Inpatient

住院患者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:1.为了探索医生的看法,注册护士(RN)和专职医疗专业人员(AHP)对基于病房的高级实践护士(APN)的作用。2.检查医疗保健专业人员对APN在住院护理中角色扩展的看法。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:从2022年11月至2023年2月,在三级医院的五个医疗病房中,对医疗保健专业人员对基于病房的APN的看法进行了包括五个领域的43项调查。参与者是通过电子邮件和跨平台消息传递服务使用便利抽样招募的。
    结果:共有181名完成的受访者,包括26名医生,102名护士和45名AHP。用IBMSPSS版本28.0进行统计分析。人们认为APN在所有五个领域都花费了大量的时间,即,“直接全面护理”,\'系统支持\',\'研究\',\'教育\'和\'出版和专业领导\'。根据APN的先前经验以及不同的医疗保健专业之间的看法存在显着差异。大多数人认识到APN对患者安全的积极影响,效率和以患者为中心。
    结论:这项研究为基于病房的APN实践模式提供了有价值的见解,角色和影响,揭示了他们在住院普通病房中接受和扩大角色的积极转变。它还强调了基于病房的APN在直接患者护理中的重要作用和影响,系统支持,研究,教育和领导,尽管角色清晰度方面存在挑战,特别是在治疗计划和查房方面。
    APNs在病房中被认为是称职且始终如一的人员。然而,关于APNs开展的临床活动存在分歧。
    研究解决了什么问题?○基于病房的APN的角色歧义。○医疗保健专业人员对APN的准备和接受。主要发现是什么?○APN被认为对直接患者护理有很大的参与,系统的支持,研究,教育和领导。○APN因其对患者安全的重大影响而得到认可,效率和以病人为中心,但是对他们在不同实践领域花费的时间有不同的看法。○强调了APN参与每日病房和启动出院计划的关键作用,强调它们在护理的及时性和连续性方面的重要性。研究将在何处以及对谁产生影响?○它将影响包括医生在内的医疗保健专业人员,护士,通过提供对病房APN的作用和贡献的见解,专职医疗专业人员和医疗保健管理员。○调查结果将指导政策制定者和护士领导者做出关于APN角色的实施和发展的知情决定,最终改善患者护理和结果。
    没有患者或公共捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: 1. To explore the perceptions of physicians, registered nurses (RN) and allied health professionals (AHP) towards the role of ward-based advanced practice nurse (APN). 2. To examine healthcare professionals\' perception of APN role expansion in inpatient care.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: A 43-item survey comprising of five domains was conducted on healthcare professionals\' perceptions towards ward-based APNs in five medical wards of a tertiary hospital from November 2022 to February 2023. The participants were recruited using convenience sampling via email and cross-platform messaging service.
    RESULTS: A total of 181 completed respondents including 26 physicians, 102 nurses and 45 AHPs. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Version 28.0. APNs were perceived to be spending a great extent of time across all five domains, namely, \'direct comprehensive care\', \'support of systems\', \'research\', \'education\' and \'publication and professional leadership\'. Significant differences were noted in perceptions based on prior experience with APNs and between different healthcare professions. The majority recognized APNs\' positive impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient-centeredness.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study offers valuable insights into ward-based APNs\' practice patterns, roles and impact, revealing a positive shift in their acceptance and expanding roles within inpatient general wards. It also highlights the valuable roles and impact of ward-based APNs in direct patient care, system support, research, education and leadership, despite ongoing challenges in role clarity, particularly in treatment planning and ward rounds.
    UNASSIGNED: APNs are highly regarded as competent and a consistent personnel in the wards. However, there are divided views on clinical activities that APNs undertake.
