Gastric volume

胃体积
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术前药物预防在全身麻醉(GA)下预防吸入性肺炎低风险患者吸入性肺炎中的作用仍在争论中。我们通过使用有和没有药理酸吸入预防的超声评估胃体积的变化,解决了在高危人群中常规药理吸入预防的需求。
    单中心,随机双盲试验,有200名成年患者计划在GA下进行择期外科手术,被随机分为预防组,患者口服法莫替丁和甲氧氯普胺,和一个没有预防的组,其中患者没有接受任何预防。通过超声对胃窦体积的预诱导测量得出的胃体积,诱导后胃pH,并比较吸入性肺炎的发生率。Bland-Altman图用于根据计算的胃体积确定测得的胃体积与超声检查之间的一致性水平。
    无预防组的胃窦横截面积(CSA)和体积(3.12cm2和20.11ml,分别)与预防组(2.56cm2和19.67ml,分别)(P值分别为0.97和0.63)。尽管无预防组的胃pH值在统计学上有显着下降(P值0.01),根据Roberts和Shirley标准,增加吸入性肺炎的风险无临床意义(P值0.39).
    在足够禁食的低风险人群中,残余胃体积的量相似,低于抽吸阈值,无论吸入预防状况如何。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing aspiration pneumonitis under general anesthesia (GA) in patients at low risk of aspiration pneumonitis is still under debate. We addressed the need for routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis in at-risk population by assessing the change in gastric volume using ultrasound with and without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis.
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center, randomized double-blinded trial, with 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures under GA, were randomized into a prophylaxis group, in which the patients received oral famotidine and metoclopramide, and a no prophylaxis group, in which the patients did not receive any prophylaxis. Gastric volume derived from preinduction measurement of gastric antral volume by ultrasound, postinduction gastric pH, and incidences of aspiration pneumonitis were compared. Bland-Altman plot was used to determine the level of agreement between measured gastric volume and ultrasonography based on calculated gastric volume.
    UNASSIGNED: The gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the no prophylaxis group (3.12 cm2 and 20.11 ml, respectively) were comparable to the prophylaxis group (2.56 cm2 and 19.67 ml, respectively) (P-values 0.97 and 0.63, respectively). Although there was a statistically significant decrease in gastric pH in the no prophylaxis group (P-value 0.01), it was not clinically significant to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonitis based on Roberts and Shirley criteria (P-value 0.39).
    UNASSIGNED: In an adequately fasted low-risk population, the amount of residual gastric volume was similar and below the aspiration threshold, regardless of the aspiration prophylaxis status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景术前禁食6小时,接受透明液体直到手术2小时是常规做法。富含碳水化合物的液体拮抗分解代谢,据称耐受性更好。这项研究旨在比较富含碳水化合物的饮料对接受普通水择期手术的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的胃容量和血糖控制的影响。方法将240例40~65岁在区域麻醉下择期手术的患者随机分为糖尿病对照,糖尿病研究,非糖尿病控制,和非糖尿病研究。对照组给予白开水400ml,而研究组在手术前两小时接受了溶于400毫升水中的50克葡萄糖。使用USG评估胃体积,使用Likert量表评估口渴和不适。围手术期,使用胰岛素监测和控制血糖值.结果糖尿病对照组的平均胃体积(ml)(35.3±12.95ml),糖尿病研究(31.2±11.75ml),非糖尿病对照(29±11.42ml),与非糖尿病研究(30.4±9.12ml)比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与糖尿病对照组(138.66±15.81mg/dl)相比,摄入液体后两小时的毛细血管血糖(CBG)值显示糖尿病研究中的CBG水平显著增加(183.2±28.67mg/dl)。这些值在6小时内返回到基线。在糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的研究组中,口渴和不适显着降低。结论我们得出结论,碳水化合物负荷不会影响糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的胃体积。然而,糖值确实会增加,这可能需要对糖尿病患者进行每小时的胰岛素检查和给药。
