Immune checkpoint blocker

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症免疫疗法旨在释放免疫系统对抗癌细胞的潜能,为对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)有反应的肿瘤提供持续缓解。虽然在胃癌(GC)试验中很有前途,在腹膜播散的情况下,ICI的疗效降低。我们的目标是确定策略,以增强ICI治疗的影响,特别是对于涉及GC腹膜传播的病例。
    方法:抗PD1、CTLA4单独治疗的疗效,或组合使用YTN16腹膜播散肿瘤模型进行评估。收集腹膜和腹膜渗出物细胞用于后续分析。免疫组织化学染色,流式细胞术,进行了大量RNA序列分析以评估肿瘤微环境(TME)。基于途径分析结果,引入Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)。
    结果:抗PD1和抗CTLA4联合治疗(双重ICI治疗)在某些小鼠中显示出治疗功效,主要由CD8+T细胞介导。然而,在对双重ICI治疗有抗性的小鼠中,即使有CD8+T细胞浸润,大多数T细胞表现出耗尽表型。值得注意的是,与未治疗组相比,耐药肿瘤显示Janus激酶-信号转导和转录激活因子(JAK-STAT)途径的异常激活,观察到巨噬细胞的浸润,中性粒细胞,和TME中的Tregs。JAKi的同时给药挽救了CD8+T细胞功能并重塑了免疫抑制性TME,导致双重ICI治疗的疗效增强。
    结论:双重ICI治疗通过增加肿瘤特异性CD8+T细胞浸润发挥其抗肿瘤作用,JAKi的加入通过重塑免疫抑制TME进一步改善了ICI抗性。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer immunotherapy aims to unleash the immune system\'s potential against cancer cells, providing sustained relief for tumors responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While promising in gastric cancer (GC) trials, the efficacy of ICIs diminishes in the context of peritoneal dissemination. Our objective is to identify strategies to enhance the impact of ICI treatment specifically for cases involving peritoneal dissemination in GC.
    METHODS: The therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1, CTLA4 treatment alone, or in combination was assessed using the YTN16 peritoneal dissemination tumor model. Peritoneum and peritoneal exudate cells were collected for subsequent analysis. Immunohistochemical staining, flow cytometry, and bulk RNA-sequence analyses were conducted to evaluate the tumor microenvironment (TME). A Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was introduced based on the pathway analysis results.
    RESULTS: Anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination treatment (dual ICI treatment) demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in certain mice, primarily mediated by CD8 + T cells. However, in mice resistant to dual ICI treatment, even with CD8 + T cell infiltration, most of the T cells exhibited an exhaustion phenotype. Notably, resistant tumors displayed abnormal activation of the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway compared to the untreated group, with observed infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, and Tregs in the TME. The concurrent administration of JAKi rescued CD8 + T cells function and reshaped the immunosuppressive TME, resulting in enhanced efficacy of the dual ICI treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dual ICI treatment exerts its anti-tumor effects by increasing tumor-specific CD8 + T cell infiltration, and the addition of JAKi further improves ICI resistance by reshaping the immunosuppressive TME.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫检查点阻断剂(ICBs)可诱导免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),其管理基于专家意见,可能需要类固醇和/或免疫抑制剂(ISs)的处方。最近的数据表明,这些治疗可以降低ICB的有效性。
    目的:研究在ICB治疗的irAE患者中,使用类固醇和/或ISs与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)之间的关系。
    方法:我们前瞻性收集了法国REISAMIC队列中实体瘤或淋巴瘤患者的病历数据,这些患者在2014年6月至2020年6月期间接受了ICB治疗。
    结果:184例接受ICB治疗的患者经历了至少一个不良事件等级≥2irAE的通用术语标准。107(58.2%)单独使用类固醇治疗,20(10.9%)与类固醇加IS,57(31.0%)未接受类固醇或IS。仅使用类固醇治疗的患者的中位OS(25.2个月[95%置信区间(CI):22.3-32.4]明显短于未使用类固醇或IS治疗的患者(63个月[95CI:40.4-NA])和接受类固醇治疗的患者(53.4个月[95CI:47.3-NA])(p<0.001)。单独使用类固醇治疗的患者的中位PFS(17.0个月[95CI:11.7-22.9])明显短于未使用类固醇或IS治疗的患者(33.9个月[95CI:18.0-NA])和接受IS治疗的患者(41.1个月[95CI:26.2-NA])(p=0.006)。入院率和感染率无明显组间差异。
    结论:在ICB治疗患者的前瞻性队列中,IS的使用与较差的OS或PFS无关,与使用类固醇治疗irAE形成鲜明对比。
    BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) whose management is based on expert opinion and may require the prescription of steroids and/or immunosuppressants (ISs). Recent data suggest that these treatments can reduce the effectiveness of ICBs.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the use of steroids and/or ISs and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among ICB-treated patients with an irAE.
