Human-Animal Bond

人与动物的纽带
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在老年社会工作领域,人们越来越有兴趣进一步探索和理解人与动物的联系和关系,这一趋势在COVID-19大流行的早期显著加速。社区组织是有前途的合作伙伴,因为它们为老年人与宠物的关系以及加强人与动物的联系提供认可和支持。这份简短的报告讨论了历史,影响,以及一个社区组织一年一度的情人节活动的潜力,心连心。在COVID-19大流行的高峰期由大拉斐特(AAGL)的动物倡导者发起,印第安纳州的社区组织,心连心承认,庆祝,并通过将宠物礼物直接送到老年人家中来支持老年人与宠物的联系。尽管越来越多的证据表明宠物为所有年龄段的人提供支持和舒适,但尤其是老年人,为老年人服务的社会服务机构和计划通常不愿意承认人与动物联系的力量。心连心让我们的社区看到和欣赏这些关系的力量,有助于新的对话和可能性,使宠物和人在整个生命周期中保持在一起。
    In the field of gerontological social work, there is growing interest in further exploring and understanding human-animal bonds and relationships, a trend that accelerated significantly during the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Community-based organizations are promising partners as they provide acknowledgment and support for older adults\' relationships with their pets and the strengthening of the human-animal bond. This brief report discusses the history, impact, and potential of one community-based organization\'s annual Valentine\'s Day event, Heart to Heart. Initiated at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic by Animal Advocates of Greater Lafayette (AAGL), an Indiana-based community organization, Heart to Heart recognizes, celebrates, and supports older adults\' bonds with their pets through delivering pet presents directly to older adults\' homes. Despite the mounting evidence that pets provide support and comfort for people of all ages, but particularly older adults, social service agencies and programs that serve older adults are often reluctant to recognize the power of the human-animal bond. Heart to Heart allows our community to see and appreciate the strength of these relationships, contributing to new conversations and possibilities for keeping pets and people together through the lifespan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体不活动水平的增加是人类的全球负担,也是伴侣狗的一个新兴问题。在人类和狗中,身体活动不足与非传染性疾病风险增加和生活质量(QoL)受损相关.当前试点研究的目的是评估联合户外运动计划对狗主人(n=22)和狗(n=22)的影响,重点是QoL和身体测量。结果表明,仅进行为期八周的运动干预,目标距离每周至少2公里,尽管身体测量值没有减少,但仍足以显着提高自我报告的QoL和狗主人对身体外观的接受度。在狗中,记录了显着降低的身体状况评分(BCS),尽管喂养没有相当大的变化。所有者继续进行联合锻炼的动机增加表明了生活方式改变的潜力,这可以在未来的研究中进行调查,包括对照组和长期随访。建议以更深入的方式研究人与动物之间的联系作为增加狗主人和狗的相互身体活动和健康益处的成功因素的重要性。
    Increasing levels of physical inactivity is a global burden for mankind and is also an emerging problem in companion dogs. In both humans and dogs, insufficient physical activity is associated with increased risk for noncommunicable diseases and impaired quality of life (QoL). The aim of the current pilot study was to evaluate effects of a joint outdoor exercise program for dog owners (n = 22) and dogs (n = 22) with focus on QoL and body measurements. Results indicate that an eight-week exercise intervention alone, with a target distance of at least 2 km twice a week, may be sufficient to significantly increase self-reported QoL and acceptance of bodily appearance in dog owners despite no reductions in body measurements. In dogs, a significantly reduced body condition score (BCS) was registered, despite no considerable changes in feeding. The increased owner motivation for continued joint exercise suggests potential for lifestyle changes, which could be investigated in future studies including control groups and long-term follow-ups. The importance of the human-animal bond as a success factor for increased mutual physical activity and health benefits in both dog owners and dogs is recommended to be studied in a more in-depth manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动物收容所的寄养计划已成为促进动物福利和支持收容所挽救生命的重要工具。