Interobserver variability

观察者间的可变性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大约,据报道,55%的乳腺癌是HER-2低乳腺癌。曲妥珠单抗-Deruxtecan是一种新的FDA批准的靶向治疗HER-2低转移性乳腺癌,因此,必须尽一切努力在提交病理检查的标本中识别这些肿瘤。由于标本采购的便利性,细胞学标本通常是此评估的第一个也是唯一的方式。这项研究旨在使用转移部位的细胞学标本确定观察者之间HER-2免疫染色解释的变异性。
    方法:进行病理数据库检索,以确定在细胞学标本中报告的转移性乳腺癌。然后进行手动搜索以识别HER-2低类别的病例,共检索了50例H&E细胞块和HER-2neu免疫染色载玻片。1号和2号审稿人独立解释所有50例的HER-2免疫染色。只有不和谐的病例被送交审核员-3解释。这三个人都被转移部位蒙蔽了眼睛,和原始的HER-2解释。
    结果:50例,11例(22%)报告为1号审阅者和2号审阅者之间的一致评分,但原始IHC报告不一致。此外,4例(8%)在1号审阅者和2号审阅者之间的HER2IHC染色报告不一致,总共15例(30%),总体结果不一致。
    结论:本研究强调了HER-2低类型乳腺癌的HER-2免疫染色解释的观察者间差异。我们建议需要更强大的实验室技术,包括用于统一鉴定这些独特的可靶向转移性乳腺癌组的分子。
    BACKGROUND: Approximately, 55% of breast carcinomas are reported to be HER-2 low breast carcinomas. Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan is a new FDA-approved targeted therapy for HER-2 low metastatic breast carcinomas, making it essential that all efforts are made to identify these tumors in specimens submitted for pathologic examination. Cytology specimens are often the first and only modality of this assessment due to the ease of specimen procurement. This study aimed to determine the variability in HER-2 immunostaining interpretation among observers using cytologic specimens from metastatic sites.
    METHODS: A pathology database search was made to identify metastatic breast carcinoma reported in cytology specimens. A manual search was then done to identify cases of HER-2 low category, H&E cell block and HER-2 neu immunostain slides were retrieved for a total of 50 cases. Reviewer #1 and #2 independently interpreted HER-2 immunostain of all 50 cases. Only discordant cases were sent for reviewer-3 interpretation. All three were blinded by the metastatic site, and original HER-2 interpretation.
    RESULTS: Of 50 cases, 11 cases (22%) were reported as concordant scores between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 but had a discordant original IHC report. Additionally, 4 cases (8%) had discordant reporting of HER2 IHC stain between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 making a total of 15 cases (30%) with overall discordant results.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the interobserver variability of HER-2 immunostain interpretation for HER-2 low category of breast carcinomas. We recommend the need for more robust laboratory techniques including molecular for uniform identification of these unique targetable metastatic breast carcinoma groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在通过对病理学家的调查了解口腔上皮异型增生(OED)分级中观察者间差异的原因,为改善OED诊断的可靠性和可重复性提供见解。
    方法:研究设计包括定量和定性方法。一份预先验证的31项问卷分发给了一般,头部和颈部,以及世界各地的口腔和颌面部组织病理学专家。
    结果:共有132名病理学家参与并完成了问卷。超过三分之二的人使用了OED的三层分级系统,而大约三分之一的人同时使用二进制和三层系统。OED的常规记者更喜欢三层系统和分级建筑功能。继续教育大大有助于认识到建筑和细胞学的变化。不规则的上皮分层和滴状网状脊具有最低的预后价值和识别评分。而上皮细胞凝聚力的损失最高。大多数参与者使用临床信息,并在对OED进行分级时经常寻求第二意见。
    结论:我们的研究发现,OED报告的频率和CME/CPD的出席在OED分级中起重要作用。个体组织学特征的预后价值变化和临床信息的使用可能进一步导致观察者间的变异性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand reasons for interobserver variability in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) through a survey of pathologists to provide insight for improvements in the reliability and reproducibility of OED diagnoses.
    METHODS: The study design included quantitative and qualitative methodology. A pre-validated 31-item questionnaire was distributed to general, head and neck, and oral and maxillofacial histopathology specialists worldwide.