    METHODS: We prospectively collected data from the medical records of patients with solid tumors or lymphoma in the French REISAMIC cohort and who had been treated with ICBs between June 2014 and June 2020.
    RESULTS: 184 ICB-treated patients experienced at least one Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2 irAE. 107 (58.2%) were treated with steroids alone, 20 (10.9%) with steroids plus IS, 57 (31.0%) not received steroids or IS. The median OS was significantly shorter for patients treated with steroids alone (25.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.3-32.4] than for patients treated without steroids or IS (63 months [95%CI: 40.4-NA]) and those receiving an IS with steroids (53.4 months [95%CI: 47.3-NA]) (p < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly shorter for patients treated with steroids alone (17.0 months [95%CI: 11.7-22.9]) than for patients treated without steroids or IS (33.9 months [95%CI: 18.0-NA]) and those receiving an IS with steroids (41.1 months [95%CI: 26.2-NA]) (p = 0.006). There were no significant intergroup differences in the hospital admission and infection rates.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective cohort of ICB-treated patients, the use of IS was not associated with worse OS or PFS, contrasting with the use of steroids for the management of irAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:我们研究了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)再激发在先前的全身性治疗中接受基于ICI治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效和安全性。
    未经评估:在这个国际上,回顾性多中心研究,在14个机构接受至少两行基于ICI的治疗(ICI-1,ICI-2)的HCC患者符合资格.主要结果包括最佳总体反应和治疗相关不良事件。
    未经证实:在994名接受ICI治疗的患者中,共有58名患者(男性,n=41;71%),平均年龄为65.0±9.0岁。ICI-1和ICI-2的系统治疗线中位数为1(范围,1-4)和3(范围,2-9),分别。ICI-1和ICI-2使用的基于ICI的治疗包括单独的ICI(ICI-1,n=26,45%;ICI-2,n=4,7%),双重ICI方案(n=1,2%;n=12,21%),或ICI联合靶向治疗/抗VEGF(n=31,53%;n=42,72%)。大多数患者因进展而停用ICI-1(n=52,90%)。ICI-1的客观反应率为22%,ICI-2的客观反应率为26%。在患有进行性疾病的患者中,ICI-2的反应也是ICI-1的最佳总体反应(n=11/21;52%)。ICI-1和ICI-2的中位进展时间分别为5.4(95%CI3.0-7.7)个月和5.2(95%CI3.3-7.0)个月,分别。在9例(16%)和10例(17%)患者中观察到ICI-1和ICI-2的治疗相关不良事件为3-4级,分别。
    UNASSIGNED:ICI再激发是安全的,并且在相当比例的HCC患者中获得了治疗益处。这些数据为在前瞻性试验中一线免疫治疗进展的患者中研究基于ICI的方案提供了理论基础。
    UNASSIGNED:基于一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗后的治疗测序仍然是一个挑战,因为在免疫治疗预处理患者中没有研究可用的二线治疗方案。特别是,ICI再激发在HCC患者中的作用尚不清楚,由于缺乏前瞻性试验的数据.我们调查了ICI为基础的方案的疗效和安全性在肝癌患者的免疫治疗前,国际,多中心研究。我们的数据为研究基于ICI的治疗方案在一线免疫治疗进展患者中的作用的前瞻性试验提供了理论基础。
    UNASSIGNED: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line.
