Medication Systems, Hospital

药物系统 ,医院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已经开发了几种药物-药物相互作用(DDI)检查程序,例如DDI-Predictor,用于检测和分级DDI。DDI-Predictor基于曲线下面积的比率来估计相互作用的大小。本研究的目的是分析涉及众所周知的强相互作用剂如利福平和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的DDI的频率,根据使用DDI-Predictor的临床药学团队的报告,和药师干预的接受率。
    方法:计算涉及利福平或SSRIs氟西汀的DDI的药师干预率和医师接受率,帕罗西汀,度洛西汀和舍曲林.采用双侧χ2检验或Fisher精确检验比较。
    结果:在记录的284个DDI中,38例(13.4%)涉及利福平,78例(27.5%)涉及SSRIs。药剂师干预率显着差异(利福平为68.4%,SSRI为48.8%;p=0.045),但医师接受率却没有差异(利福平为84.6%,SSRI为81.6%;p=1)。当DDI-Predictor中药物浓度与时间曲线下面积的比值>2时,SSRIs的药物干预更为频繁。药剂师更有可能发布涉及利福平的DDI的药剂师干预,因为治疗失败的风险很高,并且不太可能发布涉及SSRI的DDI的药剂师干预。除非怀疑的互动很强烈。
    结论:DDI检查可以帮助药剂师管理涉及强相互作用者的DDI。涉及强抑制剂的DDI与强诱导剂的DDI在干预和接受率方面有所不同。特别是由于对DDI大小的估计。
    OBJECTIVE: Several drug-drug interaction (DDI) checkers such as DDI-Predictor have been developed to detect and grade DDIs. DDI-Predictor gives an estimate of the magnitude of an interaction based on the ratio of areas under the curve. The objective of the present study was to analyse the frequencies of DDIs involving well-known strong interactors such as rifampicin and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as reported by a clinical pharmacy team using DDI-Predictor, and the pharmacist intervention acceptance rate.
    METHODS: The pharmacist intervention rate and the physician acceptance rate were calculated for DDIs involving rifampicin or the SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine and sertraline. The rates were compared with a bilateral χ2 test or Fisher\'s exact test.
    RESULTS: Of the 284 DDIs recorded, 38 (13.4%) involved rifampicin and 78 (27.5%) involved SSRIs. The pharmacist intervention rate differed significantly (68.4% for rifampicin vs 48.8% for SSRIs; p=0.045) but the physician acceptance rate did not (84.6% for rifampicin vs 81.6% for SSRIs; p=1). Pharmaceutical interventions for SSRIs were more frequent when the ratio of the area under the drug concentration versus time curve in DDI-Predictor was >2. Pharmacists were more likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving rifampicin because of a high perceived risk of treatment failure and were less likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving an SSRI, except when the suspected interaction was strong.
    CONCLUSIONS: DDI checkers can help pharmacists to manage DDIs involving strong interactors. DDIs involving strong inhibitors versus a strong inducer differ with regard to their intervention and acceptance rates, notably due to the estimation of the magnitude of the DDI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:药物干预是由医院临床药师提出的建议,以解决处方审查过程中药物的次优使用问题。药物干预措施包括确定与药物有关的问题,他们的预防和解决。这项研究的目的是利用新开发的深度神经网络分类器来识别药物干预措施中与药物相关的问题,并在法国大学医院进行为期3年的大型回顾性描述性分析。
    方法:数据收集自2018年至2020年的处方支持软件。然后使用在Python3.8中运行并使用Keras库的分类器根据法国临床药学学会的编码自动将药物相关问题与药物干预分类。
    结果:分析了2930656个处方行,共119689名患者。在这些处方线中,153335(5.2%)导致药物干预(n=48202名患者;40.2%)。药物干预主要在65岁或以上的患者中观察到(53186例患者中的26141例;49.1%)和服用5种或更多药物的患者中观察到(93419例患者中的44702例;47.8%)。与药物干预相关的最常见的药物相关问题类型是“不符合指南或禁忌症”(n=88523;57.7%),“用药过量”(16975;11.1%)和“不当管理”(13898;9.1%)。最常见的药物是:对乙酰氨基酚(n=10585;6.9%),埃索美拉唑(6031;3.9%),氢氯噻嗪(2951;1.9%),依诺肝素(2191;1.4%),曲马多(1879;1.2%),钙(2073;1.3%),培多普利(1950年;1.2%),氨氯地平(1716;1.1%),辛伐他汀(1560;1.0%)和胰岛素(1019;0.7%)。
    结论:所使用的深度神经网络分类器满足了从大型数据库中自动对药物干预措施中的药物相关问题进行分类而无需动员大量人力资源的挑战。使用这样的分类器可以导致提醒护理人员关于处方和管理中的某些风险做法,并触发行动,以改善患者的治疗结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical interventions are proposals made by hospital clinical pharmacists to address sub-optimal uses of medications during prescription review. Pharmaceutical interventions include the identification of drug-related problems, their prevention and resolution. The objective of this study was to exploit a newly developed deep neural network classifier to identify drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions and perform a large retrospective descriptive analysis of them in a French university hospital over a 3-year period.