    RESULTS: A total of 132 pathologists participated and completed the questionnaire. Over two-thirds used the three-tier grading system for OED, while about a third used both binary and three-tier systems. Regular reporters of OED preferred the three-tier system and grading architectural features. Continuing education significantly aided recognition of architectural and cytological changes. Irregular epithelial stratification and drop-shaped rete ridges had the lowest prognostic value and recognition scores, while loss of epithelial cell cohesion had the highest. Most participants used clinical information and often sought a second opinion when grading OED.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study has found that frequency of OED reporting and attendance of CME/CPD can play an important role in grading OED. Variations in the prognostic value of individual histological features and the use of clinical information may further contribute to interobserver variability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)的分级是有争议的,并没有被普遍接受。肿瘤出芽(TB)的组织形态学特征是结直肠癌中已确立的独立预后因素,其重要性在其他实体癌中越来越重要。使其成为纳入肿瘤分级计划的候选人。我们旨在比较肺鳞状细胞癌的术前活检和切除标本之间的TB,并评估观察者之间的变异性。在伯尔尼(2000-2013年,N=136)和洛桑(2005-2020年N=113)接受LUSC切除的249例连续患者的回顾性队列中,分析了可用的术前活检的结核病和其他组织形态学参数,例如通过气道传播(STAS)和组织增生由两名专家病理学家。结果与临床病理参数和生存率相关。在切除标本中,肿瘤周围出芽(PTB)评分较低(0-4芽/0.785mm2),占47.6%,中间(5-9芽/0.785mm2)为27.4%,和高(≥10芽/0.785mm2)在25%的情况下(中位芽计数=5,IQR=0-26)。当比较肿瘤边缘和肿瘤内区时,芽的绝对数量和TB评分相似(p=0.192),但与活检中获得的评分显着不同(p<0.001)。观察者间的变异性中等,无论分数位置(科恩的卡帕0.59)。对不一致的案件进行了重新评估,在所有案件中都达成了共识,并确定了不一致的原因。TB评分与分期显著相关(p=0.002),淋巴结(p=0.033)和远处转移(p=0.020)的存在,与总生存率无显著相关性,肿瘤大小或胸膜侵犯。组织增生与较高的PTB显著相关(p<0.001)。STAS占34%,与较低的PTB相关(p<0.001)。最后,尽管在LUSC中证实了TB是一个可重复的因素,但我们发现了评分模糊的领域.术前活检评估不足以确定切除肿瘤的最终肿瘤出芽评分。
    Grading lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is controversial and not universally accepted. The histomorphological feature of tumor budding (TB) is an established independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and its importance is growing in other solid cancers, making it a candidate for inclusion in tumor grading schemes. We aimed to compare TB between preoperative biopsies and resection specimens in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and assess interobserver variability. A retrospective cohort of 249 consecutive patients primarily resected with LUSC in Bern (2000-2013, N=136) and Lausanne (2005-2020 N=113) with available preoperative biopsies was analyzed for TB and additional histomorphological parameters such as spread through airspaces (STAS) and desmoplasia by two expert pathologists. Results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival. In resection specimens, peritumoral budding (PTB) score was low (0-4 buds/0.785 mm2) in 47.6%, intermediate (5-9 buds/0.785 mm2) in 27.4 %, and high (≥10 buds/0.785 mm2) in 25 % of cases (median bud count = 5, IQR = 0 - 26). Both the absolute number of buds and TB score were similar when comparing tumor edge and intratumoral zone (p=0.192) but significantly different from the score obtained in the biopsy (p<0.001). Interobserver variability was moderate, regardless of score location (Cohen\'s kappa 0.59). The discrepant cases were reassessed, and consensus was reached in all cases with identification of causes of discordance. TB score was significantly associated with stage (p=0.002), presence of lymph node (p=0.033) and distant metastases (p=0.020), without significant correlation with overall survival, tumor size or pleural invasion. Desmoplasia was significantly associated with higher PTB (p<0.001). STAS was present in 34% and associated with lower PTB (p<0.001). To conclude, despite confirming TB as a reproductible factor in LUSC we disclose areas of scoring ambiguity. Preoperative biopsy evaluation was insufficient in establishing the final tumor budding score of the resected tumor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    准确测量男孩的睾丸体积(TV)是临床实践中的重要工具,例如,精索静脉曲张治疗。