Gastric volume

胃体积
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术前药物预防在全身麻醉(GA)下预防吸入性肺炎低风险患者吸入性肺炎中的作用仍在争论中。我们通过使用有和没有药理酸吸入预防的超声评估胃体积的变化,解决了在高危人群中常规药理吸入预防的需求。
    单中心,随机双盲试验,有200名成年患者计划在GA下进行择期外科手术,被随机分为预防组,患者口服法莫替丁和甲氧氯普胺,和一个没有预防的组,其中患者没有接受任何预防。通过超声对胃窦体积的预诱导测量得出的胃体积,诱导后胃pH,并比较吸入性肺炎的发生率。Bland-Altman图用于根据计算的胃体积确定测得的胃体积与超声检查之间的一致性水平。
    无预防组的胃窦横截面积(CSA)和体积(3.12cm2和20.11ml,分别)与预防组(2.56cm2和19.67ml,分别)(P值分别为0.97和0.63)。尽管无预防组的胃pH值在统计学上有显着下降(P值0.01),根据Roberts和Shirley标准,增加吸入性肺炎的风险无临床意义(P值0.39).
    在足够禁食的低风险人群中,残余胃体积的量相似,低于抽吸阈值,无论吸入预防状况如何。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing aspiration pneumonitis under general anesthesia (GA) in patients at low risk of aspiration pneumonitis is still under debate. We addressed the need for routine pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis in at-risk population by assessing the change in gastric volume using ultrasound with and without pharmacological acid aspiration prophylaxis.
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center, randomized double-blinded trial, with 200 adult patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures under GA, were randomized into a prophylaxis group, in which the patients received oral famotidine and metoclopramide, and a no prophylaxis group, in which the patients did not receive any prophylaxis. Gastric volume derived from preinduction measurement of gastric antral volume by ultrasound, postinduction gastric pH, and incidences of aspiration pneumonitis were compared. Bland-Altman plot was used to determine the level of agreement between measured gastric volume and ultrasonography based on calculated gastric volume.
    UNASSIGNED: The gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the no prophylaxis group (3.12 cm2 and 20.11 ml, respectively) were comparable to the prophylaxis group (2.56 cm2 and 19.67 ml, respectively) (P-values 0.97 and 0.63, respectively). Although there was a statistically significant decrease in gastric pH in the no prophylaxis group (P-value 0.01), it was not clinically significant to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonitis based on Roberts and Shirley criteria (P-value 0.39).
    UNASSIGNED: In an adequately fasted low-risk population, the amount of residual gastric volume was similar and below the aspiration threshold, regardless of the aspiration prophylaxis status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景术前禁食6小时,接受透明液体直到手术2小时是常规做法。富含碳水化合物的液体拮抗分解代谢,据称耐受性更好。这项研究旨在比较富含碳水化合物的饮料对接受普通水择期手术的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的胃容量和血糖控制的影响。方法将240例40~65岁在区域麻醉下择期手术的患者随机分为糖尿病对照,糖尿病研究,非糖尿病控制,和非糖尿病研究。对照组给予白开水400ml,而研究组在手术前两小时接受了溶于400毫升水中的50克葡萄糖。使用USG评估胃体积,使用Likert量表评估口渴和不适。围手术期,使用胰岛素监测和控制血糖值.结果糖尿病对照组的平均胃体积(ml)(35.3±12.95ml),糖尿病研究(31.2±11.75ml),非糖尿病对照(29±11.42ml),与非糖尿病研究(30.4±9.12ml)比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与糖尿病对照组(138.66±15.81mg/dl)相比,摄入液体后两小时的毛细血管血糖(CBG)值显示糖尿病研究中的CBG水平显著增加(183.2±28.67mg/dl)。这些值在6小时内返回到基线。在糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的研究组中,口渴和不适显着降低。结论我们得出结论,碳水化合物负荷不会影响糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的胃体积。然而,糖值确实会增加,这可能需要对糖尿病患者进行每小时的胰岛素检查和给药。
