BACKGROUND: Facelifts are one of the most common facial aesthetic surgery procedures. Patient satisfaction determines success of most aesthetic surgery but has been historically difficult to assess.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated reviews by facelift patients on the aesthetic surgery social media website RealSelf.com to determine positive and negative factors underlying patient satisfaction following facelifts.
METHODS: Facelift reviews were gathered from RealSelf.com with an automated web crawler. Reviews were categorized as positive or negative and by the primary and secondary reasons for the positive or negative review. Patient \"worth it\" and star ratings, physician specialty, and cost of procedure were also collected.
RESULTS: A total of 2153 facelift reviews were collected. Overall, 1986 (92.24%) were positive and 167 (7.76%) were negative. The most common overall reasons for a positive review were aesthetic results (n=1571, 79.10%) and bedside manner (n=1488, 74.92%). The most common overall reasons for a negative review were outcome (n=137, 82.04%) and bedside manner (n=82, 49.10%). Most facelifts were performed by plastic surgeons (n=1796, 83.42%). The greatest 5-star rating percentages were seen for oral and maxillofacial surgeons (n=29, 93.55%), otolaryngologists (n=96, 92.31%), and plastic surgeons (n=1642, 91.43%). Of patients who provided a \"worth it\" rating, 1216 (91.91%) stated that their facelift was \"worth it.\"
CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient sentiment toward facelifts was positive. The factors most commonly affecting a positive patient experience were bedside manner and aesthetic results. Negative patient reviews were primarily attributed to dissatisfaction with aesthetic outcomes. Social media serves as a valuable tool for evaluating patient satisfaction with aesthetic surgery.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of the facelift is to rejuvenate the face without changing its natural features. This involves working on the deeper layers to preserve the surface look while adjusting the fat pads beneath. Thus, we often use a modified High-SMAS facelift method, following this deep-layer approach. The study evaluates whether the high-SMAS facelift, focusing on optimal repositioning, can effectively reduce aging signs in the mid to lower face and neck.
METHODS: Conducted from 2018 to 2022, this retrospective cohort study included demographic data, relevant comorbidities, and operative details of patients undergoing lateral extended high-SMAS facial lifting, excluding revision cases. Complications were recorded, and a minimum one-year follow-up was ensured. The technique\'s effectiveness was assessed using pre- and one-year post-surgery images analyzed by three masked examiners with a validated scoring method by La Padula et al. RESULTS: The study included 325 patients, with no major complications reported. Significant improvements were noted in post-operative High-SMAS visual scores compared to pre-operative scores (p < 0.0001), particularly in cheek fullness, jawline, and cervical angle definition.
CONCLUSIONS: The High-SMAS facelift technique, evaluated using the Face- and Neck-Lift Objective Photo-Numerical Assessment Scale, demonstrated significant cosmetic enhancements. This technique, focusing on optimal flap draping vectors, effectively restores a youthful appearance by improving facial contours.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Arthroplasty with discectomy is a proven treatment for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), however there is no consensus on the type of interpositional graft that should be used after the disc is removed. While an ideal graft should be easy to obtain and provide an adequate buffer between the articular surfaces, the authors suggest that it should also minimize donor site morbidity. This Technical Note highlights the technique for harvesting and utilizing the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) as an interpositional graft. Three patients were treated with a SMAS graft after TMJ arthroplasty with discectomy. The average pain score decreased from 9/10 preoperatively to 2/10 at 6 weeks postoperatively, while the average maximum incisal opening increased from 31 mm to 36.7 mm. Since these patients were concurrently treated with a facelift, they were asked about their esthetic outcome on a scale of 1-10, with 1 representing extremely dissatisfied and 10 representing extremely satisfied. The average esthetic rating at 6 weeks postoperatively was 9.3/10. The SMAS interpositional graft technique eliminates a second surgical site, improves function, reduces pain, and provides the opportunity for concurrent esthetic facial rejuvenation if desired.

In this article, the authors describe their preferred advanced deep-plane techniques and modifications that have universally improved outcomes and durability in both men and women. Performing a proper extended deep-plane facelift and neck lift avoids the need to camouflage scars and stigmata of lifts seen in superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication and other techniques. In the author\'s experience, vertical vector deep-plane surgery is more durable, natural, and less reliant on lipofilling and volume addition. The subtleties of examination and analysis, surgical technique, clinical outcomes, and gender-specific considerations in the reconstruction of gonial and cervicomental angles, deep planar volumetric reduction, facial volumetric change, limited skin delamination, and revision techniques are discussed.

