Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias

特发性间质性肺炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可吸入结晶二氧化硅是矽肺的众所周知的原因,但也可能与其他类型的间质性肺病有关。我们研究了职业暴露于可吸入结晶二氧化硅与特发性间质性肺炎风险之间的关系,肺结节病和矽肺。
    方法:丹麦总劳动人口为1977-2015年。使用定量工作暴露矩阵估算了每年个人对可吸入结晶二氧化硅的暴露。病例在丹麦国家患者登记册中确定。我们对累积二氧化硅暴露和其他暴露指标与特发性间质性肺炎之间的暴露-反应关系进行了调整分析,肺结节病和矽肺。
    结果:暴露工人的平均累积暴露量为125µg/m3-年。我们观察到特发性间质性肺炎的发病率比率随着累积二氧化硅暴露量的增加而增加,肺结节病和矽肺。对于特发性间质性肺炎和肺结节病,每50微克/立方米年的趋势分别为1.03(95%CI1.02至1.03)和1.06(95%CI1.04至1.07),分别。对于矽肺病,我们观察到众所周知的暴露-反应关系,每50µg/m3-年的趋势为1.20(95%CI1.17~1.23).
    结论:这项研究表明,吸入二氧化硅可能与肺结节病和特发性间质性肺炎有关,尽管这些发现可能在某种程度上可以通过诊断错误分类来解释。在累积暴露水平低于先前报道的情况下,观察到的矽肺暴露-反应关系需要在解决本研究局限性的分析中得到证实。
    BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica is a well-known cause of silicosis but may also be associated with other types of interstitial lung disease. We examined the associations between occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and the risk of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis.
    METHODS: The total Danish working population was followed 1977-2015. Annual individual exposure to respirable crystalline silica was estimated using a quantitative job exposure matrix. Cases were identified in the Danish National Patient Register. We conducted adjusted analyses of exposure-response relations between cumulative silica exposure and other exposure metrics and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis.
    RESULTS: Mean cumulative exposure was 125 µg/m3-years among exposed workers. We observed increasing incidence rate ratios with increasing cumulative silica exposure for idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, pulmonary sarcoidosis and silicosis. For idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and pulmonary sarcoidosis, trends per 50 µg/m3-years were 1.03 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.03) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.07), respectively. For silicosis, we observed the well-known exposure-response relation with a trend per 50 µg/m3-years of 1.20 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.23).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that silica inhalation may be related to pulmonary sarcoidosis and idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, though these findings may to some extent be explained by diagnostic misclassification. The observed exposure-response relations for silicosis at lower cumulative exposure levels than previously reported need to be corroborated in analyses that address the limitations of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:特发性肺纤维化(AE-IPF)急性加重会影响很大比例的IPF患者。有有限的数据来告知AE-IPF的治疗策略,尽管死亡率很高。我们讨论了STRIVE-IPF的基本原理和设计,一个随机的,多中心,开放标签IIb期临床试验,以确定联合治疗性血浆置换(TPE)的疗效,利妥昔单抗,和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),与常规治疗(TAU)相比,在急性IPF加重患者中。
    方法:STRIVE-IPF试验将在美国5个研究中心随机分配51名患者。纳入标准旨在选择患有AE-IPF的研究人群,根据美国胸科学会标准的定义,同时排除有其他原因导致呼吸代偿失调的患者。该试验的主要终点是6个月的生存期。次要终点包括补充氧需求和六分钟步行距离,这将在治疗前立即进行评估,并在第19天完成治疗后,以及在随后的定期就诊时进行评估。
    结论:本临床试验中提出的实验性AE-IPF疗法改编自其他抗体介导的疾病的治疗方案。该方案由TPE开始,有望迅速减少循环中的自身抗体,其次是利妥昔单抗以减少B细胞,最后是IVIG,可能有多种影响,包括通过Fc受体占据影响残余B细胞的反馈抑制。我们在以前的轶事报道中报道了这种实验性治疗AE-IPF的潜在益处。该临床试验具有深刻影响AE-IPF患者的当前范例和治疗方法的潜力。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03286556。
    BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) affect a significant proportion of patients with IPF. There are limited data to inform therapeutic strategies for AE-IPF, despite its high mortality. We discuss the rationale and design of STRIVE-IPF, a randomized, multi-center, open-label Phase IIb clinical trial to determine the efficacy of combined therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), in comparison to treatment as usual (TAU), among patients with acute IPF exacerbations.
