Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias

特发性间质性肺炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通常的无蜂窝(可能的UIP)的间质性肺炎(UIP)病例包括各种CT特征,通常难以诊断。
    目的:本研究旨在利用聚类分析对可能存在UIP的病例进行CT特征分类,并评估参与者亚群的特征和预后的相关性。
    方法:该研究纳入了2011年特发性肺纤维化(IPF)指南中85例可能患有UIP的患者,并进行放射学诊断。所有病例均接受了手术活检,并通过日本全国注册中心的多学科讨论(MDD)进行了诊断。读者评估了肺部混浊,结节,囊肿,和占主导地位的分布,在2018年被IPF指南重新分类。此外,根据CT检查结果,通过聚类分析将病例分为四组.评估IPF分类和聚类之间的生存差异。
    结果:病例被诊断为IPF(n=55),NSIP(n=4),不可分类(n=23),和其他人(n=3)通过MDD。聚类分析显示CT特征有4个簇(分别为n=47、16、19和3)。第1组整体病变较少。集群2具有许多纯磨玻璃混浊物和带有网状的磨玻璃混浊物。簇3有许多网状混浊和结节,很少有较低的优势分布。集群4的特征是支气管血管周围巩固。集群1的平均生存时间(4518天)明显优于集群2、3和4(1843、2196和1814天,分别)(p=0.03)。
    结论:结论:没有蜂窝的UIP包括各种CT模式和MDD诊断。在根据CT表现分类的簇之间观察到预后的显着差异。
    BACKGROUND: Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) cases without honeycombing (possible UIP) included various CT features and was often difficult to diagnose.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to classify the cases with possible UIP on CT features using cluster analysis and evaluate the features of subsets of participants and the correlation of prognosis.
    METHODS: The study included 85 patients with possible UIP in the 2011 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guideline with radiological diagnosis. All cases underwent surgical biopsies and were diagnosed by multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) from the nationwide registry in Japan. The readers evaluated pulmonary opacity, nodules, cysts, and predominant distribution which were reclassified by IPF guidelines in 2018. Additionally, cases were classified into four groups by cluster analysis based on CT findings. The differences in survival among IPF classification and the clusters were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Cases were diagnosed as IPF (n = 55), NSIP (n = 4), unclassifiable (n = 23), and others (n = 3) by MDD. Cluster analysis revealed 4 clusters by CT features (n = 47, 16, 19 and 3, respectively). Cluster 1 had fewer lesions overall. Cluster 2 have many pure ground-glass opacities and ground-glass opacities with reticulation. Cluster 3 had many reticular opacities and nodules with few lower predominant distributions. Cluster 4 was characterized by peribronchovascular consolidation.The mean survival time of cluster 1 (4518 days) was significantly better than cluster 2, 3, and 4 (1843, 2196, and 1814 days, respectively) (p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, UIP without honeycombing included various CT patterns and MDD diagnoses. Significangly differences in prognosis were observed among clusters classified by CT findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可吸入结晶二氧化硅是矽肺的众所周知的原因,但也可能与其他类型的间质性肺病有关。我们研究了职业暴露于可吸入结晶二氧化硅与特发性间质性肺炎风险之间的关系,肺结节病和矽肺。
    方法:丹麦总劳动人口为1977-2015年。使用定量工作暴露矩阵估算了每年个人对可吸入结晶二氧化硅的暴露。病例在丹麦国家患者登记册中确定。我们对累积二氧化硅暴露和其他暴露指标与特发性间质性肺炎之间的暴露-反应关系进行了调整分析,肺结节病和矽肺。
    结果:暴露工人的平均累积暴露量为125µg/m3-年。我们观察到特发性间质性肺炎的发病率比率随着累积二氧化硅暴露量的增加而增加,肺结节病和矽肺。对于特发性间质性肺炎和肺结节病,每50微克/立方米年的趋势分别为1.03(95%CI1.02至1.03)和1.06(95%CI1.04至1.07),分别。对于矽肺病,我们观察到众所周知的暴露-反应关系,每50µg/m3-年的趋势为1.20(95%CI1.17~1.23).
    结论:这项研究表明,吸入二氧化硅可能与肺结节病和特发性间质性肺炎有关,尽管这些发现可能在某种程度上可以通过诊断错误分类来解释。在累积暴露水平低于先前报道的情况下,观察到的矽肺暴露-反应关系需要在解决本研究局限性的分析中得到证实。
    BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica is a well-known cause of silicosis but may also be associated with other types of interstitial lung disease. We examined the associations between occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and the risk of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis.