    METHODS: Data were collected from prescription support software from 2018 to 2020. A classifier running in Python 3.8 and using Keras library was then used to automatically categorise drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions according to the coding of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy.
    RESULTS: 2 930 656 prescription lines were analysed for a total of 119 689 patients. Among these prescription lines, 153 335 (5.2%) resulted in pharmaceutical interventions (n=48 202 patients; 40.2%). Pharmaceutical interventions were predominantly observed in patients aged 65 years or older (n=26 141 patients out of 53 186; 49.1%) and in patients taking five or more medications (44 702 patients out of 93 419; 47.8%). The most frequently identified types of drug-related problems associated with pharmaceutical interventions were \'Non-conformity to guidelines or contra-indication\' (n=88 523; 57.7%), \'Overdosage\' (16 975; 11.1%) and \'Improper administration\' (13 898; 9.1%). The most frequently encountered drugs were: paracetamol (n=10 585; 6.9%), esomeprazole (6031; 3.9%), hydrochlorothiazide (2951; 1.9%), enoxaparin (2191; 1.4%), tramadol (1879; 1.2%), calcium (2073; 1.3%), perindopril (1950; 1.2%), amlodipine (1716; 1.1%), simvastatin (1560; 1.0%) and insulin (1019; 0.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The deep neural network classifier used met the challenge of automatically classifying drug-related problems from pharmaceutical interventions from a large database without mobilising significant human resources. The use of such a classifier can lead to alerting caregivers about certain risky practices in prescription and administration, and triggering actions to improve patients\' therapeutic outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    条形码药物管理(BCMA)是在药物管理期间维持患者安全的经过验证的过程。然而,在急诊科保持遵守BCMA扫描有其挑战。为了克服这些挑战,手持设备,启用扫描技术,提供给每个护士。BCMA合规率在6个月内增加了20%。使用1:1型号时,手持设备可提高ED环境中的BCMA合规性。
    Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA) is a proven process for maintaining patient safety during medication administration. However, maintaining compliance with BCMA scanning in the Emergency Department has its challenges. To overcome these challenges handheld devices, enabled with scanning technology, were provided to each nurse. BCMA compliance rates increased by 20% over a 6-month period. Handheld devices work to improve BCMA compliance in the ED environment when using a 1:1 model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在丹麦医疗保健系统中,重组是一个持续的过程,以适应不断增加的患者人数并优化资源分配。为了减轻北丹麦地区医院的部门负担,门诊病人有权从取药柜收取免费药物。储物柜的功能类似于包装盒,从而增强患者的自由度。由于在已发表的文献中缺乏有关免费药品和药品废物的证据,我们研究的目的是确定运送到取药柜的常见药物,其次,评估潜在的药物废物。
    方法:来自ApoVision的数据提供了有关2023年3月至10月在北丹麦地区运送到药品取药柜的药物的见解。为了估计未使用的药物,我们获得了有关从药品取药柜返回的药物数量的数据。
    结果:从2020年到2023年,在取药柜接受免费药物的患者人数增加。总的来说,2023年3月至10月,北丹麦地区约有3万包药品被运送到取药柜;1.7%被退回.甲氨蝶呤,阿达木单抗,奥马珠单抗和奥马珠单抗是最常见的分娩方式之一,也是从取药储物柜中回收最多的三个分娩方式.