    METHODS: The STRIVE-IPF trial will randomize 51 patients among five sites in the United States. The inclusion criteria have been designed to select a study population with AE-IPF, as defined by American Thoracic Society criteria, while excluding patients with an alternative cause for a respiratory decompensation. The primary endpoint of this trial is six-month survival. Secondary endpoints include supplement oxygen requirement and six-minute walk distance which will be assessed immediately prior to treatment and after completion of therapy on day 19, as well as at periodic subsequent visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experimental AE-IPF therapy proposed in this clinical trial was adapted from treatment regimens used in other antibody-mediated diseases. The regimen is initiated with TPE, which is expected to rapidly reduce circulating autoantibodies, followed by rituximab to reduce B-cells and finally IVIG, which likely has multiple effects, including affecting feedback inhibition of residual B-cells by Fc receptor occupancy. We have reported potential benefits of this experimental therapy for AE-IPF in previous anecdotal reports. This clinical trial has the potential to profoundly affect current paradigms and treatment approaches to patients with AE-IPF.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03286556.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)患者如果患有具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF),预后良好。然而,高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)和肺组织病理学标本的IPAF相关结果和治疗反应尚未完全确定.因此,本研究旨在评估HRCT或肺组织病理学标本的发现与IPAF患者间质性肺炎进展之间的关系.
    方法:这项多中心队列研究前瞻性招募了连续的IIP患者。在IIP的诊断中,我们系统评估了提示结缔组织疾病的74项特征并进行了随访.HRCT,肺标本,血清抗体,并对临床病程进行了评估。
    结果:在222例IIP患者中,26(11.7%)符合IPAF标准。在36个月的中位观察期内,IPAF患者的生存率优于无IPAF患者(p=0.034).虽然组织病理学发现与IPAF无关,非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)与机化性肺炎(OP)重叠是最常见的HRCT模式(p<0.001),巩固性不透明是IPAF中最常见的放射学表现(p=0.017).此外,在IPAF患者中,与特发性肺纤维化患者相比,COP或NSIP与OP重叠的诊断与1年内%FVC的增加有关,NSIP,或不可分类的IIP(p=0.002)。
    结论:本研究显示HRCT上实变不透明的存在以及COP或NSIP与OP重叠的诊断与IPAF及其在IPAF患者中的良好治疗反应相关。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) have a favourable prognosis when they have interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). However, precise IPAF-related findings from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and lung histopathological specimens and the treatment response have not been fully determined. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between findings on HRCT or lung histopathological specimens and the progression of interstitial pneumonia in patients with IPAF.
    METHODS: This multicentre cohort study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with IIP. At the diagnosis of IIP, we systematically evaluated 74 features suggestive of connective tissue diseases and followed them up. HRCT, lung specimens, serum antibodies, and the clinical course were also evaluated.