    METHODS: The total Danish working population was followed 1977-2015. Annual individual exposure to respirable crystalline silica was estimated using a quantitative job exposure matrix. Cases were identified in the Danish National Patient Register. We conducted adjusted analyses of exposure-response relations between cumulative silica exposure and other exposure metrics and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis.
    RESULTS: Mean cumulative exposure was 125 µg/m3-years among exposed workers. We observed increasing incidence rate ratios with increasing cumulative silica exposure for idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis. For idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and pulmonary sarcoidosis, trends per 50 µg/m3-years were 1.03 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.03) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.07), respectively. For silicosis, we observed the well-known exposure-response relation with a trend per 50 µg/m3-years of 1.20 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.23).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that silica inhalation may be related to pulmonary sarcoidosis and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, though these findings may to some extent be explained by diagnostic misclassification. The observed exposure-response relations for silicosis at lower cumulative exposure levels than previously reported need to be corroborated in analyses that address the limitations of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对晚期肺癌和特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)的有效治疗仍未满足医疗需求。晚期肺癌化疗的有效性与IIP急性加重风险之间的关系研究甚少。有限的证据表明,在细胞毒性化疗期间经历IIP急性加重的患者比没有经历的患者具有较差的预后。在我们发表的来自110个日本机构的多中心回顾性研究中招募的1004名晚期肺癌和IIP患者中,708名患者(男:女,645:63;平均年龄,70.4)接受一线化疗。分析化疗引发的IIPs急性加重的发生和总生存期(OS)。在四个标志性时间点(30、60、90和120天)比较有急性加重和无急性加重的患者组之间的OS。从一线化疗开始,使用地标方法。接受一线化疗的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者急性加重的发生率在NSCLC患者中高于SCLC患者(4.2%vs12.6%;比值比[OR]:3.316;95%置信区间[CI]1.25-8.8)。中位生存时间为9.9个月(95%CI9.2-10.7)。经历急性加重的患者在不同时间点的生存结果明显比没有急性加重的患者差(30天,危险比[HR]:5.191,95%CI2.889-9.328;60天,HR:2.351,95%CI1.104-5.009;90天,HR:2.416,95%CI1.232-4.739;120天,HR:2.521,95%CI1.357-4.681)。一线化疗期间的急性加重可以预测不良生存率。试用注册号:UMIN000018227。
    Effective treatment for advanced lung cancer and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) remains an unmet medical need. The relationship between chemotherapy\'s effectiveness in advanced lung cancer and the risk of acute exacerbation of IIP is poorly investigated. There is limited evidence that patients who experience an acute exacerbation of IIPs during cytotoxic chemotherapy have poorer outcomes than those who do not. Among 1004 patients with advanced lung cancer and IIPs enrolled in our published multi-centre retrospective study from 110 Japanese institutions, 708 patients (male: female, 645:63; mean age, 70.4) received first-line chemotherapy. The occurrence of chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbations of IIPs and overall survival (OS) were analysed. The OS between groups of patients with and without the occurrence of acute exacerbation was compared at four landmark time points (30, 60, 90, and 120 days), starting from the first-line chemotherapy, using the landmark method. The incidence of acute exacerbation in patients who received first-line chemotherapy with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was more frequent in NSCLC patients than in SCLC (4.2% vs 12.6%; odds ratio [OR]: 3.316; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-8.8). Median survival time was 9.9 months (95% CI 9.2-10.7). Patients who experienced acute exacerbation had significant worse survival outcomes than those who did not at various time points (30 days, hazard ratio [HR]: 5.191, 95% CI 2.889-9.328; 60 days, HR: 2.351, 95% CI 1.104-5.009; 90 days, HR: 2.416, 95% CI 1.232-4.739; and 120 days, HR: 2.521, 95% CI 1.357-4.681). Acute exacerbation during first-line chemotherapy can predict poor survival.Trial Registration number: UMIN000018227.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)是间质性肺病(ILD)的更广泛类别的异质组,病理特征为间质性炎症和/或纤维化引起的肺实质变形。美国胸科学会(ATS)/欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)IIP的国际多学科共识分类于2002年发表,然后于2013年更新,作者强调需要多学科方法来诊断IIP。IIP的组织学评估具有挑战性,和不同类型的IIP通常与特定的组织病理学模式相关。然而,可以观察到形态重叠,在完全不同的临床环境中可以看到相同的组织病理学特征。因此,病理学家的目的是在这种临床环境中识别疾病的病理形态学模式,只有经过多学科评估,如果临床和放射学检查结果一致,可以建立特定IIP的明确诊断,允许患者的最佳临床治疗管理。
    Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist\'s aim is to recognize the pathologic-morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical-therapeutic management of the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:某些患者发生需要住院治疗的纤维化特发性间质性肺炎(fIIP)急性加重(AEs)。住院期间,这些患者可以发展为医院获得性肺炎(HAP),一种常见的医院获得性感染,死亡率高。然而,AE-fIIP中HAP的特征仍然未知。这项研究的目的是确定发病率,致病性病原体,AE-fIIP患者的HAP结局。
    方法:对2008年1月至2019年12月连续住院AE-fIIP患者的病历进行发病率分析。致病病原体,和HAP的生存。从分析中排除具有明显感染触发的AE的患者的记录。
    结果:128例AE-fIIP患者(89例特发性肺纤维化[IPF]和39例非IPFfIIP)共住院155次(111例IPF和44例非IPFfIIP)。49例患者发生HAP(40例IPF和9例非IPFfIIP)。AE-fIIP患者的HAP发病率和院内死亡率较高,分别为32.2%和48.9%,分别。棒状杆菌属。是最常见的病原体,其次是人巨细胞病毒(HCMV)。
    结论:AE-fIIP患者的HAP发病率和院内死亡率较高。为了改善他们的生存,有AE和HAP的fIIP患者,对于可能的棒状杆菌属感染,应及时接受经验性治疗.和HCMV测试。
    BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations (AEs) of fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (fIIP) that require hospitalization occur in some patients. During hospitalization, these patients can develop hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), a common hospital-acquired infection with a high mortality rate. However, the characteristics of HAP in AE-fIIP remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, causative pathogens, and outcomes of HAP in patients with AE-fIIP.
    METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients who were hospitalized with AE-fIIP from January 2008 to December 2019 were analyzed for the incidence, causative pathogen, and survival of HAP. The records of patients with an obvious infection-triggered AE were excluded from analysis.
    RESULTS: There were 128 patients with AE-fIIP (89 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF] and 39 with non-IPF fIIP) who were hospitalized a total of 155 times (111 with IPF and 44 with non-IPF fIIP). HAP occurred in 49 patients (40 with IPF and 9 with non-IPF fIIP). The incidence and the in-hospital mortality rates of HAP in patients with AE-fIIP were high, at 32.2% and 48.9%, respectively. Corynebacterium spp. was the most common causative pathogen, which was followed by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV).
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and the in-hospital mortality rates of HAP in patients with AE-fIIP are high. To improve their survival, patients with fIIP who had AEs and HAP should receive prompt empirical treatment for possible infections with Corynebacterium spp. and testing for HCMV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自身抗体是结缔组织病(CTD)的标志性特征。它们在特发性间质性肺病(ILD)患者中的存在可能提示隐性CTD。我们旨在确定诊断为特发性ILD的患者中CTD自身抗体的患病率。
    方法:分析499例患者血清:251例特发性肺纤维化(IPF),206例特发性非特异性间质性肺炎(iNSIP)和42例隐源性器质性肺炎(COP)。通过免疫沉淀确定自身抗体状态。
    结果:2.4%的IPF血清具有CTD自身抗体,而10.2%的iNSIP和7.3%的COP。45%的自身抗体是抗合成酶。在7名IPF患者(2.8%)和2名NSIP(1%)患者中发现了靶向未知56kDa蛋白的新型自身抗体。这被称为反膜联蛋白A11。
    结论:关于ILD患者自身抗体检测和解释的具体指导可以提高诊断准确性。需要进一步的工作来确定抗膜联蛋白A11的临床意义。
    BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies are a hallmark feature of Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). Their presence in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) may suggest covert CTD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CTD autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with idiopathic ILD.
    METHODS: 499 patient sera were analysed: 251 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 206 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and 42 cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP). Autoantibody status was determined by immunoprecipitation.
    RESULTS: 2.4% of IPF sera had a CTD-autoantibody compared to 10.2% of iNSIP and 7.3% of COP. 45% of autoantibodies were anti-synthetases. A novel autoantibody targeting an unknown 56 kDa protein was found in seven IPF patients (2.8%) and two NSIP (1%) patients. This was characterised as anti-annexin A11.
