Marijuana abuse

大麻滥用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着大麻使用量的增加和联邦限制的放松,重要的是认识到其潜在的不良心血管作用,以便更好地进行风险分层和知情指导.我们使用2016年至2019年的全国住院患者样本数据库进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了39,992名受试者。根据大麻相关疾病的存在,将提取的人群分为两组。研究的主要结局是心血管相关的不良事件,住院死亡率,住院总费用,和心律失常.该研究得出结论,大麻使用障碍与心血管不良事件的可能性没有显着相关,心律失常,或控制其他变量时的住院费用(分别为p=0.257,p=0.481和p=0.481)。然而,它与死亡可能性显著相关(p<0.0001).需要进一步的随机试验来证实这些发现并详细说明已确定的关联。
    As cannabis use is rising and federal restrictions are easing, it is important to recognize its potential adverse cardiovascular effects for better risk stratification and informed guidance. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019, where 39,992 subjects were enrolled. The extracted population was classified into two groups based on the presence of cannabis-related disorders. The primary outcomes of the study were cardiovascular-related adverse events, in-hospital mortality, total cost of hospitalization, and cardiac dysrhythmias. The study concluded that cannabis use disorder was not significantly associated with the likelihood of having a cardiovascular adverse event, cardiac dysrhythmias, or with the cost of hospitalization when controlling for other variables (p = 0.257, p=0.481 & p = 0.481, respectively). However, it was significantly associated with the likelihood of mortality (p < 0.0001). Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and elaborate on identified associations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了大麻使用障碍(CUD)对住院患者发病率的影响,停留时间(LOS)以及接受泌尿外科肿瘤手术患者的住院费用(IC)。
    方法:对2003年至2014年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)进行了前列腺切除术的分析,肾切除术,或膀胱切除术(n=1,612,743)。使用ICD-9代码鉴定CUD。使用复杂的调查程序来比较有和没有CUD的患者。住院患者主要并发症,高LOS(第四四分位数),和高IC(第四四分位数)作为终点。进行单变量和多变量分析(MVA)以比较组。
    结果:CUD的发生率从2003年的每100,000例入院51例增加到2014年的每100,000例383例(p<0.001)。总的来说,3,503名招生有CUD。CUD患者更年轻(50vs.61),男性(86%vs.78.4%),黑色(21.7%与9.2%),并拥有第一四分位数的收入(36.1%与20.6%);所有p<0.001。CUD对任何并发症发生率均无影响(均P>0.05)。然而,CUD患者的LOS较高(3vs.2天;p<0.001)和IC($15,609vs.$12,415;p<0.001)。在MVA上,CUD不是主要并发症的独立预测因子(p=0.6)。相反,CUD与高LOS(比值比(OR)1.31;95%CI1.08-1.59)和高IC(OR1.33;95%CI1.12-1.59)相关,两者p<0.01。
    结论:泌尿外科手术时CUD的发生率正在增加。未来的研究应该研究我们观察到的现象的原因以及如何降低CUD患者的LOS和IC。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of cannabis use disorder (CUD) on inpatient morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient cost (IC) of patients undergoing urologic oncologic surgery.
    METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2014 was analyzed for patients undergoing prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy (n = 1,612,743). CUD was identified using ICD-9 codes. Complex-survey procedures were used to compare patients with and without CUD. Inpatient major complications, high LOS (4th quartile), and high IC (4th quartile) were examined as endpoints. Univariable and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to compare groups.