    结论:这项研究是初步尝试调查通过提箱分配给门诊患者的免费药物中潜在的药物浪费。从2023年3月至10月,抗肿瘤剂和免疫调节剂是北丹麦地区最常见的药物取药柜。在这个时期,大约2%的已交付药物包装被退回医院药房.我们的分析仅集中在与未从药物提取储物柜中收集的药物相关的废物上。解决医院环境中药品废物的影响需要采取全面的方法,因此,未来的研究还应集中在与药物废物相关的其他场所,例如,病人的家庭。
    OBJECTIVE: In the Danish healthcare system, restructuring is an ongoing process to accommodate the rising number of patients and to optimise resource allocation. To ease departmental burdens at hospitals in the North Denmark Region, outpatients are empowered to collect their cost-free medicines from medication pick-up lockers. The lockers function similarly to a package box, thereby enhancing patient freedom. Due to lack of evidence within the published literature regarding cost-free medicines and medicine waste, the aim of our study was to identify the common medications delivered to medicine pick-up lockers and secondly, to evaluate potential medicine waste.
    METHODS: Data from ApoVision provided insights into medications delivered to medicine pick-up lockers from March to October 2023 in the North Denmark Region. To estimate unused medicines we obtained data on the number of medications returned from medicine pick-up lockers.
    RESULTS: From 2020 to 2023, the number of patients receiving cost-free medicines at medication pick-up lockers increased. In total, approximately 30 000 packages of medicine were delivered to medicine pick-up lockers from March to October 2023 in the North Denmark Region; 1.7% were returned. Methotrexate, adalimumab, and omalizumab were among the most common deliveries and were also the three most returned from the medicine pick-up lockers.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is an initial attempt to investigate potential medicine waste in cost-free medicines dispensed to outpatients via pick-up lockers. Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents were the most common medicines delivered to medication pick-up lockers in the North Denmark Region from March to October 2023. In this period, approximately 2% of all delivered medicine packages were returned to the hospital pharmacy. Our analysis solely focuses on waste associated with medications left uncollected from medicine pick-up lockers. Addressing the impact of medicine waste in a hospital setting requires a comprehensive approach, thus future studies should also focus on other sites relevant for medication waste as, for example, the patient\'s household.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建立质子泵抑制剂(PPI-MS)临床应用监测体系,加强成人住院患者PPI应用不当的检测和干预。
    方法:将自然语言处理技术应用于治疗性PPI应用的适应症识别和预防性PPI应用的入院记录识别评估。症状判断基于时态否定模型和正则表达式。临床PPI应用的循证规则被嵌入到PPI-MS的构建中。对2022年7月至2023年7月使用PPI的9421例患者记录进行了分析,以验证系统的性能并确定与不适当的临床PPI使用相关的常见问题。
    结果:在使用PPI检测到的9421名住院患者中,4736(50.27%)用于预防,其余用于治疗。在预防性药物中,2274名患者(48.02%)被确定为接受不适当的预防性PPI。主要原因是没有指征的不当预防。此外,258例不适当的PPI治疗使用被确定,主要涉及使用埃索美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡和Zollinger-Ellison综合征。PPI合理用药监测系统的效率,再加上人类的参与,是人工监测的32倍。在不适当预防性使用PPI的情况下,45.29%是由于缺乏适应症,28.34%涉及不适当的管理途径,15.74%与不适当的给药频率有关,10.62%归因于不适当的药物选择。其中933例与使用抗血小板和抗凝药物有关,708例与使用非甾体类抗炎药有关。PPI-MS系统的总体准确度为88.69%,召回率为99.33%,F1评分为93.71%。
    结论:通过自然语言处理技术建立PPI用药监测系统,在确保准确性和召回率的同时,提高评价效率和同质性。这为及时检测与临床PPI使用相关的问题提供了新的解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To establish a clinical application monitoring system for proton pump inhibitors (PPI-MS) and to enhance the detection and intervention of inappropriate PPI use in adult hospitalised patients.