    UNASSIGNED: What problem did the study address? ○ Role ambiguity for ward-based APNs. ○ Healthcare professionals\' readiness and acceptance of APNs. What were the main findings? ○ APNs are perceived to have a strong involvement in direct patient care, support of system, research, education and leadership. ○ APNs are recognized for their significant impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient-centredness, but there were varied perceptions on the extent of time they spend in different practice domains. ○ The critical roles of APNs participating in daily ward rounds and initiating discharge plans were highlighted, emphasizing their importance in timeliness and continuity of care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○ It will affect healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals and healthcare administrators by providing insights into the roles and contributions of ward-based APNs. ○ The findings will guide policymakers and nurse leaders in making informed decisions about the implementation and development of APN roles, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: No Patient or Public Contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知障碍在AUD患者中很常见,并使成瘾管理的预后恶化。没有明确的指南来筛查AUD住院患者的认知障碍。
    方法:纳入57例有AUD病史的患者,这些患者被送进了急性医院,并由成瘾护理小组进行了评估。使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试对这些患者进行认知障碍筛查。我们收集了有关成瘾史的临床信息,合并症,和目前的治疗方法。卡方检验,t检验,进行Mann-Whitney测试以确定与病理性MoCA评分(<26)相关的因素。
    结果:病理性MoCA评分与时空定向障碍呈正相关,很难回忆起成瘾史,患者漏报AUD和上次饮酒日期低于11天前,与酒精相关的健康问题导致住院的原因呈负相关。没有药物治疗与认知障碍相关。
    结论:成瘾护理小组评估的临床要素允许筛查认知障碍的相关指征。
    BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments are common in patients with AUD and worsen the prognosis of addiction management. There are no clear guidelines for screening cognitive impairments in hospitalized patients with AUD.
    METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with an AUD history who were admitted to an acute hospital and assessed by the addiction care team were included. Those patients were screened for cognitive impairments using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. We collected clinical information regarding addiction history, comorbidities, and current treatments. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to determine factors associated with a pathological MoCA score (<26).
    RESULTS: A pathological MoCA score was positively associated with spatial-temporal disorientation, difficulty in recalling addiction history, patient underreporting of AUD and a date of last alcohol consumption lower than 11 days ago, and negatively associated with a reason for hospitalization due to alcohol-related health issues. No medication was associated with cognitive impairments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical elements from assessment by the addiction care team allow for relevant indication for screening cognitive impairments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神病认知行为疗法(CBTp)是一种针对精神病患者的心理治疗方法,可在急性期开始。然而,在急性精神健康住院患者中应如何实施CBTp尚未达成共识.这项研究旨在就如何在这种情况下提供CBTp获得治疗师的共识。从该领域专家治疗师的角度,进行了两阶段的Delphi研究,以就住院CBTp的核心组成部分达成共识。45名治疗师参加了两轮关于参与和反馈领域的评级声明,评估和模型,配方,改变策略,家庭作业,原则和价值观。最终包括114份声明,≥80%的受访者将其评为重要或重要。住院患者CBTp的交付取决于对传统CBTp的几种适应,包括间接工作,在会话内容和交付方面更加灵活,适应限制性环境。这些建议可以为培训提供信息,能力框架,以及在住院环境中提供CBTp。
    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is a psychological therapy recommended for people with psychosis which can start in the acute phase. However, there is not consensus on how CBTp should be delivered in an acute mental health inpatient setting. This study aimed to gain consensus from therapists on how CBTp should be delivered in this context. A 2-stage Delphi study was conducted to establish consensus on what the core components are of inpatient CBTp from the perspective of therapists who are experts in the field. Forty-five therapists took part in 2 rounds of rating statements on the areas of engagement and feedback, assessment and model, formulation, change strategies, homework, and principles and values. A final list of 114 statements were included, which were rated as essential or important by ≥80% of respondents. The delivery of inpatient CBTp is dependent on several adaptations to traditional CBTp including indirect work, being more flexible with session content and delivery, and making adaptations to the restrictive environment. These recommendations could inform training, competency frameworks, and delivery of CBTp in inpatient settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:饮食失调是影响个体的复杂困难,他们的支持者和社会。越来越多的人被接受强化治疗(例如,住院治疗,日间治疗或急性医学治疗)。在强化治疗期间帮助和阻碍饮食失调恢复的生活经验观点是一个新兴的兴趣领域。这篇综述旨在探讨患者在这些情况下帮助和阻碍康复的观点。