    Background Preoperative fasting for six hours and accepting clear fluids till two hours of surgery is followed as a regular practice. Carbohydrate-rich fluids antagonize catabolism and are claimed to be tolerated better. This study aims to compare the effect of carbohydrate-rich drinks on gastric volume and blood sugar control in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing elective surgery with plain water. Methods Two hundred forty patients aged 40 to 65 undergoing elective surgery under regional anesthesia were randomized into diabetic control, diabetic study, non-diabetic control, and non-diabetic study. Control groups were given 400 ml of plain water, while the study group received 50 grams of dextrose dissolved in 400 ml of water two hours prior to surgery. Gastric volume was evaluated using USG, and thirst and discomfort were assessed using the Likert scale. Perioperatively, blood sugar values were monitored and kept under control using insulin. Results Mean gastric volume (ml) in diabetic control (35.3±12.95 ml), diabetic study (31.2±11.75 ml), non-diabetic control (29±11.42 ml), and non-diabetic study (30.4±9.12 ml) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Capillary blood glucose (CBG) values two hours post fluid intake showed a significant increase in CBG levels in the diabetic study (183.2±28.67 mg/dl) compared to the diabetic control group (138.66±15.81 mg/dl). The values returned to baseline within six hours. Thirst and discomfort were significantly lower in the study group of diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Conclusion We conclude that carbohydrate loading does not affect gastric volume in diabetics and non-diabetics. However, the sugar values do increase which may warrant hourly checking and administration of insulin in diabetics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:探讨胃窦超声检查对剖宫产术前2小时口服300mL碳水化合物后胃排空的影响。并分析孕妇胃排空的危险因素。
    方法:从2020年8月到2021年2月,共有80名患者,22-43岁,体重指数(BMI)<35kg/m2,胎龄≥36周,进入美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状况Ⅰ或Ⅱ,研究对象为北京大学国际医院剖宫产,分为干预组(n=40)和对照组(n=40).在干预组中,22:00后限制固体食物,要求患者在剖宫产前两小时服用300mL碳水化合物。在对照组中,手术前一天晚上22:00后,固体食物和液体摄入受到限制。所有患者均采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术前口渴感和饥饿感。麻醉前以仰卧位和右仰卧位测量胃窦横截面积(CSA),进一步计算两组的胃体积(GV)和胃体积/体重(GV/W)。Perlas在每个患者中进行半定量分级评估。入院时(T0)记录血压和心率,麻醉后5分钟(T1),胎儿分娩后立即(T2)和手术结束时(T3)。记录术中及术后24h恶心呕吐的发生情况。
    结果:每组均排除一例,因为在超声评估期间未明确确定胃窦。在半坐姿,干预组的CSA为(5.07±1.73)cm2。对照组(5.24±1.96)cm2,分别;在右侧卧位,干预组CSA为(7.32±2.17)cm2。对照组(7.25±2.24)cm2,GV为(91.74±32.34)mL与(90.07±31.68)mL,GV/W为(1.27±0.40)mL/kgvs.(1.22±0.41)mL/kg,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PerlasA半定量分级在20例患者中显示为0(51.3%),1/16(41%),干预组3人中有2人(7.7%),22人中有0人(56.4%),1/15(38.5%),对照组2/2(5.1%),PerlasA半定量分级的比例两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对PerlasA半定量2级患者(干预组3例,对照组2例),麻醉前静脉注射甲氧氯普胺0.2mg/kg。在这项研究中没有观察到误吸病例。干预组口渴、饥饿减少(P<0.05)。两组各时间点血压、心率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术中低血压发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术中、术后恶心发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论:胃窦超声检查可为孕妇围手术期胃排空功能评估提供客观依据。手术前两小时摄入300毫升碳水化合物,不会增加GV和反流吸入的风险,并且有助于最小化对患者生理状态的干扰,因此导致更好的临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of gastric antrum ultrasonography in evaluating gastric emptying after oral administration of 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section, and to analyze the risk factors of gastric emptying in pregnant women.