    RESULTS: Among 222 patients with IIP, 26 (11.7%) fulfilled the IPAF criteria. During a median observation period of 36 months, patients with IPAF showed better survival than those without IPAF (p = 0.034). While histopathological findings were not related to IPAF, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) with organizing pneumonia (OP) overlap was the most prevalent HRCT pattern (p < 0.001) and the consolidation opacity was the most common radiological finding in IPAF (p = 0.017). Furthermore, in patients with IPAF, the diagnosis of COP or NSIP with OP overlap was associated with a higher increase in %FVC in 1 year than in those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, NSIP, or unclassifiable IIP (p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the presence of consolidation opacity on HRCT and the diagnosis of COP or NSIP with OP overlap are associated with IPAF and its favourable treatment response in patients with IPAF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨原发性干燥综合征(pSS)合并间质性肺病(ILD)的临床和实验室特点,探讨pSS-ILD患者呼吸道感染的危险因素。
    方法:纳入2015-2020年北京大学人民医院162例pSS-ILD患者的队列,所有的医疗记录都被完全收集了.我们筛选了53例呼吸道感染患者作为研究病例,与109个年龄和性别匹配的对照相比。比较感染组与对照组的差异。进行单变量和多变量二元logistic回归测试以确定pSS-ILD患者呼吸道感染的潜在危险因素。
    结果:在162例pSS-ILD患者中,32.72%(53/162)患有呼吸道感染。最常见的ILD类型是非特异性间质性肺炎(32.08%,51/159),最常见的病原体类型是细菌(64.25%,34/53)。感染组ESSDAI水平较高(P<0.001),CRP(P<0.001),ESR(P=0.003),和C3(P=0.020),但DLCO-SB水平较低(P=0.015)。单因素Logistic模型显示,PAH和糖皮质激素的使用增加了pSS-ILD患者的感染风险。在多元逻辑回归分析中,PAH(OR=3.993,95%CI=1.192-13.373,P=0.025)和DLCO严重减少(DLCO-SB<40%,OR=4.625,95%CI=1.281-16.702,P=0.019)与pSS-ILD患者呼吸道感染风险增加显着相关。
    结论:在pSS-ILD患者中,最常见的ILD类型是非特异性间质性肺炎.在感染患者中,细菌是最常见的病原体。更高水平的ESSDAI,CRP,ESR,和C3可能与感染风险增加相关。PAH和DLCO减少是独立的危险因素。要点•ILD和传染病严重影响pSS患者状况。•更高水平的ESSDAI,CRP,ESR,C3可能与pSS-ILD感染风险增加有关。•PAH和DLCO减少被确定为下呼吸道感染的独立危险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical and laboratory characteristics of primary Sjögren\'s syndrome (pSS) complicated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and investigate the risk factors for respiratory infections in pSS-ILD.
    METHODS: A cohort of 162 pSS-ILD patients in Peking University People\'s Hospital from 2015 to 2020 were included, and all medical records were completely collected. We screened 53 patients suffering from respiratory infections as study cases, compared with 109 age- and sex-matched controls. Differences between infection group and control group were compared. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression tests were conducted to identify potential risk factors for respiratory infections in pSS-ILD patients.
    RESULTS: Among 162 pSS-ILD patients, 32.72% (53/162) suffered from respiratory infections. The most frequent type of ILD was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (32.08%, 51/159), and the most common type of pathogen was bacteria (64.25%, 34/53). Infection group showed higher levels of ESSDAI (P < 0.001), CRP (P < 0.001), ESR (P = 0.003), and C3 (P = 0.020) but lower level of DLCO-SB (P = 0.015). Univariate logistic model revealed that PAH and the use of glucocorticoid increased infection risk in pSS-ILD patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, PAH (OR = 3.993, 95% CI = 1.192-13.373, P = 0.025) and severe reduction of DLCO (DLCO-SB < 40%, OR = 4.625, 95% CI = 1.281-16.702, P = 0.019) were significantly associated with increased risk of respiratory infections in pSS-ILD patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among pSS-ILD patients, the most frequent type of ILD was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. In patients with infection, bacteria were the most common pathogen. Higher levels of ESSDAI, CRP, ESR, and C3 may be correlated with increased infection risk. PAH and reduction of DLCO were identified as independent risk factors. Key Points • ILD and infectious diseases severely affect pSS patient conditions. • Higher levels of ESSDAI, CRP, ESR, and C3 may be correlated with increased infection risks in pSS-ILD. • PAH and reduction of DLCO were identified as independent risk factors for lower respiratory infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者及其家属对间质性肺病(ILD)的信息需求尚未详细研究,很少有报告根据患者状态检查信息需求的差异。这项研究旨在确定门诊患者与家庭护理人员之间的信息需求是否存在差异,以及这些差异是否取决于长期氧疗的使用。