    方法:进行了系统评价,以确定使用定性方法探索患者对进食障碍进行强化治疗的经验的研究。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)清单评估文章质量,并使用主题综合来分析主要研究并制定总体分析主题。
    结果:30篇文章符合纳入标准,纳入本综述。方法质量大多较好。专题综合产生了六个主要主题;协作护理支持康复;安全和恐怖的环境;谈判身份;支持身心;需要专家支持;以及亲密他人的价值。所包括的文章主要集中在专科住院护理上,来自八个不同的国家。一个明显的局限性是30项研究中有22项没有报告种族数据。当报告种族数据时,参与者主要被确定为白人。
    结论:这篇综述指出,以人为本,在饮食失调治疗的所有阶段,生物心理社会方法都是必要的,在资源充足且训练有素的多学科团队的支持下。改善身体健康仍然是饮食失调恢复的基础,尽管心理支持对于理解和维持饮食失调的原因以及促进从饮食失调为主的身份转变也是必不可少的。灌输希望并提供同理心和验证的照顾者和同伴是宝贵的其他支持来源。未来的研究应该探索什么最适合谁,为什么,在强化治疗期间评估患者和照顾者集中的心理干预和饮食支持。未来的研究还应该探索的长期影响,有时,强制性和痛苦的治疗实践,并确定如何减轻潜在的医源性伤害。
    一些饮食失调的人需要强化治疗(例如,住院治疗,日间治疗或急性医学治疗)在其病程中。了解在强化治疗期间有助于和阻碍饮食失调恢复的因素是制定有效干预措施的重要组成部分。这篇综述总结了探索饮食失调患者强化治疗观点的研究,目的是确定什么有助于和阻碍饮食失调的恢复。我们在科学数据库中搜索了所有已发表的定性研究,这些研究探讨了饮食失调患者对强化治疗的看法。30项研究符合本文献综述的纳入标准。通过提取与进食障碍恢复有关的相关发现来分析这些研究的结果部分。我们发现以人为本,整体方法在饮食失调治疗的所有阶段都是必要的,在医疗保健专业人员和护理人员的支持下,他们掌握了如何支持饮食失调患者的专业知识。改善身体健康是恢复饮食失调的基础。然而,心理支持对于帮助饮食失调患者了解原因和维持饮食失调并支持他们摆脱饮食失调主导的身份也至关重要。概述了未来研究的领域。
    BACKGROUND: Eating disorders are complex difficulties that impact the individual, their supporters and society. Increasing numbers are being admitted to intensive treatment settings (e.g., for inpatient treatment, day-patient treatment or acute medical treatment). The lived experience perspectives of what helps and hinders eating disorder recovery during intensive treatment is an emerging area of interest. This review aims to explore patients\' perspectives of what helps and hinders recovery in these contexts.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies using qualitative methods to explore patients\' experiences of intensive treatment for an eating disorder. Article quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklist and thematic synthesis was used to analyse the primary research and develop overarching analytical themes.
    RESULTS: Thirty articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The methodological quality was mostly good. Thematic synthesis generated six main themes; collaborative care supports recovery; a safe and terrifying environment; negotiating identity; supporting mind and body; the need for specialist support; and the value of close others. The included articles focused predominantly on specialist inpatient care and were from eight different countries. One clear limitation was that ethnicity data were not reported in 22 out of the 30 studies. When ethnicity data were reported, participants predominantly identified as white.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review identifies that a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach is necessary throughout all stages of eating disorder treatment, with support from a sufficiently resourced and adequately trained multidisciplinary team. Improving physical health remains fundamental to eating disorder recovery, though psychological support is also essential to understand what causes and maintains the eating disorder and to facilitate a shift away from an eating disorder dominated identity. Carers and peers who instil hope and offer empathy and validation are valuable additional sources of support. Future research should explore what works best for whom and why, evaluating patient and carer focused psychological interventions and dietetic support during intensive treatment. Future research should also explore the long-term effects of, at times, coercive and distressing treatment practices and determine how to mitigate against potential iatrogenic harm.