    METHODS: From August 2020 to February 2021, a total of 80 patients, aged 22-43 years, body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2, gestational age≥36 weeks, falling into American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for cesarean sections in Peking University International Hospital were recruited and divided into two groups: the intervention group (n=40)and the control group (n=40). In the intervention group, solid food was restricted after 22:00, the patients were required to take 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section. In the control group, solid food and liquid intake were restricted after 22:00 the night before surgery. All the patients received assessment of preoperative feeling of thirst and starvation with visual analogue scale (VAS). The cross-sectional area (CSA)of gastric antrum was measured in supine position and right supine position before anesthesia, the gastric volume (GV)and the gastric volume/weight(GV/W)of the two groups was further calculated. Perlas A semi-quantitative grading assessments were performed in each patient. The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at admission(T0), 5 minutes after anesthesia (T1), immediately after fetal delivery (T2) and at the end of the surgery (T3). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during the operation and 24 hours after the operation were recorded.
    RESULTS: One case in each group was excluded because the antrum was not clearly identified during the ultrasound assessments. In the semi-sitting position, the CSA was (5.07±1.73) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (5.24±1.96) cm2 in the control group, respectively; in the right lateral decubitus position, CSA was (7.32±2.17) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (7.25±2.24) cm2 in the control group, GV was (91.74±32.34) mL vs. (90.07±31.68) mL, GV/W was (1.27±0.40) mL/kg vs. (1.22±0.41) mL/kg, respectively; all the above showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed 0 in 20 patients (51.3%), 1 in 16 (41%), 2 in 3 (7.7%)in the intervention group and 0 in 22 (56.4%), 1 in 15 (38.5%), 2 in 2 (5.1%)in the control group, the proportion of Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). For the patients with Perlas A semi-quantitative grade 2 (3 cases in the intervention group and 2 cases in the control group), metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected before anesthesia. No aspiration case was observed in this study. The intervention group was endured less thirst and hunger (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups at each time point (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea intraoperatively and postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography of gastric antrum can provide objective basis for evaluating gastric emptying of pregnant women perioperatively. 300 mL carbohydrates intake two hours before surgery, which does not increase GV and the risk of reflux aspiration, and is helpful in minimizing disturbance to the patient\'s physiological status, therefore leading to better clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胃内容物肺吸入是一种严重的围手术期并发症。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估内窥镜抽吸的胃体积与定量(窦横截面面积)和定性(空与非空)胃窦检查。此外,该研究旨在确定婴儿真正空胃窦的最佳胃窦横截面面积截止值.
    方法:本研究在儿科胃肠镜检查单元进行。在上消化道内镜评估之前,对46名禁食婴儿的仰卧位和右侧卧位进行了窦超声检查。记录两个位置的窦横截面积测量值和窦的定性评估(根据三点分级系统)。对胃内容物进行内镜抽吸和测量。
    结果:纳入46例患者(24个月以下)。根据三点定性分级制度,76.1%的患者被分类为0级。右侧卧位窦横截面积的最佳截止值,表示一个空的胃窦,被确定为2.40cm2。在这个特定的截止值,灵敏度是100%,特异性为68.6%,阴性预测值为100%。
    结论:胃超声检查可确认健康婴儿为空腹或接近空腹。
    Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the relationship between the gastric volumes suctioned endoscopically and quantitative (antral cross-section area) and qualitative (empty vs. nonempty) examination of the gastric antrum. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine the best antral cross-section area cutoff value for a truly empty antrum in infants.
    This study was performed in a pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Antral sonography was performed in supine and right lateral decubitus positions in 46 fasted infants prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation. Antral cross-sectional area measurements in both positions and qualitative evaluation of the antrum (according to a three-point grading system) were recorded. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned and measured.