初步证据表明,寄养照料也可能促进人类的健康。这项研究的目的是调查在动物收容所寄养照顾者的经验,基于积极和消极影响的措施,生活质量,和悲伤,并描述寄养人群中的人与动物依恋。在2022年3月至2023年之间,来自美国五个庇护所的131名寄养者之前完成了三项在线调查,在为收容所的动物提供寄养期间和之后。从基线到寄养后,积极影响显着降低(F=5.71,p<0.01),特别是在狗的照顾者(F=6.17,p<0.01)。负面影响保持不变(F=0.47,p=0.63)。寄养者认为他们的寄养动物提供了陪伴,感情和情感支持,尽管狗寄养的看护人报告的情绪(U=313.50,p<0.01)和社会/身体生活质量(t=4.42,p<0.01)明显高于猫寄养的看护人。照顾者报告平均回避和焦虑依恋较低,表明他们能够与寄养动物建立安全的联系。福斯特的保留也很强,86%的看护人报告说他们将来可能会提供寄养服务.我们的研究结果表明,在动物收容所进行的寄养可能是一种“单一健康”干预措施,以提供陪伴,在促进动物福利的同时,对人类照顾者的情感和情感支持。然而,这些好处并没有转化为改善护理人员的心理健康,因此,在考虑将寄养照料作为潜在的心理健康促进工具时,应谨慎行事。
    Foster care programs at animal shelters have emerged as an important tool for promoting animal welfare and supporting shelter life-saving efforts. Preliminary evidence suggests that foster caregiving may also be health-promoting for humans. The goals of this study were to investigate the experiences of foster caregivers at animal shelters based on measures of positive and negative affect, quality of life, and grief, and to describe human-animal attachment among foster populations. Between March 2022 and 2023, 131 foster caregivers from five shelters in the United States completed three online surveys before, during and after providing foster care to a shelter animal. Positive affect decreased significantly from baseline to post-foster (F = 5.71, p<0.01), particularly among dog caregivers (F = 6.17, p<0.01). Negative affect remained unchanged (F = 0.47, p = 0.63). Foster caregivers perceived their foster animal provided companionship, affection and emotional support, although dog foster caregivers reported significantly higher emotional (U = 313.50, p<0.01) and social/physical quality of life (t = 4.42, p<0.01) than cat foster caregivers. Caregivers reported low mean avoidant and anxious attachment, suggesting they were able to develop secure bonds with their foster animals. Retention of fosters was also strong, with 86% of caregivers reporting they were likely to provide foster care in the future. Our findings suggest that fostering at animal shelters may serve as a One Health intervention to offer companionship, affection and emotional support to human caregivers while promoting animal welfare. However, these benefits did not translate to improvements in caregiver mental wellbeing, so caution should be applied when considering foster caregiving as a potential mental health promotion tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究指出了主人个性与对宠物的依恋强度之间的关系,对心理健康有影响。到目前为止,这方面的研究,尽管稀疏,专注于所有者个性的“五大特征”。“黑暗三合会”是一系列特征,也与情感缺陷有关,但在宠物依恋方面却被忽视了。因此,这项研究检查了主人个性和宠物依恋之间的关系,专注于“五大”和“黑暗三合会”的人格特质。
    在2023年5月至6月之间,采用了横截面设计来收集全球狗和猫主人的定量数据。一项专门设计的在线调查收集了社会人口统计细节,连同宠物所有权的信息,宠物主人纽带和参与者个性的力量,使用大五人格量表和短黑暗三合会量表进行评估。这项调查由759只狗和179只猫的主人完成。
    分析显示,许多参与者的人格特质之间存在显着相关性,范围内和范围之间。宠物依恋强度与神经质和责任心呈正相关,and,更弱,马基雅维利主义。回归分析显示,女性,狗主人,50岁以上的人和有18岁以下儿童需要照顾的人比其他人更喜欢他们的宠物。发现神经质和责任心都是参与者宠物依恋得分的重要预测因子。黑暗三合会特征均未显着预测该标准。
    这项研究指出了对宠物的依恋强度与主人性格之间的关系,至少使用五大人格评估方法来衡量。没有什么可以支持黑暗三合会特征和对宠物的依恋强度之间的联系,尽管这些特征和依恋风格之间的联系仍然未知。这项调查支持了这样一种观点,即高依恋水平与心理疾病的人格特质相关。建议在这方面做进一步的工作,更加注重强度和质量(例如,宠物主人债券的附件样式)。