    RESULTS: The incidence of CUD increased from 51 per 100,000 admissions in 2003 to 383 per 100,000 in 2014 (p < 0.001). Overall, 3,503 admissions had CUD. Patients with CUD were more frequently younger (50 vs. 61), male (86% vs. 78.4%), Black (21.7% vs. 9.2%), and had 1st quartile income (36.1% vs. 20.6%); all p < 0.001. CUD had no impact on any complication rates (all p > 0.05). However, CUD patients had higher LOS (3 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001) and IC ($15,609 vs. $12,415; p < 0.001). On MVA, CUD was not an independent predictor of major complications (p = 0.6). Conversely, CUD was associated with high LOS (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.59) and high IC (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59), both p < 0.01.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CUD at the time of urologic oncologic surgery is increasing. Future research should look into the cause of our observed phenomena and how to decrease LOS and IC in CUD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    似乎THC剂量是下丘脑垂体肾上腺(HPA)轴失调与自杀念头和行为(STB)之间的联系。我们提出了一种基于皮质醇和THC剂量相互作用的新模型来理解STB的潜在病理生理机制。从2019年9月1日到2024年1月1日,我们进行了以人口为基础的,配对,嵌套病例对照研究是由三波完整的纵向,对国会60名客户进行的多中心队列研究。共有368名男性持续大麻使用者(CCu)被分配到四个类别,包括低,中等和高THC剂量和复发,使用最优匹配。使用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS-MS)分析唾液中的几种HPA轴测量值,通过气相色谱/质谱(GC-MS)评估尿液中的羧酸水平。我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)来检验感兴趣变量与模型拟合检验之间的关系,并采用Akaike信息准则(AIC)对模型拟合度进行比较,选择拟合度最佳的模型。还计算了最佳拟合模式的人群归因分数(PAF)和累积风险评分。分析显示,报告大量使用大麻的皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)和昼夜皮质醇斜率(DCS)和曲线下面积(AUC)较高的个体发生STB的可能性比对照组高三倍以上(OR3.2,95%CI2.4-4.1)。这些发现表明特定的皮质醇分泌模式在STB临床表达增加中的重要性,并且可能是指导该领域预防工作的重要因素。
    It appears that the THC dosage is the link between dysregulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB). We proposed a new model to understand the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of STB based on the interaction of cortisol and THC dosage. From September 1, 2019, to January 1, 2024, we conducted a population-based, matched-pair, nested case-control study resulting from a three-wave complete longitudinal, multicenter cohort study on a sample of congress 60 clients. A total of 368 male continued cannabis users (CCu) were allocated to four categories, including low, moderate and high THC dosages and relapse, using optimal matching. Several HPA axis measures were analyzed in the saliva using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), and carboxylic acids levels in the urine were assessed via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the relationship between the variables of interest and the model fit test, and used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to compare the model fit and select the best-fitting model. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) and cumulative risk score were also calculated for the best-fitting pattern. The analysis showed that the likelihood of STB in individuals with a cortisol awakening response (CAR) and a blunted diurnal cortisol slope (DCS) and higher area under the curve (AUC) who reported heavy cannabis use was more than three times higher than the control group (OR 3.2, 95 % CI 2.4-4.1). These findings indicate the importance of the specific cortisol secretion pattern in the increased clinical expression of STB and may be an important factor for guiding preventive efforts in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定使用缓释混合苯丙胺盐(MAS-ER)治疗同时发生的成人ADHD和大麻使用障碍(CUD)是否可以有效改善ADHD症状并促进禁欲。
    一项为期12周的随机研究,双盲,针对患有ADHD和CUD的成人(n=28)进行的双臂试点可行性试验,比较MAS-ER(80mg)和安慰剂。主要结果:ADHD:症状减轻≥30%,通过成人ADHD研究者症状评定量表(AISRS)进行测量。CUD:在维持阶段的最后2周观察期间禁欲。
    总的来说,药物耐受性良好。ADHD症状减轻(MAS-ER:83.3%;安慰剂:71.4%;p=0.65)或大麻禁欲(MAS-ER:15.4%;安慰剂:0%;p=0.27)没有显着差异。与安慰剂相比,MAS-ER组显示每周大麻使用天数随时间显着减少(p<0.0001)。
    MAS-ER一般耐受性良好。样本量小,无法确定MAS-ER的优越性,从而减轻ADHD症状或促进禁欲。值得注意的是,随着时间的推移,MAS-ER显著减少了每周的使用天数。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine if treatment of co-occurring adult ADHD and Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) with extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (MAS-ER) would be effective at improving ADHD symptoms and promoting abstinence.
