OBJECTIVE: To report a common site of external ear canal erosion in multiple pathologies, located inferiorly at 6 o\'clock.
METHODS: Otology patients who came in 2023 for treatment of external auditory canal erosions.
METHODS: This clinical capsule is an observational report of the external canal\'s propensity to erosion at the 6 o\'clock location. Patient treatments were canalplasty, mastoidectomy, and medical management.
METHODS: Documentation of the propensity to erosion at the 6 o\'clock location in the external auditory canal. Locations of the niduses of prior series of external auditory canal pathologies are documented.
RESULTS: Eight patients are presented with external auditory canal erosion in 10 ears originating at the 6 o\'clock position medial to the bony-cartilaginous junction. No other patient with spontaneous canal erosion presented with their nidus of pathology in another canal location. (A review of 42 case series of 291 patients found that keratosis obturans and bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis tended to arise from the same 6 o\'clock lateral bony canal location, while 26% of necrotizing otitis externa cases arose there.).
CONCLUSIONS: The \"6 o\'clock spot\" in the external canal is a common location of canal erosion for spontaneous wax and keratin collections and may be the precursor to keratosis obturans, bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the ear canal, and necrotizing otitis externa.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the precision of language-model artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing conditions by contrasting its predictions with diagnoses made by board-certified otologic/neurotologic surgeons using patient-described symptoms.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Tertiary care center.
METHODS: One hundred adults participated in the study. These included new patients or established patients returning with new symptoms. Individuals were excluded if they could not provide a written description of their symptoms.
METHODS: Summaries of the patient\'s symptoms were supplied to three publicly available AI platforms: Chat GPT 4.0, Google Bard, and WebMD \"Symptom Checker.\"
METHODS: This study evaluates the accuracy of three distinct AI platforms in diagnosing otologic conditions by comparing AI results with the diagnosis determined by a neurotologist with the same information provided to the AI platforms and again after a complete history and physical examination.
RESULTS: The study includes 100 patients (52 men and 48 women; average age of 59.2 yr). Fleiss\' kappa between AI and the physician is -0.103 (p < 0.01). The chi-squared test between AI and the physician is χ2 = 12.95 (df = 2; p < 0.001). Fleiss\' kappa between AI models is 0.409. Diagnostic accuracies are 22.45, 12.24, and 5.10% for ChatGPT 4.0, Google Bard, and WebMD, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary language-model AI platforms can generate extensive differential diagnoses with limited data input. However, doctors can refine these diagnoses through focused history-taking, physical examinations, and clinical experience-skills that current AI platforms lack.

BACKGROUND: The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam (OQUA) is developed to evaluate multiple ear complaints and their impact on patients\' daily lives. The current clinical use of this questionnaire is below the potential utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the barriers and enablers of using the OQUA as perceived by ENT surgeons and patients and provide recommendations for an implementation strategy.
METHODS: Prospective and qualitative analysis was performed using focus groups and interviews with ENT professionals (n = 15) and patients (n = 25) with ear complaints of one tertiary referral hospital and two regional hospitals. Barriers and enablers were identified and classified by using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Suggestions for an implementation strategy will be made accordingly.
RESULTS: ENT professionals\' barriers included lack of knowledge and skills to use the OQUA, inadequate technological support and perceived time constraints during consultation, uncertainty about the clinical relevance and lack of feedback on the outcomes of the OQUA. Enablers included beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the professional, organization and science. Patients\' barriers included lack of knowledge about the objective and usefulness of the OQUA, perceived burden, difficulties in completing the questionnaire and insufficient feedback during consultation. Patient enablers included beliefs about beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the patient, health care and society. Suggested interventions involved education, training, environmental restructuring and incentivisation.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, we propose an implementation strategy should focus on education and training about the objective, outcomes and relevance of the OQUA, environmental restructuring regarding the optimal use of the OQUA, and incentivisation with feedback on the valuable outcomes of the OQUA for the patient, professional and healthcare. Future research is needed to determine the feasibility of the implementation strategy.

