BACKGROUND: Ocular surface disorder after ocular radiation therapy, even though commonly reported, is often overlooked. Any delay in diagnosis may lead to complications that threaten vision. The presented case highlights the clinical outcome of a severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface, the importance of intensive therapy, and the limitations of further surgical interventions.
METHODS: A 34-year-old woman was referred for a second opinion due to a years-long history of pain and redness in her right eye (OD) after proton beam therapy for recurrent iris melanoma. The patient then developed post-radiation retinopathy with macula edema, secondary glaucoma, cataract, as well as a severe ocular surface disorder with corneal decompensation and band keratopathy. Several surgical treatments have been attempted, including phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Due to refractory glaucoma, Baerveldt glaucoma drainage was then necessary. Given the worsening clinical presentation of post-radiation ocular surface disorder with progressing band keratopathy, the possibility of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuous worsening of clinical symptoms of the disorder of the ocular surface after proton beam radiotherapy can be the result of a post-radiation syndrome. Gradual expansion of ischemia, vasculitis, and inflammatory mediators compresses the retinal tissue, leading to recurrent macular edema as well as to secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation. Band keratopathy is occasionally noted and seems to result from severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface. However, PKP would typically be indicated in cases of corneal perforation, uncontrolled infectious keratitis, or for improving vision in the presence of corneal opacification, none of which applied to our patient. Furthermore, post-radiation keratopathy implies compromised corneal stromal lymphogenesis and angiogenesis, both of which are now considered essential conditions for allograft rejection. Moreover, a previously performed Baerveldt glaucoma drainage surgery can affect the survival rate of the endothelial cells of the recipient cornea. Therefore, a penetrating or endothelial keratoplasty should be viewed as a high-risk procedure. In this instance, the rigorous treatment of the severe ocular surface disorder was crucial. We managed our patient\'s complex situation by following the latest guidelines set by the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society and aimed to alleviate the symptoms as effectively as possible. In conclusion, careful decision-making regarding surgical treatment options should be considered, taking into account the complexities and potential risks involved.
Eine 34-jährige Frau wurde wegen Schmerzen und Rötungen am rechten Auge seit Jahren überwiesen. Ihre Krankengeschichte ergab eine Exzision eines Irismelanoms im Alter von 29 Jahren. Aufgrund eines Rezidivs wurde daraufhin eine Protonenstrahlentherapie durchgeführt. Infolgedessen entwickelte die Patientin nach der Strahlentherapie eine Retinopathie mit Makulaödem, sekundärem Glaukom, Katarakt sowie einer schweren Störung der Augenoberfläche mit Hornhautdekompensation und einer Bandkeratopathie. Es wurden mehrere chirurgische Eingriffe unternommen, darunter die Phakoemulsifikation mit IOL-Implantation und die Trabekulektomie mit Mitomycin C. Aufgrund des refraktären Glaukoms war schließlich auch eine Baerveldt-Implantation erforderlich. Trotz vielfältiger therapeutischer Ansätzen zur Befeuchtung zeigte sich keine Verbesserung des Problems der Augenoberfläche. Aufgrund der Verschlechterung der klinischen Präsentation der Augenoberflächenstörung wurde die Möglichkeit einer perforierenden Keratoplastik in Betracht gezogen. Es bleibt jedoch fraglich, ob solche Patienten von einer perforierenden Keratoplastik profitieren würden, da die resultierende Lymph- und Hämangiogenese des Hornhautstromas wesentliche Risikofaktoren für die Abstoßung von Fremdgewebe darstellen.

OBJECTIVE: To examine complications, visual outcomes, photic patient-reported symptoms, corneal morphology, IOL tilt, and intraocular pressure after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) and iris prosthesis (IP) following iridocyclectomy.
METHODS: Patients with previous iridocyclectomy treated with an IOL and IP at the Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet between 2007 and 2018 were included in this national retrospective non-comparative case series. The assessment encompassed BCVA, PRO questionnaire, corneal topography, and anterior segment OCT.
RESULTS: 45 patients were included. Eight of 45 patients were previously treated with ruthenium-106 brachytherapy in conjunction with iridocyclectomy. Six of 45 patients developed endothelial dysfunction four of whom had received ruthenium-106 brachytherapy. Five of 45 patients had subluxation of the IOL/IP complex due to incomplete zonula apparatus. BCVA improved for all patients after lens surgery. 26 patients participated in the invited follow-up examination. 19 of 26 (73%) reported none or mild photic symptoms after IP instalment. Five (19%) reported ongoing severe photic symptoms. The corneal astigmatism significantly increased after iridocyclectomy but did not change after lens surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an IOL and IP is a safe procedure, alleviating photic symptoms in most patients. It comes with higher risk of complications due to a more demanding procedure and larger surgical traumas from previous treatments. Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy increases the complication risk. Corneal astigmatism is induced by iridocyclectomy but does not change after lens surgery.