    方法:在2020年2月至2022年3月期间访问京都大学医院的纤维化ILD患者及其家人被招募用于这项描述性研究。纤维化ILD包括特发性肺纤维化(IPF),IPF以外的其他特发性间质性肺炎(IIPs),结缔组织疾病相关ILD(CTD-ILD),和纤维化过敏性肺炎.数据来自电子病历和问卷调查。进行描述性数据分析。
    结果:对65例患者及其家庭照顾者进行分析。27名(41.5%)患者患有IIP(IPF9和其他IIP18),34人(52.3%)患有CTD-ILD,4例(6.2%)患有纤维化过敏性肺炎.患者与家人之间最常见的关系是配偶(67.7%),80%的人一起生活。患者及其家庭护理人员的主要信息需求在三级之前是常见的,但与其他人不同。患者对“何时何地联系医疗保健提供者”和“临终护理和高级指令”感兴趣,而家庭护理人员对“饮食和营养”和“在家的护理和支持”感兴趣。长期氧疗的患者对“临终关怀和高级指令”和“如何控制呼吸困难”的需求更高,咳嗽,和疲劳,“而对“ILD药物”和“ILD急性加重”的需求相对较低。在长期氧疗组中,家庭护理人员对“饮食和营养”感兴趣,在不长期氧疗组中,家庭护理人员对“ILD急性加重”感兴趣。
    结论:这项研究发现,患者及其家庭照顾者的信息需求并不相同,并且信息需求方面因长期氧疗状态而异。医疗保健提供者应该考虑信息接受者的位置,根据病人的情况,适当的时间,和必要的信息。
    BACKGROUND: The information needs of patients and their families regarding interstitial lung disease (ILD) have yet to be studied in detail, and few reports have examined the differences in information needs according to patient status. This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in information needs between outpatients with ILD and their family caregivers and whether these differences depend on long-term oxygen therapy use.
    METHODS: Patients with fibrotic ILDs and their families who visited Kyoto University Hospital between February 2020 and March 2022 were recruited for this descriptive study. Fibrotic ILDs included idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) than IPF, connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia. Data were obtained from electronic patient records and questionnaires. Descriptive data analyses were performed.
    RESULTS: Sixty-five patients and their family caregivers were analyzed. Twenty-seven (41.5%) patients had IIPs (IPF 9 and other IIPs 18), 34 (52.3%) had CTD-ILD, and 4 (6.2%) had fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia. The most common relationship between the patient and their family was a spouse (67.7%), with 80% living together. The primary information needs among patients and their family caregivers were common up to the third rank but differed from the rest. Patients were interested in \"when and where to contact health care providers\" and \"end-of-life care and advanced directives,\" while family caregivers were interested in \"diet and nutrition\" and \"care and support at home.\" Patients with long-term oxygen therapy had higher needs for \"end-of-life care and advanced directives\" and \"how to manage breathlessness, cough, and fatigue,\" while the needs for \"drugs for ILD\" and \"acute exacerbation of ILD\" were relatively low. Family caregivers were interested in \"diet and nutrition\" in the long-term oxygen therapy group and \"acute exacerbation of ILD\" in the no long-term oxygen therapy group.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the information needs of patients and their family caregivers were not the same and that the aspect of information needs differed by long-term oxygen therapy status. Healthcare providers should consider the position of the recipient of information, the appropriate time based on the patient\'s condition, and the necessary information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:特发性间质性肺炎是肺癌的独立危险因素,化疗引起的急性加重是日本患者最常见的致命并发症。卡铂和每周紫杉醇治疗非小细胞肺癌合并特发性间质性肺炎的安全性和有效性先前已在前瞻性研究中报道。然而,卡铂+紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗是目前的标准疗法.我们进行了一个多中心,II期研究证实卡铂+每周紫杉醇+贝伐单抗治疗肺癌并发特发性间质性肺炎患者的安全性和有效性。
    方法:纳入化疗初治晚期患者或术后复发性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌并发特发性间质性肺炎患者。患者在每个4周周期的第1天接受卡铂(曲线下面积:5.0)和贝伐单抗(15mg/kg),并在第1、8和15天接受紫杉醇(100mg/m2)。
    结果:纳入少于预定人数的17名患者,中位接受4个治疗周期(范围:1-6)。一名患者(5.9%;95%置信区间:0.1-28.7%)与研究治疗相关的间质性肺炎急性加重,皮质类固醇治疗后改善。总有效率为52.9%。中位无进展生存期,中位生存时间,1年生存期为5.7个月,12.9个月,和52.9%,分别。
    结论:在卡铂基础上加用贝伐单抗和每周一次的紫杉醇治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌合并特发性间质性肺炎可能是安全有效的。
    背景:UMIN000008189.