    UNASSIGNED: A 12-week randomized, double-blind, two-arm pilot feasibility trial of adults with comorbid ADHD and CUD (n = 28) comparing MAS-ER (80 mg) to placebo. Main outcomes: ADHD: ≥30% symptom reduction, measured by the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS). CUD: Abstinence during last 2 observed weeks of maintenance phase.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, medication was well-tolerated. There was no significant difference in ADHD symptom reduction (MAS-ER: 83.3%; placebo: 71.4%; p = .65) or cannabis abstinence (MAS-ER: 15.4%; placebo: 0%; p = .27). MAS-ER group showed a significant decrease in weekly cannabis use days over time compared to placebo (p < .0001).
    UNASSIGNED: MAS-ER was generally well-tolerated. The small sample size precluded a determination of MAS-ER\'s superiority reducing ADHD symptoms or promoting abstinence. Notably, MAS-ER significantly reduced weekly days of use over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大约16.5%的美国年轻人患有大麻使用障碍(CUD),并且有负面结果的风险。治疗可以减少大麻的使用,但是年轻人比老年人更不可能寻求帮助。对等网络咨询-txt(PNC-txt)是一个简短的,文本交付,动机性访谈知情物质使用干预措施,重点关注同伴关系和活动空间作为行为改变的机制。PNC-txt已显示出减少青少年和年轻人使用烟草和大麻的证据,但尚未在合法使用大麻的情况下进行测试。目前的随机对照试验试图扩大关于PNC-txt效应背景的证据,比较大麻合法的州(科罗拉多州)和不合法的州(田纳西州)。我们假设随机分配到PNC-txt的参与者与对照组相比,大麻的使用显着减少,女性和科罗拉多州的女性减少幅度更大,同伴关系和活动空间将调解效果。
    方法:一千个,符合CUD筛查标准和经生物验证的大麻使用情况的78名18-25岁(CO:551;TN:527)被随机分配至PNC-txt或等待名单控制条件.每隔一天,连续4周,分配给PNC-txt的参与者收到了预编程的文本对话,通过基线评估的数据定制。大麻使用的自我报告和生物学指标在1-,3-,和6个月。
    结论:数据分析正在进行中。结果将提供有关是否,以及如何,PNC-txt减少了CUD年轻人的大麻使用。
    背景:该试验于2020年9月28日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04567394)进行了前瞻性注册。
    BACKGROUND: Approximately 16.5% of U.S. young adults have a cannabis use disorder (CUD) and are at risk for negative outcomes. Treatment can reduce cannabis use, but young adults are less likely to seek help than older adults. Peer Network Counseling-txt (PNC-txt) is a brief, text-delivered, Motivational Interviewing-informed substance use intervention focusing on peer relations and activity spaces as mechanisms for behavioral change. PNC-txt has shown evidence of reducing tobacco and cannabis use with adolescents and young adults, but it has not been tested in the context of legal cannabis use. The current randomized controlled trial sought to expand the evidence regarding the context of PNC-txt effects, comparing one state in which cannabis is legal (Colorado) and one state in which it is not (Tennessee). We hypothesized that participants randomized to PNC-txt would show significant reductions in cannabis use compared to controls, with larger reductions for females and those in Colorado, and that peer relations and activity space would mediate effects.