    Forty-six patients (aged under 24 months) were included. According to the three-point qualitative grading system, 76.1% of patients were classified as grade 0. The best cutoff value for the antral cross-section area in the right lateral decubitus position, indicating an empty antrum, was determined to be 2.40 cm2. At this specific cutoff value, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity was 68.6%, and the negative predictive value was 100%.
    Gastric ultrasonography can confirm an empty or nearly empty stomach in healthy infants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:通过胃窦超声检查,研究在普伦登堡妇科腹腔镜手术中,手术前两小时摄入300mL碳水化合物对患者胃体积(GV)的影响。并进一步评估反流误吸的风险。
    方法:从2020年6月到2021年2月,共有80名患者,18-65岁,体重指数(BMI)18-35kg/m2,属于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状态Ⅰ或Ⅱ,本研究招募了在特伦德伦堡进行定位的妇科腹腔镜手术,并将其分为两组:观察组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。在观察组中,24:00后限制固体食物,要求患者在手术前两小时服用300mL碳水化合物。在对照组中,手术前一天晚上24:00后,固体食物和液体摄入受到限制。麻醉前以仰卧位和右侧卧位测量胃窦的横截面积(CSA)。主要结果是各组的胃体积(GV)。次要结果包括PerlasA半定量分级和胃体积/重量(GV/W)。所有患者均采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术前口渴感和饥饿感。
    结果:有80例患者的完整数据。干预组GV为(58.8±23.6)mL。对照组(56.3±22.1)mL,GV/W为(0.97±0.39)mL/kgvs.(0.95±0.35)mL/kg,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PerlasA半定量分级在24例患者中显示为0(60%),15例患者中有1例(37.5%),干预组1例患者中2例(2.5%),25例患者中0例(62.5%),1/13(32.5%),对照组2中2分(5%),PerlasA半定量分级的比例两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对PerlasA半定量分级2级患者3例(干预组1例,对照组2例)进行特殊干预,本研究未观察到误吸病例.观察组口渴、饥饿减少(P<0.05)。
    结论:手术前两小时摄入三百毫升碳水化合物,同时进行超声引导下的胃内容物监测,不会增加患者的胃体积和反流抽吸的风险,在普伦登堡进行妇科腹腔镜手术的定位,并有助于最大程度地减少对患者生理需求的干扰,因此导致更好的临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 300 mL carbohydrates intake two hours before sur-gery on the gastric volume (GV) in patients positioning in trendelenburg undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures by using gastric antrum sonography, and further assess the risk of reflux aspiration.
    METHODS: From June 2020 to February 2021, a total of 80 patients, aged 18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kg/m2, falling into American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic procedures positioning in trendelenburg were recruited and divided into two groups: the observation group (n =40) and the control group (n=40). In the observation group, solid food was restricted after 24:00, the patients were required to take 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before surgery. In the control group, solid food and liquid intake were restricted after 24:00 the night before surgery. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of gastric antrum was measured in supine position and right lateral decubitus position before anesthesia. Primary outcome was gastric volume (GV) in each group. Secondary outcome included Perlas A semi-quantitative grading and gastric volume/weight (GV/W). All the patients received assessment of preoperative feeling of thirsty and hunger with visual analogue scale (VAS).