    Background Preoperative fasting for six hours and accepting clear fluids till two hours of surgery is followed as a regular practice. Carbohydrate-rich fluids antagonize catabolism and are claimed to be tolerated better. This study aims to compare the effect of carbohydrate-rich drinks on gastric volume and blood sugar control in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing elective surgery with plain water. Methods Two hundred forty patients aged 40 to 65 undergoing elective surgery under regional anesthesia were randomized into diabetic control, diabetic study, non-diabetic control, and non-diabetic study. Control groups were given 400 ml of plain water, while the study group received 50 grams of dextrose dissolved in 400 ml of water two hours prior to surgery. Gastric volume was evaluated using USG, and thirst and discomfort were assessed using the Likert scale. Perioperatively, blood sugar values were monitored and kept under control using insulin. Results Mean gastric volume (ml) in diabetic control (35.3±12.95 ml), diabetic study (31.2±11.75 ml), non-diabetic control (29±11.42 ml), and non-diabetic study (30.4±9.12 ml) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Capillary blood glucose (CBG) values two hours post fluid intake showed a significant increase in CBG levels in the diabetic study (183.2±28.67 mg/dl) compared to the diabetic control group (138.66±15.81 mg/dl). The values returned to baseline within six hours. Thirst and discomfort were significantly lower in the study group of diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Conclusion We conclude that carbohydrate loading does not affect gastric volume in diabetics and non-diabetics. However, the sugar values do increase which may warrant hourly checking and administration of insulin in diabetics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:探讨胃窦超声检查对剖宫产术前2小时口服300mL碳水化合物后胃排空的影响。并分析孕妇胃排空的危险因素。
    方法:从2020年8月到2021年2月,共有80名患者,22-43岁,体重指数(BMI)<35kg/m2,胎龄≥36周,进入美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状况Ⅰ或Ⅱ,研究对象为北京大学国际医院剖宫产,分为干预组(n=40)和对照组(n=40).在干预组中,22:00后限制固体食物,要求患者在剖宫产前两小时服用300mL碳水化合物。在对照组中,手术前一天晚上22:00后,固体食物和液体摄入受到限制。所有患者均采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术前口渴感和饥饿感。麻醉前以仰卧位和右仰卧位测量胃窦横截面积(CSA),进一步计算两组的胃体积(GV)和胃体积/体重(GV/W)。Perlas在每个患者中进行半定量分级评估。入院时(T0)记录血压和心率,麻醉后5分钟(T1),胎儿分娩后立即(T2)和手术结束时(T3)。记录术中及术后24h恶心呕吐的发生情况。
    结果:每组均排除一例,因为在超声评估期间未明确确定胃窦。在半坐姿,干预组的CSA为(5.07±1.73)cm2。对照组(5.24±1.96)cm2,分别;在右侧卧位,干预组CSA为(7.32±2.17)cm2。对照组(7.25±2.24)cm2,GV为(91.74±32.34)mL与(90.07±31.68)mL,GV/W为(1.27±0.40)mL/kgvs.(1.22±0.41)mL/kg,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PerlasA半定量分级在20例患者中显示为0(51.3%),1/16(41%),干预组3人中有2人(7.7%),22人中有0人(56.4%),1/15(38.5%),对照组2/2(5.1%),PerlasA半定量分级的比例两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对PerlasA半定量2级患者(干预组3例,对照组2例),麻醉前静脉注射甲氧氯普胺0.2mg/kg。在这项研究中没有观察到误吸病例。干预组口渴、饥饿减少(P<0.05)。两组各时间点血压、心率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术中低血压发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术中、术后恶心发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论:胃窦超声检查可为孕妇围手术期胃排空功能评估提供客观依据。手术前两小时摄入300毫升碳水化合物,不会增加GV和反流吸入的风险,并且有助于最小化对患者生理状态的干扰,因此导致更好的临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of gastric antrum ultrasonography in evaluating gastric emptying after oral administration of 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section, and to analyze the risk factors of gastric emptying in pregnant women.