这项研究旨在评估睾丸体积测量的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性程度。在一项前瞻性研究中,纳入11~17岁无睾丸病理的男孩.睾丸超声由三名研究人员进行(A:儿科放射科医师;B:儿科外科/泌尿科住院医师;C:儿科泌尿科医师)。研究者B和C中的观察者间变异性和所有三个研究者之间的观察者间变异性进行计算。共有30名男孩入学。两名观察者的平均观察者内变异性为0.3%,范围为-39.6至51.5%。差异>20%的测量的比例为18.6%。平均观察者间变异性为-1.0%(范围:-74.1%至62.8%)。差异>20%的测量的总比例为35%。在两个观察者组中,<4mL的睾丸大小显示出>20%的差异(31.1%与14.4%;p=0.035)和观察者组(63.2%vs.26.2%;p=0.000031)。此外,在两个观察者中,与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者的差异>20%的比率显着降低(2.8%与22.4%;p=0.0084)和观察者组(24%vs.40.8%,p=0.0427)。青春期男孩基于超声的电视测量中的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性都包含相关的不确定性程度,这使他们不适合进行个性化的后续护理。在队列级别,然而,基于超声的电视测量结果的平均差异很低,足以使超声比较合理。
    Accurate measurement of testicular volume (TV) in boys is an important tool in clinical practice, e.g., in varicocele treatment. This study aims to assess the degree of intra- and interobserver variability of testicular volume measurements. In a prospective study, boys between 11 and 17 years of age without testicular pathology were enrolled. Testicular ultrasound was performed by three investigators (A: pediatric radiologist; B: pediatric surgery/urology resident; C: pediatric urologist). Intraobserver variability was calculated in investigators B and C and interobserver variability between all three investigators. A total of 30 boys were enrolled. Mean intraobserver variability in both observers was +0.3% with a range of -39.6 to 51.5%. The proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 18.6%. The mean interobserver variability was -1.0% (range: -74.1% to 62.8%). The overall proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 35%. A lower testicular size of < 4 mL showed a significantly higher rate of >20% difference in both the intraobserver group (31.1% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.035) and the interobserver group (63.2% vs. 26.2%; p = 0.000031). Furthermore, the rate of >20% difference was significantly lower in obese compared to non-obese patients in both the intraobserver (2.8% vs. 22.4%; p = 0.0084) and the interobserver group (24% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.0427). Both intraobserver and interobserver variability in ultrasound-based TV measurements in pubertal boys contain a relevant degree of uncertainty that renders them unsuitable for individualized follow-up care. At the cohort level, however, mean differences in ultrasound-based TV measurements are low enough to make ultrasound comparisons reasonable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)观察者间变异的主题,包括对主要来源的讨论,缓解方法,和未来的方向。
    方法:PI-RADS观察者间变异性的叙述性综述。
    结果:PI-RADS于2012年开发,旨在为前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)设定技术标准,在解释时减少观察者间的变异性,并提高MRI定向诊断途径的诊断准确性,以检测临床上有意义的前列腺癌。虽然PI-RADS已在前列腺癌成像专家的选定研究队列中得到验证,随后在常规临床实践中进行的前瞻性研究表明,在诊断性能方面存在很大差异.放射科医师和活检操作者的经验是在多个相互关联的因素中,包括MRI硬件和技术的可变性,图像质量,以及人群和患者特定因素,如前列腺癌疾病患病率。PI-RADS的迭代改进有助于使新手读者的曲线变平并减少变异性。图像质量报告方面的创新,行政和组织工作流程,和人工智能有望进一步改善可变性。
    结论:需要对PI-RADS进行持续研究,以促进基准创建,读者认证,和独立认证,这是在整个人群中维持和维持高质量前列腺MRI所需的系统级干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the topic of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) interobserver variability, including a discussion of major sources, mitigation approaches, and future directions.
    METHODS: A narrative review of PI-RADS interobserver variability.