The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological aspects, clinical features and principles of management of different types of auricular and peri-auricular pathologies.
This is a 5-year retrospective descriptive study (from May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2023) of the records of patients who consulted for a functional or cosmetic complaint relating to the auricle or periauricular region in the ENT and cervico-facial surgery department of the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sylvanus Olympio.
A total of 159 cases over 5 years, i.e. an annual frequency of 31 cases, met the study criteria. The mean age of the patients was 22.2 years. Children and students accounted for 24.5% and 23.9% of cases respectively. Auricular pathologies accounted for 64.8% of cases and peri-auricular pathologies for 36.2%.Tumors and trauma accounted for 33.3% and 29.6% of cases respectively, and congenital pathologies were found in 29.9% of cases. Among traumatic lesions, intentional assault and battery was the cause in 21.3%, followed by road accidents in 17.2%. The right ear was affected in 48% and the lobule in 40.4%. Keloids accounted for 17.6% of all cases, and 53% of tumors and pseudotumors. The left ear was involved in 50% of cases. Piercing was the cause of keloids in 10.7% of cases.
Auricular and peri-auricular pathologies were dominated by benign tumors, trauma and congenital pathologies, and involved young subjects. Management is based on the type of lesion, with functional and aesthetic considerations in mind.

暂无摘要。

Cerumen lubricates and protects the external auditory canal, but excess accumulation can lead to ear fullness, itching, otalgia, discharge, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Cerumen should be treated whenever symptoms are present or if it limits diagnosis by preventing a needed otoscopic examination. Clinicians should evaluate for cerumen impaction in those using hearing aids and patients with intellectual disability. Cerumen impaction can be treated with cerumenolytics, ear irrigation, and manual removal with instrumentation. Aural foreign bodies can cause ear fullness, otalgia, discharge, and hearing loss. They are more common in children than adults. The most common type of aural foreign bodies in children is jewelry, followed by paper products, parts of pens or pencils, desk supplies (eg, erasers), BBs or pellets, and earplugs or earphones. In adults, the most common aural foreign bodies are cotton swabs or cotton, followed by hearing aid parts and jewelry or ear accessories. Patients should avoid using cotton tip applicators in the external auditory canal. Alligator forceps, small right angle hooks, and ear irrigation commonly are used to remove aural foreign bodies in an outpatient clinic setting, but the choice depends on the type of foreign body. Soft and irregularly shaped objects can be removed without referral to an otolaryngologist. Patients with hard, spherical, or cylindrical objects should be referred to an otolaryngologist if previous removal attempts have failed or if there is ear trauma to avoid worsening its position in the ear canal.

BACKGROUND: Auriculocondylar syndrome (ARCND) is an extremely rare autosomal dominant or recessive condition that typically manifests as question mark ears (QMEs), mandibular condyle hypoplasia, and micrognathia. Severe dental and maxillofacial malformations present considerable challenges in patients\' lives and clinical treatment. Currently, only a few ARCND cases have been reported worldwide, but most of them are related to genetic mutations, clinical symptoms, and ear correction; there are few reports concerning the treatment of dentofacial deformities.
METHODS: Here, we report a rare case of ARCND in a Chinese family. A novel insertional mutation in the guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-inhibiting activity polypeptide 3 (GNAI3) was identified in the patient and their brother using whole-exome sequencing. After a multidisciplinary consultation and examination, sequential orthodontic treatment and craniofacial surgery, including distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgery, were performed using three-dimensional (3D) digital technology to treat the patient\'s dentofacial deformity. A good prognosis was achieved at the 5-year follow-up, and the patient returned to normal life.
CONCLUSIONS: ARCND is a monogenic and rare condition that can be diagnosed based on its clinical triad of core features. Molecular diagnosis plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of patients with inconspicuous clinical features. We present a novel insertion variation in GNAI3, which was identified in exon 2 of chromosome 110116384 in a Chinese family. Sequential therapy with preoperative orthodontic treatment combined with distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgery guided by 3D digital technology may be a practical and effective method for treating ARCND.