    METHODS: From August 2020 to February 2021, a total of 80 patients, aged 22-43 years, body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2, gestational age≥36 weeks, falling into American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for cesarean sections in Peking University International Hospital were recruited and divided into two groups: the intervention group (n=40)and the control group (n=40). In the intervention group, solid food was restricted after 22:00, the patients were required to take 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before cesarean section. In the control group, solid food and liquid intake were restricted after 22:00 the night before surgery. All the patients received assessment of preoperative feeling of thirst and starvation with visual analogue scale (VAS). The cross-sectional area (CSA)of gastric antrum was measured in supine position and right supine position before anesthesia, the gastric volume (GV)and the gastric volume/weight(GV/W)of the two groups was further calculated. Perlas A semi-quantitative grading assessments were performed in each patient. The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at admission(T0), 5 minutes after anesthesia (T1), immediately after fetal delivery (T2) and at the end of the surgery (T3). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during the operation and 24 hours after the operation were recorded.
    RESULTS: One case in each group was excluded because the antrum was not clearly identified during the ultrasound assessments. In the semi-sitting position, the CSA was (5.07±1.73) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (5.24±1.96) cm2 in the control group, respectively; in the right lateral decubitus position, CSA was (7.32±2.17) cm2 in the intervention group vs. (7.25±2.24) cm2 in the control group, GV was (91.74±32.34) mL vs. (90.07±31.68) mL, GV/W was (1.27±0.40) mL/kg vs. (1.22±0.41) mL/kg, respectively; all the above showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed 0 in 20 patients (51.3%), 1 in 16 (41%), 2 in 3 (7.7%)in the intervention group and 0 in 22 (56.4%), 1 in 15 (38.5%), 2 in 2 (5.1%)in the control group, the proportion of Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). For the patients with Perlas A semi-quantitative grade 2 (3 cases in the intervention group and 2 cases in the control group), metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected before anesthesia. No aspiration case was observed in this study. The intervention group was endured less thirst and hunger (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups at each time point (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea intraoperatively and postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography of gastric antrum can provide objective basis for evaluating gastric emptying of pregnant women perioperatively. 300 mL carbohydrates intake two hours before surgery, which does not increase GV and the risk of reflux aspiration, and is helpful in minimizing disturbance to the patient\'s physiological status, therefore leading to better clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:通过胃窦超声检查,研究在普伦登堡妇科腹腔镜手术中,手术前两小时摄入300mL碳水化合物对患者胃体积(GV)的影响。并进一步评估反流误吸的风险。
    方法:从2020年6月到2021年2月,共有80名患者,18-65岁,体重指数(BMI)18-35kg/m2,属于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状态Ⅰ或Ⅱ,本研究招募了在特伦德伦堡进行定位的妇科腹腔镜手术,并将其分为两组:观察组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。在观察组中,24:00后限制固体食物,要求患者在手术前两小时服用300mL碳水化合物。在对照组中,手术前一天晚上24:00后,固体食物和液体摄入受到限制。麻醉前以仰卧位和右侧卧位测量胃窦的横截面积(CSA)。主要结果是各组的胃体积(GV)。次要结果包括PerlasA半定量分级和胃体积/重量(GV/W)。所有患者均采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术前口渴感和饥饿感。
    结果:有80例患者的完整数据。干预组GV为(58.8±23.6)mL。对照组(56.3±22.1)mL,GV/W为(0.97±0.39)mL/kgvs.(0.95±0.35)mL/kg,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PerlasA半定量分级在24例患者中显示为0(60%),15例患者中有1例(37.5%),干预组1例患者中2例(2.5%),25例患者中0例(62.5%),1/13(32.5%),对照组2中2分(5%),PerlasA半定量分级的比例两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对PerlasA半定量分级2级患者3例(干预组1例,对照组2例)进行特殊干预,本研究未观察到误吸病例.观察组口渴、饥饿减少(P<0.05)。
    结论:手术前两小时摄入三百毫升碳水化合物,同时进行超声引导下的胃内容物监测,不会增加患者的胃体积和反流抽吸的风险,在普伦登堡进行妇科腹腔镜手术的定位,并有助于最大程度地减少对患者生理需求的干扰,因此导致更好的临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 300 mL carbohydrates intake two hours before sur-gery on the gastric volume (GV) in patients positioning in trendelenburg undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures by using gastric antrum sonography, and further assess the risk of reflux aspiration.