    RESULTS: Complete data were available in eighty patients. GV was (58.8±23.6) mL in the intervention group vs. (56.3±22.1) mL in the control group, GV/W was (0.97±0.39) mL/kg vs. (0.95±0.35) mL/kg, respectively; all the above showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed 0 in 24 patients (60%), 1 in 15 patients (37.5%), 2 in 1 patient (2.5%) in the intervention group and 0 in 25 (62.5%), 1 in 13 (32.5%), 2 in 2 (5%) in the control group, the proportion of Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). A total of 3 patients (1 in the intervention group and 2 in the control group) with Perlas A semi-quantitative grading 2 were treated with special intervention, no aspiration case was observed in this study. The observation group endured less thirst and hunger (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Three hundred mL carbohydrates intake two hours before surgery along with ultrasound guided gastric content monitoring does not increase gastric volume and the risk of reflux aspiration in patients positioning in trendelenburg undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and is helpful in minimizing disturbance to the patient\'s physiological needs, therefore leading to better clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:由于腰麻后血压下降,剖宫产通常需要紧急输血负荷。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在研究术前口服补液液(ORS)是否稳定围手术期循环动力学。
    方法:将63例计划在腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)下进行剖宫产的产妇随机分为三组之一:O组睡前接受500mLORS,CSEA前2h接受500mL;M组接受矿泉水代替ORS;C组没有液体摄入(对照组)。进入手术室后,使用超声波测量胃的大小。获得了血液样本,CSEA被诱导。当收缩压<90mmHg或降低>20%时,给予血管加压药。作为血管加压药,去氧肾上腺素(0.1mg)以≥60次/分钟的心率给药或麻黄碱(5mg)以<60次/分钟的心率给药。主要结果是给药的加压药的总数。次要结果是胃窦的横截面积,母体血浆葡萄糖水平,血清钠水平,总静脉输液,出血量,尿量,手术时间,分娩后脐带血气体值。
    结果:O组的加压药总数低于C组(P<0.05)。O组去氧肾上腺素总剂量低于C组(P<0.05)。M组与其他组间差异无统计学意义。在次要结局方面没有检测到差异。
    结论:在计划剖宫产的妇女中,术前ORS稳定围手术期循环动力学。ORS和矿泉水的消耗都不会增加胃内容物的体积。
    背景:该试验在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心(UMIN000019825:注册日期2015-17-11)注册。
    Cesarean section often requires an urgent transfusion load due to decreased blood pressure after spinal anesthesia. This prospective randomized study aimed to investigate whether a preoperative oral rehydration solution (ORS) stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics.
    Sixty-three parturients scheduled for cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group O received 500 mL ORS before bedtime and 500 mL 2 h before CSEA; Group M received mineral water instead of ORS; and Group C had no fluid intake (controls). After entering the operating room, stomach size was measured using ultrasound. Blood samples were obtained, and CSEA was induced. Vasopressors were administered when systolic blood pressure was < 90 mmHg or decreased by > 20%. As a vasopressor, phenylephrine (0.1 mg) was administered at ≥ 60 beats/min heart rate or ephedrine (5 mg) at < 60 beats/min heart rate. The primary outcome was the total number of vasopressor boluses administered. Secondary outcomes were the cross-sectional area of the stomach antrum, maternal plasma glucose levels, serum sodium levels, total intravenous fluid, bleeding volume, urine volume, operative time, and cord blood gas values after delivery.
    The total number of vasopressor boluses was lower in Group O than in Group C (P < 0.05). Group O had lower total dose of phenylephrine than Group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Group M and other groups. No differences were detected regarding secondary outcomes.
    In women scheduled for cesarean section, preoperative ORS stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics. Neither ORS nor mineral water consumption increased the stomach content volume.
