OBJECTIVE: A novel external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) might have analgesic effects on T6-10 and be indicated for laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, EOIB effects on postoperative pain are unknown. We aim to generate evidence to support such EOIB application. We will compare the efficacy of EOIB and wound infiltration (WI) in a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: We will assess plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine after EOIB, its pharmacokinetics, and the pinprick test in patients randomly assigned to receive EOIB or WI before laparoscopic or robot-assisted gastric distal or total gastrectomy. The EOIB and WI will start after general anesthesia induction with 20 and 40 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine per side, respectively, before skin closure. The outcomes will be numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 12 h postoperatively (primary) and postoperative NRS scores at 2, 24, and 48 h; fentanyl application; QoR-15 scores on postoperative days 1, 2, and 7; and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scores at 3 months (secondary).
CONCLUSIONS: We hope that our study will provide evidence to support EOIB application in laparoscopic surgery. Plasma concentrations will help determine levobupivacaine pharmacokinetics, which if similar to conventional nerve blocks, will indicate EOIB\'s safety.

Background Adjuvants have been discovered to prolong the analgesic impact of local anesthetics (LA), while the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block offers sufficient postoperative pain relief after various abdominal procedures. Nevertheless, the impact of the given LA will determine the duration of the TAP block. Thus, in this investigation, we aimed to estimate the analgesic impact of combining dexmedetomidine (DEX) with levobupivacaine in the TAP block for patients having an infraumbilical incision for an abdominal hysterectomy while under spinal anesthetic. Aim This study aimed to determine the analgesic effect of DEX (0.5 mcg/kg) to 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side in the TAP block in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Materials and methods Two groups of 30 patients each, with ASA grades 1 and 2, were randomly selected from patients. Group N, comprising 30 patients, had a bilateral TAP block using 2 mL of normal saline and 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine. Group D (n = 30 patients) was given DEX at a dose of 0.5 mcg/kg (2 mL) in addition to 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine given bilaterally. The TAP block was administered just after skin closure. Time of the initial analgesic dose administration; total fentanyl doses utilized as rescue analgesia; pain scores (numerical rating scale (NRS)) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours; and pre- and postoperative cortisol levels were also noted. For each group, 1 gram IV paracetamol was administered every eight hours. Drugs used for rescue analgesia (RA) were diclofenac 75 mg IV stat and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg. Results and discussion In addition to Group N having lower NRS scores at rest, Group D had a considerably longer time for initial rescue analgesia than Group N. There was also a significant decrease in the total fentanyl consumption and postoperative serum cortisol levels in Group D in contrast to Group N. Conclusion Potential adjuvant DEX prolongs postoperative analgesia in patients experiencing abdominal hysterectomy when used alongside LA in TAP.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic effect of a bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy using either a low-volume high-concentration (LV-HC) or a high-volume low-concentration (HV-LC) local anaesthetic solution.
METHODS: Retrospective observational equivalence trial.
METHODS: A total of 391 client-owned dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy.
METHODS: Dogs were assigned to group LV-HC or HV-LC depending on whether 0.2-0.25% levobupivacaine (0.4-0.5 mL kg-1) or 0.125-0.15% levobupivacaine (0.8-1 mL kg-1) was used to perform the ESPB, respectively. The number of dogs in which intraoperative rescue fentanyl boluses were administered, the total dose of fentanyl administered, the overall methadone consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively and anaesthetic complications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed considering p < 0.05 significant.
RESULTS: A total of 248 and 143 dogs were assigned to groups LV-HC and HV-LC, respectively. In group HV-LC, the number of dogs requiring fentanyl intraoperatively (64.3%) was higher (p = 0.0001) than that in group LV-HC (43.5%). The overall intraoperative fentanyl consumption was higher in group HV-LC between the first skin incision and the end of the lamina drilling (p = 0.028). According to the regression analysis, the group allocation was the best variable to predict the intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p < 0.001). Antimuscarinic drugs were administered more frequently in group LV-HC (p < 0.02). However, the prevalence of hypotension and other pharmacological cardiovascular interventions did not differ between groups. No differences in methadone consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively were found between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: When performing a bilateral ESPB in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy, compared with HV-LC, the use of LV-HC local anaesthetic solution reduces the intraoperative fentanyl consumption without affecting the postoperative methadone requirement.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that levobupivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine but carries a lower risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. This study explores whether levobupivacaine and bupivacaine are preferable for all patients, includ-ing those with comorbidities, particularly focusing on their effects on colonic anastomosis. The primary objective is to examine the influence of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on colonic anastomosis. Additionally, the study will assess their impact on wound healing and their anti-adhesive properties.
METHODS: Conducted between July 28, 2022, to August 4, 2022, at the Hamidiye Animal Experiments Laboratory, this study was approved by the University Science Health, Hamidiye Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee. This study was conducted using 21 male Sprague rats aged 16-20 weeks. The rats were allocated into three equal groups of seven each: Group C: pre-incisional isotonic; Group B: pre-incisional bupivacaine; and Group L: pre-incisional levobupivacaine. Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) were recorded during laparotomy and tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline levels measurement. Wound tensile strength along the middle incision line and anastomotic burst pressure were also assessed.
RESULTS: MAS was statistically significantly lower in Groups B and L compared to Group C (p<0.001). The wound histopathology score (WHS) was significantly higher in Group L than in Group B (p=0.021). Colon histopathology scores (CHSs) were also signifi-cantly higher in Group L compared to Group C (p=0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: TThe study found that bupivacaine and levobupivacaine did not significantly enhance wound healing, although le-vobupivacaine significantly improved WHS relative to bupivacaine. According to the findings of this study, levobupivacaine can enhance clinical practice by being used in patients undergoing colon anastomosis. It contributes significantly to the durability of colon anasto-mosis, has a more positive effect on wound healing compared to bupivacaine, and exhibits anti-adhesive properties. Additional clinical trials are necessary to validate these results further.