    METHODS: Natural language processing technology was applied to indication recognition of therapeutic PPI applications and the assessment of admission record recognition for preventive PPI applications. Symptom judgement was based on the tense-negation model and regular expressions. Evidence-based rules for clinical PPI application were embedded for the construction of PPI-MS. A total of 9421 patient records using PPI from July 2022 to July 2023 were analysed to validate the performance of the system and to identify common issues related to inappropriate clinical PPI use.
    RESULTS: Out of 9421 hospitalised patients detected using PPI, 4736 (50.27%) were used for prophylaxis and the rest for therapeutic use. Among the prophylactic medications, 2274 patients (48.02%) were identified as receiving inappropriate prophylactic PPI. The main reasons were inappropriate prophylaxis without indication. Additionally, 258 cases of inappropriate therapeutic PPI use were identified, mainly involving the use of esomeprazole for peptic ulcers and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The efficiency of the PPI rational medication monitoring system, when coupled with human involvement, was 32 times that of manual monitoring. Among cases of inappropriate prophylactic PPI use, 45.29% were due to lack of indications, 28.34% involved inappropriate administration routes, 15.74% were related to inappropriate dosing frequencies and 10.62% were attributed to inappropriate drug selection. There were 933 cases related to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs and 708 cases related to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The overall accuracy of the PPI-MS system was 88.69%, with a recall rate of 99.33%, and the F1 score was 93.71%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a PPI medication monitoring system through natural language processing technology, while ensuring accuracy and recall rates, improves evaluation efficiency and homogeneity. This provides a new solution for timely detection of issues relating to clinical PPI usage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定和促进医院药学计划,以改善西班牙医疗保健系统中遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)患者的管理。
    方法:由医院药剂师组成的专家小组,西班牙遗传性血管性水肿协会(AsociaciónEspañoladeAngioedemademiaFamiliar)的一名过敏症专科医生和一名护士/成员强调了在确定后改善HAE患者护理的举措,评估并优先考虑它们。根据对患者护理的影响以及以1-5的等级实施的可行性来评估优先级。
    结果:确定了医院药剂师在HAE患者管理中的作用的七个关键活动领域:药物的评估和选择;医院药房分配和远程药房;药物治疗随访和远程医疗;与参与HAE患者护理的其他医疗团队的协调;患者健康教育和培训;HAE研究;以及对医院药学服务人员的持续教育和培训。平均影响得分为5分和平均可行性得分为≥4.1分的10项举措被认为是高优先级举措。一半的举措属于与患者教育和培训有关的领域(50%),其次是护理协调计划(30%)和持续教育和培训(20%)。
    结论:专家小组确定了HAE患者管理的十项高优先级举措。医院药房服务部门实施此类举措应加强对西班牙医疗保健系统中HAE患者的管理。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify and promote hospital pharmacy initiatives to improve the management of patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) within the Spanish healthcare system.
    METHODS: A panel of experts comprising hospital pharmacists, an allergist and a nurse/member of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Association (Asociación Española de Angioedema Familiar) highlighted initiatives to improve care for patients with HAE after identifying, evaluating and prioritising them. Prioritisation was assessed based on the impact on patient care and the feasibility of their implementation on a scale of 1-5.
