UNASSIGNED: Differentiation of iris and ciliary body lesions as benign or malignant and cystic or solid is important. The aim of this study was to compare anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (AS SS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) findings in iris and ciliary body tumors.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-two eyes of 38 cases with iris and ciliary body tumors imaged with UBM and AS SS-OCT between September 2018 and September 2023 were evaluated retrospectively.
UNASSIGNED: Of 42 eyes, 14 had melanoma, 14 iris pigment epithelial (IPE) cysts, 7 nevi, 3 Lisch nodules, 2 iris stromal cysts, 1 pars plana cysts, and 1 iris mammillations. An equivalent (100%) visualization of the anterior tumor margin was obtained with both techniques. Compared to AS SS-OCT, UBM was superior for posterior margin visualization in melanocytic tumors and IPE cysts. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement between UBM and AS SS-OCT for melanocytic tumors < 2.5 mm in base diameter and < 2 mm in thickness.
UNASSIGNED: Although, UBM is the gold standard for ciliary body and iridociliary tumors. AS SS-OCT should be considered as an excellent alternative to UBM, especially in minimally elevated iris lesions.

BACKGROUND: Ocular surface disorder after ocular radiation therapy, even though commonly reported, is often overlooked. Any delay in diagnosis may lead to complications that threaten vision. The presented case highlights the clinical outcome of a severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface, the importance of intensive therapy, and the limitations of further surgical interventions.
METHODS: A 34-year-old woman was referred for a second opinion due to a years-long history of pain and redness in her right eye (OD) after proton beam therapy for recurrent iris melanoma. The patient then developed post-radiation retinopathy with macula edema, secondary glaucoma, cataract, as well as a severe ocular surface disorder with corneal decompensation and band keratopathy. Several surgical treatments have been attempted, including phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Due to refractory glaucoma, Baerveldt glaucoma drainage was then necessary. Given the worsening clinical presentation of post-radiation ocular surface disorder with progressing band keratopathy, the possibility of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuous worsening of clinical symptoms of the disorder of the ocular surface after proton beam radiotherapy can be the result of a post-radiation syndrome. Gradual expansion of ischemia, vasculitis, and inflammatory mediators compresses the retinal tissue, leading to recurrent macular edema as well as to secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation. Band keratopathy is occasionally noted and seems to result from severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface. However, PKP would typically be indicated in cases of corneal perforation, uncontrolled infectious keratitis, or for improving vision in the presence of corneal opacification, none of which applied to our patient. Furthermore, post-radiation keratopathy implies compromised corneal stromal lymphogenesis and angiogenesis, both of which are now considered essential conditions for allograft rejection. Moreover, a previously performed Baerveldt glaucoma drainage surgery can affect the survival rate of the endothelial cells of the recipient cornea. Therefore, a penetrating or endothelial keratoplasty should be viewed as a high-risk procedure. In this instance, the rigorous treatment of the severe ocular surface disorder was crucial. We managed our patient\'s complex situation by following the latest guidelines set by the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society and aimed to alleviate the symptoms as effectively as possible. In conclusion, careful decision-making regarding surgical treatment options should be considered, taking into account the complexities and potential risks involved.
Eine 34-jährige Frau wurde wegen Schmerzen und Rötungen am rechten Auge seit Jahren überwiesen. Ihre Krankengeschichte ergab eine Exzision eines Irismelanoms im Alter von 29 Jahren. Aufgrund eines Rezidivs wurde daraufhin eine Protonenstrahlentherapie durchgeführt. Infolgedessen entwickelte die Patientin nach der Strahlentherapie eine Retinopathie mit Makulaödem, sekundärem Glaukom, Katarakt sowie einer schweren Störung der Augenoberfläche mit Hornhautdekompensation und einer Bandkeratopathie. Es wurden mehrere chirurgische Eingriffe unternommen, darunter die Phakoemulsifikation mit IOL-Implantation und die Trabekulektomie mit Mitomycin C. Aufgrund des refraktären Glaukoms war schließlich auch eine Baerveldt-Implantation erforderlich. Trotz vielfältiger therapeutischer Ansätzen zur Befeuchtung zeigte sich keine Verbesserung des Problems der Augenoberfläche. Aufgrund der Verschlechterung der klinischen Präsentation der Augenoberflächenstörung wurde die Möglichkeit einer perforierenden Keratoplastik in Betracht gezogen. Es bleibt jedoch fraglich, ob solche Patienten von einer perforierenden Keratoplastik profitieren würden, da die resultierende Lymph- und Hämangiogenese des Hornhautstromas wesentliche Risikofaktoren für die Abstoßung von Fremdgewebe darstellen.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated high levels of tissue contrast, accuracy and reproducibility in evaluating posterior uveal melanoma. Owing to smaller size, the role of MRI in detecting and characterising iris melanoma has not yet been explored.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a protocol to image iris melanoma and describe the MRI characteristics of histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma.
METHODS: An optimised MRI protocol, using a 3T MRI scanner and a 32-channel head coil, was developed to image iris tumours. A prospective, single-centre, 12-month study was conducted on all patients with lesions suspicious for iris melanoma. All patients were offered an MRI scan in addition to the standardised clinical procedures. Image quality comparison was made with existing clinical investigations. Iris melanoma characteristics on MRI are described.
RESULTS: A successful optimised MRI scan protocol was developed that was able to detect and characterise iris melanoma. One normal participant and five patients with subsequent histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma (n = 6) were recruited. Four patients completed the full MRI sequence. All iris melanoma were detected on at least one T1- or T2-weighted images. When compared to the vitreous, all iris melanomas demonstrated hyper-intensity on T1-weighted images and hypo-intensity on T2-weighted images. On T1-mapping, T1-values of iris melanoma demonstrated an inverse relationship with the degree of tumour pigmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights an optimised, easily reproducible MRI scan protocol to image iris melanoma. Numerous MR imaging characteristics of iris melanoma are reported for the first time and a potential non-invasive tumour biomarker is described.