    RESULTS: PI-RADS was developed in 2012 to set technical standards for prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reduce interobserver variability at interpretation, and improve diagnostic accuracy in the MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. While PI-RADS has been validated in selected research cohorts with prostate cancer imaging experts, subsequent prospective studies in routine clinical practice demonstrate wide variability in diagnostic performance. Radiologist and biopsy operator experience are the most important contributing drivers of high-quality care among multiple interrelated factors including variability in MRI hardware and technique, image quality, and population and patient-specific factors such as prostate cancer disease prevalence. Iterative improvements in PI-RADS have helped flatten the curve for novice readers and reduce variability. Innovations in image quality reporting, administrative and organisational workflows, and artificial intelligence hold promise in improving variability even further.
    CONCLUSIONS: Continued research into PI-RADS is needed to facilitate benchmark creation, reader certification, and independent accreditation, which are systems-level interventions needed to uphold and maintain high-quality prostate MRI across entire populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期Barrett癌可以通过内镜切除治疗。切除技术的选择,然而,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)或黏膜下剥离术(ESD)在很大程度上取决于内镜医师判断的假定浸润深度.然而,内镜诊断癌症浸润程度的准确性尚不清楚。
    方法:来自202例早期Barrett食道癌患者(82%为男性,平均年龄66.9岁)从我们的内窥镜检查数据库中选择(T1a期为73.3%,T1b期为26.7%).向9名巴雷特食管专家展示了图像,与患者临床数据(年龄,性别,Barrett食管长度)和活检结果。专家被要求预测渗透深度(T1b与T1a),并建议适当的内窥镜切除技术(EMR或ESD,或手术)。还确定了这些参数的观察者间变异性(κ值)。
    结果:诊断T1b与T1a浸润的总体阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为40.7%(95%CI:36.7,44.8)和79.8%(95%CI:77.5,81.9)。卡伯值分别为0.41。巴黎分类(kappa0.51)和建议的治疗方法在专家之间也有所不同。在事后分析中,只有根据巴黎分类(IIB;所有病例的25%)分类为不可见或平坦的病变与建议的切除技术之间的相关性更好:在这个亚组中,在>80%的病例中建议使用EMR,具有较高的完全(基础R0)切除率(平均88.1%)。
    结论:专家对Barrett食管癌粘膜和粘膜下受累的精确内镜区分作为选择切除技术的依据具有有限的预测价值和高度的观察者间差异。似乎主要是不可见/扁平的病变可能导致良好的切除结果时,通过EMR治疗,但这种分层策略必须在进一步的研究中进行评估.
    BACKGROUND: Early Barrett cancer can be curatively treated by endoscopic resection. The choice of the resection technique, however-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD)-largely depends on the assumed infiltration depth as judged by the endoscopist. However, the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the degree of cancer infiltration is not known.
    METHODS: Three to four high-quality images (both in overview and close-up) from 202 of early Barrett esophagus cancer cases (82% men, mean age 66.9 years) were selected from our endoscopy database (73.3% stage T1a and 26.7% in stage T1b). Images were shown to 9 Barrett esophagus experts, with patients\' clinical data (age, sex, Barrett esophagus length) and biopsy results. The experts were asked to predict infiltration depth (T1b vs. T1a), and to suggest the appropriate endoscopic resection technique (EMR or ESD, or surgery). Interobserver variability (kappa values) was also determined for these parameters.