    BACKGROUND: Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias are an independent risk factor of lung cancer, and a chemotherapy-induced acute exacerbation is the most common lethal complication in Japanese patients. The safety and efficacy of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias has been previously reported in prospective studies. However, carboplatin + paclitaxel with bevacizumab is currently the standard therapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase II study to confirm the safety and efficacy of carboplatin + weekly paclitaxel + bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.
    METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced-stage or patients with post-operative recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias were enrolled. Patients received carboplatin (area under the curve: 5.0) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 and paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 4-week cycle.
    RESULTS: Seventeen patients less than the predetermined number were enrolled and received a median of four treatment cycles (range: 1-6). One patient (5.9%; 95% confidence interval: 0.1-28.7%) had acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia related to the study treatment which improved after corticosteroid treatment. The overall response rate was 52.9%. The median progression-free survival, median survival time, and 1-year survival were 5.7 months, 12.9 months, and 52.9%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel might be safe and effective for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.
    BACKGROUND: UMIN000008189.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了确定患病率,临床特征,危险因素,原发性干燥综合征(pSS)患者间质性肺病(ILD)的预后。
    方法:回顾了2013年8月至2022年8月274例pSS患者的数据。揭示了pSS合并ILD的临床特征。采用Logistic回归分析pSS患者发生ILD的危险因素。采用生存分析和Cox回归分析pSS患者的预后及影响预后的因素。
    结果:在pSS患者中,ILD的患病率为22.3%(61/274).患有ILD的pSS患者的特点是发病晚、病程长,非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)模式是主要的高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)发现。Logistic回归结果显示年龄大于50岁(OR4.786,95%CI1.602-14.299;P=0.005),紫癜性皮疹(OR4.695,95%CI1.537-14.339;P=0.007),AMA-M2抗体阳性(OR2.582,95%CI1.166-5.722;P=0.019),糖尿病(OR2.514,95%CI1.025-6.167;P=0.044)是pSS患者ILD的危险因素。Cox回归结果显示,高龄(HR1.240,95%CI1.088-1.413;P=0.001)和癌症病史(HR8.411,95%CI1.771-39.934;P=0.007)是影响pSS患者生存的危险因素。
    结论:这项研究表明,患有ILD的pSS患者倾向于pSS起病晚,病程长。年龄超过50岁,紫癜性皮疹,AMA-M2抗体阳性,糖尿病是pSS患者ILD的危险因素。高龄和癌症病史是pSS患者的预后因素。要点•这项研究表明,患有ILD的pSS患者倾向于出现迟发且病程较长的pSS,以NSIP模式为主要肺部图像。•本研究中确定的pSS患者ILD的危险因素是年龄超过50岁,紫癜性皮疹,AMA-M2抗体阳性,和糖尿病。•pSS患者的预后危险因素是高龄和癌症史。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, clinical features, risk factors, and prognosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with primary Sjogren\'s syndrome (pSS).
    METHODS: Data from 274 pSS patients from August 2013 to August 2022 were reviewed. The clinical features of pSS with ILD were revealed. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for ILD in pSS patients. Survival analysis and Cox regression were used to analyse the prognosis and prognostic factors of pSS patients.