    RESULTS: Seven key areas of activity for the role of hospital pharmacists in the management of patients with HAE were identified: evaluation and selection of medicines; hospital pharmacy dispensation and telepharmacy; pharmacotherapy follow-up and telemedicine; coordination with other healthcare teams involved in the care of patients with HAE; patient health education and training; research on HAE; and continuous education and training of hospital pharmacy service personnel. Ten initiatives with a mean impact score of 5 and a mean feasibility score of ≥4.1 were considered as high-priority initiatives. Half of the initiatives belong to the area concerning patient education and training (50%), followed by care coordination initiatives (30%) and continuous education and training (20%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ten high-priority initiatives for the management of patients with HAE were identified by a panel of experts. The implementation of such initiatives by the hospital pharmacy service should enhance the management of patients with HAE in the Spanish healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:重症监护病房(ICU)的患者比普通病房的患者更容易发生用药错误。然而,对欧洲ICU使用的药物安全策略知之甚少。我们的目标是探索在欧洲ICU中使用和计划的策略,为了识别变异区域,并提供建议,以提高该患者组的用药安全性。
    方法:我们发布了一份在线调查,在七种欧洲语言中,通过专业网络和社交媒体。该调查探讨了一系列药物安全策略,以及它们是否正在使用(如果是,无论是完全还是部分实施)或正在计划中。还捕获了有关受访者及其ICU的人口统计信息。进行了描述性分析,其中包括探索地理变异。
    结果:我们获得了来自32个不同国家的587个有效回复,317名(54%)由药房工作人员完成。最普遍实施的药物安全实践是患者过敏对所有参与其护理的工作人员可见(382名(65%)受访者的ICU完全实施),标准化的紧急药物储存在固定的地方(337,57%),和使用标准化的药物浓度用于常用的静脉输液(330,56%)。电子处方系统在310个(53%)中全面实施。据报告,181个(31%)的ICU中,一名药剂师得到了全面执行,其中有126(70%)每周五天对所有订购的药物进行药剂师审查。重症监护药剂师在北欧ICU中最常见(在102个ICU中完全实施,占50%),在西欧(108个,65%)电子处方。
    结论:在欧洲ICU中使用的药物安全策略存在相当大的差异,在地理区域之间和之内。我们的发现可能有助于ICU工作人员确定应考虑实施的策略。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more vulnerable to medication errors than patients admitted to general wards. However, little is known about medication safety strategies used in European ICUs. Our objectives were to explore the strategies being used and being planned within European ICUs, to identify areas of variation, and to inform recommendations to improve medication safety in this patient group.
    METHODS: We distributed an online survey, in seven European languages, via professional networks and social media. The survey explored a range of medication safety strategies and whether they were in use (and if so, whether fully or partially implemented) or being planned. Demographic information about respondents and their ICUs was also captured. A descriptive analysis was conducted, which included exploring geographical variation.
    RESULTS: We obtained 587 valid responses from 32 different countries, with 317 (54%) completed by pharmacy staff. Medication safety practices most commonly implemented were patients\' allergies being visible for all staff involved in their care (fully implemented in 382 (65%) of respondents\' ICUs), standardised emergency medication stored in a fixed place (337, 57%), and use of standardised medication concentrations for commonly used intravenous infusions (330, 56%). Electronic prescribing systems were fully implemented in 310 (53%). A pharmacist was reported to be fully implemented in 181 (31%) of ICUs, of which there was 126 (70%) where there was a pharmacist review of all ordered medication five days per week. Critical care pharmacists were most common in Northern European ICUs (fully implemented to ICUs in 102, 50%) and electronic prescribing in Western Europe (108, 65%).
    CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in medication safety strategies used within European ICUs, both between and within geographical areas. Our findings may be helpful to ICU staff in identifying strategies that should be considered for implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:介绍了2023年ASHP全国医院药房实践调查的结果。
    方法:对美国1,497家普通医院和儿童外科医院的药房主任进行了调查,采用电子邮件和邮件联系的混合模式。使用Qualtrics在线完成调查。IQVIA提供了有关医院特征的数据;调查样本来自IQVIA的医院数据库。
    结果:有效率为21.6%。住院药剂师在26.7%的医院中独立开药。5.7%的医院使用高级分析。87.3%的医院使用基本分析。药剂师在54.2%的门诊诊所或初级保健诊所工作。大多数医院(86.1%)使用自动分配柜作为维持剂量分配的主要方法。73.6%的医院使用机器可读编码来验证药房配药期间的剂量。73.4%的医院使用了电子健康记录系统中的自动验证功能。大多数医院报告说,药房服务的一些整合,以优化患者护理过渡(60.0%),而24.9%的人报告没有整合。传统的技术人员活动仍然占主导地位,但是更高级的角色正在出现。62.8%的医院使用辅助无菌产品制备的技术。
    结论:药物分布继续朝着分散模式发展,药物更接近患者。技术使这种转变能够发生,而不会对患者安全产生重大负面影响。药房劳动力稳定,更高级的职责被分配给药学技术人员,使药剂师能够增加他们的临床作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Results of the 2023 ASHP National Survey of Pharmacy Practice in Hospital Settings are presented.