    RESULTS: Overall positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to diagnose T1b versus T1a infiltration were 40.7% (95% CI: 36.7, 44.8) and 79.8% (95% CI: 77.5, 81.9), respectively; kappa value was 0.41. Paris classification (kappa 0.51) and suggested treatment also varied between experts. In a post hoc analysis, only the correlation between lesions classified as invisible or flat according to the Paris classification (IIB; 25% of all cases) and the suggested resection technique was better: In this subgroup, EMR was recommended in >80% of cases, with a high complete (basal R0) resection rate (mean of 88.1%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Precise endoscopic distinction between mucosal and submucosal involvement of Barrett esophagus cancer by experts as a basis for choosing the resection technique has limited predictive values and high interobserver variability. It seems that mainly invisible/flat lesions may result in good resection outcomes when treated by EMR, but this stratification strategy has to be assessed in further studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    客观评估人工智能(AI)工具(AIATELLA,版本1.0;AIATELLAOy,赫尔辛基,芬兰)通过与三位国家卫生服务(NHS)心脏病专家的准确性和效率进行比较,来解释心脏磁共振(CMR)成像以产生主动脉根部和瓣膜的测量值。方法在英国东北部的三个不同地点,记录了三名经验丰富的NHS顾问心脏病学家(CC)的人工测量结果,同时记录了AI衍生的主动脉根部和瓣膜测量结果。这项研究利用了一个全面的CMR图像数据集,组内相关系数(ICC)是AI和心脏病专家评估之间一致性的主要指标。患者成像是匿名的,并且在传输到安全数据服务器时是盲的。结果该研究表明,与NHS心脏病专家进行的主动脉根部和瓣膜的AI评估之间的一致性很高(ICC为0.98)。值得注意的是,AI在2.6秒内(+/-0.532)交付结果,而心脏病专家的平均值为334.5秒(+/-61.9),在不影响准确性的情况下,效率的统计显着提高。结论AI的准确性和分析速度表明它可能是心脏诊断的有价值的工具。解决耗时和可变的基于临床医生的评估的挑战。这项研究加强了AI在优化患者旅程和提高诊断途径效率方面的作用。
    Objective Evaluating an artificial intelligence (AI) tool (AIATELLA, version 1.0; AIATELLA Oy, Helsinki, Finland) in interpreting cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging to produce measurements of the aortic root and valve by comparison of accuracy and efficiency with that of three National Health Service (NHS) cardiologists. Methods AI-derived aortic root and valve measurements were recorded alongside manual measurements from three experienced NHS consultant cardiologists (CCs) over three separate sites in the northeast part of the United Kingdom. The study utilised a comprehensive dataset of CMR images, with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) being the primary measure of concordance between the AI and the cardiologist assessments. Patient imaging was anonymised and blinded at the point of transfer to a secure data server.  Results The study demonstrates a high level of concordance between AI assessment of the aortic root and valve with NHS cardiologists (ICC of 0.98). Notably, the AI delivered results in 2.6 seconds (+/- 0.532) compared to a mean of 334.5 seconds (+/- 61.9) by the cardiologists, a statistically significant improvement in efficiency without compromising accuracy. Conclusion AI\'s accuracy and speed of analysis suggest that it could be a valuable tool in cardiac diagnostics, addressing the challenges of time-consuming and variable clinician-based assessments. This research reinforces AI\'s role in optimising the patient journey and improving the efficiency of the diagnostic pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在磁共振成像引导的在线自适应放射治疗(MRgOART)过程中产生的轮廓差异会影响剂量分布。这项研究评估了使用MRgOART治疗的胰腺癌患者在描绘危险器官(OAR)时的观察者间错误。此外,我们通过评估多名患者的OAR可视化,探讨了抑制蠕动的药物在抑制分数内运动方面的有效性.
    本研究招募了3名接受MRgOART治疗的胰腺癌患者。根据MRI序列和丁基东莨菪碱给药(Buscopan)将研究队列分为三种情况:1,不使用丁基东莨菪碱的T2成像;2,使用丁基东莨菪碱的T2成像;和3,使用丁基东莨菪碱的多对比成像。四名失明的观察者可视化了OAR(胃,十二指肠,小肠,和大肠)在初始和最终MRgOART会话期间采集的MR图像上。在计划目标体积周围±2cm的切片区域上描绘轮廓。骰子相似系数(DSC)用于评估轮廓。此外,在MRgOART期间在轮廓描绘过程前后采集的两幅MR图像上对OAR进行可视化,以评估蠕动是否可以被抑制.计算每个OAR的DSC。
    OAR中的观察者间错误(胃,十二指肠,小肠,三种情况的大肠)分别为0.636、0.418、0.676和0.806;0.725、0.635、0.762和0.821;以及0.841、0.677、0.762和0.807。与没有丁基东莨菪碱的所有条件相比,DSC均较高。除了在MR图像的最后一个阶段中观察到的情况2中的胃。OAR的DSC(胃,十二指肠,小肠,大肠)在轮廓检查前后分别为0.86、0.78、0.88和0.87;0.97、0.94、0.90和0.94;条件1、2和3分别为0.94、0.86、0.89和0.91。
    丁基东莨菪碱在MRgOART治疗期间有效地减少了观察者间的误差和分数内的运动。
    UNASSIGNED: Differences in the contours created during magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgOART) affect dose distribution. This study evaluated the interobserver error in delineating the organs at risk (OARs) in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with MRgOART. Moreover, we explored the effectiveness of drugs that could suppress peristalsis in restraining intra-fractional motion by evaluating OAR visualization in multiple patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study enrolled three patients who underwent MRgOART for pancreatic cancer. The study cohort was classified into three conditions based on the MRI sequence and butylscopolamine administration (Buscopan): 1, T2 imaging without butylscopolamine administration; 2, T2 imaging with butylscopolamine administration; and 3, multi-contrast imaging with butylscopolamine administration. Four blinded observers visualized the OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, and large intestine) on MR images acquired during the initial and final MRgOART sessions. The contour was delineated on a slice area of ±2 cm surrounding the planning target volume. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the contour. Moreover, the OARs were visualized on both MR images acquired before and after the contour delineation process during MRgOART to evaluate whether peristalsis could be suppressed. The DSC was calculated for each OAR.