    UNASSIGNED: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管已经确定了许多肺腺癌(LUAD)的生物标志物,其特异性和敏感性仍不能令人满意.内皮脂肪酶基因(LIPG)在多种肿瘤中发挥着重要作用,但其在肺腺癌中的作用尚不清楚。
    方法:TCGA,GEO,K-M绘图仪,CIBERSORT,GSEA,HPA,用GDSC分析LUAD中的LIPG。数据分析主要由R4.0.3实现。
    结果:LIPG在LUAD组织中的表达高于癌旁正常组织,尤其是女性,年龄>65岁的患者,还有那些有淋巴结转移的.高表达预测不良预后。富集分析结果表明,LIPG可能通过脂质代谢和免疫系统调节的多个阶段对LUAD的发生发展产生深远的影响。此外,LIPG的表达与多种免疫检查点基因的表达水平和多种免疫浸润物的丰度显著相关,包括激活的记忆CD4T细胞,M1巨噬细胞,中性粒细胞,浆细胞,和T滤泡辅助(Tfh)细胞在LUAD微环境中的含量。同时,LIPG高表达患者对多种抗肿瘤药物反应良好,耐药率低。
    结论:LIPG是一种预后标志物,与LUAD的脂质代谢和免疫浸润有关。
    BACKGROUND: Although many biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have been identified, their specificity and sensitivity remain unsatisfactory. Endothelial lipase gene (LIPG) plays an important role in a variety of cancers, but its role in lung adenocarcinoma remains unclear.
    METHODS: TCGA, GEO, K-M plotter, CIBERSORT, GSEA, HPA, and GDSC were used to analyze LIPG in LUAD. Data analysis was mainly achieved by R 4.0.3.
    RESULTS: The expression of LIPG in LUAD tissues was higher than that in adjacent normal tissues, especially in women, patients aged >65 years, and those with lymph node metastasis. High expression predicted a poor prognosis. The results of enrichment analysis suggest that LIPG may exert profound effects on the development of LUAD through multiple stages of lipid metabolism and immune system regulation. In addition, LIPG expression was significantly correlated with the expression levels of multiple immune checkpoint genes and the abundance of multiple immune infiltrates, including the activated memory CD4 T cell, M1 macrophage, neutrophil, plasma cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in the LUAD microenvironment content. At the same time, patients with high LIPG expression respond well to a variety of antitumor drugs and have a low rate of drug resistance.
    CONCLUSIONS: LIPG is a prognostic marker and is associated with lipid metabolism and immune infiltration in LUAD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在HIV/SIV感染期间,免疫检查点(IC)标记的上调,程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(PD-1),细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4(CTLA-4),T细胞免疫球蛋白和ITIM结构域(TIGIT),淋巴细胞激活基因-3(LAG-3),T细胞免疫球蛋白和粘蛋白结构域-3(Tim-3),CD160,2B4(CD244),和T细胞激活的V域Ig抑制因子(VISTA),会导致慢性T细胞衰竭。这些IC通过介导T细胞反应以及富集潜伏的病毒储库在调节HIV/SIV感染的进展中起主要作用。已经证明,ICs在CD4+和CD8+T细胞上的增强表达可以抑制细胞增殖和细胞因子产生。IC在CD4+T细胞上的过表达也可以格式化和延长HIV/SIV的持久性。IC阻滞剂在HIV治疗中显示出了有希望的临床结果,这意味着靶向IC可以在抑制HIV的背景下优化抗逆转录病毒治疗。这里,我们系统地回顾了表达谱,生物调节,以及在HIV/SIV感染中靶向免疫检查点的治疗效果。
    During HIV/SIV infection, the upregulation of immune checkpoint (IC) markers, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3 (Tim-3), CD160, 2B4 (CD244), and V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), can lead to chronic T cell exhaustion. These ICs play predominant roles in regulating the progression of HIV/SIV infection by mediating T cell responses as well as enriching latent viral reservoirs. It has been demonstrated that enhanced expression of ICs on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells could inhibit cell proliferation and cytokine production. Overexpression of ICs on CD4+ T cells could also format and prolong HIV/SIV persistence. IC blockers have shown promising clinical results in HIV therapy, implying that targeting ICs may optimize antiretroviral therapy in the context of HIV suppression. Here, we systematically review the expression profile, biological regulation, and therapeutic efficacy of targeted immune checkpoints in HIV/SIV infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    应始终考虑免疫系统在乳腺癌(BC)进展/消退中的关键作用。已经对BC进行了各种免疫治疗方法的研究,包括肿瘤靶向抗体(双特异性抗体),过继性T细胞疗法,疫苗,和免疫检查点阻断如抗PD-1。此外,常规化疗和免疫治疗相结合有助于提高患者的总体生存率.尽管在大多数免疫治疗的临床试验中已经报道了令人鼓舞的结果,在这方面仍然应该解决一些障碍。最近,个性化免疫疗法已被提出作为克服BC的免疫疗法和化学疗法的潜在补充药物。因此,这篇综述讨论了这些方法的简要关联以及BC免疫治疗的未来方向.