    METHODS: One thousand, seventy eight 18-25 year olds (CO: 551; TN: 527) who met screening criteria for CUD and biologically-verified cannabis use were randomly assigned to PNC-txt or waitlist control condition. Every other day for 4 weeks, participants assigned to PNC-txt received pre-programmed text conversations, tailored via data from the baseline assessment. Self-report and biological indicators of cannabis use were measured at 1-, 3-, and 6-months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis is underway. Results will provide evidence regarding whether, and how, PNC-txt reduces cannabis use in young adults with CUD.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was prospectively registered on September 28, 2020 with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04567394).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:性别特异性干预措施对于解决物质使用障碍-特别是大麻使用障碍-至关重要,因为它们允许定制的治疗方法并增加成功结果的可能性。然而,男性和女性之间的治疗过程和结果的差异往往没有观察到,使得此类干预措施的预后和发展更加困难。
    目的:这项研究旨在研究性别在以大麻使用指标为特征的治疗入院概况与性别不平等的社会人口统计学来源之间的关系中的调节作用(例如,就业状况)以及出院时的依从性和结果。
    方法:对3,814名被诊断为大麻使用障碍的门诊患者进行了一项多中心回顾性观察性研究。使用电子健康记录进行数据分析。
    结果:性别与儿童数量之间的相互作用,以及预处理大麻的使用,预测较低的治疗依从性,尤其是女性。此外,性别和儿童数量之间的相互作用预测出院时的结果,与男性相比,女性的辍学可能性更高。
    结论:对于在治疗前一个月内吸食大麻的女性(尤其是有孩子的女性),应优先考虑加强应急管理方案的综合治疗。采用纳入性别/性别敏感的治疗师培训和评估措施的治疗政策框架对于优化所有患者的治疗结果至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Gender-specific interventions are crucial in addressing substance use disorders -particularly cannabis use disorder - as they allow for tailored therapeutic approaches and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes. However, differences in therapeutic processes and outcomes between males and females are often not observed, making the prognosis and development of such interventions more difficult.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the moderating role of sex in the relationship between treatment admission profile characterized by indicators of cannabis use and sociodemographic sources of gender inequality (e.g., employment status) and adherence and outcome at discharge.
    METHODS: A multicentric retrospective observational study was conducted with a sample of 3,814 outpatients diagnosed with cannabis use disorder. Electronic health records were used for data analysis.
    RESULTS: The interaction between sex and the number of children, as well as pre-treatment cannabis use, predicted lower treatment adherence, particularly among females. Additionally, the interaction between sex and the number of children predicted outcomes at discharge, with females showing a higher likelihood of dropout compared to males.
    CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced comprehensive treatment with intensified contingency management programs should be prioritized for females (especially those with children) who have consumed cannabis in the month before treatment. Adopting a treatment policy framework incorporating sex/gender-sensitive therapist training and evaluative measures is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes for all patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在整个青春期,大麻使用和抑郁症状的患病率均增加。同时,大脑正在重要的边缘区域进行神经发育,比如杏仁核.先前的研究表明,杏仁核也可能与使用大麻和抑郁症状有关。我们旨在研究青少年使用大麻对杏仁核体积的影响,以及大麻使用和杏仁核形态计量学对青少年抑郁症状的相互作用。
    方法:两百二十四名参与者(12-15岁),按出生时的性别平衡,根据头发毒理学和大麻使用的自我报告指标,从青少年大脑认知发育(ABCD)研究的子样本中选择。对头发中的大麻素和/或自我报告的大麻使用呈阳性的参与者在人口统计学上与没有自我报告或确认使用大麻的年轻人相匹配。这些年轻人的监护人在儿童行为清单上报告了抑郁症状。线性混合效应模型运行调查大麻使用组对杏仁核体积的影响,控制整个大脑的体积和扫描仪类型的随机效应。其他分析检查了大麻组状态和双侧杏仁核体积对抑郁症状的影响。
    结果:大麻的使用与杏仁核体积没有显着相关,但与抑郁症状增加有关(p<0.01)。大麻组与杏仁核体积相互作用,因此,在大麻组中,体积较小的个体抑郁症状增加(p<0.01-0.02)。
    结论:在青春期早期没有发现基于大麻使用的杏仁核体积畸变;然而,更多的抑郁症状与大麻组有关。使用大麻且杏仁核体积较小的年轻人抑郁症状的风险增加,提示使用大麻的潜在神经脆弱性。
    BACKGROUND: Both cannabis use and depressive symptomology increase in prevalence throughout adolescence. Concurrently, the brain is undergoing neurodevelopment in important limbic regions, such as the amygdala. Prior research indicates the amygdala may also be related to cannabis use and depressive symptoms. We aimed to investigate the effects of adolescent cannabis use on amygdala volumes as well as the interaction of cannabis use and amygdala morphometry on depressive symptoms in youth.
    METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-four participants (ages 12-15), balanced by sex assigned at birth, were selected from a sub-sample of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study based on hair toxicology and self-report measures of cannabis use. Participants positive for cannabinoids in hair and/or self-reported cannabis use were demographically matched to youth with no self-reported or confirmed cannabis use. The guardians of these youth reported depression symptoms on the Child Behavioral Checklist. Linear mixed effect models were run investigating cannabis use group on amygdala volumes bilaterally, controlling for whole brain volume and random effects of scanner type. Additional analyses examined cannabis group status and bilateral amygdala volume on depression symptoms.
    RESULTS: Cannabis use was not significantly associated with amygdala volume but was associated with increased depressive symptoms (p<0.01). Cannabis group interacted with amygdala volume, such that individuals with smaller volumes had increased depressive symptoms within the cannabis group (p\'s<0.01-0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Aberrations in amygdala volume based on cannabis use were not found in early adolescence; however, more depressive symptoms were related to cannabis group. Youth who use cannabis and have smaller amygdala volumes were at increased risk for depressive symptomology, suggesting potential neurovulnerabilities to cannabis use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本文采用系统评价来检验快感缺乏症与大麻使用之间的相关性,探索个体是否使用大麻作为应对机制,或者使用大麻是否在快感缺乏症的发作中起作用。搜索利用PubMed和WebofScience数据库,遵循PRISMA纸张选择指南。总共选择了21篇论文来解决这个问题,使用非随机暴露研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-E)工具进行评估。结果显示,17项研究表现出中等和低的偏倚风险。评估总共包括12427名参与者,包括动物和人类。实验动物研究的重点是探索大麻二酚(CBD)和快感缺乏之间的关联,虽然人类研究主要采用观察研究,检查患有或不患有抑郁症或精神病等精神障碍的个体的各种形式的快感缺乏症。这些研究还深入研究了了解青春期快感缺失的影响,并探索了这些概念之间的因果关系。研究结果表明,这是一种互惠而不是单向的关系,确定最初的快感缺乏症倾向于个人使用大麻,随后的消费显着加剧了快感缺乏症。特别是,这些研究特别强调青少年和患有精神障碍的个体。
    This paper employs a systematic review to examine the correlation between anhedonia and marijuana use, exploring whether individuals with anhedonia use marijuana as a coping mechanism or if marijuana use plays a role in the onset of anhedonia. The search utilised PubMed and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA guidelines for paper selection. A total of 21 papers were selected to address this inquiry, and assessments were carried out using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. The results revealed that 17 studies exhibited moderate and low risk of bias. The evaluation encompassed a total of 12,427 participants, including both animals and humans. Experimental animal studies focused on exploring the association between cannabidiol (CBD) and anhedonia, while human studies primarily employed observational research, examining various forms of anhedonia in individuals with or without mental disorders such as depression or psychosis. These studies also delved into understanding the effects of anhedonia during adolescence and explored the causal relationship between these concepts. The findings indicate a reciprocal rather than unidirectional relationship, establishing that initial anhedonia predisposes individuals to cannabis use, and subsequent consumption significantly intensifies the anhedonia experienced. Particularly, the studies placed special emphasis on adolescents and individuals with mental disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号