    UNASSIGNED: Research points to a relationship between owner personality and strength of attachment to one\'s pet, with implications for psychological health. So far, studies in this area, albeit sparse, have focused on the \'Big Five\' traits of owner personality. The \'Dark Triad\' is a cluster of traits that has also been linked to emotional deficits, but has been overlooked in relation to pet attachment. This study therefore examined the association between owner personality and pet attachment, focusing on both the \'Big Five\' and \'Dark Triad\' traits of personality.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional design was employed to collect quantitative data from dog and cat owners across the globe between May-June 2023. A purpose-designed online survey collected sociodemographic details, along with information on pet ownership, strength of the pet-owner bond and participant personality, assessed using the Big Five personality scale and the Short Dark Triad scale. The survey was fully completed by 759 dog and 179 cat owners.
    UNASSIGNED: Analysis revealed significant correlations between many of the participants\' personality traits, both within and between scales. Strength of pet attachment was positively correlated with neuroticism and conscientiousness, and, more weakly, to Machiavellianism. Regression analysis revealed that females, dog owners, people over the age of 50 and individuals who had children under 18 years to care for were more strongly attached to their pets than others. Both neuroticism and conscientiousness were found to be significant predictors of participants\' pet attachment scores. None of the Dark Triad traits significantly predicted the criterion.
    UNASSIGNED: This study points to a relationship between strength of attachment to one\'s pet and owner personality, at least as measured using the Big Five approach to personality assessment. There was little to support an association between the Dark Triad traits and strength of attachment to one\'s pet, although the link between these characteristics and attachment styles is still unknown. The investigation lends support for the idea that high attachment levels are associated with personality traits aligned to psychological ill-health. Further work is recommended in this area, with a greater focus on both strength and quality (e.g., attachment style) of the pet-owner bond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以前已经证明狗与主人的行为同步,这项研究的目的是测试即时互动的效果。品种,以及驯化的影响。行为同步测试在室外围栏中进行,包括所有者/处理者行走的30秒和静止的30秒。进行了三项研究以探索即时相互作用的影响(研究A),品种组的影响(研究B),以及驯化的影响(研究C)。在研究A中,一组二十只不同品种的伴侣犬在三种不同的人类相互作用处理后进行了测试:忽略,宠物,和玩。结果表明,狗调整他们的运动模式,以符合他们的主人的行动,无论治疗。此外,探索,眼神接触,和运动都受到业主移动模式的影响,游戏治疗后,探索也减少了。在研究B中,在Ignore治疗后,对三组进行了同步测试:24只古老犬种的狗,17只孤独的猎犬,和20只伴侣狗(来自研究A的数据)。无论小组如何,所有的狗都将他们的移动行为与主人同步。此外,人类行走对目光接触行为有积极影响,同时减少探索行为。在研究C中,在Ignore治疗后,对一组六只社会化的群居狼和六只类似的社会化群居狗进行了测试。有趣的是,这些动物并没有改变他们的行为,以回应他们的处理。总之,与人类生活在一起的狗与主人的移动行为同步,而狼群和狗则没有。因此,种间行为同步的程度可能受到狗与人类一起沉浸在日常生活中的程度的影响。
    Dogs have previously been shown to synchronise their behaviour with their owner and the aim of this study was to test the effect of immediate interactions, breed, and the effects of domestication. The behavioural synchronisation test was conducted in outdoor enclosures and consisted of 30 s where the owner/handler was walking and 30 s of standing still. Three studies were conducted to explore the effect of immediate interaction (study A), the effect of breed group (study B), and the effect of domestication (study C). In study A, a group of twenty companion dogs of various breeds were tested after three different human interaction treatments: Ignore, Pet, and Play. The results showed