UNASSIGNED: In the postoperative period, open total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) surgeries induce considerable pain. Multimodal strategies are being used to alleviate pain.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for postoperative pain in TAH patients.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 72 patients with ASA grade I and grade II were randomly and equally assigned to two groups. After the completion of surgery with a subarachnoid block (SAB), patients in group 1 received a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 4 mg of dexamethasone on each side of the TAP block. Patients in group 2 received a mixture of 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine, with a total dose of 1 µg/kg body weight evenly distributed bilaterally in the TAP block. Patients were evaluated for pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), total tramadol consumption as rescue analgesia, time to first rescue analgesia, any adverse effects, and patient satisfaction.
UNASSIGNED: When comparing VAS scores for pain assessment, we observed that the mean VAS score was initially comparable between the two groups for the first hour. However, at 6, 9, and 12 h, VAS scores were significantly lower in group 2. The mean total tramadol consumption was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (213.33 ± 44.08 vs 161.11 ± 37.93 mg, P-value 0.027). The time to the first rescue analgesia after the TAP block in the postoperative period was significantly longer in group 2 (47.5 ± 62.76 vs 77.22 ± 56.14 min, P-value 0.002). No significant side effects were noted, and a greater proportion of patients in group 2 expressed satisfaction with their overall pain treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine is superior to the addition of dexamethasone, as it prolongs the duration of the block in the dexmedetomidine group. However, the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant is a good alternative option, particularly due to its lower cost and reduced incidence of adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting.

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil for bitches undergoing elective cesarean-section and the impact of these anesthetic protocols on neonatal viability. The anesthetic protocol consisted of intramuscular morphine (0.2 mg/kg), followed by an intravenous bolus of propofol, in a dose sufficient to allowed the puncture of the lumbosacral space. The dogs were randomly allocated to receive 0.5 % levobupivacaine plus fentanyl (2.5 µg/kg; LF: n = 9) or sufentanil (1 µg/kg; LS; n = 11). Maternal cardiorespiratory parameters were monitored at specific time points during surgery. Intraoperative propofol supplementation was based on the presence of head and/or thoracic limb movements. Neonatal reflex responses and the Apgar score (range 0-10 points) were assessed at 5 and 60 minutes after birth. Puppy mortality rate was recorded until 24 hours after birth. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey\'s test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Fisher\'s exact test (P < 0.05). Intraoperatively, maternal cardiorespiratory variables and propofol requirements were similar between groups, with no detection of anesthetic complications. The puppy reflex responses did not differ between groups at any time point. The medians (range) of Apgar scores were lower (P = 0.016) in the LF [5 (1-9)] at 5 minutes in comparison with LS [6 (2-9)], while no intergroup differences were recorded at 60 minutes [LF = 8 (2-10); LS = 9 (6-10]. The total mortality rate was 4.1 %. In the LS group, no puppies died, while in the LF 8 % of the puppies died in the first 24 hours after birth (P = 0.11). Epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil provided minimal maternal and neonatal adverse effects, but neither protocol enabled the performance of a C-section in 100 % of the French and English bulldogs, without propofol supplementation.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal epidural injections with steroids (TESI) are increasingly being used in patients sciatica. The STAR (steroids against radiculopathy)-trial aimed to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of TESI in patients with acute sciatica (< 8 weeks). This article contains the economic evaluation of the STAR-trial.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to one of three study arms: Usual Care (UC), that is oral pain medication with or without physiotherapy, n = 45); intervention group 1: UC and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) 1 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 1 ml of 40 mg/ml Methylprednisolone and intervention group 2: UC and transforaminal epidural injection (TEI) with 1 ml of 0,5% Levobupivacaine and 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl (n = 50). The primary effect measure was health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes were pain, functioning, and recovery. Costs were measured from a societal perspective, meaning that all costs were included, irrespective of who paid or benefited. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, and bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty.
RESULTS: None of the between-group differences in effects were statistically significant for any of the outcomes (QALY, back pain, leg pain, functioning, and global perceived effect) at the 26-weeks follow-up. The adjusted mean difference in total societal costs was €1718 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3020 to 6052) for comparison 1 (intervention group 1 versus usual care), €1640 (95%CI: - 3354 to 6106) for comparison 2 (intervention group 1 versus intervention group 2), and €770 (95%CI: - 3758 to 5702) for comparison 3 (intervention group 2 versus usual care). Except for the intervention costs, none of the aggregate and disaggregate cost differences were statistically significant. The maximum probability of all interventions being cost-effective compared to the control was low (< 0.7) for all effect measures.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adding TESI (or TEI) to usual care is not cost-effective compared to usual care in patients with acute sciatica (< 8 weeks) from a societal perspective in a Dutch healthcare setting.
BACKGROUND: Dutch National trial register: NTR4457 (March, 6th, 2014).