Iris melanoma and iris nevi can be challenging to distinguish clinically. This case series provides unique insight into the rare condition and variable clinical presentations of iris melanoma.
This study aimed to highlight the varying clinical presentations of iris melanoma and to demonstrate the overlapping features of melanoma and nevi.
This case series includes five patients of varying age and sex who presented to clinic with pigmented iris lesions. These five patients have differing timeline to presentation and very different clinical presentations of their lesions. Clinical evaluation was based around the established \"ABDCEF\" guide for the assessment of malignant risk in iris lesions. The presentation of each lesion is discussed in relation to this guide and the experienced clinician\'s clinical suspicion of malignancy. When comparing the clinical suspicion with histological analysis, after biopsy, the result may be unexpected. Notably, initially benign nevi may transform into melanoma over time. These five cases were managed on an individual basis because the management and prognosis of iris melanomas vary significantly. Importantly, iris melanotic lesions have variable metastatic risk based on cytology and genetic predisposition. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients, institutional approval was obtained, and no identifiable health information is included in this case series.
When presented with a pigmented iris lesion, clinicians must be vigilant with regular monitoring and have a low threshold for biopsy in pigmented lesions of high clinical suspicion.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic thyroid tissue in the iris, also known as a thyroid glandular epithelial choristoma of the iris, has only been described twice in the literature. In both cases it remained asymptomatic.
METHODS: A 67-year-old female patient presented for the first time in mid-2017 with corneal endothelial decompensation, with a history of complicated cataract surgery and IStent® implantation. Slit lamp microscopy showed endothelial decompensation, pseudophakia, anterior synechiae and a whitish iris tumour adhering to the endothelium. The latter had existed since childhood. Given these findings, reduced visual acuity of hand movement perception and an intraocular pressure of 23 mmHg, we performed a keratoplasty combined with an en bloc resection of the iris tumour at 9 o\'clock and sector iridectomy at the end of 2019. Histological and immunohistological examination of the iris tumour unexpectedly revealed thyroid tissue. After the procedure described above, the patient had an increase in visual acuity while the graft stayed clear and the eye showed no evidence of tumour recurrence or other complications.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a third case of ectopic thyroid tissue in the iris. Both previous cases remained asymptomatic, whereas in our case, size and location of the ectopic thyroid tissue contributed to a more complex cataract surgery resulting in endothelial decompensation. Therefore, in such cases appropriate patient information should be provided prior to cataract surgery. Furthermore, careful histological examination and examination of the thyroid is important to exclude malignant diagnoses such as a metastasis of a follicular thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis of neoplasms to the eye is quite uncommon. In this case report, we describe a patient where primary esophageal cancer was diagnosed by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of an iris tumor.
METHODS: A 70-year-old male complained of redness and discomfort in the right eye.
METHODS: The patient\'s right eye was diagnosed as idiopathic uveitis, and a topical steroid was administered. As vitreous opacities were observed even after topical therapy, oral prednisolone was administered. On slit-lamp examination of the right eye, an iris mass with neovascularization was seen in the anterior chamber. A metastatic tumor was suspected, and FNAB was performed. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Systemic workup revealed esophageal cancer with several metastases. Best-corrected visual acuity decreased to 20/400, and intraocular pressure was 40 mmHg in the right eye. Two iris tumors with neovascularization were present extending into the anterior chamber with posterior iris synechiae and 360 degree peripheral anterior synechiae. Intraocular pressure in the right eye was medically managed with hypotensive eye drops and oral acetazolamide. Iris metastases were treated with 40 Gray of radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The tumor regressed, but intraocular pressure was refractory to treatment because of 360 degree goniosynechial closure. The right eye lost light perception six months after treatment commenced, and the patient died 9 months after the onset of therapy due to multiple systemic metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a rare case of masquerade syndrome without systemic symptoms in which FNAB of an iris tumor led to a diagnosis of metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Although the patient lost his sight due to uncontrollable ocular hypertension, systemic chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were initially effective in the treatment of the metastatic iris tumor. As the prognosis of patients with metastatic iris tumors is poor, it is important for ophthalmologists to consider such diagnoses and conduct systemic investigations when necessary.