    Some people with eating disorders will need intensive treatment (e.g., inpatient treatment, day-patient treatment or acute medical treatment) during the course of their illness. Understanding what helps and hinders eating disorder recovery during intensive treatment is an important part of developing effective interventions. This review summarises research exploring people with eating disorders’ perspectives of intensive treatment, with the aim of identifying what helps and hinders eating disorder recovery. We searched in scientific databases for all published qualitative studies that explored people with eating disorders’ perspectives of intensive treatment. Thirty studies meet the inclusion criteria of this literature review. The results sections of these studies were analysed by extracting relevant findings relating to eating disorder recovery. We found that a person-centred, holistic approach is necessary throughout all stages of eating disorder treatment, with support from healthcare professionals and carers with specialist knowledge of how to support people with eating disorders. Improving physical health is fundamental to eating disorder recovery. However, psychological support is also essential to help people with eating disorders to understand what causes and maintains the eating disorder and support them to move away from an eating disorder dominated identity. Areas for future research are outlined.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高钾血症与住院时间延长和死亡率恶化有关。高钾血症也可能需要临床咨询,治疗高钾血症和高依赖性床利用。我们评估了住院患者高钾血症的“隐藏”人力和组织资源利用率。这是一个单一的中心,观察性队列研究(2017年1月至2020年12月),在一家三级医院进行。CogStack系统(数据处理和分析平台)用于从单个患者记录中搜索非结构化和结构化数据。使用三次样条回归对钾和死亡之间的关系进行建模,根据年龄调整,性别,和合并症。Cox比例风险估计了与正常钾血症(3.5-5.0mmol/l)相比的死亡风险。129,172名患者在急诊科进行了钾测量。高钾血症的发病率为85.7/1000。有49,011例紧急入院。钾>6.5mmol/L的住院死亡率比正常钾血症低3.9倍。慢性肾脏疾病的发生率为21%,钾含量为5-5.5mmol/L,钾含量为54%,钾含量>6.5mmol/L。对于糖尿病,它是20%和32%,分别。那些钾>6.5mmol/L,29%的人有肾病检查,和13%的重症监护审查;在该组中,22%转移到肾脏病房,8%转移到重症监护病房。在峰值钾>6.5mmol/L的患者中,有39%使用透析。入院高钾血症和低钾血症与出院可能性降低独立相关。高钾血症与更高的住院死亡率和降低的出院可能性相关。它需要大量利用肾脏病学和重症监护咨询,并有更大的可能性将患者转移到肾脏和重症监护。
    Hyperkalaemia is associated with prolonged hospital admission and worse mortality. Hyperkalaemia may also necessitate clinical consults, therapies for hyperkalaemia and high-dependency bed utilisation. We evaluated the \'hidden\' human and organisational resource utilisation for hyperkalaemia in hospitalised patients. This was a single-centre, observational cohort study (Jan 2017-Dec 2020) at a tertiary-care hospital. The CogStack system (data processing and analytics platform) was used to search unstructured and structured data from individual patient records. Association between potassium and death was modelled using cubic spline regression, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards estimated the hazard of death compared with normokalaemia (3.5-5.0 mmol/l). 129,172 patients had potassium measurements in the emergency department. Incidence of hyperkalaemia was 85.7 per 1000. There were 49,011 emergency admissions. Potassium > 6.5 mmol/L had 3.9-fold worse in-hospital mortality than normokalaemia. Chronic kidney disease was present in 21% with potassium 5-5.5 mmol/L and 54% with potassium > 6.5 mmol/L. For diabetes, it was 20% and 32%, respectively. Of those with potassium > 6.5 mmol/L, 29% had nephrology review, and 13% critical care review; in this group 22% transferred to renal wards and 8% to the critical care unit. Dialysis was used in 39% of those with peak potassium > 6.5 mmol/L. Admission hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia were independently associated with reduced likelihood of hospital discharge. Hyperkalaemia is associated with greater in-hospital mortality and reduced likelihood of hospital discharge. It necessitated significant utilisation of nephrology and critical care consultations and greater likelihood of patient transfer to renal and critical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对精神病院建筑和设计效果的评估主要集中在最终结果上,如疾病进展,是从循证医学的角度出发的。