The following questions guided the study: Can the use of fibrin glue in drainless rhytidoplasty reduce hematoma prevalence, seroma prevalence increase patient satisfaction or decrease the length of hospital in the adult population compared with standard treatment? The following inclusion and exclusion criteria apply: The procedure performed was rhytidoplasty for both groups. Participants were limited to adults who did not have any other procedure performed during the study. The intervention consisted of the use of fibrin glue without drains compared to the control group, in which drains and/or pressure dressing were applied. Databases: clinicaltrials.gov, MEDLINE, COCHRANE, mRCT, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, VHL, GHL were searched on 03/25/2023 by 2 different investigators. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used. Five studies were included with a total number of 1277 participants (2554 face sides). The cumulative hematoma rate was OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.26-0.84) in favor of using fibrin glue. Insufficient data were available to assess seroma rate, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. The risk of study bias was judged to be low and moderate. The certainty for the use of fibrin sealant versus drainage is high and the importance of outcomes is rated as important in the GRADEpro GDT tool. Fibrin glue use is more beneficial comparing to drainage in patients undergoing rhytidectomy in terms of hematoma prevalence. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421475).Level of Evidence I This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

We present a case of a two-stage reconstruction of a traumatic right upper helix deformity using a random pattern layover skin flap in conjunction with an aesthetic facelift procedure. This serves to encourage reconstructive surgeons to be mindful about seeking opportunities to address additional patient concerns when appropriate and safe.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates change in practice patterns in facelift surgery based on a 15-year review of tracer data collected by the American Board of Plastic Surgery as part of the Continuous Certification process.
METHODS: Tracer data for facelift was reviewed from 2006 to 2021. The 15-year collection period was divided into an \"early cohort (EC)\" from 2006 to 2014 and a \"recent cohort (RC)\" from 2015 to 2021.
RESULTS: Of 3400 facelifts (1710 EC/1690 RC) performed, 18% were done in hospital and 76% were done in an accredited office facility. Ninety one percent of patients were female with an average age of 61 years. There was an increase in the number of secondary facelifts (4% EC vs 18% RC; p < 0.001) and an increased number of patients concerned about volume loss/deflation (25% EC vs 37% RC; p < 0.001). The surgical approach to the SMAS involved plication (40%), flaps (35%), SMASectomy (22%) and MACS lift (6%). One percent of facelifts were subperiosteal and 8% skin-only. Significantly more surgeons used the lateral SMAS flap (14% EC vs 18% RC, p < 0.005), while less used an extended SMAS flap (21% vs 18%; p = 0.001) and MACS lift (10% EC vs 6% RC; p = 0.021) techniques. The concomitant use of facial fat grafting is becoming more common (15% EC vs 24% RC, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A 15-year review of ABPS tracer data provides an excellent venue for the objective assessment of the current status of facelift surgery, and key changes in practice patterns during that time.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

UNASSIGNED: Facelift procedures are a popular method of facial rejuvenation. The most common technique is superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, with several variations. However, the optimal approach remains unclear. This review analyzed previous studies to compare SMAS facelift techniques, their outcomes, and complication rates.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases in September 2022. The search included studies published from January 2000 to September 2022 using keywords such as \"facelift,\" \"complications,\" and \"outcomes.\"
UNASSIGNED: This review examined 27 selected studies that evaluated 6 SMAS facelift techniques. The studies involved 6086 patients in total, over 85% of who were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The complication rates varied depending on the technique used, with the SMAS flap and composite SMAS technique having the highest (5.75%) and lowest (0.05%) complication rates, respectively. The most common complications were temporary facial nerve injury (0.85%) and skin necrosis (0.41%). To date, only one case of permanent facial nerve injury has been reported.
UNASSIGNED: On the basis of our findings, SMAS facelift techniques achieve high patient satisfaction rates, with complication rates that vary by technique. The composite SMAS technique showed the lowest complication rates, whereas the SMAS flap showed the highest rate. However, some studies have not reported all complications, making it difficult to determine the best approach. Therefore, future studies are required to identify the most aesthetically pleasing technique with the lowest complication risk.

Our role as aesthetic surgeons demands individualized surgical planning that maximizes patient input and understanding. The value of such shared decision-making (SDM) in aesthetic surgery is becoming increasingly appreciated. This is particularly true for potential patients seeking surgical rejuvenation of the face, where the volume of \"educational\" information available on the internet, and through various social medial channels, may be overwhelming and even misleading. Presented is a \"3-Level approach to facelift planning\" named for the facial subregions targeted. This novel paradigm maximizes SDM with its simplicity and reproducibility, serves as an invaluable educational tool for patients, novice and seasoned surgeons alike, and facilitates communication between senior surgeons through its descriptive standardization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: The application of radiofrequency (RF) and HIFES on the body provides improvement in skeletal muscle tissue, reduction in fatty tissue, reorganization of connective tissue, and skin texture improvement. However, overall facial appearance relies on both skin and underlying structures, specifically muscles and connective tissue which have to be treated as one unit to achieve proper care while preserving fatty layers that define youth facial appearance.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to find whether the effect of novel RF + HIFES is safe and can induce the lifting of soft tissue and overall improvement in facial appearance.
METHODS: In this study, 21 subjects were enrolled. The therapy was administered in four 20-min treatments on the forehead and cheeks. Photographs were evaluated by a Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS) and linear measurements of facial tissue lifting at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Volumetric changes in the cheek area were investigated as well. The patients\' satisfaction, safety, and comfort were documented throughout the study.
RESULTS: The data indicated improvement in overall facial appearance, and 23% of average lifting was found in brows (p = 3.14 × 10-12 ) and cheeks (p = 6.00 × 10-15 ). The assessment of digital photographs showed an improvement in 100% of patients at 3-month follow-up. The treatments were safe, accompanied by high therapy comfort and subject satisfaction of 98%.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment by simultaneous RF and HIFES technology produces significant changes to the overall facial appearance, characterized by the lifting of facial tissues.