OBJECTIVE: To examine complications, visual outcomes, photic patient-reported symptoms, corneal morphology, IOL tilt, and intraocular pressure after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) and iris prosthesis (IP) following iridocyclectomy.
METHODS: Patients with previous iridocyclectomy treated with an IOL and IP at the Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet between 2007 and 2018 were included in this national retrospective non-comparative case series. The assessment encompassed BCVA, PRO questionnaire, corneal topography, and anterior segment OCT.
RESULTS: 45 patients were included. Eight of 45 patients were previously treated with ruthenium-106 brachytherapy in conjunction with iridocyclectomy. Six of 45 patients developed endothelial dysfunction four of whom had received ruthenium-106 brachytherapy. Five of 45 patients had subluxation of the IOL/IP complex due to incomplete zonula apparatus. BCVA improved for all patients after lens surgery. 26 patients participated in the invited follow-up examination. 19 of 26 (73%) reported none or mild photic symptoms after IP instalment. Five (19%) reported ongoing severe photic symptoms. The corneal astigmatism significantly increased after iridocyclectomy but did not change after lens surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an IOL and IP is a safe procedure, alleviating photic symptoms in most patients. It comes with higher risk of complications due to a more demanding procedure and larger surgical traumas from previous treatments. Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy increases the complication risk. Corneal astigmatism is induced by iridocyclectomy but does not change after lens surgery.

Surgical placement of eye plaque brachytherapy (EPB) is the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanomas, including iris/iridociliary melanomas. However, unique challenges exist in anterior EPB placement. Here, we describe a surgical technique for anterior EPB placement when placement requires plaque positioning onto the cornea. Blunt conjunctival peritomy exposes the sclera overlying the tumor. A \"dummy\" plaque is placed, with positioning confirmed by direct visualization. The amniotic membrane is draped across the cornea and anchored with the eyelet sutures, the plaque is placed overlying the membrane, the conjunctiva is closed over the plaque, and a temporary tarsorrhaphy is performed. One week later, the conjunctival incision is reopened for plaque/amniotic membrane removal. This technique was employed in the treatment of 12 iris/iridociliary melanomas at our institution, with no instances of corneal damage. In placing an anterior plaque, employing this technique allows appropriate cancer treatment while optimizing patient comfort and corneal integrity.

