背景:终止妊娠的手术和医疗选择在实践中是可以接受的,但临床疗效不同,成本,和病人的经历,决定什么是最好的方法并不总是清楚。本研究旨在比较临床疗效,结果,在伊朗的情况下,患者接受扩张和刮宫术(D和C)与使用米索前列醇进行药物流产的情况。
方法:前瞻性,多中心,从2021年7月到2022年1月进行的准实验研究。主要结果是复合并发症或完全流产的发生率。数据采用SPSS18进行描述性统计分析,独立t检验,方差分析和非参数检验。次要结果是使用EQ5D问卷的生活质量,估计失血量,盆腔感染,疼痛程度,住院,干预的可接受性和相对风险作为效应大小。
结果:最后,本研究包括168名患者。药物流产患者的复合并发症发生率明显高于手术流产患者(39.3%vs.4.76%)。相对危险度计算为8.25(3.05-22.26CI)。药物流产患者经历了更高水平的持续出血,疼痛,还有盆腔感染的症状.与医疗组患者相比,手术组患者的接受程度更高(85.7%vs.59.5%)。手术组和医疗组的生活质量评分分别为0.6605和0.5419。
结论:与单独使用米索前列醇的医学方法相比,使用D和C的手术方法是非常安全且非常成功的选择,并且具有更好的临床结局。接受,伊朗妇女怀孕前三个月的生活质量。
BACKGROUND: The surgical and medical options for management of pregnancy termination procedures are acceptable in practice but differ in clinical efficacy, costs, and patient experiences, and deciding what the best method is not clear always. This study aimed to compare clinical efficacy, outcomes, and patient acceptance of dilatation and curettage (D and C) versus medical abortion using misoprostol for first trimester of gestation in Iranian context.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, quasi-experimental research conducted from July 2021 to January 2022. The primary outcomes were the rate of composite complications or complete abortion. Data were analyzed with SPSS 18 using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, analysis of variance and non-parametric tests. Secondary outcomes were quality of life using EQ5D questionnaire, estimated blood loss, pelvic infection, pain level, hospital stay, and acceptability of intervention and relative risk as the effect size.
RESULTS: Finally, 168 patients were included in this study. The composite complication rate among medical abortion patients is significantly more than that of surgical abortion patients (39.3% vs. 4.76%). The relative risk calculated 8.25 (3.05-22.26 CI). Medical abortion patients have experienced higher levels of ongoing bleeding, pain, and symptoms of pelvic infection. The higher level of acceptance has been reported by surgical group patients in comparison to the medical group patients (85.7% vs. 59.5%). Quality of life scores for surgical and medical group estimated 0.6605 and 0.5419, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical method of abortion using D and C is a very safe and highly successful option in comparison to the medical method using misoprostol alone and is associated with better clinical outcomes, acceptance, and quality of life in first trimester of pregnancy among Iranian women.