    This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019825: Date of registration 17/11/2015).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:应用床旁超声评价胃复安对急诊创伤患者胃动力的影响。方法:50例患者因外伤到张州医院急诊科就诊后立即行超声检查。将患者随机分为两组:甲氧氯普胺组(M组,n=25)和生理盐水组(S组,n=25)。在0、30、60、90和120分钟(T=时间)测量胃窦的横截面积(CSA)。胃排空率(GER,GER=-AareaTn/AareaTn-30-1×100),GER/min(GER除以相应的间隔时间),胃内容物特性,不同时间点的Perlas分级,T120胃容量(GV),评价每单位体重的GV(GV/W)。呕吐的风险,反流/抽吸,和麻醉治疗的类型也进行了评估。结果:两组各时间点胃窦CSA差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。M组胃窦CSA低于S组,两组之间的最大差异发生在T30(p<0.001)。两组之间的GER和GER/min差异也有统计学意义(p<0.001);M组的差异高于S组,两组之间的最大差异发生在T30(p<0.001)。两组的胃内容物性质和Perlas等级均无明显变化趋势,两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.97)。两组在T120时GV和GV/W的差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001),T120时的反流和误吸风险也是如此(p<0.001)。结论:甲氧氯普胺用于饱腹的急诊创伤患者时,它在30分钟内加速了胃排空,并降低了意外反流的风险。然而,没有达到正常的胃排空水平,这可以归因于创伤对胃排空的延迟作用。
    Objective: The present study aimed to use bedside ultrasound to evaluate the effects of metoclopramide on gastric motility in patients being treated for trauma in the emergency department. Methods: Fifty patients underwent an ultrasound immediately after attending the emergency department of Zhang Zhou Hospital due to trauma. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: a metoclopramide group (group M, n = 25) and a normal saline group (group S, n = 25). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric antrum was measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (T = time). The gastric emptying rate (GER, GER=-AareaTn/AareaTn-30-1×100), GER/min (GER divided by the corresponding interval time), gastric content properties, Perlas grade at different time points, T120 gastric volume (GV), and GV per unit of body weight (GV/W) were evaluated. The risk of vomiting, reflux/aspiration, and type of anesthetic treatment were also evaluated. Results: The differences between the two groups in the CSA of the gastric antrum at each time point were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The CSAs of the gastric antrum in group M were lower than those in group S, and the greatest difference between the two groups occurred at T30 (p < 0.001). The differences between the two groups in GER and GER/min were also statistically significant (p < 0.001); those differences in group M were higher than those in group S, and the greatest differences between the two groups occurred at T30 (p < 0.001). There were no obvious change trends in the properties of the gastric contents and the Perlas grades in either group, and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.97). The differences between the two groups in the GV and GV/W at T120 were statistically significant (p < 0.001), as was the risk of reflux and aspiration at T120 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: When metoclopramide was used in satiated emergency trauma patients, it accelerated gastric emptying within 30 min and reduced the risk of accidental reflux. However, a normal gastric emptying level was not achieved, which can be attributed to the delaying effect of trauma on gastric emptying.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:自由禁食方案,对于计划进行择期手术的儿童,在手术前1小时内支持清除液体的摄入,在指导方针中占据了他们的位置。然而,由于缺乏研究术前肥胖儿童胃排空时间的出版物,肥胖儿童1小时清流禁食的做法仍处于建议水平,证据薄弱.
    目的:本研究的主要目的是通过超声检查术前摄入3ml/kg含5%葡萄糖的透明液体后,肥胖和非肥胖儿童的胃排空时间是否存在差异。
    方法:将70名儿童分为两组,35个肥胖和35个非肥胖,6-14岁,他们被安排进行选择性手术。使用超声对组中的儿童进行基线窦横截面积测量。消耗3ml/kg的5%葡萄糖。在液体摄入后立即重复超声,并且每5分钟重复超声,直到窦横截面积处于基线水平。
    结果:非肥胖儿童[(35(30.0-45.0[20-60])]和肥胖儿童[(35(30.0-40.0[25-60])]的中位(IQR[范围])胃排空时间(分钟)差异无统计学意义(中位数为0.0,95%CI0.0至0.0;P=0,563)。在两组中的所有儿童中,在摄入具有3ml/kg5%葡萄糖的澄清液体后60分钟内,窦横截面积和重量调节的胃体积恢复到基线水平。
    结论:肥胖和非肥胖儿童的胃排空时间相似,这些组可以在手术前1小时提供含有3ml/kg5%葡萄糖的澄清液。
    Liberal fasting regimens, which support clear fluid intake up to 1 h before surgery in children scheduled for elective surgery, are taking their place in guidelines. However, because of the lack of publications that investigate the gastric emptying time in preoperative obese children, the practice of 1-hour clear fluid fasting in obese children remained at the level of recommendation with weak evidence.
