目的:比较不同热消融与常规手术治疗甲状腺乳头状微小癌的疗效。使用包括传统池化和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的系统评价。
方法:在PubMed,EMBASE,CochraneLibrary数据库确定了评估不同热消融或常规手术后肿瘤体积变化的回顾性研究。包括从成立之日起至2024年1月6日的研究。对4463篇潜在论文的回顾,包括23篇全文综述,确定了10篇符合条件的论文,涵盖总共2658名患者,用于荟萃分析.在12个月的随访中,比较了不同热消融之间的肿瘤体积变化。肿瘤直径变化,并发症,复发,采用网络meta分析对手术和住院时间进行评价。
结果:基于传统的频率论方法,射频消融(RFA)肿瘤体积变化的标准化平均差(SMD)的总体汇总估计值,激光烧蚀(LA),微波消融(MWA)为1.38(95%可信区间(CI),0.62-2.13),1.94(95CI,0.78-3.10)和1.38(95CI,1.01-1.75),分别。基于贝叶斯网络元分析,在检查累积排名区域(SUCRA)排名下的表面时,RFA(SUCRA,76.6),MWA(SUCRA,66.6),和LA(SUCRA,39.8)被确定为与传统手术(CS)相比,与并发症风险降低最大相关的三种干预措施,使用RFA(SUCRA,76.6)被评为安全性最高的。MWA,SMD4.43[95CI,2.68-6.17],RFASMD4.24[95%CI,1.66-6.82],与CS相比,LASMD4.24[95%CI,1.48-7.00]与较短的手术时间有关。与CS相比,LASMD4.61[95%CI,1.79-7.44]和MWASMD3.07[95%CI,1.32-4.83]与住院时间较短相关,与LA(SUCRA,86.5)产量排名最高。MWA与肿瘤复发风险降低相关RR0.02[95%CI,-0.44-0.49],与CS相比。
结论:我们对已发表的关于不同热消融技术和常规手术治疗甲状腺乳头状微小癌的有效性和安全性的文献进行了全面回顾。由于缺乏长期数据和高质量的随机对照试验(RCTs),重要的研究差距仍然存在。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of different thermal ablation and conventional surgery for the treatment of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma, using a systematic review including traditional pooling and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases identified retrospective studies evaluating the tumor volume change after different thermal ablation or conventional surgery. Studies from the date of their inception to January 6, 2024, were included. A review of 4463 potential papers, including a full-text review of 23, identified 10 eligible papers covering a total of 2658 patients for meta-analysis. The tumor volume change over a 12-month follow-up was compared between different thermal ablations. Tumor diameter change, complications, recurrence, operation and hospitalization time were evaluated by network meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Based on the traditional frequentist approach, the overall pooled estimates for the standardized mean difference (SMD) in tumor volume change of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser ablation (LA), and microwave ablation (MWA) were 1.38 (95 % credibility interval (CI), 0.62-2.13), 1.94 (95%CI, 0.78-3.10) and 1.38 (95%CI, 1.01-1.75), respectively. Based on the Bayesian network meta-analysis, in examining the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) ranking, RFA (SUCRA, 76.6), MWA (SUCRA, 66.6), and LA (SUCRA, 39.8) were identified as the three interventions that were associated with the greatest reduction in risk for complications compared with conventional surgery (CS), with RFA (SUCRA, 76.6) being ranked as the highest in safety. MWA, SMD 4.43 [95%CI, 2.68-6.17], RFA SMD 4.24 [95 % CI, 1.66-6.82], and LA SMD 4.24 [95 % CI, 1.48-7.00] were associated with the shorter operation time compared with CS. LA SMD 4.61 [95 % CI, 1.79-7.44] and MWA SMD 3.07 [95 % CI, 1.32-4.83] were associated with the shorter hospitalization time compared with CS, with LA (SUCRA, 86.5) yielding the highest ranking. MWA was associated with a reduced risk for tumor recurrence RR 0.02 [95 % CI, -0.44-0.49], compared with CS.
CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature on the effectiveness and safety of different thermal ablation techniques and conventional surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Important research gaps persist due to a lack of long-term data and high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).