EXS2600

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOFMS)广泛用于MALDIBiotyper(BrukerDaltonics)和VitekMS(biomerieux)上丝状真菌的鉴定,但是真菌在新型EXS2600(Zybio)上的鉴定性能仍然未知。我们的研究旨在评估新的EXS2600系统(Zybio)快速识别丝状真菌的能力,并确定其对我们实验室的周转时间(TAT)的影响。
    方法:我们使用两种预处理方法测试了117种丝状真菌:甲酸三明治(FA三明治)和商业霉菌提取试剂盒(MEK,Zybio)。通过序列分析确认所有分离物。实验室数据从我们的实验室信息系统中提取了两个9个月的时间:EXS之前(2022年4月至12月)和EXS之后(2023年4月至12月)。分别。
    结果:总体正确的鉴定(在物种,属,或复杂/群体水平)真菌率高,FA-三明治(95.73%,112/117),其次是MEK(94.02%,110/117)。不包括不在数据库中的6个隔离,FA三明治的种级识别准确率为92.79%(103/111),MEK的种级识别准确率为91.89%(102/111);属级准确率为97.29%(108/111)和96.39%(107/111),分别。两种方法对曲霉的正确识别率均达到100%,Lichtheimia,毛霉根霉和Talaromces种,并且能够在富士镰刀菌物种复合体中区分旋切镰刀菌和增殖镰刀菌。值得注意的是,在罕见真菌的物种水平鉴定中观察到了很高的置信度,例如玫瑰毛霉和念珠菌。所有阳性培养物的TAT从EXS2600前下降到后(108.379VS102.438,P<0.05),组织TAT下降最多(451.538VS222.304,P<0.001)。
    结论:FA夹心法比MEK更有效,更准确地鉴定EXS2600丝状真菌。我们的研究首先评估了在EXS2600上进行真菌鉴定的性能,并表明它适用于临床微生物学实验室。
    OBJECTIVE: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is extensively employed for the identification of filamentous fungi on MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics) and Vitek MS (biomerieux), but the performance of fungi identification on new EXS2600 (Zybio) is still unknow. Our study aims to evaluate the new EXS2600 system\'s (Zybio) ability to rapidly identify filamentous fungi and determine its effect on turnaround time (TAT) in our laboratory.
    METHODS: We tested 117 filamentous fungi using two pretreatment methods: the formic acid sandwich (FA-sandwich) and a commercial mold extraction kit (MEK, Zybio). All isolates were confirmed via sequence analysis. Laboratory data were extracted from our laboratory information system over two 9-month periods: pre-EXS (April to December 2022) and post-EXS (April to December 2023), respectively.
    RESULTS: The total correct identification (at the species, genus, or complex/group level) rate of fungi was high, FA-sandwich (95.73%, 112/117), followed by MEK (94.02%, 110/117). Excluding 6 isolates not in the database, species-level identification accuracy was 92.79% (103/111) for FA-sandwich and 91.89% (102/111) for MEK; genus-level accuracy was 97.29% (108/111) and 96.39% (107/111), respectively. Both methods attained a 100% correct identification rate for Aspergillus, Lichtheimia, Rhizopus Mucor and Talaromyces species, and were able to differentiate between Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum within the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex. Notably, high confidence was observed in the species-level identification of uncommon fungi such as Trichothecium roseum and Geotrichum candidum. The TAT for all positive cultures decreased from pre EXS2600 to post (108.379 VS 102.438, P < 0.05), and the TAT for tissue decreased most (451.538 VS 222.304, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The FA-sandwich method is more efficient and accurate for identifying filamentous fungi with EXS2600 than the MEK. Our study firstly evaluated the performance of fungi identification on EXS2600 and showed it is suitable for clinical microbiology laboratories use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOFMS)彻底改变了基于培养的微生物学诊断。临床微生物学实验室中常用的MALDI-TOFMS系统是MALDIBiotyper(BrukerDaltonics)和VitekMS(bioMérieux),但最近新的EXS2600(Zybio)已经推出。本研究旨在通过将结果与16SrRNA基因测序进行比较来评估三种设备的性能。一组356个先前收集的难以识别的细菌与三个系统并行测试。仅采用直接涂片法和简单的甲酸提取法。98.6%取得了有效结果,94.4%,和93.3%的所有分离株由MALDIBiotyper,EXS2600和VitekMS,分别。在所有有效的结果中,与测序数据的一致性达到98.9%,98.5%,MALDIBiotyper的99.7%,EXS2600和VitekMS,分别。仅考虑在单物种水平上具有有效测量值的分离株,错误识别率为0%,2.6%,MALDIBiotyper为1.1%,EXS2600和VitekMS,分别。除了轻微的性能差异,我们的数据表明,这三种系统提供了相当的结果,适用于医学诊断实验室.
    Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has revolutionized diagnostics in culture-based microbiology. Commonly used MALDI-TOF MS systems in clinical microbiology laboratories are MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics) and Vitek MS (bioMérieux), but recently the new EXS2600 (Zybio) has been launched. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the three devices by comparing the results to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A set of 356 previously collected difficult-to-identify bacteria was tested in parallel with the three systems. Only the direct smear method and simple formic acid extraction were applied. Valid results were achieved for 98.6%, 94.4%, and 93.3% of all isolates by MALDI Biotyper, EXS2600, and Vitek MS, respectively. Of all valid results, agreement with sequencing data was achieved in 98.9%, 98.5%, and 99.7% by MALDI Biotyper, EXS2600, and Vitek MS, respectively. Considering only the isolates with valid measurements at the single-species level, misidentification rates were 0%, 2.6%, and 1.1% for MALDI Biotyper, EXS2600, and Vitek MS, respectively. Apart from minor performance differences, our data demonstrate that the three systems provide comparable results and are suitable for use in medical diagnostic laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号