同时,有证据的人,现实主义的方法解决了干预是如何工作的。需要了解干预措施的基本作用机制,以促进其在新环境中的扩大和适应。这篇综述报告了体系结构和设计对住院精神病医院的患者和工作人员体验的影响。搜索围绕三个关键概念(精神病医院,设计,以及工作人员和患者的结果),并在三个参考数据库(Embase,Medline,和心理信息)。对学术文献和灰色文献进行了分析。关于精神病院设计和建筑特点的资料,它们对患者和工作人员体验的影响,并提取了实现这些效果的作用机制。从951个原始参考文献中,分析中包括14个全文。设计和建筑特征(例如,地方的审美情趣,家庭环境)在精神病医院解决患者的压力,促进社交互动,培养病人的自主性和控制感,确保尊重患者的隐私和尊严,并防止刺激不足和过度。采用理论驱动的评价方法可以促进未来医院的改造和效果评价。
    The evaluation of the effects of architecture and design in psychiatric hospitals primarily focuses on final outcomes, such as disease progression, and is made from the perspective of evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile, the evidence-informed, realist approach addresses how the intervention works. Understanding the underlying action mechanisms of the intervention is needed to facilitate its scaling-up and adaptation in new environments. This umbrella review reports in which ways architecture and design have an effect on patients\' and staff experience in inpatient psychiatric hospital. The search was constructed around three key concepts (psychiatric hospital, design, and staff and patient outcomes) and was conducted across three reference databases (Embase, Medline, and PsychINFO). Academic and gray literature was analyzed. Information on design and architectural features in psychiatric hospitals, their effects on patients and staff experience, and the acting mechanisms enabling these effects were extracted. From 951 original references, 14 full texts were included in the analysis. Design and architectural features (e.g., aesthetic appeal of places, home-like environment) in psychiatric hospitals address patients\' stress, boost social interaction, foster patients\' autonomy and feelings of control, ensure respect for patient\'s privacy and dignity, and prevent under-and overstimulation. Using theory-driven evaluation may facilitate future hospital renovation and the evaluation of its effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:连续血糖监测(CGM)可改善门诊血糖转归;然而,关于医院CGM准确性的数据有限。
    方法:我们进行了前瞻性,观察性研究将DexcomG6Pro传感器的CGM数据与参与者住院期间的护理参考点和实验室血糖测量结果进行比较.关键准确性指标包括CGM值在参考葡萄糖值>5.6mmol/l的±20%以内或在参考葡萄糖值≤5.6mmol/l(%20/20)的±1.1mmol/l以内的比例,CGM和参考值之间的平均和中位数绝对相对差异(MARD和中位数ARD,分别)和克拉克误差网格分析(CEGA)。使用回顾性校准方案来确定校准是否提高了传感器精度。多变量回归模型和亚组分析用于确定临床特征对准确性评估的影响。
    结果:共有326名成年人在19个内科或非外科重症监护医院楼层住院,提供6648个匹配的葡萄糖对。%20/20为59.5%,MARD为19.2%,ARD中位数为16.8%.CEGA显示98.2%的值在区域A(临床准确)和区域B(良性)。准确性指标较低的亚组包括重度贫血患者,肾功能不全和水肿。每天一次的早晨校准计划的应用提高了准确性(MARD11.4%)。
    结论:在医院使用时的CGM准确性可能低于在门诊环境中报告的CGM准确性,但这可以通过适当的患者选择和每日校准来改善。需要进一步的研究来了解CGM在住院患者中的作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycaemic outcomes in the outpatient setting; however, there are limited data regarding CGM accuracy in hospital.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study comparing CGM data from blinded Dexcom G6 Pro sensors with reference point of care and laboratory glucose measurements during participants\' hospitalisations. Key accuracy metrics included the proportion of CGM values within ±20% of reference glucose values >5.6 mmol/l or within ±1.1 mmol/l of reference glucose values ≤5.6 mmol/l (%20/20), the mean and median absolute relative difference between CGM and reference value (MARD and median ARD, respectively) and Clarke error grid analysis (CEGA). A retrospective calibration scheme was used to determine whether calibration improved sensor accuracy. Multivariable regression models and subgroup analyses were used to determine the impact of clinical characteristics on accuracy assessments.