    UNASSIGNED: Interobserver errors in the OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine) for the three conditions were 0.636, 0.418, 0.676, and 0.806; 0.725, 0.635, 0.762, and 0.821; and 0.841, 0.677, 0.762, and 0.807, respectively. The DSC was higher in all conditions with butylscopolamine administration compared with those without it, except for the stomach in condition 2, as observed in the last session of MR image. The DSCs for OARs (stomach, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine) extracted before and after contouring were 0.86, 0.78, 0.88, and 0.87; 0.97, 0.94, 0.90, and 0.94; and 0.94, 0.86, 0.89, and 0.91 for conditions 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Butylscopolamine effectively reduced interobserver error and intra-fractional motion during the MRgOART treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    促生长素抑制素受体2型(SSTR2)的过表达是各种肿瘤类型的特性。利用[68Ga]1,4,7,10-四氮杂环十二烷-1,4,7,10-四乙酸(DOTA)的混合成像可以改善肿瘤和健康组织之间的分化。我们对47例匿名患者进行了实验研究,其中包括30例脑膜瘤,12PitNET和5SBPGL。指示四名独立观察者在计划MRI时绘制宏观肿瘤体积的轮廓,然后使用DOTA-PET/CT的其他信息重新评估其体积。评估了观察者和参考卷之间的一致性。总的来说,46例(97.9%)是DOTA-狂热,并包括在最终分析中。在八个案例中,PET/CT识别出MRI未检测到的额外肿瘤体积;这些PET/CT发现对于4例患者的治疗计划可能至关重要。对于脑膜瘤,PET/CT的观察者和观察者对参考体积的一致性指数较高。对于PitNET,MRI观察者之间的体积一致性较高.关于SBGDL,未观察到与添加PET/CT信息相符的显著趋势.DOTAPET/CT支持脑膜瘤和PitNET中的准确肿瘤识别,并建议在计划使用高度适形放射治疗的表达SSTR2的肿瘤中使用。
    The overexpression of somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) is a property of various tumor types. Hybrid imaging utilizing [68Ga]1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA) may improve the differentiation between tumor and healthy tissue. We conducted an experimental study on 47 anonymized patient cases including 30 meningiomas, 12 PitNET and 5 SBPGL. Four independent observers were instructed to contour the macroscopic tumor volume on planning MRI and then reassess their volumes with the additional information from DOTA-PET/CT. The conformity between observers and reference volumes was assessed. In total, 46 cases (97.9%) were DOTA-avid and included in the final analysis. In eight cases, PET/CT additional tumor volume was identified that was not detected by MRI; these PET/CT findings were potentially critical for the treatment plan in four cases. For meningiomas, the interobserver and observer to reference volume conformity indices were higher with PET/CT. For PitNET, the volumes had higher conformity between observers with MRI. With regard to SBGDL, no significant trend towards conformity with the addition of PET/CT information was observed. DOTA PET/CT supports accurate tumor recognition in meningioma and PitNET and is recommended in SSTR2-expressing tumors planned for treatment with highly conformal radiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号