    CONCLUSIONS: Specific guidance on autoantibody testing and interpretation in patients with ILD could improve diagnostic accuracy. Further work is required to determine the clinical significance of anti-annexin A11.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然以特发性肺纤维化(IPF)为中心的特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)是最常见的间质性肺病(ILD),尤其是在老年人口,结缔组织病(CTD)相关的ILD是第二普遍的ILD。IPF的发病机制主要是纤维化,而其他ILD,特别是CTD-ILD,主要是炎症。因此,准确的诊断对于选择合适的治疗方法至关重要,如抗纤维化或免疫抑制剂。此外,一些IIP患者具有CTD相关特征,比如关节炎和皮肤出疹,但不符合任何CTD的标准,这被称为具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF).IPAF与特发性非特异性间质性肺炎(iNSIP)和隐源性机化性肺炎(COP)密切相关。此外,iNSIP或NSIP伴OP重叠的患者在诊断IIP后经常发生多发性肌炎/皮肌炎.ILD急性加重,最常见的死因,IPF患者的发病率高于其他ILD患者。尽管CTD-ILD的急性加重发生率较低,类风湿性关节炎患者,显微镜下多血管炎,与其他CTD相比,系统性硬化症或CTD-ILD的急性加重。在这次审查中,每个IIP的特征,专注于CTD相关的签名,总结,并讨论了各种ILD患者的发病机制和改善预后的适当治疗方法。
    While idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) centering on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most prevalent interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially in the older adult population, connective tissue disease (CTD)-related ILD is the second most prevalent ILD. The pathogenesis of IPF is primarily fibrosis, whereas that of other ILDs, particularly CTD-ILD, is mainly inflammation. Therefore, a precise diagnosis is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments, such as antifibrotic or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, some patients with IIP have CTD-related features, such as arthritis and skin eruption, but do not meet the criteria for any CTD, this is referred to as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). IPAF is closely associated with idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP). Furthermore, patients with iNSIP or those with NSIP with OP overlap frequently develop polymyositis/dermatomyositis after the diagnosis of IIP. Acute exacerbation of ILD, the most common cause of death, occurs more frequently in patients with IPF than in those with other ILDs. Although acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD occurs at a low rate of incidence, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, microscopic polyangiitis, or systemic sclerosis experience more acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD than those with other CTD. In this review, the features of each IIP, focusing on CTD-related signatures, are summarized, and the pathogenesis and appropriate treatments to improve the prognoses of patients with various ILDs are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:特发性肺纤维化(AE-IPF)急性加重会影响很大比例的IPF患者。有有限的数据来告知AE-IPF的治疗策略,尽管死亡率很高。我们讨论了STRIVE-IPF的基本原理和设计,一个随机的,多中心,开放标签IIb期临床试验,以确定联合治疗性血浆置换(TPE)的疗效,利妥昔单抗,和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),与常规治疗(TAU)相比,在急性IPF加重患者中。
    方法:STRIVE-IPF试验将在美国5个研究中心随机分配51名患者。纳入标准旨在选择患有AE-IPF的研究人群,根据美国胸科学会标准的定义,同时排除有其他原因导致呼吸代偿失调的患者。该试验的主要终点是6个月的生存期。次要终点包括补充氧需求和六分钟步行距离,这将在治疗前立即进行评估,并在第19天完成治疗后,以及在随后的定期就诊时进行评估。
    结论:本临床试验中提出的实验性AE-IPF疗法改编自其他抗体介导的疾病的治疗方案。该方案由TPE开始,有望迅速减少循环中的自身抗体,其次是利妥昔单抗以减少B细胞,最后是IVIG,可能有多种影响,包括通过Fc受体占据影响残余B细胞的反馈抑制。我们在以前的轶事报道中报道了这种实验性治疗AE-IPF的潜在益处。该临床试验具有深刻影响AE-IPF患者的当前范例和治疗方法的潜力。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03286556。
    BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) affect a significant proportion of patients with IPF. There are limited data to inform therapeutic strategies for AE-IPF, despite its high mortality. We discuss the rationale and design of STRIVE-IPF, a randomized, multi-center, open-label Phase IIb clinical trial to determine the efficacy of combined therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), in comparison to treatment as usual (TAU), among patients with acute IPF exacerbations.
    METHODS: The STRIVE-IPF trial will randomize 51 patients among five sites in the United States. The inclusion criteria have been designed to select a study population with AE-IPF, as defined by American Thoracic Society criteria, while excluding patients with an alternative cause for a respiratory decompensation. The primary endpoint of this trial is six-month survival. Secondary endpoints include supplement oxygen requirement and six-minute walk distance which will be assessed immediately prior to treatment and after completion of therapy on day 19, as well as at periodic subsequent visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experimental AE-IPF therapy proposed in this clinical trial was adapted from treatment regimens used in other antibody-mediated diseases. The regimen is initiated with TPE, which is expected to rapidly reduce circulating autoantibodies, followed by rituximab to reduce B-cells and finally IVIG, which likely has multiple effects, including affecting feedback inhibition of residual B-cells by Fc receptor occupancy. We have reported potential benefits of this experimental therapy for AE-IPF in previous anecdotal reports. This clinical trial has the potential to profoundly affect current paradigms and treatment approaches to patients with AE-IPF.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03286556.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号