    RESULTS: A total of 326 adults hospitalised on 19 medical or surgical non-intensive care hospital floors were enrolled, providing 6648 matched glucose pairs. The %20/20 was 59.5%, the MARD was 19.2% and the median ARD was 16.8%. CEGA showed that 98.2% of values were in zone A (clinically accurate) and zone B (benign). Subgroups with lower accuracy metrics included those with severe anaemia, renal dysfunction and oedema. Application of a once-daily morning calibration schedule improved accuracy (MARD 11.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The CGM accuracy when used in hospital may be lower than that reported in the outpatient setting, but this may be improved with appropriate patient selection and daily calibration. Further research is needed to understand the role of CGM in inpatient settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估心脑血管疾病(CCD)对住院1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的负担和影响。
    方法:这是2016年至2019年美国国家住院患者样本中T1DM伴或不伴CCD患者的回顾性全国队列研究。住院死亡率,停留时间(LoS),并确定了医疗费用。
    结果:总共59,860例T1DM患者有CCD的初步诊断,1,382,934例没有。与无CCD患者相比,有CCD患者的中位数LoS更长(4.6vs.3天)。与没有CCD的患者相比,T1DM和CCD患者的住院死亡率更高(4.1%vs.1.1%,p<0.001)。所有T1DM合并CCD患者的估计总护理费用约为3.26亿美元。与非CCD入院患者相比,颅内出血的调整后死亡率最高(OR17.37,95CI12.68-23.79),肺栓塞(OR4.39,95CI2.70-7.13),心内膜炎(OR3.46,95CI1.22-9.84),急性心肌梗死(OR2.31,95CI1.92-2.77),和中风(OR1.47,95CI1.04-2.09)。
    结论:T1DM患者的CCD负担是巨大的,并且与医院死亡率和高医疗支出显著相关。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the burden and impact of cardiac and cerebrovascular disease (CCD) on hospital inpatients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
    METHODS: This is a retrospective nationwide cohort study of people with T1DM with or without CCD in the US National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019. The in-hospital mortality rates, length of stay (LoS), and healthcare costs were determined.
    RESULTS: A total of 59,860 T1DM patients had a primary diagnosis of CCD and 1,382,934 did not. The median LoS was longer for patients with CCD compared to no CCD (4.6 vs. 3 days). Patients with T1DM and CCD had greater in-hospital mortality compared to those without CCD (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). The estimated total care cost for all patients with T1DM with CCD was approximately USD 326 million. The adjusted odds of mortality compared to patients with non-CCD admission was greatest for intracranial hemorrhage (OR 17.37, 95%CI 12.68-23.79), pulmonary embolism (OR 4.39, 95%CI 2.70-7.13), endocarditis (OR 3.46, 95%CI 1.22-9.84), acute myocardial infarction (OR 2.31, 95%CI 1.92-2.77), and stroke (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.04-2.09).
    CONCLUSIONS: The burden of CCD in patients with T1DM is substantial and significantly associated with increased hospital mortality and high healthcare expenditures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是描述瑞士四个精神病院住院患者中苯二氮卓受体激动剂的处方模式。这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,包括2019年在瑞士一所大学医院的四个精神病院之一住院的65岁或以上的患者。的存在,在入院和出院时评估苯二氮卓受体激动剂的类型和剂量.三百八十六名患者(214名妇女,78.2±8.1年)纳入研究;33.4%的患者在入院时至少使用一种苯二氮卓受体激动剂,在出院时使用22.5%。标准化剂量中苯二氮卓受体激动剂处方的相对减少为78%。发现年龄是入院时对苯二氮卓受体激动剂处方的保护因素(调整后的比值比0.94,置信区间0.91-0.98),发现药物滥用的诊断是一个危险因素(调整后的比值比4.43,置信区间1.42-17.02).较长的住院时间(>14天)与苯二氮卓受体激动剂的减少有关。入院时服用苯二氮卓受体激动剂的患病率很高,但在精神病住院期间,苯二氮卓受体激动剂处方的绝对和相对值均下降。
    The aim of this study is to describe the patterns of prescription of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists in hospitalised patients in four psychogeriatric units in Switzerland. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study that included patients aged 65 years or more hospitalised in one of the four psychogeriatric units of a university hospital in Switzerland during 2019. The presence, type and dose of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists was assessed at admission and at discharge. Three-hundred and eighty-six patients (214 women, 78.2 ± 8.1 years) were included in the study; 33.4% of patients had at least one benzodiazepine-receptor agonist at admission and 22.5% at discharge. The relative reduction of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists prescription in standardised dose was 78%. Age was found to be a protective factor against benzodiazepine-receptor agonists prescription at admission (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, confidence interval 0.91-0.98), and diagnosis of substance abuse was found to be a risk factor (adjusted odds ratio 4.43, confidence interval 1.42-17.02). Longer hospital stays (> 14 days) were associated with higher reduction of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists. The prevalence of a prescription of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists at admission was high, but during the psychogeriatric hospitalisation benzodiazepine-receptor agonists prescription decreased both in absolute and relative terms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号