    RESULTS: In pSS patients, the prevalence of ILD was 22.3% (61/274). The pSS patients with ILD were characterized by a late onset and long disease course, with a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern as the predominant high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) finding. Logistic regression results indicated that an age over 50 years old (OR 4.786, 95% CI 1.602-14.299; P = 0.005), purpuric rash (OR 4.695, 95% CI 1.537-14.339; P = 0.007), AMA-M2 antibody positivity (OR 2.582, 95% CI 1.166-5.722; P = 0.019), and diabetes (OR 2.514, 95% CI 1.025-6.167; P = 0.044) were risk factors for ILD in pSS patients. Cox regression results showed that advanced age (HR 1.240, 95% CI 1.088-1.413; P = 0.001) and cancer history (HR 8.411, 95% CI 1.771-39.934; P = 0.007) were risk factors for pSS patient survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that pSS patients with ILD tended to have a late onset and long course of pSS. An age over 50 years, purpuric rash, AMA-M2 antibody positivity, and diabetes were risk factors for ILD in pSS patients. Advanced age and cancer history were prognostic factors in pSS patients. Key Points • This study showed that pSS patients with ILD tended to have a late-onset and lengthy course of pSS, with the NSIP pattern as the predominant lung image. • The risk factors for ILD in pSS patients determined in this study were an age over 50 years, purpuric rash, AMA-M2 antibody positivity, and diabetes. • The prognostic risk factors for pSS patients were advanced age and cancer history.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间质性肺病(ILD),如特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP),慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)严重,预后不良的进行性肺部疾病。及时和准确的诊断对于使患者能够在尽可能早的阶段接受适当的护理以延缓疾病进展和延长生存期是重要的。人工智能辅助肺部听诊和超声(LUS)可以替代传统的,主观,与操作员相关的方法,用于准确和早期诊断这些疾病。该协议描述了成人IPF门诊患者的数字采集肺音和LUS图像的标准化收集,NSIP或COPD以及深度学习诊断和严重程度分层方法。
    方法:共120例符合IPF国际标准的连续患者(≥18岁),NSIP或COPD和40名年龄匹配的对照将在瑞士肺科门诊诊所招募,从2022年8月开始。在纳入时,将收集人口统计学和临床数据.肺部听诊将用数字听诊器在每个患者的10个胸部部位进行记录,并且使用标准护理点设备的LUS图像将在相同部位进行采集。一种使用卷积神经网络的深度学习算法(DeepBreath),长期短期记忆模型,和变压器架构将在这些音频记录和LUS图像上进行培训,以获得自动诊断工具。主要结果是ILD相对于对照受试者或COPD的诊断。次要结果是临床,IPF的功能和放射学特征,NSIP和COPD诊断。生活质量将通过专用问卷进行测量。根据以往区分正常和病理性肺音的工作,我们估计每个类别中使用40名患者的接受者工作特征曲线下的面积>80%,产生80ILD(40IPF,40NSIP),40COPD,40个控制
    结论:这种方法具有广泛的潜力,可以通过探索几种护理点测试对ILD和COPD的自动检测和鉴别诊断以及评估严重程度的协同价值,更好地指导护理管理。试用注册注册:2022年8月8日。
    结果:gov标识符:NCT05318599。
    BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD), such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are severe, progressive pulmonary disorders with a poor prognosis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is important to enable patients to receive appropriate care at the earliest possible stage to delay disease progression and prolong survival. Artificial intelligence-assisted lung auscultation and ultrasound (LUS) could constitute an alternative to conventional, subjective, operator-related methods for the accurate and earlier diagnosis of these diseases. This protocol describes the standardised collection of digitally-acquired lung sounds and LUS images of adult outpatients with IPF, NSIP or COPD and a deep learning diagnostic and severity-stratification approach.
    METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients (≥ 18 years) meeting international criteria for IPF, NSIP or COPD and 40 age-matched controls will be recruited in a Swiss pulmonology outpatient clinic, starting from August 2022. At inclusion, demographic and clinical data will be collected. Lung auscultation will be recorded with a digital stethoscope at 10 thoracic sites in each patient and LUS images using a standard point-of-care device will be acquired at the same sites. A deep learning algorithm (DeepBreath) using convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory models, and transformer architectures will be trained on these audio recordings and LUS images to derive an automated diagnostic tool. The primary outcome is the diagnosis of ILD versus control subjects or COPD. Secondary outcomes are the clinical, functional and radiological characteristics of IPF, NSIP and COPD diagnosis. Quality of life will be measured with dedicated questionnaires. Based on previous work to distinguish normal and pathological lung sounds, we estimate to achieve convergence with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of > 80% using 40 patients in each category, yielding a sample size calculation of 80 ILD (40 IPF, 40 NSIP), 40 COPD, and 40 controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: This approach has a broad potential to better guide care management by exploring the synergistic value of several point-of-care-tests for the automated detection and differential diagnosis of ILD and COPD and to estimate severity. Trial registration Registration: August 8, 2022.
    RESULTS: gov Identifier: NCT05318599.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:间质性肺病(ILD)合并非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)模式的治疗标准建议将霉酚酸酯(MMF)作为第一步疗法之一,而利妥昔单抗用作抢救疗法。
    方法:在随机的,双盲,双平行组,安慰剂对照试验(NCT02990286),有结缔组织疾病相关性ILD或特发性间质性肺炎(有或无自身免疫特征)和NSIP模式(根据NSIP病理模式或临床生物学数据整合和NSIP样HRCT模式定义)的患者以1∶1的比例随机分组,在第1天和第15天接受利妥昔单抗(1000mg,每日2g)或安慰剂治疗6个月.主要终点是预测的强制肺活量(FVC)从基线到6个月的百分比变化,通过线性混合模型进行重复测量分析。次要终点包括6个月的无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。
    结果:在2017年1月至2019年1月之间,122名随机患者接受了至少一剂利妥昔单抗(n=63)或安慰剂(n=59)。从基线到6个月FVC的最小二乘平均变化(预测百分比)在利妥昔单抗MMF组中为+1.60(se1.13),在安慰剂MMF组中为-2.01(se1.17)(组间差异,3.60[95%CI0.41至6.80];p=0.0273)。利妥昔单抗+MMF组的PFS更好(粗HR0.47[95CI0.23至0.96];p=0.03)。利妥昔单抗+MMF组26例(41%)和安慰剂+MMF组23例(39%)发生严重不良事件。在利妥昔单抗+MMF组中报告了9种感染(5种细菌感染,3病毒感染,1个其他)和安慰剂+MMF组中的4个细菌感染。
    结论:在ILD和NSIP模式患者中,利妥昔单抗和MMF的组合优于单独MMF。使用这种组合必须考虑病毒感染的风险。
    Standard of care for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern proposes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as one of the first-step therapies while rituximab is used as rescue therapy.
    In a randomised, double-blind, two-parallel group, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02990286), patients with connective tissue disease-associated ILD or idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (with or without autoimmune features) and a NSIP pattern (defined on NSIP pathological pattern or on integration of clinicobiological data and a NSIP-like high-resolution computed tomography pattern) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rituximab (1000 mg) or placebo on day 1 and day 15 in addition to MMF (2 g daily) for 6 months. The primary end-point was the change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to 6 months analysed by a linear mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) up to 6 months and safety.
    Between January 2017 and January 2019, 122 randomised patients received at least one dose of rituximab (n=63) or placebo (n=59). The least-squares mean change from baseline to 6 months in FVC (% predicted) was +1.60 (se 1.13) in the rituximab+MMF group and -2.01 (se 1.17) in the placebo+MMF group (between-group difference 3.60, 95% CI 0.41-6.80; p=0.0273). PFS was better in the rituximab+MMF group (crude hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96; p=0.03). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 (41%) patients of the rituximab+MMF group and in 23 (39%) of the placebo+MMF group. Nine infections were reported in the rituximab+MMF group (five bacterial infections, three viral infections, one other) and four bacterial infections in the placebo+MMF group.
    Combination of rituximab and MMF was superior to MMF alone in patients with ILD and a NSIP pattern. The use of this combination must take into consideration the risk of viral infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号