhalation. A global cognitive measure of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and an executive function measure of item response theory (IRT) score were used as outcomes.
    RESULTS: CVR and MoCA were positively associated, and this relationship was reproduced at all analysis sites. CVR was found to be positively associated with executive function.
    CONCLUSIONS: The predefined hypothesis on the association between CVR and a global cognitive score was validated in three independent analysis sites, providing support for CVR as a biomarker in VCID.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study measured a novel functional index of small arteries referred to as cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). CVR was positively associated with global cognition in older adults. This finding was observed in three independent cohorts at three sites. Our statistical analysis plan was predefined before beginning data collection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号