    The crucial role of the immune system in the progression/regression of breast cancer (BC) should always be taken into account. Various immunotherapy approaches have been investigated for BC, including tumor-targeting antibodies (bispecific antibodies), adoptive T cell therapy, vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade such as anti-PD-1. In addition, a combination of conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy approaches contributes to improving patients\' overall survival rates. Although encouraging outcomes have been reported in most clinical trials of immunotherapy, some obstacles should still be resolved in this regard. Recently, personalized immunotherapy has been proposed as a potential complementary medicine with immunotherapy and chemotherapy for overcoming BC. Accordingly, this review discusses the brief association of these methods and future directions in BC immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了许多机制来解释糖尿病状态与感染易感性增加之间的公认联系。值得注意的是,糖尿病已被证明是影响COVID-19感染医疗结果的最强因素之一。尽管人们早就注意到淋巴细胞在免疫激活后上调胰岛素受体,直到最近,这一观察很少受到关注。这里,我们指出,关键发现提示免疫细胞中胰岛素信号传导失调可能是与糖尿病相关的免疫病理学因素.机械上,胰岛素,通过激活PI3K/Akt/mTOR通路,调节骨髓细胞和淋巴细胞的各个方面,比如细胞存活,代谢重编程和免疫细胞的极化和分化。PI3K信号也被免疫检查点蛋白抑制,提示胰岛素信号可能拮抗外周耐受。值得注意的是,最近还表明,胰岛素结合后,胰岛素受体转位到细胞核,在调节各种免疫相关基因的转录中起关键作用,包括涉及病毒感染的途径。一起来看,这些观察结果表明,在COVID-19感染期间,胰岛素信号传导失调可能直接导致免疫应答缺陷.
    A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the well-established link between diabetic status and an increased susceptibility to infection. Notably, diabetes has been shown to be one of the strongest factors influencing healthcare outcome in COVID-19 infections. Though it has long been noted that lymphocytes upregulate insulin receptors following immune activation, until recently, this observation has received little attention. Here, we point out key findings implicating dysregulated insulin signalling in immune cells as a possible contributing factor in the immune pathology associated with diabetes. Mechanistically, insulin, by activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, regulates various aspects of both myeloid cells and lymphocytes, such as cell survival, metabolic reprogramming and the polarization and differentiation of immune cells. PI3K signalling is also supressed by immune checkpoint proteins, suggesting that insulin signalling may antagonize peripheral tolerance. Remarkably, it has also recently been shown that, following insulin binding, the insulin receptor translocates to the nucleus where it plays a key role in regulating the transcription of various immune-related genes, including pathways involved in viral infections. Taken together, these observations suggest that dysregulated insulin signalling may directly contribute to a defective immune response during COVID-19 infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been proven to be an effective strategy for enhancing the effector activity of anti-tumor T cells, and checkpoint blockers targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 have displayed strong and durable clinical responses in certain cancer patients. The new hope brought by ICB therapy has led to the boost in therapeutic development of ICBs in recent years. Nonetheless, the therapeutic efficacy of ICBs varies substantially among cancer types and patients, and only a proportion of cancer patients could benefit from ICBs. The emerging targets and molecules for enhancing anticancer immunity may bring additional therapeutic opportunities for cancer patients. The current challenges in the ICB therapy have been discussed, aimed to provide further strategies for maximizing the efficacy of ICB therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号