CONCLUSIONS: Iris tumors are rare conditions, and there is a relative paucity of recent published data on its broad clinical spectrum. Tapioca iris melanoma is a rarer yet devastating form with wide and challenging differential diagnoses because of its amelanotic nodular appearance.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the challenging presentation of an uncommon iris melanoma, describing the clinical and histological findings and comparing them with the existing published data.
METHODS: An uncommon clinicopathological report on the tumor unusual localization, patient age, absence of elevated IOP and heterochromia, and negative S-100 stain that caused diagnostic uncertainty is presented. The patient remains free of metastatic disease 7 years after a complete tumor full-thickness excision.
CONCLUSIONS: Tapioca iris melanomas are uncommon tumors with a presentation/surgical management that differs from other malignant tumors. Ophthalmologists should consider it among the vast differential diagnoses when observing amelanotic lesions, even without the hallmark signs being evident.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic iris tumors are relatively rare entities that are often treated with radiation therapy; however, it remains difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) provides high-resolution cross-sectional images with no dye injection, and may thus be useful for evaluating iris tumors. Herein, we report a case of metastatic iris tumor examined with AS-OCT before and after radiation therapy.
METHODS: A 56-year-old Japanese woman complained of ocular hyperemia and pain in her right eye, and was referred to our hospital because of uveitis and an iris mass. One year before the initial visit, the patient was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma, and treated with chemotherapy. She also underwent radiation therapy 4 months ago due to multiple bone metastases. Slit-lamp microscopy revealed a 2×2 mm elevated lesion with partial depigmentation on the lower iris. AS-OCT examination revealed that the mass was located in the iris stroma with an irregular anterior surface. Based on fine needle aspiration cytology, she was diagnosed with metastatic iris tumor derived from lung adenocarcinoma, leading to local radiotherapy. Seven months later, AS-OCT showed shrinkage and atrophy of the iris tumor with peripheral anterior synechia formation.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of cytology-proven metastatic iris tumor observed with AS-OCT before and after radiation therapy. This study highlights the potential usefulness of AS-OCT for monitoring changes in tumor size and configuration following radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In cases of suspected intraocular malignancy, vitreous may be the preferred pathologic sample; however, cellularity may be insufficient for definitive cytopathological diagnosis. Ancillary methodology to study vitreous fluid aspiration for mutational analysis may assist in treatment decisions.
METHODS: Three individual patient vitreous humor samples were received in the laboratory for mutation testing. The samples were collected during standard of care and analyzed for routine cytopathology. In each case, cytopathology was inconclusive and mutational analyses to support diagnostic suspicions were clinically requested. Based on the clinically and pathologically suspected diagnoses, an appropriate massively parallel sequencing assay previously validated for clinical use was performed using DNA extracted from vitreous samples that had previously undergone various processing. Nucleic acid yield was assessed by fluorometric or spectrophotometric methods, with yield ranging from 2.7 to 86.5 ng. Library preparations were performed using standard laboratory protocols.
RESULTS: Two of the cases were suspicious for melanoma and a 50-gene solid tumor panel was performed. The third case was worrisome for vitreoretinal lymphoma and a 49-gene myeloid panel was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, the molecular profiling assisted with the clinical assessment and/or management of each patient.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of a patient with iris metastasis as the initial manifestation of a systemic cancer: upper gastrointestinal tract carcinoma.
METHODS: A 24-year-old Asian man presented to our hospital with complaints of red left eye, decreased visual acuity, pain, and photophobia for about 3 weeks with no prior history of cancer or any other medical abnormality. Ocular examination showed a pinkish white lesion on the superonasal part of the iris. The patient\'s intraocular pressure was progressively increasing despite medications, followed by lymphadenopathy 4 weeks later. Comprehensive examination was performed along with a complete systemic workup, which detected systemic malignancy. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry revealed signet ring cells, which indicated an upper gastrointestinal tract tumor as a primary source of iris metastasis. The systemic condition of the patient deteriorated rapidly thereafter and led to his death in the 12th week of the disease.
CONCLUSIONS: A red eye with iris lesions in otherwise healthy individuals should be considered as a possible initial manifestation of underlying systemic malignancy. Prompt referral of such patients to an oncologist is warranted.

A 71-year-old woman presented with spontaneous microhyphema in her left eye, causing blurry vision. Bleeding stopped spontaneously shortly after several cycles of digital compression on the upper eyelid, (which were documented in video), and therefore, did not require laser photocoagulation, a possible approach previously explained to the patient. A microhemangioma at the edge of the iris was identified to be the cause of the condition. The hemorrhage did not recur during the follow-up period (9 months).