    METHODS: From June 2020 to February 2021, a total of 80 patients, aged 18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kg/m2, falling into American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic procedures positioning in trendelenburg were recruited and divided into two groups: the observation group (n =40) and the control group (n=40). In the observation group, solid food was restricted after 24:00, the patients were required to take 300 mL carbohydrates two hours before surgery. In the control group, solid food and liquid intake were restricted after 24:00 the night before surgery. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of gastric antrum was measured in supine position and right lateral decubitus position before anesthesia. Primary outcome was gastric volume (GV) in each group. Secondary outcome included Perlas A semi-quantitative grading and gastric volume/weight (GV/W). All the patients received assessment of preoperative feeling of thirsty and hunger with visual analogue scale (VAS).
    RESULTS: Complete data were available in eighty patients. GV was (58.8±23.6) mL in the intervention group vs. (56.3±22.1) mL in the control group, GV/W was (0.97±0.39) mL/kg vs. (0.95±0.35) mL/kg, respectively; all the above showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed 0 in 24 patients (60%), 1 in 15 patients (37.5%), 2 in 1 patient (2.5%) in the intervention group and 0 in 25 (62.5%), 1 in 13 (32.5%), 2 in 2 (5%) in the control group, the proportion of Perlas A semi-quantitative grading showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). A total of 3 patients (1 in the intervention group and 2 in the control group) with Perlas A semi-quantitative grading 2 were treated with special intervention, no aspiration case was observed in this study. The observation group endured less thirst and hunger (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Three hundred mL carbohydrates intake two hours before surgery along with ultrasound guided gastric content monitoring does not increase gastric volume and the risk of reflux aspiration in patients positioning in trendelenburg undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and is helpful in minimizing disturbance to the patient\'s physiological needs, therefore leading to better clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:由于腰麻后血压下降,剖宫产通常需要紧急输血负荷。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在研究术前口服补液液(ORS)是否稳定围手术期循环动力学。
    方法:将63例计划在腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)下进行剖宫产的产妇随机分为三组之一:O组睡前接受500mLORS,CSEA前2h接受500mL;M组接受矿泉水代替ORS;C组没有液体摄入(对照组)。进入手术室后,使用超声波测量胃的大小。获得了血液样本,CSEA被诱导。当收缩压<90mmHg或降低>20%时,给予血管加压药。作为血管加压药,去氧肾上腺素(0.1mg)以≥60次/分钟的心率给药或麻黄碱(5mg)以<60次/分钟的心率给药。主要结果是给药的加压药的总数。次要结果是胃窦的横截面积,母体血浆葡萄糖水平,血清钠水平,总静脉输液,出血量,尿量,手术时间,分娩后脐带血气体值。
    结果:O组的加压药总数低于C组(P<0.05)。O组去氧肾上腺素总剂量低于C组(P<0.05)。M组与其他组间差异无统计学意义。在次要结局方面没有检测到差异。
    结论:在计划剖宫产的妇女中,术前ORS稳定围手术期循环动力学。ORS和矿泉水的消耗都不会增加胃内容物的体积。
    背景:该试验在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心(UMIN000019825:注册日期2015-17-11)注册。
    Cesarean section often requires an urgent transfusion load due to decreased blood pressure after spinal anesthesia. This prospective randomized study aimed to investigate whether a preoperative oral rehydration solution (ORS) stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics.