    METHODS: Pharmacy directors at 1,497 general and children\'s medical-surgical hospitals in the United States were surveyed using a mixed-mode method of contact by email and mail. Survey completion was online using Qualtrics. IQVIA supplied data on hospital characteristics; the survey sample was drawn from IQVIA\'s hospital database.
    RESULTS: The response rate was 21.6%. Inpatient pharmacists independently prescribe medications in 26.7% of hospitals. Advanced analytics are used in 5.7% of hospitals. Basic analytics are used in 87.3% of hospitals. Pharmacists work in ambulatory or primary care clinics in 54.2% of hospitals operating outpatient clinics. Most hospitals (86.1%) use automated dispensing cabinets as the primary method of maintenance dose distribution. Machine-readable coding is used in 73.6% of hospitals to verify doses during dispensing in the pharmacy. Autoverification functionality in the electronic health record system is used in 73.4% of hospitals. Most hospitals report some integration of pharmacy services to optimize patient care transitions (60.0%), while 24.9% report no integration. Traditional technician activities still predominate, but more advanced roles are emerging. Technologies to assist sterile product preparation are used in 62.8% of hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Drug distribution continues to trend toward decentralized models with medications available closer to patients. Technologies are enabling this transition to occur without a significant negative impact on patient safety. The pharmacy workforce is stable, and more advanced responsibilities are being assigned to pharmacy technicians, enabling pharmacists to increase their clinical role.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗保健行业的全球年度碳足迹为2千兆吨CO2e,医疗保健系统必须为应对气候变化做出贡献。由于医院药剂师在管理医疗保健产品中的作用,他们可能是生态转型的关键参与者。这项研究的目的是总结在涉及药剂师的医疗机构中实施干预措施的证据,以改善医疗保健的环境足迹。
    方法:本系统评价是根据PRISMA2020指南进行的。Medline,在WebofScience和ScienceDirect数据库中搜索了2013年至2023年之间发表的研究。有资格被列入名单,研究必须包括医院药剂师,并提出旨在减少医疗保健机构中医疗保健的环境足迹的贡献。结果是对贡献的描述,所使用的方法和分析的医疗保健产品生命周期的阶段。使用混合方法评估工具评估每个研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:共纳入17项研究。药剂师在15位(88%)中发挥了主导作用,在其他方面发挥了辅助作用。针对的医疗保健产品是药物(59%),医疗器械(12%)或两者(29%)。贡献所解决的医疗保健产品周期的阶段是消除(71%),配药(35%),采购和供应(35%),产量(29%),和处方(24%)。只有两项研究使用了生命周期评估,只有一项研究评估了可持续性的所有三个支柱。两项研究具有良好的方法学质量,其余研究至少有一个不确定性。
    结论:这篇综述证实了药剂师的核心作用以及多学科方法在实施生态责任行动中的重要性。这对希望改善可持续行动的医院和其他团队可能很有用,它强调了在规划可持续行动时与药剂师合作的重要性。未来的生态责任举措必须使用稳健的可重复方法。
    背景:PROSPERO#CRD42023406835。
    BACKGROUND: With a global annual carbon footprint of the healthcare sector of 2 gigatons of CO2e, healthcare systems must contribute to the fight against climate change. Hospital pharmacists could be key players in ecological transition due to their role in managing healthcare products. The aim of this study was to summarise the evidence on interventions implemented in healthcare facilities involving pharmacists to improve the environmental footprint of healthcare.
    METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The Medline, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases were searched for studies published between 2013 and 2023. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to include hospital pharmacists and present contributions aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of healthcare in healthcare facilities. Outcomes were the description of the contribution, the methods used and the stages of healthcare product lifecycle analysed. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the risk of bias for each study.
    RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included. Pharmacists played a leading role in 15 (88%) and had a supporting role in the others. The healthcare products targeted were medicines (59%), medical devices (12%) or both (29%). The stages of the healthcare product cycle addressed by the contributions were elimination (71%), dispensing (35%), procurement and supply (35%), production (29%), and prescription (24%). Only two studies used life cycle assessment and only one assessed all three pillars of sustainability. Two studies had good methodological quality while the rest had at least one element of uncertainty.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms the central role of the pharmacist and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in implementing eco-responsible actions. It could be useful to hospitals and other teams wanting to improve sustainable actions and it emphasises the importance of collaborating with pharmacists when planning sustainable initiatives. Future eco-responsible initiatives must use robust reproducible methods.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO #CRD42023406835.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:用药错误(MEs)是医疗保健系统中发病率和死亡率的主要原因。由于疾病的严重程度,入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者可能更容易受到ME的影响,他们接受治疗的复杂性和ICU设置的挑战性。欧洲医院药剂师协会成立了一个特殊兴趣小组(SIG),以开展一项工作计划,以制定和优先考虑建议,以支持整个欧洲ICU的药物安全改善。
    方法:在文献综述和相关利益相关者参与后,制定了关于ICU环境中用药安全的初步政策建议。由SIG的21名成员组成的Delphi小组,其中包括具有ICU和/或药物安全专业知识的医疗保健专业人员(HCP),于2022年召开。我们使用改进的Delphi技术进行了两轮,参与者根据他们的实施优先级,以9分的李克特量表对政策建议进行匿名排名。
    结果:总计,提出了32项政策建议。在德尔菲第一轮中,有19个HCP参加;对大多数建议达成了共识,对六个建议达成了部分共识。在德尔福第二轮中,有18个HCP参加。经过两轮Delphi,就所有32项建议达成了共识。所有建议都被认为是“高优先级”,除了一个被认为是“中优先级”。
    结论:通过这项研究,可以制定并优先考虑循证政策建议,以提高药物安全性。这可能有助于减少整个欧洲ICU中的MEs。除一项建议外,所有建议均被视为“高度优先”以执行,表明这些建议在通过预防ICU中的MES来提高药物安全性方面的感知价值。
    OBJECTIVE: Medication errors (MEs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more susceptible to MEs due to severity of illness, the complexity of treatments they receive and the challenging nature of the ICU setting. The European Association of Hospital Pharmacists established a Special Interest Group (SIG) to undertake a programme of work to develop and prioritise recommendations to support medication safety improvement in ICUs across Europe.
    METHODS: Initial policy recommendations for medication safety within the ICU environment were developed following reviews of the literature and engagement with relevant stakeholders. A Delphi panel of 21 members of the SIG, that comprised healthcare professionals (HCPs) with expertise in ICU and/or medication safety, was convened in 2022. We conducted two rounds using a modified Delphi technique whereby participants anonymously ranked on a 9-point Likert Scale the policy recommendations according to their priority for implementation.
    RESULTS: In total, 32 policy recommendations were developed. In Delphi Round 1, 19 HCPs participated; consensus was achieved on most recommendations and partial consensus on six. In Delphi Round 2, 18 HCPs participated. After two Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved on all 32 recommendations. All recommendations were considered \'high priority\' except one that was considered \'medium priority\'.
    CONCLUSIONS: Through this study it was possible to develop and prioritise evidence-based policy recommendations to enhance medication safety, which may contribute to reducing MEs in ICUs across Europe. All recommendations were considered \'high priority\' for implementation except one, indicating the perceived value of these recommendations in improving medication safety through preventing MEs in ICUs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号