背景:难民重新安置和融入新社区的过程是一个复杂和多方面的挑战,不仅为难民自己,也为参与寄宿家庭住房安排的寄宿家庭。虽然这些寄宿家庭安排旨在促进更顺利的过渡和提高难民的福祉,这些互动的细微差别动态及其对难民及其收容家庭的总体影响仍未得到充分探索。了解难民及其收容家庭的经历对于有效的难民安置至关重要,一体化,和幸福。然而,错综复杂的寄宿难民收容,他们与寄宿家庭的互动,对他们福祉的影响仍然不清楚和模糊。
目的:本范围审查的目的是研究有关难民与寄宿家庭一起居住在寄宿家庭中的经历的广泛文献。这篇评论旨在了解这些动态如何影响难民的福祉,包括他们的融合,社会关系,和心理健康。此外,这篇范围界定综述旨在综合现有的关于寄宿家庭托管动态的文献,关注难民及其收容家庭的经历,找出知识差距,并提出未来研究的领域。
方法:此范围审查遵循JoannaBriggsInstitute方法,并将搜索诸如CINAHL之类的数据库,SOCIndex,MEDLINE通过EBSCO;APAPsycInfo,Scopus通过OVID;和WebofScience核心合集,ProQuest论文,和论文,和SciELO引文索引,从2011年开始专注于文学,在英语中,关于不同东道国的难民群体,包括所有类型的文学。文学将由两名独立审稿人筛选,通过协商一致或第三审稿人解决分歧。研究团队将创建一个自定义数据提取工具。
结果:结果将以表格或图表的形式组织,伴随着叙事概述,强调与寄宿家庭和难民福祉的寄宿家庭托管动态相关的主要综合调查结果。不会进行批判性评估。这项范围界定审查预计将确定研究差距,这些差距将为寄宿难民收容模式的发展提供信息,政策,和实践。它还将提供有关最佳实践和政策建议的见解,以改善寄宿家庭托管计划,最终有助于更有效的难民安置和融合战略。
结论:了解寄宿家庭托管安排的复杂动态对于制定支持难民及其寄宿家庭福祉的政策和计划至关重要。这项范围界定审查将阐明当前的知识格局,确定研究差距,并建议如何增强所有相关方的寄宿家庭托管体验。通过这项工作,我们的目标是促进更具包容性的发展,支持,以及收容难民的有效方法,重新安置,和融合。
■DERR1-10.2196/56242。
BACKGROUND: The process of refugee resettlement and integration into new communities is a complex and multifaceted challenge, not only for the refugees themselves but also for the host families involved in homestay housing arrangements. While these homestay arrangements are designed to facilitate smoother transitions and enhance the well-being of refugees, the nuanced dynamics of these interactions and their overall impact on both refugees and their host families remain underexplored. Understanding the experiences of refugees and their host families is vital for effective refugee settlement, integration, and well-being. However, the intricacies of homestay refugee hosting, their interactions with host families, and the impact on their well-being are still unclear and ambiguous.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review is to examine the breadth of literature on the experiences of refugees living in homestay arrangements with their host families. This review seeks to understand how these dynamics influence refugee well-being, including their integration, social connections, and mental health. Additionally, this scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature on homestay hosting dynamics, focusing on the experiences of refugees and their host families, to identify gaps in knowledge and suggest areas for future research.
METHODS: This scoping review follows Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and will search databases such as CINAHL, SOCIndex, MEDLINE through EBSCO; APA PsycInfo, Scopus through OVID; and Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest Dissertations, and Theses, and SciELO Citation Index, focusing on literature from 2011 onward, in English, in relation to refugee groups in different host countries, including all types of literature. Literature will be screened by 2 independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. A custom data extraction tool will be created by the research team.
RESULTS: The results will be organized in tables or diagrams, accompanied by a narrative overview, emphasizing the main synthesized findings related to the dynamics of homestay hosting with host families and refugee well-being. No critical appraisal will be conducted. This scoping review is expected to identify research gaps that will inform the development of homestay refugee hosting models, policies, and practices. It will also offer insights into best practices and policy recommendations to improve homestay hosting programs, ultimately contributing to more effective refugee settlement and integration strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the intricate dynamics of homestay hosting arrangements is crucial for developing policies and programs that support the well-being of refugees and the families that host them. This scoping review will shed light on the current knowledge landscape, identify research gaps, and suggest ways to enhance the homestay hosting experience for all parties involved. Through this work, we aim to contribute to the development of more inclusive, supportive, and effective approaches to refugee hosting, resettlement, and integration.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/56242.