    Sixty-three parturients scheduled for cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group O received 500 mL ORS before bedtime and 500 mL 2 h before CSEA; Group M received mineral water instead of ORS; and Group C had no fluid intake (controls). After entering the operating room, stomach size was measured using ultrasound. Blood samples were obtained, and CSEA was induced. Vasopressors were administered when systolic blood pressure was < 90 mmHg or decreased by > 20%. As a vasopressor, phenylephrine (0.1 mg) was administered at ≥ 60 beats/min heart rate or ephedrine (5 mg) at < 60 beats/min heart rate. The primary outcome was the total number of vasopressor boluses administered. Secondary outcomes were the cross-sectional area of the stomach antrum, maternal plasma glucose levels, serum sodium levels, total intravenous fluid, bleeding volume, urine volume, operative time, and cord blood gas values after delivery.
    The total number of vasopressor boluses was lower in Group O than in Group C (P < 0.05). Group O had lower total dose of phenylephrine than Group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Group M and other groups. No differences were detected regarding secondary outcomes.
    In women scheduled for cesarean section, preoperative ORS stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics. Neither ORS nor mineral water consumption increased the stomach content volume.
    This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019825: Date of registration 17/11/2015).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:应用床旁超声评价胃复安对急诊创伤患者胃动力的影响。方法:50例患者因外伤到张州医院急诊科就诊后立即行超声检查。将患者随机分为两组:甲氧氯普胺组(M组,n=25)和生理盐水组(S组,n=25)。在0、30、60、90和120分钟(T=时间)测量胃窦的横截面积(CSA)。胃排空率(GER,GER=-AareaTn/AareaTn-30-1×100),GER/min(GER除以相应的间隔时间),胃内容物特性,不同时间点的Perlas分级,T120胃容量(GV),评价每单位体重的GV(GV/W)。呕吐的风险,反流/抽吸,和麻醉治疗的类型也进行了评估。结果:两组各时间点胃窦CSA差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。M组胃窦CSA低于S组,两组之间的最大差异发生在T30(p<0.001)。两组之间的GER和GER/min差异也有统计学意义(p<0.001);M组的差异高于S组,两组之间的最大差异发生在T30(p<0.001)。两组的胃内容物性质和Perlas等级均无明显变化趋势,两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.97)。两组在T120时GV和GV/W的差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001),T120时的反流和误吸风险也是如此(p<0.001)。结论:甲氧氯普胺用于饱腹的急诊创伤患者时,它在30分钟内加速了胃排空,并降低了意外反流的风险。然而,没有达到正常的胃排空水平,这可以归因于创伤对胃排空的延迟作用。
    Objective: The present study aimed to use bedside ultrasound to evaluate the effects of metoclopramide on gastric motility in patients being treated for trauma in the emergency department. Methods: Fifty patients underwent an ultrasound immediately after attending the emergency department of Zhang Zhou Hospital due to trauma. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: a metoclopramide group (group M, n = 25) and a normal saline group (group S, n = 25). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric antrum was measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (T = time). The gastric emptying rate (GER, GER=-AareaTn/AareaTn-30-1×100), GER/min (GER divided by the corresponding interval time), gastric content properties, Perlas grade at different time points, T120 gastric volume (GV), and GV per unit of body weight (GV/W) were evaluated. The risk of vomiting, reflux/aspiration, and type of anesthetic treatment were also evaluated. Results: The differences between the two groups in the CSA of the gastric antrum at each time point were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The