    The primary aim was to investigate whether there is a difference in gastric emptying times between obese and non- obese children after preoperative intake of 3 mL/kg clear liquid containing 5% dextrose by using ultrasound.
    A total of 70 children were included in the study in two groups, 35 obese and 35 non-obese, aged 6-14 years, who were scheduled for elective surgery. The baseline antral cross-sectional area measurements of the children in the groups were made using ultrasound. 3 mL/kg 5% dextrose was consumed. Ultrasound was repeated immediately after fluid intake and every 5 min until the antral cross-sectional area was at the baseline level.
    The difference in median (IQR [range]) gastric emptying times (minutes) of non-obese {35 [30.0-45.0 (20-60)]} and obese children {35 [30.0-40.0 (25-60)]} were not statistically significant (median of differences 0.0, 95% CI -5.0 to 5.0; p = .563). The antral cross-sectional area and weight-adjusted gastric volumes returned to the baseline level within 60 min after the intake of clear liquid with 3 mL/kg 5% dextrose in all children in both groups.
    Obese and non-obese children have similar gastric emptying times, and these groups can be offered clear fluids containing 3 mL/kg 5% dextrose 1 h before the surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:关于在麻醉诱导中呼吸暂停期间胃容量与无通气的面罩氧合之间关系的研究很少。这项研究比较了成人腹腔镜手术中使用面罩通气和无通气的面罩氧合麻醉诱导时呼吸暂停期间胃体积的变化。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,随机化,双盲试验,将70名在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜手术的成年人分为两组,在意识丧失后60秒接受有通气和无通气的面罩氧合。麻醉诱导前和气管插管后,用超声成像测量胃窦横截面积.在基线(T1)测试动脉血气,预充氧后(T2),意识丧失(T3)后,气管插管前后(分别为T4和T5)。
    结果:纳入60例患者(通气n=30;非通气n=30,排除10例)。通气组胃窦横截面积的中位数[IQR]变化明显高于非通气组(0.83[0.20to1.54]vs.0.10[-0.11至0.56]cm2,P=0.001)。在T4和T5时,通气组的PaO2明显高于非通气组(T4:391.83±61.53vs.336.23±74.99mmHg,P<0.01;T5:364.00±58.65vs.297.13±86.95mmHg,P<0.01),而非通气组的PaCO2明显升高(T4:46.57±5.78vs.37.27±6.10mmHg,P<0.01;T5:48.77±6.59vs.42.63±6.03mmHg,P<0.01),非通气组pH值明显降低(T4:7.35±0.029vs7.42±0.047,P<0.01;T5:7.34±0.033vs7.39±0.044,P<0.01)。在T4时,非通气组的HCO3-显着升高(25.79±2.36vs.23.98±2.18mmol1-1,P<0.01)。
    结论:在呼吸暂停期间,与正压通气相比,在不进行面罩氧合的患者中,胃容量增加较轻.
    背景:ChiCTR2100054193,2021年10月12日,标题:“腹腔镜手术中全身麻醉诱导期间正压和非正压通气对胃容量的影响:一项随机对照试验”。网站:https://www.chictr.ogr.cn.
    Studies focusing on the relationship between gastric volume and facemask oxygenation without ventilation during apnea in anesthesia induction are scarce. This study compared the change in gastric volume during apnea in anesthesia induction using facemask ventilation and facemask oxygenation without ventilation in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
    In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 70 adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were divided into two groups to receive facemask oxygenation with and without ventilation for 60 seconds after loss of consciousness. Before anesthesia induction and after endotracheal intubation, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was measured with ultrasound imaging. Arterial blood gases were tested at baseline (T1), after preoxygenation (T2), after loss of consciousness (T3), and before and after endotracheal intubation (T4 and T5, respectively).