that dogs adjusted their movement pattern to align with their owner\'s actions regardless of treatment. Furthermore, exploration, eye contact, and movement were all influenced by the owners moving pattern, and exploration also decreased after the Play treatment. In study B, the synchronisation test was performed after the Ignore treatment on three groups: 24 dogs of ancient dog breeds, 17 solitary hunting dogs, and 20 companion dogs (data from study A). Irrespective of the group, all dogs synchronised their moving behaviour with their owner. In addition, human walking positively influenced eye contact behaviour while simultaneously decreasing exploration behaviour. In study C, a group of six socialised pack-living wolves and six similarly socialised pack-living dogs were tested after the Ignore treatment. Interestingly, these animals did not alter their moving behaviour in response to their handler. In conclusion, dogs living together with humans synchronise with their owner\'s moving behaviour, while wolves and dogs living in packs do not. Hence, the degree of interspecies behavioural synchronisation may be influenced by the extent to which the dogs are immersed in everyday life with humans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当在测试之前用社交刺激进行预处理时,在食物偏好任务中,狗更容易受到人类影响。这意味着,在积极的社会互动之后,他们更愿意选择人类所指示的少量食物,与他们对更大金额的基线偏好相反。在当前的研究中,我们调查了各种形式的社会互动是否以及如何在同一社会易感性任务中调节选择,测试具有不同早期生活史的狗(宠物狗,治疗犬,以前的收容所狗)。根据以前的研究,一般来说,狗容易受到人类影响,这反映在人类影响中“更大”选择的数量减少,与基线相比,试验。这不仅适用于有正常生活史的宠物狗,也适用于从收容所收养的狗。治疗犬,然而,在人类影响试验中,他们并没有统一改变他们对更大量食物的偏好;只有在测试之前,他们已经被主人(但不是陌生人)用社交刺激进行了预处理,他们才这样做。与忽略和分离相比,宠物狗在主人进行社交刺激预处理后受到的影响更大;但是,在陌生人进行预处理后,他们的行为与忽略和分离没有区别。另一方面,无论主人还是陌生人的预处理,前收容所的狗都受到同样的影响。总之,这些结果表明,狗的社会易感性受到测试前的相互作用以及长期的社会经验的调节。
    When pre-treated with social stimuli prior to testing, dogs are more susceptible to human influence in a food preference task. This means, after a positive social interaction they are more willing to choose the smaller amount of food indicated by the human, as opposed to their baseline preference for the bigger amount. In the current study we investigate if and how various forms of social interaction modulate choices in the same social susceptibility task, testing dogs with varying early life history (pet dogs, therapy dogs, former shelter dogs). In line with previous studies, dogs in general were found to be susceptible to human influence as reflected in the reduced number of \"bigger\" choices in the human influence, compared to baseline, trials. This was true not only for pet dogs with a normal life history, but also for dogs adopted from a shelter. Therapy dogs, however, did not uniformly change their preference for the bigger quantity of food in the human influence trials; they only did so if prior to testing they had been pre-treated with social stimuli by their owner (but not by a stranger). Pet dogs were also more influenced after pre-treatment with social stimuli by their owner compared to ignoring and separation; however after pre-treatment by a stranger their behaviour did not differ from ignoring and separation. Former shelter dogs on the other hand were equally influenced regardless of pre-treatment by owner versus stranger. In summary these results show that dogs\' social susceptibility is modulated by both interactions immediately preceding the test as well as by long term social experiences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号