CSAs of the gastric antrum in group M were lower than those in group S, and the greatest difference between the two groups occurred at T30 (p < 0.001). The differences between the two groups in GER and GER/min were also statistically significant (p < 0.001); those differences in group M were higher than those in group S, and the greatest differences between the two groups occurred at T30 (p < 0.001). There were no obvious change trends in the properties of the gastric contents and the Perlas grades in either group, and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.97). The differences between the two groups in the GV and GV/W at T120 were statistically significant (p < 0.001), as was the risk of reflux and aspiration at T120 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: When metoclopramide was used in satiated emergency trauma patients, it accelerated gastric emptying within 30 min and reduced the risk of accidental reflux. However, a normal gastric emptying level was not achieved, which can be attributed to the delaying effect of trauma on gastric emptying.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在确定硬糖对择期食管胃十二指肠镜检查和结肠镜检查患者胃内容物体积和pH的影响。此外,这项研究评估了手术的难度,并发症,以及内窥镜医师和患者的满意度。
    UNASSIGNED:一项随机对照研究平均招募了108名门诊患者进入糖果组和对照组。糖果组患者可以在麻醉前2小时内食用无糖糖果,而对照组保持禁食。内镜手术在局部咽部麻醉和静脉镇静下开始。失明的内窥镜医师通过内窥镜抽吸胃体积。一个盲目的麻醉提供者用pH计测试了胃的pH。主要结果变量是胃体积和pH。次要结果变量是并发症,程序的难度,以及内窥镜医师和患者满意度。
    UNASSIGNED:两组患者的特征具有可比性。糖果组的平均胃体积(0.43[0.27-0.67]mL/kg)与对照组(0.32[0.19-0.55]mL/kg)没有显着差异。两组的胃pH相似:糖果组为1.40(1.10-1.70),对照组为1.40(1.20-1.90)。糖果组的操作难度评分高于对照组。内镜医师和两组患者的满意度评分具有可比性。此外,糖果组和对照组的大多数内窥镜医师和患者报告“非常满意”。两组均无并发症发生。
    未经证实:硬糖不影响胃容量或pH。对术前食用糖果的成年患者进行选择性胃肠内镜手术可以防止工作流程的延迟和中断。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the effect of hard candies on gastric content volume and pH in patients undergoing elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Additionally, the study evaluated the difficulty of the procedure, complications, and satisfaction levels of the endoscopist and patient.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized controlled study equally recruited 108 outpatients to candy and control groups. The patients in the candy group could consume sugar-free candies within 2 hours before anesthesia, while the controls remained fasted. The endoscopic procedure began under topical pharyngeal anesthesia and intravenous sedation. A blinded endoscopist suctioned the gastric volume through an endoscope. A blinded anesthesia provider tested the gastric pH with a pH meter. The primary outcome variables were gastric volume and pH. The secondary outcome variables were complications, the difficulty of the procedure, and endoscopist and patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: The characteristics of both patient groups were comparable. The mean gastric volume of the candy group (0.43 [0.27-0.67] mL/kg) was not significantly different from that of the control group (0.32 [0.19-0.55] mL/kg). The gastric pH of both groups was similar: 1.40 (1.10-1.70) for the candy group and 1.40 (1.20-1.90) for the control group. The procedure-difficulty score of the candy group was higher than that of the control group. The satisfaction scores rated by the endoscopist and the patients in both groups were comparable. In addition, most endoscopists and patients in the candy and control groups reported being \"very satisfied\". No complications were observed in either group.