Primary uveal melanoma is rare and affects approximately 8,000 persons per year worldwide. This malignancy can involve the iris, ciliary body, and choroid. Of these three structures, the iris is the least commonly affected site, representing only 4% of all uveal melanomas. Iris melanoma can arise from iris melanocytic nevus, iris melanocytosis, or de novo. In a longitudinal study of 1,611 patients with iris nevus, transformation into melanoma, using Kaplan-Meier estimates, was found in 2.6% by five years and in 4.1% by 10 years. The factors that predicted growth of iris melanocytic nevus into melanoma are denoted by a letter (ABCDEF) guide: A for age ≤40 years old at presentation (hazard ratio [HR] = 3, P = .01), B for blood (hyphema) (HR = 9, P < .0004), C for clock hour of tumor inferiorly (tumor location) (HR = 9, P = .03), D for diffuse flat tumor configuration (HR = 14, P = .02), E for ectropion uveae (HR = 4, P = .002), and F for feathery ill-defined margins (HR = 3, P = .02). At diagnosis, iris melanoma has a mean cross-sectional diameter of 5.5 mm and thickness of 2.1 mm, often with tumor seeding (28%) and secondary glaucoma (35%). We provide a comprehensive review of iris nevus and melanoma to explore relevant demographic and clinical data, risk factors for tumor growth, management, and prognosis, with the hope that clinicians will be more comfortable in understanding this rare malignant condition.

暂无摘要。

Uveal melanoma prognostication studies have mainly included posterior uveal melanomas located in the ciliary body and choroid, often excluding iris melanoma. In this study, we report prognostic status and survival outcomes in a series of 35 patients with biopsy-proven iris melanoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in 10 (29%) cases and 2 (5%) underwent multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. In total, 9 cases demonstrated disomy 3, 2 cases with monosomy 3 (fluorescence in situ hybridization), and 1 had a technical failure. On gene expression profile testing, 20 of the 23 cases (90%) were gene expression profile class 1A, and the remaining 3 (10%) were class 1B. No patient had a Class 2 status. The median follow-up period was 49 months (mean 59, range 2-156 months). No metastasis was reported during follow-up, and metastasis-free survival was 100%. A review of the published literature revealed 47 cases with high-risk status on molecular prediction, of which only 6 (13%) developed metastasis. Ciliary body involvement was reported in 5 cases and was unknown in 2 cases. We conclude that molecular prognostication of iris melanoma demonstrates low-risk prognostic status in the majority of cases irrespective of the technique used. Even those with high-risk status do not develop metastasis unless the tumor involves the ciliary body.

Melanoma isolated to the iris is rare and can present with a distorted pupil. This is a case report of an 81-year-old asymptomatic man, who had a large pigmented element in his left iris through 30 years. Because of involvement of the angle the tumour was excised with the ciliary body, and histopathologic examination revealed an iris melanoma. The aim of this report is to underscore the clinical signs of an iris melanoma and when surgery is needed.

This study evaluated the functional outcome and ocular side effects of patients receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) for the treatment of iris melanoma (IM).
This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data.
Patients with IM who underwent PBR as a primary treatment.
Treatment was given in the form of whole PBR (wPBR: n = 51) or segmental PBR (sPBR: n = 98).
Visual acuity (VA) and side effects were divided into ocular surface disease (OSD), secondary glaucoma, or cataract development.
A total of 149 eyes of 149 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 16.0 years were included. Tumor recurrence developed in 3 patients (wPBR: 1/51; sPBR: 2/98). Ocular surface disease was observed in 78.4% of the wPBR group (40/51) and 25.5% of the sPBR group (25/98) (P < 0.001) after 0.7 ± 1.2 years and 1.1 ± 0.9 years, respectively. The main side effect was dry eye syndrome in both groups, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure were found only in the wPBR group (4/51; 7.8%). Secondary glaucoma developed in 31.4% of the wPBR group (16/51) compared with 1.0% in the sPBR group (1/98; P < 0.001). Glaucoma control was generally achieved with eye drops, whereas surgery was necessary in 5 patients (wPBR: 4/51, 7.8%; sPBR: 1/98, 1%). Cataract surgery was performed in 47.9% of the wPBR group (23/48) and 19.8% of the sPBR group (19/96) (P < 0.001). Before treatment, VA was 0.14 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the wPBR group and 0.04 ± 0.19 logMAR in the sPBR group. A worsening was seen in the wPBR group (0.55 ± 0.16 logMAR; P < 0.001) 6 months after radiotherapy, which normalized after 12 months (0.15 ± 0.30 logMAR; P = 0.17). In the sPBR group, no such decrease in VA was observed (6 months: 0.03 ± 0.22 logMAR, P = 0.54; 12 months: 0.04 ± 0.21 logMAR, P = 0.98).
Our results demonstrate that PBR is a very successful treatment option for patients with IM, showing a high tumor control rate and relatively low complication profile. Tumor recurrence was a rare event, and secondary enucleation was not necessary in any patient. Side effects are commonly seen, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure or secondary glaucoma mainly developed after wPBR. These results are important for clinical decision making and discussion with the patient regarding this form of radiotherapy.
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.