The article analyses level and dynamics of morbidity of diseases of ear and mastoid in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) in 2020-2021 and availability of otorhinolaryngological care. The methods of comparative statistics and mathematical analysis were applied to analyze official data provided by the Yakut Republic Medical Information and Analytical Center, the specialized Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the Republic Hospital № 2 - Center for Emergency Medical Care and the Federal State Statistics Service of Russia. The study established increasing trend of increasing morbidity of these diseases in both the adult and child population. In 2021, the growth rate of overall morbidity of adult population reached 17.7% and 8.8% in children, as compared to 2020. The primary morbidity of adults made up to 22.3%, in children - 15.7%. The comparative analysis demonstrated higher rates of general morbidity in the Republic: by 0.5% as compared with the Russian Federation and by 14.1% as compared with the Far Eastern Federal Okrug. The level of primary morbidity was lower than similar indicators of the compared territories by 17.1% and 3.0%, respectively. It is worth noting that analyzed morbidity of diseases of ear and mastoid reflects prevalence of ENT diseases in the region only indirectly, as the statistical data do not allow to estimate separately rate of upper respiratory tract lesions. Meanwhile, respiratory diseases rank first in the structure of population diseases in Yakutia. The growth of disability in children due to diseases of ear and mastoid requires attention. Among children of 0-17 years old, the indicator of primary disability increased from 0.38 to 0.8 per 10,000 of children population (increase of 110.5%); in children 0-3 years old - from 0.9 to 2.3 per 10,000 of the child population (an increase of 155.6%). The analysis of the number of beds in otorhinolaryngology wards established that that the bed capacity per 10,000 population was 0.6 that is significantly lower than the established standards. The article emphasizes need to adjust the Federal standards for hospital bed capacity, taking into account climatic and geographical conditions of the region, which contribute to spread and chronization of ENT diseases.

BACKGROUND: Red Ear Syndrome is a burning sensation and erythema of the ear, associated with a various number of disorders including migraine, trigeminal neuralgia, autoimmune disorders etc. Theories for RES pathophysiology have developed from current understandings of comorbid conditions. Characterizing the underlying mechanism of RES is crucial for defining effective treatments.
METHODS: Three caucasian patients, ages 15, 47, and 67 years, with migraine, one with erythromelalgia are reported in this manuscript. RES pathophysiology is not fully understood due to its variable clinical presentation and numerous comorbid conditions, making it difficult to identify effective treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: RES seems to be largely treatment-resistant, and most options involve treating the associated disorders and minimizing pain. Further investigation of future cases should lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental cause of RES and, hopefully, successful treatments.

BACKGROUND: Pathway innovation using smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiometry technologies to deliver ear and hearing services via trained audiologists may improve efficiency of the service. An ENT-integrated-community-ear service (ENTICES-combining community audiology management, remote ENT review and novel technologies) was piloted. We aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of ENTICES.
METHODS: ENTICES was a community-based and audiologist-led pathway. Patients with otological symptoms were self-referred to this service. Smartphone otoscopy and tablet-based audiograms were performed. Two otologists reviewed all decisions made in the community by audiologists based on video-otoscopy, hearing tests and chart reviews. Data on the first 50 consecutive new patients attending either consultant-led hospital otology clinics (HOC), audiologist-led hospital advanced audiology diagnostics (AAD) or ENTICES clinics were collected between 1 August 2021 and 31 December 2021. Data were collected through chart reviews and questionnaires to compare the three pathways with respect to efficiency, patient satisfaction, technology utility and safety.
RESULTS: No audiology-led ENTICES decisions were amended by hospital otologists following remote review. Remote review of video-otoscopy with history was sufficient for a diagnosis in 80% of cases. Adding hearing tests and standardised history increased the diagnostic yield to 98%. Patient satisfaction scores showed 100% service recommendation. The cost per patient, per visit, was £83.36, £99.07 and £69.72 for AAD, HOC or ENTICES, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ENTICES provides a safe ear and hearing service that patients rated highly. Thirty-two per cent of hospital otology patients were eligible for this service. For those patients, ENTICES is 20% more cost-effective and can reduce the number of clinic visits by up to 60% compared with HOC.