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied.
RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: la colecistectomía laparoscópica (CL), a pesar de su carácter mínimamente invasivo, requiere un control efectivo del dolor postoperatorio (POP). El uso de anestésicos locales (AL) ha sido estudiado pero el nivel de evidencia es bajo y existe poca información acerca de parámetros relevantes como la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) o la reincorporación laboral. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la eficacia de la infiltración de los sitios incisionales con levobupivacaína 0,50% en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio tras la CL.
UNASSIGNED: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Pacientes sometidos a CL programada fueron aleatorizados en dos grupos: sin infiltración (grupo control) y con infiltración preincisional (grupo intervención). La intensidad del dolor (escala de puntuación numérica, NRS), la necesidad de rescates con opioides, la incidencia de náuseas o vómitos postoperatorios (NVPO) y datos de CVRS o reincorporación laboral, entre otros, fueron recogidos.
RESULTS: 212 pacientes fueron aleatorizados y analizados: 105 en el grupo control y 107 en el grupo de intervención. Se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la intensidad del dolor (puntuación media NRS: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) y en la incidencia de NVPO (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: La infiltración con levobupivacaína es segura y efectiva en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio, aunque esto no conlleva una menor estancia hospitalaria y no influye en los resultados de CVRS, reincorporación laboral o satisfacción del paciente.

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is frequently administered to patient undergoing joint replacement surgical procedures. The aim of the present research was to verify the safety of collected shed blood to be reinfused postoperatively, by measuring levobupivacaine levels in drainage blood in patients undergoing LIA during knee replacement surgery.
METHODS: 24 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 12 scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) who received intraoperative LIA were considered. Blood samples were collected from shed blood which was present in drainage 2 and 5 hours after surgery and serum was analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: At 2 hours postoperatively, the median levobupivacaine serum concentration in the collected shed blood was 1.2 mg/L (SD: 4.2) for TKA and 17.13 mg/L (SD: 24.4) for THA. At 5 hours, levobupivacaine concentration was 1.84 mg/L (SD: 2.2) for TKA and 17.5 mg/L (SD: 25.2) for THA. Higher values of average serum levobupivacaine concentration were reported in drains collected from patients who had undergone THA compared to TKA (p<0.001). BMI significantly influenced levels of serum drug, that resulted to be higher in patients with BMI<25 (p= 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine from collected shed blood that would have been returned to the patient, was below toxicity level at 2 and 5 hours after LIA during total joint replacement. The average serum levobupivacaine concentration was found to be higher in drains taken from THA patients than TKA patients. Patients with lower BMI demonstrated the highest levels of levobupivacaine in shed blood and a lower blood volume needed for central nervous system toxicity. Therefore, in patients with a lower BMI undergoing THA, anaesthetic dosage should be reduced or autotransfusion should be avoided to prevent potential risks of toxicity.

Previous studies have compared levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine in various peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block duration, quality of analgesia, and onset time, but this has not occurred in the PENG block. Here, a single-center, randomized, and controlled clinical trial is presented. One hundred and twenty patients older than 65 years suffering from hip fractures and surgically treated at our institution under spinal anesthesia were eligible for participation; of them, one hundred and eight were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided PENG blocks using 20 mL of either 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine (both of which are equipotent concentrations). The primary endpoint was to compare the analgesic duration (time to first rescue) and analgesic quality (pain scores using the VAS, PAINAD, and AlgoPlus scales) between the groups. Secondary endpoints included comparing the onset time, describing the need for and type of rescue analgesics, and possible associated adverse effects. There were no statistically significant differences in analgesic duration between levobupivacaine (median 861.0, IQR 960) and ropivacaine (median 1205.0, IQR 1379; p = 0.069). Likewise, the quality of analgesia and onset time were comparable among the groups. A small number of patients required opioids as rescue analgesics (4.6%). The possible associated adverse effects included postoperative infection (11.1%) and delirium (2.8%).