    UNASSIGNED: Hard candies did not affect gastric volume or pH. Elective gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in adult patients who preoperatively consume candies could proceed to prevent delays and disruption of workflows.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:促进术后恢复主张在麻醉前两小时摄入碳水化合物有利于患者的恢复。糖尿病患者容易出现胃排空延迟。由于对返流风险的担忧,糖尿病患者术前碳水化合物消耗的不同指南仍存在争议。误吸和高血糖。超声胃容积(GV)评估和血糖监测可综合评价2型糖尿病(T2D)患者术前碳水化合物摄入的安全性和可行性。
    目的:评估术前碳水化合物负荷对T2D患者麻醉诱导前GV的影响。
    方法:纳入2019年12月至2020年12月在全身麻醉下接受手术的T2D患者。将78例患者随机分为4组,在麻醉诱导前2小时接受0、100、200或300mL碳水化合物负荷。单位重量的胃体积(GV/W),Perlas等级,血糖水平的变化,在麻醉诱导前评估反流和误吸的风险。
    结果:麻醉诱导前各组GV/W比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PerlasII级和GV/W>1.5mL/kg的患者人数在各组间无差异(P>0.05)。接受300mL碳水化合物饮料的患者血糖水平增加>2mmol/L,显著高于第1组和第2组(P<0.05)。
    结论:T2D患者在麻醉诱导前2小时的术前碳水化合物负荷<300mL并不影响GV或增加反流和误吸的风险。术前碳水化合物负荷<200mL时,血糖水平没有显着变化。然而,300mL碳水化合物负荷可能会增加麻醉诱导前T2D患者的血糖水平。
    BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery advocates that consuming carbohydrates two hours before anesthesia is beneficial to the patient\'s recovery. Patients with diabetes are prone to delayed gastric emptying. Different guidelines for preoperative carbohydrate consumption in patients with diabetes remain controversial due to concerns about the risk of regurgitation, aspiration and hyperglycemia. Ultrasonic gastric volume (GV) assessment and blood glucose monitoring can comprehensively evaluate the safety and feasibility of preoperative carbohydrate intake in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative carbohydrate loading on GV before anesthesia induction in T2D patients.
    METHODS: Patients with T2D receiving surgery under general anesthesia from December 2019 to December 2020 were included. A total of 78 patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups receiving 0, 100, 200, or 300 mL of carbohydrate loading 2 h before anesthesia induction. Gastric volume per unit weight (GV/W), Perlas grade, changes in blood glucose level, and risk of reflux and aspiration were evaluated before anesthesia induction.
    RESULTS: No significant difference was found in GV/W among the groups before anesthesia induction (P > 0.05). The number of patients with Perlas grade II and GV/W > 1.5 mL/kg did not differ among the groups (P > 0.05). Blood glucose level increased by > 2 mmol/L in patients receiving 300 mL carbohydrate drink, which was significantly higher than that in groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative carbohydrate loading < 300 mL 2 h before induction of anesthesia in patients with T2D did not affect GV or increase the risk of reflux and aspiration. Blood glucose levels did not change significantly with preoperative carbohydrate loading of < 200 mL. However, 300 mL carbohydrate loading may increase blood glucose levels in patients with T2D before induction of anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胃内容物的存在会增加全身麻醉期间误吸的风险。糖尿病患者胃排空延迟;然而,尽管由于糖尿病性胃轻瘫而禁食足够,但这些患者误吸的风险很高。这项研究旨在比较在全身麻醉下择期手术的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者在超声引导下对残余胃体积的测量。
    这项前瞻性观察性研究包括80名患者,分为两组:40名至少有8年糖尿病病史的糖尿病患者和40名年龄>18岁的非糖尿病患者。美国麻醉医师协会的身体状态I-II保持相似的禁食间隔。全身麻醉诱导前,使用标准胃扫描方案进行胃超声检查,测量头尾(CC)和前后(AP)直径,然后使用弯曲阵列探头计算半坐位(SS)和右侧卧位(RLD)的窦横截面积(CSA)和胃体积.胃窦体积(GV)分为0级,1级或2级,并进行了误吸风险分层。麻醉诱导后插入鼻胃管以抽吸并比较胃内容物。
    在半坐姿,非糖尿病组的平均CC和AP直径分别为16.38±3.31mm和10.1±2.53mm,糖尿病组为25.19±4.08mm和15.8±3.51mm。分别。在RLD,非糖尿病组CC为1.91±0.38cm,AP为1.19±0.34cm,糖尿病组CC为2.78±0.4cm,AP为1.81±0.39cm。糖尿病患者计算的CSA为318.23±97.14mm2和4±1.1cm2,明显高于非糖尿病患者的133.12±58.56mm2和1.83±0.83cm2,在SS(p<0.0001)和RLD(p<0.0001)位置,分别。糖尿病组GV为15.48±11.18ml,明显高于非糖尿病组的(-)9.77±18.56ml(p<0.0001)。尽管糖尿病组和非糖尿病组之间的CSA和GV存在差异,两组患者的胃残留量均较低(<1.5ml/kg).非糖尿病组和糖尿病组的胃管抽吸液为0.3±0.78ml和1.24±1.46ml,分别,并且具有统计学意义(p=0.0006)。
    长期糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者相比,胃残留和窦CSA更高。这些发现的临床意义需要进一步的证据来制定糖尿病患者的具体指南。