    Sixty patients were included (ventilation n = 30; non ventilation n = 30, 10 patients were excluded). The median [IQR] change of gastric antral cross-sectional area in ventilation group was significantly higher than in non ventilation group (0.83 [0.20 to 1.54] vs. 0.10 [- 0.11 to 0.56] cm2, P = 0.001). At T4 and T5, the PaO2 in ventilation group was significantly higher than in non ventilation group (T4: 391.83 ± 61.53 vs. 336.23 ± 74.99 mmHg, P < 0.01; T5: 364.00 ± 58.65 vs. 297.13 ± 86.95 mmHg, P < 0.01), while the PaCO2 in non ventilation group was significantly higher (T4: 46.57 ± 5.78 vs. 37.27 ± 6.10 mmHg, P < 0.01; T5: 48.77 ± 6.59 vs. 42.63 ± 6.03 mmHg, P < 0.01) and the pH value in non ventilation group was significantly lower (T4: 7.35 ± 0.029 vs 7.42 ± 0.047, P < 0.01; T5: 7.34 ± 0.033 vs 7.39 ± 0.044, P < 0.01). At T4, the HCO3- in non ventilation group was significantly higher (25.79 ± 2.36 vs. 23.98 ± 2.18 mmol l- 1, P < 0.01).
    During apnoea, the increase in gastric volume was milder in patients undergoing facemask oxygenation without ventilation than with positive pressure ventilation.
    ChiCTR2100054193, 10/12/2021, Title: \"Effect of positive pressure and non-positive pressure ventilation on gastric volume during induction of general anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial\". Website: https://www.chictr.ogr.cn .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肥胖是一个广泛流行的医学和社会经济问题。减肥手术适用于临床严重肥胖患者。胃体积减少是腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后体重减轻的重要因素。研究了LSG后胃体积对体重的影响。
    目的:本研究旨在评估LSG之前肥胖患者和正常体重患者的胃容量,使用三维多探测器计算机断层扫描(3D-MDCT),并评估胃体积与体重指数(BMI)的潜在相关性。
    方法:共有100名患者被平均纳入两组:一组为肥胖患者,一组为LSG,另一组为体重正常的患者,一组为非减肥手术。研究患者接受了3D-MDCT胃容积测量。
    结果:肥胖患者的胃体积为525至1170mL,正常体重组的胃体积为312至676mL。两组间差异有统计学意义。年龄,体重,发现BMI仅是体重正常患者胃体积的预测因子。
    结论:MDCT胃容积法是评估胃容积的可行方法。肥胖患者的容量更高。年龄,体重,和BMI是正常体重患者胃体积的预测因子,线性回归方程可以在减肥手术的术前计划中提供帮助。
    Obesity is a widely prevalent medical and socioeconomic problem. Bariatric surgery is indicated for patients with clinically severe obesity. Reduction of gastric volume is an important factor that contributes to weight loss after laparscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The impact of the gastric volume on weight after LSG has been studied.
    This study was designed to assess the gastric volume in patients with obesity prior to LSG and in the normal-weight patients, using three-dimensional multi-detector computer tomography (3D-MDCT), and to evaluate the potential correlation of the gastric volume with body mass index (BMI).
    A total of 100 patients were equally enrolled in two groups: one group for patients with obesity scheduled for LSG and another one for normal-weight patients scheduled for non-bariatric surgery. The study patients underwent 3D-MDCT gastric volumetry.
    The gastric volume ranged from 525 to 1170 mL in patients with obesity and from 312 to 676 mL in the normal-weight group. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Age, weight, and BMI were found to be predictors for the gastric volume in normal-weight patients only.
    MDCT gastric volumetry is a feasible method to assess the stomach volume. Higher volumes were evident in patients with obesity. Age, weight, and BMI are predictors for the gastric volume in normal-weight patients with linear regression equations that could help during the preoperative planning of bariatric surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号