    UNASSIGNED: The presence of gastric content increases the risk of aspiration during general anesthesia. Diabetic patients have delayed gastric emptying; however, despite adequate fasting because of diabetic gastroparesis these patients have a high risk of aspiration. This study aimed to compare ultrasound-guided measurement of residual gastric volume between diabetic and non-diabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study included 80 patients divided into two groups of 40 diabetic patients with a minimum of 8 years history of diabetes and 40 nondiabetic patients aged >18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists\' physical status I-II kept with similar fasting intervals. Before induction of general anesthesia, gastric ultrasound was performed using standard gastric scanning protocol to measure craniocaudal (CC) and anteroposterior (AP) diameters followed by calculation of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and gastric volume in semi-sitting (SS) and right lateral decubitus (RLD) position using curved array probe. The gastric antrum volume (GV) was classified as Grade 0, 1, or 2, and risk stratification for aspiration was done. The nasogastric tube was inserted after induction of anesthesia to aspirate and compare the gastric content.
    UNASSIGNED: In the semi-sitting position, the mean CC and AP diameters were 16.38 ± 3.31 mm and 10.1 ± 2.53 mm in the non-diabetic group and 25.19 ± 4.08 mm and 15.8 ± 3.51 mm in the diabetic group, respectively. In RLD, CC was 1.91 ± 0.38 cm and AP was 1.19 ± 0.34 cm in the non-diabetic group as compared to the CC of 2.78 ± 0.4 cm and AP of 1.81 ± 0.39 cm in the diabetic group. The calculated CSA of 318.23 ± 97.14 mm2 and 4 ± 1.1 cm2 in diabetic were significantly higher than 133.12 ± 58.56 mm2 and 1.83 ± 0.83 cm2 of non-diabetic, in SS (p < 0.0001) and RLD (p < 0.0001) positions, respectively. The GV of 15.48 ± 11.18 ml in the diabetic group was significantly higher than (-) 9.77 ± 18.56 ml in the non-diabetic group (p < 0.0001). Despite the differences in CSA and GV between diabetic and non-diabetic groups, both groups showed a low gastric residual volume (<1.5 ml/kg). The gastric tube aspirate in the non-diabetic and diabetic groups was 0.3 ± 0.78 ml and 1.24 ± 1.46 ml, respectively, and was statistically significant (p = 0.0006).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with long-standing diabetes showed higher gastric residual and antral CSA when compared with non-diabetic patients. The clinical significance of these findings needs further evidence for the formulation of specific guidelines for diabetic patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Long-term studies reported inadequate weight loss or weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study investigated a possible relationship between preoperative gastric volume (GV) measured by CT volumetry and weight loss one year after LSG.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective study included 120 patients scheduled for LSG. 3D CT gastric volumetry was done before surgery. The weight loss in the first year was serially recorded. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between preoperative GV and postoperative weight loss after one year. The secondary outcomes were the correlation between preoperative GV and other patients\' characteristics as age and body mass index (BMI).
    UNASSIGNED: Weight and BMI decreased significantly up to 12 months. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months was significantly higher than at three months. Preoperative GV was 1021 ± 253, ranging from 397 to 1543 mL. GV was not related to sex, age, weight, height, postoperative weight, and BMI.
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative gastric volume cannot predict weight loss one year after LSG. It is not correlated with age, sex, or preoperative weight, and BMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号